Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 74 views

    G / N - G C - E A: O O O Heckpoint ND of Nalysis

    Uploaded by

    ozzy75
    This document summarizes a go/no-go checkpoint at the end of the analysis stage of a project. It includes questions about whether business and technical problems were addressed, risks identified, and the client engaged. It also reviews the project estimate history. Based on responses, a recommendation is made on whether the project should proceed to the design stage. Key risks or estimate variances require documentation before approval to move forward.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    G / N - G C - E A: O O O Heckpoint ND of Nalysis

    Uploaded by

    ozzy75
    74 views4 pages
    This document summarizes a go/no-go checkpoint at the end of the analysis stage of a project. It includes questions about whether business and technical problems were addressed, risks identified, and the client engaged. It also reviews the project estimate history. Based on responses, a recommendation is made on whether the project should proceed to the design stage. Key risks or estimate variances require documentation before approval to move forward.

    Original Description:

    Project Checkpoint

    Original Title

    Checkpoint

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes a go/no-go checkpoint at the end of the analysis stage of a project. It includes questions about whether business and technical problems were addressed, risks identified, and the client engaged. It also reviews the project estimate history. Based on responses, a recommendation is made on whether the project should proceed to the design stage. Key risks or estimate variances require documentation before approval to move forward.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    74 views4 pages

    G / N - G C - E A: O O O Heckpoint ND of Nalysis

    Uploaded by

    ozzy75
    This document summarizes a go/no-go checkpoint at the end of the analysis stage of a project. It includes questions about whether business and technical problems were addressed, risks identified, and the client engaged. It also reviews the project estimate history. Based on responses, a recommendation is made on whether the project should proceed to the design stage. Key risks or estimate variances require documentation before approval to move forward.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 4

    GO / NO-GO CHECKPOINT - END OF ANALYSIS

    Purpose: This purpose of the Go/No-Go Checkpoint – End of Analysis is to decide if the project should proceed to the
    Design stage. In order to make this determination, the Delivery Manager (DM) should compile information below and then
    setup a Go / No Go meeting with the Delivery Director to review the results. Based on the information gathered, a
    recommendation will be made as to whether or not the project is still viable and should proceed. The DM and Delivery Director
    may seek the Executive Director’s approval for the recommendation. Once completed and approved (email approval is fine),
    this document must be filed in PPM.

    Project Number << DTC Number >> Project Name

    Project Manager Delivery Manager

    Delivery Health

    # QUESTION RESPONSE COMMENTS


    Was consideration given to the impact of change on the
    organization and its business processes (i.e. were the Yes No
    1.
    activities required to for Business Reengineering been
    included in the Analysis)?
    Have “change” tasks needed been factored into the time/cost
    2. estimate for future stages? Yes No

    At the end of this stage of the SDLC, is the Problem


    Statement still valid? Are the problems being addressed?
    Consider the following when responding:
    3. Yes No
    ü Business Problem
    ü Technical Problem
    ü Organization Readiness

    Project Go-No Go Checkpoint – End of Analysis Page 1 of 4


    Template Version 1.0 2017-03-31
    # QUESTION RESPONSE COMMENTS
    ü Capacity of the OCIO to deliver

    Have all potential risks been identified?


    4. If no, identify additional risks. Yes No

    Is the vendor performing as expected?


    5. If not, identify any issues or concerns. Yes No

    Are there any issues related to the project management of


    this project? Consider the following in your response:
    ü Timeliness of deliverables
    6. Yes No
    ü Client relationships
    ü Scope Creep

    Has the client/project sponsor been engaged /committed


    7. throughout this stage? Yes No

    Are there any concerns with client availability in future


    8. project stages? Yes No

    Are there any reasons why this project should not proceed to
    9. the next SDLC stage? If so, identify. Yes No

    Estimate History
    At the end of the Analysis stage, the Project Estimate History in PPM should be updated, exported to Excel and embedded / attached to this
    document:

    << Embed or attach document >>

    Project Go-No Go Checkpoint – End of Analysis Page 2 of 4


    Template Version 1.0 2017-03-31
    RECOMMENDATION TO PROCEED TO DESIGN STAGE
    (NOTE: This section should not be completed until after a consultation meeting has been held with the Delivery Manager and
    Director to review the contents of this document).

    Recommendation to Proceed Yes No

    <<Provide rationale for decision from both a Delivery Health and Estimate History perspectives. Significant risks (Delivery Health) or
    variances (Estimate History) are recommended to be documented in Decision Document format. >>

    PREPARED BY
    Delivery Manager

    (Print name) (signature) (date)

    REVIEWED / APPROVED BY
    Delivery Director
    (Print name) (signature) (date)

    Executive Director (as required)


    (Print name) (signature) (date)

    Project Go-No Go Checkpoint – End of Analysis Page 3 of 4


    Template Version 1.0 2017-03-31
    Project Go-No Go Checkpoint – End of Analysis Page 4 of 4
    Template Version 1.0 2017-03-31

    You might also like