Ieee No. 3, Computer Overcurrent Relay I E E E Commit'Tee Report"
Ieee No. 3, Computer Overcurrent Relay I E E E Commit'Tee Report"
Ieee No. 3, Computer Overcurrent Relay I E E E Commit'Tee Report"
Abstract
This
report
addresses
the
r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of o v e r c u r r e n t r e l a y c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s i n
computer programs used f o r t h e a p l i c a t i o n of r e l a y s i n
power s y s t e m s .
To make t h e p r o c e s s s i m p l e and
e f f e c t i v e , c o n t i n u i n g work i s needed s o t h a t t h e
n e c e s s a r y d a t a can be made r e a d i l y a v a i l a b l e t o t h e
u s e r w i t h minimum e f f o r t . T h i s committee a c t i v i t y h a s
been i n p r o g r e s s f o r a number of y e a r s and h a s been
e x p e r i e n c i n g t h e f a s t d e v e l o p i n g changes i n computer
technology.
Today, t h e a v a i l a b l e equipment r a n g e s
from main-frame t o p e r s o n a l computers w i t h memory t h a t
is a d e q u a t e f o r t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n .
The r e p o r t ,
t h e r e f o r e addresses t h e p o s s i b i l i t y of s t o r i n g t h e
digitzed relay characteristics in tables.
The
r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f c u r v e s u s i n g a minimum number of
c o n s t a n t s is a l s o d i s c u s s e d . Accordingly t h i s r e p o r t
is i n t e n d e d t o be comprehensive s o t h a t e n g i n e e r s can
u n d e r s t a n d what h a s been done and is proposed.
Keywords: P r o t e c t i o n ,
Relays,
Modeling
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , Overcurrent relays.
relay
INTRODUCTION
P r o t e c t i o n and C o o r d i n a t i o n Concepts
In general, overcurrent protective devices a r e
used t o i s o l a t e o n l y t h e s e c t i o n of t h e system
a f f e c t e d by a f a u l t s o t h e r e m a i n i n g system can
continue t o o p e r a t e normally.
The b a s i c approach i s
that
an
abnormal
fault
current
is
clearly
d i s t i n g u i s h a b l e from a normal l o a d c u r r e n t , and t h e
p r o t e c t i v e d e v i c e s a r e d e s i g n e d t o respond
to
o v e r c u r r e n t s by o p e n i n g t h e a f f e c t e d c i r c u i t r a p i d l y .
S i n c e f a u l t s can o c c u r anywhere i n t h e s y s t e m ,
many p r o t e c t i v e d e v i c e s are r e q u i r e d .
These d e v i c e s
a r e l o c a t e d such t h a t a s i n g l e d e v i c e o r , i f
n e c e s s a r y , a combination of d e v i c e s o p e r a t e t o i s o l a t e
a fault.
Good p r a c t i c e d i c t a t e s , t h a t t h e i s o l a t e d
a r e a must be a s s m a l l a s p o s s i b l e and o n l y t h e d e v i c e s
n e a r e s t t o t h e f a u l t s h o u l d o p e r a t e t o perform t h i s
task.
I n a d d i t i o n , t h e p o s s i b i l i t y of t h e f a i l u r e of
a p r o t e c t i v e d e v i c e must be c o n s i d e r e d .
If this
happens, t h e n e x t upstream d e v i c e or a combination of
d e v i c e s must o p e r a t e t o p r o v i d e c o o r d i n a t e d backup
protection.
Time d i s c r i m i n a t i o n between s u c c e s s i v e
devices
provides
the
n e c e s s a r y means
for
the
c o o r d i n a t i o n of p r o t e c t i o n .
O v e r c u r r e n t C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s and P r o t e c t i o n P r a c t i c e s
T i m e o v e r c u r r e n t d e v i c e s have i n v e r s e t i m e - c u r r e n t
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s t o c l e a r f a u l t s with coordinated
minimum time d e l a y s .
With t h i s t y p e of c h a r a c t e r i s t i c , t h e greater t h e f a u l t current t h e shorter is
t h e t r i p time.
I n t h e p r o t e c t i v e system each d e v i c e
* T h i s r e p o r t was p r e p a r e d by t h e Computer
R e p r e s e n t a t i o n of Over c u r r e n t Relay C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s
Working Group of t h e Power System R e l a y i n g Committee.
The members of t h e Working Group a t t h e time of
p u b l i c a t i o n of t h i s paper a r e S.E. Zocholl (Chairman),
J.K. Akamine, A.E. Hughes, M.S. Sachdev, L. S c h a r f and
H.S. Smith.
88 SM 737-9
A p a p e r recommended and approved
by t h e IEEE Power System R e l a y i n g Committee of t h e
IEEE Power E n g i n e e r i n g S o c i e t y f o r p r e s e n t a t i o n a t
t h e IEEE/PES 1988 Summer Meeting, P o r t l a n d , Oregon,
J u l y 24 - 29, 1988. M a n u s c r i p t - i u b m i t t e d May lo, 1988;
made a v a i l a b l e f o r p r i n t i n g May 27, 1988.
i s a s s i g n e d a primary f u n c t i o n of c l e a r i n g f a u l t s i n a
s p e c i f i c region.
In a d d i t i o n , a secondary p r o t e c t i o n
f u n c t i o n i s a s s i g n e d t h a t c o n s i s t s of c l e a r i n g f a u l t s
i n t h e downstream r e g i o n s t o t h e e x t e n t t h a t t h e r a n g e
of t h e t i m e - c u r r e n t c h a r a c t e r i s t i c p e r m i t s .
The
protected region is a l s o referred t o a s the protected
zone.
For a f a u l t i n t h e p r o t e c t e d z o n e , t h e
o p e r a t i n g time f o r t h e primary d e v i c e s must be
s u f f i c i e n t l y s h o r t t o allow t h e secondary devices t o
reset w i t h o u t c a u s i n g a t r i p .
