Tempcore Process
Tempcore Process
The strength together with ductility, weldability and formability are the most essential
quality requirements of rebars. Thus, yield strength, together with tensile strength, is
the first requirement for reinforcement steel in standards and the grade of steel is
classified according to the specified minimum yield strength. Use of the higher-grade
steel rebars is economical since less steel is needed for the same loading condition,
and the total cost is reduced. When the guaranteed yield strength of the rebars is
increased, the weight of rebars to be used for a given civil construction is reduced and,
consequently, the reinforcing costs are cut down. This reduction in quantity also
reduces the cost in transporting, handling, and fixing of the bars during the civil
construction.
Earlier, the design of a concrete construction was based on a stress concept, i.e., on the
assumption that the loads which normally appear in service induce only elastic
stresses in the reinforcement steel. In such a case, the safety of a construction can be
defined in terms of a stress ratio, e.g., the ratio between the service stress and the yield
stress of the rebar (Fig 1a). However, recent studies have led to the conclusion that a
stress-based calculation of the reinforced concrete is not sufficient because, in some
cases, local plastic deformations of a given extent have to be absorbed without failure
of the rebars (for instance, when tamping occurs). In such cases, the safety of a
concrete construction is expressed in terms of a strain ratio, e.g., the ratio between the
local plastic deformation which can occur and the uniform elongation of the rebar (Fig
1b). Such a way of design is now adopted in many countries, and it requires ductile
rebars and a guaranteed uniform elongation of up to 4 % is prescribed for as received
rebars and for welded rebars.
Fig 1 Safety concepts for the use of rebars during construction
Another important aspect for the safety of concrete constructions is to prevent the loss
of ductility after rebending. This again emphasizes the necessity of a good rebending
ability. Additionally, the use of high yield strength steel rebars can also permit a
reduction in the width of major girders or the size of columns in high-rise buildings,
thus it can reduce the cost of concrete and handling. Adequate ductility is needed
during the fabrication for safety considerations. This is particularly important for
structures where the possibility of earthquakes is part of the design consideration.
From the fabrication point of view, where bending and rebending of rebars are taking
place, good ductility is very important. The concern regarding ductility is reflected in
all the standards, and normally the minimum diameter of the mandrel for 180 degrees
bend and the total elongation are generally specified.
Other requirements include fatigue resistance, high and low temperature properties,
impact properties, corrosion resistance, but these are generally not specified by
various national standards although the concern is increasing.
Hence, it can be seen that from the requirements of the rebars and from the users
point of view, the important properties which the rebars is required to have are (i)
high yield strength, (ii) good weldability, (iii) good bendability and rebendability, and
(iv) ductility.
There are several conventional processes which can be used for the production of high
strength weldable rebars. These methods can be classified into two distinct categories
(Fig 2) as given below.
Rebars can be used in as-rolled condition after slow cooling in air. For the production
of these rebars, the yield strength is increased by modifying the chemical composition
but the carbon and manganese contents are to be kept low in order to avoid a
significant decrease in weldability. This is done by micro-alloyirig, i.e. by adding
appropriate quantities of micro-alloying elements such as niobium or vanadium.
Rebars can be produced by putting the rebars to a strain hardening after hot rolling,
for instance by cold deformation. For such bars, the yield strength can be increased by
increasing the extent of strain hardening. This method enables the production of high
strength weldable rebars from low carbon and manganese steels. Example of such
rebars is cold twisted deformed rebars popularly known as CTD rebars.
Fig 2 Processes used for production of high strength weldable rebars
Tempcore process
In the rolling mill producing rebars, steel billets are heated to around 1150 deg C in
reheating furnace and rolled through a sequence of rolling strands which
progressively reduce the billets to the final size and shape of reinforcement bars. On
leaving the last strand, a controlled cooling is applied in such a way that the bar
undergoes three stage metallurgical transformations as it is shown by a typical
continuous cooling transformation (CCT) diagram at Fig 3. As shown in CCT diagram,
the Tempcore process is dependent on temperature and time.
Fig 3 Tempcore process on a CCT diagram
An important feature of the Tempcore process is its great versatility. The properties of
the rebar for a given diameter and steel composition, can be varied to a large extent by
correctly choosing the duration of the first stage (cooling time) and the water flow in
the quenching installation (intensity of cooling). Properly applied, the process allows
an increase of the yield strength of 150 MPa to 230 MPa without a prohibitive and
significant decrease in ductility. High strength (weldable) grades and gain in steel
strength is achieved in the Tempcore steel rebars without any addition of the alloying
elements.
