En 1999-1-1 2007 - A1 2009 PDF

EUROPEAN STANDARD EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1
NORME EUROPÉENNE
EUROPÄISCHE NORM July 2009
ICS 91.010.30; 91.080.10
English Version
Eurocode 9: Design of aluminium structures - Part 1-1: General

structural rules
Eurocode 9: Calcul des structures en aluminium - Partie 1- Eurocode 9: Bemessung und Konstruktion von
1: Règles générales Aluminiumtragwerken - Teil 1-1: Allgemeine
Bemessungsregeln
This amendment A1 modifies the European Standard EN 1999-1-1:2007; it was approved by CEN on 12 March 2009.
T
M I
CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for inclusion of this
amendment into the relevant national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such
U N
national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN Management Centre or to any CEN member.
EN
This amendment exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation under the
responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN Management Centre has the same status as the official
K D
versions.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland,
France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal,
O A
Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom.

D R
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION

COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels
© 2009 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009: E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
Radni dokumenti za HZN/TO 548
HZN/TO 548 - Drazen Anicic; Pripremljeno: 2010-12-21
Namijenjeno iskljucivo za rad HZN/TO 548. Primjena u druge svrhe STROGO ZABRANJENA
EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
Foreword
This document (EN 1991-1-1:2005/A1:2009) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 250
“Structural Eurocodes”, the secretariat of which is held by BSI.
This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an
identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by July 2010, and conflicting national standards shall be
withdrawn at the latest by January 2010.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN [and/or CENELEC] shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent
rights.
According to the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the
following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus,
Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy,
T
Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia,
M I
Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom.
U N
EN
K D
O A
R
D

2 HZN/TO 548 - Drazen Anicic; Pripremljeno: 2010-12-21
EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
1) Modifications in the entire document

Replace 14 times "center" with "centre".
Replace all occurrences of the symbol “Mc” with “Mo”.
Replace all occurrences of the symbol “Mc,Rd” with “Mo,Rd”.
Replace in the entire document "prEN 1090-2" with "EN 1090-2" and "prEN 1090-3" with "EN 1090-3".
2) Modification to 1.1.1
Paragraph “(3)”, delete footnote “5”.
Paragraph “(1)”, replace "(see section 3)." with "(see section 3 and Annex C).".
T
Delete footnote “6”.
M I
U N
EN
K D
Delete reference to “EN 1993-1-1”.
6) Modifications to 1.2.3
O A
Delete the following references:

R
EN 573-1 EN 12020-1 EN 439 ISO 18273

EN 573-2 EN 12020-2 EN 970 ISO 1000
EN 573-3 ISO 8062 EN 1011-1 ISO 31-0
EN 573-4 EN 287-2 EN 1418 ISO 3898
EN 515 EN288-4 EN-ISO 10042
“.
D
Delete the heading of Subclause “1.2.3.1”.
Replace heading numbers “1.2.3.2” to “1.2.3.4” with “1.2.3.1” to “1.2.3.3”.
Replace all dated reference numbers with undated reference numbers (e.g. replace "EN 485-1:1993" with
"EN 485-1"), except for “EN 755-2:1997” and “EN 1011-4:2000”, as well as for "EN 755-2:1997" which is
to be replaced with "EN 755-2:2008".
Replace "EN ISO 1302" with "prEN ISO 1302".
Move the following references to the Bibliography (undated): “EN 1592-1”, “EN 1592-2”, “EN 1592-3” and
“EN 1592-4”.
Title of “EN 12681”, replace "inspection" with "examination".

HZN/TO 548 - Drazen Anicic; Pripremljeno: 2010-12-21 3
EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
Replace title of “EN 1011-4” with "Welding – Recommendations for welding of metallic materials – Part 4:
Arc welding of aluminium and aluminium alloys.".
7) Modifications to 1.6
Section “6.2 Resistance of cross sections”, move the symbols “bo” and “Le” to Subclause “1.6” – section
“Annex K”.
Section “8 Design of connections”, delete the symbol “γMc” and its definition.
“Table 3.2b”, add two rows to the table with characteristics for “Alloy EN-AW 5454” and “EN-AW 5754”, as
shown below (some figures shall be bold as shown):
Thick- 4)
Alloy 1) 1) 5) 2) fo,haz 4) 4)
Product ness t f o f u A , fu,haz HAZ-factor
EN- Temper BC np
AW form mm 1) 6) 7)
3) N/mm2 % N/mm2 ρo,haz ρu,haz
T
5454 M I
ET, EP,ER/B O/H111 t ≤ 25 85 200 16 85 200 1 1 B 5
U N
F/H112
5754
EN
ET, EP,ER/B O/H111
F/H112
H14/
t ≤ 25 80 180 14 80 180 1 1 B 6
K D
DT H24/H34 t ≤ 10 180 240 4 100 180 0,56 0,75 B 16
“; and delete note 8.
O A
“Table 3.2b”, replace (some figures shall be bold as shown):
“
R
with:
“
D
“.
“Table 3.2b”, for “alloy 6063”, column 2, line 5, replace “.” with “,” to write:
“EP,ET,ER/B”.
“Table 3.2b”, footnote “3”, replace "EN 755-2" with "EN 755-2:2008".
“Table 3.2b”, in footnote “4”, second row, replace:

