Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 122 views

    People v. Iligan

    Uploaded by

    PrincessAngelaDeLeon
    Fernando Iligan was convicted of homicide for hacking Esmeraldo Quiñones Jr. with a bolo, even though the direct cause of death was being run over by a vehicle shortly after. The hacking triggered a chain of events that was the proximate cause of death. Edmundo Asis was acquitted because there was no proof he actively participated in or conspired to commit the assault.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    People v. Iligan

    Uploaded by

    PrincessAngelaDeLeon
    122 views2 pages
    Fernando Iligan was convicted of homicide for hacking Esmeraldo Quiñones Jr. with a bolo, even though the direct cause of death was being run over by a vehicle shortly after. The hacking triggered a chain of events that was the proximate cause of death. Edmundo Asis was acquitted because there was no proof he actively participated in or conspired to commit the assault.

    Original Description:

    digest

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Fernando Iligan was convicted of homicide for hacking Esmeraldo Quiñones Jr. with a bolo, even though the direct cause of death was being run over by a vehicle shortly after. The hacking triggered a chain of events that was the proximate cause of death. Edmundo Asis was acquitted because there was no proof he actively participated in or conspired to commit the assault.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    122 views2 pages

    People v. Iligan

    Uploaded by

    PrincessAngelaDeLeon
    Fernando Iligan was convicted of homicide for hacking Esmeraldo Quiñones Jr. with a bolo, even though the direct cause of death was being run over by a vehicle shortly after. The hacking triggered a chain of events that was the proximate cause of death. Edmundo Asis was acquitted because there was no proof he actively participated in or conspired to commit the assault.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    PEOPLE v.

    ILIGAN
    GR No. 75369 - Nov 26, 1990

    FACTS: At around 2:00 o'clock in the morning of August 4, 1980, Esmeraldo Quiones, Jr. and
    his companions, Zaldy Asis and Felix Lukban, were walking home after attending a barrio fiesta
    dance in Brgy. Sto. Domingo. In front of a ricemill, they met the accused Fernando Iligan, his
    nephew, Edmundo Asis, and Juan Macandog. Edmundo Asis pushed ("winahi") them aside
    thereby prompting Zaldy Asis to box him. Felix Lukban quickly told the other group that they
    had no desire to fight. However, Fernando Iligan, upon seeing his nephew fall, drew from his
    back a bolo and hacked Zaldy Asis but missed. Terrified, the trio ran pursued by the three
    accused. They ran for about half an hour, passing by the house of Quiones, Jr., seeing that they
    were no longer being chased, they stopped and rest. Quiones, Jr. invited the two to his house,
    while the trio were walking towards the house, the three accused suddenly emerged on the
    roadside and without a word, Fernando Iligan hacked Quiones, Jr. with his bolo hitting him on
    the forehead and causing him to fall down. Horrified, Felix Lukban and Zaldy Asis fled for about
    200 meters but later returned. The body of Quiones, Jr. was autopsied by the municipal health
    officer, Dr. Marcelito E. Abas. The postmortem examination report reveals that Esmeraldo
    Quiones, Jr., 21 years old, sustained injuries such as an incised wound at the right eyebrow,
    shock and massive cerebral hemorrhages due to multiple fracture of the entire half of the head
    among others. The death certificate also indicates that Quiones, Jr. died of "shock and massive
    cerebral hemorrhage due to a vehicular accident." Although they also already denied any
    involvement in the case saying that they were somewhere else when the incident happened and
    pleaded not guilty, the defense made capital of the testimony of prosecution witness Dr. Abas to
    the effect that Quiones, Jr. died because of a vehicular accident and not the hacking. Juan
    Macandog was never apprehended and he remained at large at the time of decision.

    ISSUE: 1) Whether Fernando Iligan is liable for the death of Esmeraldo Quiones, Jr.?
    2) Whether Edmundo Asis is liable for the death of Esmeraldo Quiones, Jr.?

    RULING: YES. Under Article 4 of the Revised Penal Code, criminal liability shall be incurred
    "by any person committing a felony (delito) although the wrongful act done be different from
    that which he intended." Based on the doctrine that "el que es causa de la causa es causa del
    mal causado" (he who is the cause of the cause is the cause of the evil caused).

    The essential requisites of Article 4 are: (a) that an intentional felony has been committed, the
    intentional felony committed was the hacking of the head of Quiones, Jr. by Iligan and (b) that
    the wrong done to the aggrieved party be the direct, natural and logical consequence of the
    felony committed by the offender. While Iligan's hacking of Quiones, Jr.'s head might not have
    been the direct cause, it was the proximate cause of the latter's death.

    Proximate legal cause is defined as "that acting first and producing the injury, either
    immediately or by setting other events in motion, all constituting a natural and continuous chain
    of events, each having a close causal connection with its immediate predecessor, the final event
    in the chain immediately effecting the injury as a natural and probable result of the cause which
    first acted.

    Considering the very short span of time between the hacking and the body being run over by a
    vehicle, it created one unbroken chain of events. Having triggered such events, Iligan cannot
    escape liability. Also the defense of alibi cannot turn the tide in favor of Iligan because he was
    positively seen at the scene of the crime and identified by the prosecution witnesses. Appellant
    Fernando Iligan is convicted of homicide with indeterminate penalty of 6 to 14 years. Appellant
    also has to compensate the heirs of Quiones, Jr. in the amount of P50, 000.

    Appellant Edmundo Asis is hereby acquitted of the crime charged against him. Proof beyond
    reasonable doubt has not been established to hold Edmundo Asis liable as Iligan's co-
    conspirator. Edmundo Asis did not take any active part in the infliction of the wound on the
    head of Quiones, Jr. which led to his running over by a vehicle and consequent death. There
    must be intentional participation in the act. Such being the case, his mere presence at the scene of
    the crime did not make him a co-conspirator, a co-principal or an accomplice to the assault
    perpetrated by Iligan.

    You might also like