Tempcore process is able to produce high strength weldable steel rebars with low
carbon and low manganese contents without any addition of costly micro-alloying
elements such as vanadium or niobium. Since the same billet composition can be used
for different steel grades and diameters, a significant rationalization can be done in the
plant. The water quenching and self tempering treatment is applied directly in line
after the finishing stand without any reduction of rolling speed or loss of productivity.
By a judicious combination of Tempcore treatment and micro-alloying chemistry, new
higher grades (yield strength higher than 700 MPa and tensile strength higher than
800 MPa) can be produced, especially for large diameter rebars (upto 75 mm).
The Tempcore process for the production of rebars has three stages. These stages of
the Tempcore process are (i) quenching of the surface layer, (ii) self-tempering of the
martensite, and (iii) transformation of the core. The process, properly applied, leads to
an increase of the yield strength of rebars and this increase depends on the cooling
intensity. Schematics of the process are shown in Fig 3.
In the first stage, the rebar leaving the last stand of the hot rolling mill passes through
a special water-cooling section. The cooling efficiency of this installation is such that
the surface layer of the rebar is quenched into martensite while the core remaining
austenitic. The quenching treatment is stopped when a determined thickness of
martensite has been formed under the skin (outer part of the rebar section dropping
below the martensite transformation starting temperature MS).
In the second stage, the rebar leaves the intense cooling section, and a temperature
gradient is established in its cross section which causes heat to release from the
Centre to the surface. This increasing of the surface layer temperature results in the
self-tempering of the martensite. The name Tempcore has been chosen to illustrate
the fact that the martensitic layer is TEMPered by the heat left in the CORE at the end
of the quenching stage.
Finally, in the third stage, during the slow cooling of the rebar on the cooling bed, the
austenitic core transforms into ferrite and pearlite or into bainite, ferrite and pearlite.
Hence, a Tempcore steel rebar is essentially a composite material consisting of
concentrically disposed hard outer layer and soft core with an intermediate layer
which is intermediately hardened. With relatively low carbon content, Tempcore steel
rebars provides high strength, excellent ductility and weldability amongst other
advantages.
Fig 4 Schematics of the Tempcore process for rebar production
There are two process models which have been developed for Tempcore process by
CRM (Fig 5). Both are continuously being used and improved upon with the
commissioning results of the new installations. The first model is used for the design
of installations. It computes the quenching time necessary to obtain the grade to
produce minimum yield strength (i.e. yield strength + safety margin) from (i) the rebar
data (diameter, finishing temperature), (ii) by selection of the internal diameter of
cooling nozzles, and (iii) the specific water flow rate. The second model links the
mechanical properties to the chemical composition of the steel and with rebar
diameter.
The optimization of each new Tempcore installation, takes into account the mill
constraints, the rebar straightness, and the controllability of the process, and a best
compromise is achieved between (i) overall length of the equipment, (ii) total cooling
water flow rate (at nominal pressure of 1.2 MPa), and (iii) number of ranges of cooling
nozzles required to cover the whole range of rebars diameters.
Fig 5 Models for the design of the Tempcore installation
Another important point is to reduce the time and manpower needed during changes
in diameter or to produce non Tempcore products. When the available space is
sufficient, a laterally movable water collecting box is chosen. For long cooling line, a
segmentation in two or three water boxes (each individually laterally movable) is also
possible as has been done in a recent installation for a large diameter (upto 75 mm)
rebar. It is the longest Tempcore installation of 54 m length (3 sections of 18 m each).
It is equipped with remote on/off valve on each cooling nozzle. When the available
space (width, pass line level) is the main constraint, the water collecting box can be
fixed with one range of cooling nozzles.
Tempcore installation can also be designed with 4 parallel cooling lines for slit-rolling
of 8 mm to 12 mm diameter rebars. This line has a compact water collecting box,
equipped on each strand with individual control of cooling length and water flow rate.
Some other specific features are also used such as the protection of the not used
cooling nozzles against overheating (mainly at entry of the cooling line) by external
full cone nozzles, or by means of water jackets along the downstream cooling pipes
with water going by two full cone nozzles to cool the injector. An anti-sucking device is
used in front of cooling nozzle (for rebar diameters from 25 mm) to prevent sucking of
air by the nozzles and to avoid the corresponding decrease in the cooling efficiency at
the front end of the billets.
The pyrometers are the heart of the control of the process. The location of the
tempering pyrometer is of prime importance to get measurements as close as possible
to the maximum recovery temperature (maximum reached by the surface). The
pyrometer located at the entry of the Tempcore box is also important to measure the
variation of finishing temperature along the billet or between successive billets. A
variation of 50 deg C of the finishing temperature corresponds to a variation of around
8 % of the cooling length at equal specific water flow rate, and thus to variation of the
tensile properties after treatment.
