Anaphylaxis Articulo
Anaphylaxis Articulo
Anaphylaxis Articulo
David Fischer
Abstract
Anaphylaxis is an acute, potentially fatal systemic reaction with varied mechanisms and clinical
presentations. Although prompt recognition and treatment of anaphylaxis are imperative, both
patients and healthcare professionals often fail to recognize and diagnose early signs and
symptoms of the condition. Clinical manifestations vary widely, however, the most common signs
are cutaneous symptoms, including angioedema, urticaria, erythema and pruritus. Immediate
intramuscular administration of epinephrine into the lateral thigh is first-line therapy, even if the
diagnosis is uncertain. The mainstays of long-term management include specialist assessment,
avoidance measures, and the provision of an epinephrine auto-injector and an individualized
anaphylaxis action plan. This article provides an overview of the causes, clinical features, diagnosis
and acute and long-term management of this serious allergic reaction.
Introduction
Anaphylaxis is defined as a serious allergic reaction that is rapid in onset and may cause death
[1, 2]. The prevalence of anaphylaxis is estimated to be as high as 2%, and appears to be rising,
particularly in the younger age group [3, 4, 5].
The more rapidly anaphylaxis develops, the more likely the reaction is to be severe and lifethreatening [4]. Therefore, prompt recognition and management of the condition are imperative.
However, anaphylaxis is often under-recognized and treated inadequately. Diagnosis and
management are challenging since reactions are often immediate and unexpected. Furthermore,
there is no single test to diagnose anaphylaxis in routine clinical practice [3, 6]. This article will
provide an overview of the causes and clinical features of anaphylaxis as well as strategies for the
accurate diagnosis and management of the condition.
Causes
Most episodes of anaphylaxis are triggered through an immunologic mechanism involving
immunoglobulin E (IgE) which leads to mast cell and basophil activation and the subsequent
release of inflammatory mediators such as histamine, leukotrienes, tryptase and prostaglandins.
Although any substance has the potential to cause anaphylaxis, the most common causes of IgEmediated anaphylaxis are: foods, particularly, peanuts, tree nuts, shellfish and fish, cows milk, eggs
and wheat; medications (most commonly penicillin), and natural rubber latex. Exercise, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opiates, and radiocontrast agents can also cause
anaphylaxis, but anaphylactic reactions to these agents often result from non-IgE-mediated
mechanisms. In other cases, the cause of anaphylactic reactions is unknown (idiopathic
anaphylaxis). In children, anaphylaxis is most often caused by foods, while venom- and drug-
induced anaphylaxis is more common in adults [4, 7, 8, 9]. Table 1 provides a more comprehensive
list of the potential causes of anaphylaxis.
Table 1
Causes of anaphylaxis.
Common:
Foods: most commonly peanuts, tree nuts, egg, seafood and fish, cows milk, wheat
Medications: most commonly antibiotics
Insect stings (bees and wasps)
Natural rubber latex
Skin
Urticaria (hives)
Angioedema (swelling)
Erythema (flushing)
Pruritus (itching)
Less common:
Gastrointestinal:
Nausea
Vomiting
Abdominal pain
Diarrhea
Respiratory:
Exercise
Upper airway:
Semen
Neurologic:
Nasal congestion
Food additives: monosodium glutamate, metabisulfite
Light-headedness
Sneezing
Hormonal changes: menstrual factors
Dizziness
Topical medications
Confusion
Hoarseness
Cough
Transfusions
Oropharyngeal
Co-morbidities
or laryngeal edema
and concurrent medications may also affect the severity of anaphylactic reactions
and patient response to treatment. For example, patients with asthma and cardiovascular disease
are more likely to experience a poor outcome from anaphylaxis. Concurrent administration of beta Lower airway: dyspnea
blockers can interfere with the patient's ability to respond to epinephrine, the first-line of treatment
Oral:
for anaphylaxis (discussed later). Furthermore, the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)
Bronchospasms
inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) can impact a patients compensatory
physiologic response to anaphylaxis, leading toItching
more severe reactions [10].
