Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 194 views

    Tablante-Tungol Enterprises Vs Noriel

    Uploaded by

    Mavic Morales
    The petitioner company sought to cancel the union's registration due to their engagement in an illegal strike. However, the court ruled that an illegal strike is not valid grounds for cancellation. While strikes are legal, the phrase in question refers to activities like acting as a labor contractor or "cabo" system, not illegal strikes. If illegal strikes were meant to be included, it would have been expressly stated in the law.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Tablante-Tungol Enterprises Vs Noriel

    Uploaded by

    Mavic Morales
    194 views1 page
    The petitioner company sought to cancel the union's registration due to their engagement in an illegal strike. However, the court ruled that an illegal strike is not valid grounds for cancellation. While strikes are legal, the phrase in question refers to activities like acting as a labor contractor or "cabo" system, not illegal strikes. If illegal strikes were meant to be included, it would have been expressly stated in the law.

    Original Description:

    Labor Relations

    Original Title

    Tablante vs Tungol

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The petitioner company sought to cancel the union's registration due to their engagement in an illegal strike. However, the court ruled that an illegal strike is not valid grounds for cancellation. While strikes are legal, the phrase in question refers to activities like acting as a labor contractor or "cabo" system, not illegal strikes. If illegal strikes were meant to be included, it would have been expressly stated in the law.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    194 views1 page

    Tablante-Tungol Enterprises Vs Noriel

    Uploaded by

    Mavic Morales
    The petitioner company sought to cancel the union's registration due to their engagement in an illegal strike. However, the court ruled that an illegal strike is not valid grounds for cancellation. While strikes are legal, the phrase in question refers to activities like acting as a labor contractor or "cabo" system, not illegal strikes. If illegal strikes were meant to be included, it would have been expressly stated in the law.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    MORALES, MARIVIC A.

    Labor Law II Block A

    Case No. 88

    TABLANTE-TUNGOL ENTERPRISES vs NORIEL


    G.R. No. L-47848, August 23, 1978
    FACTS:
    Because the labor union had engaged in an illegal strike, the petitioner company in this case
    seeks for the cancellation of its registration, on the basis of the provision of the law which states
    that acting as a labor contractor or engaging in the "cabo" system, or otherwise engaging in any
    activity prohibited by law is a ground for the cancellation of union registration.
    ISSUE:
    Can the engagement of a labor union in an illegal strike be a valid ground for the cancellation of
    its union registration?
    RULING:
    No. The phrase engaging in any activity prohibited by law should not be interpreted or
    construed to include an illegal strike engaged into by any union. This is so because the phrase 'or
    otherwise engaging in any activity prohibited by law' should be construed to mean such activity
    engaged into by a union that partakes of the nature of a labor contractor or 'cabo' system. The law
    does not intend to include in the said phrase illegally declared strike simply because strike per se
    is legal. Also, if the law intends to include illegally declared strike, the same could have been
    expressly placed therein as had been previously done in Presidential Decree No. 823." Clearly,
    an awareness of the relevance of the maxims noscitur a sociis and ejusdem generis ought to have
    cautioned counsel for petitioner to shy away from this approach.

    You might also like