The two easy to adjust and powerful control variables in the Tempcore process are
water flow rate and the quenching time (Fig 6). The control of the cooling power of a
Tempcore line is performed in two steps. In the first step (main control), the length of
the quenching line (i.e. the number of nozzles in use) is adjusted. In order to perform
an efficient control and to maintain a good homogeneity of the cooling, the nozzles to
be switched off are the upstream ones. In the second step (fine tuning), the water flow
rate is adjusted by acting on the main modulating valve.
Fig 6 On-line control of the Tempcore process
The cooling length and quenching time are linked by the rolling speed at the finishing
stand. This speed is required to be maintained constant along the billet during its
crossing of the quenching equipment, and more particularly when the tail of the billet
is leaving the finishing stand. That is assumed by the pinch-roll located between the
exit of the Tempcore box and the dividing shear. Without using this pinch-roll, when
the tail leaves the finishing stand, small rebar diameters are decelerated by the water
while the largest diameters are accelerated.
For a given diameter, the input parameters (cooling length, water flow rate, finishing
temperature, and chemical composition of the steel) have influence on the output
parameter of the process (tempering temperature, yield strength, tensile strength, and
TS/YS ratio). This influence is shown in Fig 7.
Fig 7 Influence of the input parameters on the output parameters
To obtain a homogenous treatment, the intensity of the cooling (given by the water
flow rate per meter of line) is to be high enough to obtain a complete and regular
martensite outer ring, constant along the length of the billet. The good straightness of
the rebars is obtained with homogenous Tempcore treatment. If the martensite ring is
open, wavy bars are observed on the cooling bed. Some of the important points which
are not to be done for the proper use of the Tempcore installation are given below.
When rebars of too small diameter are treated through too large cooling nozzle, then the filling coefficient F is very
low. This leads to an open martensite ring. This phenomenon is also observed when the cooling nozzles have an
When using of the full cooling length available with low water flow rate per meter then the cooling intensity is too
low.
The previous method is more striking when the designed cooling length is more than twice the necessary one.
Using an active cooling nozzle always at the entry of the cooling line followed by some close cooling nozzles and
finally a given active cooling length upto the stripper is helpful. Then the cooling rate is interrupted and becomes
The previous wrong method if often used to protect the closed cooling nozzles from overheating in case of the hot
bar (around 1000 deg C) at the entry, leads to water leakages. Hence, a correct design is to be there to present a
Partial or complete clogging of some cooling nozzles can cause irregular cooling around the product.
Partial or complete clogging of the strippers can cause over-cooling of the rebar because the cooling is not stopped
at the exit of the installation. Water in the downstream guides can also affect the photocell detection which drives
Wrong location of the tempering pyrometer can result into no visibility to control the process.
In case there is no pyrometer maintenance (electronic protection by cooling, periodic cleaning of lens, periodic
checking in front of a black body furnace) then it causes a temperature drift and then the produced rebars gets
rejected.
If there is no pinch-roll at exit of the quenching line, or there is wrong pinching / speed setting, then it leads to large
Various characteristics properties of the Tempcore steel rebar are described below.
Type of steel – Steels for the Tempcore rebars are basically plain low carbon steels
specified for yield strength, ductility, carbon or carbon equivalent and yield to tensile
ratio. The maximum and minimum specified carbon content intends to ensure
weldability and hardenability. With too low carbon content, hardenability of the steel
is generally not sufficient and hence more severe quenching is needed which affects
the rolling mill design, e.g., speed of rolling mill, as well as the length and efficiency of
cooling chamber. Carbon steel with carbon content in the range of 0.13 % to 0.24 %
and the carbon equivalent (CE) of less than 0.45 % has been proved to be the best
balance to satisfy the above considerations.
The microstructure is usually fine due to a relative fast cooling in the core and because
of the thermo-mechanical treatment involved in Tempcore process, e.g., polygonal
ferrite grains in the core region can be as small as 8 micrometers in diameter and even
3 micrometers in diameter when lower tempering temperature is used. However,
coarse conglomerate of pseudo-eutectoid and Widmanstatten ferrite in the core are
also possible outcome of the process. The microstructure of the Tempcore steel rebar
is shown in Fig 8.
Fig 8 Microstructure of Tempcore steel rebar
Typical etched cross section showing the three metallurgical regions and typical
microstructures and the homogeneity of the microstructure of Tempcore steel rebar
are shown in Fig 9.
Effects of process parameters and steel composition -The process parameters and
steel compositions play part in the final properties. Normally if the martensite layer is
thicker the retained heat is less and thus the tempering is more modest so that the
rebar shows higher yield strength and lower elongation. Longer quenching time, lower
finishing temperature and higher intensity of quenching result in thicker martensitic
layer and lower tempering temperature. Higher carbon and manganese content
increases the hardenability of the steel, and hence more martensite is formed.
