Cafeine PDF
Cafeine PDF
Cafeine PDF
FOREWORD INTRODUCTION
CAFEINE
CAS : 58-08-2
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 1
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
2 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
lead company BASF AG has assured us of its willingness to amend
those points as and if requested by the OECD members.
OEC
D/ICCA - The BUA* Peer Review Process
Qualified BUA personnel (toxicologists, ecotoxicologists) perform a quality control on the full SIDS
dossier submitted by industry. This quality control process follows internal BUA guidelines/instructions for
the OECD/ICCA peer review process and includes:
- a full (or update) literature search to verify completeness of data provided by industry in
the IUCLID/HEDSET
- Check of adequacy of selection process for key studies for OECD endpoints, and, where
relevant, for non-OECD endpoints by checking original reports/publications
- Review of full SIDS dossier (including SIAR, SIAP and proposal for conclusion and
recommendation for further work)
In case of data gaps, review of testing plan or rationale for not testing.
*
BUA (GDCh-Beratergremium fr Altstoffe): Advisory Committee on Existing Chemicals of the Association of
German Chemists (GDCh)
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 3
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
O N N
Structural Formula
N N
RECOMMENDATIONS
Human Health
Animal data
In animals studies caffeine showed acute toxicity LD50 rat oral 200-400 mg/kg bw, LD50 mouse oral 185 mg/kg bw, LC50 rat
inhalative ca. 4.94 mg/l/4h; LD50 rat dermal > 2000 mg/kg bw). The undiluted substance was not irritating to the eyes of
rabbits, the substance in a 50% aqueous dilution was not irritating to the skin of rabbits. In a 90-day-drinking water study in
rats and mice a slight decrease of body weight gain was observed. No clinical signs of toxicity and significant gross lesion or
microscopic findings were seen in either rats or mice. The NOAEL for rats was 1500 ppm (ca. 151-174 mg/kg bw/day) and for
mice 1500 ppm (ca. 167-179 mg/kg bw/day). In all dose groups effects on salivary glands were observed, which were regarded
as an adaptive and reversible response to the sympathomimetic effect of caffeine. There are numerous studies available
concerning genetic toxicity in vitro and in vivo. In the majority of the studies caffeine produced negative results. Several positive
responses were obtained only in studies which used extreme culture conditions, lethal doses or non-validated methods. There
was no statistically significant increase in the tumor incidence in treated animals as compared to controls even at doses exceeding
the maximum tolerated dose and given to rats over a major portion of their lifespan.
Caffeine resulted in reproductive effects occurring in the presence of general toxicity in parental rats and mice. A NOAEL in
rats was not established. NOAEL: mouse 22 mg/kg bw/d (F0 parental, F1 offspring), 88 mg/kg bw/d (F1 parental, F2
offspring).
Gross malformations were observed in rats and mice only after bolus administration (i.p. or gavage) of very high maternal toxic
doses. Fetotoxicity without maternal toxicity was observed in one drinking water study. NOAEL: 360 ppm (51 mg/kg bw/d)
(maternal), 70 ppm (10 mg/kg bw/d) (fetotoxicity), 2000 ppm (205 mg/kg bw/d) (teratogenicity). However, in two other
gavage studies with lower doses this finding was not confirmed. No NOAEL for maternal toxicity could be established; the
NOAEL for developmental toxicity was 40 mg/kg bw/d; no teratogenic effects were observed.
Absorption from gastrointestinal tract is rapid. Peak plasma levels are reached after 15 to 120 minutes after ingestion. The
elimination half-life in adults is about 2.5 to 4.5 hours. A small percentage is excreted in bile, salvia, semen and breast milk. In
both humans and rats, excretion mainly occurs via urine (about 90 % dose in rats; > 95 % in humans).
4 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
Caffeine metabolism is qualitatively similar in animals and humans. The main metabolic pathways are: demethylation and
hydroxylation of the 8-position leading to the formation of the respective uracil and uric acid derivatives. There are, however,
some quantitative differences in the metabolic profile.
Low doses (up to 2 g/ml in blood) stimulate the central nervous system, while high blood concentrations (10-30 g/ml)
produce restlessness, excitement, tremor, tinnitus, headache, and insomnia. Caffeine can induce alterations in mood and sleep
patterns, increase diuresis and gastric secretions. Acute toxicity is rare and is the result of an overdose. Lethal dose is estimated
to be 5 g.
Caffeine and coffee consumption are highly correlated in most populations studied; thus it is difficult to separate the two
exposures in epidemiologic investigations. No association between moderate consumption of coffee/caffeine and cardiovascular
diseases was demonstrated in more recent studies. In short-term clinical trials an increase in blood pressure was seen, whereas
in other surveys no relationship between caffeine consumption and elevation of blood pressure was observed. Caffeine
consumed in moderate amounts did not cause persistent increase in blood pressure in normotensive subjects. Effect on cardiac
rhythm is still in debate. Small increase in calcium excretion associated with coffee/caffeine intake was seen in subjects with
dietary calcium deficiency. Caffeine has weak reinforced properties, but with little or no evidence for upward dose adjustment,
possibly because of the adverse effects of higher doses. Withdrawal symptoms, although relatively limited with respect to
severity, do occur, and may contribute to maintenance of caffeine consumption. Caffeine use is not associated with
incapacitation. There is little evidence for an association of caffeine intake and benign breast disease. No association was found
in a study with biopsy -confirmed controls.
A cohort study with short follow-up period showed no association between caffeine consumption and mortality from cancers
at all sites. Case control studies of breast cancer showed no association with caffeine intake. Weak positive associations
between caffeine intake and lung, bladder or pancreas cancer as well as a weak inverse association between caffeine intake and
colon cancer may be due to bias or confounding. IARC evaluated that there is inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans.
There are conflicting reports on the effect of caffeine on human reproduction. A teratogenic effect has not been proven. While
caffeine intake up to 3-4 cups/day or 300 mg caffeine/day is unlikely to be causally related to spontaneous abortions or relevant
reduction of birth weight, an association between higher daily caffeine intake and these endpoints can not be excluded.
Conflicting results exist regarding a potential relationship between caffeine/coffee consumption and delayed conception or
infertility.
Environment
Caffeine has a water solubility of 20 g/l, a vapor pressure of 4.7 * e-6 Pa and a log Kow of 0.091.
Distribution modelling using Mackay, Level I, indicates that the main target compartment will be water with 99.99%.
Concerning biodegradation there is only a not valid study available for caffeine. However, from the structurally analogous
compound theophylline it can be concluded that caffeine is readily biodegradable. The calculated hydrolysis rate is extremely
slow. In the atmosphere caffeine will be indirectly photodegraded by reaction with hydroxyl radicals with a half-life of 19.8
hours (calculated).
Bio- and geoaccumulation are not expected according to the log Kow (-0.091).
The acute aquatic toxicity has been determined for fish (Leuciscus idus LC50(96h) 87 mg/l), for aquatic invertebrates (Daphnia
magna EC50(48h) 182 mg/l) and for algae (Scenedesmus subspicatus ErC50 (72h), ErC10 (72h) >100 mg/l). Results from
prolonged or chronic studies are not available. Following the EU risk assessment procedure the PNEC aqua can be calculated to
0.087 mg/l by applying an assessment factor of 1000 on the most sensitive species (Leuciscus idus LC50(96h) 87 mg/l).
Exposure
Caffeine is produced with a volume of 10,000 to 15,000 tons per year, world-wide, including 3,000 to 4,000 tons of natural
caffeine. It is mainly used in the food and pharma sectors.
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 5
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
Furthermore caffeine is a naturally occurring substance in various plant species (e.g. 0.9 to 2.6% in green coffee beans). It is a
component in coffee, tea and cocoa. The use in food will be the predominant way of human exposure and of exposure of the
environment .
Production sites for the technical product: EU (Germany) 1, NAFTA 2, Japan 1, India 4 and China 10. Production sites for
natural caffeine are appr. 7 to 8 worldwide, thereof 4 in Europe.
Exposure to workers during production is adequately controlled by the use of engineering controlled methods in the industry of
the sponsored country.
Workplace measurements during filter changes (Germany) : 0.1- ca. 1.2 mg/m3 (8h).
At the German production site, process waters with relevant substance quantities are separated and combusted.
Environment : No recommendation for further work, because the substance is readily biodegradable, has a low bioaccumulation
potential and is only moderately toxic to aquatic organisms.
Human Health: No recommendation for further work for the following reasons:
The pharmacological properties of caffeine are well known. There are many studies relevant to reproductive toxicity; some
suggest an adverse effect but the total data base is inconsistent. The case of caffeine is regulated by food and drug agencies of
national governments.
6 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
FULL SIDS SUMMARY
PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL
ECOTOXICOLOGY
4.1 Acute/Prolonged Toxicity to Leuciscus idus DIN 38 412 part 15 LC50 (96 hours) = 87 mg/l
Fish
4.2 Acute Toxicity to Aquatic Daphnia EG 79/831, Annex V, part EC50 (48 hours) = 182 mg/l
Invertebrates magna C
4.3 Toxicity to Aquatic Plants e.g. Scenedesmus OECD 201 EC50 (72 hours) >100 mg/l
Algae subspicatus
4.4 Toxicity to bacteria Pseudomonas DIN 38412 part 8, draft EC50 (17 hours) = 3,490 mg/l
putida
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 7
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
CAS NO: 58-08-2 SPECIES PROTOCOL RESULTS
TOXICOLOGY
5.1.2 Acute Inhalation Toxicity Rat OECD 403 Ca. 4.94 mg/l/4h, aerosol
5.1.3 Acute Dermal Toxicity Rat Comparable to OECD > 2000 mg/kg bw
guideline 402
5.4 Repeated Dose Toxicity Rat 90 days, drinking water, NOAEL 1500 ppm (174 mg/kg bw/d females,
NTP program, 151 mg/kg bw/d males)
Mouse 90 days, drinking water, NOAEL 1500 ppm (179 mg/kg bw/d females,
NTP program 167 mg/kg bw/d males)
5.8 Toxicity to Reproduction Rat Continuous breeding, task NOAEL parental/F1 not established (reduced
1-4 body weight gain in all treated groups)
8 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5.9 Developmental Toxicity/ Rat Drinking water day 0-20 NOAEL maternal = 51 mg/kg bw/d
Teratogenicity NOAEL fetotoxicity = 10mg/kg bw/d
NOAEL teratogen > 205 mg/kg bw/d
Rat Gavage, day 1-20, NTP LOAEL maternal 40 mg/kg bw/d
program NOAEL fetotoxicity = 40 mg/kg bw/d
NOAEL teratogen = 80 mg/kg bw/d
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 9
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
blood pressure. Effect on cardiac rhythm in
debate.
10 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
O N N
N N
Caffeine is soluble in water with 20 g/l at 20C (BASF AG, 2001a) and has a calculated vapour pressure
of 0.0000047 Pa at 25C (BASF AG, 2000a). The Henrys law constant has been estimated to 1.9*10-19
atm*m3/mole (Swann et al., 1983). The partition coefficient log Pow is measured to 0.091 at 23C (BASF
AG, 1988a). The density of caffeine is higher than that of water (1.23 g/cm3 at 18C) (The Merck Index,
1989, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; 1991-1992). The melting point is 235 239 C (BASF
AG, 2001a), Caffeine sublimes at 178C (The Merck Index, 1989).
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 11
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
2 GENERAL INFORMATION ON EXPOSURE
1999 the estimated world production amounts to 10,000 15,000 tons including 3,000 to 4,000 tons of
natural caffeine (Europe 5,000 10,000 t/a, Germany 1,000 5,000 t/a).
Production sites for the technical product:
EU (Germany) 1, NAFTA (USA, Canada, Mexico) 2, Japan 1, India 4 and China 10.
Production sites for natural caffeine are appr. 7 to 8 worldwide, thereof 4 in Europe.
Caffeine is a substance with wide disperse use. It is predominantly used in the food sector and pharma
sector (80% and 16% rsp.). A smaller part is used in cosmetics (3%) or in technical applications (1%).
Furthermore caffeine is a naturally occurring substance in various plant species (e.g. 0.9 to 2.6% in green
coffee beans). It is a component in coffee, tea and cocoa. The use in food will be the predominant way of
human exposure and of exposure of the environment.
In the Danish Product register (Aug. 2001) there are 6 products containing caffeine. Product types are
food/feedstuff flavourings and nutrients and laboratory chemicals.
Measured data on emission into the atmosphere or into surface water via waste water treatment plants are
not available. At the German production site, process waters with relevant substance quantities are
separated and incinerated (BASF AG, 2001c).
Distribution modelling using Mackay, Level I (V 2.1), indicates that the main target compartment will be
water with 99.99% (BASF AG, 2000a).
Caffeine is indirectly photodegraded by reaction with hydroxyl radicals in the atmosphere with a half-life of
19.8 hours (calculated) (BASF AG, 2000a). Concerning biodegradation there is only one test report
available (Henkel KgaA, 2000). In this test that was performed according to OECD 301 F two parallel
vessels were used. In one vessel a biodegradation of 58 % and in the other of 84 % was found. As the two
parallel vessels differ by more than 20 %, the validity criteria for the test are not fulfilled and the test has to
be regarded as not valid. However, for the structurally analogous substance theophylline (CAS No: 58-55-
9) there is a test on ready biodegradability available from whic h it can clearly be concluded that this
substance is readily biodegradable (OECD 301 A, 90 - 100 % after 22 days, >90% at the end of the 10-
days-window) (BASF AG, 2000b). As the two substances differ only by one methyl group it can be
concluded with high probability that also the substance caffeine is readily biodegradable. This is confirmed
by Richardson and Bowron (1985). They gave in a review report the information that caffeine is readily
biodegradable. However, as no further information is given on the test that was performed and the exact
results, this information cannot be validated. The calculated hydrolysis rate is extremely slow (T 1/2 >1 year)
(BASF AG, 2000a).
The estimated soil adsorption coefficient (log K oc 0,0135) suggests that caffeine would not absorb to soil
particles (BASF AG, 2000a). No experimental data on bioaccumulation are available. The log Kow of -
0.091 indicates no potential for bioaccumulation (BASF AG, 1988a).
Exposure of workers to caffeine during production is adequately controlled in the industry of the sponsor
country (Germany).
12 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
Caffeine is produced under controlled conditions in closed systems. Exposure may only occur during
occasional filter changes. In the bottling plant local exhaused systems are used. During filter changes, dust
masks, throw away protective suits, and gloves are worn. Hence, there is practically no exposure under
normal workplace conditions.
Workplace measurements (during filter changes), Germany: 0.1- ca. 1.2 mg/m3 (8h)
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 13
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
3 HUMAN HEALTH HAZARDS
In the human health section many review articles have been used, to which a Klimisch Code 4 (secondary
literature) was assigned, but which was felt adequate for the assessment of a substance with a huge amount
of data.
Remark: The scientific literature of caffeine comprises a lot of published studies and reviews due to its
containment in beverages (coffee, tea, cocoa, cola drinks, etc.) and its use as pharmaceutical. With a focus
on health and safety issues comprehensive reviews including those of the International Agency for Research
on Cancer (IARC), 1991 and Nehlig and Debry, 1996 and Christian and Brent, 2001 studies cited in
these reviews were choosen for the robust summary of caffeine. For selected endpoints (e.g. chronic,
carcinogenic, reproductive toxicity) additional up-date retrieval was done.
Caffeine and coffee consumption are highly correlated in most of the populations studies; thus, it is very
difficult to separate the two exposures in epidemiological studies. It was therefore not possible to evaluate
adequately the effect of caffeine per se. Most of the studies examined the relationship between drinking
cups of coffee per day and reproductive effects. The caffeine consumption by other sour ces as tea and
cola as well as quantitative differences between various types of coffee often have not been considered
appropriately.
Thus, the impact of potentially both differential and non-differential misclassification cannot be addressed
adequately. It is often not even clear whether the true effect has been over- or underestimated.
In several studies potentially confounding factors such as alcohol, smoking, socioeconomic status, working
conditions have not been taken into account. Under these circumstances weak to moderate associations
might be pretended.
Kinetics
In humans caffeine is readily absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract (Chvasta and Cooke, 1971,
Marks and Kelly, 1973, Bonati et al., 1982, Blanchard and Sawers, 1983) . Caffeine is bound to
plasma proteins at levels of 10-30 % at a wide range of concentrations (Bonati and Garattini, 1984).
After oral doses of 5-8 mg/kg bw, peak plasma concentrations of 8-10 g/ml were reached (Bonati et
al., 1982, Blanchard and Sawers, 1983, Arnaud, 1987).
Peak plasma concentrations are reached in 15-120 minutes in humans and animals (Bonati et al., 1982,
Arnaud and Welsch, 1982), and half-lives of 2.5-4.5 hours were observed in humans and 2.5 h in rats
receiving a 4.0 mg/kg dose of caffeine.
Caffeine is eliminated by first order kinetics from humans (Bonati et al., 1982). Caffeine half-life is
increased in the neonatal period due to the immaturity of hepatic enzyme systems (Aranda et al., 1979,
Parsons and Neims, 1981). It is also prolonged during the last trimester in pregnant women (Brazier et
al., 1983), and in women taking oral contraceptives (Patwardhan et al., 1980, Abernethy and Todd,
1985). The clearance of caffeine is stimula ted by smoking (Parsons and Neims, 1978, Jores et al.,
1988).
