B Công Anh TQ
B Công Anh TQ
B Công Anh TQ
Kirschner J. & Štěpánek J. (2011): Dandelions in Central Asia: a revision of Taraxacum section
Stenoloba. – Preslia 83: 491–512.
On the basis of rich material from Asia, a recently described group of dandelions, Taraxacum sect.
Stenoloba Kirschner et Štěpánek, is revised taxonomically. Four previously described species are
recognized: T. sinomongolicum, newly typified, T. mongoliforme, with a lectotype replacing the
original holotype now not extant, and a new epitype, T. scariosum, a new combination of Leontodon
scariosus Tausch, replacing the frequently confused names, T. asiaticum, newly typified, and T. steno-
lobum, and T. multisectum, a taxon for the first time compared with other members of the section.
Three new species are described: T. abax occupies a large range from S Siberia and Mongolia to NE
China, T. abalienatum and T. odibile are known from Mongolia and SE Siberia. Taraxacum abax
and T. abalienatum represent core species of the section Stenoloba, whilst T. odibile exhibits a mix-
ture of characters of sections Stenoloba and Leucantha. All the known members of the section
Stenoloba are agamosperms. Taraxacum mongoliforme, T. abax and T. scariosum proved to be
triploid with 2n = 24. This account includes detailed descriptions and an identification key.
Introduction
Principles for studying Taraxacum taxonomy were outlined by Richards (1973),
Kirschner et al. (2003) and Kirschner & Štěpánek (1996a). They reflect the peculiar fea-
tures and processes known in dandelions: coexistence of agamospermy and sexuality,
complex hybridity and polyploidy, low level of structural morphological differentiation
and the high number of mutually similar and mostly hybridogenous species. The complex-
ity of the genus also requires another taxonomic rank, placed between species and genus in
the traditional hierarchy, to make the population and taxonomic structure more easily
understandable for non-specialists. The rank of section is usually used in the majority of
Taraxacum literature. The recognition and application of the above principles and taxo-
nomic tools is needed to describe the dandelion diversity in regional floras. However, there
are large territories where the basic exploration has not been completed and where the
above principles remain to be observed, one of the most important being North-Central
Asia, a region covering S Siberia, Mongolia, the former Soviet Middle Asia and N and W
China, a region with an enormous diversity of this genus. A rich material collected by the
authors and their collaborators in Siberia, the Altai, Mongolia, Middle Asia, Ladakh, Tibet
and China, later also cultivated in the Czech Republic, was used to summarize the diversity
of dandelions (Taraxacum, Compositae–Lactuceae) in the region of North-Central Asia,
492 Preslia 83: 491–512, 2011
and resulted in five publications (Kirschner & Štěpánek 1996b, 2004, 2005, 2008,
Kirschner et al. 2006) in which four new sections and 13 new species were described. The
present paper is the fifth in the series dealing with the dandelions of steppe and subsaline
habitats of that territory. The important older literature that needs to be consulted is cited in
the historical introduction of the paper by Kirschner et al. (2006).
Taxonomic treatment
Taraxacum sect. Stenoloba Kirschner et Štěpánek, Folia Geobot. 39: 261 (2004)
Type: Taraxacum stenolobum Stchegl.
1. Taraxacum sinomongolicum Kitagawa, Neo-Lineam. Fl. Manshur. 687 (1979), nom. nov.
S y n.:
≡ Taraxacum cuspidatum Dahlst. in H. Smith, Acta Horti Gotob. 2: 171 (1926), nom. illeg. (Art. 53.1), non
Marklund, Acta Soc. Fauna Fl. Fenn. 34(7): 19 (1911). – Type: [China, Hebei, Xiao Wutai Shan] Chili: Hsiao-
wu-tai-shan, Yang-kia-ping [Yang-hia-p’ing], Hsi-lin, 1900–2000 m, 1 Oct 1921, H. Smith 349 (lectotype,
designated here: UPS, no. det. 11825).
0.8–1.5 (–2.0) cm, ± subglabrous, ± pinnatisect; lateral lobes (3) 4–6 pairs, 3–8 × 3–4 mm,
linear-triangular to narrowly triangular, recurved to ± patent, usually entire; interlobes 2–3
(–4) mm wide, entire; terminal lobe sometimes elongated, narrowly triangular, sagittate at
base, acute, entire. Scapes greenish, sparsely arachnoid, more densely below capitulum.
Capitulum ca 2 cm in diameter. Involucre 7–8(–9) mm wide, base ± rounded; outer bracts
20–24, deep green to pale green, with a distinct whitish-membranous border 0.2–0.3 mm,
± imbricate, lanceolate to narrowly lanceolate, the outermost ones sometimes linear,
4.0–5.5 (–7.5) × ca 1–1.5 mm, ca 2/5–1/2 as long as inner ones, loosely appressed, later
some or all may be patent-arcuate, margin glabrous to sparsely ciliate, flat; inner bracts
1–1.2 cm long, ± corniculate. Flowers ± yellow, outer ligules flat, striped greyish green
outside. Stigmas pale greenish. Anthers polliniferous; pollen grains irregular in size.
