Is 16108 2012
Is 16108 2012
Is 16108 2012
Whereas the Parliament of India has set out to provide a practical regime of right to
information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities,
in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority,
and whereas the attached publication of the Bureau of Indian Standards is of particular interest
to the public, particularly disadvantaged communities and those engaged in the pursuit of
education and knowledge, the attached public safety standard is made available to promote the
timely dissemination of this information in an accurate manner to the public.
1 +, 1 + 01 ' 5
Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan Jawaharlal Nehru
The Right to Information, The Right to Live Step Out From the Old to the New
! $ ' +-
Satyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda
Invent a New India Using Knowledge
! > 0 B
BharthariNtiatakam
Knowledge is such a treasure which cannot be stolen
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
Hkkjrh; ekud
ySEiksa vkSj ySEi .kkfy;ksa dh
iQksVksckW;ksyksftdy lqj{kk
Indian Standard
PHOTOBIOLOGICAL SAFETY OF LAMPS
AND LAMP SYSTEMS
ICS 29.140.40
BIS 2012
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG
NEW DELHI 110002
NATIONAL FOREWORD
This Indian Standard which is identical with IEC 62471 : 2006 Photobiological safety of lamps and
lamp systems issued by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) was adopted by the
Bureau of Indian Standards on the recommendation of the Electric Lamps and Their Auxiliaries Sectional
Committee and approval of the Electrotechnical Division Council.
The text of IEC Standard has been approved as suitable for publication as an Indian Standard without
deviations. Certain conventions are, however, not identical to those used in Indian Standards. Attention
is particularly drawn to the following:
a) Wherever the words International Standard appear referring to this standard, they should
be read as Indian Standard.
b) Comma (,) has been used as a decimal marker while in Indian Standards, the current
practice is to use a point (.) as the decimal marker.
The technical committee has reviewed the provisions of the following International Standards referred
in this adopted standard and has decided that they are acceptable for use in conjunction with this
standard:
Only the English language text of the International Standard has been retained while adopting it
in this Indian Standard, and as such the page numbers given here are not the same as in the
IEC Standard.
For the purpose of deciding whether a particular requirement of this standard is complied with, the
final value, observed or calculated expressing the result of a test, shall be rounded off in accordance
with IS 2 : 1960 Rules for rounding off numerical values (revised). The number of significant places
retained in the rounded off value should be the same as that of the specified value in this standard.
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
Indian Standard
PHOTOBIOLOGICAL SAFETY OF LAMPS
AND LAMP SYSTEMS
1. SCOPE
This International Standard gives guidance for evaluating the photobiological safety of lamps and lamp
systems including luminaires. Specifically it specifies the exposure limits, reference measurement
technique and classification scheme for the evaluation and control of photobiological hazards from all
electrically powered incoherent broadband sources of optical radiation, including LEDs but excluding
lasers, in the wavelength range from 200 nm through 3000 nm.
2. NORMATIVE REFERENCES
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated
references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced
document (including any amendments) applies.
CIE 17.4-1987 International lighting vocabulary (ILV) Joint publication IEC/CIE
CIE 53-1982 Methods of characterizing the performance of radiometers and photometers
CIE 63-1984 The spectroradiometric measurement of light sources
CIE 105-1993 Spectroradiometry of pulsed optical radiation sources
ISO Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, ISO, Geneva, 1995.
1
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
2
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
3
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
3.20 laser
Source emitting coherent optical radiation produced by stimulated emission.
3.21 light
See visible radiation.
3.25 luminance (in a given direction, at a given point of a real or imaginary surface) (Lv) (see ILV 845-
01-35)
Quantity defined by the formula
d v
Lv = (3.3)
dA cos d
where dv is the luminous flux transmitted by an elementary beam passing through the given point and
propagating in the solid angle d containing the given direction; dA is the area of a section of that
beam containing the given point; is the angle between the normal to that section and the direction of
the beam.
-2
Unit: cdm
4
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
3.29 photokeratoconjunctivitis
Inflammatory response of the cornea and conjunctiva following exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation.
Wavelengths shorter than 320 nm are most effective in causing this condition. The peak of the action
spectrum is approximately at 270 nm.
Note: Different action spectra have been published for photokeratitis and photoconjuctivitis (CIE
106/2 and CIE 106/31993); however, the latest studies support the use of a single action
spectrum for both ocular effects (CIE 106/11993).
3.31 radiance (in a given direction at a given point of a real or imaginary surface) (L) (see ILV 845-01-
34)
Quantity defined by the formula,
d
L= (3.4)
dA cos d
where d is the radiant power (flux) transmitted by an elementary beam passing through the given
point and propagating in the solid angle d containing the given direction; dA is the area of a section of
that beam containing the given point; is the angle between the normal to that section and the
direction of the beam.
-2 -1
Unit: Wm sr
The same definition holds for the time-integrated radiance Li if, in the equation for L, the radiant power d is replaced by the
radiant energy dQ.
Q = dt
0
(3.5)
Unit: J
3.33 radiant exposure (at a point of a surface, for a given duration) (see ILV 845-01-42)
Quotient of the radiant energy, dQ, incident on an element of the surface containing the point over the
given duration, by the area dA of that element.
dQ
H= (3.6a)
dA
-2
Unit: Jm
Equivalently the radiant exposure is defined as the integral of the irradiance, E, at a given point over a
given duration, t.