Caffeine is distributed relatively uniformly throughout all body tissues, including cerebrospinal fluid, breast
milk, salvia, and semen (Goldstein and Warren, 1962, Somani et al., 1980, Beach et al., 1982,
Rodopoules and Norman, 1996). The volume of distribution is about 0.7 l/kg bw (Arnaud, 1987).
14 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
The elimination of caffeine occurs through metabolism by hepatic microsomal enzyme systems (Grant et
al., 1987), and elimination is impaired in the presence of liver disease (Statland et al., 1976). Only a
small percentage is excreted unchanged in the urine (van der Merwe et al., 1988). Caffeine crosses
easily the placental barrier (Somani et al., 1980).
In both humans and rats, excretion mainly occurs via urine (about 90 % of the dose in rats; > 95 % in
humans) (Arnaud, 1993).
Metabolism
Caffeine metabolism is qualitatively relatively similar in animals and humans (Arnaud, 1993) . The main
metabolic pathways are: demethylation and hydroxylation of the 8-position leading to the formation of the
respective uracil and uric acid derivatives. There are, however, some quantitative differences in the
metabolic profile. Humans are characterized by the importance of 3methyl demethylation leading to the
formation of paraxanthine and especially metabolites thereof through subsequent metabolic steps. The main
urinary metabolites in humans are 1-methyluric acid, 1-methylxanthine, 5-acetylamino-6-formylamino-3-
methyluracil (not found in rats and mice), 1,7-dimethyluric acid and paraxanthin. In rats and mice, the
metabolism of caffeine is predominantly via theobromine and theophylline. The main urinary metabolites are
1,3-dimethyluracil, paraxanthine, trimethyluric acid, theophylline, and theobromine. Caffeine metabolism
decreases during pregnancy, resulting in higher serum concentrations.
Only rare deaths from overdosage of caffeine have been reported (Gilbert, 1976). It has been estimated
that 5 g to 10 g may be fatal in man (total dose, appr. 65 cups of coffee taken at one time) (Krantz and
Carr, 1951, Rivenes, 1997). Blood concentrations of 10-30 g/ml may produce restlessness,
excitement, tremor, tinnitus, headache and insomnia, low doses (up to 2 g/ml in blood) stimulate the
central nervous system (Ashton, 1987, Stavric, 1988). Some adverse effects like gastric symptoms,
insomnia, seizure, and fever were reported after overdosing (appr. 750 mg in an adult) (Lachance, 1982,
Stavric, 1988, FitzSimmons and Kidner, 1997, Daroca et al., 1996).
3.1.1.3.2 Hypertension
Short-term clinical studies have shown that in caffeine-naive subjects, 250 mg of caffeine increased systolic
blood pressure (Robertson et al., 1978, Ammon et al., 1983). In a cross-sectional study of 30,000
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 15
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
middle aged men consuming caffeine showed an inverse association with systolic and diastolic blood
pressure (Stensvold et al., 1989). Similar findings were reported in a multiple risk factor intervention trial
(Stamler et al., 1997) and in a cross-sectional study (Periti et al., 1987). Surveys of the general
population demonstrated a positive correlation between caffeine consumption and systolic but not diastolic
blood pressure (Lang, et al. 1983a, Lang et al., 1983b). No relationship between increasing caffeine
consumption and elevations of blood pressure was seen in large cross-sectional study in employees
(Bertrand et al., 1978). An immediate dose-related difference in systolic and diastolic blood pressure
were seen in healthy nonsmokers (Lane et al., 1998) and in hypertensive patients (Rachima-Maoz et
al., 1998).
Though consumption of caffeine (eight cups of regular coffee corresponding to 500 mg caffeine per day)
may exhibit acute increases in blood pressure, the long-term effects appear to be minimal. After one to four
days of regular consumption a tolerance develops, with blood pressure returning to previous levels.
3.1.1.3.3 Arrhythmias
Heavy coffee consumption ( 9 cups/day) was associated wit h more than twice the likelihood of
ventricular premature beats in a population survey (Prineas et al., 1980). However, Sutherland et al.,
1985, Roberston et al., 1981, Myers et al., 1987, Newsby, 1996 reported that caffeine doses up to
500 mg/day do not affect cardiac rhythm in normal subjects and patients.
16 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
Case reports and clinical studies of caffeine withdrawal most frequently reported symptoms of abrupt
withdrawal as mild to moderate headache beginning 12-24 hours after terminating intake (300 mg/day) and
lasting up to a week (Griffiths and Mumford, 1995, Griffiths and Woodson, 1988, Evans and
Griffiths, 1992). Decreased responsiveness to daily caffeine (500 mg/day) administration with respect to
blood pressure (Ammon et al., 1983, Roberston et al., 1981), diuresis (minimal effectiv diuretic dose
70 mg/day) (Eddy and Downs, 1928), and plasma epinephrine, norepinephrine, and plasma renin
activity (250 mg/day) (Robertson et al., 1978), but not to the effect of caffeine on urinary calcium
excretion (300 mg/day) was reported (Massey and Opryszek, 1990). No effect on mood and alertness
was seen after single caffeine dose (600 mg/day) (Sicard et al., 1996) or withdrawal (300 mg/day)
(Comer et al., 1997). Other studies on caffeine deprivation found an association with decreased vigor
and performance on reaction and increased fatigue (250 mg/day) (Phillips-Bute and Lane, 1998,
Bernstein et al., 1998).
3.1.1.4 Carcinogenicity
Heavy coffee consumption tends to be associated with other risk factors for various types of cancer, e.g.
smoking, alcohol, physical inactivity (Giovannucci, 1998 ). Residual confounding might explain weak
positive associations between caffeine consumption and lung, bladder, or pancreas cancer.
Based on the currently available literature Nehlig and Debrys (1996) conclusion that in the doses
usually consumed by man, coffee does not have any potential carcinogenic effect can still be supported.
Whether the consumption of doses higher than 4 mg/kg/day slightly enhances or lowers the risk for some
cancer types is currently not clear.
The IARC evaluates the carcinogenicity in humans of caffeine as inadequate evidence (IARC 1991).
3.1.1.4.2 Breast
Several case-control studies provided no association between coffee intake (up to 7 cups/day) and
breast cancer risk (IARC, 1991). Also new case-control studies confirmed this result (Hunter, 1992,
McLaughlin et al., 1992, Folsom et al., 1993, Levi et al., 1993, Smith et al., 1994, Tavani et al.,
1998).
3.1.1.4.3 Colon
Cohort studies that addressed the issue of coffee drinking (up to 3 cups/day) and risk of cancer of the
colon have generally been interpreted as showing no association. There are case-control studies that
indicated inverse associations and others find a risk. Bias and confounding could not be excluded as the
source of the apparent associations (IARC, 1991 ). In recent case-control and cohort studies no increased
risk of colorectal cancer from caffeine intake (up to 7 cups/day) was found (Cipriani and Geddes,
1996, Giovannucci, 1998, Hartman et al., 1998, Tavani et al., 1997). The lower risk of colorectal
cancer with high vs. low coffee consumption as determined in the meta-analysis by Giovannucci (1998)
might be due to an avoidance of coffee by unidentified high-risk individuals, or due to enhanced colonic
motility induced by coffee, or due to antimutagenic components in coffee (not necessarily caffeine).
3.1.1.4.4 Bladder
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 17
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
In cohort studies on coffee consumption neither an increase nor a decrease risk for bladder cancer was
found. Several case-control studies showed a weak positive association, while others did not. Taken as a
whole, the data are consistent with a weak positive relationship between coffee consumption (up to >5
cups/day) and the occurrence of bladder cancer, but the possibility that this is due to bias or confounding
cannot be excluded (IARC, 1991 ).
18 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
3.1.1.5.2 Low birth weight
Several studies assessing coffee, tea and cola consumption to estimate caffeine intake have shown an
association between maternal caffeine intakes greater than 70 to 300 mg/day and low birthweight (Caan
and Goldhaber 1989, Martin and Bracken 1987, Fenster et al. 1991a,b, Vlajinac et al., 1997).
Dose-response relationships have been noted in the two studies mentioned first.
A meta-analysis (Fernandes et al., 1998) including three of these and four other studies (the studies
are: Caan and Goldhaber 1989, Fenster et al. 1991a,b, Fortier et al. 1993, Linn et al. 1982,
Martin and Bracken 1987, McDonald et al. 1992, Mills et al. 1993) with extractable data showed
an overall risk ration of 1.51 (95 % CI 1.39-1.63) for low birthweight (< 2500 g) in 64,268 pregnancies
of women consuming > 150 mg caffeine per day. However, although the odds ratios in the individual
studies were adjusted for some confounding factors, the meta-analysis used unadjusted data only.
Adjustment of individual studies for confounding factors significantly would decreased the odds ratios for
low birth weight calculated in these studies.
There are several other studies, which showed only a very weak decrease in birthweight after high
consumption of caffeine (4 cups and more/day) (Olsen et al., 1991) or no association at all (Fortier et
al., 1993, Shu et al., 1995, Santos et al., 1998, Grosso et al., 2001).
The study by Grosso et al. (2001), for example, is one of the methodically better studies taking into
account several potential confounders and distinguishing between exposures during the first and third
trimesters, but only 2% of the participating women consumed more than 300 mg caffeine per day during
month 7 of the pregnancy. The authors reported an adjusted odds ratio of 1.0 with a wide 95% confidence
interval (0.37-2.70) for > 300 mg/day during month 7.
A recent study by Clausson et al., 2002 with relatively good assessment of exposure and confounding
factors does not support an association between moderate caffeine consumption and reduced birth weight,
gestational age, or fetal growth.
Klebanoff et al., 2002 found an association between an increasing risk of reduced fetal growth only among
women who smoked. However, since paraxanthine concentrations could not be related to an amount of
caffeine consumption the results cannot be used for a quantitative assessment.
It might be suggested that caffeine intake up to 3-4 cups/day or 300 mg caffeine/day is unlikely to cause a
relevant reduction in birthweight.
However, it cannot be excluded that higher caffeine consumption (>300 mg/day) exerts a small, but
measurable effect on fetal growth.
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 19
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
Spontaneous abortion
A meta-analysis (Fernandes et al., 1998) including six studies (the studies are: Armstrong et al.
1992, Dominguez-Rojas et al. 1994, Fenster et al. 1991a,b, Infante -Rivard et al. 1993, Mills et
al. 1993, Srisuphan and Bracken 1986) with extractable data showed an overall risk ratio of 1.36
(95 % CI 1.29-1.45) for spontaneous abortion in 42,988 pregnancies of women consuming > 150 mg
caffeine per day. However, although the odds ratios in the individual studies were adjusted for some
confounding factors, the meta-analysis used unadjusted data only. Adjustment of individual studies for
confounding factors significantly decreased the odds ratios for spontaneous abortion calculated in these
studies.
A potentially important factor which has not been addressed in this meta-analysis is the change in caffeine
consumption due to pregnancy-related nausea. Nausea can be considered as a marker for a healthy
pregnancy (Stein and Susser 1991 ).
Since nauseated women consume less caffeine and have a reduced risk of spontaneous abortion,
incomplete data on nausea and vomiting could lead to an overestimation of the risk associated with high
levels of caffeine consumption.
Cnattingius et al. (2000) point out that results of epidemiologic studies have given inconclusive results on
the association between caffeine consumption and spontaneous abortion. This might at least partly due to
the fact that most studies have not included data on symptoms of pregnancy (Armstrong et al., 1992,
Dlugosz et al., 1996, Infante-Rivard et al. 1993, Mills et al. 1993, Parazzini et al., 1998,
Srisuphan and Bracken, 1986) while those that did have used fairly insensitive markers such as
presence or absence of nausea at any time during pregnancy (Fenster et al.1991a,b, Fenster et al.,
1997, Klebanoff et al., 1999, Kline et al., 1991).
According to Cnattingius et al. (2000) only one study with sufficient sample size focused on the first
trimester of pregnancy when changes in caffeine intake, pregnancy-related symptoms, and the majority of
spontaneous abortions occur.
Cnattingius et al. (2000) found an association between caffeine consumption and spontaneous abortion
only in non-smokers (doses, odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals as follows: 100-299 mg/day: 1.3
(0.9-1.8), 300-499 mg/day: 1.4 (0.9-2.0), >= 500 mg/day: 2.2 (1.3-3.8). However, retrospective
exposure assessment based on interviews by midwives is a limitation of this study, and spurious positive
results due to increased caffeine ingestion among the case patients in response to lessening of the severity
of symptoms cannot be ruled out.
Klebanoff et al. (1999) reported an association of serum paraxanthine, a caffeine metabolite, with an
increased risk of spontaneous abortion only at very high concentrations (>= 95 th percentile). In this study
most of the case women had spontaneous abortions in the second trimester, and the use of paraxanthine as
a marker of caffeine dose has to be regarded with caution (intra- and interindividual variations in caffeine
metabolism, short half-life, long-term storage).
A recent study by Wen et al. (2001) showed no association between caffeine consumption and
spontaneous abortion in women who did not report nausea. However, the authors did observe an
association between caffeine consumption of 300 mg/day and more and spontaneous abortion in women
reporting nausea (odds ratio 5.4, 95% confidence interval 2.0-14.6). This is based on 4 cases only,
prospective data on caffeine intake and nausea status and duration have been collected only monthly, and
nausea severity has not been taken into account. Thus, other explanations than a causal relationship with
caffeine consumption have to be considered.
In conclusion, caffeine intake up to 3-4 cups/day or 300 mg caffeine/day is unlikely to be causally related
to spontaneous abortions. Nevertheless, in some subgroups of women (e.g. non-smokers, women with
nausea), higher caffeine consumption (>300 mg/day) might increase the risk of spontaneous abortions.
20 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
Based on two cohort and four case-control studies it was concluded, that taken together these studies do
not provide evidence of a teratogenic risk of coffee intake (IARC, 1991). Two studies in mothers taking
caffeine-containing drugs during pregnancy showed either a nonsignificant increase of congenital
malformations in cases (2.4 %) compared to controls (1.5 %) (Nelson and Forfar, 1971) or a slight
nonsignificant decrease (RR=0.98, 95 % CI 0.7 to 1.2) (Heinonen, 1982) . More recent studies showed
no relationship between caffeine consumption during pregnancy and incidence of malformations in offspring
(Olsen, 1991, Olsen et al., 1991). Retrospective information on caffeine intake during pregnancy
showed developmental delay or central nervous system dysfunction and congenital anomalies with coffee
consumption of 2 or more cups of coffee (Tanaka et al., 1990). In conclusion there is no relationship
between caffeine consumption up to 2 cups/day and malformations.
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 21
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
After oral application the LD50 for rats (10 animals/group/sex) was found to be 261-383 mg/kg bw; as
clinical symptoms of toxicity, dyspnoea and staggering were seen after oral intake (BASF AG 1985a). In
further reports the oral LD50 for rats was reported to be 200-400 mg/kg bw (NTP 1982a) and for mice
185 mg/kg bw (NTP 1982b). The inhalation of the substance by rats as an aerosol for a period of 4 h
resulted in an LC50-value of ca. 4.94 mg/l. Irregular and accelerated respiration were noted in this study
(BASF AG 1989b).
The LD50 for dermal application was >2000 mg/kg bw; no clinical symptoms of toxicity were observed
(BASF AG 1988d)
Conclusion: In animals studies caffeine showed moderate toxicity after oral uptake and inhalation and a low
acute toxicity after dermal treatment.
The undiluted substance was not irritating to the eyes of rabbits. Mean irritation indices were 0.9 (corneal
opacity), 0 (iritis), 1.6 (conjunctival erythema) and 0.6 (conjunctival edema). The strongest signs of
irritation were observed in 3/3 animals within the first 24h. By day 8 only one animal showed slight corneal
opacity and conjunctival redness. The substance in a 50% aqueous dilution was not irritating to the skin of
rabbits (Irritation index was 0) (OECD guideline 404 and 405, BASF, 1985b).
Conclusion: Caffeine is not irritating to skin and eyes.
3.1.4 Sensitization
22 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 23
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
3.1.5 Repeated Dose Toxicity
In a 90-day oral toxicity study, the test substance was administered in drinking water to groups of Fischer
344 rats and B6C3F1 mice (groups of 12 animals/sex).
Rats were given 188, 375, 750, 1500, and 3000 ppm in the drinking water (ca. 19.7, 42, 85.4, 151, 272
mg/kg bw/d for males and 23, 51, 104, 174, and 287 mg/kg bw/d for females, calculated from weight and
water consumption); control groups were given tap water.
The body weight gains of all treated groups were decreased. The effect was significant in the highest dose
only (reduction of 26%, males, 20%, females). Water consumption was decreased in rats given 3000 ppm,
whereas it was increased in the 750 and 375 ppm groups. No marked changes in clinical signs of toxicity
were observed up to 1500 ppm. No dose-related changes inclinical chemistry were seen. With one
exception (cellular enlargement in salivary gland), no pronounced significant changes in gross morphology
or microscopic findings were observed. The authors gave no description of adverse effects. The effect
observed in the salivary gland was described as dose dependent in rats; in mice it was observed only in the
highest dose group. The effects in the salivary gland were considered adaptive. Reversible effects in the
salivary glands are a well known pharmacological effect of caffeine (sympathicomimetic). These
morphological changes are not considered to be an adverse effect of the substance. Finally, microscopic
evaluation of sex organs revealed no significant differences between exposed and control rats (NTP Expt.,
1983).
