Mike Flood Usermanual
Mike Flood Usermanual
Mike Flood Usermanual
1D-2D Modelling
User Manual
Please Note
Copyright
This document refers to proprietary computer software which is protected
by copyright. All rights are reserved. Copying or other reproduction of
this manual or the related programs is prohibited without prior written
consent of DHI Water & Environment (DHI). For details please refer to
your 'DHI Software Licence Agreement'.
Limited Liability
The liability of DHI is limited as specified in Section III of your 'DHI
Software Licence Agreement':
'IN NO EVENT SHALL DHI OR ITS REPRESENTATIVES (AGENTS
AND SUPPLIERS) BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INDIRECT,
INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR DAMAGES
FOR LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SAVINGS, BUSINESS
INTERRUPTION, LOSS OF BUSINESS INFORMATION OR OTHER
PECUNIARY LOSS ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF OR THE INABILITY TO USE THIS DHI SOFTWARE PRODUCT, EVEN IF DHI
HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
THIS LIMITATION SHALL APPLY TO CLAIMS OF PERSONAL
INJURY TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW. SOME COUNTRIES OR STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, INDIRECT,
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES AND, ACCORDINGLY, SOME PORTIONS
OF THESE LIMITATIONS MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU. BY YOUR
OPENING OF THIS SEALED PACKAGE OR INSTALLING OR
USING THE SOFTWARE, YOU HAVE ACCEPTED THAT THE
ABOVE LIMITATIONS OR THE MAXIMUM LEGALLY APPLICABLE SUBSET OF THESE LIMITATIONS APPLY TO YOUR PURCHASE OF THIS SOFTWARE.'
Printing History
November 2006
Edition: 2007
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.1 General Approach to Modelling with MIKE FLOOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.2 How to use this manual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
GENERAL DESCRIPTION . .
2.1 Standard Link . . . . . .
2.2 Lateral Link . . . . . . . .
2.3 Structure Link (Implicit) .
2.4 Urban Link . . . . . . . .
2.5 Zero Flow Link (X and Y)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
APPLICATION DETAILS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1 Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.1 MIKE 21 File Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.2 MIKE 11 File Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.3 Urban File name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.4 Overview of Links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.5 Link Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.6 Coupling Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.7 MIKE 11 River Name/Node ID and Chainage . . . . . . . . .
3.1.8 MIKE 21 Area Number . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.9 MIKE 21 Coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2 The graphical layout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.1 Information on the individual cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.2 Add/Remove Layers ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.3 Link river branches to MIKE 21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.4 Add/Remove Images . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.5 Block out river cells... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Step by step procedure for blocking out cells in the river bed
3.2.6 Link node to MIKE 21 ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3 Options for Standard / Structure Links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3.1 Mom Fact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3.2 Ext Fact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3.3 Add / Replace Momentum Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3.4 Depth Adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3.5 Activation Depth (Minimum and Maximum) . . . . . . . . . .
3.3.6 Exponential Smoothing Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4 Options for Lateral Links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4.1 Side of River . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4.2 Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4.3 Structure Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4.4 Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rectangular Grid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Flexible mesh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 19
. . 19
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
20
21
21
21
23
23
24
25
25
. . 26
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
28
29
31
32
33
35
37
. . 38
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
38
38
39
40
40
40
. . 41
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
41
42
42
42
43
43
3.5
Note . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4.5 Depth Tolerance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4.6 Structure Coefficients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4.7 External Files . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4.8 Additional lateral linkage feature . . . . . . . .
Rectangular Grid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Flexible Mesh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Generating the ASCII file with the invert levels
Options for Urban links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.5.1 Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.5.2 Inlet method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.5.3 Max flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.5.4 Inlet area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.5.5 Crest width . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.5.6 Scaling factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.5.7 Exponent factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 43
43
44
44
45
. 45
. 46
. 46
. . . . . . . . . . 47
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
47
47
47
48
48
48
48
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
49
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
55
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 55
. 56
. 56
. 57
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
7.1 Hydrodynamics - Standard Links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Rectangular grid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
8
Flexible mesh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hydrodynamics - Lateral Links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rectangular Grid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.2.1 Automated cell selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.2.2 Definition of lateral linkage lines . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hydrodynamics - Structure Links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.3.1 Hydrodynamics - Exponential smoothing factor . . . .
Hydrodynamics - Zero Flow Links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hydrodynamics - Urban links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advection-Dispersion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Flow Distribution by Depth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inclusion of Friction Term in Weir Formulae 1 and 2 (Honma)
EXAMPLES . . . . . . . . . . . .
8.1 Standing Wave . . . . . . .
8.2 Lateral Link 1 . . . . . . . .
8.3 Lateral Link 2 . . . . . . . .
8.4 Flow Direction . . . . . . .
8.5 Flood plain Flow . . . . . .
8.6 Floodplain Demonstration
8.7 Urban examples . . . . . .
. . . . . . 66
. . . . . . 66
. . . . . . 66
. . . . . . 69
. . . . . . 70
. . . . . . 71
. . . . . . 73
. . . . . . 74
. . . . . . 74
. . . . . . 75
. . . . . . 76
. . . . . . 77
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
100
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
105
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
10
MIKE FLOOD
INTRODUCTION
MIKE FLOOD is a tool that integrates the one-dimensional models
MOUSE (MIKE URBAN), MIKE 11 and the two-dimensional model
MIKE 21 into a single, dynamically coupled modelling system.
Using a coupled approach enables the best features of both a one -dimensional and two dimensional models to be utilised, whilst at the same time
avoiding many of the limitations of resolution and accuracy encountered
when using MIKE 11, MOUSE or MIKE 21 separately. Special features of
MIKE FLOOD include:
z
Lateral links, enabling simulation of over bank flow from river channel
to flood plain
Manhole links whereby the interaction of the sewer/storm water system may interact with the overland flow
GIS integration
There are many advantages to using MIKE FLOOD and many model
applications can be improved through its use, including:
MIKE FLOOD
Urban drainage
Dam break
User Manual
11
Introduction
1.1
Can model very long or complicated river systems with little computational effort
Is one dimensional, so a true two dimensional description of the overland flow is not possible
12
MIKE FLOOD
Finally the abilities and limitations of MIKE 21 flexible mesh are the following
z
Adaptive time step so that the time step of the 2D part adjusts to the
dynamics
A fine mesh may be needed for resolving rivers and streams in mesh
Consider which of these features are most desirable for your application.
How can you integrate MIKE 11, MOUSE and MIKE 21 to best utilise the
most desirable features, while minimising the bad features? MIKE
FLOOD enables this integration to be performed easily, but it is still the
modeller who decides how best to design the integrated model. This manual will help you to make the decisions on how best to create a MIKE
FLOOD simulation.
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
13
Introduction
1.2
MIKE 11
MOUSE
All link types are links between MIKE 21 and either MIKE 11 or
MOUSE. Further MIKE 21 may either be a rectangular grid version or a
flexible mesh version. The latter only possible if licensed. The various
sections (unless indicated) are applicable to both versions of MIKE 21.
14
MIKE FLOOD
Standard Link
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
There are five different types of MIKE FLOOD links available. Four of
these link MIKE 11 and MIKE 21 whereas the last type is reserved for
linking a node/manhole in MIKE URBAN with one or more cells/elements in MIKE 21. Below follows a description of each of these link
types.
