IJEAS0301048
IJEAS0301048
IJEAS0301048
108 www.ijeas.org
Comparative study of OLR and HRT in different reactors and substrates for Biogas production
lowering of the substrate pH would lead to system failure. At Dr. Ch. Sasikala, Professor, Centre for Environment, Institute
pH 5.5 the fresh canning effluent can be introduced into the of Science & Technology, JNT University, Hyderabad, India.
digester without any neutralization process.
REFERENCES
IV. FED-BATCH REACTOR FOR ANAEROBIC [1] Mata-Alvarez J, Cecchi F, Llabres P and Pavan P, Anaerobic
DIGESTION OF VEGETABLE WASTES digestion of the Barcelona central food market organic wastes:
Experimental study, Bioresource Technology, 1992, 39: 39-48.
[2] Verrier D, Ray F and Florentz M, Two stage anaerobic digestion of
B. Velmurugan and R. Alwar Ramanujam, 2001 stated that solid vegetable wastes: bench scale studies, Proceedings of 3rd
using the Vegetable wastes like Banana stem, Cabbage and international symposium of anaerobic digestion, Boston, USA,1983.
Ladies finger can be anaerobically digested in a fed-batch [3] Ahring B K, Mladenovska Z, Iranpour R, and Westermann P, State of
the art and future perspectives of thermophilic anaerobic digestion,
laboratory scale reactor at mesophilic conditions ie., 35o C Water science and Technology, 2002, 45: 298-308.
Temperature. The OLR was maintained at 2.25 g/l.d with [4] Ali R, Tekin and Coskun Dalgic A, Biogas production from olive
HRT of 30 days. The average methane content in the biogas pomace, Resources, Conservation and recycling, 2000, 30: 301-313.
was 65% and the Methane yield was 0.387 l CH4/g VS added [5] Srilatha H R, Krishna N, Sudhakar Bada K and Madhukara K,
Fungal pretreatment of orange processimg waste by solid-state
for the selected types of wastes in a single stage fed-batch fermentation for improved production of methane, Process
anaerobic reactor for biogas production. The comparisons of Biochemistry, 1995; 30: 327-331.
the different substrates utilized for various reactors with [6] Kroyer GT (1995) Impact of food processing on the environment - An
influence of OLR and HRT with substrate pH is shown in overview. J. Food Sci. 28 547-552.
[7] O. Chavalparit, W.H. Rulkens, A.P.J. Mol, S. Khaodhair, Options for
Table1. environmental sustainability of the crude palm oil industry in
Thailand through enhancement of industrial ecosystems,
Table 1: Different substrate shows OLR, HRT and pH for Environment, Development and Sustainability, 8(2), 2006, 271-287.
different reactors [8] Knol W, Van der most M M and Dewart J, Biogas production by
anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes. A preliminary
study, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1978, 29: 822
830.
[9] Lettinga G,; Hulshoff Pol LW,; Zeeman, G. ; Field, J; Van Lier JB,;
Van Buuren J.C.L,; Janssen A.J.H and Lens P (1997) Anaerobic
treatment in sustainable environmental production concepts. Proc. 8th
Int. Conf. Anaerobic Digestion (Vol 1.) Sendai, Japan. 32-39.
[10] Thaniya Kaosol and Narumol Sohgrathok, "Influence of Hydraulic
Retention Time on Biogas Production from Frozen Seafood
Wastewater using Decanter Cake as Anaerobic Co-digestion
material" World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Environmental, Chemical, Ecological,
Geological and Geophysical Engineering Vol:6, No:5, 2012.
[11] W Trnovec and TJ Britz, Influence of organic loading rate and
* OLR studies of Thaniya Kaosol and Narumol Sohgrathok, hydraulic retention time on the efficiency of a UASB bioreactor
2012 for CSTR using seafood waste water is not treating a canning factory effluent,Water SA, Vol. 24 No. 2 April
1998.
demonstrated. [12] B. Velmurugan and R. Alwar Ramanujam, Anaerobic Digestion of
Vegetable Wastes for Biogas Production in a Fed-Batch Reactor,
V. CONCLUSION International Journal of Emerging Sciences, 1(3), 478-486,
September 2011.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to thank Mr. Johny Joseph, Sr.
Principal Scientist, BEEC, IICT, Tarnaka, Hyderabad, India.
109 www.ijeas.org