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
"(3xxx, 5xxx and 8011A)"
with:
"(3xxx and 5xxx)".
“Table 3.2b”, for “alloy 6082”, replace twice "EP/O,EP/H" with "EP".
9) Modification to 3.2.3.2
Paragraph “(1)”, in text and note, replace three times "EN 1706" with "EN 1706:1998"; and replace "see
6.3.3(2) EN …)" with "see 6.3.3.2 of EN …)"; and replace "see 6.3.3(3) EN …)" with "see 6.3.3.2 of EN
…)".
10) Modifications to 3.3.2.1

“Table 3.4”, footnote “1” of the table, delete “and (5)”.
“Table 3.4”, footnote “2” of the table, delete “and (4)”.
T
M I
Paragraph “(1)P”, note, replace "equal or less than the fundamental geometrical tolerances" with “in
U N
accordance with the essential tolerances”.
EN
Paragraph “(1)P”, note, replace “-valued” with “-values”.
K D
O A
Paragraph “(7)”, “Figure 5.3”, replace 4 times " e0,d " with " e0 ".
Paragraph “(11)”, equation “(5.6)”, replace:

R
N cr, m
ηinit ( x) = e0,d ηcr ( x)
′′
EI m ηcr
" max "
with:
N cr,m
η init ( x) = e0 η cr ( x)
EI m η cr,
′′ m
" ".
D
Paragraph “(11)”, formula “(5.7)”, replace " e0,d " with " e0 ".
Paragraph “(11)”, replace:
η cr
′′
"and m denotes the cross-section where reaches its maximum."
with:
η cr
′′
"and m denotes the cross-section where reaches its maximum in the case of uniform normal force
and uniform cross-section.".

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
′′
EI m ηcr
" max is the bending moment"
with:
′′ m
EI m η cr,
" is the bending moment".
1 1
′′
EI m η cr ′′ m
EI m η cr,
Paragraph “(11)”, “Note 2”, replace "The ratio max " with "The ratio ".
η II
max
MηIIcr, m η cr max
Paragraph “(11)”, “Note 2”, replace "may be replaced by " with "may be replaced by
η II
max
M ηIIcr,m η cr max
", i.e. replace "II" with "II".
Paragraph “(11)”, “Note 2”, replace:
T
" cr max is the maximum amplitude of…"
M I
U N
with:
η
" cr max EN
K D
is the maximum value of the amplitude of…".
Paragraph “(11)”, “Note 2”, replace:

O A
η II
“ max is the maximum deflection of the structure calculated using second order analysis for…"
R
with:
η II
" max is the maximum deflection of the structure calculated using second order analysis (symbolised by
II) for…".
Paragraph “(11)”, “Note 2”, equation “(5.8)”, replace:
e0,d N cr,m η II
M ηIIinit ( x ) = max
M ηIIcr (x )
M ηIIcr,m η cr
D
" max "
with:
e0 N cr, m η II
MηIIinit ( x ) = max
MηIIcr ( x )
MηIIcr, m ηcr max
" ".
e0 , d e0
Paragraph “(2)”, replace " " with " ".
e0 , d e0
Paragraph “(3)”, replace twice " " with " ".

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)

Paragraph “(3)”, entry “e)”, replace "6.1.4.3(1)a)" with "6.1.4.3(1)".

Paragraph “(2)”, replace "fa, haz" with "fu,haz".

"6xxx or 7xxx series alloys, or 5xxx series…"
with:
"6xxx and 7xxx series alloys, and in 3xxx and 5xxx series…".
"or work-hardened 5xxx series…"
T
with: M I
U N
EN
"and work-hardened 3xxx and 5xxx series…".
K D
"or work-hardened 5xxx series…"

O A
with:
R
"and work-hardened 3xxx and 5xxx series…";
and replace:
"and work-hardened 5xxx series…"
with:
"and work-hardened 3xxx and 5xxx series…".
Paragraph “(8)”, entry “a)”, replace:

D
"If the interpass temperature T1(°C), which should be somewhere between 60 °C and 120 °C, it is
conservative to assume that for 6xxx, 7xxx or workhardened 5xxx series alloys bhaz will be multiplied by a
factor α2, as follows:"
with:
"If the interpass temperature T1(°C) is between 60 °C and 120 °C, it is conservative for 6xxx, 7xxx and
work-hardened 3xxx and 5xxx alloys to multiply bhaz by a factor α2 as follows:".

Replace the last subclause number "(0)" with "(5)".
Paragraph “(2)”, delete “gross”.

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)

Move the last sentence of subclause “6.2.3” to the left (for alignment) and give it the number “(4)”.
Paragraph “(3)”, replace "see 6.3.1.5" with "see 8.5.2.3".
Paragraph “(1)”, add the following “Note”:
"Note Eccentricity due to the shift of centroidal axis of asymmetric welded sections may be neglected.".