NOAEL rat : 1500 ppm (male 151 mg/kg bw/d; female 174 mg/kg bw/d)
Mice were given 94, 188, 375, 750, and 1500 ppm in the drinking water (ca. 21, 44, 85, 130, 167
mg/kg bw/d for males; 25, 47, 88, 134, 180 mg/kg bw/d for females, caclulated from weight and water
consumption); control groups were given tap water.
Mean body weight gain was significantly, but not dose-dependently depressed for the 188, 375, and 750
ppm male dose group animals by 26%, 25%, 18% resp., but not in the 1500 ppm dose. Females showed
little variation in weight gain. Food consumption was unaffected. Water consumption was decreased by
10% and more in the 1500 and 750 ppm dose group animals, whereas the water consumption was
increased by 10% and more in the 94, 188, 375 ppm dose group animals. Adaptive changes in the salivary
glands were also observed in mice in the highest dose group only (explanation see rats). Additionally, no
tumors were seen in the salivary glands of mice which were treated with caffeine in the drinking water over
2 years (Mohr et al. 1984). Since no clinical signs of toxicity, or changes in clinical chemistry were seen,
neither were statistically significant changes in gross morpology or microscopic findings (including the sex
organs) observed (NTP Expt., 1983), the highest dose was the NOAEL.
NOAEL mice : 1500 ppm (male 167 mg/kg bw/d; female 179 mg/kg bw/d)
Additionally no significant toxic effects were reported in older studies (i.p., drinking water or dermal
application) that are poorly documented.
Conclusion:
In adequately performed studies, administration of high doses of caffeine (ca. 160 mg/kg bw in rats, ca.
170 mg/kg bw in mice) caused no significant toxic effects. In these studies no histopathological changes
were found in the gonads of rats and mice. The findings of testicular athrophy and decreased absolute testis
weights described in earlier feeding studies with Holtzman and Spraque Dawley rats could thus not be
confirmed (Friedman et al., 1979, Gans 1984).
24 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
3.1.6 Genetic Toxicity
There were many studies for different endpoints available. All studies were evaluated and in the following
text only the most relevant, well-documented studies are discussed.
Chromosomal aberrations
The substance did not induce chromosomal aberrations in the blood of rats after administration in feed
(46 mg/kg bw/d) for 117 weeks, (Granberg-Oehman et al., 1980) or in the testicular tissue of mice after a
single i.p. administration of 200 mg/kg bw (Adler, 1966).
No chromosomal aberrations or aneuploidy was observed in the oocytes of mice after i.p. application of
150 mg/kg bw (Mailhes et al. 1996).
Investigations with lymphocytes from human volunteers who had a daily intake of 800 mg (4x200 mg) of
caffeine over 4 weeks showed no increase in chromosome damage. The highest level of caffeine detected
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 25
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
in the plasma was 30 g/ml. Isolated lymphocytes from untreated donors administered this concentration
(30 g/ml) several times were also negative. However, caffeine produced damage in human lymphocytes in
culture after a single 48h treatment with 250-750 g/ml (Weinstein et al. 1972).
Further cytogenetic tests with bone marrow cells from mice and rats gave no indication of a clastogenic
effect (see IUCLID).
Most of the in vivo SCE-assays with rats, mice and hamsters were positive. However, in the 117 week
feed study in rats (Granberg-Oehman et al., 1978) no SCE induction was observed. However, a
toxicological relevance is questionable due to the other negative in vivo studies.
Caffeine was negative in the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test (i.p. administration of up to ca. 97
mg/kg) (King et al., 1979). In further micronucleus tests, Swiss CD-1 mice (in- and outbred mice)
received 50, 75 or 100 mg/kg bw caffeine and Chinese hamsters received 75, 150 or 300 mg/kg bw by
gavage twice with a 24h interval, and with the second dose being given 6h prior to sacrifice, or alternativly
given once 30h prior to sacrifice. Only the highest dose (in the range of the LD50) caused an induction of
micronuclei in hamsters and mice (Aeschbacher et al., 1986). Other poorly documented micronucleus
tests with rats and mice have been published and were also negative.
A study was performed by i.p. application to compare the ability of caffeine to induce micronuclei (in
mice and Chinese hamster) versus chromosomal aberrations , and SCE (in Chinese hamster)
(Tsuchimoto and Matter, 1979). In the micronucleus test with mice the doses used were 100 and 250
mg/kg bw and they were administered via i.p. twice with an interval of 24h. In the studies with hamsters,
100 and 200 mg/kg bw were used. For the micronucleus screening and chromosomal aberration tests, the
test substance was given twice via i.p. with an interval of 24h, and was only given one time via i.p. for the
SCE test. Niether a clastogenic effect nor an increase in SCE was seen in any of the studies.
In a Dominant lethal test male mice were gavaged with caffeine at 90 mg/kg bw for 5 consecutive days
or received it via drinking water at levels of 112 mg/kg bw for 8 weeks. No mutagenic induction of
dominant lethals, preimplantation losses or depression of female fertility attributable to the test substance
was observed (Aeschbacher et al., 1978). All other dominant lethal studies were likewise negative.
Conclusion:
A large number of in vitro results are available and were summarized in a comprehensive review (IARC
No. 51): Salmonella and classic E. coli studies were mostly negative. Special E. coli strains and
Saccharomyces showed positive results. In terms of gene mutation in mammalian cell cultures and UDS
assays, the results were consistently negative. Only at high concentrations were some indications of
clastogenic activity in cell lines found.
In the majority of in vivo tests (MNT; CA, DL, HMA) negative results were obtained in terms of
mutagenicity and clastogenicity. On the whole, the conclusion is drawn that under exposure relevant
conditions there are no indications of genotoxicity of caffeine. This is also the overall assessment of the
IARC evaluation (see publication No. 51, 1991 for more details).
3.1.7 Carcinogenicity
In a 104 week drinking water study, the substance was administered to Sprague -Dawley rats (groups of
50 animals/sex) at concentrations of 200, 430, 930 and 2000 ppm (12, 26, 49, 102 mg/kg bw/d males
and 15, 37, 80, 170 mg/kg bw/d, females). There was a slightly increased mortality in males at 2000 ppm.
Decreased body weights were found in both sexes at 930 ppm (11%) and 2000 ppm (25%), associated
with reduced food and water consumption.
26 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
There were no statistically significant differences between control and treated animals for tumor incidences
of any type except for mammary fibroadenomas. The incidence of mammary fibroadenomas showed a
significant inverse dose-response relationship (26% high dose vs. 50% control) (Mohr et al. 1984).
Several other carcinogenicity studies, including initiation-promotion studies, have been performed, and all
of them were negative; however, they were judged by IARC to be of limited value (e.g. only one dose was
used, or only one sex, or only one tissue (mammary gland of mice), or the animals were not exposed to the
test substance for 2 years). Due to these limitations they were not used as key studies for caffeine.
Conclusion:
There was no statistically significant increase in the tumor incidence of caffeine treated rats as compared to
controls, even at doses exceeding the maximum tolerated dose and given to animals over a major portion
of their lifespan.
Rat Study
The potential reproductive toxicity of caffeine in Sprague-Dawley rats was evaluated using the
Reproductive Assessment by Continuous Breeding (RACB) protocol.
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 27
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
Task 4 (second generation evaluation):
No mortality was observed in any of the F1 animals. No treatment-related differences were observed in
pup weights during lactation (post natal day 1-21). From the initiation of dosing (post natal day 22) through
the maturation phase up to the termination of Task 4, mean body weights of the F1 low-to-high dose males
and females were decreased dose-dependently (approximately 12%,18% and 23% when compared to
controls). Mean body weight and feed consumption were decreased (5-19%) in all treated groups.
A decrease in the number of live F2 pups per litter (21%) and the proportion of pups born alive (4%) in
the 50 mg/kg bw/d dose group was noted. No differences in other endpoints were observed between
dosed groups and controls.
A no-observable-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) was not established in this study as the 12.5 mg/kg
animals displayed reduced body weight gain in F0 and F1 animals (NTP, 1996).
Mice studies
Caffeine was tested for its effects on reproduction and fertility in Swiss CD-1 mice at two laboratories,
each using a variation on the standard RACB study design. One laboratory performed Tasks 1, 2, and 3,
while the other laboratory performed Tasks 1, 2, and 4 (see below) (NTP 1984 a,b).
There was no effect on the mean number of litters/pair or on the mean number of pups/litter. However,
there was a 20% reduction in the number of live male pups/litter in the 500 ppm group. The proportion of
pups born alive was reduced by 3%, 5%, and 5% in the low, middle and high dose groups, respectively.
Additionally, pup body weight adjusted for litter size was reduced by 4% at the high dose.
28 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
Task 4 was not performed in this study. After 7 days of vaginal smears to evaluate cyclicity, the control
and high dose (500 ppm) Task 2 mice were killed and necropsied. Female body weight was reduced by
5%, while relative organ weights were unchanged. Ante-mortem vaginal cyclicity was unaffected. Male
body weight was unchanged by consumption of 500 ppm caffeine but adjusted liver weight was increased
by 10%. Absolute testis weight dropped by 7% and adjusted seminal vesicles weight decreased by 12%.
Sperm motility values for controls was low (47% motile), so the 21% reduction in the treated group should
be viewed with caution. Similarly, the control epididymal sperm density was nearly equal to half of the
subsequent control values for this lab, so the significant increase in sperm density in the caffeine-treated
group is likely erroneous.
In conclusion, the slight but significant reductions in (male) pup number, pup viability, and adjusted pup
weight suggest that caffeine produced some slight reproductive toxicity. This occured in the presence of
slight indications of general toxicity (body or organ weight changes) (NTP 1984 a).
NOAEL (mouse): ca. 22 mg/kg bw/d (120 ppm) (F0 parental) (Task 2)
22 mg/kg bw/d (120 ppm) (F1 offspring) (Task 2)
Caffeine was tested in the other laboratory that performed Tasks 1, 2, and 4.
While there were no exposure-related changes in the number of litters/pair, viability, or adjusted pup
weight, the number of live pups per litter, averaged over 4-5 litters was decreased for the mid (15%) and
high dose (20%) animals.
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 29
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
In summary, a reduction in the number of live pups/litter for the F0 generation was the only reproductive
effect observed in this study. This occurred in the absence of a change in body weights in the F0 parental
mice, but in the presence of clinical findings in form of alopecia (NTP 1984 b).
NOAEL (mouse): ca. 22 mg/kg bw/d (120 ppm) (F0 parental) (Task 2)
22 mg/kg bw/d (120 ppm) (F1 offspring) (Task 2)
NOAEL (mouse): ca. 88 mg/kg bw/d (500 ppm) (F1 parental) (Task 4)
88 mg/kg bw/d (500 ppm) (F2 offspring) (Task 4)
In addition to the key studies described above, there are numerous other studies some of them with unusual
study designs described in the IUCLID master. In a two generation study with Wistar rats the
administration of 30 mg of caffeine/kg bw led to a marked degeneration of the testis in the F0 generation
males after 38 treatment days. The findings were characterized by a significant overall size reduction in the
testis, breakdown of the germinal epithelium, accumulation of cellular debris in the lumen of seminiferous
tubules, and a significant reduction in the abundance of mature spermatozoa (Pollard et al. 1988).
In another study when caffeine was administered to the dams during pregnancy (30 mg/kg/day from day 1
of gestation until sacrifice), a significant inhibition in the differentiation of the interstitial tissues and Leydig
cells was observed in their male fetuses. In the ovaries of female fetuses caffeine had no influence on the
mitotic rate or morphology of germ cells. Later in development the numbers of female germ cells entering
meiosis were comparable to the controls (Pollard et al. 1990).
In a further 2-generation study in Sprague-Dawley rats with an unusual study design, it was demonstrated
that the exposure to caffeine (30 and 60 mg/kg/day) did not affect the sexual receptivity, fertility, gestation
length, or maternal behaviour of the F1 females, but parturition was prolonged and the viability of the F2
generation was seriously jeopardised (Pollard, et al. 1992). All three studies are not comparable with
guideline-studies, and thus, these data are difficult to assess.
Three experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of feeding caffeine to Osborn-Mendel and
Holtzmann rats at a dietary level of 0.5% (ca. 230 mg/kg/d). An induction of testicular atrophy,
oligospermatogenesis and aspermatogenesis was observed after 14, 64 and 75 weeks in Osborn-Mendel
rats and after 19 weeks in Holtzmann rats (Friedman at al. 1979, Weinberger et al. 1978). Because of the
high mortality (75% at 14 weeks, 35% at 64 weeks, 60% at 75 weeks, 63% at 19 weeks) and the single
dose tested, the studies are regarded to be of limited value for assessing the toxicological potential of the
substance. Similar findings were obtained in a study with Sprague Dawlay rats, which were fed 0.5%
caffeine (Gans, 1984). However, no data were given about the group size, surviving animals and the
number of rats with testicular atrophy.
In contrast, testicular findings were not observed histopathologically in well documented subchronic studies
in rats and mice (see 3.1.5).
Conclusion:
In summary in several well documented studies, caffeine resulted in slight reproductive effects at high doses
(e.g. reduced number of pups born alive per litter) occurring in the presence of general toxicity (body
weight gain) in parental rats and mice.
In well documented 90 day-studies performed in rats and mice, no significant differences in sperm
morphology, vaginal cytology and histopathology of the gonads were seen (see 3.1.5.).
30 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
Developmental effects were studied in female Osborne-Mendel rats treated on days 0 to 20 of gestation.
The substance was administered in the drinking water at concentrations of 70, 180, 360, 700, 1000, 1500,
and 2000 ppm. The corresponding daily caffeine intake were ca. 10, 27, 51, 87, 116, 160, and 205
mg/kg bw/d. Sacrifice of the dams and examination of the pups was made on day 20 of gestation.
Decreased maternal food and water consumption and significantly decreased maternal body weight gain
[by 8% (700 ppm), 25% (1000 ppm), 50% (1500 ppm) and 71% (2000 ppm)] were observed. At 1500
and 2000 ppm, decreased implantation efficiency, increased resorptions, and decreased mean number of
viable fetuses were noted. The number of runts was increased at 1000 ppm and higher. Decreased fetal
weight and length, and an increased incidence of edematous fetuses were observed at 700 ppm and higher.
Variations in the form of sternebral ossification deficiencies were increased at all dose levels except at 70
ppm, and in the form of skeletal ossification deficiencies in a dose-related manner from 700 ppm and
higher. No teratogenic effect was found (Collins et al., 1983).
NOAEL maternal toxicity: 360 ppm (ca. 51 mg/kg bw/d)
fetotoxicity : 70 ppm (ca. 10 mg/kg bw/d)
teratogenicity : 2000 ppm (> 205 mg/kg bw/d)
Similar results were obtained in a drinking water and a gavage study with Osborn-Mendel rats (Collins et
al. 1981 and 1987). In the drinking water study body weight depressions as well as skeletal retardations in
fetuses were observed in doses of 360 ppm and higher. In the gavage study a teratogenic effect was found
in higher maternally toxic doses (80 mg/kg bw and higher).
In two NTP studies, CD rats were administered the test substance by gavage.
Administration of 0, 40, and 80 mg/kg bw/d on gestation days 1 to 19 to groups of 20 rats (developmental
evaluation on gestation day 20) resulted in maternal toxicity indicated by signficantly reduced maternal
weight gain in all treated groups (35% and 43% resp.). Fetal weight was significant reduced (13%) at the
high dose level. The number of implantation sites, the percent of live fetuses/litter and the number of
resorption and dead fetuses were not affected. No increase in the rate of external, visceral, or skeletal
malformations was seen (NTP, 1984c).
LOAEL: 40 mg/kg bw/d (maternal toxicity)
NOAEL: = 40 mg/kg bw/d (fetotoxicity)
NOAEL: = 80 mg/kg bw/d (teratogenicity)
In the second study groups of 12 dams were administered 0, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg bw/d of the substance
on gestation days 1 to 20 and were allowed to deliver. The pups were subsequently evaluated for postnatal
growth and several functional parameters. No adverse effects on offspring physical development,
behaviour or cardiovascular function were observed, although maternal body weight gain was significantly
reduced in all treated rats (14%, 12% and 18% resp.) (NTP, 1984c).
LOAEL: 10 mg/kg bw/d (maternal toxicity)
NOAEL: = 40 mg/kg bw/d (fetotoxicity)
NOAEL: = 40 mg/kg bw/d (teratogenicity)
Several studies were performed to assess reproductive and/or developmental toxicity with brewed or
instant coffee. In these studies the animals received coffee as their drinking fluid, which yielded doses of
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 31
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
caffeine of ca. 38-80 mg/kg. In all studies with the exception of one (see below), no teratogenic effects
were found. In some cases delayed ossification of the sternebrae was observed. In more recent guideline -
like studies where rats were treated with higher doses of caffeine, these findings (malformations) could not
be confirmed (see below).