H= E dt
t
(3.6b)
5
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
3.41 spectral radiance (for a wavelength interval d, in a given direction at a given point) (L)
Ratio of the radiant power d() passing through that point and propagating within the solid angle d
in the given direction, to the product of the wavelength interval d and the area of a section of that
beam on a plane perpendicular to this direction (cos dA) containing the given point and to the solid
angle d.
d ( )
L = (3.9)
dA cos d d
-2 -1 -1
Unit: Wm nm sr
6
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
4.1 General
Individuals in the vicinity of lamps and lamp systems shall not be exposed to levels exceeding the limits
developed in the following sections. The exposure limit (EL) values are taken from various ICNIRP
guidelines which, in turn, are based on the best available information from experimental studies (see
Annex A for summary of publications).
The exposure limits represent conditions under which it is believed that nearly all individuals in the
general population may be repeatedly exposed without adverse health effects. However, they do not
apply to abnormally photosensitive individuals or to individuals concomitantly exposed to
photosensitizing agents, which makes individuals much more susceptible to adverse health effects
from optical radiation. Such individuals, in general, are more susceptible to adverse health effects from
optical radiation than individuals who are not abnormally photosensitive or concomitantly exposed to
photosensitizing agents. The susceptibility of photosensitive individuals varies greatly, and it is not
possible to set exposure limits for this portion of the population.
The exposure limits in this standard apply to continuous sources where the exposure duration is not
less than 0,01 ms and not more than any 8-hour period, and should be used as guides in the control of
exposure. The values should not be regarded as precisely defined lines between safe and unsafe
levels.
The limits for exposure to broad-band visible and lR-A radiation for the eye require knowledge of the
spectral radiance of the source, L, and total irradiance, E, as measured at the position(s) of the eye of
the exposed person. Such detailed spectral data of a light source are generally required only if the
4 -2
luminance of the source exceeds 10 cdm . At a luminance less than this value, the exposure limits
are expected to be not exceeded. The exposure limits are given in clause 4.3.
7
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
4.2 Specific factors involved in the determination and application of retinal exposure limits
8
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
grows roughly as the square root of time with time between 100 s and 10000 s, i.e., eff =
0,011(t/100), (note that the formula is not exact). The maximum value of the angular subtense, max,
is 0,1 radian for all retinal hazards in this standard. Thus note that above 10000 seconds eff is equal
to max.
For apparent sources subtending an angle above the maximum angular subtense, max, the EL for
retinal hazards are independent of the source size.
The angular subtense of an oblong source shall be determined by the arithmetic mean of the
maximum and minimum angular dimensions of the source. For example, for a 20 mm long by 3 mm
diameter tubular source at a viewing distance of r = 200 mm in a direction normal to the lamp axis
would be determined from the mean dimension, Z.
Z = (20+3)/2 = 11,5 mm.
Thus
= Z /r = 11,5/200 = 0,058 radian.
Any angular dimension larger than max shall be limited to max and any angular dimension smaller than
min shall be limited to min, prior to the determination of the arithmetic mean. Thus in the above
example if the linear distance was larger than 20 mm, only the 20 mm value would be used in the
calculation of the effective source size.
4.3.1 Actinic UV hazard exposure limit for the skin and eye
The limits for exposure to ultraviolet radiation incident upon the unprotected skin or eye apply to
exposure within any 8-hour period. Continuous exposure for times greater than 8 hours in any day
-2
need not be considered. The exposure limit for effective radiant exposure is 30 Jm .
To protect against injury of the eye or skin from ultraviolet radiation exposure produced by a broadband
source, the effective integrated spectral irradiance, Es, of the light source shall not exceed the levels
defined by:
400
Es t = E (,t ) S
200 t
UV ( ) t 30 Jm
-2
(4.1)
where:
-2 -1
E(,t) is the spectral irradiance in Wm nm ,
SUV() is the actinic ultraviolet hazard weighting function,
is the bandwidth in nm,
t is the exposure duration in seconds.
The actinic weighting function, SUV(), is shown in graphical form in Figure 4.1. Since the function
ranges over many orders of magnitude SUV() is shown logarithmically. In addition the spectral values
of SUV() are listed in Table 4.1.
The permissible time for exposure to ultraviolet radiation incident upon the unprotected eye or skin
shall be computed by:
30
t max = s (4.2)
Es
where:
tmax is the permissible exposure time in seconds,
-2
Es, is the effective ultraviolet irradiance in Wm .
9
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
Table 4.1 Spectral weighting function for assessing ultraviolet hazards for skin and eye.
1
Wavelength UV hazard function Wavelength UV hazard function
, nm SUV() , nm SUV()
200 0,030 313* 0,006
205 0,051 315 0,003
210 0,075 316 0,0024
215 0,095 317 0,0020
220 0,120 318 0,0016
225 0,150 319 0,0012
230 0,190 320 0,0010
235 0,240 322 0,00067
240 0,300 323 0,00054
245 0,360 325 0,00050
250 0,430 328 0,00044
254* 0,500 330 0,00041
255 0,520 333* 0,00037
260 0,650 335 0,00034
265 0,810 340 0,00028
270 1,000 345 0,00024
275 0,960 350 0,00020
280* 0,880 355 0,00016
285 0,770 360 0,00013
290 0,640 365* 0,00011
295 0,540 370 0,000093
297* 0,460 375 0,000077
300 0,300 380 0,000064
303* 0,120 385 0,000053
305 0,060 390 0,000044
308 0,026 395 0,000036
310 0,015 400 0,000030
1
Wavelengths chosen are representative: other values should be obtained by
logarithmic interpolation at intermediate wavelengths.
