Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Project On "Caster Slab Dimensional Accuracy Technique"

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16

PROJECT ON

“CASTER SLAB DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY


TECHNIQUE”

BY

RUSHABH PARVANI
B.E.-3,(METALLURGICAL AND MATERIAL SCI. ENGG.)
FACULTY OF TECH. AND ENGG.
M.S. UNIVERSITY OF BARODA
REF CODE-09VT137GE
INTRODUCTION
Continuous casting transforms molten metal into solid on a continuous basis and
includes a variety of important commercial processes. These processes are the
most efficient way to solidify large volumes of metal into simple shapes for
subsequent processing. Most basic metals are mass-produced using a continuous
casting process, including over 500 million tons of steel, 20 million tons of
aluminum, and 1 million tons of copper, nickel, and other metals in the world each
year.

Continuous casting is distinguished from other solidification processes by its


steady state nature, relative to an outside observer in a laboratory frame of
reference. The molten metal solidifies against the mold walls while it is
simultaneously withdrawn from the bottom of the mold at a rate which maintains
the solid / liquid interface at a constant position with time. The process works best
when all of its aspects operate in this steady-state manner.

Relative to other casting processes, continuous casting generally has a higher


capital cost, but lower operating cost. It is the most cost- and energy- efficient
method to mass-produce semi-finished metal products with consistent quality in a
variety of sizes and shapes. Cross-sections can be rectangular, for subsequent
rolling into plate or sheet, square or circular for long products, and even “dog-
bone” shapes, for rolling into I or H beams.

Many different types of continuous casting processes exist.Vertical machines are


used to cast aluminum and a few other metals for special applications. Curved
machines are used for the majority of steel casting and require bending and / or
unbending of the solidifying strand. Horizontal casting features a shorter building
and is used occasionally for both nonferrous alloys and steel. Finally, thin strip
casting is being pioneered for steel and other metals in low-production markets in
order to minimize the amount of rolling required.

1. Steel Continuous Casting

Continuous casting is a relatively new process in historical terms. Although the


continuous strip casting process was conceived by Bessemer in 1858, the
continuous casting of steel did not gain widespread use until the 1960s. Earlier
attempts suffered from technical difficulties such as “breakouts”, where the
solidifying steel shell sticks to the mold, tears, and allows molten steel to pour out
over the bottom of the machine. This problem was overcome by Junghans in 1934
by vertically oscillating the mold, utilizing the concept of “negative strip” where
the mold travels downward faster than the steel shell during some portion of the
oscillation cycle to dislodge any sticking.[1] Many other developments and
innovations have transformed the continuous casting process into the sophisticated
process currently used to produce over 90% of steel in the world today, including
plain carbon, alloy and stainless steel grades.[1]

FIGURE 1
steel flows from a ladle, through a tundish into the mold. The tundish holds
enough metal to provide a continuous flow to the mold, even during an
exchange of ladles, which are supplied periodically from the steelmaking
process. The tundish can also serve as a refining vessel to float out
detrimental inclusions into the slag layer. If solid inclusion particles are
allowed to remain in the product, then surface defects such as “slivers” may
form during subsequent rolling operations, or they may cause local internal
stress concentration, which lowers the fatigue life. To produce higher quality
product, the liquid steel must be protected from exposure to air by a slag
cover over the liquid surface in each vessel and by using ceramic nozzles
between vessels. If not, then oxygen in the air will react to form detrimental
oxide inclusions in the steel.

Once in the mold, the molten steel freezes against the water-cooled walls of
a bottomless copper mold to form a solid shell. The mold is oscillated
vertically in order to discourage sticking of the shell to the mold walls. Drive
rolls lower in the machine continuously withdraw the shell from the mold at
a rate or “casting speed” that matches the flow of incoming metal, so the
process ideally runs in steady state. The liquid flow rate is controlled by
restricting the opening in the nozzle according to the signal fed back from a
level sensor in the mold.

