Chapter - 1: 1.1 Compression Ratio
Chapter - 1: 1.1 Compression Ratio
Chapter - 1: 1.1 Compression Ratio
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Homogeneous
Heterogeneous
Once the fuel vapour - air mixture is ignited at a point, a flame front
appears and rapidly spreads in the mixture. The flame propagation is caused by
heat transfer and diffusion of burning fuel molecules from the combustion zone to
the adjacent layer of the fresh mixture. The flame front is a narrow zone separating
the fresh mixture from the combustion products.
Air fuel ratio is the most important engine variable which affects not
only the concentration of NOx emissions but also the performance of the engine.
The NOx emission increases to peak the value as the mixture strength varies from
rich to near about stoichiometric and then decreases as the mixture strength
approaches leaner range. On the rich side, NO x emission is less, but at the
expenses of more fuel consumption, increased CO and un-burnt hydrocarbon
emission.
1200
1800
2400
Max.
Peak NOx
Min.bsfc
Max.
PPM
kg/s-hr
bhp metric
1288
0.26
2.67
565
10
688
0.27
2.60
575
20
438
0.30
2.57
580
30
225
0.32
2.54
590
2181
0.26
5.70
625
10
1087
0.27
5.40
650
20
650
0.30
5.20
680
30
403
0.33
5.94
635
2735
0.34
6.60
675
10
1400
0.36
5.86
680
20
913
0.39
5.70
695
30
662
0.42
4.50
705
% cycle
exhaust
temp oC
N2 + O2
2NO
The reverse reaction is also possible and occurs in the entire range
of the temperature, useful for the production of NO and the decomposition is
almost complete around 4400
decomposition are the same, because there is no pressure effect in this reaction.
In I.C. engines, due to the frozen equilibrium, the maximum temperature alone in
responsible for the formation of NO x as consider on the basis of thermodynamic
equilibrium. The data of experimental results on IC engine exhaust are given in
tables 1.2 and 1.3, which shows that NO x may increases toemarkably high
concentrations depending upon.
Type of engine.
Air-Fuel ratio.
Compression ratio.
Quality of air.
Engine rpm.
Engine load.
Engine temperature.
Quality of fuel
Diesel engine
---
0.01
---
---
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.03
60
850
240
30
10
20
10
30
The main objective of the project is to find out the optimum flow rate
of air intake according to its load conditions in twin cylinder DI diesel engine, in
order to achieve the mixing quality of air-fuel mixture. The CFD simulation
software FLUENT is used to predict the NO x emission level for various flow rate of
air intake inside the combustion chamber. Based on the CFD results, optimum flow
rate is determined, at which the emission level is minimized. The following points
are considered as the scope of the project.
Due to this project, the emission level will be reduced through the quality
mixture strength and the engine performance also will be improved.
After the actual planning of chapter 6, all the simulation results will
be shown and discussed in chapter 7. Moreover, this chapter will contain all
relevant tabulation and graph for the discussion. Finally the conclusion will be
made in chapter 8 by concluding the overall results obtained as well as the
knowledge learned from the project.
CHAPTER -2
LITERATURE SURVEY
10
11
enhances mixing and probably produces a leaning effect, soot production was
reduced and soot oxidation was increased, resulting in a reduction in soot
emissions. The overall combustion duration was also shortened, which reduced
fuel consumption. However, although an increase in swirl always improved the
premixed combustion phase, an excess of swirl damaged the diffusion controlled
combustion phase, increasing soot emissions and fuel consumption, but reducing
NOx emissions. In this study, the optimum swirl value had been found for each
engine operating mode. However, it can be concluded that there is no single
optimum value of swirl ratio for the whole engine operating range, and matching
the level of swirl with other parameters is a task that also depends on the
combustion chamber geometry and injection characteristics. Nevertheless, the
results obtained from the study can shed light on the swirl effects on diesel engine
combustion and exhaust emissions over a wide range of engine operating
conditions. [3]
12
The result from this study shows that, the variable swirl for a specific
valve lift, there is an increase in angular velocity for 70% opening of the intake port
and decrease in angular velocity for 50 % opening of the port is clearly predicted
by this model. Therefore the model has an application in improving the swirl
generating capacity of the port and evolution/distribution of the in-cylinder swirl
during intake process according to emission norms.
