Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Temperature Drop Calculation
Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Temperature Drop Calculation
Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Temperature Drop Calculation
INTRODUCTION
[a]
Abstract
127
1. PHYSICAL MODEL
As buried line contains enormous advantages, such as little
limiting factors about terrain and surface features, shortening
transportation range, safety seal, free of bad weather and
long-term stable operation. So it gets common application in
the petroleum pipeline engineering. Figure 1 is diagrammatic
drawing about buried Natural gas pipeline.
Soil
h
Table 1
The Illustrates Dimensionless Number of Several
Hydrocarbons C
insulating
Con
T
duit
d1
Natur
d2
al gas
Figure 1
Schematic Diagram of Buried Gas Pipeline
T T
(1)
CP CV =
2 P
T
Above formula: CP is mass heat capacity at constant
pressure, kJ/(kmolK); CV is mass heat capacity at constant
volume, kJ/(kmolK); T is temperature of the actual gas,
K; is density of The actual gas, kg/m3; P is presure of
the actual gas, Pa.
2.2 Viscosity
The viscosity of one component gas depends on
temperature and pressure, but component of gas also is an
important factor to decide viscosity of gas mixture. The
viscosity of gas mixture rises with temperature increasing.
The approximate formula that temperature effect on gas
dynamic viscosity is:
1.5
273 + C T
T = 0
(2)
T + C 273
Above formula: T is gas dynamic viscosity when
temperature is T, Pa s; 0 is gas dynamic viscosity
Name
Methane
Ethane
Propane
Butane
Isobutane
Pentane
Ethylene
Propylene
Butene
C
164
252
278
377
368
383
225
321
329
Temperature/
20 - 250
20 - 250
20 - 250
20 - 120
20 - 120
122 - 300
20 - 250
20 - 120
20 - 120
273 + C T
= 0
(3)
T + C 273
Above formula: is actual gas heat conduction
coefficient, W/(mK); 0 is gas heat conduction coefficient
when temperature is 273 K, W/(mK); C is dimensionless
number associated with the kind of gas.
2.3.2 The Effect of Pressure on Gas Heat Conduction
Coefficient
The heat conduction coefficient of one component gas is
calculated according to the reduced density r when the
pressure is high.
r < 0.5
Zc5
( 0 ) =
Zc5
( 0 ) =
Zc5
( 0 ) =
( 2.69654 10 ) ( e
4
( 2.51972 10 ) ( e
0.535 r
0.67 r
1.069 ) (5)
1.155 r
+ 2.016 ) (6)
( 5.74673 10 ) ( e
5
1) (4)
Above formula: r is gas compared density; 0 is lowpressure gas heat conduction coefficient, W(mK); Zc is
critical compression.
3 . H Y D R A U L I C C A L C U L AT I O N O F
NATURAL GAS IN PIPELINE
3.1 Flow of Gas
Pipeline gas flow rate is calculated as:
128
QZT
(7)
Pd12
x
(8)
L
In the formula, p Q describes the calculation of the
starting pressure of the gas pipeline or the stop pressure
upstream of the compressor station, MPa; Pz stands for
the calculation of the ending pressure of the gas pipeline
or the outbound pressure downstream of the compressor
station for the gas pipeline, MPa.
PQ 2 ( PQ 2 PZ 2 )
Px =
d
d
1
1
1
1
1
ln 2 +
ln 3 +
=+
(9)
Kd 1d1 2g d1 2b d 2 2 d3
PQ PZ
(1 ax ) (10)
aL
In the formula, p Q stands for the starting pipeline
pressure, Pa; pZ is the ending pipeline pressure, Pa; L is
the pipe length, m; T is the gas temperature, K or ; T0 is
the ground temperature of burial deep pipeline in the, K or
; Di joules-Thomson coefficient, /MPa.
=0 +(
ax
129
C2H6
1.511
C3H8
0.129
n-C4H10 i-C4H10
0.033
0.011
CO2
3.333
N2
2.61
us =2.3 105
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10 0
Figure 2
The Dropping Curves of the Pressure of Gas Pipeline
5.4 Comparing the Impact of Various Parameters
on the Dropping of the Temperature
In order to analyze the impact of various factors, enlarging
or narrowing some of the Setting value[10]. Set the length
of the Pipe is 15,000 m, other parameters are the same as
the parameters from Xushen sixth gas gathering station to
the song-associated gas pipeline. The consulting results of
the impact of Pipeline are shown in Figures 3-13.
