Obsgyn 4
Obsgyn 4
Obsgyn 4
Abstract
Background: Preeclampsia and intrauterine fetal growth restriction (IUGR) are two of the most common causes
of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Current methods of predicting those at most risk of these
conditions remain relatively poor, and in clinical practice past obstetric history remains the most commonly used
tool. Aspirin and, in women at risk of preeclampsia only, calcium have been demonstrated to have a modest effect
on risk reduction. Several observational studies and randomised trials suggest that low molecular weight heparin
(LMWH) therapy may confer some benefit.
Methods/design: This is a multicentre open label randomised controlled trial to determine the effect of the
LMWH, enoxaparin, on the prevention of recurrence of preeclampsia and/or IUGR in women at high risk due to
their past obstetric history in addition to standard high risk care for all participants.
Inclusion criteria: A singleton pregnancy >6+0 and <16+0 weeks gestation with most recent prior pregnancy with
duration >12 weeks having; (1) preeclampsia delivered <36+0 weeks, (2) Small for gestational age (SGA) infant <10th
customised birthweight centile delivered <36+0 weeks or, (3) SGA infant ≤3rd customised birthweight centile
delivered at any gestation. Randomisation is stratified for maternal thrombophilia status and women are randomly
assigned to ‘standard high risk care’ or ‘standard high risk care’ plus enoxaparin 40 mg from recruitment until 36+0
weeks or delivery, whichever occurs sooner. Standard high risk care includes the use of aspirin 100 mg daily and
calcium 1000–1500 mg daily (unless only had previous SGA with no preeclampsia).
The primary outcome is preeclampsia and/or SGA <5th customised birthweight centile. Analysis will be by intention
to treat.
Discussion: The EPPI trial has more focussed and clinically relevant inclusion criteria than other randomised trials
with a more restricted composite primary outcome. The inclusion of standard use of aspirin (and calcium) for all
participants will help to ensure that any differences observed in outcome are likely to be related to enoxaparin use.
These data will make a significant contribution to future meta-analyses and systematic reviews on the use of LMWH
for the prevention of placental mediated conditions.
(Continued on next page)
* Correspondence: k.groom@auckland.ac.nz
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical Health
Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
2
National Women’s Health, Auckland City Hospital, Private Bag 92024,
Auckland, New Zealand
© The Author(s). 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Groom et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (2016) 16:367 Page 2 of 7
Study groups
Women will be assigned to one of two groups; Group
one will receive ‘standard high risk care’ and Group two
will receive ‘standard high risk care’ and enoxaparin
40 mg sc (Clexane®, Sanofi-Aventis) [42] daily from re-
cruitment (at gestational age >6+0 and <16+0 weeks)
until 36+0 weeks or delivery, whichever occurs sooner.
Standard high risk care is defined as care co-ordinated
by a high risk antenatal clinic service, aspirin 100 mg Fig. 1 Individual participant trial schedule
daily until 36+0 weeks and calcium 1000–1500 mg daily
until 36+0 weeks (unless only had previous SGA with no
preeclampsia as eligibility criteria). This is an open-label whichever is later), episode of threatened preterm labour
randomised study and all participants, clinicians and (treatment can be recommenced if symptoms settle), clin-
investigators will be aware of study group assignment. ical evidence of placental abruption or thrombocytopenia
with platelet count <80 × 109/L.
Obstetric care and trial procedure (Fig. 1) Antenatal, intra-partum and postnatal care will be pro-
All women will have serum samples taken at recruit- vided by the local obstetric team caring for each woman.
ment, 20 and 30 weeks gestation. Samples will be centri- Pregnancy, labour, postnatal and neonatal data will be
fuged and stored in −80 °C freezer for later assessment collected by research staff from maternal and infant
of placental and angiogenic growth factors (Table 1). At clinical records up to the time of hospital discharge.
the time of fetal anatomy scan, standard fetal growth
parameters [43, 44] and uterine and umbilical arterial Study outcomes
Doppler waveforms [45] will be recorded. These ultra- The primary outcome is the incidence of preeclampsia
sound measurements will be repeated at 24 weeks’ gesta- and/or small for gestational age (SGA) <5th customised
tion. Data from any additional antenatal ultrasound scans birthweight centile [46]. Preeclampsia will be defined as
will also be collected. new onset hypertension (systolic BP ≥140 mmHg and/or
For women receiving LMWH, an educational session diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg) arising after 20 weeks gestation
regarding injection technique will be provided by a re- with evidence of significant proteinuria (dipstick protein-
search midwife prior to treatment commencement. uria (≥1+) subsequently confirmed by spot urine pro-
LMWH injections will be re-supplied on a monthly basis tein/creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/mmol and/or 24 h urine
from hospital pharmacies. Treatment will continue until protein excretion >0.3 g) or any multi-system complica-
36+0 weeks but additional safety indications to stop tion including haematological, liver, renal and neuro-
treatment sooner include; need for delivery prior to 36+0 logical involvement [47]. IUGR is difficult to define and
weeks (stop once decision made for delivery or 12 h measure and so SGA defined by customised birthweight
prior to induction of labour or elective caesarean section, centiles will be used as the most reproducible surrogate.