T
M I
U N
EN
Paragraph “(2)”, last line, replace "β2/β3" with "β2/β".
K D
In clauses between “(5)” and “(8)”, replace "(2)" with "(6)"; then replace "(3)" with "(7)"; finally move clause
O A
“(6)” to the left (for alignment).
Paragraph “(6)”, replace "see 6.7.6." with "see 6.2.5.".

R
Paragraph “(8)”, replace "see 6.7.8." with "see 6.7.6.".

Paragraph “(2)”, replace “extend” with “extends”.
Paragraph “(2)”, in the explanation for “κ”, replace "according to 6.3.3.3." with "according to 6.3.3.3. κ = 1
D
if there are no welds.".
Paragraph “(1)”, in “(6.50)”, replace " χ < 1,0 " with " χ ≤ 1,0 ".

Replace paragraphs “(1)” and “(2)” with:
“(1) The relative slenderness λ is given by:

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
Aeff f o Lcr 1 Aeff f o

λ= =
N cr i π A E
(6.52)
where:
Lcr is the buckling length in the buckling plane considered
i is the radius of gyration about the relevant axis, determined using the properties of gross
cross-section.
(2) The buckling length Lcr should be taken as kL, where L is the length between points of lateral support;
for a cantilever, L is its length. The value of k, the buckling length factor for members, should be assessed
from knowledge of the end conditions. Unless more accurate analysis is carried out, Table 6.8 should be
used.
NOTE The buckling length factors k are increased compared to the theoretical value for fixed ends to allow for
various deformations in the connection between different structural parts.
Table 6.8 - Buckling length factor k for members
T
End conditions k
M I
1. Held in position and restrained in direction at both ends 0,7
U N
EN
2. Held in position at both ends and restrained in direction at one end
3. Held in position at both ends, but not restrained in direction
0,85
1,0
K D
4. Held in position at one end, and restrained in direction at both ends 1,25
5. Held in position and restrained in direction at one end, and partially 1,5
restrained in direction but not held in position at the other end
O A
6. Held in position and restrained in direction at one end, but not held 2,1
in position or restrained at the other end
R
".

Paragraph “(1)”, add note at the end of “(1)”:
"NOTE In a member with a local weld the slenderness parameter λ haz according to 6.3.3.3 (3)
should be used for the section with the weld".

D
Paragraph “(1)”, entry “d)”, replace “ingle” with “single”.

Paragraph “(1)”, replace “mayor” with “major”.

Paragraph “(1)”, replace "otherwise 6.3.3 and 6.3.3.4" with "otherwise 6.3.3, 6.3.3.4 and 6.3.3.5".

Paragraph “(2)”, replace clause “(2)” with:

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
M Ed,1 > M Ed,2 xs can be calculated from

“(2) For end moments only, the distance
xπ  ( M Ed,1 − M Ed,2 ) N Rd 1

cos s  = ⋅ ⋅
 lc  M Rd N Ed π(1 / χ − 1) xs ≥ 0
but (6.71)
A and B are examples of studied sections marked with transverse
T
lines. See Table 6.8 for value of buckling length l c = KL .
M I
Figure 6.14 - Buckling length l c and definition of xs ( = x A or x B ) ”.
U N
EN
32) Modification to 6.5.2 and 6.5.3
K D
Move “Figure 6.22” into Subclause “6.5.1”.
O A
Paragraph “(4)”, entry “b)”, replace twice "λ" with " λ ".
R

Paragraph “(2)”, last line, replace “Ma,Rd” with “Mu,Rd”.
Paragraph “(3)”, replace “Class 1 and 2 cross-section” with “Class 1 and 2 cross-sections”.
Paragraph “(3)”, last line of the clause, delete:
"fo is the characteristic value of strength for overall yielding".

D

Paragraph “(1)”, replace text of the clause with:
"(1) If the applied actions at the end of a rectangular plate result in a transverse stress gradient, the
stresses are transferred into an axial force and a bending moment treated separately according to 6.5.2
and 6.5.3. The load combination is then treated as in 6.5.6.”.
Paragraph “(2)”, in the 4th line, replace “may be satisfied” with “should be performed”.
Paragraph “(3)”, entry “a”, replace "ρu,haz" with "ρo,haz".

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
Paragraph “(3)”, entry “b”, replace:
430t 2 ε 2
ν1 = k τ
"where … b2 "
with:
430t 2 ε 2
ν1 = k τ
"where … b2 and ν1 ≤ 1,0".

Paragraph “(3)”, replace “conditions” with “condition”.
Paragraph “(3)”, replace "(6.90)" with "(6.90a)".
Paragraph “(4)”, replace clause “(4)” with:
VEd , then VEd may be ignored
T
"(4) If the combined action includes the effect of a coincident shear force,
M I
0,5VRd (see 6.5.8). If VEd > VRd the following condition should be satisfied:
U N
if it does not exceed
N Ed M  2V EN

2
K D
+ Ed +  Ed − 1 ≤ 1,00
N c, Rd M c, Rd  VRd  (6.90b).”.
O A

Paragraph “(4)”, replace “applied” with “longitudinal”.
R
Paragraph “(4)”, replace “transverse load” with “transverse in-plane direct stress”.