If a primary d e v i c e
f a i l s t o o p e r a t e , t h e secondary devices a r e expected
t o c o n t i n u e and i s o l a t e t h e f a u l t .
F u s e s and S e l f - c o n t a i n e d Breakers v e r s u s R e l a y s
The t r i p times f o r f u s e s and t r i p d e v i c e s
f u r n i s h e d on low v o l t a g e c i r c u i t b r e a k d e r s t e n d t o
e x h i b i t more v a r i a t i o n from u n i t t o u n i t t h a n do
overcurrent r e l a y s . Consequently, t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s
f o r t h e s e d e v i c e s a r e p u b l i s h e d a s bands r a t h e r t h a n
as s i n g l e c u r v e s t o which a t o l e r a n c e i s t o be
applied.
The lower edge of t h e band i n d i c a t e s t h e
minimum t i m e d u r a t i o n a t a s p e c i f i e d c u r r e n t i n which
t h e d e v i c e may i n i t i a t e a t r i p . The upper edge of t h e
band i n d i c a t e s t h e maximum time d u r a t i o n a t a
specified current f o r t h e device t o i n i t i a t e a t r i p
In addition, i f the
and f o r t h e c u r r e n t t o c l e a r .
c u r r e n t i s c l e a r e d i n l e s s t i m e t h a n t h e lower l i m i t
of t h e band, no t r i p w i l l o c c u r .
In contrast, t h e
t i m e - c u r r e n t c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s f o r over c u r r e n t r e l a y s
a r e published a s s i n g l e valued curves i n d i c a t i n g t h e
time r e q u i r e d f o r a s p e c i f i c c u r r e n t t o c l o s e t h e t r i p
The lower l i m i t of a band is
c o n t a c t s of t h e r e l a y .
n o t u s u a l l y p u b l i s h e d , b u t i s s p e c i f i e d as o v e r t r a v e l
and i m p u l s e margin. The d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e p u b l i c a t i o n
p r a c t i c e s s h o u l d o f f e r no d i f f i c u l t y , b e c a u s e t h e
d i f f e r e n c e s are a c c o u n t e d f o r i n t h e time margins
between c u r v e s r e p r e s e n t i n g t h e r e l a y c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s
f o r s e t t i n g s chosen from a c o o r d i n a t i o n s t u d y .
Data C o n s i s t e n c y
I t i s i m p o r t a n t t h a t t h e s p e c i f i e d t i m e of a
t r i p p i n g c h a r a c t e r i s t i c have e x a c t l y t h e same m e a n i i g
f o r a l l d e v i c e s , p a r t i c u l a r l y when a computer i s u s e d ,
s o t h a t t h e same t r e a t m e n t can be a p p l i e d t o a l l
cases.
The t r i p time s h o u l d t a k e i n t o a c c o u n t an
a l l o w a n c e f o r e x p e c t e d v a r i a t i o n s i n m a n u f a c t u r e of
t h e d e v i c e s and system v a r i a t i o n s s u c h as wave-form
d e v i a t i o n s r e s u l t i n g from i n i t i a l t r a n s i e n t s i n t h e
f a u l t current.
However, i t i s assumed t h a t no
a l l o w a n c e i s i n c l u d e d f o r s e r i o u s wave d i s t o r t i o n s
caused by l o a d s .
Allowance f o r s u c h v a r i a t i o n s a r e
s p e c i a l c o n s i d e r a t i o n s i n t h e a p p l i c a t i o n and a r e
u s u a l l y t a k e n care of by i n c r e a s e d time margins.
I n g e n e r a l i t i s e x p e c t e d t h a t each u s e r w i l l
e s t a b l i s h a s t a n d a r d T i m e Margin f o r h i s g e n e r a l u s e
t h a t can be s t o r e d i n t h e computer program b u t can be
m o d i f i e d by t h e i n p u t d a t a , a s a means of a d j u s t i n g
for special s i t u a t i o n s .
P u b l i s h e d Time-Current Curves
A t present,
Current-Time c u r v e s a r e used t o
The
describe t h e operation of a p r o t e c t i v e device.
computer d a t a must p r o v i d e t h e same i n f o r m a t i o n t h a t
is now o b t a i n e d by r e f e r r i n g t o t h e p u b l i s h e d
time-current curves.
However, t h e c u r v e s t h e m s e l v e s
cannot be s t o r e d i n t h e computer.
I n s t e a d , numerical
d a t a must be s t o r e d , and a program must be p r o v i d e d
f o r s e l e c t i n g t h e p r o p e r c u r v e and p r o v i d i n g t h e time
0885-8977/89/0700-1659$01.0001989 IEEE
1660
To s e r v e t h e f u n c t i o n p r e v i o u s l y p r o v i d e d by t h e
use
of
curves,
a computer
must
provide
time
c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o t h e i n p u t c u r r e n t and r e l a y s e t t i n g
f o r expected o p e r a t i n g c o n d i t i o n s .
On o c c a s i o n , i t
may be r e q u i r e d t o d e t e r m i n e t h e time d i a l s e t t i n g f o r
a g i v e n o p e r a t i n g time a t a s p e c i f i c m u l t i p l e o f
pick-up c u r r e n t . The two b a s i c a p p r o a c h e s t h a t can be
used t o perform t h e s e f u n c t i o n s a r e d i r e c t d a t a
s t o r a g e and c u r v e f i t t i n g .
These a p p r o a c h e s a r e
described i n t h i s section.
The p r o c e d u r e s n e c e s s a r y
f o r implementing t h e s e a r e a l s o d e s c r i b e d .
1.
-
D i r e c t Data S t o r a g e
D i r e c t d a t a s t o r a g e approach c o n s i s t s of s t o r i n g ,
i n computer memory, c o o r d i n a t e s of t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s
for data points a t pre-selected
intervals.