Wheezing
Tingling
or swelling
of theis
lips,
tonguefollowing
or palateexposure to an allergen:
Anaphylaxis is highly likely when any 1 of
the following
3 criteria
fulfilled
Chest tightness
1 Acute onset of an illness (minutes to several hours) with involvement of the skin, mucosal tissue, or both
Cardiovascular:
hives, pruritus or flushing, swollen lips-tongue-uvula) and at least 1 of the following:
Hypotension
Other:
a. Respiratory compromise (e.g. dyspnea, wheeze, bronchospasm, stridor, reduced PEF, hypoxemia)
Dizziness
Syncope
Tachycardia
Anaphylaxis is highly likely when any 1 of the following 3 criteria is fulfilled following exposure to an allergen:
b. Respiratory compromise (e.g., dyspnea, wheeze, bronchospasm, stridor, reduced PEF, hypoxemia)
c. Reduced BP or associated symptoms (e.g., hypotonia [collapse], syncope, incontinence)
d. Persistent GI symptoms (e.g., painful abdominal cramps, vomiting)
Reduced BP after exposure to a known allergen for that patient (minutes to several hours):
3
a. Infants and children: low systolic BP (age specific) or > 30% decrease in systolic BP *
b. Adults: systolic BP < 90 mmHg or > 30% decrease from that persons baseline
Diagnosis
The diagnosis of anaphylaxis is based primarily on clinical signs and symptoms, as well as a
detailed description of the acute episode, including antecedent activities and events. Diagnostic
criteria for anaphylaxis were published by a multidisciplinary group of experts in 2005 and 2006,
and are shown in Table 3[1, 2]. A diagnosis of anaphylaxis is highly likely when any one of the
criteria listed in Table 3 is fulfilled. Since the evaluation and diagnosis of anaphylaxis is often
complex, referral to an allergist with training and expertise in the identification and management of
anaphylaxis should be considered.
Table 3
Clinical criteria for diagnosing anaphylaxis [1, 2]
PEF = Peak expiratory flow; BP: blood pressure; GI: gastrointestinal
* Low systolic blood pressure for children is age specific and defined as: < 70 mmHg for age 1
month to 1 year; < 70mmHg + [2 x age] for age 1 to 10 years; < 90mmHg for age 11 to 17 years.
History
The history is the most important tool to establish the cause of anaphylaxis and should take
precedence over diagnostic tests. It should elicit information about clinical manifestations (e.g.,
urticaria, angioedema, flushing, pruritus, airway obstruction, gastrointestinal symptoms, syncope,
and hypotension); agents encountered before the reaction, such as foods, medications or insect
bites/stings, as well as the patients activities preceding the event (e.g., exercise, sexual activity).
The absence of cutaneous symptoms puts the diagnosis in question since the majority of
anaphylactic episodes include cutaneous symptoms; however, their absence does not rule out
anaphylaxis [4].
Differential diagnosis
Other diagnoses that might present with signs and/or symptoms characteristic of anaphylaxis
should be excluded. The most common conditions that mimic anaphylaxis include: vasodepressor
(vasovagal/neurocardiogenic) reactions (which are characterized by hypotension, pallor,
bradycardia, weakness, nausea and vomiting); acute respiratory decompensation from severe
asthma attacks, foreign body aspiration and pulmonary embolism; vocal cord dysfunction; acute
anxiety (e.g., panic attack or hyperventilation syndrome); myocardial dysfunction, acute poisoning;
hypoglycemia; and seizure disorders [4,14].
Treatment
Acute management
The acute treatment of anaphylaxis begins with rapid assessment of the airway, breathing and
circulation. Epinephrine is the drug of choice for anaphylaxis and should be given immediately to
any patient with a suspected anaphylactic episode. Treatment should be provided even if the
diagnosis is uncertain since there here are no contraindications to the use of epinephrine [6].
The recommended dosing of epinephrine for the acute treatment of anaphylaxis is 0.01 mg/kg up to
a maximum of 0.5 mg administered intramuscularly every 520 min as necessary [6]. Intramuscular
administration into the lateral thigh is recommended as it allows for more rapid absorption and
higher plasma epinephrine levels compared to subcutaneous administration [10]. Glucagon should
also be considered in patients using beta-blockers.
