Cicn 2014
Cicn 2014
Cicn 2014
net/publication/275465991
CITATION READS
1 799
2 authors:
All content following this page was uploaded by Deepak Punetha on 22 May 2015.
Keywords— rectangular shape microstrip patch antenna; These drawback actually have been minimized in recent years
dielectric substrates; scattering parameter measurements; mobile in one can achieve a bandwidth of microstrip antennas is about
communication; antenna parameters; radiation pattern 65% [3]. An another drawbacks is their relatively low radiation
efficiency as one can go up in frequency or when the antenna
I. MICROSTRIP ANTENNA OVERVIEW array size increases and this is due to the increase in the
feeding network losses which increase the lengths of the
Microstrip antennas are one of the most popular antennas in feeding lines increase and also with the frequency. Again this
the wireless communication market. One can find application kind of drawback can be traced back to the initial design of the
of Microstrip antennas in various safe fields of high-tech microstrip antennas but in the recent years also a significant
technology like in mobile communication, in our cellular breakthrough has been done. Various rectangular shape patch
phone (fig. 1), in satellite communication either in fixed the antenna designs has been simulated in this paper report which
antenna so fixed application of mobile applications beside a is based on a wave guide, hybrid wave guide in Microstrip
climatory, biomedical uses or either siege them. Microstrip lines or planar plate wave guides in which the network losses
antenna receive considerable attention starting in 1974's in a have been minimized dramatically and one can obtain a high
paper written by Robert E. Munson [1], although the idea of a efficiency even at a very high frequencies up to 70 or 40 GHz.
Microstrip antenna can be traced back to G. A. Deschamps in Another drawback of microstrip antennas is their relatively low
1953 [2]. Microstrip antenna are also very easy to fabricate and power level that they can confine because there is danger of
can be integrated with other Microstrip components in break through between patch antenna and their ground.
monolithic applications like RFIC and MMIC. However they Therefore they cannot feed very well for application like high
have also some drawbacks. Those drawbacks which are power radars in which one can try to transmit a power in
discussed in this paper report are initially when Microstrip KWatts and MWatts. So the simulation result has been
antenna has started to be present in the market but some of presented for an antenna which can operate very well in
them have been minimized dramatically. The major drawback hundreds of watts but not very high power.
of a microstrip antenna is its low frequency bandwidth and the
reason for their low frequency bandwidth is because of their
physical basic concept.
22
frequency selected for design a microstrip antenna in this §W ·
paper report is 1.9 GHz. For measure the scattering parameters (ε reff + 0.3) ¨ + 0.264 ¸
© h ¹
an adaptive range of 1 GHz to 3 GHz has been used. ΔL = 0.412h (7)
§W ·
2) Dielectric constant of the substrate ( r ): The
dielectric material selected for antenna design is RT Duroid (ε reff − 0.258 ) ¨ + 0.8 ¸
© h ¹
5880, Fused Quartz, Alumina and Epsilam. A substrate with a
5) Calculation of actual length of patch ( L ): The actual
high dielectric constant has been selected since it reduces the
length is obtained by re-writing equation (8) as:
dimensions of the antenna [13].
3) Height of dielectric substrate ( h ): For the microstrip L = Leff − 2ΔL (8)
patch antenna to be used in cellular phones, it is essential that 6) Calculation of the ground plane dimensions (Lg and Wg
the antenna is not bulky. Hence, the height of the dielectric ): The transmission line model is applicable to infinite ground
substrate is selected as 1.59 mm. planes only. However, for practical considerations, it is
essential to have a finite ground plane. It has been shown by
[14] that similar results for finite and infinite ground plane can
be obtained if the size of the ground plane is greater than the
patch dimensions by approximately six times the substrate
thickness all around the periphery. Hence, for this design, the
ground plane dimensions would be given as:
Lg = 6h + L (9)
Wg = 6h + W (10)
7) Calculation of the cut depth of inset feed (y0): The
Fig. 3. Microstrip Patch Antenna accurate inset feed cut depth (y0) for a rectangular shape
microstrip patch antenna [15] with thin dielectric substrates to
B. Design Procedure get 50 ohm input impedance is:
For designing an antenna several parameters has been 0.001699ε r 7 + 0.13761ε r 6 − 6.1783ε r 5 ½
needed like width, length etc. Some essential parameters such ° °L
y0 = 10−4 ®+93.187ε r 4 − 682.69ε r 3 + 2561.9ε r 2 ¾ (11)
as chop cut width of rectangular slot kept 5 mm and width of
the feed is fixed to 3.009 mm. For different substrates different °−4043ε + 6697 °2
¯ r ¿
shape of rectangular patch antennas have been designed
because the value of designing parameters changes with the (2 ≤ ε r ≤ 10)
substrates [7]. The proposed antenna based on the Rectangular Microstrip
1) Calculation of the Width (W ): The width of the Patch Antenna. The antenna is planar Rectangular Patch
Microstrip patch antenna is given by equation (4) as: Antenna fed by Microstrip line on the PCB (Print Circuit
Board) substrates with dielectric constant values and 1.59 mm
c
W= (4) of thickness (h). This antenna is design at adaptive frequency
2 f0
( ε r + 1) range of 1 GHz to 3 GHz, width of microstrip is 3.009 mm for
match impedance with 50 ohms of transmission line. The
2 Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna is shown in fig. 3. The
where c = free space velocity of light Essential parameters of the design are shown in table 1.
