Effect of Boron PDF
Effect of Boron PDF
Effect of Boron PDF
boron hardenability in steels. One suggestion for boron hardenability is that free
boron diffuses to austenite grain boundaries and lowers their energy, thereby
making them less favorable sites for ferrite
nucleation. Ohmori and Yamanaka (Ref.
13) have found evidence of grain boundary enrichment with high sensitivity ion
microprobe analysis. There is also evidence that boron decreases the self diffusion coefficient of iron in austenite (Refs.
14, 15). Since nucleation rate is proportional to the iron atom jump frequency,
this could be an explanation for boron retardation of ferrite nucleation.
Austenite grain boundaries are commonly known as ferrite nucleation sites.
However, if the crystallographic nature of
the grain boundary is considered, one
finds that even in high angle boundaries,
where one would expect nucleation to be
most rapid, there are regions of relatively
high- and low-atom density (Ref. 15). If
regions of low-atom density are favored
sites for nucleation of ferrite, it is possible
that boron poisons them either through
filling up the free volume by segregating
there, or by precipitating on the boundary
as borocarbides (Refs. 16-17). Furthermore, others have observed that Fe23
(B,C)6 precipitation is a precursor to ferrite
formation (Refs. 18, 19). Borocarbides
have been reported to block ferrite nucleation only when they are small, and to
KEY WORDS
Low-Carbon Steel
Weld Metal Toughness
Boron and Titanium
Synergic B+Ti Effect
Flux Cored Arc Welds
Acicular Ferrite
100% C 0 2 Shielding
Effects on Ferrite
Effects on Bainite
Hardenability
o
o
Fig. 1 Influence of
variations in weld
metal titanium and
boron contents on
CTOD at -50C
(Ref. 26).
Mechanical Properties
YS
37.5 k g / m m 2
UTS
52.2 k g / m m 2
CVN at
-50C
36.4 kg m (longitudinal)
Table 2Welding Procedure Specification for the 25 Experimental Weld Deposits Used in
This Study
Welding Procedure Specification
Flux cored arc welding
Flat
AWS 5.20
E71T-1
C 0 2 (100%)
20 mm
DCEP (Electrode +)
<200C
Welding process
Position of welding
Filler metal specification
Filler metal classification
Shielding gas
Work-to-tip distance
Polarity
Interpass temperature
Pass
No.
1
2
3
4
Wire
Size
(mm)
Welding
Amperes
(A)
Current
Volts
(V)
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
260
260
200
260
28
28
25
28
152-s|APRIL 1990
Welding Procedure
Heat
Travel
Input
Speed
(mm/m)
(KJ/mm)
410
205
205
205
1.07
2.13
1.46
2.13
loint Detail
fv^
r
|-^53>n
Si
C
wt-%
B
ppm
Ti
ppm
O
ppm
N
ppm
Mn
wt-%
wt-%
Ni
wt-%
Nb
wt-%
0.0731
0.0846
0.0986
0.0954
0.0999
0.0906
0.0770
0.0959
0.0858
0.0936
0.0855
0.0798
0.0916
0.0945
0.0882
0.0793
0.0758
0.0876
0.0953
0.0838
0.0719
0.0730
0.0781
0.0808
0.0795
8
6
11
11
7
25
28
21
24
28
44
39
42
45
44
49
55
62
56
73
69
70
76
87
91
80
227
425
644
764
78
205
328
423
645
77
191
421
490
728
80
200
321
428
695
76
234
376
477
671
359
271
303
272
283
318
299
300
291
306
276
318
283
301
296
332
317
279
290
296
359
303
279
303
291
63
87
75
113
137
78
123
111
96
102
76
122
101
126
146
68
64
76
99
104
82
73
77
98
106
1.3648
1.4410
1.4970
1.5787
1.5312
1.4170
1.4958
1.3914
1.3879
1.4975
1.4876
1.3817
1.4883
1.4740
1.5276
1.4438
1.5241
1.4617
1.3880
1.5427
1.4545
1.5097
1.3877
1.4867
1.6400
0.4329
0.4926
0.5114
0.5985
0.5824
0.4341
0.4430
0.4510
0.4650
0.5440
0.4775
0.4045
0.5369
0.5269
0.5876
0.4761
0.4661
0.4676
0.4518
0.5850
0.4508
0.4942
0.4414
0.5188
0.6280
0.0526
0.0546
0.0632
0.0578
0.0548
0.0567
0.0548
0.0552
0.0533
0.0523
0.0573
0.0539
0.0551
0.0537
0.0557
0.0546
0.0541
0.0531
0.0539
0.0527
0.0542
0.0543
0.0555
0.0530
0.0546
0.0056
0.0053
0.0092
0.0067
0.0055
0.0066
0.0071
0.0063
0.0056
0.0050
0.0061
0.0061
0.0058
0.0056
0.0066
0.0059
0.0055
0.0054
0.0060
0.0047
0.0061
0.0054
0.0067
0.0058
0.0064
stant between 271 and 359 ppm and between 63 and 146 ppm, respectively.
