28 Candano v. Sugata
28 Candano v. Sugata
28 Candano v. Sugata
_______________
* THIRD DIVISION.
222
223
VOL. 518, MARCH 13, 2007 223
Same; Same; Same; The formula for life expectancy has been
repeatedly adopted in our jurisprudence in fixing the amount of
indemnity for the death of a party; In several cases, the Supreme
Court reduced the life expectancy multiplier considering the medical
history such as when the deceased previously underwent a major
surgery or when it was shown that he was treated for chest pains,
backache or occasional feeling of tiredness and the fact that the
deceased has been consistently engaged in a dangerous and risky
activity tending to shorten his life.The argument raised by
Candano Shipping that the formula for determining the life
expectancy under Villa Rey cannot be automatically applied without
proof of the basis for the expected length of life of a Filipino does not
merit our consideration. The formula for life expectancy has been
repeatedly adopted in our jurisprudence in fixing the amount of
indemnity for the death of a party. This was adopted from the
American Expectancy Table of Mortality or the Actuarial of
Combined Experience Table of Mortality which was used by
insurers in determining the capital sum to be
224
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.:
225
2 Id., at p. 38.
3 Id., at p. 29.
4 Records, p. 199.
226
_______________
227
_______________
10 Article 391, New Civil Code. The following shall be presumed dead
for all purposes, including the division of the estate among the heirs:
228
_______________
229
_______________
230
_______________
231
_______________
232
_______________
233
234
pacity enunciated
23
in the case of Villa Rey v. Court of
Appeals, in computing the amount of actual damages to
be awarded to the claimant under Article 1711 of the New
Civil Code.
In Villa Rey, the common carrier was made liable for the
death of its passenger on board a passenger bus owned and
operated by Villa Rey Transit, Inc. going to Manila from
Lingayen, Pangasinan. While the bus was nearing
Sadsaran Bridge in Barrio Sto. Domingo, Minalin,
Pampanga, it frontally hit the rear side of bull cart filled
with hay and bamboo poles. The protruding end of one
bamboo pole, about eight feet long, penetrated through the
glass windshield of the bus and hit the face of Policarpio
Quintos, Jr.,
24
who was then sitting at the front row, causing
his death.
The obligation of the common carrier to indemnify its
passenger or his heirs for injury or death arose from the
contract of carriage
25
entered into by the common carrier and
the passenger. By the very nature26
of the obligation which
is imbued with public interest, in contract of carriage the
carrier assumes the express obligation to transport its
passenger to his destination safely and to observe
extraordinary diligence with due regard to all the
circumstances, and any injury that might be suffered by
the passenger is right away attributable to the fault or
negligence of the carrier and thus gives 27rise to the right of
the passenger or his heirs for indemnity.
In the same breadth, the employer shall be liable for the
death or personal injury of its employees in the course of
employment as sanctioned by Article 1711 of the New Civil
_______________
235
_______________
28 Article 1700, New Civil Code. The relations between capital and
labor are not merely contractual. They are so impressed with public
interest that labor contracts must yield to the common good. Therefore,
such contracts are subject to the special laws on labor unions, collective
bargaining, strikes and lockouts, closed shops, wages, working
conditions, hours of labor and similar subjects.
29 Article 2197. Damages may be:
236
_______________
237
_______________
34 Id., at p. 105.
35 432 Phil. 913, 925; 383 SCRA 341, 351 (2002).
238
_______________
239
VOL. 518, MARCH 13, 2007 239
Candano Shipping Lines, Inc. vs. Sugata-on
o0o
240