* Emission lines of a mercury discharge spectrum.
-2
EUVA 10 Wm (t 1000 s) (4.3b)
where:
-2 -1
E(,t) is the spectral irradiance in Wm nm ,
is the bandwidth in nm,
t is the exposure duration in seconds.
10
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
1E+00
1E-01
Spectral efficacy
1E-02
1E-03
1E-04
1E-05
200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400
Wavelength [nm]
The permissible time for exposure to ultraviolet radiation incident upon the unprotected eye for
times less than 1000 s, shall be computed by:
10000
t max s (4.4)
EUVA
Note: For eye exposure in the UV-A region ICNIRP, in 1989, changed the above EL to extend the
-2 2
radiant exposure of 10000 Jm from 1000 s to 10000 s (2,6 h) and to 1 W/m for 10000 s t
30000 s (8 h).
700
LB = L B( ) 100
300
Wm sr
-2 -1 4
(for t > 10 s) (4.5b)
where:
-2 -1 -1
L(,t) is the spectral radiance in Wm sr nm ,
B() is the blue-light hazard weighting function,
is the bandwidth in nm,
t is the exposure duration in seconds.
The blue-light spectral weighting function, B(), is shown in graphical form in Figure 4.2 along with the
retinal thermal weighting function, R(). Again, as in Figure 4.1, since the functions range over many
orders of magnitude the ordinate values are plotted logarithmically. In addition the spectral values of
B() and R() are listed in Table 4.2.
11
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
Table 4.2 Spectral weighting functions for assessing retinal hazards from broadband optical sources.
-2 -1
For a weighted source radiance, LB, exceeding 100 Wm sr , the maximum permissible exposure
duration, tmax, shall be computed:
106 4
t max = s (for t 10 s) (4.6)
LB
where:
tmax is the maximum permissible exposure duration in seconds,
LB is the blue-light hazard weighted radiance.
Note 1: The spectral radiance L shall be averaged over a right circular cone field-of-view of eff, as
described in clause 4.2.2.
12
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
1E+01
R
Spectral efficacy 1E+00
1E-01
1E-02
B
1E-03
1E-04
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
Wavelength [nm]
Note 2: In the case of multiple source elements that are not contiguous, this criterion applies to a
single source element. Also, it applies to the source as a whole when the average radiance
over the full source is used.
700
EB = E B( ) 1
300
Wm
-2
(for t > 100 s) (4.7b)
where:
-2 -1
E (,t) is the spectral irradiance in Wm nm ,
B() is the blue light hazard weighting function,
is the bandwidth in nm,
t is the exposure duration in seconds.
-2
For a source where the blue light weighted irradiance, EB, exceeds 0,01 Wm , the maximum
permissible exposure duration shall be computed:
100
t max = s (for t 100 s) (4.8)
EB
where:
tmax is the maximum permissible exposure duration in seconds,
EB is the blue light hazard weighted irradiance.
13
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
Note 1: Note that the exposure time at which EB becomes independent of time is 100 s rather than the
10000 s given for LB in Equation (4.6). The reason for this change is that for exposure times
greater than 100 s it was assumed that the diameter of the irradiated area of the retina
increases as the square root of time. Hence the effective irradiance of the retina decreases
and the retinal radiant exposure deposited becomes independent of time for exposure
durations between 100 s and 10 000 s due to the assumption of task-oriented eye movements.
This behaviour is shown in the graphical representation of EB in Figure 5.4.
Note 2: For ophthalmic instruments or for a stabilized eye during surgery where eye movements are
minimal the exposure time is extended to 10 000 s. This implies that in such cases the blue
-2 -2
light weighted irradiance should be 10 Wm , i.e.,100 times smaller than that given in
Equation (4.7b).
where:
-2 -1 -1
L is the spectral radiance in Wm sr nm ,
R() is the burn hazard weighting function,
t is the viewing duration (or pulse duration if the lamp is pulsed), in seconds,
is the bandwidth in nm,
is the angular subtense of the source in radians.
Note 1: L shall be averaged over a right circular cone field-of-view of not less than 0,0017 radian, and
not more than 0,1 radian, included angle.
Note 2: In the case of multiple source elements that are not contiguous, this criterion applies to a
single source element. Also it applies to the source as a whole when the average radiance
over the full source is used.
where:
-2 -1 -1
L is the spectral radiance in Wm sr nm ,
R() is the burn hazard weighting function,
is the bandwidth in nm,
t is the exposure time in seconds,
is the angular subtense in radians.
A weak visual stimulus is defined herein as one whose maximum luminance (averaged over a circular
-2
field-of-view subtending 0,011 radian) is less than 10 cdm .
Note 1: L shall be averaged over a right circular cone field-of-view of not less than 0,011 radian nor
more than 0,1 radian included angle.
