High Strength Steel
High Strength Steel
High Strength Steel
This article summarizes the current state of the art in the production and application of
TMCP high strength steel plates for steel structures. Using the thermomechanical rolling
process heavy steel plates with a yield strength of up to 500 MPa can be produced. These are
also characterized by best fabrication properties, therefore these products can be efficiently
used in big steel structures. For special elements high strength steel grades with a yield
strength up to 690 MPa (and now even to 1100 MPa) are sometimes used which are produced
by the quenching and tempering process. Typical application examples will be given.
Figure 1. Schematic temperature-time-procedures used in plate production: normalized (process A+B), quenched and
tempered (precess A+C) and different TMCP processes (D G)
By quenching and tempering high strength structural steels can reach a yield strength of up to
1,100 MPa. This heat treatment (process C in Figure 1) applied subsequent to hot rolling,
consists of an austenitisation, followed by quenching and finally tempering,
The aim of thermomechanical rolling (TM or TMCP) is to create an extremely fine grained
microstructure by a skilled combination of rolling steps at particular temperatures and a close
temperature control. The gain in strength obtained by the grain refinement allows to reduce
effectively the carbon and alloy content of the TM-steel compared to normalised steel of the
same grade. The improved weldability that results from the leaner steel composition is a major
advantage of high strength steel TM-plates.
Figure 2. Microstructure of conventional normalised steel (process B of Figure 1) compared to TMCP (process D),
TMCP+ACC (process F) and Q+T steel (process C).
Depending on the chemical composition, the required strength and toughness properties and
the plate thickness the rolling schedule is individually designed. Some typical TM-processes
are shown in Figure 1. Especially for thick plates an accelerated cooling after the final rolling
pass is beneficial for the achievement of the most suitable microstructure as it forces the
transformation of the elongated austenite grains before recrystallisation can happen. For very
thick plates and high strength steel grades a tempering process can be used after the
accelerated cooling.
TM-rolled plates with minimum yield strength values of 500 MPa were supplied up to 100 mm
for hydro-power, offshore platforms and special ships (Schutz & Schroter, 2005). Even higher
yield strength classes up to 690 MPa are feasible by the TM-process, however, in a more limited
thickness.
Figure 3 summarizes the historical development of high strength steel grades during the last
decades
Figure 3. Historical development of production processes for rolled steel products
Table 2. Mechanical properties of higher strength TMCP steel according to EN 10 025-4 (Part 2).
Table 3. Comparison of chemical compositions (according to the relevant standard and common production values for 50
mm plate thickness) between a normalized 5355J2G3 and a TMCP rolled 5355ML (Carbon equivalents: CE = C + Mn/6 +
(Cr + Mo + V)/5 (Ni+Cu)/15 ; Pcm = C +Si/30 + (Mn + Cu + Cr)/20 + Ni/60 + Mo/15 + V/10 + 513 ; CET = C + (Mn + Mo)/10
+ (Cr + Cu)/20 + Ni/40)
The table also indicates the values for the mostly used carbon equivalents, formulas which are
used to judge the influence of the alloying elements on weldability. It can be seen that TMCP
rolled steel shows much smaller carbon equivalents than normalized steel grades of the same
yield strength.
Furthermore, TMCP rolled steel has an excellent toughness behavior. Figure 4 illustrates that
the transition temperature between brittle and tough fracture behavior, which is often defined by
the temperature, where a Charpy-V impact energy of 27 J is attained, can be significantly
reduced by TMCP rolling in comparison to a conventional steel grade S355J2G3.
Thus, a reserve is given in order to ensure also outstanding toughness properties in the heat
affected zone of the weld. As an example Figure 5 shows the Charpy-V-temperature transition
curve of an S355ML measured in the heat affected zone in distance of 2 mm to the fusion line. It
can be seen that even at 50C a good toughness level can be reached resulting in a high
safety of the welded joint against brittle fracture. Furthermore, good toughness levels in the heat
affected zone are a prerequisite for the application of welding processes with high heat input.
Thus, also the efficiency of the welding process can be increased by using TMCP rolled
material.