The
computer program selects d a t a p o i n t s a d j a c e n t t o t h e
e x p e c t e d v a l u e of c u r r e n t .
If t h e c u r r e n t d o e s n o t
c o r r e s p o n d t o a v a l u e s t o r e d i n t h e computer, i n t e r p o l a t i o n i s used t o d e t e r m i n e t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g time.
1661
If t h e c u r r e n t - t i m e c u r v e s have r e l a t i v e l y s m a l l
c u r v a t u r e , t h e i n t e r v a l s between a d j a c e n t d a t a p o i n t s
s t o r e d i n computer memory may be made r e l a t i v e l y
large.
O t h e r w i s e , t h e i q t e r v a l s between a d j a c e n t
p o i n t s must be d e c r e a s e d , o r h i g h e r o r d e r i n t e r p o l a t i o n must be used. The i n t e r v a l s i z e and t h e method
of i n t e r p o l a t i o n s h o u l d be determined by s t u d y i n g e a c h
individual
situation.
Where
the
devices a r e
a d j u s t a b l e , d a t a f o r d i f f e r e n t s e t s of c u r v e s must be
stored.
I f adjustment is continuous, i n t e r p o l a t i o n
between sets o f d a t a must a l s o be used t o o b t a i n t h e
intermediate c h a r a c t e r i s t i c .
T h i s method i s p a r t i c u l a r l y a p p l i c a b l e t o d e v i c e s
t h a t have f i x e d c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s a n d / o r r e l a t i v e l y few
s e t t i n g s . Many e n g i n e e r s p r e f e r t h e u s e of t h i s method
because i t i s q u i t e g e n e r a l and can be a p p l i e d t o a
v a r i e t y of d e v i c e s .
However, f o r d e v i c e s t h a t u s e
wide r a n g e o f a d j u s t m e n t s , s u c h a s r e l a y s , t h e comp u t e r memory r e q u i r e d f o r s t o r a g e becomes e x c e s s i v e .
2.
Curve-Fitting
The a l t e r n a t i v e t o e x t e n s i v e d a t a s t o r a g e i s t o
d e v e l o p f o r m u l a s t h a t would produce c u r v e s f i t t i n g
c l o s e l y t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of t h e d e v i c e .
Problems
of t h i s t y p e have been e n c o u n t e r e d f r e q u e n t l y i n
computer a p p l i c a t i o n s and e x t e n s i v e l i t e r a t u r e on t h e
s u b j e c t h a s been p u b l i s h e d i n t h e p a s t ,
The p r o c e s s
c o n s i s t s of s e l e c t i n g an e q u a t i o n t h a t h a s t h e d e s i r e d
g e n e r a l s h a p e o v e r t h e r e q u i r e d r a n g e and t h e n f i n d i n g
t h e c o e f f i c i e n t s t h a t produce a s a t i s f a c t o r y f i t .
An e x t e n s i v e s t u d y of t h e s u b j e c t was conducted by
an Edison E l e c t r i c I n s t i t u t e P r o j e c t Team. T h i s work
c u l m i n a t e d i n t h e p u b l i c a t i o n of a u s e r s Guide f o r t h e
E E I Members.
The s u g g e s t e d f o r m u l a s were i n t e n d e d t o
f a c i l i t a t e c o o r d i n a t i o n of r e l a y s w i t h p r e s e l e c t e d
downstream d e v i c e s .
Other i n v e s t i g a t o r s s u g g e s t e d
alternative
formulas
that
reproduce
relay
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s with acceptable accuracy.
Some I m p o r t a n t C o n s i d e r a t i o n s
S t u d y o f t h e p a s t work s u g g e s t s t h a t t h e e q u a t i o n s
f o r r e p r e s e n t i n g c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of a d e v i c e depend
s u b s t a n t i a l l y on t h e form of t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c .
The c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of o v e r c u r r e n t r e l a y s a r e
g e n e r a l l y t h o u g h t of a s c u r v e s based d i r e c t l y on t e s t s
and t h e r e f o r e t h e o p e r a t i n g t i m e s a r e e x p e c t e d t o be
A small margin
t h e a v e r a g e o r most p r o b a b l e v a l u e s .
t o a l l o w f o r t h e v a r i a t i o n s of o p e r a t i n g times s h o u l d
be a l l o w e d when c o o r d i n a t i o n of r e l a y s i s a t t e m p t e d .
S i n c e any of t h e r e l a y t y p e s may be used w i t h
c i r c u i t b r e a k e r s of d i f f e r e n t o p e n i n g time, t h e
computer program s h o u l d i n c l u d e i n p u t d a t a t o p r o v i d e
t h e c i r c u i t b r e a k e r i n f o r m a t i o n f o r each c a s e . Where
c i r c u i t b r e a k e r o p e n i n g time can be d e f i n e d as a
f u n c t i o n o f f a u l t c u r r e n t , c o n s i d e r a t i o n may be g i v e n
t o i n c l u d i n g t h i s v a r i a t i o n i n t h e computer i n p u t , f o r
a small i n c r e a s e i n accuracy.
The T r i p p i n g C h a r a c t e r i s t i c
curves f o r
the
c o m b i n a t i o n of c i r c u i t b r e a k e r s and r e l a y s have seldom
been p l o t t e d and used.
The t o t a l t r i p p i n g t i m e f o r a
s p e c i f i c f a u l t c u r r e n t , o b t a i n e d by combining t h e time
of t h e r e l a y , c i r c u i t b r e a k e r , and any o t h e r d e v i c e s
i n c l u d e d , would c o n s t i t u t e a p o i n t on s u c h a c u r v e .
The t i m e - c u r r e n t c h a r a c t e r i s t i c t h a t h a s t o be handled
by t h e computer i s t h e t r i p p i n g c h a r a c t e r i s t i c of t h e
r e l a y s alone.
