Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

School of Civil Engineering: (Assignment/Project Received Without This Declaration Form Will Not Be Graded)

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

EAA 204/2 STRUCTURES & STRENGTH OF MATERIALS LABORATORY


(2016/17)
S5: TENSILE TEST
Group B3
Group members:
1. HO KAR MENG 128853
2. SUA XING YONG 128909
3. MUHAMMAD IQBAL IZHAR BIN ZAKARIA 128874
4. MUHAMMAD NASRUL ASRAF BIN ROSLI 135523
5. AMARPREET KAUR A/P MAHINDER SINGH 135521

Lecturer Name: Dr. Fadzli Mohamed Nazri (FMN)


Date of submission: 11 October 2016
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Assignment/Project received without this declaration form will not be graded)

Declaration of Academic Honesty

Academic honesty or academic integrity is a very important virtue that all students should uphold
at all times.

We declare that the lab report submitted is not plagiarized and is entirely my/our own works, and
that no part of it has been copied from any work produced by other person(s) / source(s) or provided
by other student(s).

We understand that issuing a false declaration can result in severe penalties and we are willing to
be penalized if any form of copying found valid.

HO KAR MENG
SUA XING YONG
MUHAMMAD IQBAL IZHAR BIN ZAKARIA
MUHAMMAD NASRUL ASRAF BIN ROSLI
AMARPREET KAUR A/P MAHINDER SINGH

P a g e 1 | 12
CONTENTS
Aspect Page
1.1 Results
1.2 Observation And Calculation
1.3 Discussion
1.4 Conclusion

P a g e 2 | 12
1.1Results
MILD STEEL
Before Fracture After Fracture
Diameter (mm) 10.21 5.36
Overall Length (mm) 171.00 196.00
Gauge Length (mm) 64.00 86.00
2
Cross Sectional Area (mm ) 81.873 22.564
Table 1: Data of experiment for mild steel
HIGH TENSILE STEEL
Before Fracture After Fracture
Overall Length, L (m) 0.600 0.653
Mass, M (kg) 0.3582 0.3580
Gauge Length (mm) = 5d
50.00 62.00
(diameter of sample = Y10)
Cross Sectional Area, A (mm2)

= 0.00785 76.051 69.839
(MS 146: 2006)
Table 2: Data of experiment for high tensile steel

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MILD AND HIGH TENSILE TEST SPECIMEN


Mechanical Properties Mild Steel High Tensile Steel
Modulus of Elasticity (GPa) 2.028 2.090
Proportional Limit, A (MPa) 302.8035 522.9418
Upper Yield Stress, B (MPa) 326.2311 544.0144
Lower Yield Stress, C (MPa) 265.8853 542.9550
Tensile Strength, D (MPa) 365.3028 618.3503
Fracture Stress, E (MPa) 214.3943 441.0030
% Elongation (%) 34.375 24.000
% Reduction in Cross- Sectional Area (%) 72.440 8.168
Table 3: Mechanical properties of mild and high tensile steel

GRAPH PLOTTING
The graphs of stress against strain for mild steel and high tensile steel, with and without
extensometer are shown as below.

Remark:
A = Proportional Limit
B = Upper Yield Stress
C = Lower Yield Stress
D = Tensile Strength
E = Fracture Stress

P a g e 3 | 12
Graph of Stress against Strain for Mild Steel
400
D

350
B

300 A
C
250
E

200
Stress (MPa)

150

100

50

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

-50

-100
Strain (%)

Graph 1: Graph of stress against strain for mild steel

P a g e 4 | 12
Graph of Stress against Strain for Mild Steel (Extensometer)
400
D

350 B

300 A
C
250

E
200
Stress (MPa)

150

100

50

0
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000

-50

-100
Strain (%)

Graph 2: Graph of stress against strain for mild steel (extensometer)


P a g e 5 | 12
Graph of Stress against Strain for High Tensile Steel
700

600 C
B

500
A E

400
Stress (MPa)

300

200

100

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

-100
Strain (%)

Graph 3: Graph of stress against strain for high tensile steel

P a g e 6 | 12
Graph of Stress against Strain for High Tensile Steel (Extensometer)
700

600
B C

A
500
E

400
Stress (MPa)

300

200

100

0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000

-100
Strain (%)

Graph 4: Graph of stress against strain for high tensile steel (extensometer)
P a g e 7 | 12
1.2Observation And Calculation
A. Calculation
MILD STEEL
(i) Cross- sectional area before fracture, A0
2 (10.21)2
0 = = = 81.873
4 4

(ii) Cross- sectional area after fracture, A1


2 (5.36)2
1 = = = 22.564
4 4

(iii) Percentage elongation, X


1 ( ) 0 ( )
X= 100%
0 ( )
86.0064.00
= 100%
64.00
= 34.375 %

(iv) Percentage reduction in cross- sectional area, Y


0 1
Y= 100%
0
81.87322.564
= 81.873
100%
= 72.440 %

(v) Modulus of elasticity, E (Gradient of linear region)


Based on Graph 2,
At the point (0.136048, 302.8035) and (0.01584212, 59.03956),

E = =

302.8035 59.03956
=
0.136048 0.01584212

= 2.028GPa

P a g e 8 | 12
HIGH TENSILE STEEL
(i) Cross- sectional area before fracture, A0
0.3582
0 = = = 76.051
0.0075 0.00785(0.60)

(ii) Cross- sectional area after fracture, A1


0.3580
1 = = = 69.839
0.0075 0.00785(0.653)

(iii) Percentage elongation, X


1 ( ) 0 ( )
X= 100%
0 ( )
62.0050.00
= 100%
50.00
= 24.000 %

(iv) Percentage reduction in cross- sectional area, Y


0 1
Y= 100%
0
76.05169.839
= 76.051
100%
= 8.168 %

(v) Modulus of elasticity, E (Gradient of linear region)


Based on Graph 4,
At the point (0.2547234, 522.9418) and (0.0372378, 68.2885),

E = =

522.9418 68.2885
=
0.2547234 0.0372378

= 2.090 GPa

P a g e 9 | 12
B. Observation
MILD STEEL

P a g e 10 | 12
HIGH TENSILE STEEL

P a g e 11 | 12
1.3Discussion
1.4Conclusion

P a g e 12 | 12

You might also like