Figure 4. Comparison of the Charpy-V-temperature transition curve for a conventional normalized steel S355J2G3 and a
TMCP rolled steel S355ML
Figure 5. Charpy-V-temperature transition curve in the heat affected zone of a S355ML after welding with submerged arc
welding (3,0 kJ/mm).
-
Due to the higher carbon content and the risk of hydrogen-induced cracking a conventional
S355J2G3 in thickness above 30 mm is normally preheated prior to welding. Due to its low
alloying content, TM-steel S355M is normally not preheated if EN 1011-2 is applied for the
calculation of preheating temperatures.
The economic benefit of avoiding preheating is clear: A time and money consuming step in the
fabrication process of steel structures can be avoided and the production efficiency of the
workshop be increased (Hever & Schrter 2003).
One big advantage of TMCP rolling technique is that even higher strength grades can be
produced by an appropriate heat treatment without considerably increasing the alloying content.
Thus Figure 6 shows the mechanical properties of two steel plates of the same chemical
compositions but with different treatments after rolling. By applying an especially harsh cooling
the so-called heavy accelerated cooling the yield and ultimate strength of the steel plates
can be increased without any change of the chemical composition.
Figure 6. Tensile strength and yield strength of two TMCP rolled steel plates with the same chemical compositions but with
different cooling speed after rolling.
Thus, even a steel with a minimum yield strength of 460 MPa can be produced with acceptable
carbon equivalents for best weldability. For instance, an S460M steel shows a carbon equivalent
of 0.40 0.42 % which may be lower than that for a conventional S355J2G3.
Figure 7. Comparison of preheating temperatures according to EN 1011 between normalized steel S460N and higher
strength steel S460M
Figure 8. Charpy-V temperature transition curves for an S500M steel without cold forming, with additional cold forming and
cold forming with additional artificial ageing.
Further fabrication properties of TMCP-rolled steel can be found in Hanus & Hubo (1999) and
Schroter (2004).
Figure 10, Influence of increasing tempering temperatures on the Charpy impact temperature transition of S890QL steel.
The tempering conditions must be adapted to the particular chemical composition of the steel.
The higher the toughness and strength requirements the closer gets the permitted range for the
tempering conditions.
It has already been mentioned that the alloying compositions of quenched and tempered steel
increases with growing plate thickness in order to ensure a sufficient hardening of the plate in
the core region. Therefore, it is obvious that the carbon equivalent of a quenched and tempered
steel increases with the plate thickness. An example is given by Table 4.
Figure 11. Hardness in the coarse grained HAZ as a function of weld cooling time (t815) for some structural steels in the as
welded condition.
To achieve satisfactory weld metal properties the welding parameters must be limited with
increasing yield strength. Acceptable properties for an S690 steel are normally obtained with
cooling times between 6 s and 20 s. For lower cooling times the hardness of the heat affected
zone may exceed limiting values with the risk of introducing cracks, see Figure 11. On the other
hand, long cooling times result in poor strength and toughness values.
The window between upper and lower admissible cooling times gets the smaller the higher the
basic yield strength of the steel is. This is related to a narrowing of the window of welding
parameters, from which heat input and preheating temperature can be chosen. Figure 12
demonstrates that this parameter window also depends on other factors. The hydrogen content
of the consumables H2 [measured in m1/100 g] has a significant influence on the preheating
temperature. In order to reduce the risk of hydrogen-induced cracking the preheating tempera-
ture increases with growing hydrogen content. According to EN 1011 the necessary preheating
temperature Tp [in C] under the condition of normal constraint conditions also depends on the
heat input Q [in kEmm], the carbon equivalent CET and the plate thickness d [in min]:
Figure 12.: Weld parameter box for S690Q, 20 mm thick.
FATIGUE RESISTANCE
The fatigue resistance of welded structures limits the use of higher strength steel in dynamically
loaded constructions. It is understood that the fatigue resistance of welded details performed
under normal conditions is more or less the same for normal mild steel and for higher strength
grades. Thus it can happen that the designer of steel structures cannot profit from the higher
static strength of high strength grades if the construction is dynamically loaded.
On the other hand it is also known that the fatigue resistance of high strength steel can be
improved by reducing the notch effect of the weld details. Apart form special precautions to
perform high weld quality, this can be reached by special post-treatments of the weld.