Paragraph “(2)”, delete "local buckling and".
Paragraph “(3)”, in the second line, replace "2aw" with "2a".
Paragraph “(5)”, replace "all stiffeners within the plate width b" with "all stiffeners and plating within the
D
width b".

Paragraph “(2)”, third line, replace "it may generally be assumed” with “it should generally be assumed”.
Paragraph “(4)”, replace three times “χc” with “χ”.

Paragraph “(2)”, delete “and the same general thickness t, found”.
"Bx = … area of stiffener"

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
with:
"Bx = … area of stiffeners", i.e. add "s".

Paragraph “(1)”, replace “(6.99) to (6.110)” with “(6.104) to (6.110)”.
Under “Table 6.13”, replace twice "faw" with "fuw".

Add number “(12)” in front of the last line.
In “(6.125)”, replace "VRd" with "Vw,Rd" (4).
Paragraph “(6)”, replace "of their actual value" with "of its value".
Paragraph “(7)”, replace "is the sum of the stiffness for the individual stiffeners" with "is the second
T
moment of area of all individual stiffeners".
M I
U N
EN
Paragraph “(2)”, in explanation of “Mf,Rd”, replace ", see 6.7.5(9)" with "(= min(Af1.hf fo/γM1, Af2.hf fo/γM1).".
K D
O A
Paragraph “(1)”, add explanation of “fof”:
"fof is the 0,2% proof strength of the flange material".

R
"- plastic moment of resistance utilized k = 0,55"
with:
"- elastic moment of resistance utilized k = 0,55".

D
Replace "(4)", "(5)" and "(6)" with "(3)", "(4)" and "(5)".
48) Modification to 7.1

Paragraph “(1)”, replace “A aluminium” with “An aluminium”.
Paragraph “(2)”, in explanation of “leff”, replace "see 6.7.5" with "see 6.2.5.2".

“Table 8.1”, replace “Table 8.1” with:

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
Table 8.1 - Recommended partial factors γM for joints
Resistance of members and cross-sections γM1 and γM2 see 6.1.3

Resistance of bolt connections
Resistance of rivet connections γM2 = 1,25
Resistance of plates in bearing
Resistance of pin connections γMp = 1,25
Resistance of welded connections γMw = 1,25
Slip resistance, see 8.5.9.3

- for serviceability limit states γMs,ser = 1,1
- for ultimate limit states γMs,ult = 1,25
Resistance of adhesive bonded connections γMa ≥ 3,0
Resistance of pins at serviceability limit state γMp,ser = 1,0
T
”.
M I
U N
EN
K D
Paragraph “(1)”, entry “(b)”, replace “each parts” with “each part”.
52) Modification to 8.3

O A
Replace paragraphs “(1)”, “(2)” and “(3)” with:
“(1) Where a joint loaded in shear is subject to frequent impact or significant vibration either welding,
R
preloaded bolts, injection bolts or other types of bolts, which effectively prevent movement and loosening
of fastener, should be used.
(2) Where slipping is not acceptable in a joint because it is subject to reversal of shear load (or for any
other reason), preloaded bolts in a slip-resistant connection (category B or C as appropriate, see 8.5.3),
fitted bolts or welding should be used.
(3) For wind and/or stability bracings, bolts in bearing type connections (category A in 8.5.3) may be
used.”.
D

Paragraph “(12)”, add new clause “(12)”:
“(12) Oversized holes in bolted connections of Category A may be used if the following conditions are met:
− a possible greater setting of the structure or of the component can be accepted;
− no reversal loads are acting;
− oversized bolts holes are used on one side of a joint, where they should be applied in the
component to be connected or in the connecting devices (cover plates, gussets);
− the rules for geometrical tolerances for oversized holes given in EN 1090-3 are applied;

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
− for bolts with diameter d ≤ 10 mm the design resistance of the bolt group based on bearing is less
than the design resistance of the bolt group based on shear. See also 8.5.5 (7).”.
“Table 8.2”, in rows 5 and 6, replace twice “8.5.1 (4)” with “8.5.1 (5)”.
“Table 8.2”, in footnote “2)”, replace "6.4 as" with "6.3 as"; delete "as column like buckling"; then delete
"The end distance is not affected by this requirement".

Paragraph “(1)”, replace "connected members" with "connected members under tension and compres-
sion".
Delete paragraph “(3)”.
Replace the title of “Figure 8.6” with “Connection of angles”.

Paragraphs “(2)”, “(3)” and “(4)”, delete the last sentence in each one of these paragraphs.
T
“Table 8.4”, in Row 5, for category C, replace the last condition for this category with:
M I
U N
ΣFv, Ed ≤ N net, Rd,ser
"

".
EN
K D
Paragraph “(6)”, replace the second sentence with:
O A
"For bolts with cut threads, the relevant values from Table 8.5 should be reduced by multiplying them by a
factor of 0,85.”.
R
Paragraph “(7)”, replace “(7)” with:
“(7) The values for design shear resistance Fv,Rd given in Table 8.5 apply only where the bolts are used in
holes with nominal clearances not exceeding those for standard holes as specified in EN 1090-3. For
oversized holes and slotted holes Fv,RD is reduced by a factor of 0,7.”.

