Ey Assurance Faas Connected Reporting
Ey Assurance Faas Connected Reporting
Ey Assurance Faas Connected Reporting
Connected reporting
Responding to complexity and
rising stakeholder demands
About the research
Our research surveyed 500 CFOs or heads of reporting of large organizations (with greater
than US$1b in revenue) to gain an understanding of the challenges facing them in the area
of corporate reporting. The research was conducted by Longitude Research on behalf of
the EY Global Financial Accounting Advisory Services (FAAS) group.
The respondents were divided between CFOs and group, divisional or regional controllers.
They were split evenly across Europe, Middle East, India and Africa (EMEIA), the Americas
and Asia-Pacific and Japan, and covered 16 main industry sectors.
The survey was supplemented by in-depth interviews with the following CFOs, heads of
reporting organizations and EY subject-matter professionals. These interviews add texture
and deeper insight.
We would like to thank everyone who contributed their insights and expertise to this report.
Foreword
Companies face an increasingly challenging reporting environment.
Globalization means that they have more complex operations
spanning different jurisdictions. The pace of regulatory change is
increasing, and investors and capital market participants have rising
demands. And, internally, the board and senior management are
requesting additional information. Three-quarters of respondents
say that the reporting environment has become more complex in
recent years.
Chart 1
Companies are operating in an increasingly complex environment
Legal active entities Jurisdictions or countries in which you do business Business units
14.2% 14.2%
18.0% 21.0%
3.2% 30.3%
10.4%
32.3% 17.7%
34.9% 34.5%
Systems used for reporting Reporting standards with which you must comply
9.0% 11.8%
16.4%
18.4% 11.0%
12.0%
05
610
1115
33.5% 1620
26.5%
35.1% 26.3% 20+
Greater business complexity is mirrored by greater reporting Increased business complexity inevitably complicates reporting.
complexity. Among our respondents, three-quarters have more than Wistron, a design manufacturer headquartered in Taiwan, has more
five reporting systems, and a similar number must comply with more than 70 legal entities globally. This poses considerable challenges
than five reporting standards. More than two-thirds have increased for moving to its target of one-day monthly closing. Its just the
the number of reports they issue over the past three years. fact that the nature of the business is so different in each country,
says Stone Shih, Chief Accounting Officer at Wistron Corporation.
Chart 2 We have to go through all the legal entities accounting statistics.
In the past three years, what change has there been to the following We discuss the target and the difficulties they will encounter, and
aspects of your business?
we have to try to solve them one by one. Sometimes, the system
can be an issue. So we also need to get the IT people involved
16 45 35 4 to understand the local accounting process and look for an IT
Number of legal
entities/business units solution.
20 46 28 6
At the same time, this increased complexity presents companies
Number of reports issued
with opportunities. With more data and information at their
disposal, they are better able to understand their business enabling
better insights, and can better align their internal reporting
No change Decrease
and management processes with what they report to external
Signicant increase Increase
stakeholders. This can strengthen decision-making, and provide
Signicant decrease
information that gives them a competitive edge. There are more
and much better ways to analyze information now than there have
ever been, says Karsten Fser, Global and EMEIA FAAS Markets
Leader at EY. The question is how you take all this information,
synthesize it and make it actionable.
Growing business complexity is coinciding with an increasingly Weve got tougher requirements set by the authorities on the one
complex reporting environment. Companies face more varied hand, and by the stakeholders on the other, says Mark Minne, Vice
demands than ever from external stakeholders. For example, they President of Reporting & Information Service (RISE) at Deutsche
must comply with a constant flow of regulatory and accounting Telekom. Weve also high pressure due to limited resources,
requirements. Three-quarters of respondents agree that the requirements regarding data quality, and last but not least,
reporting environment has become more complex in recent years. increasing compliance demands.