All patients receiving emergency epinephrine must be transported to hospital immediately (ideally
by ambulance) for evaluation and observation. Patients should also be placed in a recumbent
(supine) position with the lower extremities elevated, unless this is precluded by shortness of breath
or vomiting [6, 15, 16].
As mentioned earlier, patients with asthma, particularly those with poorly controlled asthma, are at
increased risk of a fatal reaction. In these patients, anaphylaxis may be mistaken for an asthma
exacerbation and inappropriately treated solely with asthma inhalers. Therefore, if there are ongoing
asthma symptoms in an individual with known anaphylaxis, epinephrine should be given [6].
Oxygen therapy should also be considered in any patient with symptoms of anaphylaxis, particularly
for those with prolonged reactions. Intravenous fluids (crystalloid solutions or colloid volume
expanders) should also be provided since massive fluid shifts can occur rapidly in anaphylaxis due
to increased vascular permeability. Volume replacement is particularly important for patients whose
hypotension persists despite epinephrine injections. Supportive therapy such as inhaled beta 2agonists (for patients experiencing bronchospasm) and antihistamines (for control of cutaneous
symptoms) can also be helpful, but should never replace epinephrine as first-line therapy.
Vasopressors, such as dopamine, can also be considered if epinephrine injections and volume
expansion with intravenous fluids fail to alleviate hypotension. Glucocorticosteroids have a slow
onset of action and, therefore, these agents have not been shown to be effective for the acute
treatment of anaphylaxis. Theoretically, however, they may prevent biphasic or protracted reactions
and, hence, are often given on an empirical basis. To date, there is no conclusive evidence that the
administration of glucocorticosteroids prevents a biphasic response [4].
If intramuscular epinephrine and intravenous fluids fail to improve anaphylactic symptoms,
intravenous infusions of epinephrine may be required; however, these infusions should be given by
a physician who is trained and experienced in its use and has the capacity for continuous blood
pressure and cardiac monitoring. Figure 1 provides a simplified algorithm for the acute management
of anaphylaxis.
Figure 1
Simplified algorithm for the acute management of anaphylaxis. IV: intravenous *Should be
given by a physician trained in the use of IV epinephrine with capacity for continuous blood
pressure and cardiac monitoring
Following acute treatment, patients should be observed for a period of time due to the risk of a
biphasic response or possible recurrence of the reaction as epinephrine wears off. The observation
period should be individualized based on the severity of the initial reaction and access to care.
Experts have recommended observing patients for 4 to 6 hours following an anaphylactic reaction,
with prolonged observation times for patients with severe or refractory symptoms [6].
Long-term management
The mainstays of long-term management for patients who have experienced an anaphylactic
episode include: specialist assessment, a prescription for an epinephrine auto-injector, patient and
caregiver education on avoidance measures, and the provision of an individualized anaphylaxis
action plan.
Specialist assessment
After acute anaphylaxis, patients should be assessed for their future risk of anaphylaxis, ideally by
an allergist. These specialists are experienced in identifying and confirming the cause of
anaphylaxis, educating patients on appropriate avoidance strategies, drafting an anaphylaxis action
plan, and advising whether immunotherapy is appropriate [4, 6].
causing anaphylactic reactions, it may be helpful to educate patients about possible management
options, such as medication pretreatment and use of low osmolarity agents in patients with a history
of reactions to radiographic contrast media, or induction of drug tolerance procedures (also known
as drug desensitization) [4]. Induction of drug tolerance procedures temporarily modify a patients
immunologic or non-immunologic response to a drug through the administration of incremental
doses of the drug. However, drug tolerance is usually maintained only as long as the drug is
administered; therefore, the procedure needs to be repeated in the future if the patient requires the
drug again after finishing a prior therapeutic course (for more information, see article on Drug
Allergy in this supplement).