D
Paragraph “(8)”, replace paragraph number "(8)" with "(6)".

Delete paragraphs “(7)” and “(8)”.

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)

Paragraph “(1)”, delete “or compression or bending”.

Title, replace "Scope" with "General".
Replace paragraphs “(1)” and “(2)” with the following ones:
“(1) Pin connections where rotation is required should be designed according to 8.5.14.2 – 8.5.14.3.
(2) Pin connections in which no rotation is required may be designed as single bolted connections,
provided that the length of the pin is less than 3 times the diameter of the pin, see 8.5.3. For all other
cases the method in 8.5.14.3 should be followed.”.

Replace paragraphs “(1)”, “(2)” and “(3)” with:
"(1) The geometry of plates in pin connections should be in accordance with the dimensional
T
requirements, see Figure 8.12.
M I
U N
EN F γ 2d
a ≥ Ed M1 + 0
K D c
F Ed 2tf o 3
d0
F γ d
c ≥ Ed M1 + 0
O A
2tf o 3
a
R
a) Given thickness and diameter of hole
1,6d0
FEdγ M1
t ≥ 0,7
fo
F Ed
FEdγ M1
2,5d0
0,75d0
d 0 ≥ 1,75
d0
fo
1,3d0 t = thickness of member (plate)
d0 = diameter of hole
D
0,3d0
b) Given geometry
Figure 8.12 - Geometrical requirements for pin ended members
(2)P At the ultimate limit state the design force FEd in the plate shall not exceed the design resistance
given in Table 8.7.
(3) Pin plates provided to increase the net area of a member or to increase the bearing resistance of a pin
should be of sufficient size to transfer the design force from the pin into the member and should be
arranged to avoid eccentricity.".

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)

Replace paragraphs "(1)" and "(2)" with the following paragraphs:
"(1) Pins should not be loaded in single shear, so one of the members to be joined should have a fork end,
or clevis. The pin retaining system, e.g. spring clip, should be designed to withstand a lateral load not less
than 10% of the total shear load of the pin.
(2) The bending moments in a pin should be calculated as indicated in Figure 8.13.
(3) At the ultimate limit state the design forces and moments in a pin should not exceed the relevant
design resistances given in Table 8.7.
(4) If the pin is intended to be replaceable (multiple assembling and disassembling of a structure), in
addition the provisions given in 8.5.14.2 and 8.5.14.3 the contact bearing stress should satisfy:
σh,Ed ≤ fh,Rd (8.28a)
where:
FEd,ser (d 0 − d ) 2 Ep Epl
σ h, Ed = 0,591 (8.28b)
T
d 2t Ep + Epl
M I
U N
EN
fh,Rd = 2,5 fo/γM6,ser
K D
where:
d is the diameter of the pin

O A
d0 is the diameter of the pin hole
FEd,ser is the design value of the force to be transferred in bearing under the characteristic load
R
combination for serviceability limit state
Ep, Epl is the elastic modulus of the pin and the plate material respectively.
D

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
Table 8.7 - Design resistances for pin connections
Criterion Resistance
Shear of the pin Fv,Rd = 0,6 A fup/γMp ≥ Fv,Ed
If the pin is intended to be replaceable this Fv,Rd, ser = 0,6 A fop/γM6,ser ≥ Fv,Ed,ser
requirement should also be satisfied
Bearing of the plate and the pin Fb,Rd = 1,5 t d fo,min/γM1 ≥ Fb,Ed
If the pin is intended to be replaceable this Fb,Rd = 0,6 t d fo/γM6,ser ≥ Fb,Ed,ser

Bending of the pin MRd = 1,5 Wel fop/γM1 ≥ MRd
If the pin is intended to be replaceable this MRd = 0,8 Wel fop/γM6,ser ≥ MEd,ser
Combined shear and bending of the pin (MEd/MRd)² + (Fv,Ed/Fv,Rd)² ≤ 1,0
d is the diameter of the pin
T
fo,min is the lower of the design strengths of the pin and the connected part
fup M I
is the ultimate tensile strength of the pin
U N
fop
t
EN
is the yield strength of the pin
is the thickness of the connected part
K D
A is the cross sectional area of a pin.
O A
0,5 F Ed 0,5 F Ed
e t1 e
R
d0
d
t2 t2
D
F Ed
Figure 8.13 - Actions and action effects on a pin

M Ed = FEd (2t 2 + 4e + t1 ) / 8
(8.28c)".

Paragraph "(2)", in first hyphen, delete "and for repair".

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)

Replace twice "6.5" with "6.1.6".

"Table 8.8", in footnote "2", replace "If filler metals 5056, 5356A, 5183 are used" with "If filler metals 5056,
5356A, 5556A/5556B, 5183/5183A are used".
66) Modifications to 8.6.3.2.3
fw 1 fw
Paragraph "(1)", Equation "(8.30)", replace "τ Ed≤ 0,6 " with "τ Ed≤ ".
γ Mw 3 γ Mw
Paragraph "(2)", delete the sentence “This applies specifically to the normal stress parallel to the axis of a
weld.”.