In this older study with rats, malformations were observed. Namely, in a combined subchronic,
reproductive, developmental study with freshly percolated coffee in drinking water (9, 19, 39 mg/kg bw/d)
or when caffeine was administered by gavage or in drinking water (30 mg/kg bw/d), cleft palates and
delayed ossifications were observed, however these findings were not dose-dependent. For coffee intake
of 0%, 12.5%, 25% and 50% the number of observed fetuses with cleft palates were 1/423; 8/207;
5/225; 4/229, and for caffeine gavage intake 1/252, and caffeine in drinking water 2/245, only. Delayed
ossification was found after coffee intake in 0/256; 8/128; 62/141; 11/148 and after caffeine intake in
12/171 and 15/160 animals respectively. The animals received coffee or caffeine before mating, throughout
gestation and up to 27 days after parturition. Effects on fertility, litter size and neonatal growth were not
observed. No information about maternal toxicity was given in the report (Palm et al., 1978). The fact that
these results were not dose-dependent calls into question their relevance. In several studies performed in
mice caffeine was given either once by i.p. injection, by feed (in pellets) or via drinking water. Cleft palats
were observed in the i.p. and feeding study, but not in the drinking water study. It is worth noting that feed
and water study were parallel studies using the same dose. It is known from literature (Schwetz et al.1977,
Beyer and Chernoff, 1986) that in this specie s stress (caffeine is a sympathomometic), or a decrease in
water intake during gestation may induce this type of malformation. Therefore, no mouse study was chosen
as a key study.
A behavioral study was performed with forty adult monkeys which were administered caffeine in drinking
water at concentrations of 0.15 and 0.35 mg/ml (ca. 10-15 and 25-30 mg/kg bw/d) before, during and
after pregnancy.
Previously reported results indicated that exposure to caffeine resulted in a dose-related increase in
reproductive failure (stillbirths, miscarriages) and decreased maternal weight gain and decreased infant birth
weight. These results may be the consequence of elevated serum levels of not only caffeine but also its
pharmacologically active metabolite theophylline, which is the major metabolite in monkey but not in
human.
Analysis of blood and 24-hour urine samples (collected every 2 weeks) revealed a number of both
pregnancy and treatment-related effects: decreased levels of serum cholesterol and triglyceride during
pregnancy in all groups (pregnancy-related), increased levels of serum and urine creatinine in the treated
groups (substance-related), unaltered serum glucose levels in the high dose group (substance-related, this
value usually declines during pregnancy), and depressed levels of serum estrogen in the high dose group
(substance-related).
According to the authors, these findings indicated that the test substance may influence maternal physiology
during gestation in the monkey.
Additionally, the somatic development (like body weight, tooth eruption, skelettal development and
measures etc.) of the infants was monitored. Maternal blood and milk concentrations of the test substance
were similar to infant blood concentrations.
Infant body weights and somatic measurements (like bone and head lengths), were reduced over the first
30 days in males. The deficits were reversible and not evident after one year of age. Tooth eruption and
milk consumption were not affected. According to the authors, this indicated that caffeine can alter infant
somatic development (treated monkeys were significant smaller than controls) when consumed during
pregnancy.
Behavioral tests were conducted in the infants. At 30 days of age, the infants were trained to press a button
to receive a reward (infant formula). Thereafter, a variable number of button presses (variable ratio
32 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
schedule) were required to get formula. Monitoring of feeding time revealed that the treated infants spent
significantly more time feeding than controls. On the variable ratio schedule, the high-dose group had
consistently longer pause times and longer interresponses than controls. According to the authors, these
results indicated that in utero exposure to caffeine and its metabolites resulted in altered behavioral patterns
in infant monkeys (Gilbert and Rice, 1991a/b, 1994).
There were further developmental neurotoxicology studies, mostly performed in rats. However, according
to IARC monograph Vol 51(1991), these studies were reviewed and the effects observed were no t
consistent across the studies. Thus, it was concluded by IARC that caffeine may cause subtile changes in
discrete neuronal subsystems but has not to be regarded to be a neurotoxicant in the sense of disrupting
primary neuronal systems."
Conclusion:
In maternally nontoxic doses no teratogenic effect was observed in several studies with rats. Slight
fetotoxicity was observed in the rat study in the absence of maternal toxicity.
In summary, animal studies demonstrate that high bolus-doses of caffeine can result in gross malformations
and resorptions, while prolonged sipping or infusion of the same total dosage during organogenesis caused
only reversible delays in growth. The consideration of pharmacokinetic data is essential for appropriate
intra-species and interspecies risk extrapolation. Animal data indicate that the probable blood level of
caffeine required to produce teratogenic effects is in excess of 60 g/ml. This blood level can only be
reached in rodents as short-term peak concentrations by administration of large bolus dosages (gavage) in
amounts exceeding 40-60 mg/kg bw/d. It can also be assumed that this would correspond to 800 mg/kg
bw/d of caffeine given to rats in the drinking water. Using this hypothetical data, an 800 mg/kg bw/d
dosage of caffeine would require a 70 kg human to consume about 50 g of caffeine within a short time
period. This cannot be achieved by consuming usual caffeine-containing drinks over several hours (both in
human and animal) (Christian and Brent, 2001).
Christian and Brent (2001) concluded, that pregnant women, who do not smoke or drink alcohol and who
consume moderate amounts of caffeine (<5-6 mg/kg bw/d spread throughout the day) do not have an
increased risk of reproductive effects.
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 33
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
4 Hazards to the environment
The following acute toxicity test results with aquatic organisms are available:
All effect values are related to nominal concentrations. In the alga test the test substance concentration was
monitored by HPLC. The measured concentrations were between 96.5 and 105.8 % of the nominal values
and the results were related to nominal concentrations.
Based on the most sensitive data, Leuciscus idus LC50(96h) 87 mg/l, a PNEC for the aquatic
compartment of 0.087 mg/l can be derived by applying an assessment factor of 1000, according to the
Technical Guidance Document for the EU risk assessment procedure.
In a non-standard study the effect of caffeine on rice seedlings was investigated over a 6 day period.
0.5 10 mM caffeine inhibited the growth dose-dependently. Shoot elongation was inhibited by 50 % with
2.5 mM caffeine (485 mg), whereas root elongation was inhibited by 80 % with one treatment at the same
concentration (Smyth, 1992). As the tests were performed without soil but with filter paper, the results
cannot be used for the derivation of a PNECsoil.
The LD50 for red flour beetle, exposed to flour medium treated with caffeine, was 288 mg/kg for adults
and 251 mg/kg for larvae (Mondal et al., 1992).
Investigations with red-winged blackbirds and starlings showed LD50 values of 316 mg/kg BW and >500
mg/kg BW respectively (Schafer et al., 1983).
34 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5 Conclusions and Recommendations
5.1 Conclusions
In 1999 the estimated world production amounts to 10,000 15,000 tons including 3,000 to 4,000 tons
of natural caffeine. Worldwide, there are 18 production sites known for the technical product caffeine and
about 7 to 8 for natural caffeine.
The substance is predominantly used in the food (80 %) and pharma sector (16 %). A smaller part is used
in cosmetics (3 %) and in technical applications (1 %).
Releases into the environment may occur during production of caffeine, during formulation and use of food
and pharmaceuticals.
Measured data on emission into the atmosphere or into surface water via waste water treatment plants are
not available.
According to a Mackay I model the target compartment for the substance is the hydrosphere with 99.99
%.
Caffeine can be regarded as readily biodegradable. Hydrolysis is not expected to occur. In the atmosphere
the substance will be photodegraded by reaction with hydroxyl radicals with an estimated half-life of 19.8
h. The substance has no potential for bio- or geoaccumulation.
Short-term tests are available for fish, daphnia and algae. Based on acute toxicity studies caffeine can be
considered as harmful to aquatic organisms. Following the EU risk assessment procedure the PNEC for
the aquatic compartment can be calculated to 0.087 mg/l by applying an assessment factor of 1000 on the
most sensitive species ( Leuciscus idus LC50(96h) 87 mg/l).
In animals studies caffeine showed moderate toxicity after oral uptake and inhalation and a low acute
toxicity after dermal treatment.
LD50 rat oral: 261-383 mg/kg, LC50 rat inhalative: ca. 4.94 mg/l/4h; LD50 rat dermal: > 2000 mg/kg)
The undiluted substance was not irritating to the eyes of rabbits; the substance in a 50% aqueous dilution
was not irritating to the skin of rabbits.
In a 90-day-drinking water study in rats and mice a slight decrease of body weight gain was observed. No
clinical signs of toxicity or significant gross lesion were seen in either rats and mice. The NOAEL for rats
was 1500 ppm (ca. 151 - 174 mg/kg bw/day) and for mice 1500 ppm (ca. 167-179 mg/kg bw/day).
There are numerous studies available concerning genetic toxicity in vitro and in vivo. Collectively the results
indicate no evidence of mutagenic effects. The weakly positive result reported in one micronucleus study
with mice has so far not been confirmed.
There was no statistically significant increase in the tumor incidence in treated animals as compared to
controls even at doses exceeding the maximum tolerated dose and given to rats over a major portion of
their lifespan.
Caffeine resulted in reproductive effects occurring in the presence of general toxicity in parental rats and
mice. A NOAEL in rats was not established. NOAEL: mouse 22 mg/kg bw/d (F0 parental, F1 offspring),
88 mg/kg bw/d (F1 parental, F2 offspring).
No teratogenic effects were observed in several studies in rats. Fetotoxicity without maternal toxicity was
observed in one study. NOAEL: 360 ppm (51 mg/kg bw/d) (maternal), 70 ppm (10 mg/kg bw/d)
(fetotoxicity), 2000 ppm (205 mg/kg bw/d) (teratogenicity). However, in two other studies this finding was
not confirmed. No NOAEL for maternal toxicity could be established; the NOAEL for developmental
toxicity was 40 mg/kg bw/d; no teratogenic effects were observed.
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 35
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
Absorption from gastrointestinal tract is rapid. Peak plasma levels are reached after 15 to 120 minutes
after ingestion. The elimination half-life in adults is about 2.5 to 4.5 hours. A small percentage is excreted in
bile, salvia, semen and breast milk. In both humans and rats, excretion mainly occures via urine (about 90
% dose in rats; > 95 % in humans).
Caffeine metabolism is qualitatively relatively similar in animals and humans. The main metabolic pathways
are: demethylation and hydroxylation of the 8-position leading to the formation of the respective uracil and
uric acid derivatives. There are, however, some quantitative differences in the metabolic profile.
Low doses (up to 2 g/ml in blood) stimulate the central nervous system, while high blood concentrations
(10-30 g/ml) produce restlessness, excitement, tremor, tinnitus, headache, and insomnia. Caffeine can
induce alterations in mood and sleep patterns, increase diuresis and gastric secretions. Acute toxicity is rare
and is the result of an overdose. Lethal dose is estimated to be 5 g.
Caffeine and coffee consumption are highly correlated in most populations studied; thus it is difficult to
separate the two exposures in epidemiologic investigations. No association between moderate
consumption of coffee/caffeine and cardiovascular diseases was demonstrated in more recent studies. In
short-term clinical trials an increase in blood pressure was seen, whereas in other surveys no relationship
between caffeine consumption and elevation of blood pressure was observed. Caffeine consumed in
moderate amounts did not cause persistent increase in blood pressure in normotensive subjects. Effect on
cardiac rhythm is still in debate. Small increase in calcium excretion associated with coffee/caffeine intake
was seen in subjects with dietary calcium deficiency. Caffeine has weak reinforced properties, but with little
or no evidence for upward dose adjustment, possibly because of the adverse effects of higher doses.
Withdrawal symptoms, although relatively limited with respect to severity, do occur, and may contribute to
maintenance of caffeine consumption. Caffeine use is not associated with incapacitation. There is little
evidence for an association of caffeine intake and benign breast disease. No association was found in a
study with biopsy-confirmed controls.
A cohort study with short follow-up period showed no association between caffeine consumption and
mortality from cancers at all sites. Case control studies of breast cancer showed no association to caffeine
intake. Available data are consistent with a weak association between bladder cancer and caffeine intake,
but the possibility that this is due to bias or confounding cannot be excluded. Effect of coffee consumption
on colon and pancreas is in debate.
There are conflicting reports on the effect of caffeine on human reproduction. A teratogenic effect has not
been proven. While caffeine intake up to 3-4 cups/day or 300 mg caffeine/day is unlikely to be causally
related to spontaneous abortions or relevant reduction of birth weight, an association between higher daily
caffeine intake and these endpoints can not be excluded. Conflicting results exist regarding a potential
relationship between caffeine/coffee consumption and delayed conception or infertility.
Risk characterization:
Caffeine is listed in GRAS Food Substances. The tolerance in foods is 0.02%. The substance is generally
recognized as safe when used in cola-type beverages in accordance with good manufacturing practice
(Code of Federal Regulations Title 21-Food and drugs revised as of April 1, 2001)
Caffeine in pharmaceutical use is described in specific regulation.
36 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
Workplace:
Taking worst case assumptions, the maximum exposure of workers during the filter changes is 1.2mg/m3.
Considering this high exposure, which is unrealistical for 8 hours, the maximum uptake (absorption: 100 %;
ventilation rate: 1.8 m3 / h) is 17.28 mg/person (ca. 0.3 mg/kg bw/day).
With respect to the NOAEL in subchronic studies - NOAEL for rats was 1500 ppm (ca. 150 - 174
mg/kg bw/day) and for mice 1500 ppm (ca. 167-179 mg/kg bw/day) - there are safety factors of 500 an
higher.
NOAELs for developmental toxicity, the most sensitive endpoint are: NOAEL: 360 ppm (51 mg/kg bw/d)
(maternal toxicity), 70 ppm (10 mg/kg bw/d) (fetotoxicity), 2000 ppm (205 mg/kg bw/d) (teratogenicity).
Even under this worst case assumption, there is still a safety factor of 33 for fetotoxicity. This safety factor
is substantiated by a new publication of Christian and Brent, 2001 in which up to 5 6 mg/kg caffeine
uptake per day is regarded to have no reproductive risk for humans.
5.2 Recommendations
Environment: No recommendation for further work, as the substance is readily biodegradable, has a low
bioaccumulation potential and is only moderately toxic to aquatic organisms.
Human Health: No recommendation for further work for the following reasons:
The pharmacological properties of caffeine are well known. There are many studies relevant to
reproductive toxicity; some suggest an adverse effect but the total data base is inconsistent. The case of
caffeine is regulated by food and drug agencies of national governments.
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 37
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
6 REFERENCES
Abernethy D.R., Todd E.L., Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 28, 425-428, (1985)
Armstrong B.G., et al., Am. J. Public Health, 82, 85-87, (1992); cited in: Fernandes et al., 1998
Arnaud M.J., in: Garattini S. (ed.), Caffeine, Coffee, and Health (1993)
Arnaud M.J., Welsch C., in: Rietbrock N., et al., al., (eds.), Methods in Clinical Pharmacology, No. 3,
Vieweg, Braunschweig, 135-148, (1982)
BASF AG, department of toxikology, unpublished data, (85/209), 10-07-85 (BASF AG 1985a)
BASF AG, department of toxikology, unpublished data, (85/209), 10-17-85 (BASF AG 1985b)
BASF AG, department of physical chemistry, report UV-12.88, 10-14-88 (BASF AG 1988a)
BASF AG, department of toxikology, unpublished data, (88/208), 1-25-89 (BASF AG 1988b)
BASF AG, department of ecology, unpublished data (0288/88), 03-30-88 (BASF AG 1988c)
BASF AG, department of toxikology, unpublished data, (88/333), 7-18-88 (BASF AG 1988d)
BASF AG, department of ecology, unpublished data (1313/89), 12-21-89 (BASF AG 1989a)
BASF AG, department of toxikology, unpublished data, (88/333), 6-29-89 (BASF AG 1989b)
BASF AG, Department of product safety, regulations, toxicology and ecology, unpublished data
38 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
(00/0360/21/1), 10-31-00 (BASF AG 2000b)
BASF AG, Safety data sheet Coffein Wfr. Gr. Plv. 1A001BK1 (07.06.2001) (BASF AG 2001a)
BASF AG, Department of Product Safety, unpublished data (00/0359/60/1), 03-28-01 (BASF AG
2001b)
BASF AG, Department of Product Safety, personal communication, 08-31-01 (BASF AG 2001c)
Beach C.A., et al., Proc. West. Pharmacol. Soc., 25, 377-380, (1982)
Bernstein G.A., et al., J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Pschiatry, 37 (8), 858-865, (1998)
Beyer P.E. and N. Chernoff, Teratogenesis, Carcinogenesis, and Mutagenesis 6: 419-429, (1986)
Blanchard J., Sawers S.J.A., Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 24, 93-98, (1983)
Bonati M., Garattini S., in: Des P.B., (ed.), Caffeine, Springer, Berlin, 48-56, (1984)
Caan B., et al., al., Am. J. Public Health, 88 (2), 270-274, (1998)
Cipriani F. and Geddes, M, Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita 32 (4), 57 3-5 93 (1996)
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 39
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 72nd ed, Boca Raton, CRC press, (Lide, D.R. (ed.) p. 3-
158) (1991-1992)
Dominguez-Rojas V., et al., Eur. J. Epidemiol., 10-665-668, (1994); cited in: Fernandes et al., 1998
Eddy N.E., Downs A.W., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 33, 167-174, (1928)
Final Report, NCTR Techn. Rep. for Expt. No. 384 (NTP Expt. No. 05011-04) (1983b)
FitzSimmons C.R., Kidner N., J. Accid. Emerg. Med., 15, 196-197, (1998)
Gabridge M.G. and M.S. Legator, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 130, 831-834, (1969)
Gilbert R.M., in: Gibbins A.J. et al., al., (eds.),Wiley, New York, Vol. 3, 49-176, (1976)
Gilbert S.G. and D.C. Rice, Fund. Appl. Toxicol., 16, 299-308, (1991a)
Gilbert S.G. and D.C. Rice, Fund. Appl. Toxicol., 17, 454-465, (1991b)
Gilbert S.G. and D.C. Rice, Fund. Appl. Toxicol., 22, 41-50, (1994)
40 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
Griffths R.R., Mumford G.K., in: Psychopharmacology, Bloom F.E., Kupfer D.J., (eds.), Raven Press,
New York, 1699-1713, (1995)
Harris S.S., Dawson-Hughes B., Am. i. Clin. Nutr., 60, 573-578, (1994)
Hart C., Smith G.D., J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health, 51, 461-462, (1997)
Heinonen O.P., Birth defects and drugs in pregnancy, Littleton, MA Publ., Sci., cited in: IARC, 1991
Henkel KgaA, department of ecology, unpublished report no. R9701360 for BASF AG; 5-23-00
Hennekens C.H., et al., New Engl. J. Med., 294 (12), 633-636, (1976)
IARC, Mono graph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, Lyon, Vol. 51, (1991)
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 41
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
Krantz J.C.Jr., Carr C.F., Pharmacologic Principles in Medical Practice, Williams, Baltimore, 5th ed.,
725-755, (1961)
Levinson W., Dunn P.M., Arch. Intern. Med. 146, 1773-1775, (1986)
Lubin F., et al., J. Am. Med. Assoc., 253 (16), 2388-2392, (1985)
42 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
Martin T.R., Bracken M.B., Am. J. Epidemiol., 126 (5), 813-821, (1987)
McDonald A.D., et al., Am J. Public Health, 87-92, (1992); cited in: Fernandes et al., 1998
Nehlig A., Debry G., World Rev. Nutr. Diet., 76, 185-221, (1996)
NTP (National Center for Toxicologial Research): Acute Toxicity Report on Caffeine, Final Report,
NCTR Techn. Rep. for Expt. No. 374 (NTP Expt. No. 0501102) (1982a)
NTP (National Center for Toxicologial Research): Acute Toxicity Report on Caffeine, Final Report,
NCTR Techn. Rep. for Expt. No. 365 (NTP Expt. No. 0501101) (1982b)
NTP (National Center for Toxicologial Research): 90 Day Subchronic Report On Caffeine in Fischer