Groom et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (2016) 16:367 Page 5 of 7
Table 1 EPPI trial key secondary study outcomes a difference between 25 and 4%. The DMC will report to
Combined Preeclampsia and/or SGA <10th centile the trial investigator group and may advise discontinu-
Preeclampsia and/or SGA <10th centile ation of the trial if there is an excess of serious adverse
delivered <35+6 weeks
Preeclampsia and/or SGA <10th centile events in the LMWH treatment group or if a significant
delivered <33+6 weeks benefit is already demonstrated. Results of the interim
Preeclampsia and SGA <10th centile analysis will only be known to members of the DMC
delivered at any gestation
and the trial investigator group. Responsibility for early
Maternal Preeclampsia discontinuation of the trial will ultimately rest with the
Severe preeclampsia
Placental abruption trial investigator group.
Caesarean section delivery
Antepartum haemorrhage Data analysis
Postpartum haemorrhage <500mls
and <1000mls All data will be collected and stored under de-identified
Infant SGA <10th centile
study ID. Data will be analysed by an independent statis-
SGA <5th centile tician. Population characteristics between the groups will
SGA <3rd centile be compared initially to identify any potential confound-
Unexplained intrauterine fetal death
Stillbirth
ing variables. Data will be analysed on an intention to
Gestational age at delivery treat basis comparing primary and secondary outcomes
Mean birthweight in both groups. Analyses will make adjustment for
Mean birthweight centile
recruiting site and thrombophilia status. P-value <0.05
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission
Neonatal death will be considered significant.
Uteroplacental Abnormal uterine artery Doppler
waveform at 20 or 24 weeks Discussion
Abnormal umbilical artery Doppler This is a protocol for a randomised trial to assess the
waveform at 20 or 24 weeks
role of the LMWH, enoxaparin, to prevent recurrence of
Placental & angiogenic growth soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) preeclampsia and IUGR in women at high risk based on
factors soluble endoglin (soluble Eng)
Endothelin-1 (ET-1) their past obstetric history. The EPPI trial has been de-
Placental growth factor (PLGF) signed to focus specifically on the related conditions of
soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule preeclampsia and IUGR. The inclusion criteria aim to
1 (VCAM1)
identify women with or without thrombophilia but do
SGA small for gestational age, all SGA measured by customised birthweight
centile [46]
not include less specific or poorly defined conditions
such as past venous thromboembolism, recurrent mis-
carriage, unexplained fetal death and placental abruption
Customised centiles adjusting for infant sex, gestation at as seen in some other trials of heparin therapy for the
delivery and maternal variables—parity, ethnicity, height prevention of preeclampsia and IUGR. The pathological
and weight will be used [46]. The key secondary study mechanisms of such a wide variety of conditions are
outcomes are shown in Table 1. likely to be significantly different from those of pre-
eclampsia and IUGR and a single preventative therapy
Sample size less likely to be effective for all. Similarly the composite
We have estimated a risk of recurrence of preeclampsia primary outcome measure for this study has been lim-
and/or SGA < 5th customised centile for the included ited to preeclampsia and a measure of IUGR (SGA) so
population of 25% when managed routinely with aspirin results are more likely to be relevant to these placental
(and calcium). A trial of 160 participants, allowing for a mediated conditions.
5% drop-out/early miscarriage rate will have 80% power Another strength of this study is that both treatment
at a two-sided significance level of 0.05 to detect a differ- arms will receive standard high risk care including the
ence between 25 and 7% [37]. use of aspirin in all women and, for those with previous
history of preeclampsia, the use of calcium. Any differ-
Data monitoring committee (DMC) and interim analysis ences observed in outcome are likely to be related to
An independent DMC comprising of a statistician, ob- enoxaparin use.
stetrician, and obstetric physician with clinical trials ex- This study will include 160 women and is one of the
perience will review serious adverse events. They will larger studies in this area. The findings of this trial will
review the results of an interim analysis once 98 partici- be available for future meta-analysis and systematic re-
pants have been recruited and completed pregnancy. A views. It will significantly contribute to and further
study group of 49 participants in each arm will have 80% current knowledge regarding the use enoxaparin in preg-
power at a two-sided significance level of 0.05 to detect nancy to reduce recurrence of preeclampsia and IUGR.
Groom et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (2016) 16:367 Page 6 of 7