Chart 4
Which of the following topics or elements does your current reporting
Different stakeholders with different needs
cover today, and which do you expect it to cover in three years time? Almost 70% of respondents agree that it is very challenging to
satisfy the different needs of external stakeholders with corporate
reporting. For example, on the one hand, regulatory requirements
demand highly detailed reports with a very high degree of
data accuracy to fixed timetables. On the other, investors may
78 17 5
Regulatory nancial require much more accessible, short-format information on key
reporting
performance indicators (KPIs) on as frequent a basis as possible.
As both regulators and financial reporting standards require a
61 32 7 significant volume of data to be presented in financial statements,
Management and board
reporting it can often be difficult for shareholders or investors to identify
the information they require, argues Andrew Davies, UK&I FAAS
Leader at EY.
49 43 8
Forecasts
One of the big challenges is keeping financial reports relevant to
the users. If youre reporting lots of insignificant facts, you risk
58 32 10 people walking away, confused as to whats really going on with
Governance reporting the business, says one senior finance executive from a major
multinational. External stakeholders want simpler language in
reporting. They dont want as much accounting language being
63 30 7 used, and prefer to have things stated in more easily understood
Functional reporting
terms.
Investors also now often require much more specialized data that is
Today In three years' time Neither not necessarily found in a US GAAP standard or an IFRS standard.
The sophistication of end users, and their ability and desire to
try to differentiate between peer group companies, has changed
over time, says Kenneth Marshall, Americas FAAS Leader at EY.
This poses challenges in terms of collecting the information and The organizations 26 44 22 7 1
ensuring its accuracy. Companies may be used to applying high current reporting
standards to the regular financial data they report, but there is a framework is too complex
risk that additional information is treated with less rigor. I think
investors would like to see more formalized reporting of non- 25 51 17 61
External reports are too
financial information and how it relates to the financial statement. time-consuming to prepare
says Peter Wollmert, Global and EMEIA FAAS Leader at EY.
External stakeholders say 20 40 27 12 1
Irrespective of their specific needs, investors in general want that reports do not
information that gives them genuine insight into the opportunities contain enough of the
right information
and risks facing the business. Investors want to understand not
just where the company is, but where the company would like to 25 44 24 6 1
External stakeholders want
be, says Bukspan. They want more information about strategy. more frequent reports
They want to understand more about risks and not necessarily just
about the risks themselves, but about how they are being managed. It is very challenging to 25 43 24 7 1
These risks are not only financial risks, they could also include satisfy the needs of
operational risk, cyber security and others, none of which you different stakeholders with
external reporting
would expect to find in a financial report.
I believe we can introduce 29 48 18 41
Demands for frequency greater efciencies to our
reporting process
risks themselves, but about the books close. Wistron, for example, decided to implement one-
day monthly closing for their global operations. Shih explains that
how they are being this was driven by two factors. The first is external benchmarks.
Some of our competitors in Taiwan already had one-day closing
managed. These risks are not schedules. The second is the internal pressure. We were taking five
to ten days to finish the closing, and following that, we would have
only financial risks, they a review meeting with each business group. They were complaining
that, by the time wed finished reviewing, it was very close to the
could also include operational next month. And where a managerial response was needed, it was
too late. So we moved the closing and review meeting to as early as
risk, cyber security and possible.
others, none of which you However, shortening the cycle puts considerable pressure on the
would expect to find in a finance function. It condenses the reporting period into a much
shorter period, and gearing the entire machine to issue a report
financial report. on a particular day becomes very challenging when you have to
roll up information from multiple regions and divisions, and then
Neri Bukspan, Financial Reporting and Disclosure republish that information to investors in different parts of the
Leader, FAAS Americas, EY world, and include your management synthesis and analysis of that
information, says Bukspan.
