The Forecasting of Natural Gas Hydrate by Using P-T Figure Method in Gas Well
The Forecasting of Natural Gas Hydrate by Using P-T Figure Method in Gas Well
The Forecasting of Natural Gas Hydrate by Using P-T Figure Method in Gas Well
and adhere to the pipe wall, even block the entire pipeline.
Considering the coupling of temperature and pressure, this
reduce.
engineering requirement.
Introduction
wellhead.
[1]
of forming
Due to its gas liquid ratio is much higher than the oil well,
dew point that in natural gas and there should be free water
distribution in the gas evenly and the well flow will looked
www.ijeart.com
2
2
2d 4 I j I j 1 g cos l j l j 1
L qL b2 mG qGsc i
106
p j p j 1
I j 1 I j b q 2
2
2
3
Gsc
qL b1 qGsc
I
I
l
1
j
j
j
1
5
2
4d i
V V
p p
l l 2C l l
g cos
g cos
j 1
Tfj Tej e
A L j L j 1
T
f
j 1
Te j 1
1 e
A L j L j 1
j 1
Jm
j 1
pm
j 1
pm
-17
are
thermodynamic
project.
based
on
Van
der
model.
Waals-Platteeuw
statistical
Thermodynamics
method
formation prediction.
wellbore.
Hydrate formation prediction
There are three methods that we often used to prediction
hydrate, P-T figure method, Bono maleev method and
thermodynamics method. Among them, the P-T figure
method is the method that predict with the hydrate
formation characteristics. For some natural that its relative
density is certain and its under a certainly temperature or
pressure, then the pressure or temperature to form natural
gas hydrate is also certain. With the temperature and
pressure distribution in the wellbore, we can get the results
through compared the hydrate formation pressure and
temperature chart or directly through iterative calculation.
This method is simple in calculationeasy to use and with a
high precision. Bono maleev sort out experimental data and
www.ijeart.com
Table 1 iterative formula for the lowest pressure that will formation hydrate when the temperature has been known
Relative density
1.27T16.33
P=e^(0.14202T+2.5248)0.02618
16.33T26.27
P=e^(0.21204T+3.7696)0.002355
1.05T16.72
P=e^(0.13644T+2.4256)0.03567
16.72T25.88
P=e^(0.20808T+3.6992)0.00302
0.5T17.94
P=e^(0.13176T+2.3420)0.04813
17.94T25.5
P=e^(0.20916T+3.7184)0.003177
0.5T18.38
P=e^(0.12816T+2.2784)0.06543
18.38T25
P=e^(0.20862T+2.7088)0.00368
0.38T19.5
P=e^(0.12078T+2.1472)0.11428
19.5T23.61
P=e^(0.23958T+4.2592)0.00137
0.5T14.77
P=e^(0.10512T+1.8688)0.3997
14.77T20.72
P=e^(0.13878T+2.4672)0.13159
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.55
G is between rg1
P=P1-(P2-P1)( rg1- rg)/( rg1- rg2)
and rg2
(1) rgThe relative density of gas rg1 rg rg2
Using the
(2) P1P2The pressure to formation hydrate when the temperature has be known
interpolation
and the relative density of gas were rg1 and rg2
method
Table 2 iterative formula for the lowest temperature that wont formation hydrate when the pressure has been known
Relative density
0.4137P3.4475
T=log(p/3.7973)7.04-17.78
3.4475P27.58
T=log(p/0.3416)4.716-17.78
0.4826P4.137
T=log(p/5.1738)7.42-17.78
4.137P27.58
T=log(p/0.4382)4.086-17.78
0.5516P5.516
T=log(p/6.9808)7.5896-17.78
5.516P27.58
T=log(p/0.4608)4.781-17.78
1.0
0.9
0.8
www.ijeart.com
T=log(p/9.4891)7.8027-17.78
6.895P27.58
T=log(p/0.5338)4.7934-17.78
1.03425P10.3425
T=log(p/16.5738)8.28-17.78
10.3425P27.58
T=log(p/0.199)4.174-17.78
2.758P12.06625
T=log(p/57.9679)9.513-17.78
12.06625P27.58
T=log(p/19.0849)7.20565-17.78
0.7
0.6
0.55
G is between rg1
T=T1-(T2-T1)( rg1- rg)/( rg1- rg2)
and rg2
1
rgThe relative density of gas rg1 rg rg2
Using the
2
T1T2The temperature to formation hydrate when the pressure has be
interpolation
known and the relative density of gas were rg1 and rg2
method
calculation example
There are gas composition and production data of two
4.
CH4
C2H6
C3H8
C4H10
N2
CO2
H2S
others
the well
/%
/%
/%
/%
/%
/%
/%
/%
78.40
6.00
3.60
2.40
9.40
0.20
0.00
0.00
96.96
0.18
0.04
0.00
0.64
2.18
0.00
0.00
No.1 well
No.2 well
120
105
40
31
Well depth/m
4728
3708.8
Geothermal gradient/(/m)
0.025
0.0298
0.177 8
0.177 8
0.24
0.24
www.ijeart.com
0.073
0.073
Gas viscosity/(mPas)
0.02
0.018
Relative density
0.63
0.5767
Water production/(m3/d)
13.541
11.342
4.5710-5
4.5710-5
1.717
2.2
0.002 65
0.00864
97200
60000
Measured values
error
predictive value
Wellhead pressure/MPa
30.80
28.56
7.27%
Wellhead temperature/
33.22
32.45
2.3%
Measured values
error
predictive value
Wellhead pressure /MPa
25.40
24.15
4.9%
Wellhead temperature /
16.61
15.98
3.8%
200-300
225
conclusion
www.ijeart.com
200054:58-63.
10Li C J, Yang Y. The prediction of forming conditions and prevent
Among
them,
temperature,
pressure,
gas
Gas, 19972603:160-162.
Tutor, mainly engaged in the teaching and research work of oil drilling
equipment. Email:fanqiang818@sina.com
the
Email:jiusongtao@163.com
study
and
research
of
mechanical
engineering.
study
Email:1185469117@qq.com.
[8]
and
research
work
of
hydrate
mining
and
delivery.
[9]
work
study
[10] [11]
and
research
work
of
mechanical
engineering.
Email:1123670591@qq.com.
gas
well[J].Oil
Drilling
&
Production
Technology,2001,23(06):46-49.
3Mao W, Liang Z. The wellbore pressure and temperature coupling
analysis[J]. Natural Gas Industry,1999,19(06):66-69.
4Wan S L,WAN S J, Wang Q etc. The forecasting methods and
application of natural gas hydrate formation [J]. Petrochemical
Industry Application,2011,30(10):91-93.
5Li W G, Yi G J, Liu W B etc. Introduction of the prediction method
of
hydrate
formation[J].
Drilling
Production
Technology,2008,31(B08):91-93.
6Li S L etc. Natural gas engineering [M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry
Press, 2000305.
7Yang J S, Liu J Y. Practical calculation of gas recovery [M]. Beijing:
Petroleum Industry Press, 1994100-102
8Lv J X, Ma D Z, Yang Z X. The formation of hydrate in gas well and
solving measures[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2001S1:111-112.
www.ijeart.com