344 Rats, 90 Day Subchronic Report On Caffeine in B6C3F1 Mice , Final Reports, NCTR Techn.
Rep. for Expt. No. 384 (NTP Expt. No. 05011-04) (1983)
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 43
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
NTP (National Center for Toxicologial Research): Reproduction and Fertility Assessment in CD-1
Mice when administered in drinking water, Final Report, NTIS PB85-205052, (1984a)
NTP (National Center for Toxicologial Research): Reproduction and Fertility Assessment in CD-1
Mice when administered in drinking water, Final Report, NTIS PB85-101202, (1984b)
NTP (National Center for Toxicologial Research): Postnatal Evaluation of Behaviour and
Cardiovascular Function in Rats Following Daily Oral Caffeine Dosing of Dams Throughout Gestation,
Final Report, NCTR Techn. Rep. for Expt. No. 6189 (1984c)
NTP (National Center for Toxicologial Research): Final Report on the Reproductive Toxcity of
Caffeine (CAS No. 58-08-2) Administered by Gavage to Sprague-Dawley Rats, RACB94006, NTIS
PB86-211743, (July 1996)
Parsons W.D., Neims A.H., Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 24, 40-45, (1978)
Phillips-Bute B.G., Lane J.D., Phsiologiy & Behavior, 63, 35-39, (1998)
Pollard I. and S. Williamson, S. Magre, J. Deve lop. Physiology, 13, 59-65, (1990)
44 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
Robertson D., et al., New Engl. J. Med., 298 (4), 181-186, (1978)
Rodopoulos N., Norman A., Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest., 56, 259-268, (1996)
Schafer, E.W.. et al., Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 12(3), 355-382 (1983)
Sicard B.A., et al., Aviat. Space Environ. Med., 67, 859-862, (1996)
Srisuphan W., Bracken M. B., Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 154, 14-20, (1986)
Stanton C.K., Gray R.H., Am. J. Epidemiol., 142 (12), 1322-1329, (1995)
Statland B.E., et al., New Engl. J. Med., 295 (2), 110-111, (1976)
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 45
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
The Merck Index, 11. Ed. Rahway, Merck & Co, (Budavari, S. ed. P. 248) (1989)
van Dusseldorp M., et al., Am. J. Epidemiol., 132 (1), 33-40, (1990)
Welin L., et al., in: MacMahon B., Sugimura T., (eds.) Banbury Report 17, Cold Spring Harbor Lab.,
219-229, (1984)
Willett W.C., et al., J. Am. Med. Assoc., 275 (6), 458-462, (1996)
46 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
Date of the literature search (Januar 07, 2000)
Date of last literature search: June 05, 2001
Toxicology
JETOC
RTECS
AGRICOLA
CABA
CANCERLIT
TOXCENTER
TOXLINE
JICST-EPLUS
LIFESCI
TOXLIT
EMBASE
ESBIOBASE
EMBAL
HEALSAFE
CSNB
MEDLINE
IRIS
ATSDR TOX. PROFILES
ATSDR TOX: FAQS
CHEMFINDER
CIVS
GESTIS
GINC
NICNAS
NTP
Oecology
AQUASCI
BIOSIS
EMBASE
ESBIOBASE.
LIFESCI
OCEAN
POLLUAB
SCISEARCH
TOXCENTER
TOXLINE
ULIDAT
DATALOG
CHEMFATE
BIODEG
AQUIRE
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 47
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
HSDB
48 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
I U C L I D D a t a S e t
Memo: master
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 49
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
1. GENERAL INFORMATION DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Remark: USP grade with the specification to contain not less than
98.5 and not more than 101% of the ingredient calculated on an
anhydrous basis
Source: Knoll AG Ludwigshafen
Flag: non confidential, Critical study for SIDS endpoint
17-JAN-2003 (1)
50 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
1. GENERAL INFORMATION DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Colour: white
Odour: almost odourless
1.1.2 Spectra
1,3,7-Trimethyl-2,6-dioxopurine
1,3,7-trimethyl-2,6-dioxopurine
1,3,7-Trimethylxanthine
1,3,7-trimethylxanthine
3,7-Dihydro-1,3,7-trimethyl-1H-purine-2,6-dione
7-Methyltheophylline
Anhydrous caffeine
Cafeina
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 51
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
1. GENERAL INFORMATION DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Caffein
Caffeine (8CI)
Coffein, wasserfrei
Coffeinum
Guaranine
guaranine
Koffein
Mateina
Methyltheobromine
Methyltheothylline
Thein
52 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
1. GENERAL INFORMATION DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Theine
1.3 Impurities
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 53
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
1. GENERAL INFORMATION DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
1.4 Additives
1.6.1 Labelling
1.6.2 Classification
1.6.3 Packaging
Type: type
Category: Wide dispersive use
Type: industrial
Category: other
54 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
1. GENERAL INFORMATION DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 55
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
1. GENERAL INFORMATION DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Type: use
Category: Cosmetics
Type: use
Category: Food/foodstuff additives
Type: use
Category: Pharmaceuticals
56 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
1. GENERAL INFORMATION DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 57
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
1. GENERAL INFORMATION DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Type: EINECS
Additional Info: EINECS-No. 200-362-1
Type: ENCS
Additional Info: ENCS No. 9-419
Type: ECL
Additional Info: ECL Serial No. KE-10766
Type: TSCA
Type: DSL
58 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
1. GENERAL INFORMATION DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Type: AICS
Type: PICCS
1.9.2 Components
07-FEB-2003
1.13 Reviews
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 59
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
2. PHYSICO-CHEMICAL DATA DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Method: other
60 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
2. PHYSICO-CHEMICAL DATA DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Decomposition: no
Method: other
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 61
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
2. PHYSICO-CHEMICAL DATA DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
2.3 Density
Type: density
Value: = 1.23 g/cm
2.3.1 Granulometry
67/548/EWG
GLP: no
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 63
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
2. PHYSICO-CHEMICAL DATA DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
GLP: no
64 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
2. PHYSICO-CHEMICAL DATA DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 65
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
2. PHYSICO-CHEMICAL DATA DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Value:
2.9 Flammability
Result: other
2.13 Viscosity
66 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
2. PHYSICO-CHEMICAL DATA DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Result: Solubility:
freely soluble: pyrrole, tetrahydrofurene containing about
4 % water
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 67
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
2. PHYSICO-CHEMICAL DATA DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
68 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
3. ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND PATHWAYS DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
3.1.1 Photodegradation
Type: air
INDIRECT PHOTOLYSIS
Sensitizer: OH
Conc. of sens.: 500000 molecule/cm
Rate constant: .0000000000194185 cm/(molecule * sec)
Degradation: 50 % after 19.8 hour(s)
Type: air
INDIRECT PHOTOLYSIS
Sensitizer: OH
Conc. of sens.: 500000 molecule/cm
Rate constant: .000000000152 cm/(molecule * sec)
Degradation: 50 % after 2.5 hour(s)
Type: abiotic
t1/2 pH : > 1 year
Result: The estimated half-life was 0.8 days in the Rhine river,
which was thought to occur as a result of biological
removal processes.
Reliability: (2) valid with restrictions
acceptable publication which meets basic scientific
principles
07-JUN-2001 (26)
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 69
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
3. ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND PATHWAYS DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
70 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
3. ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND PATHWAYS DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Medium: other
Type: adsorption
Media: water - soil
Method: other: calculated with PCKOCWIN, vers. 1.63
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 71
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
3. ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND PATHWAYS DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
28-JAN-2003 (15)
Type: volatility
Media: water - air
Type: adsorption
Media: soil - air
Type: adsorption
Media: water - soil
3.3.2 Distribution
Calculation basis:
water solubility: 20000 g/m3
Vp: 4.70E-6
log Kow -0.09
T: 20 C
Reliability: (2) valid with restrictions
accepted calculation method
Flag: Critical study for SIDS endpoint
28-JAN-2003 (15) (36)
72 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
3. ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND PATHWAYS DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
3.5 Biodegradation
Type: aerobic
Inoculum: other: activated sludge from laboratory waste water plants
treating municipal sewage
Concentration: 43 mg/l related to Test substance
20 mg/l related to DOC (Dissolved Organic Carbon)
Degradation: > 90 - 100 % after 22 day(s)
Result: readily biodegradable
Type: aerobic
Degradation: 71 % after 28 day(s)
Result: readily biodegradable
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 73
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
3. ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND PATHWAYS DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Type: aerobic
Result: readily biodegradable
Method: other
Year: 1981
74 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
3. ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND PATHWAYS DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
3.7 Bioaccumulation
Result: estimated
Reliability: (2) valid with restrictions
accepted calculation method
04-JUL-2001 (41) (16) (17)
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 75
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
4. ECOTOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
AQUATIC ORGANISMS
Type: static
Species: Leuciscus idus (Fish, fresh water)
Exposure period: 96 hour(s)
Unit: mg/l Analytical monitoring: no
NOEC: = 46
LC0: = 46
LC50: ca. 87
LC100: = 215
Type: static
Species: Pimephales promelas (Fish, fresh water)
Exposure period: 120 hour(s)
Unit: mg/l Analytical monitoring: no data
LC50: 720
76 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
4. ECOTOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 77
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
4. ECOTOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
78 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
4. ECOTOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
test item.
Reliability: (1) valid without restriction
guideline study
28-AUG-2002 (46)
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 79
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
4. ECOTOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Type: aquatic
Species: Pseudomonas putida (Bacteria)
Exposure period: 17 hour(s)
Unit: mg/l Analytical monitoring: no
EC10: = 1530
EC50: = 3490
EC90 : = 5240
80 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
4. ECOTOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
28-JAN-2003 (48)
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 81
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
4. ECOTOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Type: other
Species: Photobacterium phosphoreum (Bacteria)
Exposure period: 5 minute(s)
Unit: mg/l Analytical monitoring:
EC50: 603 - 707
Method: other
82 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
4. ECOTOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
TERRESTRIAL ORGANISMS
Method: other
Test substance: no data
Method: other
Test substance: as prescribed by 1.1 - 1.4
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 83
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
4. ECOTOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
84 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
4. ECOTOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Method: other
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 85
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
4. ECOTOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
86 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
4. ECOTOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Remark: The highest concentration of the tested 0.04, 0.2 and 1.0
mg/ml of caffeine induced aneuploidy in a short-term
hexoploid wheat assay
06-NOV-2000 (55)
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 87
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Sex: male/female
Vehicle: water
Value: = 192 mg/kg bw
Method: other
Year: 1959
GLP: no
Test substance: other TS
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Sex: male
No. of Animals: 5
Vehicle: other: corn oil
Value: = 483 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Sex: male/female
Value: = 233 mg/kg bw
88 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 89
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Sex: male
Value: = 355 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Sex: female
Value: = 247 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Value: = 344 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Value: = 421 mg/kg bw
90 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Down method.
Test substance: caffeine
06-DEC-2001 (64)
Type: LD50
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 91
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Species: rat
Sex: male
Value: = 279 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Sex: male
No. of Animals: 10
Vehicle: other: gum arabic
Value: = 700 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Sex: male/female
Value: 50 - 500 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Sex: male/female
No. of Animals: 10
Vehicle: CMC
Value: 261 - 383 mg/kg bw
92 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 93
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Sex: male/female
No. of Animals: 12
Vehicle: other: Trioctanoin
Value: 200 - 400 mg/kg bw
Remark: LC50 was between 200 and 400 mg/kg for males and females.
Groups of 6 Fischer 344 rats/sex were administered the test
substance by gaveage at dose levels of 50, 100, 200, 400,
and 800 mg/kg.
The slope of the LC50 curve ws rather steep, especially for
males. LD10 was 220 mg/kg for males and 240 mg/kg for
females.
Test substance: caffeine; according to the authors, purity was 99.9+%
(analyzed)
Reliability: (1) valid without restriction
guideline study (NTP)
Flag: Critical study for SIDS endpoint
06-NOV-2002 (68)
94 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
1000, and 1500 mg/kg and was observed for 14 days. Deaths
occurred at doses of 450 mg/kg and more within the day of
dosing.
Test substance: caffeine; according to the authors, purity was >99%
06-DEC-2001 (60)
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 95
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Type: LD50
Species: mouse
Value: = 127 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: mouse
Sex: male/female
No. of Animals: 12
Vehicle: other: sodium benzoate
Value: = 185 mg/kg bw
Remark: LC50 = 185 mg/kg (males and females), 95% confidence limit =
100-240 mg/kg
Groups of 6 B6C3F1 mice/sex were administered the test
substance by gavage at dose levels of 125, 250, 500, 750,
and 1500 mg/kg.
LD10 was estimated to be 35 mg/kg for males and females.
Test substance: caffeine; according to the authors, purity was 99.9+%
(analyzed)
Reliability: (1) valid without restriction
guideline study (NTP)
Flag: Critical study for SIDS endpoint
06-NOV-2002 (70)
96 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
06-DEC-2001 (71)
Type: LD50
Species: rabbit
Value: = 224 mg/kg bw
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 97
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Species: rabbit
Value: = 246 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: dog
Value: = 140 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: guinea pig
Value: = 230 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: hamster
Value: = 230 mg/kg bw
98 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Type: LC50
Species: rat
Sex: male/female
No. of Animals: 10
Vehicle: other: aerosol
Exposure time: 4 hour(s)
Value: ca. 4.94 mg/l
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Sex: male/female
No. of Animals: 10
Vehicle: other: olive oil (50% suspension)
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 99
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Remark: Five male and five female Wistar rats were given a 24-h
semiocclusive application of a 50% (w/v) aqueous suspension
of the test substance (dose level: 2000 mg/kg). After 24 h,
the application patches were removed, and the application
sites were washed with water. No deaths, signs of toxicity,
or local/pathological findings were observed within the
14-day observation period.
Test substance: caffeine (anhydrous powder)
Reliability: (2) valid with restrictions
comparable to guideline study
Flag: Critical study for SIDS endpoint
24-JUL-2002 (76)
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Route of admin.: i.p.
Value: = 200 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Route of admin.: i.p.
Value: = 240 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Route of admin.: i.p.
Value: 200 - 205 mg/kg bw
29-AUG-2000 (78)
Type: LD50
Species: mouse
Route of admin.: i.p.
Value: = 168 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: guinea pig
Route of admin.: i.p.
Value: = 235 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Route of admin.: s.c.
Value: = 170 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: mouse
Route of admin.: s.c.
Value: = 242 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: dog
Route of admin.: s.c.
Value: = 100 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: rat
Route of admin.: i.v.
Type: LD50
Species: mouse
Route of admin.: i.v.
Value: = 100 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: mouse
Route of admin.: i.v.