Achenes pale greyish, 3.9–4.2 × 0.9–1.0 mm, body apically ± densely spinulose, spinules
short, erect-patent, body gradually narrowing into ± cylindric cone 0.9–1.0 mm long; beak
5–6 mm long, thin; pappus 5–6 mm long, slightly yellowish white. Fl. summer.
Agamosperm (Fig. 1H).
Notes on the original material and the selection of the lectotype: Seven original
syntypes are cited by Dahlstedt (1926), if the two duplicate specimens of J. G. Andersson
407a (S, no. det. 9239, 18379) are included, and these represent the original material to be
considered in the typification procedure. Dahlstedt (1926) also published illustrations of
morphological details of this taxon, and his choice of specimens as models for the pictures
was important in the selection of the lectotype. The original syntypes are briefly described
below (Dahlstedt’s mistakes in spelling are corrected).
Fig. 1. – Details of achenes of all the taxa included in sect. Stenoloba: A – T. scariosum, no. det. 15729; B –
T. scariosum, no. det. 22716; C – T. abalienatum, no. det. 22715; D – T. abax, no. det. 22713; E – T. mongoliforme,
no. det. 22717; F – T. odibile, no. det. 22712; G – T. multisectum, no. det. 15863; H – T. sinomongolicum, no. det.
18656. Scale bar = 1 mm.
496 Preslia 83: 491–512, 2011
drawing the figures. The lower plant was used as a model for figures 10a, b (Dahlstedt 1926: 172), a young
head of it is depicted on Plate III, fig. 5, and the achene description in the protologue matches achenes of this
syntype. These facts qualify the specimen to be the best candidate for the lectotype of the name T. cuspidatum
Dahlstedt, and in the absence of a better choice it is so designated. The plants were collected in autumn, and
have leaves without characteristic features of taxa known in the region. Outer bracts, seemingly well devel-
oped, have a typical appearance of those of a number of taxa of this section in autumn: they are narrow, with-
out corniculation or callose. However, a comparison of the type material with plants in PE makes it possible to
characterize this rather rare species.
For the time being, the taxonomic conception of the interpretation of the name
T. sinomongolicum used here is based on two conspecific syntype specimens (collected
rather late in the season in Inner Mongolia), another specimen from Inner Mongolia
(PRA) and a collection from Hebei in herbarium PE. Further study is therefore needed as
many characters observed or measured on this late material may be rather uncertain; there
is rich material in cultivation from autumn 2010, collected by the authors at Wutaishan,
Shanxi, for that purpose.
S p e c i m e n s s t u d i e d: China: Hebei, Zhongbei County, near Deng You Fang, 14 Aug 1959, [anonymous]
6067 (PE, no. det. 18656). – Nei Mongol (Inner Mongolia), Xilinhot (Abangar Banner) Xian: Qian Long
Dianyutai, near lake Dalai Nur, 1350 m, 7 Aug 1993, D. E. Boufford, E. W. Wood, T. S. Ying & H. Y. Zhang, no.
25939 (PRA, no. det 24454).
The original type of T. mongoliforme was not found. It is reported to be deposited in a pri-
vate herbarium; no response was received by us, or by our German colleagues from the
owner of the material (K. Kloss). As all the attempts to locate the holotype failed, it is con-
sidered to be non extant. The identity of the original type of the taxon described under the
name T. mongoliforme with our material is highly probable because both the figure in Doll
(1975, Plate XXIIIb) and the description match the features of our numerous collections.
The only difference is the small size of achenes reported for T. mongoliforme in the
protologue, a feature that may be attributed to the imperfect development of young fruits
of the original material. The above figure (Doll 1975, Plate XXIIIb) is the only extant ele-
ment of the original material of the name T. mongoliforme. It is therefore inevitable that it
is selected as the lectotype of this name.
In order to stabilize the nomenclature of the group, an epitype is designated from well
developed material preserved in an internationally recognized institutional herbarium
(PRA), with duplicate material in other herbaria.
D e s c r i p t i o n: Plants medium-sized. Petiole narrow, unwinged, often narrowly winged
in outer leaves, deep purple, mid-rib purple; leaf blade broadly linear in outline, usually
6–9 (–11) × 1 (–1.4) cm, sparsely arachnoid, mid–green, divided into numerous (usually
Kirschner & Štěpánek: Taraxacum section Stenoloba in Central Asia 497
4–7) pairs of lateral lobes, lobes usually patent to slightly forward-pointing, less often ±
recurved, short, narrowly triangular, 2–4 mm wide near the base, (2–) 4–5 mm long, acute,
sometimes leaves undivided, coarsely dentate; interlobes 2–8 mm long, usually 3–6 mm
wide, entire or with scattered teeth (or distal base of lobes sparsely toothed or entire).