1) It can provide ways to design high swirl generation capacity intake
port which reduces both NO x and particulates the two main pollutants in diesel
engines, which is very necessary to attain Euro IV emission norm.
2) The increase in the swirl generating capacity of the port due to
variable swirl plate ensures better combustion even with less amount of oxygen.
For optimum design of the variable swirl plate, this methodology can be used.
3) The results indicate that the CFD model can be used as a tool to
understand the effect of various parts of air intake system for optimization. This
effect will reduce the number of experiments to be carried out for arriving at final
optimized system.
13
14
of which serves to control the swirl ratio by varying the flow rate. Several variations
of this type of intake port system are conceivable depending on the types and
configurations of the intake ports that are selected.
15
2. An intake port layout (A1) combining this type of helical port with a
tangential port has resulted in a variable swirl intake port system capable of
varying the swirl ratio over a wide range from 3.5 to 10. [8]
Kang and Reitz had described the intake flow structure using various
port geometries in a four valve heavy duty diesel engine. Swirl ratio, LDV
measurements of bulk flow and turbulence, and flow visualization experiments
were conducted on a steady state bench rig. In addition to the standard production
port, archetypal intake port flows were created using intake valve shrouds. These
flow types are usually not found in heavy duty engines, which typically quiescent
combustion chamber designs. However recent CFD analyses have indicated that
intake flow structures can significantly influence engine pollutant emissions. Thus,
it was of interest to characterize these floes in a heavy duty engine. The measured
swirl and axial velocity components were analyzed to reveal the swirl and tumble
generation mechanisms, and the LDV data compared favorably with the swirl
meter results. The flow visualization confirmed the existence of flow recirculation
regions under the intake valves also seen in the LDV data. These flow structures
help to explain the origins of the overall swirl and tumble flow fields. The results
were compared with available CFD predictions made using the same port
configurations. The measured swirl levels were founds to agree with the CFD
trends. However, in some cases quantitative differences were found, presumably
due to the effect of piston motion in the actual engine. These differences need to
be accounted for when evaluating port designs from steady-flow measurements,
especially in cases with high tumble flow components. [9]
16
directly against engine tests. Encouraging agreement was found for both the in
cylinder pressure and NOx emissions. [12]
All the reviews will provide the required information related to the
project such as project methodology, analysis from FLUENT and experimental
validation. The following information was extracted from throughout the literature
survey and review that helps to identify and solve the problem.
17
CHAPTER-3
PROBLEM DEFINITION
Large diesel engines are widely used for stationary power generation and
ship propulsion. But it is important to reduce their emissions to a reasonable level
18
because diesel engines are one of the major sources for air pollution. Recently,
the maximum quantities of oxides of nitrogen (NO x) are limited for marine
applications by the IMO regulation. In case of land installations for generating
electricity, there are many different regulations specific to the various countries and
regions. It has become clear that the development of diesel engines must
concentrate on reducing exhaust gas emissions. Many methods for reduction of
the emissions, especially for NOx, however have a contradictory effect on fuel oil
consumption of an engine. It is desirable to reduce both fuel oil consumption and
NOx emission at the same time for a competitive engine.
The experimental data in table 3.1 shows the various emissions of the twin
cylinder engine under various load conditions have been tabulated below.
Table.3.1 Emission levels under loading
Load/Parameter
s
CO(% by vol)
CO2(% by vol)
O2(% by vol)
HC(ppm)
NOx(ppm)
0 kw
1.5 kw
3 kw
4.5 kw
6 kw
5.442
0.08
2.7
17.4
65
93
5.521
0.08
2.6
17.3
75
80
5.579
0.08
2.5
17.3
78
66
5.612
0.09
2.5
17.4
81
61
5.620
009
2.5
17.4
78
56
It is the evident from the table values that the NO x emissions find the major
portion of the emission levels and it is also observed that at higher loads level NO x
reduces.