2.1
Standard Link
This is the standard linkage in MIKE FLOOD, where one or more MIKE
21 cells/elements are linked to the end of a MIKE 11 branch. This type of
link is useful for connecting a detailed MIKE 21 grid/mesh into a broader
MIKE 11 network, or to connect an internal structure (with an extent of
more than a grid cell) or feature inside a MIKE 21 grid/mesh. The link is
explicit - see the scientific documentation for a full description. Potential
applications are shown:
Figure 2.1
2.2
Lateral Link
A lateral link allows a string of MIKE 21 cells/elements to be laterally
linked to a given reach in MIKE 11, either a section of a branch or an
entire branch. Flow through the lateral link is calculated using a structure
equation or a QH table. This type of link is particularly useful for simulat-
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
15
General description
Figure 2.2
2.3
16
MIKE FLOOD
Urban Link
Figure 2.3
2.4
Urban Link
The urban link is designed to describe the interaction of water when a
manhole is over topped or when overland flow enters a sewer/storm water
network.
Figure 2.4
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
17
General description
Figure 2.5
The link is designed such that one or more cells/elements in MIKE 21 may
be linked to a manhole/node in MOUSE.
2.5
18
MIKE FLOOD
Definition
APPLICATION DETAILS
Any combination of links can be used in a MIKE FLOOD simulation. All
the information relating to the MIKE FLOOD links is contained in one
file: the coupling file (file extension .COUPLE). The MIKE 11,MIKE 21
and MOUSE simulation files do not contain any information relating specifically to the links, except for:
z
Definition
3.1
Definition
The Definition menu contains information on the simulation files used in
MIKE FLOOD and the general linkage definitions.
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
19
Application details
Figure 3.1
3.1.1
Definition page of the MIKE FLOOD Editor. The set-up shown utilizes a rectangular grid.
Figure 3.2
A button allows for browsing the parameter file. Furthermore, the Edit
MIKE 21 input button allows for opening the existing MIKE 21 parameter file for further editing.
20
MIKE FLOOD
Definition
3.1.2
Figure 3.3
MIKE 11 simulation file path name along with browse and edit buttons. Note the tick box on the left which may be used to select or
deselect whether a MIKE 11 set-up is to be included.
A button allows for browsing the parameter file. Furthermore, the Edit
MIKE 11 input button allows for opening the existing MIKE 11 simulation file for further editing.
3.1.3
3.1.4
Overview of Links
The links may be of the following five different types:
z
MIKE FLOOD
Standard links, the link is the connection between the end of a MIKE
11 branch and a series of MIKE 21 cells or element faces (if a flexible
mesh is used).
User Manual
21
Application details
Lateral links, the link is the connection between one MIKE 11 river
reach (within one branch) and a series of MIKE 21 cells/elements.
Structure links, the link is the connection between the end of a MIKE
11 branch and a series of MIKE 21 cells (same as a standard link).
However, two links are required for each structure link - one for each
end of the structure. These linked links can only be one horizontal
and/or vertical cell apart.
Zero flow links (XFLOW=0 and YFLOW=0), the link is a list of cells
in MIKE 21. There is no corresponding reference to the MIKE 11 simulation.
Urban Link, the link is the connection between one or more cells in
MIKE 21 and a node/manhole in MIKE URBAN/MOUSE.
Table 3.1
Link
Standard
Lateral
Structure
Zero flow
Urban
MIKE 11
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
MOUSE
no
no
no
no
yes
MIKE 21
Rectangular
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
MIKE 21
FM
yes
yes
no
no
yes
Note that the number of links is not the total number of MIKE 21 cells/elements connected to the 1D models calculation points. To demonstrate, the
setup shown in Figure 2.1 has five links, although each link contains several MIKE 21 cells/elements. There are two links shown in Figure 2.2, one
for the left bank lateral flow and another for the right bank lateral flow.
Figure 2.3 has two links, one upstream of the road and the other downstream of the road.
The list of links may be re-ordered, augmented or reduced using the following tool buttons
Add a new link. The link will be augmented to the list.
Remove an existing link.
Move an existing link up the list.
Move an existing link down the list.
22
MIKE FLOOD
Definition
Please note that the 'insert' and 'delete' keys on the keyboard cannot be
used for inserting and deleting links in the overview.
3.1.5
Link Type
The link type defines the type of link:
z
Lateral
XFLOW=0
YFLOW=0
Urban
Coupling Type
The coupling type can be:
z
HD and AD
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
23
Application details
3.1.7
If using a lateral link, M11 river name is the MIKE 11 branch with the
link. US M11 chainage and DS M11 chainage define the upper and
lower extents of the lateral link, so all MIKE 11 calculation points
between the specified chainages will be linked to MIKE 21. Unlike the
standard links, no further adjustments need to be made to the MIKE 11
boundary definitions. Please note that the lateral link must span a reach
in the river which includes at least one grid point (typically a cross section).
Figure 3.4
24
MIKE FLOOD
Definition
3.1.8
3.1.9
MIKE 21 Coordinates
Figure 3.5
The list of cells used for a specific link (link number 1). The four buttons at the top are used in the same way as the ones described for
the link overview section
(3.1)
J 2 =J 1
K 2 =K 1
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
25
Application details
Figure 3.6
3.2
26
MIKE FLOOD
MIKE FLOOD
Figure 3.7
The graphical layout of MIKE FLOOD. Note the drop down list that
may be accessed by right clicking. The figure illustrates the use of a
rectangular grid version of MIKE 21.
Figure 3.8
The graphical layout of MIKE FLOOD. The figure illustrates the use
of a flexible mesh version of MIKE 21. The Block out river cells
does not apply to a flexible mesh.
User Manual
27
Application details
3.2.1
28
It is possible to pan in the graphical view. To do this click in the graphical view and either right click and select the pan option or use the shift
key in conjunction with the left mouse button.
The display properties for the graphical view are accessed through this
sub-menu.
Cells lying in the main river bed between the left and the right levee
may be blocked out. This may be done to ensure that mass is not double counted. Note this feature is only available for the rectangular grid
version of MIKE FLOOD.
Nodes in the urban set-up may be linked to the MIKE 21 grid cells/elements.
MIKE FLOOD
Figure 3.9
3.2.2
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
29
Application details
Figure 3.10
30
Files included in the set-up. The files from the coupled set-ups are
included by default. Additional bathymetry files, mesh files and
MIKE 11 or Urban files may be added.
MIKE FLOOD
Figure 3.11
3.2.3
The overlay manager controlling which graphical themes to be displayed as well as the order of the themes. The latter may be
changed through the use of the two arrow buttons in the upper right
hand corner.
Lateral links
Standard/structure links
The lateral link requires the user to supply the river branch name and the
topo-ID used along with the reach stations. The user also selects whether
the linkage should be along the centerline or the line made out by the left
and right levee. Based on the information entered by the user the tool automatically selects either
MIKE FLOOD
the MIKE 21 grid cells intersected by the left/right or centre line for the
rectangular grid version
or in the case of the flexible mesh the coordinates of the left and the
right end points of the cross sections.
User Manual
31
Application details
The standard/structure link only requires the user to specify the branch
name, the topo-ID and whether the link is to be applied at the upstream
(lowest chainage) or the downstream end (greatest chainage).
Once the links have been established the location of the links may be
inspected by stepping through the links in the cell table on the left
whereby the active cell/point is highlighted in the graphical view.
Figure 3.12
3.2.4
The link branch to MIKE 21 sub-menu. Note that for a lateral link
two chainages are required whereas for standard/structure links
only information on whether the link is to be applied to the upstream
or the downstream end of a branch is needed.
Add/Remove Images
This menu controls the images to be shown. The following files are possible to display
z
For each of the different files some of the display settings may be edited
by clicking the edit button found in the same row as the image file to be
edited.
