Gravity Dam Design Example
Gravity Dam Design Example
Gravity Dam Design Example
GRAVITY DAMS
Example 16.1 For the profile of a gravity dam shown in Fig. 16.8, compute principal
stresses for usual loading and vertical stresses for extreme loading at the heel and toe of the
base of the dam. Also determine factors of safety against overturning and sliding as well as
shear-friction factors of safety for usual loading and extreme loading (with drains inoperative)
conditions. Consider only downward earthquake acceleration for extreme loading condition.
Sediment is deposited to a height of 15 m in the reservoir. Other data are as follows:
Coefficient of shear friction, = 0.7 (usual loading)
= 0.85 (extreme loading)
Shear strength at concrete-rock contact, C = 150 104 N/m2
= 2.4 104 N/m3
0.75
1
h = 96
Ww
0.15
30 1
0.3
Gallery
4.5
h = g
8
63.75
76.25
(a) Profile
4.8
g
38
Drains
inoperative
96
Drains operative
Fig. 16.8 Profile and uplift pressure diagram for the gravity dam of Example 16.1
550
= 1 104 N/m3
h = 0.1; v = 0.05
Solution:
Computation of Stresses:
(i) Usual loading combination (normal design reservoir elevation with appropriate dead
loads, uplift (with drains operative), silt, ice, tail-water, and thermal loads corresponding to usual temperature):
Resultant vertical force = W = sum of vertical forces at sl. nos. 1, 2 (i), 3 (i), and 4(ii)
of Table 16.1.
= (8584.50 + 394.88 2000.68 + 32.48) 104
= 7011.18 104 N
Resultant horizontal force = H = sum of horizontal forces at sl. nos. 2 (ii) and 4 (i) of
Table 16.1.
= ( 4567.50 153.00) 104
= 4720.50 104 N
Moment about toe of the dam at the base = M = sum of moments at sl. nos. 1,2, 3 (i),
and 4 of Table 16.1.
= [418302.75 + 27091.99 147334.50 96183.57 + 1662.88] 104
= 203539.55 104 Nm
Distance of the resultant from the toe, y =
M 203539.55 10 4
=
= 29.03 m
W
. 104
701118
. 10 4
.
W
6 910
6e
701118
=
1+
1+
b
b
76.25
76.25
LM
N
OP
Q
LM
N
OP
Q
6 9.10
6e
7011.18 10 4
W
=
1
1
76.25
76.25
b
b
= 26.11 104 N/m2
yU =
LM
N
OP
Q
LM
N
Using Eq. (16.21), shear stress at the toe, (yx)D = (yD p) tan D
OP
Q
Dead load Wc
Water load
Vertical
Head-water Ww
Tail-water Ww
Horizontal
Head-water Wl
Tail-water Wl
Uplift force, U
Drains
operative
Drains
inoperative
2.
(i)
(a)
(b)
(ii)
(a)
(b)
3.
(i)
(ii)
1 0.5 87 76.25 1
1 9 76.25 1
1 38 4.8 1
1 58 4.8 0.5 1
1 29 71.45 0.5 1
1 9 71.45 1
1 0.5 96 96 1.0
1 0.5 9 9 1.0
1 66 4.5 1.0
1 0.5 30 4.5 1.0
1 0.5 9.0 6.75 1.0
(3)
(2)
(1)
1.
Force computations
(104 newtons)
Type of load
Sl.
No.
4003.13
3316.88
686.25
2000.68
182.40
139.20
1036.03
643.05
+ 394.88
+ 297.00
+ 67.50
+ 30.38
+ 8584.50
+ 162.00
+ 1920.00
+ 6502.50
(4)
Vertical forces
(downward + ve)
(104 newtons)
4567.50
4908.00
+ 40.50
(5)
Horizontal forces
(upstream + ve)
(104 newtons)
Magnitude of forces
50.83
38.13
73.85
74.65
47.63
35.73
32.00
3.00
73.25
67.75
42.50
(6)
Moment arm
(metres)
Table 16.1 Computation of forces and moments for unit length of dam section
13470.24
10391.28
49345.87
22976.18
(Contd.)...
194763.72
168597.01
26166.71
96183.57
147334.50
147456.00
+ 121.50
+ 27091.99
+21978.00
+5045.63
+ 68.36
+ 418302.75
+ 11866.50
+ 130080.00
+ 276356.25
(7)
Moment about
the toe (anticlockwise + ve)
(104 Nm)
GRAVITY DAMS
551
1Hydrodynamic
Tail-water1
(b)
(a)
Hydrodynamic
force
Head-water
(c1=cm for y=h)
(ii)
(i)
5.
(ii)
load
Earthquake
forces
Inertial
horizontal force
due to weight of
the dam
Load due to
sediment
deposit Ws
Excess horizontal pressure
Excess vertical
4.
(i)
(2)
(1)
491.19
2.76
488.43
50.00
28.33
10.00
15/3 = 5.00
(6)
force due to tail -water has been considered negative for the most critical condition.
858.45
192.00
650.25
1920.00 0.1
6502.50 0.1
153
(5)
16.20
32.48
(4)
162.00 0.1
1 0.5 15 15 1.36
(3)
19321.38
10.25
19311.13
28183.58
9600.00
18421.58
162.00
+ 1662.88
+ 2427.88
765.00
(7)
552
IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
553
GRAVITY DAMS
Using Eq. (16.19), with pe = 0, the minor principal stress at the heel
1U = yU sec2 U p tan2 U
= 26.11 104 1.0225 96 104 0.0225
= 24.54 104 N/m2
Using Eq (16.22), shear stress at the heel, (yx)U = (yU p) tan U
=
=
stabilising moment
overturning moment
= 1.84
H
W
4720.55 10 4
701118
. 104
= 0.67
Cb 1 + W
H
= 3.46
(ii) Extreme loading combination (usual loading combination with drains inoperative
and the loading due to earthquake):
The inertial and hydrodynamic forces and corresponding moments due to horizontal
earthquake have been computed as shown in Table 16.1. The effect of vertical earthquake can
be included in stability computations by multiplying the forces by (1 + v) and (1 v) for
upward and downward accelerations, respectively. Since the computation of hydrodynamic
force involves the use of unit weight of water, the hydrodynamic force will also be modified by
vertical acceleration due to earthquake. Further, the effect of earthquake on uplift forces is
considered negligible. For reservoir full condition, the downward earthquake acceleration
results in more critical condition. Therefore, the following computations have been worked out
for the downward earthquake acceleration only.
Resultant vertical force with downward earthquake acceleration
= (8584.50 + 394.88 + 32.48) 104 0.95 2000.68 104
= 6560.59 104 N
Resultant horizontal force with downward earthquake acceleration
= (4567.50 + 153 + 858.45 + 491.19) 104
= 6070.14 104 N
554
y=
M 44843.53 10 4
= 6.835 m
=
W
6560.59 10 4
W
6 31.29
6e
6560.59 10 4
=
1+
1+
b
b
76.25
76.25
FG
H
IJ
K
FG
H
IJ
K
6 31.29
6e
6560.59 10 4
W
=
1
1
76.25
76.25
b
b
4
2
= 125.81 10 N/m
Factor of safety against overturning
and
Sliding factor
FG
H
yU =
IJ
K
FG
H
IJ
K
H
W
=
=
Cb 1 + W
H