Value: = 62 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: rabbit
Route of admin.: i.v.
Value: = 78 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: dog
Route of admin.: i.v.
Value: = 175 mg/kg bw
Type: LD50
Species: guinea pig
Species: rabbit
Concentration: 50 %
Exposure: Semiocclusive
Exposure Time: 4 hour(s)
No. of Animals: 3
PDII: 0
Result: not irritating
EC classificat.: not irritating
Remark: Two male and one female White Vienna rabbits were applied
ca. 500 mg of the test substance (a 50% (w/w) aqueous
formulation) for 4 hours under semiocclusive conditions.
After 4 hours, the application patches were removed, and the
application sites were washed with water and Lutrol/water
(1/1). The skin was scored at 30-60 minutes after removal of
the patches and at 24, 48, and 72 h. No signs of irritation
were observed; irritation indices (erythema and edema) were
0 in each animal at each reading time.
Reliability: (1) valid without restriction
guideline study (OECD)
Flag: Critical study for SIDS endpoint
06-DEC-2001 (85)
Species: rabbit
Concentration: undiluted
Dose: .1 ml
Comment: not rinsed
No. of Animals: 3
Result: not irritating
EC classificat.: not irritating
Year: 1981
GLP: no
Test substance: as prescribed by 1.1 - 1.4
Remark: One tenth millilitre (bulk volume; ca. 56 mg) of the test
substance was instilled into the right conjunctival sac of
each of 2 male and 1 female White Vienna rabbits. The
treated eyes were not washed. The eyes were scored at 1, 24,
48, and 72 h and at 8 days post instillation. Slight corneal
opacity was found in asll 3 rabbits at 24h and in 1 rabbit at
day 8. Slight to well-defined conjunctival redness was present
in all 3 rabbits at 24h (grad 2) and in 1 rabbit at day 8;
slight to moderate conjunctival swelling
was found in 1 rabbits at up to 48 hours. No iritis was
observed. Mean irritation indices were 0.9 (corneal
opacity), 0.0 (iritis), 1.6 (conjunctival erythema), and 0.6
(conjunctival edema).
Reliability: (1) valid without restriction
guideline study (OECD)
Flag: Critical study for SIDS endpoint
08-JUL-2002 (85)
5.3 Sensitization
Strain: no data
Route of administration: oral feed
Exposure period: 1, 3, 6, 8 months
Frequency of treatment: continuously in the diet
Post exposure period: none
Doses: ca. 70, 140, 280 mg/kg/d(0.125, 0.25, 0.5% in the diet)
Control Group: yes, concurrent no treatment
NOAEL: ca. 70 mg/kg bw
Result: The effect of the test substance on the rat pancreas was
studied. Male adult rats were given drinking water
06-DEC-2001 (88)
Result: The aim of this study was to determine the dose levels for a
2-year chronic bioassay. Groups of 12 rats/sex were given
the test substance in the drinking water at concentrations
of 0 (control), 188, 375, 750, 1500, and 3000 ppm. According
to the authors, based on data of body weights and water
consumption, the daily doses were calculated to be 0, 19.7,
41.8, 85.4, 151.0, and 271.9 mg/kg for males and 0, 23.1,
51.0, 104.2, 174.2, and 287.0 mg/kg for females. All animals
were sacrificed at the end of the treatment period; body and
organ weights were recorded. Clinical chemical examinations
were performed on animals from the 188, 750, and 3000 ppm
and control groups. Microscopic pathology was performed on
all lesions appearing grossly and routinely in all major
systems in the high dose and control groups.
The body weight gains of all treated groups were decreased.
The effect was significant in the highest dose only (reduction
of 26%, males, 20%, females). Both food and water consumption
was decreased by ca. 10% in this group in both sexes. However,
water consumption was increased at 750 ppm (both sexes) and at
375 ppm (females). No significant clinical symptoms were
recorded in any group.
Clinical chemistry indicated some significantly increased
and/or decreased serum aspartate aminotransferase and
alanine aminotransferase values and significantly decreased
serum amylase values in treated rats; however, no
dose-related patterns were established.
There were no significant treatment-related gross lesions.
Microscopic examination revealed alterations (cell
enlargement) of the salivary gland which were most marked in
the high dose group, diminishing with decreasing dose.
The observed effect in salivary gland was dose dependent in
rats and mice in the highest dose group only, the authors gave
no description about adverse effect. These is a functional
adaptive and reversible effect of salivary glands to well
known pharmacological effect of caffeine (sympathicomimetic).
The morphological changes correlate to this function are so
fare not considered to be an adverse effect of the substance
According to the authors, these results indicated that the
maximum tolerated dose to be used for a 2-year chronic
Doses: 15, 31, 62, 123, 245 mg/kg/d (males); 20, 38, 80, 133,
285 mg/kg/d (females) (100, 200, 400, 800, 1600 ppm in
the drinking water)
Control Group: yes, concurrent no treatment
NOAEL: > 1500 ppm
Result: The aim of this study was to determine the dose levels for a
90-day study. Groups of 6 rats/sex were given the test
substance in the drinking water at concentrations of 0
(control), 100, 200, 400, 800, and 1600 ppm. According to
the authors, based on data of body weights and water
consumption the daily doses were calculated to be 0, 15, 31,
62, 123, and 245 mg/kg for males and 0, 20, 38 , 80, 122,
and 285 mg/kg for females.
No deaths occurred. Rough hair was seen in one male dosed
with 200 ppm (day 12); hunched posture was seen in a single
100-ppm female (day 7). No other clinical signs were noted.
Body weights and gross pathology r evealed no
substance-related effect. Microscopic examination of
controls and animals treated with 400 ppm and more revealed
some changes of the stomach, kidneys, lungs in individual
rats administered 800 or 1600 ppm. However, this was not
statistically significantly different from control; similar
lesions were also found in control rats.
According to the authors, these results suggested that there
were no significant dose-related lesions or toxic responses.
Based on these results, doses of 0, 188, 375, 750, 1500, and
3000 ppm were selected for the 90-day study.
Test condition: Groups of 6 animals/sex.
dose that produced no deaths was 110 mg/kg, the LD50 (100
days) was 150 mg/kg and the LD100 (100 days) was 191 mg/kg.
Doses in the order of the LD0 (i.e. 110 mg/kg) produced a
stressor reaction in the adrenal and thymus glands.
Changes in behavior, gastric ulcers, hypertrophic effects in
several organs but in general to normal appearance and no
changes in growth or eating and drinking habits were noted.
Doses in the order of the LD50 (i.e. 150 mg/kg) caused
polydypsia and diuresis and some degree of toxic nephritis
as well as changes in the liver and other organs.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (3) invalid
06-DEC-2001 (92)
Result: The aim of this study was to determine the dose levels for a
2-year chronic bioassay. Groups of 12 mice/sex were given
the test substance in the drinking water at concentrations
of 0 (control), 94, 188, 375, 750, and 1500 ppm. According
to the authors, based on data of body weights and water
consumption, the daily doses were calculated to be 0, 21.4,
43.6, 85.4, 103.5, and 167.4 mg/kg for males and 0, 24.6,
46.7, 87.9, 134.4, and 179.4 mg/kg for females. All animals
were sacrificed at the end of the treatment period; body and
organ weights were recorded.
Result: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of the
test substance on the tyroid. Groups of 20 Syrian golden
hamsters/sex were given tap water containing the test
substance at concentrations of 0 (control), 91.3, 274, and
822 ppm. Based on data on body weight and water consumption,
daily doses were calculated to 0, 9.0, 24.6, and 65.2 mg/kg
for males and 0, 14.7, 50.8, and 104.8 mg/kg for females.
After 3 months of treatment, groups of 10 animals/sex were
sacrificed and autopsied.
Caffeine in plasma (measured at 3 days, 3 weeks and 3
months) was higher in females than in males, due to higher
uptake. A transient, non-dose-related increase in mean
tri-iodothyronine was seen in mid and high dose males after
3 days of treatment. At later time points, the values were
similar in all groups. No treatment- related changes were
found in thyroxine (days 3, 24, and 91), and other clinical
chemical parameters (day 91), absolute and relative adrenal
weight, gross pathology and thyroid histopathology.
According to the authors, in conclusion, no signs of thyroid
toxicity of caffeine was seen in Syrian golden hamsters.
Test substance: caffeine, pure, natural (DAB)
06-DEC-2001 (98)
Result: negative
Remark: DNA repair test with and without metabolic activation with
S-9 mix prepared from liver homogenate of Aroclor-pretreated
Sprague-Dawley rats; endpoint: bacterial growth; MIC
(minimal inhibitory concentration) ranged between 187 and
1125 ug/plate. The test substance induced a nonraparable DNA
damage in Escherichia coli.
Results presented only in tabular form; no further data.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (3) invalid
documentation unsufficient
06-DEC-2001 (99)
Method: other: according to Maron, D.M. and Ames, B.N.: Mutat. Res.
113, 173-215
Year: 1984
GLP: no data
Test substance: other TS
Remark: The cells were incubated with the test substance for 60
minutes at 37 degree C. At least 4000 interphase cells with
visible cytoplasm per treatment were scored. A
dose-dependent increase in % cells with micronuclei was seen
(ca. 4.5% micronucleated cells at the highest dose level;
ca. 0.3% micronucleated cells in controls; result presented
graphically).
The test substance was slightly cytotoxic. At a
concentration of 10 mM, cell viability was 92.3% and 83.6%
of control after 0 and 3 days of incubation, respect ively.
At a concentration of 20 mM, cell viability was 83.5% and
06-DEC-2001 (113)
Method: other: according to Ames, B.N. et al.: Mutat. Res. 31, 347-364
Year: 1979
GLP: no data
Test substance: other TS
Remark: Ames test with and without metabolic activation with S-9 mix
prepared from liver homogenate of Aroclor 1254-pretreated
male Sprague-Dawley rats.
Test substance: caffeine; according to the authors, purity was of the finest
pure grade
06-DEC-2001 (114)
Result: negative
06-DEC-2001 (114)
Remark: Endpoints:
- Phage T5 resistance (Novick and Szilard, 1951; Kubitschek
and Bendigkeit, 1958)
- Phage resistance (Gezelius and Fries, 1952; Glass and
Novick, 1959)
- Methionine and tryptophan independence (Greer, 1958)
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (4) not assignable
06-DEC-2001 (118) (119) (120) (121) (122)
Type: other
System of testing: miscellaneous test systems
Result: negative
Remark: Syrian hamster embryo cells, hamster embryo cells and mouse
C3H2K cells were used.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (4) not assignable
secondary literature
07-DEC-2001 (128) (147) (148)
Type: other
System of testing: Photobacterium leiognathi
Metabolic activation: without
Result: positive
Result: ambiguous
Remark: The test substance was positive in the soybean (Glycine max
merrill) spot test as a short-term assay for environmental
mutagens.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (3) invalid
unsuitable test system
07-DEC-2001 (172)
Remark: The tested substance reduced the number of single and double
crossing-over recombinants in in chromosome II and affected
the gene conversion frequency at the ade7 locus.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (3) invalid
unsuitable test system
07-DEC-2001 (173)
Method: other: according to Ames, B.N. et al.: Mutat. Res. 31, 347-364
Year: 1975
GLP: no data
Test substance: other TS
Remark: After 1-4 weeks of treatment, MCTI cells only showed minimal
effects at all concentrations tested.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (3) invalid
tumor cell line, unsuitable test system
06-DEC-2001 (175)
Year: 1980
GLP: no data
Test substance: other TS
Remark: Inhibition zone was 5 and 11 mm for tester strain PolA+ and
PolA-, respectively.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (4) not assignable
secondary literature
06-DEC-2001 (180)
Remark: Binding to single strand DNA, but not to double strand DNA
was seen.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (4) not assignable
secondary literature
07-DEC-2001 (182)
Remark: Rings of trachea from 8-week old male F344 rats were
incubated for 2 hours at 37 degree Centigrade containing
10uCi/ml (methyl-3H)dTd and the test substance. No induction
of UDS was observed.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (4) not assignable
secondary literature
07-DEC-2001 (183)
Result: negative
Remark: Ames test with and without metabolic activation with S-9 mix
prepared from rats, hamsters, and mice.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (4) not assignable
06-DEC-2001 (191)
Result: negative
Type: other
System of testing: Simian Virus (SV) 40
Concentration: ca. 0.2 - 29 mg/ml (10 - 150 mM)
Metabolic activation: without
Result: positive
Method: other
Year: 1986
GLP: no data
Test substance: other TS
Result: The aim of the study was to investigate the ability of the
test substance to induce aneuploidy in mammalian oocytes.
Following superovulation, groups of 10 or 20 females mice
were given an i.p. injection of the test substance at
various times prior to metaphase I (MI). Ovulated oocytes
were collected from the oviducts and processed for
cytogenetic analysis. Statistical analysis of the
frequencies of hyperploid, MI, diploid, premature centromere
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 163
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Remark: Chinese hamster and BALB/c mouse bone marrow was scored;
positive and negative results were observed.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (4) not assignable
secondary literature
07-DEC-2001 (214)
Result: Thirty rats were fed a diet containing the test substance at
a concentration of 0.102% (ca. 46 mg/kg/d); thirty control
rats were fed unsupplemented diet. The rats were sacrificed
when moribund or after 117 weeks of feeding. Blood was
collected by heart puncture and assayed for chromosomal
aberrations (gaps, breaks, and structural chromosome
changes). No significant difference in the frequency of
chromosomal aberrations between treated and control rats was
found.
Test condition: Groups of 30 rats.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (2) valid with restrictions
acceptable, well documented publication which meets basic
scientific principles
Flag: Critical study for SIDS endpoint
11-SEP-2000 (218)
Test condition: Groups of male rats; test group: 14 animals; vehicle control
group: no data on number of animals.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (2) valid with restrictions
acceptable, well documented publication which meets basic
scientific principles
Flag: Critical study for SIDS endpoint
11-SEP-2000 (219)
Result: negative
Remark: ICR/Ha Swiss mice were applied the test substance either via
the drinking water (0.1%; ca. 200 mg/kg/d) for 8 weeks prior
to mating or as a single i.p. injection at dose levels in
the range between 168 - 240 mg/kg.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (3) invalid
significant methodicological deficiencies
07-DEC-2001 (227)
Result: The dominant lethal effect of the test substance was studied
in SPF Swiss CD-1 mice. Groups of 50 male mice were
administered the test substance (in tap water) by gavage at
doses of 0 (vehicle control) or 90 mg/kg/d daily for 5
11-SEP-2000 (228)
Result: Male C57Bl mice were administered the test substance in the
drinking water for 100 days (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3,
0.5%) of for 140 days (0.2 and 0.4%) and were then mated to
untreated C3H females for three weeks or more. According to
the authors, preliminary results showed that the test
substance induced dominant-lethal mutations as indicated by
preimplantation losses and resorptions. However, the data
were considered to be not sufficient to establish a good
dose-relationship.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (3) invalid
inconsistent results
07-DEC-2001 (229)
GLP: no
Test substance: no data
Remark: Berlin K males were fed the test substance and mated with
untreated Basc females. Sex-linked recessive lethals were
scored in the F2 generation and confirmed in the F3
generation.
Test substance: caffeine; according to the authors, purity was of the finest
pure grade
30-AUG-2000 (114)
Remark: Adult males were injected with the tests ubstance in saline
and were mated with untreated Muller-5 females. No
substance-related effect was seen.
Test substance: caffeine
25-AUG-2000 (238)
18-DEC-2000 (240)
Remark: Bone marrow micronucleus test using mice. The compounds were
given twice i.p. with an interval of 24h. No induction of
micronuclei were observed.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (2) valid with restrictions
meets generally accepted scientific standards
07-DEC-2001 (241)
Remark: CBA male mouse, rat bone marrow and peripheral blood and
Chinese hamster bone marrow was examined. Positive and
nebative results were observed.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (4) not assignable
07-DEC-2001 (242) (243)
Result: negative
Remark: Tablet method with BrdU; bone marrow cells were examined.
Results only in a graphical manner.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (3) invalid
19-DEC-2001 (252)
Result: Thirty rats were fed a diet containing the test substance at
a concentration of 0.102% (ca. 46 mg/kg/d); thirty control
rats were fed unsupplemented diet. The rats were sacrificed
when moribund or after 117 weeks of feeding. Blood was
collected by heart puncture and assayed for sister chromatid
exchanges. According to the authors, the frequency of sister
chromatid exchanges was similar in treated and control rats.
Test condition: Groups of 30 rats.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (2) valid with restrictions
acceptable publication which meets basic scientific
principles
11-SEP-2000 (218)
Result: Female larvae were eposed to the test substance (1% in the
diet) for 1 hour, returned to normal millieu and were
allowed to hatch. A significant change in the sex ratio (%
of males in the total number of flies) was observed; sex
ratio was 47.1 and 52.6% males in the dosed and untreated
control group, respectively.
Test substance: caffeine
18-MAY-2001 (229)
Method: other
GLP: no
Test substance: other TS
07-DEC-2001 (263)
5.7 Carcinogenicity
Year: 1982
GLP: no data
Test substance: other TS
mice.
The test substance did not affect estrous cycle, plasma levels
of prolactin and growth hormones, or endocrine organ weights.
