Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 203 views

    Daily Session Facilitator Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    ellen_rama
    This document contains an evaluation form for participants of a daily teacher training session. It collects information on the participant's key learning, how sessions could be improved, and ratings of session facilitators and program operations. Participants are asked to provide a username, indicate the learning areas and sessions being evaluated for the day, describe their significant learning and how they will apply it. They then rate multiple facets of each session presented and the facilitators on a scale of strongly disagree to strongly agree. Finally, they evaluate logistical aspects of the training venue, meals, accommodations, and program management and can leave comments for improvements.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Daily Session Facilitator Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    ellen_rama
    203 views2 pages
    This document contains an evaluation form for participants of a daily teacher training session. It collects information on the participant's key learning, how sessions could be improved, and ratings of session facilitators and program operations. Participants are asked to provide a username, indicate the learning areas and sessions being evaluated for the day, describe their significant learning and how they will apply it. They then rate multiple facets of each session presented and the facilitators on a scale of strongly disagree to strongly agree. Finally, they evaluate logistical aspects of the training venue, meals, accommodations, and program management and can leave comments for improvements.

    Original Title

    Daily Session Facilitator Evaluation.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains an evaluation form for participants of a daily teacher training session. It collects information on the participant's key learning, how sessions could be improved, and ratings of session facilitators and program operations. Participants are asked to provide a username, indicate the learning areas and sessions being evaluated for the day, describe their significant learning and how they will apply it. They then rate multiple facets of each session presented and the facilitators on a scale of strongly disagree to strongly agree. Finally, they evaluate logistical aspects of the training venue, meals, accommodations, and program management and can leave comments for improvements.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    203 views2 pages

    Daily Session Facilitator Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    ellen_rama
    This document contains an evaluation form for participants of a daily teacher training session. It collects information on the participant's key learning, how sessions could be improved, and ratings of session facilitators and program operations. Participants are asked to provide a username, indicate the learning areas and sessions being evaluated for the day, describe their significant learning and how they will apply it. They then rate multiple facets of each session presented and the facilitators on a scale of strongly disagree to strongly agree. Finally, they evaluate logistical aspects of the training venue, meals, accommodations, and program management and can leave comments for improvements.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Daily Session Facilitator Evaluation (INSET 2016) - North District II

    This form is to be answered by participants on a daily basis. ALL session for the day and all trainers/facilitators who
    conducted sessions for the day will be evaluated.

    NOTE: ALL items with Asterisk (*) mark are REQUIRED, thus it has to be answered

    USERNAME * (5 characters minimum) DATE :*


    Unique enough to identify you, but anonymous enough to keep your real name unknown
    Pls. check or underline

    Subject Learning Areas: DASHBOARD * Day to Be Rated:*[Day1]


    [Day2] ] [Day 3]

    I. SIGNIFICANT LEARNING

    What is your most significant learning for the day? *


    NOTE: Avoid writing down mere session titles.

    What will you do differently, given your learning? *

    II. EVALUATION OF SESSIONS AND FACILITATORS

    Learning Area (Session 1): DASHBOARD * Day to Be


    Rated:*[Day1] [Day2] ] [Day 3]

    Session 1: How can the session be improved, if at all?

    r
    Learning Area (Session 2): *

    Session 2: How can the session be improved, if at all?

    Learning Area (Session 3): * r

    Session 3: How can the session be improved, if at all?

    Learning Area (Session 4): * r

    Session 4: How can the session be improved, if at all?

    SESSIONS AND FACILITATORS RATING *


    1 Strongly Disagree 2 Disagree 3 Agree 4 Strongly Agree
    FACILITATORS

    Mrs. Ms. Mrs. MA.


    ADELINA JOSEFINA LILIBETH
    SUBJECT
    R. B. S.
    AREA
    CABAER PARADEL ESCALON
    COORDINAT
    O A A
    OR
    1. Session started on time
    2. Session ended on time
    3. Topic was relevant to our work
    4. Objectives of the session were achieved
    5. Activities were congruent to objectives
    6. Activities were appropriate for adult
    learners
    7. Participants were engaged in activities
    8. Learning materials were relevant
    9. Learning materials were adequate
    10. Learning materials were given on time
    11. Time allotment for the topic was
    adequate
    12. Facilitator exhibited mastery of the topic
    13. Facilitator expressed ideas clearly
    14. Facilitator asked stimulating questions
    15. Facilitator processed questions and
    responses to deepen learning
    16. Facilitator was sensitive to the
    participants mood
    17. Facilitator maintained positive learning
    environment
    18. Facilitator observed proper attire

    III. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS *

    1 Strongly Disagree 2 Disagree 3 Agree 4 Strongly


    Agree
    TRAINING VENUE 1 2 3 4
    Clean
    Equipment were serviceable
    Clean comfort rooms
    MEALS
    Satisfactorily quality
    Sufficient quantity
    Good Variety
    Generally healthy
    Served on time
    ACCOMMODATIONS
    With sufficient space
    Clean
    Clean comfort rooms
    Internet access is usable
    PROGRAM MANAGEMENT TEAM
    Available when needed
    Courteous
    Efficient
    Responsive to needs of participants
    Comments/suggestions for improvement of program management/operations*
    _______________________________________________________________________________________________
    _______________________________________________________________________________________________
    _______________________________________________________________________________________________

    You might also like