The time a d d i t i o n s f o r t h e o t h e r
d e v i c e s w i l l d i f f e r and s o must be added by t h e
computer, a s s e l e c t e d by t h e i n p u t d a t a .
The program
can be a d a p t e d t o h a n d l e t h e s e i n p u t s , whether
constant or variable.
I f t h e time d i a l s e t t i i g i s r e q u i r e d b e f o r e t h e
r e l a y i s t e s t e d , a c o n v e r s i o n from time t o t i m e - l e v e r
must be made.
The s i m p l e s t method i s t o u s e a c u r v e
showing t h e r e l a t i o n between t i m e - l e v e r p o s i t i o n and
t h e o p e r a t i n g time a t t h e s e l e c t e d c u r r e n t .
With t h e
a s s u m p t i o n s u n d e r l y i n g t h e method d e s c r i b e d , o n l y a
s i n g l e s u c h c u r v e is r e q u i r e d f o r e a c h r e l a y t y p e . I t
can be p r e p a r e d e a s i l y by u s i n g a s e t of time p o i n t s
r e a d from t h e c o n v e n t i o n a l r e l a y c u r v e s f o r s e l e c t e d
currents.
An e q u a t i o n f o r s u c h a c u r v e c o u l d be
d e r i v e d , s o t h a t t h e c o n v e r s i o n c o u l d be made by t h e
computer program, b u t s e t t i n g o f t h e r e l a y by t e s t
time p r o v i d e s g r e a t e r a c c u r a c y , and i s l i k e l y t o be
p r e f e r r e d by most u s e r s , s o t h a t a h i g h l y a c c u r a t e
c u r v e is not e s s e n t i a l .
IMPLEMENTATION
The c o n s i d e r a t i o n s i n v o l v e d i n t h e g e n e r a l u s e of
computers
for
the
applicatioc
of
overcurrent
p r o t e c t i v e d e v i c e s have been
developed
i? t h e
1662
p r e c e d i n g s e c t i o n s . Of t h e two methods f o r p e r f o r m i n g
t h e c a l c u l a t i o n s t h a t have been d e s c r i b e d , t h e working
group recommends t h a t t h e f o r m u l a method be a d o p t e d as
t h e p r e f e r r e d method f o r S e p a r a t e C i r c u i t B r e a k e r s ,
T r i p Devices and R e l a y s .
CURVE FITTING FORMULAS
Several
equations
have
been
suggested
for
representing
the time-current
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of
o v e r c u r r e n t r e l a y s . These e q u a t i o n s can be c l a s s i f i e d
i n two c a t e g o r i e s .
The f i r s t c a t e g o r y i s t h a t of t h e
e x p o n e n t i a l e q u a t i o n s and t h e second c a t e g o r y i s t h a t
of t h e polynomial e q u a t i o n s .
Some of t h e s u g g e s t e d
equations a r e presented i n t h i s section.
The
l i m i t a t i o n s of t h e e q u a t i o n s a r e a l s o d i s c u s s e d .
T h i s model p r o v i d e s e q u a t i o n s t h a t r e p r o d u c e t h e
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of i n v e r s e time o v e r c u r r e n t r e l a y s
q u i t e a c c u r a t e l y e x c e p t t h a t i t h a s two d i s a d v a n t a g e s .
The f i r s t d i s a d v a n t a g e i s t h a t a c h a r a c t e r i s t i c
p r o v i d e d by t h i s e q u a t i o n i s n o t a s y m p t o t i c t o t h e
pickup c u r r e n t .
The second d i s a d v a n t a g e is t h a t t h e
r e l a y o p e r a t i n g time d o e s n o t d e c r e a s e m o n o t o n i c a l l y
as t h e c u r r e n t i n c r e a s e s .
For example, i f t h e
c o e f f i c i e n t s of t h e e q u a t i o n are d e t e r m i n e d u s i n g
t i m e - c u r r e n t v a l u e s from 2 t o 30 times t h e s e t v a l u e
of t h e r e l a y c u r r e n t , t h e r e s u l t i n g e q u a t i o n w i l l
model
the r e l a y c h a r a c t e r i s t i c
in that
range.
However, t h e r e l a y o p e r a t i n g times can exceed t h e
s e l e c t e d maximum v a l u e of 30 pu and t h e o p e r a t i n g time
c a l c u l a t e d f o r t h o s e c u r r e n t s w i l l n o t be c a l c u l a t e d
c o r r e c t l y ; t h e c a l c u l a t e d time would be more t h a n t h e
r e l a y o p e r a t i n g time.
Exponential Equations
A . R . van C . Warrington [ 2 ] proposed E q u a t i o n 1 f o r
c a l c u l a t i n g t h e c o n t a c t c l o s i n g time of i n v e r s e t i m e
Later, Hieber C71 proposed
overcurrent relays.
E q u a t i o n 2 f o r t h e same purpose.
The E E I p r o j e c t team s u g g e s t e d t h e u s e o f a
polynomial e q u a t i o n t h a t e x p r e s s e s t h e l o g a r i t h m o f
t h e r e l a y o p e r a t i n g time a s a f u n c t i o n o f t h e
l o g a r i t h m of t h e r e l a y c u r r e n t i n m u l t i p l e s of t h e s e t
values.
The s u g g e s t e d e q u a t i o n h a s been r e p o r t e d i n
t h e l i t e r a t u r e by G.E. Radke C91 and is as f o l l o w s .
l o g (T
DC)
a.
a, ( l o g I)
+ a3 (log I
T = C +
-b
(I-h+w
where:
(-1
1 "
(2)
50
T is t h e c o n t a c t c l o s i n g time i n s e c o n d s o r
cycles,
I i s t h e r e l a y c u r r e n t i n m u l t i p l e s of t h e t a p
setting,
K i s t h e d e s i g n c o n s t a n t of t h e r e l a y ,
m i s t h e time d i a l s e t t i n g ,
n i s a c o n s t a n t f o r t h e r e l a y and
C i s a c o n s t a n t which a c c o u n t s f o r t h e e f f e c t
of f r i c t i o n and h y s t e r e s i s of t h e m a g n e t i c
circuit.