Replace paragraph "(4)" with:
T
M I
"(4) If the length of the weld is less than 8 times the throat thickness the resistance of the weld should not
U N
be taken into account. If the stress distribution along the length of the weld is not constant, see Figure
EN
8.16b, and the length of the weld exceeds 100 times the throat thickness the effective weld length of
longitudinal welds should be taken as:
K D
Lw,eff = (1,2 - 0,2 Lw/100 a) Lw with Lw ≥ 100 a (8.32)
where:
O A
Lw,eff = effective length of longitudinal fillet welds

R
Lw = total length longitudinal fillet welds
a = effective throat thickness, see Figure 8.17.
NOTE With non-uniform stress distributions and thin, long welds the deformation capacity at the ends may be
exhausted before the middle part of the weld yields; thus the connection fails by a kind of zipper-effect.
D
τ τ τ τ
a) Example of a uniform stress distribution b) Example of a non uniform stress distribution
Figure 8.16 - Stress Distributions in Joints with Fillet Welds".

σ Ed t 1 σ Ed t
Paragraph "(9)", Equation "(8.34)", replace "a ≥ 0,7 " with "a ≥ ".
f w / γ Mw 2 f w / γ Mw
τ Ed t 2 τ Ed t
Paragraph "(9)", Equation "(8.36)", replace "a ≥ 0,85 " with "a ≥ ".
f w / γ Mw 3 f w / γ Mw

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
Paragraph "(1)", list entry "a)", delete the definition of "t".
Paragraph "(1)", list entries "a)" and "b)", replace twice “material factor” with “partial safety factor”.
Paragraph "(1)", list entries "b)" and "c)", for equations "(8.41)" and "(8.43)", replace "at the toe" with "at
the fusion boundary and at the toe".
Paragraph "(1)", list entries "a)", "b)" and "c)", for equations "(8.38)", "(8.40)" and "(8.42)", replace “at the
toe of the weld (full cross section)” with “at the toe of the weld (full cross section) for full penetration welds
and effective throat section te for partial penetration welds”.
69) Modification to Annex A

Replace the whole "Annex A" with the following:
T
M I
U N
EN
K D
O A
R
D

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
"Annex A [informative] – Reliability differentiation

A.1 Introduction
(1) EN 1990 gives in its section 2 basic requirements to ensure that the structure achieves the required
reliability. Its Annex B introduces consequence classes and reliability classes and gives guidelines for the
choice of consequence class for the purpose of reliability differentiation. Consequence classes for
structural components are divided in three levels noted CCi (i = 1, 2 or 3)
(2) The consequence class and the associated reliability class for a structure or component have
implications for the requirements for the design and execution of the structure, and in particular to
requirements to design supervision and to inspection of execution.
(3) This annex is a guide for the application of the various parts of EN 1999 and for drafting the execution
specification required by EN 1090-3.
A.2 Design provisions for reliability differentiation - Design supervision

levels
(1) The guidance in EN 1990, Annex B for reliability differentiation provides:
T
M I
− rules for design supervision and checking of structural documentation, expressed by Design
U N
Supervision Levels;
EN
− rules for determination of design actions and combination of actions, expressed by the partial factors
for actions.
K D
NOTE The National Annex may give rules for the application of consequence classes and reliability classes and for the
connection between them and requirements for design supervision. Recommendations are given in EN 1990 Annex B.
O A
A.3 Execution provisions for reliability differentiation – Execution classes

(1) Execution classes are introduced in order to differentiate in requirements to structures and their
R
components for reliability management of the execution work, in accordance with EN 1990, clause 2.2
and its informative Annex B.
(2) Aluminium structures are classified in 4 execution classes denoted EXC1, 2, 3 and 4, where class 4
has the most stringent requirements.
NOTE EN 1990 recommends three consequence classes and three reliability classes. EN 1990 does, however, not include
structures subject to fatigue that is covered in EN 1999-1-3.
(3) The execution class may apply to the whole structure, to a part of a structure, to one or more
D
components or to specific details. A structure may include more than one execution class.
(4) It is a condition that the execution of structures and structural components is undertaken according to
EN 1090-3 following the rules for the various execution classes given in EN 1090-3.
A.4 Governing factors for choice of execution class

(1) The execution class should be selected based on the following three conditions:
a. the consequences of a structural failure, either human, economical or environmental;

b. the type of loading, i.e. whether the structure is subject to predominantly static loading or a
significant fatigue loading;

