Jesus Ramos, A091 679 605 (BIA July 19, 2016)
Jesus Ramos, A091 679 605 (BIA July 19, 2016)
Jesus Ramos, A091 679 605 (BIA July 19, 2016)
Department of Justice
A 091-679-605
Date of this notice: 7/19/2016
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case.
Sincerely,
bonrtL
{!t1/IA)
Donna Carr
Chief Clerk
Enclosure
Panel Members:
Guendelsberger, John
Userteam: Docket
Date:
JUL 1 9 2016
MOTION
ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Mario Acosta, Jr., Esquire
ON BEHALF OF DHS: John D. Holliday
Assistant Chief Counsel
APPLICATION: Reopening; termination
This matter was last before the Board on June 9, 2015, when we dismissed the respondent's
appeal from the Immigration Judge's denial of his motion to reopen and terminate proceedings.
The respondent now files a second motion to reopen and terminate proceedings, requesting that
we reopen sua sponte in light of a February 8, 2016, order from the Superior Court of the State of
California, County of Los Angeles, granting the respondent's motion to vacate the conviction
that served as the basis for his sole charge of removability (Motion to Reopen, Tab A; Exh. I).
The motion, which is opposed by the Department of Homeland Security, will be granted and the
respondent's removal proceedings will be terminated.
The Superior Court's order explains that the respondent's guilty plea was made in violation
of his statutory rights pursuant to section IO16.5 of the California Penal Code, which requires
that prior to acceptance of a guilty plea courts must advise defendants of the resulting possible
immigration consequences (Motion to Reopen, Tab A). The order states that the judgment of
conviction was vacated, the plea of guilty to sale/transportation of a controlled substance in
violation of section 1 l 352(a) of the California Health and Safety Code was withdrawn, and the
case was ordered dismissed (/d.).
Inasmuch as the conviction underlying the respondent's sole basis for removability has been
vacated due to a defect in the underlying proceeding, we will grant the respondent's motion sua
sponte and terminate the proceedings. See Matter of Adamiak, 23 l&N Dec. 878 (BIA 2006);
Matter of J-J-, 21 l&N Dec. 976 (BIA 1997) (discussing the Board's limited authority to reopen
or reconsider cases sua sponte in exceptional circumstances).
Accordingly, the following orders will be entered.
Cite as: Jesus Ramos, A091 679 605 (BIA July 19, 2016)
IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
A091 679605
ORDER: The motion to reopen is granted.
FURTHER ORDER: The removal proceedings are terminated without prejudice. 1
We have been advised that a petition for review of the DHS's reinstatement of the now
terminated removal order is pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit (Case No. 13-71338, filed April 16, 2013) (Motion to Reopen, Tab A). The parties
should notify the Ninth Circuit of our instant decision .
.2 .
Cite as: Jesus Ramos, A091 679 605 (BIA July 19, 2016)