Polynomial E q u a t i o n s
Polynomial e q u a t i o n s have a l s o been s u g g e s t e d by
s e v e r a l i n v e s t i g a t o r s f o r modeling t h e time c u r r e n t
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of i n v e r s e time o v e r c u r r e n t r e l a y s .
One of t h e p o l y n o m i a l s s u g g e s t e d by R.E. A l b r e c h t e t
a 1 [5] is as f o l l o w s .
a j i , m, n and k a r e c o n s t a n t s
(4)
a 3 ( l o g 113
a4
n4
...
(5)
...
(log
T = a
O
+ - +a-l+ - + - + . . .a 2
(1-1)
(I-I)~
a3
(1-1)3
a4
(1-1) 4
a
a
+
~
+ 2 ..
+2+...
T = a
1-1
1~-1
I~-I
E q u a t i o n s 5 and 6 e x p r e s s t h e l o g a r i t h m of time as a
polynomial of t h e l o g a r i t h m o f t h e r e l a y c u r r e n t
whereas E q u a t i o n s 7 and 8 e x p r e s s time as a f u n c t i o n
of t h e r e l a y c u r r e n t . These e q u a t i o n s can be used t o
model t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of i n v e r s e time o v e r c u r r e n t
The r e l a y
r e l a y s f o r a s e l e c t e d time d i a l s e t t i n g .
c u r v e s a t o t h e r time d i a l s e t t i n g s can be o b t a i n e d i n
two d i f f e r e n t ways.
One p o s s i b l e p r o c e d u r e i s t o u s e
a d i f f e r e n t model f o r e a c h time d i a l s e t t i n g and s t o r e
t h e c o e f f i c i e n t s f o r each r e l a y i n a two d i m e n s i o n a l
matrix.
Another p o s s i b l e approach is t o d e v e l o p a
composite model i n t h e f o l l o w i n g t h r e e s t e p s .
1.
where:
) +~ a,, ( l o g I)
T h i s e q u a t i o n a l s o h a s t h e drawbacks of t h e e q u a t i o n
s u g g e s t e d by R.E. A l b r e c t e t a1 C51.
The a c c u r a c y o f t h e o v e r c u r r e n t r e l a y s marketed a t
t h i s time i s 5 t o 10 p e r c e n t of t h e p u b l i s h e d c u r v e s .
The c o e f f i c i e n t s d e t e r m i n e d from t h e d a t a t a k e n from
t h e p u b l i s h e d c u r v e s of t h e r e l a y s and t h e e q u a t i o n s
l i s t e d above p r o v i d e c u r v e s t h a t have t h e a c c u r a c i e s
of t h a t o r d e r .
a 2 ( l o g I)2
where:
b , h , q , and w are c o n s t a n t s .
These
equations
a r e of
the exponential
form.
E q u a t i o n 1 p r o v i d e s a good mathematical model of t h e
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of
overcurrent
relays
that
are
d e s i g n e d t o have c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of t h a t s h a p e .
For
example, t h e European r e l a y s can b e modeled by t h i s
e q u a t i o n a d e q u a t e l y . Also, i t is p o s s i b l e t o f i n d t h e
c o e f f i c i e n t s of t h e e q u a t i o n f o r a r e l a y w i t h minimal
effort.
E q u a t i o n 2 i s a l s o s u i t a b l e f o r modeling
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of i n v e r s e time o v e r c u r r e n t r e l a y s
e x c e p t t h a t f i n d i n g t h e c o e f f i c i e n t s of t h e e q u a t i o n
is q u i t e i n v o l v e d .
Develop a model of t h e r e l a y c h a r a c t e r i s t i c i n
t h e form of time a s a f u n c t i o n o f t h e r e l a y
1663
3.
+ bl
(TDS) + b2 (TDS)2
b3 (TDS)3. ( 9 )
T = c
C2
(TDS)
c3
(TDS)~
time of t h e T r i p p i n g C h a r a c t e r i s t i c .
The program f o r d e t e r m i i i n g t h e c o e f f i c i e n t s o f
t h e e q u a t i o n s is s i m p l e enough t h a t i t can be
The
programmed and r u n on a p e r s o n a l computer.
c o n s t a n t s f o r t h e f a m i l y of r e l a y s can be s t o r e d on a
d i s k e t t e and a
f i e l d engineer,
checking r e l a y
performance, c a n r e a d t h e s t o r e d i n f o r m a t i o n and u s e
i t without d i f f i c u l t y .
I n s t a n t a n e o u s e l e m e n t s , and s e p a r a t e i n s t a n t a n e o u s
and
fixed
time-delay
relays
can
generally
be
c o n s i d e r e d a s h a v i n g a f i x e d o p e r a t i n g time b e c a u s e
c o o r d i n a t i o n i s g e n e r a l l y not r e q u i r e d near pickup,
where t h e time v a r i e s s u b s t a n t i a l l y . Thus t h e y can be
i n c l u d e d , i f d e s i r e d , i n t h e computer a p p l i c a t i o n
program, u s i n g a s i m p l e r formula.
ACCURACY CONSIDERATIONS
Every e t f o r t s h o u l d be made t o p r o v i d e t h e
g r e a t e s t a c c u r a c y p o s s i b l e i n t h e r e s u l t s p r o v i d e d by
t h e s e programs.
However, many f a c t o r s a f f e c t t h e
modeling p r o c e s s , and t h e a c c u r a c y p o s s i b l e i n t h e
v a r i o u s p a r t s is widely d i f f e r e n t .