14
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
Note 2: The limit expressed in Equations 4.11a and b is based upon a 7 mm diameter ocular pupil
because it is assumed that the source luminance is weak. For situations where the ambient
light can only be high, a pupil diameter of 3 mm may be assumed which implies that the EL
can be adjusted to higher values by the square of the ratio of the pupil diameters (a factor of
-2 -1
5,5), i.e., the EL can be increased to 33000/ Wm sr (see clause 4.2.1).
where:
-2 -1
E is the spectral irradiance in Wm nm ,
is the bandwidth in nm,
t is the exposure duration in seconds.
-2
Note 1: In cold environments, the limits for long time exposure may be increased to 400 Wm at 0C
-2
and 300 Wm at 10C for applications where infrared sources are used for radiant heating.
Note 2: The contribution from IR-C is already incorporated in these limits for all incandescent sources.
where:
-2 -1
E (,t) is the spectral irradiance in Wm nm ,
is the bandwidth in nm,
t is the exposure time in seconds.
Note: This exposure limit is based on skin injury due to a rise in tissue temperature and applies only
to small area irradiation. Exposure limits for periods greater than 10 s are not provided. Severe
pain occurs below the skin temperature required for skin injury, and an individual's exposure
normally will be limited for comfort. Large area irradiation and heat stress are not evaluated
since this involves consideration of heat exchange between the individual and the
environment, physical activity, and various other factors, which cannot be applied in a product
safety standard, but must be evaluated by environmental heat-stress criteria.
15
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
16
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
17
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
Figure 5.1 schematically shows the main concepts involved in making irradiance or spectral irradiance
measurements, including, if needed, the aperture to limit the field of view, of half angle, A, at some
distance from the receptor that is large with respect to the detector diameter.
The measurement shall be made in that position of the beam giving the maximum reading. The
instrument shall be calibrated to read in absolute incident radiant power per unit receiving area.
Note 1: From a practical point changing the input aperture requires significant extra work in re-
calibration of the radiometer or spectroradiometer. If the change of irradiance with distance is
known, one method of achieving the lower aperture requirement is to move the detector
aperture (assume 25 mm diameter is used) away from the source to a measurement distance
where the 7 mm aperture cone at a distance of 200 mm now fills the 25 mm aperture, i.e., a
distance about 3,5 times the standard evaluation distance.
Note 2: The measured irradiance should not be averaged over a smaller aperture than specified, as
this might result in an overestimation of the hazard. The minimum size of the averaging
aperture is related to physiological and behavioural factors that result in the averaging of the
incident radiation over a certain surface area.
Note 3: For a number of reasons, including the physiology of the eye, all the exposure levels for
ultraviolet radiation discussed in clause 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 apply to sources that subtend an angle
less than 80 degrees (1,4 radian), i.e., sources within 40 degrees of the normal to the
irradiance area. Thus emission from sources that subtend a greater angle need to be
measured only over a full angle of 80 degrees.
Irradiance measurements apply to the following hazards described in clause 4.3 of this standard.
315 nm 400 nm ocular exposure limit, EUVA
IR hazard exposure limit, EIR
Skin thermal hazard exposure limit, EH
Spectral irradiance measurements apply to the following hazards also described in clause 4.3 of this
standard.
200 400 nm skin and ocular exposure limit, ES
Retinal blue light hazard exposure limit small source, EB
A
Aperture
to lim it
field of
view
Detector
H >> D
D
18
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
H
D
Source
Detector/
Field Stop
eff
eff
The instrument shall be calibrated to read in absolute incident radiant power per unit receiving area
and per unit solid angle of acceptance averaged over the field of view (FOV) of the instrument.
Note: The measured radiance should not be averaged over a smaller field of view than specified, as
this might result in an overestimation of the hazard. The size of the averaging field of view is
related to the extent of eye movements that distribute the radiant power of the source image
over a larger area on the retina. The size of the averaging field of view eff is independent of
the source size . For sources that subtend an angle smaller than the specified field of view
eff, the averaged radiance value will be smaller than the actual physical radiance of the
source; however this biologically effective value is the appropriate value to be compared to the
exposure limit.
19
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
Spectral radiance measurements apply to the following hazards also described in clause 4.3 of this
standard.
Retinal blue light hazard exposure limit, LB
Retinal thermal exposure limit, LR
Retinal thermal exposure limit weak visual stimulus, LIR.
2 F2
E = L = L (5.4)
4 4r2
Source
r
Detector/
Aperture Stop
F
Field Stop
20
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
When using the irradiance measurements to obtain radiance values to compare against a given
hazard, the field stop diameter, F, must be set such that
= eff (5.5)
Note: The blue light hazard small-source-irradiance limit is equivalent to the radiance limit for the
specified measurement averaging field of view. The irradiance limit is derived by multiplying
the radiance limit with the averaging measurement field of view using Equation (5.4).
5.3.2 Calculations
The calculation of source hazard values shall be performed by weighting the spectral scan by the
appropriate function and calculating the total weighted energy. To provide a repeatable method this
standard suggests interpolation or summing to one nanometer (1 nm) for the spectra below 400 nm.
Weighting and summations are then performed at this 1 nm resolution. Above 400 nm, a step size of 5
nm is recommended.
