TSG S1 (99) 8: TSG-SA Working Group 1 (Services) Meeting #4 Bernried, Starnberger, Germany 27 Sept - 1 Oct 1999

TSG S1 (99)868
TSG-SA Working Group 1 (Services) meeting #4

Bernried, Starnberger, Germany 27th Sept 1st Oct 1999
Please see embedded help file at the bottom of this

page for instructions on how to fill in this form correctly.
CHANGE REQUEST No :
Technical Specification / Report UMTS
Submitted to
TSG_SA
TSG-SA#6
list TSG plenary meeting no. here
22.129
for approval
Agenda Item: 6.3.6
Version:
3.0.0
without presentation ("non-strategic")
for information
with presentation ("strategic")
PT SMG CR cover form is available from: http://docbox.etsi.org/tech-org/smg/Document/smg/tools/CR_form/crf28_1.zip
Proposed change
affects:
USIM
TE
Network
(at least one should be marked with an X)
Work item:
GSM UMTS Handover
Source:
S1
Subject:
Performance requirements for real time services and requirements for handover between
UMTS and GPRS
Category:
F
A
B
C
D
(one category
and one release
Only shall be
Date:
Correction
Corresponds to a correction in an earlier release
Addition of feature
Functional modification of feature
Editorial modification
Release:
X
25.10.99
Phase 2
Release 96
Release 97
Release 98
UMTS 99
Marked with an X)
Reason for
change:
Addressing performance requirements for UMTS to UMTS handover of real time services.
-
The temporal discontinuity experienced by real time services should be shorter than the same
event in GSM.
Addressing requirements for handover between UMTS and GPRS.

-
Handover to GPRS R97 core network shall be implemented.
Handover of real time PS services to GPRS R99 is out of the scope of UMTS R99 phase 1
and shall be considered in subsequent phases. (GPRS cant handle QoS requirements other
than best effort)
Clauses affected:
Other specs
Affected:
4 ; 4.3 (new) ; 4.3.1 (new) ; 6.2.4
Other releases of same spec

Other core specifications
MS test specifications / TBRs
BSS test specifications
O&M specifications
List of
List of
List of
List of
List of
CRs:
CRs:
CRs:
CRs:
CRs:
Other
comments:
help.doc
<--------- double-click here for help and instructions on how to create a CR.
GSM aa.bb Version x.y.z (YYYY-MM)
General Principles governing handover

requirements
This section describes the general principles governing the operation of UMTS when preparing for and executing
handover both within UMTS and to another radio system such as GSM. It also describes the additional concepts
required to be included in GSM to allow preparation for and handover to UMTS. As a principle, the requirements on
handover characteristics should be according to the network to which the handover is made.
The handover matrix
handover possible?
From
From
From
From
UMTS
GSM-cs
GSM-GPRS
IMT2000 UMTS
to UMTS
to GSM-cs
to GSM-GPRS
1
1
1
X
1
Oos
Oos
Oos
1
oos
oos
oos
to IMT2000
UMTS
X
Oos
Oos
Oos
oos = out of scope of UMTS specifications

1= supporting standards required for UMTS release 99.
x= supporting standards required, not necessarily for release 99.
GSM-GPRS in the table refers to R97, R98 and R99 GPRS.
For UMTS release 99 means shall be defined which:
1) enable handover to a GSM network from a UMTS network;sfdfsfsefe
2) enable handover to a UMTS network from a GSM network.
In both the cases above the GSM network may be operated by either the same network operator as the UMTS network
or a different network operator.
Handover of real time PS services between UMTS and GPRS R99 is out of the scope of UMTS R99 phase 1 and shall
be considered in subsequent phases. Service continuity of best effort packet services between UMTS and GPRS is
required.
4.1 Requirements for Service Capabilities

UMTS standardises service capabilities, not services. As part of the service capabilities it is envisaged that
applications may wish to respond to events related to handover that either has occurred, is about to occur or could
potentially occur. The service capabilities described in this section should be available at least to UE hosted
applications.
The following list is of uses is exemplary and is not intended to be exhaustive:
-
an application may wish to accept or reject offered QoS;
an application may wish to cope to the effect that handover has on a service, for example facsimile
retransmission;
an application may with to preferentially choose radio resources, for purposes such as SoLSA.
It is therefore required that the service capability set available to an application be able to provide an indication that
handover has occurred or could occur with information about the type of handover and radio resources involved. The
service capabilities should support QoS negotiation.
4.1.1 Support of localised service area (SoLSA)