There are important trade-offs to consider between speed and level At the same time, there are also internal demands on reporting.
of detail. If you want a very high level of granularity combined with In a more complex and volatile environment, managements need
high frequency information, then that would be very challenging for information, supported by analysis, on which to base their
to achieve, says Pellegrino. Its important to strike the right decision-making, is increasing. Three-quarters of respondents say
balance. Sometimes, we are too obsessed with the precision of that the management, board and audit committee require much
the information, because achieving this precision takes time and, more information and analysis of both financial and non-financial
by then, the information is arguably obsolete. If you gave me a information. Internal users are always requesting more detailed
choice between information that was 80% accurate today, or 100% information, down to the customer and project level, says Shih.
accurate in three months time, I can tell you that I would, in most
cases, take the information that is available today. This potentially presents opportunities for synergies. If investors
are interested in this, then in most cases, executive management
An emphasis on forward-looking information are going to be interested in it as well, notes Fser. This highlights
the importance of tying together your external and internal
The emphasis on non-financial reporting is also increasing.Nearly reporting processes into a continuum, and ensuring that it is built
three-quarters of respondents say that there is pressure on into the DNA of your organization. By thinking of this information
the finance function to provide more non-financial reporting in a similar way, you have a much more effective process to
information to internal and external stakeholders. This includes re-purpose information, whether its for internal consumption,
areas such as governance, CSR, remuneration and sustainability external consumption, your board, management, investors, risk
reporting that many companies now recognize to be highly committees or others.
important for their external image.
A forward-looking focus requires a much more granular level of
Investors are increasingly looking for more forward-looking, data. We dont just need to know how many products we are
actionable information, including information about strategy, selling. We also need to know how many customers we have
sustainability and how risks are being managed. External compared with last month, what their profiles are, how we acquired
stakeholders are constantly requesting forward-looking information them and so on, says Bossuyt. The granularity of the data that
about the business plan, says Jessica Chou, Chief Accounting we need in order to get to that synthetic layer that enables us to
Officer at the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company provide insightful, forward-looking information is exponentially
(TSMC). The financial reporting is important to our business higher.
because, not only is it the basis to earn stakeholders trust, but also
the best way to gauge the operating result against the business
plan and provide a basis for assessing the opportunity for further
improvement.
challenges. Over the past few years, weve had a huge rise in the
volume of accounting standards that has meant financial reporting
has become more complex, says Davies. Changes in financial 37.5%
instruments, share-based payments, pensions and other accounting Need for more training
standards, have all increased quite dramatically the number of
disclosures required.
33.9%
Need to invest in
more resources
33.1%
Need to adapt
business processes
31.3%
Need to adapt
data architecture
29.5%
Need to adapt
governance structures
27.3%
Need for more accurate
and consistent data
Over the past few years, weve
had a huge rise in the volume Need to add further
10%
The convergence of accounting standards in recent years has been Companies face major internal challenges
a huge benefit for multinational companies. The fact that theres
been a convergence of accounting standards has made life easier The biggest internal challenge is time to produce reports.
for us, says Cabal-Revilla. Before, we used to prepare financial Companies are clearly struggling to gather and analyze
reports based on Philippines reporting, US reporting, Hong Kong information, and report in a timely way. This is not only because of
GAAP and GAAP in Japan. So we used to prepare four different the sheer volume of information and the need to ensure accuracy
financial statements. and timeliness. It is also because of internal inefficiencies and
resource constraints. The complexity of the organizational structure
Moves by national regulators to impose new requirements is also a key barrier, as is managing the cost of a highly involved
independently would threaten this progress. If, at some point, a reporting process.
certain region decided to carve out a new standard, say on leasing,
then we will be moving away from global accounting and that The finance function will need to build new connections to
concerns us, says Schloemer. Youd likely then see other regions bring together the increasingly diverse information required for
of the world start to apply a local accounting philosophy for certain reporting. Its partly about connecting the right competencies
issues and that would set us back by 20 to 30 years. within the firm, says Wollmert. For example, if you would like to
include technical information, such as the volume of emissions,
Rather, companies would like to see regulation rationalized to then of course you need people from the relevant technical
improve efficiency. At present, requirements from different departments to help the financial people to measure these KPIs.