21
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
Table 5.4 Summary of the ELs for the surface of the skin or cornea (irradiance based values)
Table 5.5 Summary of the ELs for the retina (radiance based values)
22
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
1E+07
1E+06
1E+09
1E+08
Radiance [Wm -2sr-1]
1E+07
1E+06
1E+05 L R_amin
R_amin
1E+04 LL R_amax
R_amax
L BB
1E+03
L
L IR_amin
IR_amin
1E+02 LL IR_amax
IR_amax
1E+01
1E-03 1E-02 1E-01 1E+00 1E+01 1E+02 1E+03 1E+04 1E+05
Time [sec]
Figure 5.5 Weighted radiance exposure limits vs. time
for constant exposure.
23
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
6. LAMP CLASSIFICATION
This standard was developed by CIE TC 6-47 with representation of IEC SC34A. This joint effort was
deemed important so that issues concerning risk group classification and distance at which the
photobiological hazard values due to lamp radiation are reported could be agreed upon. Since lamps
may be hazardous from several aspects, a classification scheme is helpful. For the purposes of this
standard it was decided that the values shall be reported as follows:
for lamps intended for general lighting service (GLS), see definition 3.11, the hazard values shall
be reported as either irradiance or radiance values at a distance which produces an illuminance of
500 lux, but not at a distance less than 200 mm;
for all other light sources, including pulsed lamp sources, the hazard values shall be reported at a
distance of 200 mm.
This clause is concerned with lamp classification. However a similar classification system could be
applicable to luminaires or other systems containing operating lamps. For lamps intended for general
lighting, the distance at which the irradiance measurements are made is left to the discretion of the
measurement facility.
The classification scheme indicates only the potential risk. Depending upon use factors, time of
exposure, and luminaire effects, these potential hazards may or may not actually become real hazards.
Table 6.1 summarizes the various irradiance and radiance emission limits for each of the hazards
discussed in clause 4.3 for each risk group classification.
Note: In some cases the same lamp may be used in both GLS and special applications and in such
cases should be evaluated and rated for the intended applications.
24
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
25
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
Table 6.1 Emission limits for risk groups of continuous wave lamps.
* Small source defined as one with < 0,011 radian. Averaging field of view at 10000 s
is 0,1 radian.
** Involves evaluation of non-GLS source
26
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
ANNEX A
(informative)
27
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
A.2.4 State of knowledge: Good acute threshold data available for rabbit (200 nm to 400 nm); for
monkey (200 nm to 320 nm); for man (200 nm to 300 nm). Data from different laboratories are
generally in good agreement.
A.2.5 Time course: Noticeable reaction generally delayed by 4 to 12 hours following the exposure,
the elapsed time depending upon how much difference in exposure and threshold, heavy
exposures producing reaction in shortest time; clearing in 24 to 48 hours, except for extremely
severe exposures.
A.2.6 Mechanism: Photochemical reaction initiates chain of biological reactions; details not
understood.
A.2.7 Symptoms: "Sand in the eye", blepharospasm (sudden, violent, involuntary contraction of
the muscles of the eyelid), some clouding of vision; reaction in the palpebral fissure (opening
between the upper and lower eyelids).
A.2.8 Needed information: Higher resolution of thresholds in 305 nm to 320 nm range; possibility of
delayed effects due to recurrent exposures.
A.2.9 Experience with lamps: Not uncommon accidental exposure from germicidal lamps and
mercury and xenon-arc lamps, but only in special applications. Limited population exposed.
A.2.10 Key references:
COGAN, D.G. and KINSEY, V.E. Action Spectrum of Keratitis Produced by Ultraviolet
Radiation. Arch. Ophthalmol., 35, 670-617 (1946).
HEDBLOM, E.E. Snowscape Eye Protection. Arch. Environ. Health, 2, 685-704 (1961).
LEACH. W. M. Biological Aspects of Ultraviolet Radiation, A Review of Hazards. BRH/DBE 70-
3, U.S. Public Health Service, Bureau of Radiological Health, Rockville, Maryland (Sept. 1970).
MACKEEN, D., FINE, S., AARON, A., and FINE, B.S. Preventable Hazards at UV
Wavelengths. Laser Focus, 7(4), 29 (1971).
PITTS, D.G. and TREDICI, T.J. The Effects of Ultraviolet on the Eye. Ameri. Ind. Hyg. Ass. J.
32(4), 235-246 (1971).
28
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
A.3.7 Symptoms: "Blind spot", or scotoma where the bright arc was imaged on the retina. A retinal
visible lesion (normally depigmented from blue light or hyperpigmented from some ultraviolet
wavelengths) is seen under ophthalmic examination within 48 hours post-exposure. Loss of
vision may be permanent, although recovery is noted in mild cases.
A.3.8 Needed information: More knowledge of injury mechanism; data at 400 nm to 450 nm for
exposure durations less than 10 seconds; data on additivity of multiple exposures and the
possibility of delayed effects from to recurrent exposures at levels below the acute threshold.
A.3.9 Experience with lamps: Extremely rare or largely unreported injuries due to excessive
exposure from staring at lamps. The natural aversion response normally limits exposure to
preclude photoretinitis. Limited population potentially exposed.