The UMTS service capability set shall support the Localised Service Area (LSA) concept. It shall facilitate the
creation of applications that implement user-dependent radio resource selection based on LSA (e.g. when user is
located at his office, radio coverage provided with indoor radio solutions should be preferred). This may cause
handover to be take place within UMTS or into other radio systems. Corresponding GSM feature has been specified
in GSM 02.43.
4.2 General Operational Considerations

4.2.1 Coverage environment
Mechanisms defined to support handover between UMTS and other radio systems (such as other UMTS modes, other
IMT 2000 family members, or GSM) should effectively cope with a number of coverage scenarios:
-
limited UMTS coverage in a 'sea' of coverage provided by another radio system , or vice-versa;
selective operation at a geographical boundary, with extensive UMTS coverage on one side and extensive
coverage from another radio system on the other side;
geographically co-located areas of UMTS coverage and another radio system.
However the standards should impose no restrictions or assumptions on how an operator might deploy or operate the
network in both GSM and UMTS.
4.2.2 Inter Operator Handover Issues

Handovers between GSM and UMTS networks operated by different operators should remain an optional feature to
implement. It is envisaged that handover would take place due to changing radio conditions caused eg by movement
of the terminal causing it toleave the coverage area of a network.
The following networks may be involved with an inter-network handover procedure. These concepts are illustrated in
Annex A:
-
the users home network, i.e. the operator where the users subscription may be found;
the users visited network where the subscriber user is currently registered, i.e. the network where the
subscriber user has performed the last successful update location procedure. As long as the subscriber user is
roaming roams within the home network, home and visited network are identical.
the user's serving network covering the cell that serves the subscriber. After successful completion of the
update location update procedure, the serving network is identical with the visited network. After an internetwork handover, the visited network is different from the serving network until a location update procedure
has been successfully completed (excepted the case that the subscriber returns into the visited network).
the target network covering candidate target cell(s) for inter-network handover. The target network has
overlapping radio coverage with the serving network but not necessarily with the visited network.
The minimum requirements for inter network HO are:

-
continuity of an active call across the handover procedure, where this would be possible for intra-operator
handover;
charging, billing and accounting for inter-network handover should be according to the principles defined in
UMTS 22.15. For R'99 the mechanisms currently used in GSM should be provided as a minimum (charging
for handover leg is based on vistited network tariff, etc., settlement between operators is based on bulk
metering, etc.);
the ability to check with the home network whether the user is permitted to handover from the visited network
to a target network;
the decision whether the handover request is accepted must be taken by the target network;
invocation of the handover procedure only occurs if the target network provides the radio channel type
required for the respective call;
the avoidance of "network hopping", i.e. successive handover procedures between neighbouring networks for
the same call;
the possibility of user notification of inter network HO (eg possible tariff change) when it occurs.
4.2.3 Charging and Network Management

Means shall be standardised which allow charging records to record the time of handover in the case of inter network
operator handover. Charging records must be able to reflect the level of service , operation mode (eg. FDD or TDD)
and network type afterhandover.
A capability to provide network management information relating to frequency of occurrence and type of handover
should be defined.
4.2.4 Cost and efficiency

The UTRAN standards shall facilitate the cost effective implementation both on the network and on the terminal side,
of multi mode operation between GSM and UMTS. Impacts on the GSM network shall be minimised. Such handover
shall not require user intervention.
4.2.5 Security
Security requirements relating to handover shall be elaborated in a separate document (UMTS 33.21, security
requirements), but should embody the principle that handover shall not compromise the security of: the network
providing the new radio resources; the (possibly different) network providing the original radio resources; and the
terminalUE. The security mechanisms should also cater for appropriate authentication processes and meet the
requirements of national administrations in terms of lawful interception.
4.3 Performance Requirements

4.3.1 Temporary degradation of service caused by handover
Any degradation of service during intra UMTS handover or in the case of handover from UMTS to GSM, shall be no
worse than during intra GSM handover.
The duration of the discontinuity experienced by PS and CS real time services should be shorter than that in the
handover of GSM CS speech calls.
Requirements for Handover from UMTS to UMTS
5.1 Handover due to UE Movement

It should be possible to provide a technical implementation of handover such that there is no measurable impact on
the quality of any service when handover due to UE movement occurs. This does not imply that all UMTS handovers
will achieve this ideal. However, the standards shall define at least one UTRA mode in which this is possible given
the following:
-
UE speed stays within limits for given service;
UE stays constantly within UMTS coverage of a single UTRAN.
5.2 Handover Between UMTS Modes

The standards shall permit a technical implementation in which service is continued, although there may be a
temporary degradation which may affect teleservices at the time of handover.
5.3 Handover Between Environments