32
MIKE FLOOD
Figure 3.13
3.2.5
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
33
Application details
The tool is applied to each river reach separately. The reach is selected
based on the river name, the topo-ID and the upstream/downstream chaniages. The cells lying within the left and right linkage lines are exported to
the file specified in the selection file field. Note that the selection file is a
.dfs2 file containing the 2D grid with a value of 1 in all selected fields.
Figure 3.14
Since MIKE FLOOD may be used with nested grids (provided a nested
MIKE 21 is available) the selection tool may export multiple files for the
same river reach i.e. a selection file for each grid in the MIKE 21 set-up.
To distinguish between these different selection files MIKE FLOOD
inserts the area number at the end of the file name e.g. if the file name
selection.dfs2 is chosen the actual selection files are named
selection_1.dfs2, selection_2.dfs2, etc. depending on the number of
nested grids in the MIKE 21 set-up.
34
MIKE FLOOD
Step by step procedure for blocking out cells in the river bed
1 In the MIKE FLOOD graphical view right click and select the Block
out river cells... option (see Figure 3.15).
Figure 3.15
2 In the dialog that appears select the river reach that the blockage is to
be applied to. Please ensure that the river name is typed correctly and
that the correct topo-ID is also supplied. If chainages are given which
are beyond the river reach the values are modified to coincide with the
reach ends. Also supply the name to be used for the selection file
including the .dfs2 extension (see Figure 3.16).
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
35
Application details
Figure 3.16
The dialog box for selecting which cells to block out in the MIKE 21
bathymetry.
3 Open the bathymetry file used in the MIKE 21 set-up. The file may be
accessed through the file -> open menu of MIKE Zero or through the
MIKE 21 interface by clicking the view button found in the bathymetry menu. The latter automatically opens the bathymetry file in the grid
editor.
4 With the bathymetry file as the active window in MIKE Zero it is possible to access the menu Tools -> Load Selection found in the main
menu bar of MIKE Zero. At this point you are prompted for the selection file. Browse for the selection file previously generated remembering that the file name has been augmented with a number indicating the
area number. The selected cells will by now be highlighted in the grid
editor.
5 Access the set value through the Tools menu of the main MIKE
Zero tool bar and provide the land value of the dfs2 file in the active
box (see Figure 3.17).
6 Save the bathymetry file under a different name to ensure that the original data is not overridden.
7 In the MIKE 21 editors bathymetry menu select the new edited
bathymetry.
8 Repeat the procedure for all rivers requiring blocking out of cells.
36
MIKE FLOOD
Figure 3.17
3.2.6
The set value dialog. Choose the appropriate land value for the dfs2
file.
Figure 3.18
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
The link node menu. The user can either link all manholes in the setup or a selection hereof by the use of either a node selection file or
through the drop down list of node IDs.
37
Application details
3.3
Figure 3.19
3.3.1
Overview of options for standard and structure links. Note that the
first column is carried over from the Definition page and cannot be
edited
Mom Fact
This is an abbreviation for Momentum Factor. The Momentum Factor is
applied to the momentum terms in MIKE 21 for standard links. A value of
1 means full momentum transfer through the link, while a value of 0
means that momentum transfer is not guaranteed.
Note that even if the factor is set to 0, the source term applied to the continuity equation still creates some momentum. While this is sufficient in
cases where conservation is not critical (such as over weir structures or for
very large 2D cell size relative to the river flow capacity), it will not be
accurate enough for all cases. On the other hand, in some instances model
stability may be improved by removing the momentum terms.
Momentum is disabled for the lateral links because of the conceptual difficulties associated with lateral flows in a 1D model.
For the structure links, momentum is preserved via the implicit terms and
this parameter is not applicable.
3.3.2
Ext Fact
This is an abbreviation for Extrapolation Factor. For standard links, the
extrapolation factor has a default value of 1.5. This factor controls the
time predictor in MIKE 11, which establishes MIKE 21 link values for the
next time step. If factor is set to zero, the same value at n+1 will be used as
38
MIKE FLOOD
at n. Note! If the last q point in the linked branch is a structure, this factor
is set to zero by the calculation kernel.
The extrapolation factor is not applied for lateral links or for structure
links. For more information, see the scientific documentation (7.1 Hydrodynamics - Standard Links (p. 65)).
3.3.3
To illustrate, consider a situation where a weir structure in MIKE 11 represents a road embankment in a MIKE 21 grid (similar to that shown in
Figure 2.3). The MIKE 11 structure flow would replace the MIKE 21 flow
conditions.
Next, consider the same situation except with a culvert located under a
section of the road. The culvert structure would be modelled in MIKE 11
(in a separate branch to the weir) and added to the flow conditions in the
MIKE 21 cells. As long as this culvert structure link is listed in the coupling file after the weir structure link, both weir and culvert flow would be
included in MIKE 21.
Consider a third possibility, where the road embankment is instead simulated as normal MIKE 21 cells. This is a reasonable practice (the upwinding facility automatically implemented in MIKE 21 has been shown to
simulate weir flow well). In this situation the weir structure in MIKE 11
would not be required, and the culvert structure flows would be added to
the MIKE 21 cells.
Note: the add / replace options mean that the order in which structure links
are listed in the couple file will affect the model behaviour. By specifying
Replace in a link, all previous link inflows from previous links will be
overridden. Also note that MIKE 11 can handle composite structures e.g. a
culvert and a weir at the same location. This may be used to handle a complex situation with flow both over topping and flowing under an embankment. The definition of such a structure is handled in MIKE 11 and does
not require two explicit couplings in the MIKE FLOOD interface.
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
39
Application details
3.3.4
Depth Adjustment
If depth adjustment is active, flow through a link is distributed into the
MIKE 21 cells according to the water depth in those MIKE 21 cells. This
is considered appropriate for links on natural terrain or channels, but may
not always be applicable for structures.
3.3.5
3.3.6
40
MIKE FLOOD
greater than the time lag caused by the smoothing factor. As an estimate
for the latter the following expression may be used
log f
T = t ------------------------log ( 1 )
(3.2)
where f = 0.001, is the smoothing factor and t is the model time step.
The estimate is based on the time it takes for an initial deviation in the
MIKE 11 and MIKE 21 water level to be reduced to within 0.1 % of each
other.
6) Rerun the model.
7) If a small value of the smoothing factor is required, you need to satisfy
yourself that the results are reasonable and the results for the overall
model have not been significantly delayed.
3.4
Figure 3.20
3.4.1
The overview for lateral links. Note that the link type is carried over
from the 'Definition' page and cannot be edited
Side of River
Side of river defines whether the lateral link is a link on the left bank or
the right bank of the river channel.
z
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
41
Application details
3.4.2
Method
The structure method defines the method by which flow is distributed
between MIKE 11 and MIKE 21:
z
The CELLTOCELL method performs a flow calculation for each individual point in the defined structure. Each calculated flow is then redistributed to MIKE 21 and MIKE 11. This means that the number of
MIKE 11 points doesnt necessarily have to match the number of
MIKE 21 cells.
The SIMPLE method performs a single calculation of flow, then distributes that flow to each MIKE 21 cell and/or MIKE 11 computation
(h) point.
The CelltoCell method is the default and is the only one available if linking with a flexible mesh.
3.4.3
Structure Type
The structure type defines the type of flow calculation to be performed:
z
The WEIR1 type is the default. See the Scientific Documentation for more
information.
3.4.4
Source
The structure source determines where the levee level geometry information comes from. Depending on whether a rectangular grid or a flexible
mesh is used the lateral links are treated slightly differently.
42
MIKE FLOOD
Rectangular Grid
z M11: Structure points are defined at each river computation (h) point.