The most critical part of the process is the initial solidification at the
meniscus, found at the junction where the top of the shell meets the mold,
and the liquid surface. This is where the surface of the final product is
created, and defects such as surface cracks can form, if problems such as
level fluctuations occur. To avoid this, oil or mold slag is added to the steel
meniscus, which flows into the gap between the mold and shell. In addition
to lubricating the contact, a mold slag layer protects the steel from air,
provides thermal insulation, and absorbs inclusions.

Below mold exit, the thin solidified shell (6-20 mm thick) acts as a container
to support the remaining liquid, which makes up the interior of the strand.
Water or air mist sprays cool the surface of the strand between the support
rolls. The spray flow rates are adjusted to control the strand surface
temperature with minimal reheating until the molten core is solid. After the
center is completely solid (at the “metallurgical length” of the caster, which
is 10 - 40m) the strand is cut with oxyacetylene torches into slabs or billets
of any desired length.

Different continuous casting processes exist to produce cross sections of


different shapes and sizes. Heavy, four-piece plate molds with rigid backing
plates are used to cast large, rectangular “slabs”, (50-250 mm thick and 0.5–
2.2 m wide), which are rolled into plate or sheet. Similar molds are used for
casting relatively square “blooms”, which range up to 400 x 600 mm in
cross section. Single-piece tube molds are used to cast small, square “billets”
(100 - 200 mm thick) which are rolled into long products, such as bars,
angles, rails, nails, and axles. The new strip casting process is being
developed using large rotating rolls
FIGURE 2

as the mold walls to solidify 1-3mm thick steel sheet.

When casting large cross sections, such as slabs, a series of rolls must
support the soft steel shell between mold exit and the metallurgical length, in
order to minimize bulging due to the internal liquid pressure. Extra rolls are
needed to force the strand to “unbend” through the transition from the
curved to the straight portion of the path shown in Fig. 1. If the roll support
and alignment are not sufficient, internal cracks and segregation may result.
These defects will persist in the final product, even after many rolling and
other operations, so it is important to control the casting process.

The process is started by plugging the bottom of the mold with a “dummy
bar”. After enough metal has solidified like a conventional casting onto its
head, the dummy bar is then slowly withdrawn down through the continuous
casting machine and steady state conditions evolve. The process then
operates continuously for a period of one hour to several weeks, when the
molten steel supply is stopped and the process must be restarted. The
maximum casting speed of 1-8 m/min is governed by the allowable length of
the liquid core, and to avoid quality problems, which are generally worse at
higher speeds.

After the steel leaves the caster, it is reheated to a uniform temperature and
rolled into sheet, bars, rails, and other shapes. Modern steel plants position
the rolling operations close to the caster to save on reheating energy. The
application of computational models to understand and improve this process
is discussed in “Model_Chap”.
Continuous casting process in ESSAR STEEL:-
ESSAR STEEL contains 3 continuous casting machines. All of them are
automated by the company SMS-DEMAG. They are namely CCM-1, CCM-2,
CCM-3. CCM-1 and CCM-2 are having bend rolled casting while CCM-3 has
vertical roll process.

In the continuous casting process in ESSAR STEEL the other difference between
the caster machines have oscillating moulds which enhances the speed of casting
and prevents solidification of metal in the moulds.

In CCM1 and CCM2 the mould oscillations are done by the means of mechanical
motors. While CCM3 has hydraulically operated machine mould oscillator. This
gives a constant force in every stroke of oscillation which enhances the
productivity of the machine.

PROFILE OF THE CASTER MACHINES IN ESSAR STEEL:-

1. CASTER-1
WIDTH OF THE SLABS PRODUCES: 800-2000 MM
SEGMENTS:15
2. CASTER-2
WIDTH OF THE SLABS PRODUCES: 800-1550 MM
SEGMENTS:15
3. CASTER-3
WIDTH OF THE SLABS PRODUCES: 800-2000 MM
SEGMENTS:14
The flow of the liquid metal from ladle to tundish is controlled by slide gate
mechanism, and the flow of metal from tundish to mould is controlled by stopper
mechanism. The liquid metal is then rolled under in between segments and cooled
simultaneously with help of water jets which are automatically controlled. The
speed at which the casting is done are of utmost controlling factor for the quality of
the slabs produces.