These variations in the weld metal titanium
and boron contents were sufficient to
cause a wide variation in the weld metal
microstructure.
Increasing the weld metal boron content from 6 to 91 ppm at five different
levels of titanium content caused refinement of the weld metal microstructure by
increasing the acicular ferrite content and
by decreasing the primary ferrite content,
as shown in Figs. 2 and 3. Figure 2 shows
that increasing the boron content without
u_
<
UJ
cc
cc
96
UJ
92
cc
<
88
o
A
o
<
UJ
o
cc
76
I9I
32 I
423
645
- 80
-234 _
-425
-644
- 728 A
Fig. 2 Summary
plot of the variation
in acicular ferrite
content as a
function of the weld
metal boron
concentration at five
different levels of
the titanium
concentration.
ZD
a
Results and Discussion
Ti content in
weld metal (ppm)
00
84
"
n
80 -
"6
76
UJ
TO
0
BORON
20
40
60
80
I00
u.
28 -
LL
UJ
?4
cc
vr.
20
Ti content in
weld metal (ppm)
O
A
76
191
321
423
645
- 80 - 234
- 425 _
- 644
-728 _
Ixl
u_
>tr
<
2
16
3 "\
12
cc
Fig. 3Summary
plot of the variation
in primary ferrite
content as a
function of the weld
metal boron
concentration of five
different levels of
the titanium
concentration.
CL
r52
UJ
o
cc
UJ
n
vO__
4
n
I
co
1
40
20
60
80
100
rx
co
significant change in acicular ferrite content, as shown in Fig. 6. Figure 6 also indicates that the acicular ferrite content
passes through a maximum at about 450
ppm of titanium content when boron
content is less than 45 ppm, and that this
maximum ferrite content shifts to approximately 200 ppm titanium when the boron
content is larger than 50 ppm. The maximum acicular ferrite content is found at
about 42 ppm boron. Figure 7 shows that
there is a significant reduction in primary
ferrite content when more than 200 ppm
of titanium is used with a sufficient boron
content.
The effects of titanium on the side-plate
ferrite content and the upper bainite content are similar to those of boron, as
shown in Figs. 8 and 9. The side-plate ferrite content decreases with increasing
titanium, while the upper bainite content
increases. The welds containing sufficient
levels of boron and titanium show no
side-plate ferrite. Figure 9 illustrates the
elimination of upper bainite when titanium
and boron are less than 400 and 10 ppm,
respectively.
Ti content in
A
UJ
t<
m
2
76 -- 80
I9I -- 2 3 4
32I -- 4 2 5
423- - 6 4 4
645 - 7 2 8
co
Ti
IO-
content in
weld metal ( p p m )
o
A
UJ
_J
CL
8 -
76
I9I
32 I
423
645
- 80
-234
-425
-644
- 728
<
CD
UJ
Q
CC
UJ
QIX
ZD
CO
- .
UJ
r-
o
cc
-ZUJ
UJ
a.
a
0
cc
e-
20
40
60
80
LU
I00
154-s|APRIL 1990
CL
I00
BORON CONTENT IN WELD METAL(ppm)
Fig. 5 Summary plot of the variation in upper bainite content as a function of the weld metal boron concentration at five different levels of the
titanium concentration.