The cross-section left or right bank markers (marker 1 or marker 3) are
extracted from the cross-section database and used as the link structure
bed levels. Bank levels at h points without a cross-section are interpolated.
z
M21: Structure points are defined at each MIKE21 cell. Bed levels
from MIKE21 cells are used as the structure bed levels.
HGH: Structure points are defined at either each MIKE 11 computational h point or each MIKE 21 cell, whichever has the highest resolution. The structure bed levels are the highest of the MIKE 11 bank
markers and the MIKE 21 cells.
M11: The levee height is determined from the bank markers in MIKE
11.
HGH: Takes the max of the MIKE 21 topography and the MIKE 11
bank markers.
Depth Tolerance
This parameter is used to smooth out the transition when the flow over the
lateral link changes direction. The parameter is also available for the
implicit structures. In this case the parameter is used to describe the water
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
43
Application details
level difference across the structure at which point the discharge gradients
are gradually suppressed. If such a suppression is not applied the model
may experience numerical instability. The suppression varies with the
water depth and is only active when the water level difference is less then
the depth tolerance.
3.4.6
Structure Coefficients
Coefficients controlling flow through the link structure include the weir
coefficient (default = 1.838 m1/2/s), the weir exponent coefficient (default
= 1.5), the Mannings n friction coefficient (m1/3/s) and the form loss coefficient. Note that friction can be included in the weir equations - see the
scientific documentation for more information.
3.4.7
External Files
If the structure source is EXT, an external file is specified. If the structure
type requires a QH table to be read, a qh external file is specified. The formats of both files are shown in Table 3.2 and Table 3.3.
Table 3.2
44
File Input
Example
Description
MIKE FLOOD
Table 3.3
File Input
Example
Description
// HQH file
53
MIKE FLOOD
The h-grid points within the linked river reach are identified.
The linked MIKE 21 cells are given a chainage based on the cell size.
That is the chainage runs from cell centre to cell centre plus additional
contributions from the first and the last cell. The MIKE 21 chainages
are subsequently normalised so that they span the lateral links chainage.
User Manual
45
Application details
The chainage of the structures are normalised so that the span the same
as the river chainage. The code uses the location based on these normalised chainages to locate which cells and h-points match up with
which lateral structure.
Flexible Mesh
MIKE FLOOD with a flexible mesh treats the lateral links in the following way
z
The h-grid points within the linked river reach are identified.
The linked MIKE 21 elements are given a chainages based on the segment chainage values. Each segment constitutes an internal lateral
structure modelled as a weir.
The ASCII file is exported in the first time step of the run. Once the
first time step of the simulation has been completed the file in step 2
will have been overridden with values describing the inverts of the lateral links.
Open a new cross section file (*.xns11) and import the MFLateral.txt
using File -> Import -> Import raw data.
The ASCII file has three entries for each lateral link given by:
M11 chainage, invert
M21 chainage, invert
Struck chainage, invert
46
MIKE FLOOD
The inverts of each of the links may now be investigated for possible
inconsistencies.
3.5
3.5.1
Type
There are four different types of links available.
z
Inlet method
The exchange of water may be described through 3 different methods:
z
Orifice equation: The flow between MOUSE and MIKE 21 is governed by a standard orifice equation.
Max flow
This parameters gives an upper limit on the discharge that can flow
through the urban link. If the exchange calculated from the flow equation
is above this value the discharge is reduced to this value.
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
47
Application details
3.5.4
Inlet area
The inlet area is only used when applying the orifice equation for describing the flow exchange between the urban and the 2D grid/mesh. The
greater the cross sectional area the greater the conveyance capacity of the
coupling. This parameter corresponds physically to the area of the manhole cover.
3.5.5
Crest width
The crest width is used when the flow exchange is described through a
weir equation. The weir crest should be typically be the circumference of
the manhole cover.
3.5.6
Scaling factor
Only applicable if the simple exponential expression is used to describe
the flow exchange. The scaling factor has a linear effect on the discharge.
Thus an increase in this value will generate a larger flow for a certain
water level difference in the urban and the MIKE 21 model.
3.5.7
Exponent factor
Only applicable if the simple exponential expression is used to describe
the flow exchange. An increase in the exponent factor has a strong impact
on the discharge. An increase in this value will generate a larger flow for a
certain water level difference in the urban and the MIKE 21 model.
48
MIKE FLOOD
4.1
4.2
The alignment of the 2D grid - this may depend upon the alignment of
main channels, flood plain features, etc.
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
49
exist in the 1D models. While the results of the simulation will not be correct, they may provide an indication of potential problems.
4.3
4.4
4.5
50
MIKE FLOOD
MIKE FLOOD
New files are added to the Result Viewer project by using Result
Viewer - Projects - Add files to project and press the new page icon
to the right. The File Type is a scroll-down menu, where the result
file is chosen.
The work area is defined under Result Viewer - Projects - Work Area.
In order to display the results together, the two models need to be based
on the same geo-reference. Thus, the MIKE 11 network must be
described in the same UTM metric grid as the MIKE 21 bathymetry
file.
User Manual
51
For Urban links MIKE View may be used to display dfs2 result files
superimposed on MOUSE results. Please refer to the MIKE View manual
for how to add dfs2 files in MIKE View.
Additionally there are the option of displaying grid based results in
Google Earth using the flooding plug-in. Though note that to use these
tools the grid results must be geo-referenced (i.e. not NON-UTM).
5.1
52
MIKE FLOOD
7 Another ActiveX window will prompt the user. Please select yes to
this query.
8 A final message box will appear once the images have been created
and loaded.
9 Once the file has been loaded and the corresponding images (overlays)
created the web viewer should look like figure Figure 5.1.
Figure 5.1
10 Various items may be displayed though note that the legend does not
graduate the values. Thus if a cell is flooded it will be activated in the
corresponding image.
11 To animate the inundation select a specific time step and click the start
button.
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
53
54
MIKE FLOOD
General Considerations
6.1
General Considerations
z
MIKE 11: The DELTA coefficient dampens high frequency oscillations from a MIKE11 simulation. The frequency of the dampened
oscillations depends upon the time step and the value of DELTA. Note
that the time step for a typical MIKE FLOOD application is relatively
small, which means that increasing DELTA is unlikely to have a significant effect upon the accuracy of model predictions. Therefore,
increasing the DELTA parameter is therefore a very useful feature for
eliminating minor wobbles and potential instabilities from a simulation. See the MIKE 11 Scientific Documentation for a more detailed
description.
MIKE 11
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
55
MIKE 21: The default value for land in a MIKE 21 bathymetry is 10. If
a flood plain model has bed elevations higher than this, ensure that the
bathymetry file has this specified.
MIKE 21: For applications with significant wetting and drying the
Smagorinsky eddy viscosity formulation should not be used. This
means that for the majority of MIKE FLOOD applications a constant
eddy viscosity formulation should be applied. For overland flow conditions it is unlikely that eddy viscosity will have a major effect on model
predictions (friction will dominate). However, for flow in and around
structures, the value of eddy viscosity can have a significant effect
upon predictions. Caution is advised in such cases.
56
MIKE FLOOD
General Considerations
When using the flexible mesh the code will locate the nearest mesh element face and apply the discharge exchange along this face. Therefore
it is beneficial to integrate the linkage lines into the mesh. The latter
may be done using the additional feature for exporting the linkage
lines.
The flexible mesh couples along lines in the model. The discharge is
distributed along these lines and it is therefore of outmost importance
that these coupling lines are completely contained within the mesh.
Ideally the lines should be integrated in the mesh.
The flooding, wetting and drying values should be decreased from the
default values. A reduction of a factor in the order of 50 is recommended.