The slabs are normally produced with thickness of 220mm. these slabs are then
processed in HOT STRIP MILL in which the thickness is reduces from 220mm to
up to 0.6 mm. Hence a slightest inclusion or SLIVER in the slab will be increased
to a great extent in terms of surface area when the slab thickness is reduced. Hence
the main aim of concast machine is to produce a sound casting which is mainly
governed by factors like temperature and speed of casting.

PROJECT ON SLAB SHRINKAGE

Basic Concept

 It is observed in concast process that during water jet cooling the avg. speed
of the casting process is the most important factor governing the Quality and
Dimensional accuracy of the casting slabs. If the speed is slow Avg. Width-
Theoretical Width then will come on negative side. If the speed is high then
Avg. Width-Theoretical Width will come on the positive side.
AIM OF PROJECT:-

So now it is clear that a OPTIMUM THRESHOLD SPEED(OTS) must be


established in each GRADE CLASS of steel for different widths so that we get
very high dimensional accuracy as far as widths are concerned. This will result in
maximization of dimensional accuracy which will ultimately increase the
productivity and result in reduction of cost of the process as a whole. If the speed
prediction is available it will also help in REALISTIC prediction and planning of
future production rate and costing.

To establish a accurate OTS we must be well aware of the factors governing the
Avg. Speed of casting.
Factors affecting the average speed:-

The avg speed of casting is calculated in unit of met./min. in ESSAR STEEL.

The main factors governing are :

 Set width of the slab


 Grade class of the steel
 Type of caster

It may be observed that the type of caster is taken in consideration only to


maintain uniformity which will help in establishing individual relations with the
above factors.

Data available:-

The following data were available of January 2010 to June 2010:-

 Date of Casting
 Caster
 Slab No
 Heat No
 Grade
 GRADE CLASS
1. LCMA(LOW CARBON MICRO ALLOY)
2. LC(LOW CARBON)
3. HCMA(HIGH CARBON MICRO ALLOY)
4. HC(HIGH CARBON)
5. VHC(VERY HIGH CARBON)
6. PERI(PERITECTIC)
7. PCMA(PERI CARBON MICRO ALLOY)
 Set Width
 Avg. Width
 Theoretical Width
 Avg. Width-Theoretical Width
 Avg. Speed
Hence we have all the parameters that govern the OTS which will cause us to
establish individual relations with avg, speed.

Avg Speed and Set Width:

Initially all other factors were kept constant other than set width to observe a relation
between avg. speed and set width. It was observed that with increasing set width the
avg. speed decreases.

Grade class and Avg. Width-Theo. Width:

GRADE CLASS Avg. Width-Theo. Width (MM)


PCMA -3 -5 -3 - - -
LCMA 0 1 4 3 -2 -
HCMA -2 -3 -1 0 6 0
HC 2 1 3 4 11 3
LC 4 6 5 1 - 6
PERI 7 8 11 16 7 20
WIDTH(MM) 925-1125 1126- 1326- 1526- 1726- 2000
1325 1526 1725 1925

Hence from the above table we observe that HCMA grade has highest Avg. Width-
Theo. Width on negative side and PERI grade has highest Avg. Width-Theo.
Width on positive side.

It was observed that HC has Avg. Width-Theoretical Width nearest to zero.This is


due to the fact that as the carbon content increases the ductility decreases which
restricts the quantity to vary from zero. In LC the expansion was high. the highest
Avg. Width-Theo. Width was in PERI maybe due to the fact that when cooled it
forms a liquid and solid causing higher Avg. Width-Theo. Width.
It was observed that Avg. Width-Theo. Width in microalloys like HCMA and
LCMA was highly on the negative side. Hence it gives the idea that micro alloy
addition causes great changes in the dimensional and elastic properties of steel.