Scapes arachnoid, young ones densely so. Capitulum up to 3.5 cm in diameter. Involucre
rounded at the base, 8–10 mm in diameter, inner bracts usually 12–14 mm long, deep
green, darker reddish near the apex, distinctly corniculate; outer bracts loosely appressed
to ± erect, later arcuate, ± numerous, 12–17, slightly imbricate or not so, sparsely ciliate,
green, almost always suffused purple, ovate to lanceolate, usually 6.5–7.5 × 2–3 mm, bor-
ders either paler or reddish, (0.1–) 0.3–0.4 mm wide, bracts distinctly horned (horns thick,
0.7–1.5 mm long). Flowers yellow, outer ligules flat, long, striped grey greenish pink out-
side, ligule teeth faintly reddish or dirty yellow. Stigmas green, pollen present, irregular in
size. Achenes greyish, 4.2–4.6 mm long, 0.9 mm wide, gradually narrowing into a thin,
subcylindrical cone 1.0–1.2 (–1.3) mm long, achene body shortly spinulose to squamulose
above, otherwise ± smooth to slightly tuberculate. Rostrum thin, usually (7.5–) 8–9 mm
long, pappus white, ca 6.5–7 mm long. 2n = 24 (counted by J. Kirschner under no. 6/93,
from Lake Baikal, JŠ 1575/36, see above). Agamosperm (Fig. 1E, 2).
Probably a widely distributed species known from south-central and eastern Siberia
and from Mongolia. According to our field observations, this species most often occurs on
dry, steppe and secondary steppe slopes.
S p e c i m e n s s t u d i e d: Mongolia: Suche-Bator, pagus Shamar, in alluvionibus fl. Orchon, 7 Jul 1987,
V. Petrovskiy s. n., planta culta sub no. JŠ 3141 et JK 194 (PRA, no. det. 15722; numerous multiplicates in
Taraxaca Exs., no. 747). – Russia: Transbaicalia, Nerczinsk in pratis subsalsis prope stationem viae ferreae
Kuyenga, 24 Jul 1910, V. Sukaczew & G. Poplavskaya 1451 (WU, no. det. 9594, one of the original syntypes of
T. cuspidatum, see above). – Sibiria centralis, oppidum Irkutsk, lacus Baikal, in declivibus stepposis supra pagum
Listvyanka, 26. Oct 1985, J. Štěpánek & J. Kirschner, cultivated from JŠ 1575/35 and as JK 223 (PRA, no. det.
15723); as JŠ 2716 (PRA, no. det. 15724); as JŠ 2534 (PRA, no. det. 15725); as JŠ 2717 (PRA, no. det. 15726,
distributed as Taraxaca Exs., no. 748–750).
Fig. 3. – Taraxacum scariosum (Tausch) Kirschner et Štěpánek. A, the holotype plants; B, holotype labels (PRC).
500 Preslia 83: 491–512, 2011
= Taraxacum commixtiforme Soest in P. Hanelt et S. Davažamc, Feddes Repert. 70: 61 (1965). – Type: Mongo-
lia, Südgobi-Aimak, Dund-Sajchan, Bognin-chjar, ca 25 km südl. Bulgan, Trockental, Meereshöhe ca 1500 m
[further data on a hand-written original label: N-Kette des Gebirges, nahe einer Wasserlaufs], 28 May 1962,
Mongolisch-Deutsche Expedition 2085 (holotype: GAT, no. det. 11812; isotypes: GAT, no. det. 11813; L, no.
det. 9317).
E x s i c c a t e: Taraxaca Exs., no. 284.
1
Dahlstedt’s mistakes in spelling are corrected
Kirschner & Štěpánek: Taraxacum section Stenoloba in Central Asia 501
a. “Guv. Tomsk, Kreis Biisk, Kansk, Salzwiesen beim See”, W. L. Nekrassova (WU, no. det. 9600). A poorly
developed plant that could not be identified to species. Taraxacum scariosum possible.
b. “Altai”, Gebler 10, “ex herb. Horti Petropol.” (WU, no. det. 9603). A plant belonging to the section Leucantha
(a syntype of T. dealbatum, at the same time).
c. “Altai”, Ledebour 458 (reported to be deposited at W). No relevant plant with Dahlstedt’s identification label
found at W.
d. “Baikal: Listvics?” [most probably Listvyanka village], O. Lönnbohm (S, no. det. 9236). A fragment that does
not allow any identification.
e. “Irkutsk” (S. J. Enander, 9. Jul 1913, S, no. det. 9233, 9237). Plants collected as summer forms. Comparison
with our collections shows that they may be close to the Taraxacum sinicum group, section Leucantha. The
plants are not eligible as a lectotype as their characters do not correspond to the protologue. Another plant
annotated by Dahlstedt but not listed among syntypes should be mentioned here: 6 Jul 1913, S. J. Enander
(S, no. det. 9238).
f. “In ripa fluminis Selenga prope stationem viae ferreae Divisionnaja”, 15 Jul 1913, S. J. Enander (S, no. det.