B conlent in
LL.
<r
UJ
h-
cc
cc
UJ
100
96
a
0
A
-ll
21 - 2 b
39 - 4 5
49 - 7 3
69 -91
9?
u.
CL.
CO
88
<
1
a
I
I
B c o n t e n t in
CO
>
o
84
RO
H
UJ
O
UJ
76
cc
UJ
Q.
UJ
r-
<
C >
<
r
6-11
21-28
39-45
49-73
69-91
CO
-70
200
400
600
800
LU
O
CC
LU
CL
200
400
600
800
ll.
a.
-
UJ
rCC
CC
UJ
U.
28
1
1
B content in
24 -
20
X~-S
k
Cc
"
_
CD
ZD
""""""cr
CO
L_
\\T\
cc
cc
0
A
1
6-11
21-28
39-45
49 - 7 3
69-91
16
<
2
12
"
LU
0
cc
UJ
1
1
B conlent in
weld metal (ppm)
0
A
6 - - 11
21 - 2 8
39 - 4 5
49 - 7 3
69 - 9 1
<
8 _
OD
r~
UJ
CC
LU
Q_
4 -
CL
200
400
600
800
3
tLU
CJ>
CC
LU
Q_
800
TITANIUM CONTENT IN WELD METAL (ppm)
Fig. 9 Summary plot of the variation in upper bainite content as a function of the weld metal titanium concentration at five different levels of
the boron concentration.
0
BORON CONTENT IN WELD METAL (ppm)
Fig. 10 Combined effects of weld metal boron and titanium on the
Rockwell B hardness of the weld metal.
Excessive amounts of boron and titanium are detrimental to the weld metal
toughness; thus, boron and titanium contents must be controlled to produce the
desired microstructure. If acicular ferrite is
considered to improve toughness and
primary ferrite to reduce toughness, the
optimum boron and titanium contents for
better toughness can be determined from
contour plots of the volume fractions of
acicular ferrite and primary ferrite as
shown in Figs. 11 and 12. The solid lines
indicate the specific volume fractions of
50
100
'
I40 -
-n
X>
__-2?
%'
30
60
- I20 -
i I00
1/
/1
o
-
-^
40
0/
m.'/
>'-"u ^
S*
'
20
-I00
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
I00
TEMPERATURE (C)
50
I00
Z
i
140
120
~^r
#r
cr 8 0
cc
60
40
to
CD
<
a.
O
" tf
'
>
UJ
x
o
tr
<
/ /
> ^
_j
UJ
--A-
rr? # * A ^
1 0 0
CO
UJ
rcc=rrr=T=rzy
^5
LlJ
/ ^
0.0028 B-0.0205 Ti
0.0021 B-0.0328 T i 00024B-0.0423Ti
0.0028 B-0.0645 Ti"
20
-80
-60
-40
-20
20
40
60
80
UJ
tn
z
UJ
100
a.
O
UJ
-100
TEMPERATURE CC)
1
D
'
I40
J'^* -~*
IPO
a
o
cr
<
UJ
tn
UJ
tr
1
~-t
>
Cl
>
cc
80
-40
I 0 0
UJ
/ "
"A _
-z.
60
O
111
cr
CO
LU
<
/
40
/ >
7. z-
!\,
20
40
60
80
I00
"S
20
0.0039 B 0.0191 Ti
0 . 0 0 4 2 B 0.0421 Ti -
0.0045 B 0.0490Ti
0 . 0 0 4 4 B 0.0728 Ti "
-80
-60
40
-20
20
40
60
80
I
20
n
20
o
IT
<
UJ
100
TEMPERATURE CC)
_J
>
-100
o.
o
UJ
0 . 0 0 4 4 B -0.0077 Ti -
a, //*
C z
-20
TEMPERATURE C O
tr
UJ
40
Ddp
60
a.