In general these post-weld treatments are processes which reduce the notch effect of the weld
details, such as the TIG dressing or a grinding of the weld. For instance the TIG dressing
smoothes the weld notch by a further remelting of the transition zone between weld and base
material.
But post treatments, such as shoot peening and hammering, exist which introduce compression
stresses in the transition zone between weld and base material. By these processes the
transition zone is plastically deformed inducing compression stresses. Also smaller defects in
the weld are removed. However, these processes are rarely used in steel construction due to
high vibrations, noise and also poor reproducibility.
The ultrasonic impact treatment (UIT) represents a relatively new post-treatment which does not
show these disadvantages (Statnikov, 1975), Here, an ultrasonic transformer transforms
ultrasonic waves into mechanical impulses. Thereby, the weld is hammered by hardened bolts
with a frequency of 200 Hz and at the same time ultrasonic energy of 27 55 kHz is introduced.
This process is now under close investigation in a German research project (Kuhlmann, Durr &
Schroter). Figures 13 and 14 show some selected results of the fatigue test performed in this
study for various post treatments of the weld. Here the fatigue resistance dot defined at a level
where 50 % of the specimens are assumed to have failed under a constant cyclic load after 2
million load cycles is given. The R-value (ratio between lowest and highest) load is fixed at 0,1.
The tests have been performed on small scale specimens simulating a transverse stiffener,
Although the number of tests given in these charts is very limited, it can be clearly seen, that the
fatigue resistance can be improved by the different post treatment. The best results are
obtained by the UIT treatment.
These results give the hope that the efficiency of dynamically loaded steel structures can be
improved. It should be taken into account that the number of details for which the fatigue
resistance is the determining factor in the design process, can be very small. Therefore, the
improvement of the fatigue behavior in such local areas can increase significantly the efficiency
of higher strength steel in the entire structure.
A typical example for the application of S690Q steel in medium span bridges in Germany is dis-
played in Figure 18. Here a composite bridge across the freight railroad centre in Ingolstadt with
span lengths of 24 + 3*30 + 24 in is shown. The cross section consists of two 1.2 m-high plated
girders in a distance of 7 m, cross beams in a distance of 7.50 in and a cantilevered concrete
deck cast in-situ in a rhythm of 15 m. Here S690Q was applied for the connection between the
girder and the piers formed by concrete filled steel tubes of 600 mm diameter. The 70 mm-thick
lamella of S690 was welded to the girder to form a bending-stiff connection. Thus, a very
efficient alternative for bearings was created.
Figure 18. Pier and pier-girder connection of a bridge near Ingolstadt,
However, the real domain of high strength steel grades such as S460M is still the construction
of bigger bridges such as the new Rhine-bridge in the north of Dlisseldorf (Germany), which was
opened for traffic middle of 2002 (Sedlacek, Eisel, Paschen & Feldmann, 2002). For this cable-
stayed bridge with a central span length of 275 m the pylons had to be restricted to a height of
34 m due to their situation in the landing zone of the near airport, see Figure 19. Therefore, the
high forces arising in the pylon heads could only be solved by selecting the high strength steel
S460ML for these structural elements. Even plate thicknesses up to 100 mm have been used
for the central parts of the pylon heads.
Figure 19. The Ilverich Bridge in Dtisseldorf-North (Germany)
The most impressive example for the use of higher strength grades in bridge building is shown
by Figure 20. The Millau Viaduct in the South of France, which was opened end of 2004, is the
highest bridge in the world by a total height of 343 m, a deck height of up to 270 m and a length
of 2,460 m. The total weight of steel plates used for this extraordinary bridge is 43,000 t, among
this 18,000 t of 5460M. Apart from the pylons this steel grade was used for wider parts of the
box girder in particular to reduce the weight during the incremental launching process and to
optimize the thickness of welded elements for efficient and quick construction.
An example for the application of higher strength steel grades in building structures is shown in
Figure 21. The structure shown there forms a part of the Sony-Center in Berlin. This truss
structure is fixed on three columns and holds the lower apartment building which hangs above
the facade of an ancient hotel. The truss girders consist of welded box sections made of S460 in
thickness up to 110 mm. Due to the high stresses the nods between flanges and diagonals are
built of lamella packages made of S690.