regulatory bodies, even at a national level, frequently lead to
repetition in reporting. However, companies are concerned that The downsizing of the finance function has added to the challenge.
removing this would risk non-compliance. Companies tend to It has made it particularly difficult to keep pace with changes in the
duplicate disclosures, says Prat Bhatt, Senior Vice President, regulatory environment. Even where CFOs have been able to keep
Corporate Controller & Chief Accounting Officer at Cisco Systems. the same level of resources, the expansion of reporting means they
must do far more within those constraints. This means it is vital
If you take a 10-K report [US annual financial report], there are a to search for efficiencies. Id like resources to increase. But, quite
number of opportunities for improvement duplication being one honestly, the pressures of the business mean we try to do what we
of them. Companies dont fully optimize the document because can with the resources that we have, says Cosgrove.
they are satisfying the requirements and expectations of two
different frameworks: the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) accounting disclosure rules which cover the footnotes
to the financial statements and the SEC rules that govern the
Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A). Those are not as
integrated as they could be, so companies often times dont want to
take the risk to remove that redundancy.
Chart 8 Chart 9
What do you consider to be the main internal challenges associated with What do you consider to be the main technology challenges associated
corporate reporting? with corporate reporting?
34.9%
Time to produce 43.3%
Lack of integration between
IT systems
27.5%
Complexity of your
organizational structure
27.1% 36.7%
Managing costs Number of reporting
systems
23.8%
Duplication of effort
33.7%
21.4% Lack of automation across
Too much information systems
19.8%
Need to manage differing
reporting deadlines 31.7%
19.4% Difculties accessing data
Errors introduced
by manual intervention
17.4%
Need for manual
29.5%
reconciliations
Inconsistency in data
15.6%
Inconsistency of
reporting requirements
15.6% 28.9%
Time required for review Poor quality data
12.4%
Flexibility
11.8% 21%
Risk of restatements Dated IT systems
8.2%
Lack of available resources
in reporting team
13.4%
8.0%
Difculties responding to Dated IT architecture
major strategic changes
3.2%
Lack of available skills
in the reporting team There are no technology 5%
There are no internal 3.0% challenges with
challenges with corporate reporting
corporate reporting
The lack of integration between systems is not the only technology Chart 10
challenge facing companies. Challenges also include the sheer Which of the following skills do you most need to improve your reporting
processes?
number of systems that many companies have in place and the
variances in data these can produce. We always have to invest
a lot of resources to keep our IT up to date, says Minne. We try 50.5%
to automate more and more of our information processes and Data/analytics
deliveries, and there is more and more IT as a basis for that. We
also have to bring in more staff who can work on the different IT
optimization projects in reporting. 42.9%
IT infrastructure
process, says Cosgrove. Each quarter, we sit down and say what
worked well and what could be better. Were not making dramatic
24 44 25 7
strides, but we are making incremental improvements each time Cost
we do things. Were using technology to help us. Were using
simplification to help us. We are doing a lot of benchmarking and
learning from others. 32 37 28 3
Level of compliance
Moves to improve efficiency sometimes involve the creation of
shared service centers that consolidate reporting. Deutsche
Telekom, for example, combined external reporting activity with 27 44 23 6
Efciency of production
an internal group and functional reporting within a single shared
service center. This was done especially to realize more efficiency
and synergy because we needed to reduce cost and also to align 26 39 25 9 1
external and internal reporting more closely, says Minne. Degree of integration
Despite a background of increased complexity and the awareness the risk is very high that, for certain reporting items, different data
that reporting could be more efficient, many companies have been sources are used, says Wollmert. This is not helpful at all. It only
slow to recognize the wider benefits of improving their reporting. makes things more complicated. You get more disciplined if you
Financial reporting is still often seen as a compliance issue, rather have one connected report that is organized in a very consistent
than a marketing or reputational issue, when it has the opportunity way and uses the same data sources.
to be all three, says Davies.