UMTS is expected to provide coverage in a number of environments including fixed and mobile. The standard shall
enable handover between these environments as described in the table below. The following are indicative of long
term requirements and do not necessarily apply to R99. However, technical standardisation should not preclude the
possiblity of implementing these requirements.
5
To
From
Terrestrial Cellular
Fixed/Cordless
Satellite
Terrestrial Cellular
Fixed/Cordless
Satellite
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
5.4 UMTS cell capacity

Consideration must be given services such as multimedia which may involve use of multiple bearers. Due for example
to cell loading, it may happen that a target cell cannot support the combination of bearer services provided by the
current serving cell. Means shall be provided for the application(s) to indicate minimum acceptable QoS for services
continuation after handover. Although all UMTS bearer services may not be handed over, the handover to another
UMTS cell should not be precluded.
Requirements for Handover from UMTS to GSM
6.1 Operational Requirements

6.1.2 GSM bands
The standard shall support handover to any combination of GSM bands supported by the GSM standards.
6.2 Performance Requirements

The following service principles apply to performance requirements:
-
when the UE performs handover to GSM then the service requirements of GSM that relate to handover
between different cells in different location areas is taken as the benchmark. It is not the intention to setmore
stringent service requirements for UMTS to GSM handover than are already commonly accepted for handover
within GSM.
6.2.1 Detection Time of Potential GSM Handover Candidates

Means shall be defined which allow the UE to achieve as good detection time performance as the GSM benchmark:
ie to behave in such a way as to detect potential GSM handover candidates as quickly as a GSM mobile performing an
intra GSM handover is required to do so.
6.2.2 Number of GSM handover candidates to detect

Means shall be available which allow UE to detect an equal number of GSM handover candidates relative to the GSM
benchmark, ie to behave in such a way as to detect as many potential GSM handover candidates as a GSM mobile
performing an intra GSM handover is required to do so.
6.2.3 Probability of Connection Loss

The service requirement is that it should be possible to hand over to GSM from UMTS with a probability of
connection loss that fulfils the corresponding service requirement for intra GSM handover.
6.2.4 Temporary degradation of service caused by handover

The service requirement is that means should be defined so that it is possible to construct networks comprising GSM
and UTRA radio resources in such a way that the duration and extent of any degradation of service during handover
from UMTS to GSM is no worse than during intra GSM handover.

TSG S1 (99) 8: TSG-SA Working Group 1 (Services) Meeting #4 Bernried, Starnberger, Germany 27 Sept - 1 Oct 1999

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TSG S1 (99) 8: TSG-SA Working Group 1 (Services) Meeting #4 Bernried, Starnberger, Germany 27 Sept - 1 Oct 1999

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

TSG S1 (99) 8: TSG-SA Working Group 1 (Services) Meeting #4 Bernried, Starnberger, Germany 27 Sept - 1 Oct 1999

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TSG S1 (99)868

TSG-SA Working Group 1 (Services) meeting #4

Please see embedded help file at the bottom of this

list TSG plenary meeting no. here

Agenda Item: 6.3.6

without presentation ("non-strategic")

with presentation ("strategic")

PT SMG CR cover form is available from: http://docbox.etsi.org/tech-org/smg/Document/smg/tools/CR_form/crf28_1.zip

(at least one should be marked with an X)

GSM UMTS Handover

Addressing requirements for handover between UMTS and GPRS.

Handover to GPRS R97 core network shall be implemented.

4 ; 4.3 (new) ; 4.3.1 (new) ; 6.2.4

Other releases of same spec

GSM aa.bb Version x.y.z (YYYY-MM)

General Principles governing handover

oos = out of scope of UMTS specifications

4.1 Requirements for Service Capabilities

an application may wish to accept or reject offered QoS;

4.1.1 Support of localised service area (SoLSA)

GSM aa.bb Version x.y.z (YYYY-MM)

4.2 General Operational Considerations

geographically co-located areas of UMTS coverage and another radio system.

4.2.2 Inter Operator Handover Issues

The minimum requirements for inter network HO are:

GSM aa.bb Version x.y.z (YYYY-MM)

4.2.3 Charging and Network Management

4.2.4 Cost and efficiency

4.3 Performance Requirements

Requirements for Handover from UMTS to UMTS

5.1 Handover due to UE Movement

UE speed stays within limits for given service;

UE stays constantly within UMTS coverage of a single UTRAN.

5.2 Handover Between UMTS Modes

5.3 Handover Between Environments

GSM aa.bb Version x.y.z (YYYY-MM)

5.4 UMTS cell capacity

Requirements for Handover from UMTS to GSM

6.1 Operational Requirements

6.2 Performance Requirements

6.2.1 Detection Time of Potential GSM Handover Candidates

6.2.2 Number of GSM handover candidates to detect

6.2.3 Probability of Connection Loss

6.2.4 Temporary degradation of service caused by handover

You might also like