A.3.10 Key references:
HAM, W.T. Jr, MUELLER, H.A., and SLINEY, D.H. Retinal Sensitivity to Damage by Short-
Wavelength Light. Nature, 260(5547), 153-155 (1976).
HAM, W.T. Jr, RUFFOLO, J.J. Jr, MUELLER, H.A., and GUERRY, D. The Nature of Retinal
Radiation Damage: Dependence on Wavelength, Power Level and Exposure Time. Vision
Res., 20(12), 1105-1111 (1980).
MAINSTER, M.A. Spectral Transmission of Intraocular Lenses and Retinal Damage from
Intense Light Sources. Am. J. Ophthalmol., 85, 167-170 (1978).
MARSHALL, J. Light Damage and the Practice of Ophthalmology. In: Intraocular Lens
Implantation, Rosen E., Arnott, E., and Haining, W. (eds). London, Moseby-Yearbook, Ltd.
(1983).
PITTS, D.G. The Human Ultraviolet Action Spectrum. American Journal Optom. Physiol. Opt.,
51, 946-960 (1974).
SLINEY, D.H. Eye Protective Techniques for Bright Light. Ophthalmology, 90(8), 937-944
(1983).
SLINEY, D.H. and WOLBARSHT, M.L. Safety with Lasers and Other Optical Sources. New
York, Plenum (1980).
SPERLING, H.G. (ed). Intense Light Hazards in Ophthalmic Diagnosis and Treatment.
Proceedings of a Symposium, Vision Res., 20(12), 1033-1203 (1980).
VARMA, S.D. and LERMAN, S. (eds). Proceedings of the First International Symposium on
Light and Oxygen Effects on the Eye. Oxford: lRL Press (1984) [also published as Current Eye
Res., 3(1) (1984).]
WAXIER, M. and HITCHENS, V. (eds). Optical Radiation and Visual Health. Boca Raton, CRC
Press (1986).
WILLIAMS, T.B. and BAKER, B.N. (eds). The Effects of Constant Light on the Visual System.
New York, Plenum Press (1980).
YOUNG, R.W. A Theory of Central Retinal Disease. In: New Directions in Ophthalmic
Research, Sears, M.L. (ed). New Haven, Yale University Press, 237-270 (1981).
29
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
A.4.5 Time course: This mechanism of injury is dominant over photochemical retinal injury for
short (less than 10 seconds) exposures or at wavelengths greater than 700 nm. Noticeable
reaction is normally immediate (or within 5 minutes) following the exposure. Recovery is limited
or nonexistent.
A.4.6 Mechanism: Thermochemical reaction denatures proteins and other key biological
components of cells with destruction of biological tissue. Light absorption and initial injury
centered in retinal pigment epithelium and choroid.
A.4.7 Symptoms: "Blind spot" or scotoma where the bright source was imaged on the retina. A
retinal lesion visible (normally depigmented) is seen under ophthalmic examination normally
within 5 minutes, and certainly within 24 hours post-exposure. Loss of vision will be greatest
just after the exposure and some limited recovery may occur within 14 days.
A.4.8 Needed information: More data on large image size (> 1 mm) exposures.
A.4.9 Experience with lamps: Virtually no lamp is capable of causing this type of injury. A xenon arc
focussed into the eye can cause the effect as shown clinically. Hence the incidence must be
extremely rare or largely unreported injuries from staring at magnified xenon arc. Natural
aversion response normally limits exposure to preclude injury.
A.4.10 Key references:
ALLEN, R.A. Retinal Thermal Injury. Proc ACGlH Topical Symposium, 26-28 November 1979,
ACGlH, Cincinnati, Ohio (1980).
HAM, W.T. Jr, RUFFOLO, J.J. Jr, MUELLER, H.A., and GUERRY, D. The Nature of Retinal
Radiation Damage: Dependence on Wavelength, Power Level and Exposure Time. Vision
Res., 20(12), 1105-1111 (1980).
HAM, W.T. Jr, WILLIAMS, R.C., GEERAETS, W.J., MUELLER, H.A., GUERRY, D., CLARKE,
A.M., and GEERAETS, W.J. Effects of Laser Radiation on the Mammalian Eye. Trans. NY
Acad. Sci., 28, 517-526 (1966).
SLINEY, D.H. and WOLBARSHT, M.L. Safety with Lasers and Other Optical Sources. Plenum,
New York (1980).
30
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
A.5.8 Needed information: Action spectrum, if existent, for acute and effects for UV-A exposure;
additivity of multiple exposures and the possibility of delayed effects from recurrent exposures.
A.5.9 Experience with lamps: Accidental injury is known, even from exposure to xenon-arc lamps.
Limited population exposed.
A.5.10 Key references:
BRACHEM, A. Ophtalmic ultraviolet action spectra. Am. J. Ophtalm., 41, 969-976 (1956).
LERMAN, S. Radiant Energy and the Eye. Mac Millian, Inc., New York, (1980).
PARRISH, J.A., ANDERSON, R.R., URBACH, F., and PITTS, D. UV-A: Biological Effects of
Ultraviolet Radiation with Emphasis on Human Responses to Longwave Ultraviolet. Plenum
Press, New York (1978).
PITTS, D.G. The Ocular Ultraviolet Action Spectrum and Protection Criteria. Health Physics,
25, 559-566 (1973).