2) Calculation of Effective dielectric constant ( reff):
Equation (5) gives the effective dielectric constant as: TABLE I. Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna Designing Specifications
1
−
ε r + 1 ε r −1 ª hº 2 Dielectric Substrates
ε reff = + «1 + 12 » (5) Epsilam
2 2 ¬ W¼ Antenna RT Duroid 5880 Fused Quartz
r=2.2 r=3.75
Alumina
r=9.9
r=12
Parameters (Loss
3) Calculation of the Effective length (Leff ): Equation (6) (Loss Tangent (Loss Tangent (Loss Tangent
Tangent
=0.001) =0.0001) =0.0001)
gives the effective length as: =0.002)
33.8173 30.9657
c W 62.4133 mm 51.2278 mm
Leff = (6) mm mm
2 f 0 ε reff reff 2.12508 3.54869 9.00805 10.8263
26.304028 23.99
4) Calculation of the length extension ( L ): Equation (7) Leff 54.1564 mm 41.9086 mm
mm mm
gives the length extension as: 0.6714
L 0.8394 mm 0.7537 mm 0.6799 mm
mm
24.9442 22.6472
L 52.4776 mm 40.4012 mm
mm mm
23
Dielectric Substrates The axial ratio is simulated for an antenna to demonstrate the
Epsilam desired polarization is circular.
Antenna RT Duroid 5880 Fused Quartz Alumina
r=12
Parameters r=2.2 r=3.75 r=9.9 Axial ratio= major axis ÷ minor axis
(Loss
(Loss Tangent (Loss Tangent (Loss Tangent
Tangent
=0.001) =0.0001) =0.0001) Fig. 5 represents the electric far field pattern for RT Duroid
=0.002)
Lg 62.0176 mm 49.9412 mm
34.4842 32.1872 5880, Fused Quartz, Alumina and Epsilam.
mm mm
43.3573 40.5057 B. Antenna Parameters
Wg 71.9533 mm 60.7678 mm
mm mm
For analyze the performance of an antenna, several
antenna parameters play a vital role. These parameters are
VI. SIMULATION SETUP AND RESULTS such as power radiated, Effective angle, Directivity and Gain
of an antenna [18]. Directivity is a key parameter of an
Microstrip Patch Antennas is very popular in the field of antenna. Directivity measure the direction of an antenna's
Mobile phone communication because of its small size, light
radiation pattern. Table 2 represents the antenna parameters of
weight, easy fabrication and low cost. In the modern
technology era mobile phone industry need a small size a rectangular shape microstrip patch antenna using different
antenna which can easily mount inside the cell phone. The dielectric substrates. When an antenna radiates equally
simulation results have been obtained by using ADS simulation distribution in all the direction then its directivity would be 0
tool [10-11]. There are some other parameters of an antenna dB.
which can affect the performance like directivity of an antenna,
TABLE II. Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna Parameters
a better gain, bandwidth and many more. Fig. 4 represents the
proposed rectangular shape microstrip patch antenna.
Dielectric Substrates
Antenna
Parameters RT Duroid
Fused Quartz Alumina Epsilam
5880
Directivity (dB) 5.6119 5.3533 5.3694 5.3582
24
GHz frequency, which is not desirable for mobile 5880, Fused Quartz, Alumina and Epsilam. The essential
communication. The inset feed cut depth (y0) for a rectangular parameters of an antenna such as radiation pattern, Directivity,
shape microstrip patch antenna with RT Duroid 5880 dielectric Gain and electric far field have been compared. An antenna
substrate is 12.6295 mm. with RT Duroid 5880 is costly and performs better at higher
frequency (>2 GHz). However in the frequency range of
mobile communication, the result revealed that alumina
substrate performs better than other dielectrics keeping
thickness of antenna 1.59 mm. The simulation results have
been obtained by using ADS simulation tool.
REFERENCES
[1] Robert E. Munson, "Microstrip antenna structures and arrays," United
States Patent 3921177 A, November 18, I975.