O
_i
UJ
>
UJ
I
a
o
a:
<
UJ
UPPER
BAINITE PERCENT
F,g 18 - Influence ol the weld metal upper bainite content on the 50",
FATT.
tn
H
Z
LL
2
a
C
- i
Ui
-40
-20
>
20
z
o
tr
TEMPERATURE CC)
Fig. Ib - Influence of variation in weld metal titanium content on weld
metal notch toughness at 49-73 ppm of boron.
UJ
tn
Ui
tr
t h e increase in hardenability is e n o u g h to
p r o m o t e the f o r m a t i o n of ferrite w i t h an
aligned s e c o n d phase (mostly u p p e r bainite). In o r d e r t o maximize hardenability in
w r o u g h t steel, w h i c h is usually austenitized f o r an h o u r or m o r e , the o p t i m u m
c o n c e n t r a t i o n of b o r o n is said t o b e
b e t w e e n 3 a n d 3 0 p p m . B o r o n additions
a b o v e this value decrease hardenability
b y the f o r m a t i o n of b o r o c a r b i d e s , M 2 3
(B,C)6, w h i c h act as the preferential nucleation sites for the austenite t o ferrite
t r a n s f o r m a t i o n at prior austenite grain
boundaries. C o n t r o l l e d additions of b o t h
b o r o n a n d titanium are essential t o achieve
higher v o l u m e fractions of acicular ferrite.
T h e o p t i m u m b o r o n and titanium c o n tents d e p e n d o n the various factors such
as the levels o f o t h e r alloy additions and
the welding procedures.
Conclusions
1) T h e influence of b o r o n o n increasing
acicular ferrite in w e l d metal microstructures w a s v e r y small w i t h o u t a sufficient
titanium a d d i t i o n . T h e influence of titanium w a s also v e r y small w i t h o u t sufficient
levels of b o r o n .
2) A large v o l u m e f r a c t i o n of acicular
ferrite ( u p t o 95%) can b e o b t a i n e d b y
maintaining b o r o n and titanium c o n t e n t s
b e t w e e n 4 0 - 4 5 p p m and b e t w e e n 4 0 0 500 p p m , respectively. This is based o n a
2.23 k j / m m (57 k j / i n . ) heat input o n
2 5 - m m - t h i c k m i c r o a l l o y e d steel plate.
3) T h e decrease in l o w - t e m p e r a t u r e
toughness w i t h excess b o r o n a n d titanium
c o n t e n t s can b e explained b y an increased
v o l u m e c o n t e n t of u p p e r bainite.
A ckno wledgments
T h e authors a c k n o w l e d g e a n d a p p r e c i ate the s u p p o r t of the U n i t e d States A r m y
Research O f f i c e , Hyundai H e a v y Industries, H o b a r t Brothers C o m p a n y and the
Lukens Steel C o r p o r a t i o n .
References
1. Pickering, F. B. 1977. Low-carbon highstrength structural steels a status report.
Metall. Mater. Techn., 9:375-279.
2. Koukabi, A. H., North. T. H . and Bell,
H. B., 1975. Properties of submerged arc weld
deposits effects of Zr, V and Ti/B. Metal
Const, and British W. J 11:639.
3. Watanabe, I., and Kojima, T. 1980. Effects
of titanium, boron and oxygen on notch toughness. /. Jpn. Weld. Soc. 49:772.
4. Mori, N., Homma, H., Ohkita, S., and
Asano, K. 1980. The behavior of B and N in
notch toughness improvement of Ti-B bearing
weld metals. IIW Doc. IX-1158-80, American
Council, American Welding Society, Miami, Fla.
5. Mori, N., Homma. H., Ohkita, S., and
Wakabayashi, M. 1981. Mechanisms of notch
toughness improvement in Ti-B bearing weld
metals. IIW Doc. lX-1196-81k, American Council, American Welding Society, Miami, Fla.
6. Mori, N., Homma, H., Wakabayaski, M.,
and Ohkita, S. Characteristics of mechanical
properties of Ti-B, bearing weld metals. IIW
Doc. 11-980-82, IX-1229-82, American Council,
American Welding Society, Miami. Fla.
