Production Technology of ROPS Cab: Technical Paper
Production Technology of ROPS Cab: Technical Paper
Production Technology of ROPS Cab: Technical Paper
Takahiro Noguchi
Tatsushi Itoh
Rollover is responsible for many of the operator accidents of hydraulic excavators. Protection of operators during rollover is very important and a structure that significantly increases the cab strength has been required also for Komatsu to install a cab that meets the Rollover Protective Structure (ROPS) safety standard.
This will increase the machine weight and manufacturing cost due to a change in the manufacturing method.
This paper describes the production technology developed involving simultaneous actions in the design phase
and all processes (from material processing to the finishing process) to build a cost-minimal production system
in order to overcome these disadvantages.
Key Words: Cab, ROPS, Simultaneous actions, High-accuracy temporary assembly, Automated welding,
Searchless welding, Visualization
1. Introduction
Safety regulations on the structure of cabs to protect the
operator in rollover have been in place for bulldozers and other
machines from early on. In March 2003, the Japan Construction Mechanization Association (JCMAS) established safety
regulations also on hydraulic excavators, followed by the
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in December 2008. Komatsu has had to comply with these regulations.
In cooperation with our
design and purchasing departments, a structure and
production system meeting
the standards were built, as
reported hereunder.
4. Development Work
A cab with a Roll Over Protection Structure (ROPS) is required to be seven times stronger than a conventional cab and
thus dramatic modification is needed. The structure was
changed from a sheet-metal spot welding structure in the past
to an arc welding structure built on steel pipes as a framework.
Both the weight and amount of weld deposition significantly
increased (Figs. 3, 4).
PC200-7
Pipe
(5.5t) Panel (3.2t)
(5.5t)
PC200-8
Anti-noise
(3.2t)
measure
Panel (1.6t)
(1.6t)
Panel (3.2t)
(3.2t)
Anti-noise
measure
Panel
(1.4t)
(1.4t)
Combination
of outer and
&
inner panels
Pipes
(1.6t)
Panel
(1.6t)
(3.23.5t)
(3.2
- 3.5t)
Deformed
pipes
(4.2t)
(4.2t)
Member
Panels
Pipe
Welding
Framework
Development targets
Aim
Lower material grade
Blanking process
discontinued
High-accuracy bending
High-accuracy 3D cutting
High-accuracy temporary
assembly system
100% automated welding
Searchless welding
Finish
Framework
Excessive finish
discontinued
4.1
Raw materials
Target
Material SPCC
Discontinued
Flatness 2mm or less
Clearance 1mm or les
Clearance 1mm or les
100% automated
100% searchless
welding
Tension
Discontinued
Wrinkling
Former model
New model
Fewer processes by
simplifying shape
136mm
220mm
R45
R204
Radius shape that
can be formed in
one process
100mm
60mm
Structure has hinge plate
exposed to the outside and
drawing depth is reduced
Fig. 6
Slit blade
Shape of
radius
Slit blade
Shape of radius
Fig. 7
Research results
Small
R
radius
200R
200R
Large
R
radius
6500R
6500R
Fig. 8
Shape of A-pillar
Large
R
radius
6500R
6500R
Figure 11 summarizes the impacts of each machining condition on bend quality. By selecting appropriate machining
conditions, pipes can be bent, but ranges of condition are small
and conditions must be managed strictly.
Fig. 11
Fig. 10
Simulation analysis
Fig. 13
Flatness of A-pillar
Conventional joint
New joint
Fig. 14
Pipe joint
Fig. 16
4.2
Welding process
Location
where new
is used
joint
3D pipe cutter
In searchless welding, works need to be assembled tentatively at a high accuracy. As mentioned above, technology
for machine members at a high accuracy was developed and
new ideas for temporary assembly jigs were also needed. For
the structure of the temporary assembly jig, the conventional
method of temporarily assembling works while forcibly distorting works by a constraint using a cylinder was revised. A
method to temporarily assemble high-accuracy members without applying a forcible constraint and to constrain them as they
were by a clamp was devised (Fig. 17).
A member is sandwiched
between A-subpillars
Fig. 19
Fig. 17
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
0.5
1.5
Fig. 18
Robot system
5.
Fig. 20
Member
Process
Member
Welding
Finish
6.
Fig. 21
4.3
Finishing process
Objective
Lower grade of
material
Panel
Discontinue
blanking process
High-accuracy
bending
Pipe
High-accuracy
3D cutting
High-accuracy
temporary
assembly
Framework 100% automated
welding
Searchless
welding
Frame- Discontinue
work excessive finish
Target
Degree of accomplishment
Material SPCC
SPCC
Discontinued
Flatness 2mm or
better
Clearance 1mm
or less
Discontinued
2mm or
less
1mm or
less
Clearance 1mm
or less
1mm or
less
: Accomplished
100% automated
100%
100% searchless
welding
95%
: Not
accomplished
Discontinued
Discontinued
Subsequent Activities
6.1
Fig. 22
ROPS analysis
7.
Fig. 23
6.2
Conclusion
Tatsushi Itoh
Entered Komatsu in 1984.
Welding Procedure Team,
Manufacturing Engineering Development
Center, Production Division.
Fig. 24
Fig. 25