The flexible mesh version of MIKE FLOOD uses an adaptive time step
for the overland flow (2D). Information is exchanged at every overall
time step controlled by MIKE 21. The 1D models use the time step
defined in the MIKE 21 set-up. Thus the time step should be selected
based on considerations of the 1D models MOUSE and MIKE 11.
MIKE FLOOD
MOUSE will automatically allow MIKE 21 to change the ground levels in manholes, if the change is within an acceptable limit. The limit
may be set in the DHIapp.ini file
(MM21_ALLOWEDGROUNDLEVELDIFFERENCE). It is in general recommended to ensure that manhole levels correspond to the
topography.
User Manual
57
6.2
Stability
z
The MIKE 11, MOUSE, MIKE URBAN and MIKE 21 manuals contain information on stability in numerical modelling. The comments
made are equally applicable for MIKE FLOOD.
The links Standard, Urban and Lateral are explicit. Meaning that time
step considerations become very important. The numerical design of
the links however means that the local Courant conditions inside the
linked cells / h points cannot exceed 1. The local Courant number is
defined as:
( v + gd )t
C R = -----------------------------x
(6.1)
where
v
= velocity,
= gravity,
= water depth,
= grid spacing.
MIKE 11
z
58
See the description above in Section 6.1 (MIKE 11) pertaining to use
of the DELTA coefficient in MIKE 11 to dampen potential instabilities.
In most cases, increasing DELTA (to say 0.85) will not adversely affect
model predictions.
MIKE FLOOD
Standard Links
6.3
For lateral links, try to make the structure resolution the same as or
finer than the MIKE 11 x and the MIKE 21 grid size.
Standard Links
MIKE FLOOD
Link points in MIKE21 can be dry initially, and can wet or dry during a
simulation.
User Manual
59
6.4
60
MIKE FLOOD computes the water level from the link point/area in
MIKE 21 and assigns it to the associated boundary point in MIKE 11.
If the MIKE 21 link consists of more points, the average value from
these points is transferred to MIKE 11. In general, more than one
linked MIKE 21 grid point will tend to smooth and stabilise a coupling.
Lateral Links
z
Lateral links can cause oscillations in the flow through the link when
the difference in water levels between MIKE 11 and MIKE 21 is similar. To minimize such oscillations, use the depth tolerance factor. Also,
consider using a friction coefficient in the links - it is considered physically correct in situations with vegetation on the river levees, and
improves link stability. A value of 0.1 meter is recommended for the
depth tolerance.
The WEIR1 and WEIR2H types are linked to the MIKE 11 structure
routines. They include drowned conditions and simulate lateral flows
accurately. The FORMLOSS method is straightforward. If these methods are not sufficiently detailed then an external QHTABLE type is
available. H is considered to be water level (either in MIKE11 or
MIKE21). Otherwise, QDTABLE uses (water level - structure depth).
Also, if a CELLTOCELL method is applied then Q is flow per unit
width.
MIKE FLOOD
Structure Links
6.5
Bed friction can be included in the weir calculation (see the Scientific
Background). While this is normally uncommon for in-channel structures, river bank overflow can often occur across reasonable distance
(the levee width) and through thick vegetation. Rather than estimating
a new weir coefficient to account for this, specification of a friction
term may be a desirable alternative. The length of the link used in this
calculation is determined from the MIKE 21 cell size for the rectangular grid version. For the flexible mesh version a weighted distance
from the river grid points and the individual linkage segments is used
for describing the length.
Lateral links can oscillate when the difference in water levels between
MIKE 11 and MIKE 21 is similar. To avoid this, use the Depth Tolerance factor. A value of 0.1 meter is recommended.
Using the highest (HGH) structure source type is usually the most convenient method. This picks the highest resolution of points (MIKE 21
cells or MIKE 11 h points), then assigns bed levels using the highest
values from the MIKE 21 cells and MIKE 11 points. If available, external input from a GIS could be used to extract more detailed bank line
information.
To view the lateral flows in the MIKE 11 results file, tick the Lateral
Links option in the Additional Output menu of the HD Parameter File
(.HD11).
Structure Links
MIKE FLOOD
The structure links are implicit. This means that a simulation that uses
these links will be more stable than the explicit links and simulations
can be performed using longer time steps.
In the structure links MIKE 11 lags one time step behind MIKE 21.
Thus, the displayed value of flow in the q point of the MIKE 11 branch
may not necessarily be the flow through the MIKE 21 cell. It is recommended that for structure links the MIKE 21 results be interrogated
rather than the MIKE 11 results.
User Manual
61
The MIKE 21 cells that define the inlet and outlet of the structure link
must be adjacent to each other. Thus if the inlet cell is (J1,K1) then the
outlet cell must satisfy at least one of the equations (6.2). However,
more than one MIKE 21 cell can be specified and a list of cells can be
in any direction or alignment.
K2 = K1 1
K2 = K1 + 1
J2 = J1 1
(6.2)
J2 = J1 + 1
6.6
62
The river branch that defines the structure link can only be a 3 point
branch (one h point at the inlet, one h point at the outlet, and one q
point connecting them). The q point can have as many parallel structures as are needed, or can have no structures (it can simply be a crosssection).
There is an option to add or replace momentum terms. If the momentum terms are replaced, the flow conditions calculated in MIKE 11
override flow conditions in the MIKE 21 cell. If the momentum terms
are added, the flow conditions calculated in MIKE 11 are added to the
flow conditions in the MIKE 21 cell.
With regard to activation depth, the idea is that for most flooding conditions there will be left bank flood plain flow, in-bank channel flow
and right bank flood plain flow. The interactions between these three
will be governed by the MIKE FLOOD links. However, water depths
could increase until the interactions between the separate flow paths
are no longer relevant. At this stage, a MIKE 21 simulation without the
MIKE FLOOD links would be more accurate. By using the activation
depth to switch on 2D flows across a river channel this could be done.
MIKE FLOOD
Urban links
6.7
Urban links
z
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
63
64
MIKE FLOOD
SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND
The scientific backgrounds of MIKE 11, MOUSE and MIKE 21 are also
applicable for MIKE FLOOD.
7.1
(7.1)
where
t
x
A
C
R
=
=
=
=
=
the time,
the length,
the cross-sectional area,
the Chezy resistance number, and
the hydraulic radius.
The gradient in water level is evaluated at the last Q point in MIKE 11.
The calculated time derivative of discharge is transferred to MIKE 21
together with the discharge at time n in order to predict the discharge at a
later time step (n+1/2).
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
65
Scientific background
The predictor assumes that the convective acceleration terms in the last
grid point in MIKE 11 are negligible. Furthermore, it assumes that normal bed resistance represented by a Chezy (or Manning number) controls
the flow. If a structure is present in the last Q grid point in MIKE 11 a link
to MIKE 21 the predictor is not used.
Flexible mesh
For the flexible mesh the standard link is designed is such a way that the
linkage line is mapped onto one or more element faces. Thus from MIKE
21s point of view the link functions as a boundary condition. In return
MIKE 21 transfers an average water level across the coupled element
faces which is then subsequently used in MIKE 11. It is required that the
whole of the coupling line is within the mesh to ensure that total discharge
is transferred from the river model to the overland mesh model.
The predictor is not used for the flexible mesh solution. I
7.2
66
MIKE FLOOD
Figure 7.1
The internal structures are defined so that all of the information available
in the structure geometry is utilised.
During computation, each internal structure is assigned a water level from
the river and from the overland solver. These values are found by interpolating levels at existing calculation points onto the internal structures.