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
c. the technology and procedures to be used for the work connected with the requirements for the
quality level of the component.
(2) For considerations of the conditions under (a.) by use of consequence classes, see A.1.
(3) The type of uncertainty in exposure and actions (b.) and the complexity in work execution (c.)
represent hazards that can impose flaws in the structure leading to its malfunction during use. To consider
such hazards service categories and production categories are introduced, see Table A.1 and A.2.
Table A.1: Criteria for service category
Category Criterion
SC1 Structures subject to quasi static actions a)
Structures subject to repeated actions of such intensity that the inspection regime
SC2
specified for components subject to fatigue is required. b)
a)
Guidance is given in EN 1999-1-3 whether a component or structure may be regarded as subject
to quasi static actions and classified in category SC1.
b)
Service category SC2 should be used for cases not covered by SC1.
T
Table A.2: Criteria for production category
M I
U N
Category Criterion
EN
PC1 Non welded components
K D
PC2 Welded components
NOTE 1 The determination of the execution class for a structure/component should be taken jointly by the designer and the
O A
owner of the construction works, following national provisions in the place of use for the structure. EN 1090-3 requires that the
execution class is defined in the execution specification.
NOTE 2 EN 1090-3 gives rules for the execution of work including rules for inspection. The inspection includes in particular
R
rules for welded structures with requirements for quality level, allowable size and kind of weld defects, type and extent of
inspection, requirements to supervision and competence of welding supervisors and welding personnel, in relation to the
execution class.
Table A.3 gives recommendations for selection of execution class based on the above criteria. In case that
no execution class has been specified, it is recommended that execution class EXC2 applies.
A.5 Determination of execution class

(1) The recommended procedure for determination of the execution class is the following:
D
a) Determination of consequence class, expressed in terms of predictable consequences of a failure or

collapse of a component, see EN 1990;
b) determination of service category and production category, see Table A.1 and A.2;
c) determination of execution class from the results of the operations a) and b) in accordance with the
recommended matrix in Table A.3.

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
Table A.3 Determination of execution class
Consequence class CC1 CC2 CC3

Service category SC1 SC2 SC1 SC2 SC1 SC2
Production PC1 EXC1 EXC1 EXC2 EXC3 EXC3 a) EXC3 a)
category PC2 EXC1 EXC2 EXC2 EXC3 EXC3 a) EXC4
a)
EXC4 should be applied to special structures or structures with extreme consequences of a structural failure also
in the indicated categories as required by national provisions.
A.6 Utilization grades

(1) Utilization grades are used to determine requirements to the amount of inspection and to the
acceptance criteria for welds, see EN 1090-3.
(2) The utilization grade U for structures and components subject to predominantly static loading is
defined by
E γ
U= k F (A.1)
Rk / γ M
where:
T
Ek is the characteristic action effect;
M I
Rk is the characteristic resistance.
U N
EN
For combined actions U is given by the interaction formulae.
K D
(3) The utilization grade for structures and components subject to fatigue loads is defined in
EN 1999-1-3.".
O A
R
D

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
70) Modification to B.1

Paragraph "(6)", "Table B.1", add the following "NOTE" to the table:
"NOTE See figures 8.1 to 8.4.".
71) Modification to C.3.3

Paragraph "(1)", replace "EN AC-44100" with "EN AC-44200".
72) Modification to C.3.4.2

Paragraph "(2)", list entry "c)", replace "prEN 12681" with "EN 12681".
73) Modifications to D.3.2

Paragraph "(1)", replace "EN 508-2:1996" with "EN 508-2".
Paragraph "(5)", "Table 1", "NOTE", replace "EN 508-2:1996" with "EN 508-2".
T
M I
74) Modification to D.3.3
U N
EN
Paragraph "(1)", replace "EN 508-2:1996" with "EN 508-2".
K D
75) Modification to D.3.4.5
"Table D.2", "Note 3", replace "EN 508-2:1996" with "EN 508-2".
O A
76) Modification to D.3.4.7

R
"Table D.2", replace:
"Legend:
Treatments applied to the contact areas of structural members"
with:
"Legend:
M = metal, B = bolt, R = rivet,
Treatments applied to the contact areas of structural members".

D
77) Modification to H.10

Replace "H.5" with "H.4".
78) Modifications to E.2.1.1
Paragraph "(1)", in equation "(E.1)", replace "0 < ε ≤ εp" with "0 ≤ ε ≤ εp".
Paragraph "(3)", replace:
" εu = nominal value of ultimate strain (see Section 3)"
with:

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
" εu = nominal value of ultimate strain (see E.3)".
"fmax = nominal value of fu (see Section 3)"
with:
"fmax = nominal value of fu (see Figure E.1a and Section 3) or fp (see Figure E.1b)".
Paragraph "(1)", in equation "(E.3)", replace "0 < ε ≤ εp" with "0 ≤ ε ≤ εp".
" f p = limit of proportionality (= Rp0,001)"
with:
" f p = conventional elastic limit of proportionality (see E.2.1.2(3))".
T
M I
U N
EN
"fe = limit of elasticity (= Rp0,2)"
K D
with:
O A
" fe = conventional limit of elasticity (see E.2.1.2(3))".
End of the Subclause, add the following paragraph:

R
"(3) In the absence of more accurate evaluation of the above parameters the following values may be
assumed for both models of Figures E.2a) and E.2b):
f p = f 0,01
f e = nominal value of f o (see Section 3)
f max = nominal value of f u (see Figure E.2a and Section 3) or f e (See Figure E.2b)
ε u = nominal value of ultimate strain (see E.3)

D
ε max = 0,5ε u
ε p = f 0,01 / E
( )(
E1 = f e − f p / ε e − ε p )
E 2 = ( f max − f e ) / (ε max − ε e ) in Figure E.2a)".
Paragraph "(2)", in the line before equation "(E.6)", replace "0 < ε ≤ εp" with "0 ≤ ε ≤ εp".
Paragraph "(2)", for "Region 2", delete " with ε p = 0,5ε e and ε e = f e /E ".

EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
"fe = conventional elastic limit"
with:
"fe = conventional limit of elasticity".
" εu = nominal value of ultimate strain (see Section 3)"
with:
" εu = nominal value of ultimate strain (see E.3)".

Replace formula numbers "(E.10)" to "(E.19)" with numbers "(E.9)" to "(E.18)".
T
M I
U N
with:
"fe
EN
= conventional elastic limit"
K D
"fe = conventional limit of elasticity".
O A
Paragraph "(3)", replace "As conventional elastic limit" with "As conventional limit of elasticity".
ln(0,002 / ε o,max ) ln(0,002 / ε o,max )

R
Paragraph "(4)", Equation "(E.14)", replace " n = " with " n = ".
ln( f o / f max ln( f o / f max )
ln 2 ln 2
Paragraph "(4)", Equation "(E.13)", replace " n = " with " n = ".
ln f o / f 0,1 ln ( f o / f 0,1)
"(5) Based on extensive tests, the following values may be assumed:"

D
with:
"(5) Based on extensive tests, the following values may be assumed instead of the ones given in
E.2.2.2(4):".
82) Modification to E.3

Replace formula numbers "(E.20)" to "(E.21)" with "(E.19)" to "(E.20)".
83) Modifications to F.2


EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1:2009 (E)
84) Modification to I.1.2

"Figure I.1", in the figure, replace three times "C" with "G" thus:
" ".
85) Modifications to I.3

Paragraph "(1)", replace "under standard conditions of restraint (see I.1.1(2)) at each end" with "under
various conditions at its ends".
T
M I
U N
Paragraph "(1)", under equation "(I.16)", replace "It , Iw , Iz , kv ," with "It , Iw , Iz , ky ,".
86) Modification to M.3.3

EN
K D
Paragraph "(1)", replace “material factor” with “partial safety factor”.
O A
R
D


En 1999-1-1 2007 - A1 2009 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

En 1999-1-1 2007 - A1 2009 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

En 1999-1-1 2007 - A1 2009 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

EUROPEAN STANDARD EN 1999-1-1:2007/A1

ICS 91.010.30; 91.080.10

Eurocode 9: Design of aluminium structures - Part 1-1: General

Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom.

EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION

Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels

Radni dokumenti za HZN/TO 548

1) Modifications in the entire document

Replace all occurrences of the symbol “Mc” with “Mo”.

Replace all occurrences of the symbol “Mc,Rd” with “Mo,Rd”.

Delete the following references:

EN 573-1 EN 12020-1 EN 439 ISO 18273

Delete the heading of Subclause “1.2.3.1”.

Replace heading numbers “1.2.3.2” to “1.2.3.4” with “1.2.3.1” to “1.2.3.3”.

Replace "EN ISO 1302" with "prEN ISO 1302".

Title of “EN 12681”, replace "inspection" with "examination".

Radni dokumenti za HZN/TO 548

“Table 3.2b”, replace (some figures shall be bold as shown):

“Table 3.2b”, in footnote “4”, second row, replace:

Radni dokumenti za HZN/TO 548

"(3xxx, 5xxx and 8011A)"

"(3xxx and 5xxx)".

10) Modifications to 3.3.2.1

“Table 3.4”, footnote “2” of the table, delete “and (4)”.

11) Modifications to 5.3.1

Paragraph “(11)”, equation “(5.6)”, replace:

Paragraph “(11)”, replace:

Paragraph “(11)”, replace:

Radni dokumenti za HZN/TO 548

Paragraph “(11)”, “Note 2”, replace:

Paragraph “(11)”, “Note 2”, replace:

Paragraph “(11)”, “Note 2”, equation “(5.8)”, replace:

" max "

13) Modifications to 5.3.4

Radni dokumenti za HZN/TO 548

14) Modification to 6.1.4.3

15) Modification to 6.1.6.2

16) Modifications to 6.1.6.3

"6xxx or 7xxx series alloys, or 5xxx series…"

Paragraph “(6)”, replace:

"or work-hardened 5xxx series…"

"or work-hardened 5xxx series…"

"and work-hardened 3xxx and 5xxx series…";

"and work-hardened 5xxx series…"

"and work-hardened 3xxx and 5xxx series…".

Paragraph “(8)”, entry “a)”, replace:

17) Modifications to 6.2.2.2

Paragraph “(2)”, delete “gross”.

Radni dokumenti za HZN/TO 548

18) Modifications to 6.2.3

Paragraph “(3)”, replace "see 6.3.1.5" with "see 8.5.2.3".

Paragraph “(1)”, add the following “Note”:

19) Modification to 6.2.4

20) Modification to 6.2.5

“(6)” to the left (for alignment).

Paragraph “(6)”, replace "see 6.7.6." with "see 6.2.5.".

Paragraph “(8)”, replace "see 6.7.8." with "see 6.7.6.".

23) Modification to 6.2.9.3

24) Modification to 6.3.1.1