Rodolfo Cruz and Esperanza Ibias (petitioners) appealed the decision of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) that ordered them to pay Atty. Delfin Gruspe (respondent) P220,000 plus interest stemming from a car accident. The Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC's decision with modification. The Supreme Court case involves the petition for review of the Court of Appeals' decision. The case arose when a mini bus owned by Cruz and driven by another person collided with Gruspe's car, totaling it. The next day, Cruz and Leonardo Ibias signed a joint affidavit promising to replace the car within 20 days or pay P350,000, with 12% monthly interest for delayed payment
Rodolfo Cruz and Esperanza Ibias (petitioners) appealed the decision of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) that ordered them to pay Atty. Delfin Gruspe (respondent) P220,000 plus interest stemming from a car accident. The Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC's decision with modification. The Supreme Court case involves the petition for review of the Court of Appeals' decision. The case arose when a mini bus owned by Cruz and driven by another person collided with Gruspe's car, totaling it. The next day, Cruz and Leonardo Ibias signed a joint affidavit promising to replace the car within 20 days or pay P350,000, with 12% monthly interest for delayed payment
Rodolfo Cruz and Esperanza Ibias (petitioners) appealed the decision of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) that ordered them to pay Atty. Delfin Gruspe (respondent) P220,000 plus interest stemming from a car accident. The Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC's decision with modification. The Supreme Court case involves the petition for review of the Court of Appeals' decision. The case arose when a mini bus owned by Cruz and driven by another person collided with Gruspe's car, totaling it. The next day, Cruz and Leonardo Ibias signed a joint affidavit promising to replace the car within 20 days or pay P350,000, with 12% monthly interest for delayed payment
Rodolfo Cruz and Esperanza Ibias (petitioners) appealed the decision of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) that ordered them to pay Atty. Delfin Gruspe (respondent) P220,000 plus interest stemming from a car accident. The Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC's decision with modification. The Supreme Court case involves the petition for review of the Court of Appeals' decision. The case arose when a mini bus owned by Cruz and driven by another person collided with Gruspe's car, totaling it. The next day, Cruz and Leonardo Ibias signed a joint affidavit promising to replace the car within 20 days or pay P350,000, with 12% monthly interest for delayed payment
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
G.R. No.
191431 March 13, 2013
RODOLFO G. CRUZ and ESPERANZA IBIAS,
Petitioners, vs. ATTY. DELFIN GRUSPE, Respondent. D E C I S I O N BRION, J.: Before the Court is the petition for review on certiorar i 1 filed under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, assailing the decision 2 dated July 30, 2009 and the resolution 3 dated February 19, 2010 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 86083. The CA rulings affirmed with modification the decision dated September 27, 2004 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Bacoor, Cavite, Branch 19, in Civil Case No. BCV-99-146 which granted respondent Atty. Delfin Grupe’s claim for payment of sum of money against petitioners Rodolfo G. Cruz and Esperanza Ibias. 4 THE FACTUAL BACKGROUND The claim arose from an accident that occurred on October 24, 1999, when the mini bus owned and operated by Cruz and driven by one Arturo Davin collided with the Toyota Corolla car of Gruspe; Gruspe’s car was a total wreck. The next day, on October 25, 1999, Cruz, along with Leonardo Q. Ibias went to Gruspe’s office, apologized for the incident, and executed a Joint Affidavit of Undertaking promising jointly and severally to replace the Gruspe’s damaged car in 20 days, or until November 15, 1999, of the same model and of at least the same quality; or, alternatively, they would pay the cost of Gruspe’s car amounting to P350,000.00, with interest at 12% per month for any delayed payment after November 15, 1999, until fully paid. 5 When Cruz and Leonardo failed to comply with their undertaking, Gruspe filed a complaint for collection of sum of money against them on November 19, 1999 before the RTC. In their answer, Cruz and Leonardo denied Gruspe’s allegation, claiming that Gruspe, a lawyer, prepared the Joint Affidavit of Undertaking and forced them to affix their signatures thereon, without explaining and informing them of its contents; Cruz affixed his signature so that his mini bus could be released as it was his only means of income; Leonardo, a barangay official, accompanied Cruz to Gr uspe’s office for the release of the mini bus, but was also deceived into signing the Joint Affidavit of Undertaking. Leonardo died during the pendency of the case and was substituted by his widow, Esperanza. Meanwhile, Gruspe sold the wrecked car for P130,000.00. In a decision dated September 27, 2004, the RTC ruled in favor of Gruspe and ordered Cruz and Leonardo to pay P220,000.00, 6 plus 15% per annum from November 15, 1999 until fully paid, and the cost of suit.