TSG S1 (99) 8: Ggrgrsfdfdfgjhjhddsdsdsdsdsdsdsdsds
TSG S1 (99) 8: Ggrgrsfdfdfgjhjhddsdsdsdsdsdsdsdsds
TSG S1 (99) 8: Ggrgrsfdfdfgjhjhddsdsdsdsdsdsdsdsds
CHANGE REQUEST No :
Technical Specification / Report UMTS
Submitted to
TSG_SA
TSG-SA#6
22.129
for approval
Version:
3.0.0
for information
Proposed change
affects:
USIM
TE
Network
Work item:
Source:
S1
Subject:
Performance requirements for real time services and requirements for handover between
UMTS and GPRS
Category:
F
A
B
C
D
(one category
and one release
Only shall be
Date:
Correction
Corresponds to a correction in an earlier release
Addition of feature
Functional modification of feature
Editorial modification
Release:
X
25.10.99
Phase 2
Release 96
Release 97
Release 98
UMTS 99
Marked with an X)
Reason for
change:
Addressing performance requirements for UMTS to UMTS handover of real time services.
-
The temporal discontinuity experienced by real time services should be shorter than the same
event in GSM.
Handover of real time PS services to GPRS R99 is out of the scope of UMTS R99 phase 1
and shall be considered in subsequent phases. (GPRS cant handle QoS requirements other
than best effort)
Clauses affected:
Other specs
Affected:
List of
List of
List of
List of
List of
CRs:
CRs:
CRs:
CRs:
CRs:
Other
comments:
help.doc
<--------- double-click here for help and instructions on how to create a CR.
This section describes the general principles governing the operation of UMTS when preparing for and executing
handover both within UMTS and to another radio system such as GSM. It also describes the additional concepts
required to be included in GSM to allow preparation for and handover to UMTS. As a principle, the requirements on
handover characteristics should be according to the network to which the handover is made.
The handover matrix
handover possible?
From
From
From
From
UMTS
GSM-cs
GSM-GPRS
IMT2000 UMTS
to UMTS
to GSM-cs
to GSM-GPRS
1
1
1
X
1
Oos
Oos
Oos
1
oos
oos
oos
to IMT2000
UMTS
X
Oos
Oos
Oos
an application may wish to cope to the effect that handover has on a service, for example facsimile
retransmission;
an application may with to preferentially choose radio resources, for purposes such as SoLSA.
It is therefore required that the service capability set available to an application be able to provide an indication that
handover has occurred or could occur with information about the type of handover and radio resources involved. The
service capabilities should support QoS negotiation.
handover to be take place within UMTS or into other radio systems. Corresponding GSM feature has been specified
in GSM 02.43.
limited UMTS coverage in a 'sea' of coverage provided by another radio system , or vice-versa;
selective operation at a geographical boundary, with extensive UMTS coverage on one side and extensive
coverage from another radio system on the other side;
However the standards should impose no restrictions or assumptions on how an operator might deploy or operate the
network in both GSM and UMTS.
the users home network, i.e. the operator where the users subscription may be found;
the users visited network where the subscriber user is currently registered, i.e. the network where the
subscriber user has performed the last successful update location procedure. As long as the subscriber user is
roaming roams within the home network, home and visited network are identical.
the user's serving network covering the cell that serves the subscriber. After successful completion of the
update location update procedure, the serving network is identical with the visited network. After an internetwork handover, the visited network is different from the serving network until a location update procedure
has been successfully completed (excepted the case that the subscriber returns into the visited network).
the target network covering candidate target cell(s) for inter-network handover. The target network has
overlapping radio coverage with the serving network but not necessarily with the visited network.
continuity of an active call across the handover procedure, where this would be possible for intra-operator
handover;
charging, billing and accounting for inter-network handover should be according to the principles defined in
UMTS 22.15. For R'99 the mechanisms currently used in GSM should be provided as a minimum (charging
for handover leg is based on vistited network tariff, etc., settlement between operators is based on bulk
metering, etc.);
the ability to check with the home network whether the user is permitted to handover from the visited network
to a target network;
the decision whether the handover request is accepted must be taken by the target network;
invocation of the handover procedure only occurs if the target network provides the radio channel type
required for the respective call;
the avoidance of "network hopping", i.e. successive handover procedures between neighbouring networks for
the same call;
the possibility of user notification of inter network HO (eg possible tariff change) when it occurs.
4.2.5 Security
Security requirements relating to handover shall be elaborated in a separate document (UMTS 33.21, security
requirements), but should embody the principle that handover shall not compromise the security of: the network
providing the new radio resources; the (possibly different) network providing the original radio resources; and the
terminalUE. The security mechanisms should also cater for appropriate authentication processes and meet the
requirements of national administrations in terms of lawful interception.
5
To
From
Terrestrial Cellular
Fixed/Cordless
Satellite
Terrestrial Cellular
Fixed/Cordless
Satellite
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
when the UE performs handover to GSM then the service requirements of GSM that relate to handover
between different cells in different location areas is taken as the benchmark. It is not the intention to setmore
stringent service requirements for UMTS to GSM handover than are already commonly accepted for handover
within GSM.