Respondents see considerable benefits in moving to a connected
However, a growing number of companies recognize not just that reporting model, with 97% believing there is some benefit to
they could be more efficient in their reporting, but also that better adopting this approach. For example, Badr Jafar, Chief Executive
reporting would have benefits for investor relations and decision- Officer of Crescent Enterprises, says: The main benefits
making. Even when companies are interested, though, they are from connected reporting include: bridging the gap with what
not necessarily devoting enough attention to this issue. I think stakeholders expect to be reported by providing a basis for us to
the percentage of companies that are trying to use reporting as explain our value-creation process more effectively; providing
strategic messaging rather than a compliance exercise is large, greater transparency on the resources utilized by our organization;
says Bukspan. They really want to do it, but they havent spent and enabling better communication with stakeholders on our long-
much time on it. term vision and strategy which in turn generates greater trust.
Better ability to link external 45.3% There are two main steps that companies need to take, says
drivers with strategy Chiang. First, processes have to be upgraded meaning the
and forecast
actual flow of the information, how it gets captured, how it gets
transformed, and how to push output deliverables. Second,
42.9% overlay the IT system, because you want to automate as much of
Better connectivity
with regulators the capturing, accumulation, transformation and generation as
possible.
40.7%
Better reputation for The investment required will be worthwhile. It will generate
your business
considerable efficiency savings over time, and will make the
company well-placed to respond effectively to future changes in
24.6% reporting requirements. There are solutions, but you need to get
Greater accountability
for reporting the money set aside within the company to invest in them, says
Chiang. And you want to get not just a minimally sufficient system
in place, but a good one that is sustainable for future needs not
2.6%
There are no benets just known needs, but also unanticipated needs. If you make the
right investment upfront, which is more sustainable from a 10-year
perspective, youre saving a lot of time, money and people-cost.
43.7%
Invest in IT infrastructure
greater trust.
Adopt Integrated reporting
(as dened by IIRC)
High-growth companies
We compared companies that have seen EBITDA growth of compliance, efficiency of production, degree of integration, and
greater than 10% over the past 12 months with other companies speed of closing than their slower-growing peers.
in the survey. Rapid growth forces high-growth companies to
focus on efficiency of reporting. But they still need to improve But they recognize that they need to do more. High-growth
further. companies say that their current framework is too complex and
time-consuming, and that they need to improve their efficiency
Higher growth brings greater complexity, both operationally levels further. The challenges for high-growth companies when
(increase in the number of legal entities or business units, they seek to improve reporting, center on data, analytics
jurisdictions, products and services sold), and in reporting and IT systems. They admit they need to improve their data
(number of reporting standards, reports issued, time taken for and analytics. And they perceive the challenges to be a lack
reporting). Faced with these challenges, high-growth companies of integration between IT systems, the number of reporting
have gone further on efficiency of reporting. They say they systems, and a lack of automation across systems.
are more effective in areas including timeliness, cost, level of
Chart 15
Infographics for high-growth companies versus others on effectiveness
of reporting and the need to improve efficiency
Timeliness
90%
80%
Condence of the board Cost
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
In line with EYs commitment to minimize its impact on the environment, this document
Asia-Pacific
has been printed on paper with a high recycled content.
Joon Arn Chiang
This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not intended to Financial Accounting Advisory Services (FAAS) Leader
be relied upon as accounting, tax or other professional advice. Please refer to your advisors for joon-arn.chiang@sg.ey.com
specific advice.
+65 6309 6997
The views of third parties set out in this publication are not necessarily the views of the global EY
organization or its member firms. Moreover, they should be seen in the context of the time they
were made. Japan
ey.com Tomohiro Miyagawa
Financial Accounting Advisory Services (FAAS) Leader
miyagawa-tmhr@shinnihon.or.jp
+81 3 3503 1166