Gastemperature/
10
0
Gas temperature/
70
70
60
50
40
30
20
Methane
Ethane
5,000
10,000
60
20
10
0
0
40
30
20
10
0
0
5,000
10,000
From the nozzle length/m
133*5
219*7
377*7
40
30
20
10
5,000
10,000
From the nozzle length/m
Gas temperature/
10
5,000
10,000
15,000
Figure 8
The Dropping of Temperature of Different Starting
Pressure Along the Pipe
70
60
TerminalPressure 15 MPa
50
40
30
20
10
0
Length 5,000 m
Length 10,000 m
Length 20,000 m
20
10
5,000
10,000
From the nozzle length/m
15,000
Figure 9
The Dropping of Temperature of Different Ending
Pressure Along the Pipe
70
Gas temperature/
70
30
20
15,000
Figure 5
The Dropping of Temperature of Different Diameter
Along the Pipe
40
30
0
0
50
40
60
StartingPressure 15 MPa
50
Gas temperature/
Gas temperature/
70
50
60
15,000
Figure 4
The Dropping of Temperature of Different Content of
Water Vapor Along the Pipe
60
15,000
70
Gas temperature/
Gas temperature/
50
5,000
10,000
From the nozzle length/m
Figure 7
The Dropping of Temperature of Different Flow Along
the Pipe
60
30
70
40
15,000
Figure 3
The Impact of the Content of Methane and Ethane on
the Dropping of the Temperature
50
60
50
40
30
= 0.1W/(mK)
= 0.3W/(mK)
= 0.5W/(mK)
20
10
0
0
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
From the nozzle length/m
20,000
Figure 6
The Dropping of Temperature of Different Length
Along the Pipe
5,000
10,000
From the nozzle length/m
15,000
Figure 10
The Dropping of Temperature of Different Thermal
Conductivity of the Insulation Layer Along the Pipe
130
Gas temperature/
70
60
50
40 mm
60 mm
80 mm
40
30
20
10
0
0
5,000
10,000
From the nozzle length/m
15,000
Gas temperature/
Figure 11
The Dropping of Temperature of Different Thickness
of Thermal Conductivity Along the Pipe
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0
500
1,000
1,500
REFERENCES
2,000
Figure 12
The Dropping of Temperature of Different Starting
Pressure Along the Pipe
Gas temperature/
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
Figure 13
The Dropping of Temperature of Different Ending
Pressure Along the Pipe
CONCLUSION
(a) Gas composition, the length, the task flow start and
end pressure and the thickness of the insulation layer have
131
[1] Yao, L., Zhang, L. N., & Zhao, Y. (2004). Present situation
and development trend of the natural gas storage and
transportation technology. Natural Gas Economy, (5), 63-66.
[2] Shen, W. D., Jiang, Z. M., & Dong, J. D. (2001).
Engineering thermodynamics (3rd ed.). Beijing: Higher
Education Press.
[3] Wang, S. L., Zhao, Z. Y., & Wang, S. H. (1999).
Temperature drop calculation method of oil gas gathering
and transportation pipelines. Oilfield Surface Engineering,
18(2), 22-25.
[4] Yang, S. M. (2006). Heat transfer (4th ed.) (pp. 4-6).
Beijing: Higher Education Press.
[5] Tao, W. S. (2000). Recent progress in computational heat
transfer (pp. 1-16, 33-37). Beijing: Science Press.
[6] Liu, J. L., Liu, J., & Ren, H. (2010). Discussion on natural
gas hydrate sampling height. Oil Field Equipment, 39(10),
12-15.
[7] Li, W. C., Wang, F. J., & Li, Y. M. (2006). Long distance
pipeline analysis and evaluation of the total heat transfer
coefficient of. Oilfield Surface Engineering, 25(10), 20-21.
[8] Li, C. J. (2000). Pipeline transportation of natural gas (pp.
86-94). Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press.
[9] Liu, D. S., Gong, J., & Wu, H. H. (2010). The 3 phase flow
experimental research progress of. Oil Field Machinery and
Oil Gas Water Level Tube, 39(4), 9-16.
[10] Li, J., Wang, P., & Wang, H. X. (2009). Drop law. Journal
of Higher School of Petrochemical Pipeline Temperature
Exposed, 22(1), 73-75.