Optimum Threshold Speed(OTS):

The OTS is the speed at which the particular grade class in a set width which
causes Avg. Width-Theo. Width tending to zero.

This can be achieved if we observe the scatter trend of avg. speed v/s Avg. Width-
Theo. Width any grade class at a particular class of width.

Then by plotting the moving average of the scatter graph we can get the OTS by
marking the point at which the moving average line intersects with the Zero Avg.
Width-Theo. Width line.

It must noted that in all cases the OTS must be such that it must have some room
for variation and the Avg. Width-Theo. Width must not vary greatly by the
slightest change in avg. speed.
OTS(MM/MIN ) AT VARIOUS SET WIDTH OF SLAB(MM)

925-1025 1025-1125 1125-1225 1225-1325 1325-1525 1525-1725 1875 1900 1925 2000
GRADE
CLASS

LCMA 1.43 1.1 1.275 1.2 1.19 1.56 0.88 - - -

LC 1.53 1.51 1.25 1.15 1.395 1 - - - -

HCMA 1.05 1.35 1.2 0.95 1.3 1.04 1.09 0.92

HC 0.83 1.2 1.15 1.18 1 1 0.91 0.89 1.01

PCMA 1.5 1.18 1.09 1.13 - 0.85 - - -

PERI 1.14 1.2 - 1.07 - - - - -

VHC 1 - - - - - - - - -

SIL - 1.3 - - - - - - -

The above chart gives the info of the OTS of different grade class at various widths.
1.8

1.6

1.4

1.2
LCMA
LC
1 Moving average (LC)
HCMA
Moving average (HCMA)
HC
0.8 PCMA
PERI
VHC
SIL
0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12

The above chart describes the variation of OTS in various grade classes.

CONCLUSION:-
The above results gives us various OTS values if we run the casting at this speed
we can get the Avg. Width-Theo. Width tending to zero.

It may also be noted that below the OTS the Avg. Width-Theo. Width will mostly
be on the negative side and above OTS the Avg. Width-Theo. Width will be on the
positive side. As noted if Avg. Width-Theo. Width is positive then we get the
freedom to set the width changes which can be frequently seen in grades which
needs scarfing. But if Avg. Width-Theo. Width is negative then the degree of
freedom is lost in grades that require scarfing such as HIGH CARBON grades.

The values which are not given are either very high value of Avg. Width-Theo.
Width is not casted at the particular range of set width.

Also with the help of correlation between charts of Avg. Width-Theo. Width and
avg. speed at various widths we can establish a relation between Avg. Width-Theo.
Width and avg. speed

The highest observed OTS was 1.56mm/min. in LCMA grade class in range 1525-
1725mm set width range.

With these speeds the almost Avg. Width-Theo. Width tending to zero can be
achieved which results in and reduction of costs. This will help enhance the
productivity of the continuous casting process.

Also it will result in sound casting slab at once with less number of crackes
frequently observed in that grades.
THANKING NOTE
I would like to thank MR.S.BANERJEE(HOD SMP) for giving time, interest
and knowledge as my Vocational Training Guide and MR.R.Sanghwai(HOD
CASTER) as my project guide for giving me vast amount of knowledge and
answering all my queries.

I would also like to thank:-

MR.V.V.APPARAO(TECH CELL,CASTER)

MR.MURALI(TECH CELL,CASTER)

MR.AWINASH SAWRANKAR(ELC ACADEMY).

MR.KARTHIK(TECH CELL, CASTER)

MR.MAYUR(TECH CELL, CASTER)

AND ALL OTHER PEOPLE WHO GAVE ME KNOWLEDGE.

Without the help of whom the project would not have been possible.

You might also like