PITTS, D.G., CULLEN, A.P., and HACKER, P.D. Ocular Ultraviolet Effects from 295-1000 nm.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 16(10), 932-939 (1977).
SLINEY, D.H. Estimating the Solar Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure to an Intraocular Lens
Implant. J. Cataract Refract. Surg., 13, 296-301, May 1987.
SLINEY, D.H. Physical Factors in Cataractogenesis - Ambient Ultraviolet Radiation and
Temperature. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 27(5), 781-790, 1986.
TAYLOR, H.R., WEST, S.K., ROSENTHAL, F.S., MUNOZ, B., NEWLAND, H.S., ABBEY, H.,
and EMMETT, E.A. Effect of Ultraviolet Radiation on Cataract Formation. New England
Journal of Medicine, 319, 1429 (1988).
WAXIER, M. and HITCHENS, V. (eds). Optical Radiation and Visual Health. Boca Raton, CRC
Press (1986).
ZIGMAN, S., DATILES, M., and TORCYZNSKI, E. Sunlight and Human Cataracts. Invest.
Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 18(5), 462-467, 1979.
ZUCLICH, J.A. and CONNOLLY, J.S. Ocular Damage Induced by Near Ultraviolet Laser
Radiation. Invest. Ophthalmol., 15, 760-764 (1976).
31
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
A.6.9 Experience with lamps: Not uncommon accidental exposure from germicidal lamps and
mercury and xenon-arc lamps, but only in special applications. Intentional exposure from
sunlamp products.
A.6.10 Key references:
ANDERS, A., ALTHEIDE, H., KNALMANN, M., and TRONNIER, H. Action Spectrum for
Erythema in Humans Investigated with Dye Lasers. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 61, 200,
(1995).
COBLENTZ, W.W. and STAIR, R. Data on the Spectral Erythemic Reaction of the Untanned
Human Skin to Ultraviolet Radiation. Bur. Stand. J. Res., 8, 541 (1932).
COBLENTZ, W.W. and STAIR, R. Data on the Spectral Erythemic Reaction of the Untanned
Human Skin to Ultraviolet Radiation. Bur. Stand. J. Res., 12, 13-14 (1934).
COBLENTZ, W.W., STAIR, R., and HOGUE, J.M. The Spectral Erythemic Reaction of the
Human Skin to Ultraviolet Radiation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S., 17, 401-403 (June 1931).
FITZPATRICK, T.B., PATHAK, M.A., HARBER, L.C., SIEJI, M., and KUKITA, A. (eds).
Sunlight and Man. Tokyo, Tokyo University Press (1974).
th
FITZPATRICK, T.B. Dermatology in general medicine 5 ed. McGraw Hill, New York, pp.
1555-1561, (1999) and its references.
FREEMAN, R.G, OWENS, D.W., KNOX, J.M., and HUDSON, H.T. Relative Energy
Requirements for an Erythemal Response of Skin to Monochromatic Wavelengths of
Ultraviolet Present in the Solar Spectrum. J. Invest. Dermat., 64, 586-592 (1966).
HAUSSER, K.W. Influence of Wavelength in Radiation Biology. Strahlentherapie, 28, 25-44
(1928).
HAUSSER, K.W. and VAHLE, W. Sunburn and Suntanning. Wissenschaftliche
Verffentlichungen des Siemens Konzerns 6(1), 101-120 (1927), Translated in: Biologic
Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation (F. Urbach, ed), Pergamon Press, New York (1969).
HAWK ed. Photodermatology. Arnold, London, pp. 43-52, (1999) and its references.
ISO 17166:1999 / CIE S007 1998 Erythema reference action spectrum and standard
erythema dose.
van der LEUN, J.C. Theory of Ultraviolet Erythema. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 4, 453,
(1965).
LUCKIESH, M., HOLLADAY, L.L., and TAYLOR, A.H. Reaction of Untanned Human Skin to
Ultraviolet Radiation. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 20, 423-432 (1930).
PARRISH, J.A., JAENICKE, K.F. and ANDERSON, R.R. Erythema and melanogenesis action
spectrum of normal human skin. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 36, 187, 1982.
SCHMIDT, K. On the Skin Erythema Effect of UV Flashes. Strahlentherapie, 124, 127-136
(May 1964).
URBACH, F. (ed). The Biologic Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation. Pergamon Press, New York.
pp. 83-39, 327-436, 541-654, (1968).
World Health Organization. Ultraviolet Radiation. Environmental Health Criteria 14, WHO,
Geneva (1979).
32
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
ANNEX B
(informative)
MEASUREMENT METHOD
B.1 Instrumentation
33
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
Note: The measurement limit of a spectroradiometer is usually dominated by the noise limit of the
detector. The noise limit of the detector can be taken as the RMS variation in the detector dark
signal. The detectors noise limit is multiplied by the calibration spectrum for the system to give
a spectrum with the same dimensions as the measurements, called the "noise equivalent
input", NEI. The reported spectral measurement is the higher value at each wavelength of the
measured spectrum and the NEI.
A more complete analysis that takes the source spectrum into account may be used to relax the
suggested bandwidth accuracy. The results of the analysis must be included in the stated uncertainty
of the measurement.