19
20
The table5.1 shows the emissions from diesel engine at various load
conditions the effects of these emissions are discussed in this chapter. From this it
21
can be concluded that the effect of NOx plays a major role in the performance of
the engine. Thus the main objective of the project is to reduce these NO x levels.
CHAPTER-4
COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
22
The procedures for the CFD analysis in FLUENT follows the simple steps
below
The model used for the analysis is drawn, method and boundary
layers are determined. This is done using the GAMBIT software,
which is the compatible modelling software for FLUENT. All the files
for the geometry and meshing of the model are saved as mesh or
grid file.
Next, in FLUENT, saved mesh or grid file model is read, checked and
scaled for the required working unit.
23
The model is defined for the type of solve and boundary conditions to
be used. The model is defined according to the type of analysis
Next, the following section will discuss on the governing equations used in
FUENT when computing and analyzing the fluid flow behaviour. All the equations
will give the details on how the CFD works in order to simulate the result for certain
problems.
4.1 CAPABILITIES OF FLENT SOLVER
This software has various modeling capabilities that can be used in
numerous
Flows in 2d and 3d geometries are using unstructured solutionacaptive triangular/tetrahedral, quadrilateral/hexahedral, or mixed
24
All the capabilities mentioned above are in providing a better approach for
the analysis in applications such as process equipment, aerospace and turbo
machinery automobile, heat exchanger power generation in oil/gas industry and
material processing. Therefore, with the availability of such capabilities, the
analysis for the purpose of this object can be carried out in a more accurate and
user friendly way.
4.2 GOVERNING EQUATIONS
The CFD methodology in Fluent is used partial differential
equations of
analysis concerning the fluid flow. Among flow the variables that are commonly used in
analysis are mass, momentum, energy, species concentrations, quantities of turbulence
and mixture fractions. Therefore, the governing equations to be used in this analysis all
the conservation of mass, momentum, energy, equations.
4.2.1 MASS CONSERVATION EQUATION
The continuity equation or the mass conservation equation for any fluid flow
is expressed as in equation (4.1)
Where,
Fluid density
Ui
25
Where
-Fluid density
Ui & Uj
velocity
P
-Static Pressure
tij
-stress tensor
gi
Fi
Where
keff
-effective conductivity
keff
Sh
26
Spalart-allmaras model
Standard k- model
Renormalization-group(RNG)k- model
Realizable stress model(RSM)
Large eddy simulation(les) model
For this project, the simulation is using the standard k- model as the
preferred turbulent model. Basically, this is using two transport equations in partial
differential form to govern the transport of turbulent kinetic energy, k and its
dissipation rate, . It is assuming that the flow in the system is fully turbulent and
the effects of molecular viscosity are negligible. Therefore, the standard k
model is only valid for fully turbulent flows.
The segregated solver is chosen as the most appropriate solver for this
project because it operates by solving the governing equations sequentially until
27
the solution converged. The solver will iterate the solution loop according to the
user specification of the number of iterations to be performed in order to get the
final solution, which will converge at end of the iteration.
As for the coupled solver, this method solves all the continuity
equations simultaneously are coupled together. The procedure is similar to the
segregated method, where several iterations are solved for the coupled governing
equations before a converged solution is obtained. As mentioned earlier,
segregated solution method is chosen for the simulation task in this project,
therefore next section will discuss on the discretization method used for this solver.
28
29
CHAPTER-5
EXPERIMENTAL READINGS
5.1ENGINE CONFIGURATION
30
Value
85.0
Stroke (mm)
155.0
Displacement (cc)
1759
Number of cylinder
118.1
1500
0.25
Power
13.8kw (18.7Hp)
Fuel type
Diesel
ii.
iii.
by the authorities.