Consider the schematic diagram in Figure 7.2 of an externally defined
structure, where the internal structure locations differ from the MIKE 21
cell locations and the MIKE 11 h point locations. As shown, water levels
are interpolated from the MIKE 21 cells and the MIKE 11 h points to the
specific internal structure locations.
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
67
Scientific background
Figure 7.2
Using the calculated width and bed level and interpolated water levels, the
flow across each internal structure is calculated using a standard structure
equation. These structure equations are the same equations used in MIKE
11. The flow from each internal structure is then distributed to / from the
MIKE 11 h points and MIKE 21 cells. This is done by determining the
range of influence that each internal structure has upon each linked MIKE
11 h point and MIKE 21 cell. As shown in Figure 7.3, if MIKE 11 h points
lie within the range of influence of a given internal structure, flow is distributed across those points according to water depths in each point. If no
MIKE 11 h points lie within the range of influence, flow is distributed to
the nearest upstream and downstream points using a distance dependent
interpolation. The same applies for MIKE 21 cells.
68
MIKE FLOOD
Figure 7.3
This approach allows a high level of flexibility when designing the lateral
link. However, it is likely that a similar distribution of MIKE 11 h points,
MIKE 21 cells and internal structures will produce the most accurate solution.
7.2.1
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
69
Scientific background
3 If cross sections are not present at the end points of the user defined
reach then extrapolated widths are determined from the existing cross
sections.
4 At all digitised points without a cross section the width is interpolated
from the existing cross sections.
5 The interpolated widths are placed so that they bisect the angle of the
two adjoining line segments.
6 The levee lines are thus made up by joining the respective left or right
end points of the combined interpolated widths and cross sections.
Figure 7.4
7.2.2
Center line
The only difference between the three is the construction of the line. The
center line is simply the digitised river from the MIKE 11 set-up. The left
and the right levee lines are constructed based on the cross sectional
widths.
70
MIKE FLOOD
When using the flexible mesh the individual elements to be coupled are
identified at run time. Thus the linkage is independent of the element size.
The linkage in this case is made up of the coordinates of the end points of
the line segments making up the linkage line. At run time the linkage line
is mapped unto the element faces.
7.3
Figure 7.5
The momentum equation from the MIKE 11 q point replaces the xmomentum and y-momentum equation of the upstream MIKE 21 cell.
This is the only thing that is modified within MIKE 21. Note that the cells
at the downstream end of the branch are only used to extract a water level
to be used when evaluating the momentum equation.
When the MIKE 11 momentum equation replaces the MIKE 21 momentum equation, the implicit terms for the momentum equation within the
MIKE 21 cell are replaced. Adjustments are made for link direction ()
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
71
Scientific background
and conversion from discharge (Q) to flux (q = Q/, = 2D cell size). For
the momentum equation in the x direction:
n+1
n+1
n+1
(7.2)
a M21 cos
a M21 = ---------------------
(7.3)
b M21 = b M11
(7.4)
c M21 cos
c M21 = ---------------------
(7.5)
d M21 cos
d M21 = ----------------------
(7.6)
If the terms are added (for example if the structure link represents a structure flowing under the existing MIKE 21 topography), further adjustments
are made to ensure consistency between the MIKE 11 and MIKE 21
terms. Again for the x direction:
n+1
n+1
n+1
(7.7)
(7.8)
b M21 = b M11
(7.9)
(7.10)
(7.11)
72
MIKE FLOOD
tions vary quite slowly relative to the time step, this is not a problem. It
may become a problem if rapid (and relevant) changes do occur over a
time step. Also, the displayed value of flow in the q point of the MIKE 11
branch may not necessarily be the flow through the MIKE 21 cell. It is
recommended that the MIKE 21 results are interrogated in this case rather
than the MIKE 11 results.
7.3.1
(7.12)
where is the smoothing factor, HM11 is the MIKE 11 water level, HM21
the MIKE 21 water level and n is the time step. By applying this expression n times the water level may be given as
n
n
(7.13)
i=0
Using the above expression a criteria for selection of the smoothing factor
may be obtained. Assuming that the water level in MIKE 21 in constant
then the number of time steps n it will take the MIKE 11 water level to be
within a fraction f of the MIKE 21 water level is given by
log f
n = ------------------------log ( 1 )
(7.14)
Thus the smoothing factor should be chosen in relation to the time scale at
which the dynamics change in the model.
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
73
Scientific background
7.4
n+1
n+1
(7.15)
(7.16)
b M21 = 1
(7.17)
7.5
Orifice equation
Weir equation
Exponential function
(7.18)
74
HU
HM21:
Am :
A I:
MIKE FLOOD
Advection-Dispersion
(7.19)
for |QUM21|< Qmax , where Wcrest is crest width to be used in the equation (.
If the surface is flooded then the weir is calculated as a submerged weir:
H U H ground
Q UM21 = ( H U H M21 )W crest 2g H U H M21 -------------------------------
H U H M21
(7.20)
The last function for computing the flow between MOUSE and MIKE 21
is given by:
Q UM21 = S ( H U H M21 )
Exp
(7.21)
Exp :
Note that eq. (7.21) the values of H are given in meters and the discharge
is given in m3/s.
There is an option to suppress oscillations by use of the QdH factor. The
value corresponds to the water level difference at which the suppression is
applied. The suppression is designed for cases where the pressure level in
the sewer system is close to the water level in MIKE 21 and may be
applied individually at each urban coupling. If a value of 0.0 is given then
no suppression is applied.
7.6
Advection-Dispersion
Concentrations of AD components are transferred explicitly between
MIKE 11 and MIKE 21 depending on the direction of the flow. For standard links with flow from MIKE 11 to MIKE 21, the concentration of the
AD-component is imposed as with a standard MIKE 21 source, i.e. as a
flux of mass into the MIKE 21points:
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
75
Scientific background
n+
V C M21
- = Q n + C nM11
-----------------------
(7.22)
When flow is going from MIKE 21 to MIKE 11, the modification to the
AD-equation in MIKE 21 is:
n+
V C M21
- = Q n + C nM21
-----------------------
(7.23)
The corresponding boundary condition in MIKE 11 can be either a transport boundary or a concentration boundary as usual. Furthermore, a mixing coefficient can be defined as normal.
For lateral links, the mass of the AD component being transferred is calculated from the lateral discharge and the concentration in MIKE 11 or
MIKE 21 (depending upon flow direction). This is then applied as a
source or sink term in the branches and cells. The source term into MIKE
21 is as for the standard links. For MIKE 11, the one dimensional advection dispersion equation is:
AC- QC
C
---------+ ------------ ----- AD ------- = AKC + C 2 q
t
x
x
x
(7.24)
7.7
(7.25)
where:
Q
A
C
76
=
=
=
Flow;
Area (= width depth = w h);
Chezy coefficient;
MIKE FLOOD
R
S
=
=
Q = whCh S
1.5
= h wCS
0.5
(7.26)
Thus, proportionality can be derived between flow and water depth (h):
Qh
1.5
(7.27)
Flow is then distributed across a number (n) of MIKE 21 cells. For each
cell (count i = 1...n), the distributed flow Qi is calculated from the total
flow QTOT:
1.5
hi
Q i = Q TOT ---------------n
(7.28)
1.5
hi
i=1
7.8
0.385
(7.29)
where w = width, C = weir coefficient (1.838 m1/2/s), k = exponential coefficient (1.5), h1 = depth of water above weir level upstream (Hus - Hw) and
h2 = depth of water above weir level downstream (Hds - Hw). This equation
is actually a free overflow term (wChk) combined with a scaling term for
submergence ([...]0.385) that approaches 0 as h1 approaches h2. The equation for the Weir Formula 2 (Honma) is:
Q = wCh 1 h 1
h
for ----2- 2 3 :
h1
h
3
Q = w --- 3Ch 2 h 1 h 2 for ----2- > 2 3 :
2
h1
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
(7.30)
77
Scientific background
The first equation is free overflow (identical to Formula 1 with free overflow), while the second is for submerged conditions.