According to the authors, these results suggsted that
promotion by caffeine of HAN growth was minimally mediated
by the endocrine system.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (4) not assignable
secondary literature
17-DEC-2001 (274)
Result: The rats were fed a diet containing the test substance at
concentrations of 0% (control) or 0.102%. Reduced mean
survival time was observed in treated animals.
According to IARC, the study was judged to be of limited
value due to the use of only one sex (male) and high
mortality in treated animals.
Test substance: caffeine; according to the authors, purity was 99.6-99.9%
Type: Fertility
Species: rat
Sex: male
Strain: other: Osborne-Mendel, Holtzman
Route of administration: oral feed
Exposure Period: up to 75 weeks
Frequency of treatment: continuously in the diet
Doses: ca. 60, 300 mg/kg/d (0.1, 0.5% in the diet)
Control Group: no data specified
Result: The rats were fed a diet containing the test substance at a
concentration of containing 0.5% of the test substance for
64 and 14 to 75 weeks. Testicular atrophy and
aspermatogenesis were observed in both experiments. (64
weeks: 13/13 animals had athrophy of testes and
aspermatogenesis, 14 weeks: 4/5 animals had atrophie and 3/5
oligospermatogenesis and 1/5 aspermatogenesis; 75 weeks: 8/8
had athrophy, 378 oligospermatogenesis and 5/8
aspermatogenesis)
In a third experiment caffeine were fed to Holzman rats for
19 weeks to determine whether testicular athrophy would be
induced in a second strain of rat. The effects were similar
to those in the other experiments (11/11 rats had athrophy,
1/11 oligospermatogenesis and 10/11 aspermatogenesis).
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (3) invalid
high mortality, small group size, one dose tested only
17-DEC-2001 (277)
Type: Fertility
Species: rat
Sex: male/female
Strain: Sprague-Dawley
Route of administration: gavage
Exposure Period: 23 weeks (during Task 2); for further details see
freetext
Frequency of treatment: no data
Premating Exposure Period
male: 1 week (Task 2)
female: 1 week (Task 2)
Duration of test: 36 weeks (Tasks 1, 2, 3, 4)
Doses: 12.5, 25, 50 mg/kg/d
Control Group: yes, concurrent vehicle
NOAEL Parental: < 12.5 mg/kg bw
NOAEL F1 Offspring: < 12.5 mg/kg bw
(RACB)
Year: 1996
GLP: yes
Test substance: other TS
Type: Fertility
Species: mouse
Sex: male/female
Strain: CD-1
Route of administration: drinking water
Exposure Period: 21 weeks (Task 2)
Frequency of treatment: continuously in the drinking water
Premating Exposure Period
male: 1 week
female: 1 week
Duration of test: 34 weeks (Tasks 1, 2, 4)
Doses: ca. 22, 44, 88 mg/kg/d (0.012, 0.025, 0.05% in the
drinking water)
Control Group: yes, concurrent no treatment
NOAEL Parental: 22 mg/kg bw
NOAEL F1 Offspring: 22 mg/kg bw
NOAEL F2 Offspring: 88 mg/kg bw
Year: 1985
GLP: no data
Test substance: other TS
Type: Fertility
Species: mouse
Sex: male/female
Strain: CD-1
Route of administration: drinking water
Exposure Period: 21 weeks (Task 2)
Frequency of treatment: continuously in the drinking water
Premating Exposure Period
male: 1 week
female: 1 week
Type: Fertility
Species: hen
Sex: male
Strain: no data
Route of administration: oral feed
Exposure Period: no data
Frequency of treatment: continuously in the diet
Doses: ca. 100 mg/kg (0.1% in the diet)
Control Group: no data specified
Remark: Females received the dose levels seven days before mating
and through to 20 days of lactation; F1 offspring received
the same treatment, mature F1 offspring were mated with
untreated animals
Result: Females received the test substance starting seven days
before mating and through to 20 days of lactation. F1
offspring were treated in the same manner. Mature F1
offspring were mated with untreated animals.
Pregnancy rate and reproduction were unaffected in F0
females and F1 males. Among F1 females, the pregnancy rate
was unaffected but a decrease in the number of corpora
lutea, implants and fetuses was observed in the high dose
group. F2 fetuses of these high dose females were small and
edematous.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (4) not assignable
abstract
18-DEC-2001 (287)
Remark: Number of females were mated are 60 (for control and lowest
dose and 30 for mid and high dose group
Result: The rats were administered the test substance at
concentrations of 0, 0.018, 0.036, and 0.07% (0, 180, 360,
and 700 ppm) and were sacrificed at gestation day (gd) 20,
postnatal day (pnd) 0, or pnd 6.
Maternal toxicity consisted of reduced drinking water and
food consumption at 700 ppm (all groups) and retarded body
weight gain at and above 360 ppm for rats sacrified on gd 20
and at 700 ppm for rats killed at pnd 0 and 6.
Results for animals killed on gd 20:
decreased number of viable fetuses, increased incidence of
sternebral variations and specific other skeletal variations
(mainly as signs of delayed ossification) at and above 360
ppm.
Results for animals killed on pnd 0:
no reproductive effects; at 700 ppm affected sternebral
development and increased other skeletal variations as well
as single cases of reduced ossification at 360 ppm and
above.
Results for animals killed on pnd 6:
no reproductive effects; at 700 ppm transient impaired
weight gain in neonates and reduced sternebral ossification.
General assessment:
Reversibility of most of the skeletal effects was shown
Test substance: caffeine, USP standard, purity 98.7%
Reliability: (2) valid with restrictions
13-AUG-2002 (291)
Method: other
Year: 1978
GLP: no data
Test substance: other TS
Method: other
Year: 1981
GLP: no data
Test substance: other TS
Result: The rats were administered the test substance at dose levels
of 10 or 100 mg/kg/d, either as single bolus or as four
divided doses given at 3 hour intervals throughout the day.
Controls were given distilled water at the same time.
Maternal body weight and food and water consumption were
reduced in the two groups receiving a total dose of 100
mg/kg/d and given 2.5 mg/kg four times daily. Dose-related
decreases in fetal weight, placental weight and crown-rump
length and related retardation of skeletal ossification were
observed. Major fetal abnormities, mainly ectrodactyly were
only seen in the group given 100 mg/kg in a single daily
dose.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (2) valid with restrictions
well documented
18-DEC-2001 (303)
Result: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of the
test substance on postnatal neurobehavioral development.
Groups of 14-15 pregnant Sprague-Dawley (Charles River CD
Remark: The lowest observed effect level for teratogenicity was 130
mg/kg. Teratogenic effects were only observed at dose levels
that were maternally toxic and fetotoxic. According to the
authors, administration of the test substance via diet
produced no teratogenic effects.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (4) not assignable
abstract
18-DEC-2001 (305)
Result: The aim of the study was to determine the influence of the
test substance on the early differentiation of fetal rat
ovaries and testes. Treatments were begun at day 1 of
gestation and were continued until sacrifice on day 13, 14,
15, 16, or, for the ovaries only, day 20 of gestation.
In the male fetuses, the test substance significantly
inhibited differentiation of the interstitial tissue and
Leydig cells; the number of Leydig cells exhibiting
3-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity was decreased
and thus testosterone biosynthesis in the fetal testes was
reduced (days 15 and 16). The test substance had also an
effect on the early morphogenic organisation of the
The test substance did not affect the rate of early mitotic
proliferation of germ cells, nor later in development, the
numbers of cells entering meiosis.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (3) invalid
unsuitable test system
18-DEC-2001 (306)
size and litter weight of live pups, and number of live and
dead pups on days 1 and 5 post partum. No substance-related
effects were observed. According to the authors, based on
the results of this study, the test substance was predicted
to have no fetotoxic or teratogenic effects.
Test substance: caffeine
Result: The aim of the study was to determine the effect of acute
maternal toxicity on fetal development. The dams were
administered a slightly to moderately toxic dose of the test
substance in distilled water on day 8 of gestation and were
sacrificed on day 18 for evaluation of developmental
toxicity. No difference between treated and control group
was seen concerning embryonic resorption, growth, skeletal
development, or terata. Supernumerary ribs was the only
observed fetal effect with a linear inverse relationship
between maternal body weight gain during gestation.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (4) not assignable
screening
18-DEC-2001 (313)
Remark: NOEL for maternal toxicity can not be given since data were
insufficient reported; study does not meet current standard
Result: About 30% of the high dose females died. Dyspnoea and
convulsions were observed at 200 and 250 mg/kg. Increased
resorptions were recorded for the high dose group. Fetal
body weight was decreased in both dose groups. Malformations
occurred dose-dependently in all fetuses, these included
cleft palate, digital defects and macrognathia; subcutaneous
hematomas were also observed.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (4) not assignable
documentation insufficient for assessment
18-DEC-2001 (315)
Result: The malformation of the joints and bones induced by the test
substance was studied in two groups of TO mice. One group
was administered the test substance on days 10 to 14 of
gestation; fetuses were collected on day 18 of gestation.
The second group was prepared as a control. A modest
increase in resorption, and significant reduction of both
body weight and length of the fetuses was noted. Limb
malformations were found in 40%. Alizarin and Alcain blue
revealed reduction in endochondral ossification, especially
in small bones. Histologically, the large joints (knee and
hip joint) were not affected while small joints showed some
defects (absence of the joint cavity). Absence of the
forearm and/or the hand was seen in some fetuses. These
anomalies were common in th 11th day of gestation group.
According to the authors, these results suggested that a
high dose of the test substance retarded the skeletal growth
and inhibited the differentiation of some of the small
joints.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (4) not assignable
abstract
18-DEC-2001 (317)
embryonic development
- untreated controls (males and females)
In parent animals, the test substance increased death rate
and percentage of abortion and decreased maternal body
weight gain and uterine weight. Lethargy and a decrease in
mating rate was noted for treated females. In treated males,
increased activity and normal mating rate was noted. Marked
histopathological alterations of ovaries and testes was
observed.
In the treated groups, the incidence of resorptions (early
fetal death) and stillbirth (late fetal death) was
increased. Retarded ossification and shortness of some bones
was observed. Skull, sternum, girdles and limbs were the
main bones affected.
Test substance: caffeine
Reliability: (3) invalid
unsuitable test system
18-DEC-2001 (323) (324)
13-FEB-2001 (337)
13-FEB-2001 (342)
14-FEB-2001 (359)
14-MAR-2001 (381)
Remark: In this cohort study, 16,911 men who had completed a mailed
dietary questionnaire were followed for 11.5 years with 721
deaths reported from ischemic heart disease (IHD). Although
no association was found between coffee consumption and
mortality from IHD, a negative association between coffee
consumption and mortality from diseases other than IHD was
found. This negative association, found exclusively in the
first four years of follow-up, was observed in deaths from
digestive diseases, other than malignancies, and paralysis
agitans. The negative association appeared to reflect a
reduction in coffee consumption.
toxic effects (CHD)
14-MAR-2001 (382)
Remark: The association between coffee intake and blood lipids and
blood pressure was studied in 14,168 men and 14,859 women.
Serum cholesterol increased linearly with increasing coffee
consumption (8% for men and 10% for women). Triglycerides
showed a negative association with coffee consumption.
Drinking 1 cup of coffee or more, a significantly negative
association between both systolic and diastolic blood
pressure and number of cups was found.
toxic effects (RR)
14-MAR-2001 (391)
13-MAR-2001 (396)
14-MAR-2001 (397)
immediate effects.
27-FEB-2001 (400)
01-MAR-2001 (422)
Remark: Bone density of both hips and the total body was measured
in 138 healthy postmenopausal women aged 55-70 to examine
effect of caffeine intake and bone loss. The habitual
dietary caffeine intake of this cohort of 138
postmenopausal women ranged from 0-1400 mg/d and was not
associated with total body or hip bone density
measurements.
toxic effects (calcium)
01-MAR-2001 (423)
role.
toxic effects (tolerance and withdrawl, review)
01-MAR-2001 (437)
the coffee and tea consumption patterns of the case and the
controls.
toxic effects (benign breast disease)
15-FEB-2001 (442)
Remark: mutagenicity
The effect of methylxanthines on chromosomes of human
lymphocyte in culture was investigated. Caffeine and the
dimethylxanthines cause breakage at 750 g/ml. No
chromosome damage was exhibited by monomethylxanthines.
01-MAR-2001 (449)
damaging effect.
mutagenicity
14-MAR-2001 (450)
Remark: 101 women with brest cancer were were examined to determine
whether caffeine or coffee intake influence cell
differentiation (well and moderate versus poor) in tumors.
Women with moderately to well-differentiated tumors had
higher caffeine or coffee intake than women with poorly
differentiated tumors.
carcinogenicity (breast)
29-MAR-2001 (459) (460)
Remark: A case-control study in 331 women with fetal loss and 993
controls with normal pregnancy was done to determine the
influence of caffeine intake before and during pregnancy
and the risk of fetal loss. The adjusted ORs for fetal loss
associated with caffeine intake before pregnancy were 1.29
(95% CI 0.85-1.95) for 48 to 162 mg; 1.37 (95% CI
0.92-2.04) for 163 to 321 mg; and 1.85 (95% CI 1.18-2.89)
for more than 321 mg. The respective adjusted ORs for
caffeine intake during pregnancy were 1.5 (95% CI 0.82-
1.63), 1.95 (95 % CI 1.29-2.93), and 2.62 (95% CI 1.38-
5.01). OR increased by a factor of 1.22 (1.10 to 1.34) for
each 100 mg of caffeine ingested daily during pregnancy.
The results of this study are discussed controversely by
other authors.
reproductive toxicity (fetal loss, abortion)
05-MAR-2001 (518) (519) (520) (521)
294 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
16-MAR-2001 (535)
28-MAR-2001 (552)
Type: Behaviour
30-JAN-2002 (558)
22-AUG-2000 (559)
31-AUG-2000 (560)
24-AUG-2000 (561)
304 UNEP PUBLICATIONS
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
31-AUG-2000 (562)
31-AUG-2000 (563)
31-AUG-2000 (564)
31-AUG-2000 (565)
31-AUG-2000 (566)
Remark: Male rats were given 1, 2.5, 10 and 25 mg/kg of the test
substance i.v. and the kinetics found were compared with
liver perfusion patterns. For doses less than 10 mg/kg or
mg/l, caffeine blood or perfusate concentrations/time
profiles followed first order kinetics and the elimination
rate constant (average 0.013/min) and half-life (55 min)
were similar for in vivo and ex vivo conditions. After doses
of 10 and 25 mg/kg or mg/l, kinetics were nonlinear. The
area under the blood or medium con centration-time curve
increased; however, this increase was not dose-related.
Test substance: caffeine
31-AUG-2000 (567)
21-AUG-2000 (572)
Type: Cytotoxicity
22-AUG-2000 (573)
Type: Cytotoxicity
31-AUG-2000 (574)
Type: Cytotoxicity
22-AUG-2000 (575)
Type: Cytotoxicity
31-AUG-2000 (576)
Type: Distribution
31-AUG-2000 (577)
Type: Excretion
Remark: After i.v. injection of 200 ug (10 uCi) to female pigs, about
68% and 17% of the radioactivity was excreted in the urine
and the feces, respectively. Total excretion was ca. 85%.
Topical application of 200 ug (10 uCi) resulted in a total
excretion (urine and feces) of 11.8% (urinary excretion:
8.5%)
30-JAN-2002 (578)
UNEP PUBLICATIONS 309
OECD SIDS CAFFEINE
5. TOXICITY DATE: 04-MAR-2003
SUBSTANCE ID: 58-08-2
Type: Immunotoxicity
22-AUG-2000 (579)
Type: Immunotoxicity
22-AUG-2000 (580)
Type: Metabolism
30-JAN-2002 (581)
Type: Toxicokinetics
31-AUG-2000 (582)
Type: other
Type: other
Remark: The aim of the study was to investigate the lasting effects
of early exposure to the test substance. Pregnant rats were
fed the test substance (20 mg/kg/d) starting on day 9 of
gestation until day 93 post partum (weaning of the pups: day
22 post partum). Thereafter the dams received caffeine-free
diet and were sacrificed at day 388. In the offspring,
lasting effects on the behavior (increased locomotive
activity) and biochemically altered brain regions were
noted.
Test substance: caffeine
31-AUG-2000 (586)
Type: other
22-AUG-2000 (587)
31-AUG-2000 (588)
24-AUG-2000 (589)
31-AUG-2000 (590)
31-AUG-2000 (591)
31-AUG-2000 (72)
21-AUG-2000 (592)
31-AUG-2000 (593)
21-AUG-2000 (594)
31-AUG-2000 (595)
22-AUG-2000 (596)
31-AUG-2000 (597)
22-AUG-2000 (598)
31-AUG-2000 (599)
31-AUG-2000 (600)
31-AUG-2000 (601)
31-AUG-2000 (602)
21-AUG-2000 (117) (608) (609) (610) (195) (611) (612) (613) (614) (615)
22-AUG-2000 (616) (72) (617) (618) (619) (620) (584) (621) (622)
31-AUG-2000 (627)
24-AUG-2000 (628)
31-AUG-2000 (629)
Remark: Forelimb buds of day 14 rat fetuses were cut into pieces and
transplanted subcutaneously into athymic (nude) mice. On the
7th, 9th, and 11th day after grafting, the nude mice were
treated orally with the test substance at doses of 200, 400,
and 800 mg/kg. On the 20th day, the grafted tissue was
examined macroscopically and histologically. The
differentiation of the graft was significantly inhibited at
all dose levels.