Measurement of peak opacity during free acceleration
Measurement principle -
Infrared measurement
31
Measurement
parameters
parameters
Engine speed
Oil temperature
CO
CO2
HC
O2
250.800 rpm
0.120C
0.10% by vol.
0.20% by vol.
0.20000 ppm vol.
0.4% by vol.
10rpm
1C
0.01% by vol
0.01% by vol
1 ppm vol.
0.001% by vol.
NO
4.22% by vol.
0.4000 ppm vol.
0.1% by vol.
1 ppm vol.
Measurement principle
4/5- Gas Measuring Instruments -
-O2, NO -
Resolution
Electrical measurement
Calibration interval
-12 months
Rated flow rate
- 360 1/h
Minimum flow rate
- 180 1/h
Total flow rate
- 180.5001/h
Calibration gas flow rate
- 90.180 1/h
32
Applied load
A(amps)
0
15
3
4.5
6
1
2
3
4
5
V(volt)
250
250
250
250
250
consumption
T2
Tavg
25
25.5
18
18
16
16
14
14
13
13
Fuel consumption
Fc (kg/s)
6.51*10-4
9.22*10-4
1.04*10-3
1.19*10-3
1.28*10-3
The table showed above mentions various fuel consumption values for
different input parameters of applied load and time for 20cc of fuel consumption.
The fuel consumption values thus obtained are taken as input values for CFD
analysis.
33
CHAPTER-6
METHODOLOGY
The methodology used in this project is to find out the optimum air intake to
reduce the NOx pollutant by the computational fluid dynamics method. The Fluent
CFD code has been used to predict the NO x emissions by varying the air mass
flow rate under different load conditions.
ii.
Pre-processor
a. Geometry generation
b. Mesh generation
c. Boundary conditions
Solver
a. Solver and Discretization scheme
34
iii.
b. Turbulence model
c. Species Transport
d. NOx Model
Post processor
Select a Solver
Create the initial vertices
Create arcs for the bend of the inlet manifold
Create the straight edges
Create the faces from edges
35
Select a mesh
Select a face mesh
Select the face to mesh
Choose the triangular element
Enter the value of interval size 0.5
Click apply
Specify the boundary type
Export and save the session
36
Mean flow velocity at the inlet @zero lift, U ref= mass flow rate /(density * area)
Reynolds number Re
= Uref D/
= 0.16 (Re)-1/8
= 0.07*L
Dissipation rate,
= C 3/4 k3/2/l
= t/
=305 K
=0.23
= 305 K
=1
=0
=305 K
=0.23
= 305 K
37
s V. n dS = 0
The integration is over the surface S of the control volume and n is the
outward normal at the surface. Physically, this equation means that the net volume
flow into the control volume is zero. Consider the rectangular cell shown below
38
this simulation.
Select the energy equation.
Select the k- equations in viscous model
Specify the species used for the simulation such as fluid, solid
or mixture. In this case the model consists of a mixture.
Therefore, the species in the mixture must be defined, which
v.
is Diesel-air.
Then the properties of each species must be defined or use
39
i.
There are few options to display the results. The results can
ii.
turbulence model. In a swirling flow field with recirculation, the prediction due to
standard k - method is found to be poor in certain regions. The deficiency of
standard k - model stems from the neglect of anisotropic viscosity and the
generation of additional turbulence due to the effect of streamline curvature.
Accordingly, some advanced turbulence models can be tried out to capture the
swirling recirculation flows. The appropriate choice depends on the strength of the
swirl, which can be gauged by the Swirl number(s). For flows with weak to
moderate swirl (S < 0.5), both the RNG k - model and the realizable k - model
yield appreciable improvements over the standard k - model. For highly swirling
flows (S > 0.5), the Reynolds stress model (RSM) is strongly recommended13.