Both equations are derived from the equation for form loss across a structure, where
2
v
h = -----2g
(7.31)
v
h = ( + F ) -----2g
(7.32)
where:
2
2gLn F = f -------------43
h1
f
L
n
=
=
=
(7.33)
Friction coefficient;
length of structure; and
Mannings number.
Expanding:
2g
Q = w -----------------h
h
( + F) 1
(7.34)
This equation is similar in form to Weir Formulae 1 and 2 for free overflow, except that the weir coefficient is replaced:
C =
78
2g
------------+F
(7.35)
MIKE FLOOD
Assuming that the entrance exit losses (are the same, a new weir coefficient Cf can be derived from the original coefficient C and the additional
friction:
C =
2g
2g
------ ; = -----2
C
Cf =
2g
------------- =
+F
(7.36)
2g
-------------------------2
2g C + F
(7.37)
So, the existing equations for weir flow calculations can be used, except
that the weir coefficient is modified according to:
Cf =
2g
------------------------------------------22gLn 2
2g C + f -------------43
h1
(7.38)
This equation is applied to the weir calculations in the lateral link specifications.
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
79
Scientific background
80
MIKE FLOOD
Standing Wave
EXAMPLES
The examples presented below are designed to test the operation of the
features of MIKE FLOOD and to demonstrate the use of these features.
Most are available with the DHI software in the Examples folder. Otherwise, check www.dhisoftware.com, where the input files can be downloaded.
Various MIKE ZERO tools can be used to view the results, including the
Result Viewer, MIKE VIEW (not in MIKE ZERO), Plot Composer, and
the time series, profile series and grid series editors.
A brief outline of the examples is provided:
8.1
Lateral Link 1: investigates lateral link flow over a bank of varying bed
levels and includes an AD component
Flood plain Flow: examines the transition from in-bank to flood plain
flow in a simplified setup
Floodplain Demonstration: demonstration of a real flood plain application. The example is available both for the rectangular case as well as
the flexible mesh version.
Standing Wave
Consider an 8 km long basin closed at both ends:
Figure 8.1
The width of the basin is 100 m and the mean water depth is 2.0 m. The
bed resistance is C = 50 m1/2/s. An initial disturbance of the water surface
is imposed corresponding to a sinusoidal variation of range 0.10 m.
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
81
Examples
Figure 8.2
The files required to setup and run this example are available. These files
take this example further than presented here, with tests using:
z
a MIKE 11 model of the entire test (no MIKE FLOOD link); and
Thus, four separate tests are included in this single MIKE FLOOD setup.
The results are shown as water level profiles at various time steps:
82
MIKE FLOOD
Lateral Link 1
Figure 8.3
8.2
Lateral Link 1
This is a test to assess the performance of the lateral links and to illustrate
their implementation. The test represents an inflow channel with over topping onto a broad flat basin (or flood plain), as shown:
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
83
Examples
Figure 8.4
84
MIKE FLOOD
Lateral Link 1
Figure 8.5
Lateral flow spilling out of the river channel into the basin will be distributed across the length of the branch, depending upon the bank levels, the
water level profile along the branch, and the flow distribution will vary
between the left and right sides of the river.
The MIKE FLOOD couple file is mf.couple. Run this simulation, then
inspect results using the Result Viewer in MIKE ZERO. Contours of water
depth and vectors of velocity at two instances in the simulation are shown
below:
Figure 8.6
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
85
Examples
There is a distinct difference in flow patterns between the left and right
basins. Using MIKE VIEW, look at the longitudinal profile of the
upstream branch:
Figure 8.7
Similarly, the lateral discharges can also be presented (tick the Lateral
Inflows button in the Additional Output Menu in HD Parameters):
Figure 8.8
Last (but not least), a check of the mass in the system can be made by
comparing the total discharge into the model (the upstream inflow from
the upstream branch) with the discharge out of the model (from the downstream branches):
As shown, 100 m3/s enters from upstream. The flows are distributed so
that 47.76 m3/s flows through the left branch and 52.24 m3/s through the
right.
86
MIKE FLOOD
Lateral Link 1
Figure 8.9
For comparison, the same setup has been done using MIKE 11. For the
MIKE 11 setup, the left and right basins are represented using branches.
Flow from the upstream branch to the basins occurs through two additional branches with cross-sections representing the bank levels. The
MIKE 11 test has been combined with the original MIKE FLOOD application (see mf2.couple):
Figure 8.10
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
87
Examples
The MIKE 11 test has two branches representing lateral flow aligned
equally at the centre of the upstream branch. Comparison of discharges
from the downstream branches for the MIKE FLOOD and MIKE 11 tests
are presented below:
Figure 8.11
Both the MIKE FLOOD and MIKE 11 simulations preserve mass, with
the amount of flow leaving the system exactly the same as the amount
entering. However, the MIKE FLOOD and MIKE 11 simulations each
give different distributions between the left and right banks. There are several possible reasons for this:
z
MIKE FLOOD accounts for the water level gradient in the channel.
This increases the accuracy of over bank flow calculations.
MIKE FLOOD calculates weir flow across each calculation point (20
in total), whereas the MIKE 11 simulation calculates weir flow at one
calculation point.
It is possible that additional losses from 2D effects (such as eddy formations) in MIKE 21 are contributing to the lateral link structure
losses. This may create a variation between a MIKE 11 prediction and
the MIKE FLOOD prediction.
The findings of this test show that the lateral links are mass preserving and
behave as expected. Further, the test highlights the importance of using
lateral links in situations where there is a significant water level gradient
in the in-bank river channel.
88
MIKE FLOOD
Lateral Link 1
Finally, an AD simulation is added to the test. To do this, add the AD computation to MIKE 11 and MIKE 21, then set the MIKE FLOOD Coupling
Type to be HD and AD.
The time series plot displays pollutant concentrations entering the
upstream boundary and flowing out the two downstream boundaries:
Figure 8.12
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
89
Examples
Figure 8.13
8.3
Lateral Link 2
This is a test to ensure that the structure equation in the lateral link is consistent with that in a standard MIKE 11 simulation. The first test is a simple MIKE FLOOD model that has a MIKE 11 branch linked to a MIKE 21
basin using a standard link:
Figure 8.14
90
MIKE FLOOD
Lateral Link 2
Figure 8.15
The initial water level and the downstream water level at the MIKE 21
boundary is 2 m (so water depth is 2 m in the upstream branch and in the
MIKE 21 grid). The simulations are performed using a time step of 30 s
(explicit Courant conditions). The upstream flow boundary in MIKE 11
gradually rises from 0 m3/s to 100 m3/s and remains steady at this flow
rate.
The resulting water level at the upstream end of the MIKE 11 branch and
the discharge at the downstream end are presented below:
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
91
Examples
Figure 8.16
Figure 8.17
92
MIKE FLOOD
Flow Direction
8.4
Figure 8.18
Figure 8.19
Flow Direction
This test was initially designed to test links applied in a direction that is
not aligned with the MIKE 21 grid. However, it evolved into a demonstration of all the link types available in MIKE FLOOD.
The test consists of a square MIKE 21 basin with a variety of MIKE 11
branches discharging flow into it. The branches are aligned at different
angles to the MIKE 21 grid, and consist of standard and lateral links. In
the centre of the basin is a lateral link that drains the basin. Using the zero
flow links, the bottom right corner has been isolated from the rest of the
basin, except for two structure links on each side. The structure links are
connected to 3 point MIKE 11 branches with a weir. Some of the link cells
in MIKE 21 are completely surrounded by wet cells. Others have land
cells, or alternatively zero flow links, inserted behind the link cells.