Test substance: caffeine
31-AUG-2000 (630)
31-AUG-2000 (631)
24-AUG-2000 (632)
31-AUG-2000 (633)
31-AUG-2000 (634)
23-AUG-2000 (635)
31-AUG-2000 (640)
23-AUG-2000 (641)
Remark: The test substance gave positive results in the hydra assay
(in vitro developmental toxicity prescreen).
Test substance: caffeine
Remark: The vaccina virus test was used as a model system for
teratology testing. Strain western reserve was grown in
primate cell cultures (vehicle: medium). According to the
author, this assay was determined to be 92% sensitive,
specific and accurate in predicting rodent teratology. The
RD50 was the dose which inhibited or stimulated virus growth
by 50%. Positive results were obtained for the test
substance. RD50 was 200 ug/ml.
Test substance: caffeine
24-AUG-2000 (644)
Remark: Cultured fetal palates prepared from gestation day 12.5 ICR
mice were incubated with the test substance at
concentrations of 0.5, 1, and 2 mM (ca. 97, 194, 388 ug/ml)
for 72 hours (vehicle: ethanol). The stage of palatal fusion
was evaluated by microscopy. No substance-related effect was
seen at the low and mid concentration. At 2 mM, palatal
development was inhibited.
Test substance: caffeine
31-AUG-2000 (645)
31-AUG-2000 (646)
31-AUG-2000 (647)
31-AUG-2000 (648)
31-AUG-2000 (649)
24-AUG-2000 (650)
31-AUG-2000 (651)
31-AUG-2000 (652)
24-AUG-2000 (653)
31-AUG-2000 (654)
31-AUG-2000 (655)
7.1 Function
7.4 User
7.5 Resistance
Ext. Medium: water, dry extinguishing media, carbon dioxide (CO2), foam
Add. Information: Dispose of fire debris and contaminated extinguishing water in
accordance with local regulations.
Products arising: unknown
Remark: Immediately rinse mouth and then drink plenty of water, summon
physician.
Flag: non confidential, Critical study for SIDS endpoint
17-JAN-2003 (2)
Remark: keep patient calm, remove to fresh air, summon medical help
Flag: non confidential, Critical study for SIDS endpoint
17-JAN-2003 (2)
(2) BASF AG, Safety data sheet CAFFEINE ANHYDROUS FINE POWDER
1A001BG2, 25.10.2001
(6) BASF AG, Safety data sheet Coffein Anh. Gr. Plv. 1A001BK1,
07.06.2001
(13) Budavari, S. (ed.), The Merck Index, 11th ed. Rahway, Merck
& Co. 248 (1989)
(44) DeYoung, D.J. et al.: Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 56, 143-150,
(1996)
(61) Scott, C.C. and Chen, K.K.: J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 82,
87-97 (1944);
cited in: Schlede, E. et al.: Arch. Toxicol. 66, 455-470
(1992)
(78) Poe, C.F. and Johnson, C.C.: Acta Pharmac. Toxicol. 9 (3),
267-274 (1953);
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 25995
(79) RTECS, update 9301 (through July 1993): Chem. Pharm. Bull.
22, 1459 (1974)
(83) RTECS, update 9301 (through July 1993): Toxicol. Lett. 29,
25 (1985)
(84) RTECS, update 9301 (through July 1993): Kiso To Rinsho 13,
791 (1979)
(88) Dubick, M.A. and Majumdar, A.P.N.: Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol.
Med. 191 (2), 153-158 (1989);
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 13843
(97) Ingram, A.J. and Grosso, P.: J. Appl. Toxicol. 5(2), 53-60
(1985);
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 2452
(102) Sacks, L.E. and Mihara, K.: Mutat. Res. 117, 55-65 (1983)
(104) DeMarco, A. and Cozzi, R.: Mutat. Res. 69, 55-69 (1980)
(105) DeMarco, A. and Polani, S.: Mutat. Res. 84, 91-99 (1981)
(109) Heddle, J.A. and Bruce W.R. in: Hiatt, H.H. et al. (eds.):
Origins of Human Cancer, CSH Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
(1977); pp. 1549-1557
(112) Furth, E.E. and Thilly, W.G.: J. Food Saf. 1, 222 -237
(1978);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(113) McCann, J. et al.: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 5135-5139
(1975);
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 4023
(116) Clarke, C.H. and Wade, M.J.: Mutat. Res. 28, 123-125
(1975);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(118) Gezelius, K. and Fries, N.: Hereditas 38, 112 -114 (1952);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(119) Glass, E.A. and Novick, A.: J. Bacteriol. 77, 10-16 (1959);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(122) Novick, A. and Szilard L.: Cold Spring Habor Symp. Quant.
Biol. 16, 337 -343 (1951);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(124) Voogd, C.E. and van der Vet, P.: Experientia 25, 85-86
(1969);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(128) Casto, B.C. et al.: Chem. Biol. Interact. 13, 105 -125
(1976);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(129) Amacher, D.E. and Zelljadt, I.: Mutat. Res. 136, 137-145
(1984);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Ccarcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(130) Arlett, C.F. and Harcourt, S.A.: Mutat. Res. 14, 431-437
(1972);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291 -390
(132) Kao, F.T. and Puck, T.T.: J. Cell Physiol. 74, 245-258
(1969);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(133) Trosko, J.E. and Chu, E.H.Y.: Mutat. Res. 12, 337-340
(1971);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(145) Sasaki, M.S. and Tonomura, A.: Cancer Res. 33, 1829-1836
(1973);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Ccarcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(148) Ledinko, N. and Evans, M.: Cancer Res. 33, 2936-2938 (1973);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(150) Faed, M.J.W. and Mourelatos, D.: Mutat. Res. 49, 437-440
(1978);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(152) Ishii, Y. and Bender, M.A.: Mutat. Res. 51, 419 -425 (1978);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
(153) Pant, G.S. et al.: Hiroshima J. Med. Sci. 25, 99-105 (1976);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(155) Tohida, H. and Oikawa, A.: Mutat. Res. 201, 1-8 (1988);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(167) Kaul, B.D. and Zutshi, U.: Cytol. Bot. 7, 261-264 (1973);
cited in: Ma, T.-H.: Mutat. Res. 99, 257-271 (1982)
(171) Van't Hof, J. and Schairer, L.A.: Mutat. Res. 99, 303 -315
(1982)
(183) Ide, F. et al.: J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 102 (2), 115-126
(1981);
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 12008
(187) Kato, H.: Expl. Cell Res. 88 (2), 239 -247 (1974);
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 7198
(191) McGregor, D.B. et al.: presented at the the 7th Int. Symp.
Chem. Toxicol. Aspects Environ. Quality 7-10 Sept (1981);
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 10666
(203) Tohda, H. and Oikawa, A.: Mutat. Res. 201, 1-8 (1988);
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 9136
(214) Roehrborn, G. and Buckel, U.: Hum. Genet. 33, 113 -119
(1976);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(221) Frei, J.V. and Venitt, S.: Mutat. Res. 29, 89-96 (1975)
(222) Murota, T. and Murakami, A.: Mutat. Res. 38, 343-344 (1976);
abstract no. 14
(231) Clark, A.M. and Clark, E.G.: Mutat. Res. 6, 227-234 (1968)
(235) Reguly, M.L. and Marques, E.K.: Rev. Brasil. Genet. 11, 1-11
(1988);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(236) Abraham, S.K. and Kesavan, P.C.: Mutat. Res. 53, 142 (1978);
abstract no. 2
(241) Matter, B.E. and Grauwiler, J.: Mutat. Res. 23, 239-249
(1974); and
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(243) Jenssen, D. and Ramel, C.: Mutat. Res. 58, 51-65 (1978);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(247) MacGregor, J.T. et al.: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87,
9962-9965 (1990);
cited in: Anon.: Nutr. Rev. 49 (5), 285-287 (1991)
(249) Panigrahi, G.B. and Rao, A.R.: Mutat. Res. 122, 347-353
(1983)
(261) Gabridge, M.G. and Legator, M.S.: Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
130, 831-834 (1969)
(267) Mohr, U. et al.: Fd. Chem. Toxic. 22, 377-382 (1982); and
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(290) Dunlop, M. and Court, J.M.: Biol. Neonat. 39, 178 -184
(1981);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(291) Collins, T.F.X. et al.: Fd. Chem. Toxic. 25, 647-662 (1987)
(293) Palm P.E. et al.: Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 44, 1-16, (1978)
(294) Gilbert, S.G. and Rice, D.C.: Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 16,
299-308 (1991)
(295) Gilbert, S.G. and Rice, D.C.: Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 17,
454-465 (1991)
(296) Gilbert, S.G. and Rice, D.C.: Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 22, 41-50
(1994)
(297) Gilbert, S.G. and Rice, D.C.: The Toxicologist, 8 (1), 239
(1988); abstract no. 952;
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 6082
(298) Gilbert, S.G. and Rice, D.C.: The Toxicologist, 9 (1), 103
(1989); abstract no. 411;
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 9635
(303) Smith, S.E. et al.: Fd. Chem. Toxic. 25 (2), 125-133 (1987);
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 5043
(315) Fujii, T. and Nishimura, H.: Okajimas Folia Anat. Jpn. 46,
167-175 (1969)
(316) Nishimura, H. and Nakai, K.: Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 104,
140-142 (1960);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(326) Barone J.J., Grice, H.C., Fd. Chem. Toxic., 32 (1), 65-77,
(1994)
(332) Sawynok, J., Yaksh, T.L., Pharmacol. Rev. 45, 43-85, (1993)
(338) Bonati M., Garattini S., in: Des P.B., (ed.), Caffeine,
Springer, Berlin, 48-56, (1984)
(339) Arnaud M.J., Welsch C., in: Rietbrock N., et al., (eds.),
Methods in Clinical Pharmacology, No. 3, Vieweg,
Braunschweig, 135-148, (1982)
(347) Parsons W.D., Neims A.H., Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 24, 40-45,
(1978)
(353) Statland B.E., et al., New Engl. J. Med., 295 (2), 110-111,
(1976)
(354) van der Merwe P.J., et al., SAMJ, 74, 163-164, (1988)
(357) Rodopoulos N., Norman A., Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest., 56,
259-268, (1996)
(358) Stavric B., Fd. Chem. Toxic., 26 (7), 645 -662, (1988)
(363) Ashton C.H., Br. Med. J., 295 (6609), 1293-1294, (1987)
(368) Leson C.L., et al., Clin. Toxicol., 26, 407 -415, (1988)
(369) Mrvos R.M., et al., Vet. Hum. Toxicol., 31, 571 -572, (1989)
(370) Ray Price K., Fligner D.J., Ann. Emerg. Med., 19, 44-46,
(1990)
(376) Jick H., et al., New Engl. J. Med., 289, 63-67, (1973)
(379) Willett W.C., et al., J. Am. Med. Assoc., 275 (6), 458-462,
(1996)
(380) Yano K., et al., New Engl. J. Med., 297, 405-409, (1977)
(383) Welin L., et al., in: MacMahon B., Sugimura T., (eds.)
Banbury Report 17, Cold Spring Harbor Lab., 219-229, (1984)
(387) Kawachi I., et al., Br. Heart J., 72, 269 -275, (1994)
(389) Robertson D., et al., New Engl. J. Med., 298 (4), 181-186,
(1978)
(396) Dawber T.R., et al., New Engl. J. Med., 291, 871-874, (1974)
(397) Bertrand C.A., New Engl. J. Med., 299 (6), 315-316, (1978)
(398) Lane, J.D., et al., Psychosomatic Med., 60, 327 -330, (1998)
(399) Green P.J., et al., Ann. Behav. Med., 18 (3), 201 -206,
(1996)
(408) Curatolo P.W., Robertson D., Ann. Int. Med., 98, 641-653,
(1983)
(411) Superko H.R., et al., Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 54, 599 -605,
(1991)
(416) Massey L.K., Opryszek A.A., Nutrition Res., 10, 741 -747,
(1990)
(419) Lloyd T., et al., Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 54, 1005-1010, (1991)
573-578, (1994)
(422) Kreiger N., et al., Int. J. Epidemiol., 21, 953 -958, (1992)
(423) Lloyd T., et al., Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 65, 1 -5, (1997)
(427) Lloyd T., et al., J. Am. Coll. Nutr., 17, 454-457, (1998)
(428) Ferrini R.L., Barrett -Connor E., Am. J. Epidemiol., 144 (7),
642- 644, (1996)
(439) Levinson W., Dunn P.M., Arch. Intern. Med. 146, 1773-1775,
(1986)
(1982)
(444) Lubin F., et al., J. Am. Med. Assoc., 253 (16), 2388-2392,
(1985)
(448) Nehlig, A. and Debry, G.: Mutat. Res. 317, 145-162 (1994)
(452) Nehlig, A. and Debry, G.: World Rev. Nutr. Diet. 79, 185-221
(1996)
(454) Lubin F., et al., J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 74, 569-573 (1985)
(458) Lubin F., Ron E., Cancer Letters, 53, 81-90, (1990)
(460) Pozner J., Papatestas A.E., J. Am. Med. Assoc., 255, 748,
(1986)
(468) Cipriani, F. and Geddes, M.: Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita 32 (4),
573-593 (1996)
(477) Nishi M., et al., Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., 26, 42-48, (1996)
(479) Dlugosz L., Bracken M.B., Epidemiol. Rev. 14, 83-100, (1992)
(480) Nehlig, A. and Debry, G.: J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 13 (1), 6-21
(1994)
(498) Brooke O.G., et al., Br. Med. J., 298, 795-801, (1989)
(507) Cook, D.G., et al., Br. Med. J., 313, 1358-1362, (1996)
(517) van der Berg B.J., in: Reed D.M., Stanley F.J., (eds.), The
epidemiology of prematurity, Urban & Schwarzenberg,
Baltimore, 157-176, (1977)
(519) Kline J., et al., J. Am. Med. Assoc., 272 (1), 27-28, (1994)
(520) Parazzini F., et al., J. Am. Med. Assoc., 272 (1), 28,
(1994)
(521) Wei M., J. Am. Med. Assoc., 272 (1), 27, (1994)
(525) Wisborg K., et al., Br. J. Obst. Gyn., 103, 800-805, (1996)
(531) Mills J.L., et al., J. Am. Med. Assoc., 269, 593-597, (1993)
(535) Srisuphan W., Bracken M.B., Am. J. Obstet. Gyne col., 154,
14-20, (1986)
(541) Nelson M., Forfar J.O., Br. J. Med. J., 1, 523-527, (1971)
(544) Tanaka H., Arima M., Senten. Ijo., 30, 246, (1990)
(545) Linn S., et al., New Eng. J. Med., 306, 141-145, (1982)
(550) Hadeed A., Siegel S., Ped. Res., 27, 244A (1990)
(551) Hadeed A., Siegel, S., Clin. Ped., 32 (1), 45-47, (1993)
(553) Ford R.P.K., et al., Arch. Dis. Child, 78, 9-13, (1998)
(559) Gandhi, R.K. and Khanduja, K.L.: J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 12,
19-26 (1992)
(568) Arnaud, M.J. et al. in: Baille, T.A. and Jones, J.R. (eds.):
Proc. Third Int. Symp., Innsbruck, Austria, 17-21 July 1988;
pp. 645-648
(578) Carver, M.P. and Riviere, J.E.: Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 13,
714-722 (1989)
(584) Rosenkranz, H.S. and Ennever, F.K.: Fd. Chem. Toxic. 25,
247-251 (1987)
(585) Rosenkranz, H.S. and Ennever, F.K.: Fd. Chem. Toxic. 25,
795-796 (1987)
(588) Bebb, D.G. et al.: Mutat. Res. 401 (1-2), 27-32 (1998);
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 33729
(593) Rees, J.M. et al.: J. Reprod. Fertil. 90, 147 -156 (1990)
(595) Strom, J.G. and Jun, H.W.: J. Pharm. Sci. 63 (11), 1812-1813
(1974);
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 16285
(596) Lehmann, A.R. and Kirk-Bell, S.: Mutat. Res. 26, 73-82
(1974)
(597) Painter, R.B. and Howard, R.: Mutat. Res. 92 (1-2), 427-437
(1982);
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 32271
(607) Windholz, M. (ed.): The Merck Index, 9th ed., Merck & Co.
Inc., Rathway, New Jersey (1976); p. 1625
(625) Welsch, C.W. and Vander-Ploeg, L.C. in: Watson, R.R. and
Mufti, S.I. (eds.): Nutrition and Cancer Prevention, CRC
Press, Boca Raton (1996); pp. 339 -352
(627) Theiss, J.C. and Shimkin, M.B.: Cancer Res. 38, 1757-1761
(1978);
cited in: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Ccarcinogenic
Risk to Humans, Vol. 51, Lyon, France (1991); pp. 291-390
(633) Fadel, R.A.R. and Persaud, T.V.N.: Acta Anat. 144, 114-119
(1992)
(1988);
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 7881
(640) Fort, D.J. et al.: Fd. Chem. Toxic. 36 (7), 591-600 (1998);
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 33236
(652) Pratt, R.M. and Willis, W.D.: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82
(17), 5791-5794 (1985);
cited in: RIFM database, location no. 22111