Patients who have had an anaphylactic reaction to an insect sting should be advised about
avoidance measures to reduce the risk of future stings. Such measures include: being alert when
eating outdoors (as wasps are attracted to food), wearing shoes and long pants when in fields, and
having nests or hives near the patients home removed [14]. Patients who have previously
experienced venom-induced anaphylaxis are often candidates for venom immunotherapy, which is
successful in preventing anaphylaxis in up to 98% of patients (see article on Allergen
Immunotherapy in this supplement).
Subjects at high risk of a reaction to latex include: healthcare workers, children with spina bifida and
genitourinary abnormalities; and workers with occupational exposure to latex. Patients with spina
bifida (regardless of a history of latex allergy) and patients with a positive history of latex allergy
should have all medical-surgical-dental procedures performed in a latex-safe environment. This is
an environment in which no natural rubber latex gloves are used in the room or surgical suite and in
which there are limited latex-based accessories (catheters, adhesives, tourniquets, anesthesia
equipment or devices) which come in contact with the patient [4].
Patients should also obtain and wear medical identification (such as a MedicAlert bracelet/necklace)
that indicates that they have experienced anaphylaxis as well as the responsible agent. Patients
should also be instructed to avoid drugs that might increase their susceptibility and/or complicate
the management of an anaphylactic event, such as beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, or ARBs [4].
Contact details
Names and contact details for emergencies, including family members, allergist/immunologist and family doc
Contact details for local emergency or ambulance services
Allergens/Triggers
Clear identification of allergens/triggers to be avoided
Include generic and proprietary names of drugs and possible cross-sensitivities, if relevant
How to recognize the signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis
Mouth: itching, swelling of lips/tongue
Throat: itching, tightness, closure, hoarseness
Contact details
Names and contact details for emergencies, including family members, allergist/immunologist and family doc
Contact details for local emergency or ambulance services
Epinephrine auto-injectors (first-line); should include detailed instructions (with photographs, if possible) on how to c
the auto-injector device (for daycare, school and/or office staff)
Antihistamines (for cutaneous symptoms)
Inhaled beta2-agonists (for bronchospasm)
Where medication is stored at home, work or school
A comprehensive, individualized anaphylaxis action plan should be prepared which defines roles
and responsibilities and emergency protocols [6]. Important information that should be included in
this plan is shown in Table 4[6, 18]. Examples of such a plan, along with other relevant information
and materials, can be downloaded at Anaphylaxis Canada (http://www.anaphylaxis.ca) or the Food
Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network (http://www.foodallergy.org; a US-based association). Action plans
should be reviewed annually and updated if necessary. A copy of the plan should be made available
to all relevant persons, such as day-care providers, teachers, and employers. Recommendations for
the management of anaphylaxis in schools and other community settings [15] are available through
the Allergy Safe Communities website athttp://www.allergysafecommunities.ca.
Table 4
Components of an anaphylaxis action plan [6, 18]
Conclusions
Anaphylaxis is an acute, potentially fatal systemic reaction with varied mechanisms and clinical
presentations. Prompt recognition and treatment of anaphylaxis are imperative; however, both
patients and healthcare professionals often fail to recognize and diagnose anaphylaxis in its early
stages. Diagnostic criteria which take into account the variable clinical manifestations of
anaphylaxis are now available and can assist healthcare providers in the early recognition of the
condition. Immediate intramuscular administration of epinephrine into the lateral thigh is first-line
therapy for anaphylaxis. Acute management may also involve oxygen therapy, intravenous fluids,
and adjunctive therapies such as antihistamines or inhaled beta 2-agonists. The mainstays of longterm management include specialist assessment, a prescription for an epinephrine auto-injector,
patient and caregiver education on avoidance measures, and the provision of an individualized
anaphylaxis action plan.
Anaphylaxis is defined as a serious allergic reaction that is rapid in onset and may cause
death.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
This article has been published as part of Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology Volume 7
Supplement 1, 2011: Practical guide for allergy and immunology in Canada. The full contents of the
supplement are available online at http://www.aacijournal.com/supplements/7/S1
Competing interests
Dr. Harold Kim is the past president of the Canadian Network for Respiratory Care and co-chief
editor of Allergy, Asthma &Clinical Immunology. He has received consulting fees and honoraria for
continuing education from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Graceway Pharmaceuticals, King
Pharma, Merck Frosst, Novartis, and Nycomed.