Additionally, the strength of the tempered martensite increases as the carbon content
increases.
The models in Fig 5 describe the relationship between yield strength and all
influencing parameters. The model was originally used for the design of installations.
Although tempering temperature does not appear in this model directly, the finishing
temperature, quenching time, bar diameter and water flow rate relate to it quite
strongly. Elongation of Tempcore steel rebars has a virtually linear correspondence
with the yield strength.
Tensile properties – The Tempcore process can increase the yield stress for a given
composition by 150 MPa to 200 MPa without losing much elongation. The tensile
properties of the bars depend on the process parameters and steel composition. The
range of typical yield strength of Tempcore steel rebar is between 415 MPa to 550
MPa and elongation on a 5d gauge length is 30 % down to 25 % in the same order. The
features of typical stress strain curve shows (i) elastic modulus is 200,000 MPa, (ii) the
bar has marked yield point and a Luders type of yield and hence the 0.01 % proof
stress coincides with 0.2 % proof stress, (iii) the ratio of yield stress to tensile strength
is around 0.85, and (iv) the bar has large elongation (25 % to 30 %), large Luders
strain and large uniform strain.
Tempcore steel rebar has two major features when the tensile properties are
compared with those of conventional steel bar. These features are (i) higher ratio of
yield strength to tensile strength, 0.85 versus 0.65 in case of conventional bar, and (ii)
larger elongation, 25 % versus 4.5 % to 22 % in case of conventional steel bar.
Tab 1 Comparison of the bending properties of Tempcore steel rebars with conventional steel
bars
Typical D values
Bend test
Conventional steels Tempcore steel rebar
(CE = 0.61 %) (CE = 0.30 %)
Note: Bendability is expressed in terms of minimum bending diameter D. (D is the ratio of the
minimum possible bending diameter to the rebar diameter
Weldability – Weldability of steel is very sensitive to the chemical composition,
especially to the carbon content and carbon equivalent (CE). Two popular formulas
are used, one is followed by the International Institute for Welding (IIW) and the other
is given by Ito and Besseyo, covering the high and low ranges of carbon respectively.
IIW formula is CE = C + (Mn + Si)/6 + (Cr + Mo + V)/5 + (Cu + Ni)/15 for carbon higher
than 0.18 %, while the formula of Ito and Besseyo is CE = C + Si/30 + (Mn + Cu +
Cr)/20 + Ni/60 + Mo/15 + V/10 + 5B for carbon less than 0.18 %. The IIW carbon
equivalent formula shows less tolerance to substitutional alloying elements than the
Ito-Besseyo equation. For the weldability of steel re bars, normally the IIW formula or
simplified IIW formula (CE = C + Mn/6) is used because of the carbon content.
With the IIW formula, when CE is less than 0.45 % the steel is considered weldable
with modern techniques. The CE of the Tempcore steel rebars is well below the critical
value of 0.45 % and thus again is superior to other types of rebars.
The excellent weldability of the Tempcore steel rebars is well demonstrated by the
bend test on a cross weld (Fig 10). There is no sign of HAZ cracking in the weld of a 20
mm diameter bar when it is bent at an angle of 180 degrees on a 3d mandrel. The
Tempcore steel rebars in low temperature and/or in wet state show remarkable
weldability. No preheat and no post heat is necessary.
Fig 10 Bending of the Tempcore rebar with a cross weld
The excellent weldability is also demonstrated by the tensile properties obtained after
welding. In flush butt weld no decrease in yield strength is generally noticed with the
fracture located outside the weld. Also, it is seen that under different weld and welding
processes, no cracks occur in the weld.
Properties of heat resistance of the Tempcore steel rebars are of importance because
of the possibility of fire damage. This resistance has been evaluated by two ways
namely (i) tensile strength loss at room temperature after previous heat application,
and (ii) tensile strength loss at elevated temperature. It has been shown that after
heating in laboratory conditions at temperatures between 250 deg C and 900 deg C for
half an hour, the room temperature tensile strength increases slightly with preheating
upto 500 deg C and significant drop occurs above that temperature. This property is as
good as cold twisted rebars and better than those shown by some hot rolled bars. Cold
-worked rebars start to lose strength at 300 deg C to 400 deg C. Hot rolled steel bars
lose considerable strength from 350 deg C onwards and hot-rolled low carbon micro-
alloyed steel rebar starts to show loss in strength from 600 deg C. Tensile strength of
Tempcore steel rebars at elevated temperature is similar to cold worked and micro-
alloyed rebars with a 20 % and 40 % reduction in yield strength at 300 deg C and 500
deg C respectively.