Nurul Puteri Utami F1021151022 B+
Nurul Puteri Utami F1021151022 B+
Nurul Puteri Utami F1021151022 B+
F1021151022
B+
1. According Nunan, Anna Maria Pinter and Cameron: What are the characteristics of
young learners? and how do those characteristics influence the English learning and
teaching process?
2. Children are better language learners. What does the statement imply, and how does
3. Mention some challenges of English teaching and learning at the young learners?
4. Choose one method of teaching English to young learners, and how is the procedure of
ELT?
5. What are the main problems of ELT to young learners? (Describe your own experience
or other teachers)
Answer
According to Nunan, Anna Maria Pinter and Cameron, the characteristics of young
learners are:
1. Young learners have a holistic approach to language, which means, that they are
2. Young learners have lower levels of awareness about themselves as well as about
3. Young learners have limited reading and writing skills even in their first language.
How do those characteristics influence the English learning and teaching process?
From the characteristics above, we can conclude that characteristics of young learners
influence the teaching-learning process, the teacher should know the characteristics of
their students before they want to get involved in the teaching and learning process. in
order, they can give their best for their students and to avoid the following
2. Children are better language learners. What does the statement imply?
Young learners are commonly believed to be better language learners than adults.
Children are able to achieve complete knowledge of second and additional language,
and, above all, they usually acquire a native like accent. This concept is at the basis of
the Critical Period Hypothesis, the origins of which date back to Eric Lenneberg (1967),
Hypothesis, there is an age related point on which, current researchers diverge, but it is
usually within the puberty period, beyond which it becomes difficult or impossible to
attain a native speaking like competence. Lenneberg (1967) sees the critical period
starting at the age of 2 and ending around puberty, a period, which coincides with the
the brain language functions. Lenneberg (1967) cited a wide evidence of changes in the
brain taking place during this period. However, his claim was at a later stage criticised
by other researchers, who undertook several studies and reinterpreted the relevant data
concluding that the process is already complete before puberty. The Critical Period
Hypothesis still remains an actively and widely debated matter among researchers of
SLA. Most studies, related to its investigation, have focused on examining morphsyntax
and pronunciation in adult learners. A well-known study, which has been cited as proof
Johnson and Newport in 1989, designed to assess the differences in the acquisition of
syntax by learners and examine adult learners performance. The age range of the
participants on the arrival in the US was between 3 and 39. The study found that there
was a steady decline from the age of 7 in judging grammatical and ungrammatical
items. This decline showed to be stable until the age of 17 at which point performance
evened up, showing no more association with age. However, Bialystok and Hakuta
(1994) advanced various criticisms with regards to the methodology applied. Firstly,
they argued that the length of stay (5 years) might not have been enough to reach
ultimate attainment levels; secondly, the test itself might have been too long given the
276 items involved. Moreover, they argued, age of arrival was in some ways confused
with the age when the test was taken. Nevertheless, De Keyser (2000), addressed these
criticisms and obtained similar results to the Johnson and Newports study. Therefore,
L2 learners and language success due to the Critical Period. In 2001, Birdsong and
Molis replicated the study of Johnson and Newport 1989, by applying the identical
methods and materials of the original test, but employing a sample of Spanish native
speakers. In line with most recent research, in this study too, age proved to be negatively
AoA (age of acquisition), which differs from age of first exposure, which can occur in
a schooling context, contact with L2 relatives and so forth, is the strongest predictor of
and Larson-Hall (2005). A general agreement seems to have been reached among
researchers with regards to older individuals not able to achieve a native like accent. In
fact, abundant evidence seems to support this view. One of the most cited studies which
focuses on L2 phonetics acquisition is the study carried out by Tahta Wood and
Lowenthal (1981). The researchers found that American childrens ability to reproduce
intonational patterns in French and Armenian, declined after the age of 8. However,
most recently, Mackay, Fledge and Imai (2006) examined the degree of foreign accent
a different age of arrival. The investigation, found that the difference of foreign accent
among early and late learners was not due to chronological age, therefore maturational
constraints and The Critical Period Hypothesis factors were excluded. Age of arrival
was found to affect foreign accent due to the development of the native language
phonetic system. Yet, results originated from most studies, pinpoint age as the most
comes to the acquisition of phonology. However, it has been argued that such evidence
is limited in terms of culture, society and language as most of studies have mainly
focused on the English language acquisition and secondly on other European languages.
Despite these limitations, it can be said that at least in the developed world, children
conclude, in agreement with Birdsong (1999), the main reasons, strictly related to the
age factor, will be summarised below. None of them remain unchallenged: (1) Loss of
access to UG after the puberty period, (2) Loss of neural plasticity, causing the neural
substrate needed for language learning to be no longer fully available later in life. (3)
Teaching through activities can be applied in the classroom. The use of various
activities in the classroom to teach a foreign language has a great impact on learners.
Particularly, young learners would love to learn by means of activities as such kind of
and interesting. Types of activities that can be used in the classroom can be a project
work, drawing, colouring, cutting out, making things, solving problems, recording
information etc. The reason behind such activities is that learners learn by doing, by
being actively involved in their learning; and it creates opportunities for them to use
their imagination and creativity. In conducting these activities learners get involved in
the learning process and become aware of learning how to learn, which is quite
important for them. The following lists some of the major activities that can be
-TPR activities
- Listen and do, listen and repeat, listen and draw a routeetc.
- Problem solving
- Sort it out
- Pairwork/Groupwork
- Playing pretend games (drama) with masks, puppets, toys, play dough figures etc.
- Tongue-twisters
3. Mention some challenges of English teaching and learning at the young learners!
1. Speaking
Teaching children to speak English can be difficult, and so can trying to make the
children speak. They very often feel insecude and only want to communicate with
their peers.
2. Discipline
This was linked to age and sex of the students, parental attitudes, inexperience, not
sharing the learners first language and keeping the students motivated in class.
3. Motivation
Some teachers found that young learners do not understand or appreciate the
purpose of learning English, and this attitude can be further emphasized by their
4. Differentiation
Teachers are dealing with students who are at different stages of learning, and each
student has different individual needs. This is very evident with students with
learning disabilities.
5. Writing
Many children are not prepared to learn an entirely new script of writing.
6. Grammar
Children become easily bored with this and do not understand what the purpose
7. Class size
This was ranked as the second most important factor in improving teaching and
learning in schools. When the class is too large, the teacher then has difficulty
5. You can extend this by saying 'hop to the cat' or even 'if you have blonde hair, swim
6. You can also incorporate flash cards into a game of Simon Says. 'Simon says, jump