Nano-Dies For Cable Compacting - Why Do They Work?
Nano-Dies For Cable Compacting - Why Do They Work?
Nano-Dies For Cable Compacting - Why Do They Work?
A Nano-Die is constructed by first manufacturing a Tungsten Carbide die, then coating the working surface
of the die with two or three extremely fine layers of diamond in a CVD process. The crystalline structure at
the surface of a Nano-Die is quite different from the surface of a PCD die.
PCD material is manufactured with the particles pointing in all directions at random, with a range of particle
sizes distributed around the mean particle size.
Nano-Dies are manufactured with the same sized nanocrystalline diamond particles locked together in a
pattern. This is from where the Nano-Die derives its enormous hardness and strength.
When a Nano-Die fails, it is not like a Tungsten Carbide or PCD die in which a process of steady wear
causes the die to go out of tolerance. A Nano-Die holds +0 tolerance throughout its working life. When it
finally fails, it is due to collapse of the diamond surface caused by metal fatigue in the Tungsten Carbide
foundation material. A Nano-Die typically holds its diameter +0 for 500-800 km [say 300-500 miles] of
cable compacted. In some cases, the die will run for 1,000 km [say 620 miles] of cable compacted.
There are many variables in the process of cable compacting. What you want is to hit the
Cable Electrical Resistance Target every time. What you get is a spread of results, much
wider than you would like. It is not always easy to see exactly what factors are involved to cause
such a spread of results, but we suggest a few:
1. Nano-Dies hold +0 tolerance for 500 to 800 km of cable compacted (say 300 to 500 miles).
2. Nano-Dies have lower surface friction than PCD or Tungsten Carbide dies. Hence they do less
damage to the micro-structure of the individual conductors.
We really do not think that a die-maker has any place telling a cable manufacturer what he has to do next.
What follows is just to complete the picture. Of course it is not necessary to actually manufacture 2,000
reels of cable just to make the above points. But the discussion is statistical in nature, and statisticians love
big numbers. Back in the real world, cable manufacturers frequently adjust their designs incrementally,
based on just a few measurements. In any case, it is now possible to make small adjustments to the design of
the cable to optimize production for the new conditions presented as a result of using Nano-Dies. The dual
objective is (a) Manufacture of fully compliant cable and (b) Conservation of raw material.
If your plant is already using PCD dies for compacting and stranding, this does NOT mean that the above
benefits cannot be achieved. For larger diameters where PCD dies simply cannot be manufactured or are
simply too expensive to even consider, Nano-Dies provide the full benefits noted above.
For the smaller diameters where PCD dies are still sometimes used, Material Utilization improvements up to
1-2% are achievable by replacing PCD dies with Nano-Dies. In other words, PCD dies are better than
Tungsten Carbide dies, but their performance in cable compacting and stranding is still inferior to the
performance of Nano-Dies. 1-2% raw material saving is highly significant. And please keep in mind that
the cost of a Nano-Die is 3-6 times less than the cost of the equivalent PCD die.