Note: Systems that constantly integrate the signal during the spectral scan will not experience errors
in total measured power from spectral response shape or from the ratio of bandwidth to
reporting interval. Large bandwidths will still lead to errors in weighted results with this type of
instrument.
34
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
A more complete analysis that takes the source spectrum into account may be used to relax the
suggested wavelength accuracy. The results of analysis must be included in the stated uncertainty of
the measurement.
35
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
B.2.6 Linearity
The individual lamp or device under test must be assumed to have a different radiometric magnitude
than the source used to calibrate the testing system. For the calibration to be useful, the linearity of the
system must be known, and the test measurements must be performed within the range that is linear.
Non-linearity within the system may be corrected using a calibration function to bring the system to
linearity. Note that this adjustment must be applied to the calibration and the measurements.
36
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
ANNEX C
(informative)
UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS
The analysis of uncertainty requires that all sources of uncertainty be quantitatively evaluated. The first
step in uncertainty analysis is identifying the various uncertainty sources. Below is a list that can be the
start of the evaluation of uncertainty for measurements used in classifying lamps and lamp systems.
See further details in CIE 53 1982 Methods of characterizing the performance of radiometers and
photometers.
Instrument
Wavelength
Bandwidth
Response to varying spectra
Linearity
Stability
Stray light
Out-of-path
Out-of-band
Calibration
Standards (assigned uncertainty)
Distance
Alignment
Electrical operation
Measurement
Alignment
Distance
Source under test
Stability
Temperature
Size
Electrical operation
The individual uncertainty factors must be found or estimated. Each factor must then be propagated
through the measurement to find the impact on the weighted values used in hazard classification. As
seen in clause 5.3.3 above, the percent impact on the weighted values may be different from the
percent uncertainty of the individual factor. This is seen in the change in output from an incandescent
lamp as a function of the input current. The change in current changes the energy dissipated in the
lamp and therefore changes the lamps resistance and temperature. A change in current will not be
followed linearly by a change in lamps total output. Because of the change in temperature, the output
at a single wavelength may not follow the change in total output. Though the changes are not linear, for
small changes they can be considered linear. The normal way to propagate the uncertainty is to find
the amount of the final values change to the initial factors change. This ratio of the impact to the input
change is called sensitivity. For the incandescent lamp example, a change in the lamps current by a
small percent leads to a change in the output at the wavelength of interest as shown.
37
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
38
IS 16108 : 2012
IEC 62471 : 2006
ANNEX D
(informative)
GENERAL REFERENCES
ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists). TLVs and BEIs; Threshold Limit
Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents; Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, ACGIH.
ANSI/IESNA (American National Standard Institute / Illuminating Engineering Society of North
America) RP27.1-96. Recommended Practice for Photobiological Safety for Lamps General
Requirements. New York, IESNA 1996.
ANSI/IESNA (American National Standard Institute / Illuminating Engineering Society of North
America) RP27.2-00. Recommended Practice for Photobiological Safety for Lamps Measurement
Systems Measurement Techniques. New York, IESNA 2000.
ANSI/IESNA (American National Standard Institute / Illuminating Engineering Society of North
America) RP27.3-96. Recommended Practice for Photobiological Safety for Lamps Risk Group
Classification & Labeling. New York, IESNA 1996.
CIE 134/3 1999 Recommendation on Photobiological Safety of Lamps. A review of standards. In CIE
Collection in Photobiology and Photochemistry (1999).
CIE x016-1998 Measurements of Optical Radiation Hazards.
ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection). Guidelines on UV radiation
exposure limits. Health Physics 71, 978, (1996).
ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection). Guidelines on limits of
exposure to broadband incoherent optical radiation (0.38 to 3 m). Health Physics 73, 539-554, (1997).
IEC Technical Report 60825-9 Safety of laser products, Part 9: Compilation of maximum permissible
exposure to incoherent optical radiation, 1999.
IRPA/INIRC (International Non-Ionizing Radiation Committee). Guidelines on limits of exposure to
ultraviolet radiation of wavelengths between 180 nm and 400 nm (Incoherent optical radiation). Health
Physics 49, 331-340, (1985) and 56, 971-972, (1989).
KOSTKOWSKI, H.J. Reliable Spectroradiometry. Spectroradiometry Consulting, La Plata, MD (1997).
SLINEY, D.H. and WOLBARSHT, M.L. Safety with Lasers and Other Optical Sources. Plenum, New
York (1980).
___________
39
Bureau of Indian Standards
BIS is a statutory institution established under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 to promote
harmonious development of the activities of standardization, marking and quality certification of goods
and attending to connected matters in the country.
Copyright
BIS has the copyright of all its publications. No part of these publications may be reproduced in any form
without the prior permission in writing of BIS. This does not preclude the free use, in course of imple-
menting the standard, of necessary details, such as symbols and sizes, type or grade designations.
Enquiries relating to copyright be addressed to the Director (Publications), BIS.
Amendments are issued to standards as the need arises on the basis of comments. Standards are also
reviewed periodically; a standard along with amendments is reaffirmed when such review indicates that
no changes are needed; if the review indicates that changes are needed, it is taken up for revision. Users
of Indian Standards should ascertain that they are in possession of the latest amendments or edition by
referring to the latest issue of BIS Catalogue and Standards: Monthly Additions.
This Indian Standard has been developed from Doc No.: ETD 23 (6340).