The MIKE 21 grid size is 10 m and the initial water level is 1 m. A constant discharge of 10 m3/s is applied to the upstream end of each branch,
and the time step in both MIKE 11 and MIKE 21 is 2 s.
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
93
Examples
Figure 8.20
94
MIKE FLOOD
Flow Direction
Figure 8.21
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
95
Examples
Figure 8.22
The flow directions from the links create a slight whirlpool pattern. The
zero flow links are also zero concentration links - the plot above demonstrates that the zero flow links are a barrier to advection and dispersion.
Finally, a check of mass conservation in the model is made. With 8 separate inflow branches the total flow rate into the system is 80 m3/s. The
resulting discharge through the draining lateral link in the centre of the
basin is shown below. At the completion of the simulation, the flow rate
shown in MIKE VIEW at the last point in the lateral flow branch is 77
m3/s. While this may appear to be a mass loss error, in fact it is a minor
presentation bug caused by having a lateral link at the last h point in the
branch. The discharge presented in MIKE VIEW is at the last q point. As
lateral flows are added to the h points, this means that the flow rate of 77
m3/s does not include an additional 3 m3/s entering the last h point.
To check this, rerun this simulation with the lateral link connected
between chainage 20 to 100 m on the MIKE 11 branch (branch9). The discharge at the last point will then be presented as 80 m3/s, indicating that
mass is preserved.
96
MIKE FLOOD
8.5
MIKE FLOOD
MIKE 11 - separate main channel and flood plain branches, interconnected by link channels (mf.couple)
User Manual
97
Examples
Figure 8.23
Figure 8.24
98
MIKE FLOOD
The total length is 10000 m. The river has a uniform slope of 1:1000 - the
bed of the main river channel upstream is 10 m, and the bed downstream
is 0 m.
To each of these setups, an upstream flow hydrograph is applied, which
has a peak discharge of 2000 m3/s. A downstream water depth of 4 m is
maintained.
Figure 8.25
The water level at the upstream end of each of the four models is presented:
Figure 8.26
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
99
Examples
Figure 8.27
For each test case the upstream water levels are reasonably consistent with
the other. However, the MIKE 21 simulation predicts a higher water level,
suggesting more losses along the length of the model. The downstream
discharges are also reasonably consistent, although again the MIKE 21
simulation (and to a lesser extent the MIKE FLOOD simulation) have a
reduced, more dampened discharge peak. This again suggests more losses
in the model.
A possible reason for this variation in model predictions between MIKE
11 and MIKE 21 could be due to wetting and drying in MIKE 21.
8.6
Floodplain Demonstration
This example is available as a demonstration model to illustrate a real
application of MIKE FLOOD. The application consists of a flood simulation through a river system. The area of interest is at a confluence with a
tributary, where a road embankment has been proposed. Culverts under
the road are located on each side of the river.
The river system is represented in MIKE 11. A MIKE 21 grid is inserted
into the broader MIKE 11 network to represent flood plain flow, as shown
in Figure 8.28:
100
MIKE FLOOD
Floodplain Demonstration
Figure 8.28
A 5 s time step is used in the simulation and the MIKE 21 grid size is 30
m. The model has been developed with the following MIKE FLOOD
links:
z
lateral links between the main river channel and floodplain and the
tributary and floodplain
zero flow links along the centre line of the river channel, to ensure that
water flows from one side of the floodplain to the other via the main
channel
similarly, zero flow links along the centre line of the tributary
zero flow links defining the road embankment (assuming that the road
does not over top)
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
101
Examples
Figure 8.29
The upstream discharge hydrographs for the river and tributary and the
downstream water level boundary condition (which is tidal), are shown
below:
Figure 8.30
Model results showing water surface contours and velocity vectors near
the peak of the flood event are presented in Figure 40. The time series
102
MIKE FLOOD
Floodplain Demonstration
plots in Figure 8.32 show water levels immediately upstream and downstream of the road embankment, and water level difference across the road
embankment. Also shown is discharge through the main river channel and
through each culvert.
The model results show that for this particular flood event there is a peak
0.36 m head drop across the road embankment. However, the peak head
drop at the peak of the flood is 0.16 m. Peak discharge through the main
river channel is 44.2 m3/s, which is much higher than the culvert flows of
(1.7 m3/s and 3.8 m3/s).
If this model was intended to investigate the hydraulic impacts of the road
embankment, a model of the existing situation (no road) could also be performed. Comparing model results with and without the road embankment
could give an indication of the likely impacts. Also, the performance of
the culverts could be assessed (maybe more are needed?).
Note that this is a demonstration model - not a real example. Other modelling considerations that could be of relevance in this example include:
z
The MIKE 21 grid does not cover the entire floodplain width.
The proposed road crosses over the main channel. Any hydraulic
effects (bridge structure or pier losses) created by this situation are
ignored.
The flood plain example is also available as a flexible mesh version. Note
that the flexible mesh version does not have zero-flow links available
since these may easily be accomplished through the use of internal closed
boundaries. The latter has also been done for the flood plain example to
model the road cutting through the flood plain.
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
103
Examples
104
Figure 8.31
Figure 8.32
MIKE FLOOD
Urban examples
8.7
Urban examples
Two urban examples are also included with the installation. The first of
these urban examples is based on an area in Bangkok and is a reduced
model from the full model. The present model represents a sub set of the
sewer network and further only couples the 2D and the 1D sewer model at
four locations (see Figure 8.33). Note that the example is available both as
a MOUSE version and a MIKE URBAN version. The set-up files are
located in the folder
DHI\MIKEZero\examples\MIKE_FLOOD\Urban
The example mimics a storm event that results in the sewer system being
surcharged causing inundation in the streets.
Figure 8.33
MIKE FLOOD
User Manual
105
Examples
106
MIKE FLOOD
INDEX
107
Index
Activation Depth . . . . . . . . .
Add/Remove Images . . . . . .
Add/Remove Layers . . . . . . .
Add/Replace Momentum Terms
Advection Dispersion . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
40
32
29
39
56
C
Coupling Type
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
D
Default Value for Land
DELTA parameter . .
Depth Adjustment . .
Depth Tolerance . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
55,
. .
. .
56
58
40
43
Result Viewer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
river name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
S
Scientific Background . . .
Side of River . . . . . . . . .
Smagorinsky Eddy Viscosity
Stability . . . . . . . . . . . .
Standard Links . . . . . . .
Standard/Structure Links .
Structure . . . . . . . . . . .
Structure Links . . . . . . .
. . .
. . .
. .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . .
. . . 65
. . . 41
. . . 56
. . . 58
. 15, 59
. . . 38
. 42, 44
. 16, 61
T
Tips and Troubleshooting . . . . . . . 55
E
Explicit Links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Ext Fact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
External Files . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Z
Zero Flow
. . . . . . . . . . . .18, 24, 62
G
Graphical View . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
H
Hydrodynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
L
Lateral Links . . . . . . 15, 24, 41, 59, 60
Link Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Linkage Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
M
MIKE 11 . . . . . . . .
MIKE 21 . . . . . . . .
MIKE 21 Area Number
MIKE 21 Coordinates
Model Layout . . . . .
Mom Fact . . . . . . .
. . .
. . .
. .
. . .
. . .
. . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
21
20
25
25
49
38
P
Pre and Post Processing
. . . . . . . 51
Q
QH table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
108
MIKE Flood