7. Davis, M. L. E., Pargeter, R. )., and Bailey
N. 1983. Effects of titanium and boron additions
to submerged arc welding fluxes. Metal Const.
15:338-344.
8. Brownlee, ). K. 1985. Effects of aluminum
and titanium on the microstructure and properties of microalloyed steel weld metals. M.S.
Thesis TR-3064, Colorado School of Mines,
Golden, Colo.
9. Fleck, N. 1984. The effect of filler wire and
flux compositions on the microstructure and
properties of microalloyed steel weld metals.
M.S. Thesis T-2942, Colorado School of Mines,
Golden, Colo.
10. Watanabe, I., and Kojima, T. 1981. Role
of titanium and boron with respect to refinement of microstructure. / jpn. Weld. Soc.
50:702.
11. Kohno, R., Takami, T Mori, N and Nagano, K. 1982. New flux of improved weld
metal toughness for HSLA steels. Welding Journal^ (12):373-s to 380-s.
12. Suzuki, H., Sekino, S., Mori, N., Homma,
H., Tanigaki, H., and Sugilka, I. 1972. Development of CaF2-Ti-B-type submerged arc tubular
wire with high notch toug'-ness. IIW Doc.
11-583-71, XI-750-72, America.-. Council, American Welding Society, Miami, Fla.
13. Ohmori and Yamanaka. 1979. Proc. Int.
Symp. on Boron in Steel. Milwaukee, Wis. pp.
44-60.
14. Levitin, V. V. 1960. Phys. Metals and
Metallography. 10:130.
15. Borisov, V. T., etal. 1964. Phys. Metals
and Metallography 17:80.
16. Sharma, R. C , and Purdy, G R. 1973.
Nucleation limitation and hardenability. Met.
Trans 4:2303.
17. Maitrepierre, Ph., Thivellier, D., and Tricot, R. 1975. Influence of boron on the decomposition of austenite in low-carbon alloyed
steels. Met. Trans. 6A:287.
18. Ueno, M and Inoue, T. 1973. Distribution of boron at austenite grain boundaries and
bainitic transformation in low carbon steels.
Trans ISI lapan 13:210.
19. Ohmori, Y. 1971. The isothermal decomposition of an Fe-C-B austenite. Trans. ISI
japan 11:339.
20. Maitrepierre, Ph., Thivellier, D., RofesVernis, )., Rousseau, D., and Tricot, R. 1978.
Hardenability Concepts with Applications to
Steel, AIME, Warrendale, Pa., p. 421.
21. Fehervari, A., and Tittinger, ). 1972.
Comments on IIW Doc. XII-B-109-72, American
Council, American Welding Society, Miami, Fla.
22. Rittinger, ]., and Fehervari, A. 1977. The
influence of microalloying elements on the
toughness of steels in welded microstructure.
Microalloying 75, New York, Union Carbide
Corp., pp. 592-598.
23. Bonnet, C , and Charpentier, F. P. 1983.
Proc. Int. Conf. on Effect of Residual, Impurity
and Microalloying Elements on Weldability and
Weld Properties. London, The Welding Institute, Abington. U.K., Paper 8.
24. Snyder. ). P., and Pense, A. W. 1982. Effects of Ti on submerged arc weld metal.
Welding journal 62 (7):201-s to 211-s.
25. Thaulow, C. 1980. Proc Int. Conf on
Weld Pool Chemistry and Metallurgy. London,
The Welding Institute, Abington, U.K., Paper
29.
26. Nippon Steel Corporation. 1982. Patent
No. GB 2015037B.
27. Ohkita, S., Homma, H., Tsushima, S., and
Mori, N. 1986. The effect of oxide inclusion on
the microstructure of Ti-B containing weld
metal. IIW Doc. 11-1070-86, American Council,
American Welding Society, Miami, Fla.
28. Pargeter, R. )., and Dolby, R. E. 1985.
Guidelines for classification of ferritic steel weld
metal microstructural constituents, using the
light microscope. IIW Doc. IX-1377-85, American Council, American Welding Society, Miami,
Fla.
158-s | APRIL 1 9 9 0