I t is of l i t t l e
v a l u e t o s e e k e x t r e m e a c c u r a c y , w i t h added work and
c o s t , i n one p a r t of t h e p r o c e s s i f i n a c c u r a c i e s
elsewhere n u l l i f y t h e b e n e f i t s .
The f u n c t i o n s
performed by t h e computer can be c a r r i e d o u t w i t h
g r e a t a c c u r a c y b u t t h e r e s u l t s a r e no b e t t e r t h a n t h e
d a t a used.
I n some o f t h e p a s t work a s many a s 70
d a t a p o i n t s p e r r e l a y c u r v e have been r e a d and
entered.
I n n e a r l y e y e r y c a s e t h e c u r v e h a s modest
c u r v a t u r e , w i t h o u t p o i n t s of s e v e r e i n f l e c t i o n , s o
that
the
close
spacing of
points
contributes
e s s e n t i a l l y n o t h i n g t o t h e f i n a l a c c u r a c y of t h e
formula d e r i v e d . I n t h e p r e p a r a t l o n of p r e f e r r e d d a t a
f o r m a t s , two methods of e n t e r i n g d a t a p o i n t s a r e
proposed.
I n one o f t h e s e t h e c u r r e n t v a l u e s a r e
p r e s e l e c t e d , and O R l y t h e time v a l u e s a r e t o be
e n t e r e d , f o r u s e where t h e c u r v e s are smooth and
regular.
I n t h e o t h e r , b o t h c u r r e n t and time v a l u e s
are t o be e n t e r e d , and t h e p o i n t s p a c i n g can be
a d j u s t e d t o s u i t t h e s h a p e and c u r v a t u r e o f t h e c u r v e
being entered.
The a c c u r a c y o f t h e assumption t h a t t h e s h a p e s of
a l l t h e c u r v e s f o r a g i v e n r e l a y t y p e are t h e same may
n o t be a c c e p t a b l e . The o n l y check t h a t can be made i s
t o compare t h e r e s u l t s of tests w i t h t h e p r e d i c t i o n s
I f the
from t h e u s e of t h e f o r m u l a d e r i v e d .
derivations are consistent,
improvements i n t h e
?ormulas can be s o u g h t , b u t i f t h e y a r e random,
improvement
is u n l i k e l y .
The p a s t
experience
i n d i c a t e s t h a t , f o r c u r r e n t s above t w i c e p i c k u p , a
maximum e r r o r o f t h r e e c y c l e s and less t h a n f i v e
p e r c e n t of t h e r e l a y o p e r a t i r l g time s h o u l d be
expected.
T h i s r u l e may s e r v e u n t i l g r e a t e r
e x p e r i e n c e i s g a i n e d , and v a l u e s f o r i n d i v i d u a l r e l a y
t y p e s can be a s s i g n e d .
When t a b u l a t e d v a l u e s a r e used d i r e c t l y , t h e
adequacy Of i n t e r p o l a t i o n methods can be checked by
comparing t h e computed v a l u e s oC time f o r i n t e r m e d i a t e
v a l u e s o f c u r r e n t w i t h t h e c u r v e v a l u e s of time.
However, t h e o v e r a l l a c c u r a c y depends on t h e a c c u r a c y
oi? t h e c u r v e s .
RELAY DATA
1664
program
system.
1.
data
format
using
Type of r e l a y , i . e . ,
state, or static.
data
base
management
7.
J.E.
8.
9.
G.E.
Radke,
A
Method
for
Calculating
Time-Overcurrent
Relay
Settings
by
Digital
Computer.
Trans.
IEEE
( T P 63-919)
(Power
Apparatus
and Systems) v .
8 2 , 1963 S p e c i a l
Supplement, p. 189-205.
D i s c u s s i o n , T r a n s . IEEE,
(Power Apparatus and Systems) v. 8 5 , n . 3 , 1966,
p. 303-307.
H i e b e r , E m p i r i c a l E q u a t i o n s of O v e r c u r r e n t
Relay Curves f o r Computer A p p l i c a t i o n , I E E E C P
31-CP-65-90, 1965.
induction, plunger, s o l i d
2.
Relay c h a r a c t e r i s t i c ,
i.e.,
inverse, very
inverse,
extremely
inverse,
short
time,
d e f i n i t e time, or instantaneous.
3.
Manufacturer s name.
4.
Model number.
5.
Frequency, i . e . , 50 Hz o r 60 Hz.
6.
E f f e c t i v e d a t e of r e l a y d a t a .
7.
F i r s t year r e l a y manufactured.
8.
L a s t y e a r r e l a y manufactured ( i f a p p l i c a b l e ) .
9.
U n i t s used f o r t i m e , i . e . , s e c o n d s , o r c y c l e s .
1 1 . B r i t i s h S t a n d a r d s f o r P r o t e c t i v e R e l a y s B.S.
142:
1966.
10.
SUMMARY
The t i m e c o o r d i n a t i o n o f o v e r c u r r e n t p r o t e c t i v e
d e v i c e s r e q u i r e s t h e s e l e c t i o n of a b a s i c t r i p p i n g
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c which d e t e r m i n e s t h e s e t t i ng of t h e
r e l a y and which i s i n t e n d e d t o clear t h e f a u l t c u r r e n t
a t a s p e c i f i c l o c a t i o n i n a pre-determined t r i p time.
The
two
basic
methods
of
treating
relay
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , by i n t e r p o l a t i o n of t a b u l a t e d d a t a
and by t h e u s e o f c u r v e - f i t t i n g f o r m u l a s , may be
f i t t e d i n t o one o v e r a l l program and a change from one
method t o t h e o t h e r can be made w i t h o u t any change i n
the overall result.
Once t h e b a s i c programming h a s been i n s t a l l e d , t h e
computer system can be provided w i t h d a t a f o r a l l
r e l a y s used by a u t i l i t y , a l l a t one time, o r
g r a d u a l l y , t h e most e x t e n s i v e l y used r e l a y s b e i n g
included f i r s t .