The effects of strong turbulence anisotropy can be modelled rigorously only by the
second moment closure adopted in the RSM. In this study, the standard k -
model with standard wall function treatment has been considered. Further studies
can be carried out using the aforesaid higher order turbulence models. The
following model constants are used in accordance with the standard k - model.
The turbulence model used in this project will be Standard k - model. The
model is very suitable for initial iterations, initial screening of alternative designs
and parametric studies. This model is valid for fully turbulent flows only. Since the
flow inside the engine cylinder is fully turbulent this model is one of the preferred
model for in cylinder flow analysis. The simplest complete models" of turbulence
are two equation models in which the solution of two separate transport equations
allows the turbulent velocity and length scales to be independently determined.
40
The standard k - model in fluent package falls within this class of turbulence
model.
6.6 SPECIES TRANSPORT
The species transport with the chemical reaction has been modelled using
the Generalized Finite Rate Chemistry (GFRC) formulation. The finite rate
chemistry approach is based on the solution of species transport equations for
reactants and product concentrations. The reaction between the fuel vapour and
oxidizer is considered to be a single step, irreversible, global reaction as
2C10H22 + 31 O2
20CO2 + 22H2O
41
The diesel engine is the most efficient among all known types of internal
combustion engine. All over the world, heavy trucks, urban buses, and industrial
equipment are powered almost exclusively by diesel engines. In Europe, dieselpowered cars have become increasingly popular. Owing to the lack of throttling
losses and also to the higher compression ratio, diesel engines have low brake
specific fuel consumption (BSFC) and thus low carbon dioxide (CO 2) emissions.
Furthermore, because of its ability to operate at low equivalence ratios, the diesel
engine produces low carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrocarbon (HC) emissions.
Unfortunately, the diesel engine suffers from relatively high nitrogen oxides (NO x)
and particulate matter (PM) emissions. By the custom field function NO parts can
be compute in terms of parts per million (ppm).
NOx will be computed from the following equation
42
CHAPTER-7
RESULT AND DISCUSSSION
43
14.5
15
2230.361
2238.32
42.08464
37.92718
Fig 7.1 Air velocity vs Temperature for fuel mass flow rate of 6.51*10 -4 kg/s
Fig 7.2 Air velocity vs NOx for fuel mass flow rate of 6.51*10-4 kg/s
From the above graph it is evitable that NO X emission at a mass flow rate of
6.51*10-4 kg/s is minimum of air velocity of 5 m/s.
44
Fig 7.3 Contours of static temperature of fuel mass flow rate of 6.51*10 -4 kg/s at air
velocity of 5m/s
Fig 7.4 Contours of NO-PPM of fuel mass flow rate of 6.51*10 -4 kg/s at air velocity
of 5m/s
Table 7.2 Results for Mass Flow Rate of 9.22*10 -4 kg/s
Air Velocity (m/s)
0.5
Temperature (k)
2434.969
NOx (ppm)
261.622
45
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
9.5
10
10.5
11
11.5
12
12.5
13
13.5
14
14.5
15
2451.69
2450.758
2424.001
2377.183
2291.388
2217.579
2222.621
2230.046
2230.643
2222.103
2210.493
2207.5
2217.686
2242.363
2290.259
2334.299
2352.231
2363.511
2347.116
2362.041
2371.12
2377.397
2376.875
2367.145
2367.932
2385.076
2380.479
2362.617
2377.099
161.0053
123.5608
99.72151
75.07653
49.46581
32.99378
28.35014
24.22012
20.0224
16.5068
13.49605
11.46855
10.60098
10.41714
11.24126
12.18747
13.0054
13.01384
13.09187
13.62889
13.75172
15.54419
16.73866
21.96215
28.82411
33.64527
38.72235
44.14764
48.17042
Fig 7.5 Air velocity vs temperature for fuel mass flow rate of 9.22*10 -4 kg/s
46
Fig 7.6 Air velocity vs NOx for fuel mass flow rate of 9.22*10-4 kg/s
From the above graph it is evitable tat NO X emission at a mass flow rate of
9.22*10-4 kg/s is minimum for air velocity of 7.5 m/s.