Dr. David Fischer is a member of the Board of Directors of the Canadian Society of Allergy &
Clinical Immunology. He has received consulting fees and honoraria for continuing education from
AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Graceway Pharmaceuticals, King Pharma, Merck Frosst, Novartis,
Paladin Labs and Nycomed.
References
1.
Sampson HA, Munoz-Furlong A, Bock SA, Schmitt C, Bass R, Chowdhury BA, Decker WW,
Furlong TJ, Galli SJ, Golden DB, Gruchalla RS, Harlor AD, Hepner DL, Howarth M, Kaplan AP, Levy
JH, Lewis LM, Lieberman PL, Metcalfe DD, Murphy R, Pollart SM, Pumphrey RS, Rosenwasser LJ,
Simons FE, Wood JP, Camargo CA: Symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis:
summary report. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005, 115: 584-91. 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.01.009.View
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Sampson HA, Munoz-Furlong A, Campbell RL, Adkinson NF, Bock SA, Branum A, Brown
SG, Camargo CA, Cydulka R, Galli SJ, Gidudu J, Gruchalla RS, Harlor AD, Hepner DL, Lewis LM,
Lieberman PL, Metcalfe DD, O'Connor R, Muraro A, Rudman A, Schmitt C, Scherrer D, Simons FE,
Thomas S, Wood JP, Decker WW: Second symposium on the definition and management of
anaphylaxis: summary report Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food
Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006, 117: 391-7.
10.1016/j.jaci.2005.12.1303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
3.
Lieberman PL, Camargo CA, Bohlke K, Jick H, Miller RL, Sheikh A, Simons FE:
Epidemiology of anaphylaxis: findings of the ACAAI Epidemiology of Anaphylaxis Working Group.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006, 97: 596-602. 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61086-1.View
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Lieberman P, Nicklas RA, Oppenheimer J, Kemp SF, Lang DM, Bernstein DI, Bernstein JA,
Burks AW, Feldweg AM, Fink JN, Greenberger PA, Golden DB, James JM, Kemp SF, Ledford DK,
Lieberman P, Sheffer AL, Bernstein DI, Blessing-Moore J, Cox L, Khan DA, Lang D, Nicklas RA,
Oppenheimer J, Portnoy JM, Randolph C, Schuller DE, Spector SL, Tilles S, Wallace D: The
diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis practice parameter: 2010 update. J Allergy Clin
Immunol. 2010, 126: 477-80. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.06.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
6.
Waserman S, Chad Z, Francoeur MJ, Small P, Stark D, Vander Leek TK, Kaplan A, Kastner
M: Management of anaphylaxis in primary care: Canadian expert consensus recommendations.
Allergy. 2010, 65: 1082-92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Braganza SC, Acworth JP, McKinnon DR, Peake JE, Brown AF: Paediatric emergency
department anaphylaxis: different patterns from adults. Arch Dis Child. 2006, 91: 159-63. PubMed
CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Brown SGA: Clinical features and severity grading of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
2004, 114: 371-76. 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.04.029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
10.
Simon FE: Anaphylaxis, killer allergy: long-term management in the community. J Allergy
Clin Immunol. 2006, 117: 367-77. 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.12.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
11.
Webb LM, Lieberman P: Anaphylaxis: a review of 601 cases. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol.
2006, 97: 39-43. 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61367-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
13.
Stark BJ, Sullivan TJ: Biphasic and protracted anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986,
78: 76-83. 10.1016/0091-6749(86)90117-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Ellis AK, Day JH: Diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis. CMAJ. 2003, 169: 30711.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
15.
Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Anaphylaxis in schools & other
settings. 2009, CSACI, 2Google Scholar
16.
Sicherer SH, Simons FE, Section on Allergy and Immunology American Academy of
Pediatrics: Self-injectable epinephrine for first-aid management of anaphylaxis. Pediatrics. 2007,
119: 638-46. 10.1542/peds.2006-3689.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Burks A: Peanut allergy. Lancet. 2008, 371: 1538-46. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)606595.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
18.