BIBLIOGRAPHY
4.
A.R.
van C . W a r r i n g t o n , P r o t e c t i v e R e l a y s , T h e i r
Theory and P r a c t i c e , Vol. 11. ( C h a p t e r s 1 and 8 ) .
John Wiley and Sons, I n c . , N e w York, 1969.
5. T.E.
6. T.E.
DyLiacco, B.F.
W i r t z , and D . A .
Wheeler,
IEEE
Automation of t h e CE1 System f o r S e c u r i t y .
1971. P I C A Conference P r o c e e d i n g s , p . 93-101.
17. R . C .
Ender,
The Numerical R e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f
Time-Current
Characteristics.
The
Line,
McGraw-Edison Power Systems D i v i s i o n , 1972, No. 1 ,
p. 6-10.
F i r s t Q u a r t e r 1972.
1.
A.H.
Knable, A Computer Approach t o S e t t i n g
Directional
Overcurrent
Relays
on I n d u s t r i a l
Network Type Systems. A I E E C P 61-933, 1961.
2.
van C . W a r r i n g t o n , P r o t e c t i v e R e l a y s , T h e i r
Theory and P r a c t i c e , Vol. I ( C h a p t e r 4), John
Wiley and Sons, I n c . , New York, 1962.
3.
A . H . Knable, O v e r c u r r e n t Relays C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s i n
a Simple Form f o r Use i n D i g i t a l Computers. A I E E
CP 62-1090, 1962.
4.
5.
R.E.
Albrecht, M . J .
N i s j a , W.E.
F e e r o , G.D.
Rockefeller,
C.L.
Wagner,
Digital
Computer
P r o t e c t i v e Device C o o r d i q a t i o n Program I - General
Program D e s c r i p t i o n . T r a n s . I E E E (Power Apparatus
and Systems) v . 83, i o . 4, 1964, p. 402-411.
18. D . K .
A.R.
6. H . Y .
1665
IEE
q = m(dw/dt)+Dw
where:
(A. 1 )
q is t h e t o r q u e due t o c u r r e n t
w i s speed
t is time
D i s t h e damping f a c t o r
m is t h e moment o f i n e r t i a
is
(q/D)[t-(m/D)[l-D
(A.2)
time i n t e g r a l of
the
2
exp(-Dt/m)ll
this
(A.3)
t = (Dx/q)
(A. 4 )
m/D
I n e q u a t i o n (4) t h e e x p r e s s i o n f o r t o r q u e ( q ) c o n t a i n s
a d r i v i n g component p r o p o r t i o n a l t o t h e c u r r e n t
s q u a r e d and t h e r e s t r a i n i n g component ( q s )
q = k12
qs
(A. 5)
where k i s a p r o p o r t i o n a l i t y f a c t o r .
c u r r e n t i n terms of M m u l t i p l e s o f
gives:
kM211,2
qs
q = (M -l)qs
Expressing t h e
pickup c u r r e n t
(A. 6)
T h e r e f o r e k I l 1 2 = q and
(A.7)
T1/(MC-l) + To
S t a n d a r d C u r r e n t Values
Per U n i t
Current
w = (q/D)[l-exp(-Dt/m)]
(x)
APPENDIX 11:
S t a n d a r d C u r r e n t Values
I t ' s s o l u t i o n f o r c o n s t a n t t o r q u e is:
and t h e t r a v e l
equation:
The c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f e l e c t r o - m e c h a n i c a l
relays
deviate
from
the
theoretical
equation
because
s a t u r a t i o n of t h e m a g n e t i c c i r c u i t is used t o a f f e c t
t h e s h a p e o f c e r t a i n c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s and i n i n d u c t i o n
d i s k r e l a y s t h e s h a p e o f t h e d i s k is a l t e r e d t o o b t a i n
a more uniform c u r v e s h a p e t h r o u g h o u t t h e r a n g e of t h e
time d i a l a d j u s t m e n t .
Consequently, i t is necessary
t o r e s o r t t o curve f i t t i n g techniques f o r a c c u r a t e
representation.
( A . 8)
where: T1 = Dx/qs
To = m/D
( 1 .O)
1.25
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Logarithms
Value
Interval
0.00000
0.09691
.17609
.30103
.39794
.47712
0.09691
.07918
.12494
.09691
.07918
Per U n i t
Current
4.0
5.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
Logarithms
Value I n t e r v a l
0.60206
.69897
.77815
.go309
1.00000
0.12494
.09691
.07918
.12494
.09691
For l a r g e r c u r r e n t v a l u e s , t h o s e l i s t e d
m u l t i p l i e d by 1 0 , which a d d s 1 t o e a c h l o g a r i t h m .
are
I t may be n o t e d t h a t t h e l o g a r i t h m i c i n t e r v a l s
v a r y from 0.09691 t o 0.12494, and r e p e a t . I t would be
p r e f e r a b l e t o e q u a l i z e them, b u t t h i s i s d i f f i c u l t t o
I t would g e n e r a l l y be
accomplish p r a c t i c a l l y .
a c c e p t e d t h a t 1.0 and 2.0 u n i t s o f c u r r e n t s h o u l d be
i n c l u d e d i n any s t a n d a r d l i s t .
I f two i n t e r m e d i a t e
p o i n t s were i n c l u d e d , a t e q u a l l o g a r i t h m i c i n t e r v a l s ,
t h e i n t e r m e d i a t e c u r r e n t v a l u e s would be a p p r o x i m a t e l y
1.26 and 1 . 5 9 , which would be i n c o n v e n i e n t t o u s e . I f
o n l y one i n t e r m e d i a t e v a l u e were u s e d , w i t h e q u a l
l o g a r i t h m i c i n t e r v a l s , i t would be d2 = 1 . 4 1 4 .