Fig 7.7 Contours of static temperature of fuel mass flow rate of 9.22*10 -4 kg/s at air
velocity of 7.5m/s
47
Fig 7.8 Contours of NO-PPM of fuel mass flow rate of 9.22*10 -4 kg/s at air velocity
of 7.5m/s
48
10.5
11
11.5
12
12.5
13
13.5
14
14.5
15
2385.001
2372.077
2370.175
2384.733
2390.005
2382.943
2393.257
2377.918
2382.682
2395.902
12.50008
12.5265
12.58298
13.34304
14.42386
15.13381
16.04062
21.45944
29.09981
34.90672
Fig 7.9 Air velocity vs temperature for fuel mass flow rate of 1.04*10 -3 kg/s
Fig 7.10 Air velocity vs NOx for fuel mass flow rate of 1.04*10-3 kg/s\
49
From the above graph it is evitable tat NO X emission at a mass flow rate of
1.04*10-3 kg/s is minimum for air velocity of 8 m/s.
Fig 7.11 Contours of static temperature of fuel mass flow rate of 1.04*10 -3 kg/s at
air velocity of 8m/s
50
Fig 7.12 Contours of NO-PPM of fuel mass flow rate of 1.04*10 -3 kg/s at air
velocity of 8m/s
51
Fig 7.13 Air velocity vs temperature for fuel mass flow rate of 1.19*10 -3 kg/s
Fig 7.14 Air velocity vs NOx for fuel mass flow rate of 1.19*10-3 kg/s
From the above graph it is evitable tat NO X emission at a mass flow rate of
1.19*10-3 kg/s is minimum for air velocity of 9.5 m/s.
52
Fig 7.15 Contours of static temperature of fuel mass flow rate of 1.19*10 -3 kg/s at
air velocity of 9.5m/s
Fig 7.16 Contours of NO-PPM of fuel mass flow rate of 1.19*10 -3 kg/s at air
velocity of 9.5m/s
53
54
Fig 7.17 Air velocity vs Temperature for fuel mass flow rate of 1.28*10 -3 kg/s
Fig 7.18 Air velocity vs NOx for fuel mass flow rate of 1.28*10-3 kg/s
From the above graph it is evitable tat NO X emission at a mass flow rate of
1.28*10-3 kg/s is minimum for air velocity of 10 m/s.
Fig 7.19 Contours of static temperature of fuel mass flow rate of 1.28*10 -3 kg/s at
air velocity of 10m/s
55
Fig 7.20 Contours of NO-PPM of fuel mass flow rate of 1.28*10 -3 kg/s at air
velocity of 10m/s
56
CHAPTER-8
CONCLUSION
The engine needs variable flow rate to enhance the combustion in the
cylinder according to its operating condition. Optimum flow rate is necessary
according to the engine operating condition for optimum combustion and emission
reduction. So an experimental set up is been chosen and corresponding fuel
consumption for various electrical loading conditions are found. These values are
taken as input for CFD analysis. For each fuel consumption value corresponding
air flow rate values are tabulated and from that air flow rate which produces
minimum NOx is found. These values are tabulated below.
Table 8.1 Optimized Results
Electrical
loading(kw)
0
1.5
3
4.5
6
Fuel
consumption
(kg/s)
6.51*10-4
9.22*10-4
1.04*10-3
1.19*10-3
1.28*10-3
Air
velocity(m/s)
5
7.5
8
9.5
10
Temperature(k)
NOx(ppm)
2152.927
2242.363
2242.179
2282.749
2288.521
10.12925
10.41714
10.31696
10.10894
9.952856
The CFD results provided clearly shows that the nitrous oxide is reduced
drastically by apply varying air flow rate according to its condition. Thus the
minimum NOx emission values are found for variable fuel consumption and air flow
rate.
REFERENCES
57
58
13)