[2] G. A. Deschamps, "Microstrip microwave antennas," presented at the
Third USAF Symp. on Antennas, 1953.
[3] R. Garg, P. Bhatiya, I. J. Bahl and A. Ittipiboon, "Microstrip Antenna
Design Handbook," Artech House, 2001.
[4] P. J. Soh, M. K. A. Rahim, A. Asrokin, M. Z. A. Abdul Aziz, "Design,
modeling and performance comparison of different feeding techniques
for a microstrip patch antenna," Journal technology in university
technology Malaysia, 47(D) Dis.2007 103-120.
[5] C Wu, k. L. Wu, Z Bi, J. Litva, "Modelling of coaxial-fed microstrip
patch antenna By finite difference time domain method," Electronics
Fig. 6. Scattering Parameter Measurement different substrate Letters 12th September 1991, Vol. 27, issue 19, pp. 1691-1692.
[6] David M. Pozar and Susanne M. Voda," A Rigorous Analysis of a
When the microstrip patch antenna has been designed using Microstrip line Fed Patch Antenna", IEEE Transactions on Antennas
and Propagation, vol. 35, no. 12, December 1987, pp. 1343-1350.
fused quartz as substrate with length of transmission line inset
[7] David M. Pozar and Daniel H. Schaubert, "Microstrip Antennas: The
feed is 40 mm, it shows that input reflection factor give the Analysis and Design of Microstrip Antennas and Arrays," John Wiley &
best performance in the frequency range of 2.4 GHz to 2.8 Sons/ IEEE Press, 1995.
GHz, which is not a frequency band of cellular mobile. The [8] Duixian Liu, Ullrich Pfeiffer, Janusz Grzyb, Brian Gaucher, "Advanced
inset feed cut depth (y0) for a rectangular shape microstrip Millimeter-wave Technologies: Antennas, Packaging and Circuits,"
patch antenna with fused quartz dielectric substrate is 11.7325 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Great Britain, 2009.
mm. The next microstrip antenna has been designed with [9] David M. Pozar, "Microwave Engineering," John Wiley & Sons Inc.,
Alumina substrate and this time the length of the inset feed 4th edition, United State of America,ISBN 978-0-470-63155-3, 2011.
kept change and halved from its last design i.e. 20 mm. The [10] ADS RF Circuit Design Cook Book vol. 1, ver. 1.
inset feed cut depth (y0) for a rectangular shape microstrip [11] ADS Circuit Design Cookbook 2.0 [Online]. Available:
patch antenna with Alumina dielectric substrate is 10.4054 http://www.cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5991-1516EN.pdf
mm. It has been observed that scattering parameter is [12] Rappaport, Theodore S., "Wireless Communications: Principles and
Practice," Prentice Hall Communications Engineering and Emerging
appropriate in the frequency range of mobile communication. Technologies Series, 1999.
For better performance of the antenna, input reflection factor
[13] Rod Waterhouse, "Printed Antennas for Wireless Communications,"
should be |S11| 10. Furthermore another rectangular John Wiley & Sons Inc., England, 2007.
microstrip patch antenna has been designed with high relative [14] Kumar, G. and Ray, K.P., "Broadband Microstrip Antennas," Artech
dielectric constant, which was having the inset feed length of House, Inc, 2003.
20 mm. The dielectric constant for Epsilam is 12 (greater than [15] M. Ramesh and YIP KB, "Design Formula for Inset Fed Microstrip
10). The inset feed cut depth (y0) for a rectangular shape Patch Antenna," Journal of Microwaves and Optoelectronics, Vol. 3,
microstrip patch antenna with Epsilam dielectric substrate does N.0 3, December 2003.
not satisfy the Eq. (10). The transmission line feed length has [16] W.L. Stutzman, G.A. Thiele, "Antenna Theory and design," John Wiley
kept 10 mm. Now again the condition for the scattering & Sons, 2nd Ed., New York, 1998.
parameter measurement was not up to the mark for the mobile [17] Hector Torres, Hugo Mendizabal, Carlos Villarroel G., Mario Zamorano
phone frequency range. L., "LOS CAMPOS ELECTROMAGNETICOS EN LA TELEFONIA
CELLULAR SU INTERACCION CON EL SUSTRATO
NEURONAL," REVISTA FACULTAD DE INGENIERIA, U.T.A.
VII. CONCLUSION (CHILE), VOL 9,2001.
[18] Rodney B. Waterhouse, "Microstrip Patch Antennas: A Designer's
In the frequency range of mobile communication different Guide," Kluwer Academic Publishers, Springer, 2003.
rectangular shape microstrip patch antennas have been
designed using different dielectric substrates like RT Duroid
25