Again
t h i s i s n o t a c o n v e n i e n t v a l u e t o r e a d from t h e
a v a i l a b l e c u r v e s o r f o r t a b u l a t i o n . The l i s t proposed
u s e s p o i n t s t h a t may be r e a d i l y d e t e r m i n e d from most
available time-current curves.
For v a l u e s above 1 0 ,
u s i n g t h e l i s t e d v a l u e s m u l t i p l i e d by 1 0 , t h e p o i n t s
a r e e q u a l l y c o n v e n i e n t , a s may be s e e n by examining a
typical set o f curves.
The l o g a r i t h m i c i n t e r v a l s
r e t a i n t h e same p a t t e r n between s u c c e s s i v e c u r r e n t
values.
APPENDIX 111:
F i n d i n g t h e Equation
Time-current C h a r a c t e r i s t i c
f o r an I n v e r s e
Relay O p e r a t i n g
Time i n Seconds
5.10
I666
Relay O p e r a t i n g
Time i n Seconds
3.50
2.60
2.10
1.80
1.58
1.33
1.20
1.10
1.02
0.95
0.87
0.81
0.77
0.73
0.70
Current i n Multiples
of t h e Relay S e t t i n g
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
The
product
[AIT[Al
is a
5x5 m a t r i x .
Now
p r e m u l t i p l y i n g w i t h t h e i n v e r s e of t h i s 5x5 m a t r i x
p r o v i d e s t h e v e c t o r of unknowns as f o l l o w s .
0.27114
11.04271
- 76.03267
254.34684
-206.99665
These a r e t h e c o e f f i c i e n t s of t h e polynomial p r o v i d e d
by t h e l e a s t e r r o r s q u a r e s c u r v e f i t t i n g t e c h n i q u e .
Sachdev and B a r i b e a u [24] used t h i s approach i n power
system p r o t e c t i o n f o r o n l i n e e s t i m a t i o n of v o l t a g e and
c u r r e n t phasors.
More d e t a i l s o f t h e t e c h n i q u e a r e
g i v e n i n some t e x t b o o k s [251.
Now c o n s i d e r t h a t t h e r e l a y c h a r a c t e r i s t i c h a s t o be
modelled i n t h e form of E q u a t i o n 8.
The f i r s t
current-time
r e l a t i o n s h i p provides
the following
equation.
+%+
A
3 +
:
2
3
2.5-1
( 2 . 5 ) -1
( 2 . 5 ) -1
+--
(A.9)
- 5.10
( 2 . 5 ) -1
Completing
equation.
a
the
arithmatic
0.6667 a l
0.02627 all
provides
0.19048 a 2
=
the
0.06838 a 3
(A.10)
5.10
second
c u r r e n t - t ime
Similarly, t h e
provides t h e following equation.
a
0.5000 a l + 0.1250 a 2
Continuing
equations.
1 .ooooo
1 .ooooo
1 100000
1 .ooooo
1 .ooooo
1 .ooooo
1 .ooooo
1 .ooooo
1 .ooooo
1 .ooooo
1 .ooooo
1 .ooooo
1 .ooooo
1 .ooooo
1 .ooooo
1 .ooooo
this
procedure
0.66667
0.50000
0.40000
0.33333
0.28571
0.25000
0.20000
0.16667
0.14286
0.12500
0.1111 1
0.09091
0.07692
0.06667
0.05882
0.05263
0.19048
0.12500
0.08889
0.06667
0.051 95
0.04167
0.02857
0.02083
0.01587
0.01 250
0.01010
0.00699
0.0051 3
0.00392
0.00310
0.00251
following
r el a t i onshi p
0.03846 a 3
(A.11)
provides
the
0.06838
0.03846
0.02388
0.01587
0.01 110
0.00806
0.00465
0.00292
0.001 96
0.00137
0.00100
0.00058
0.00036
0.00024
0.0001 7
0.0001 3
following
5.10000
3.50000
2.60000
2.10000
1 .80000
1 .58000
1 .33000
1 .20000
1.10000
1 .02000
0.95000
0.87000
0.81000
0.77000
0.73000
0.70000
0.02627
0.01250
0.00671
0.00392
0.00244
0.00160
0.00077
0.00042
0.00024
0.00015
0.00010
0.00005
0.00003
0.00002
0.00001
0.00001
[AI
I n t h i s e q u a t i o n , t h e m a t r i x [ A ] i s a 16x5 m a t r i x , [XIi s a 5x1 v e c t o r and
[ b l i s a 16x1 v e c t o r .
P r e m u l t i p l v i n g both s i d e s of E q u a t i o n A.12 w i t h t h e
t r a n s p o s e of [ A ] p r o v i d e s t h e f o l l o w i n g e q u a t i o n .
1-
16.00000
3.52730
0.6741 7
0.17914
0.05524
3.52730
1.25070
0.28827
0.08694
0.02915
0.67417
0.28827
0 .G7055
0.02218
0.00766
0.17914
0.08694
0.0221 8
0.00720
0.00255
0.05524
0.02915
0.00766
0.00255
0.00092
26.16000
8.92800
2.05946
0.62687
0.21248
1667
Discussion
+-I a.-
. AIfor AI
4 1
5.
xf
a-
A I J = iJ
Now as AI
-+
0, T
-+
+ 03 only if
f: ?J> O
j=i
If not, T
- 03
The coefficients obtained through least square fit should satisfy 1 to
ensure proper asymptotic behavior.
In the example shown in Appendix III
-+
j=i
af=6
J
REPRESENTATION OF
OVERCURRENT
RELAY
CHARACTERISTICS WORKING GROUP: The Working Group is
grateful to Dr. Ramasany Ramaswami for his interest in
COMPUTER
a4
x+GT+z
1
a 4 1 x
is
let I = 1 AI.
=%+-
a3
which
=j
a2
polynomial