9234). Late summer plants, probably very close to T. odibile (see below). Designated as the lectotype in an
ineffective way by C. F. Lundevall (in scheda) but not eligible because the fruits differ from the original
description.
g. “Mongolia: 7 li septentrionem versus a Tobo-ol, Burte-nor” (4. Aug 1919, J. G. Andersson 407a, S, no. det.
9239, 11815). These two specimens are rather confusing because Dahlstedt (1926) quotes the localities of
both his T. asiaticum and T. cuspidatum, but neither of the specimens is annotated by him. Thus, the syntype
status of the two specimens is doubtful. The no. det. 9239, probably a syntype of T. cuspidatum (for discus-
sion, see above), represents T. scariosum. We failed to identify the other plant; it resembles an autumn form of
T. sinicum. The third plant collected, J. G. Andersson 407a, S, no. det. 18379, is conspecific with T. sino-
mongolicum and discussed above.
h. “Tibetia: Kuen-lun, oasis Su-tschou, 3700' ”, V. I. Roborowski (WU, no. det. 9599). In all likelihood, a young
plant of T. scariosum.
i. [Sichuan] “Tibetia: Batang”, G. N. Potanin 27 p.p. [mistakenly given as 257 by Dahlstedt] (WU, no. det. 9598).
A well developed T. scariosum.
j. “Chili, Hsiao-wu-tai-shan, ad ripam torrentis supra Tien-lin-ssü”, H. Smith 427 (UPS, no. det. 11814). A late
September collection. The only young leaf preserved, the achene and flower characters allow a safe identifi-
cation of the plant as T. scariosum. This plant was used for drawings (Dahlstedt 1926) and corresponds very
well to the original description. It is selected as the lectotype of T. asiaticum in the present paper.
k. “Kansu”, Przewalski (WU). A plant of low quality located in WU but without Dahlstedt’s identification label.
Not taken into consideration in the lectotypification procedure.
a possible combination in Taraxacum, has priority over the epithet stenolobum (1829 ver-
sus 1854).
S e l e c t e d s p e c i m e n s s t u d i e d: Kazakhstan: Semipalatinskiy uyezd, K. K. Kosinskiy 417 (LE, no. det.
7958). – Semipalatinskaya oblast’, Karkal. u., Dzharla, 26 Jun 1890, S. Korzhinskiy (LE, no. det. 7943). –
Semipalatinskiy uyezd, Sulu-Cheku, po beregu r. Sarchalovka, 1914, K. K.. Kosinskiy (LE, no. det. 7941). –
Semipalatinskiy uyezd, Chingiz, 25 May 1914, Schipczinsky 325 (LE, no. det. 7938). – Semipalatinskiy uyezd,
gory Chingiz, raion r. Namal’, 28 May 1914, K. K. Kosinskiy 482 (LE, no. det. 7939). – Russia: Altai, distr.
Ongudai, in valle fl. Katun non procul a confl. cum fl. Bol’shoi Yaloman, 30 Jun 1988, J. Kirschner, cultivated as
JK 3347 (PRA, no. det. 15729). – Altai, okr. Teletzkogo oz. [vicinity of Lake Teletzkoe Ozero] bliz s. Kamyrtuk,
dolina Chulyshmana, 2 Jun 1909, Sychinskiy (LE, no. det. 8203). – Baikal, zapadnoe poberezh’e mezhdu 53°
i 55° s. sh., Onguren, 8 Jul 1928, K. A. Rassadina (LE, no. det. 7950). – Irkustkaya guberniya, na pr. beregy r.
Ushakovki, 24 Jun 1874, collector illegible (LE, no. det. 7940). – Irkutskiy uyezd, Ordvynskaya inorodnaya
uprava, 10 Jun 1902, Sorokin (LE, no. det. 7960, p.p.). – Transbaicalia, mezhdu Nerchei i Kuengoi [between
rivers Nercha and Kuenga], Sukhoi Baigul’, na stepi Kochevnogo Khrebta, 17 Jun 1911, V. Sukaczew &
G. Poplavskaya, no. 743 (LE). – Mongolia: Ulan-Bator, in alluvionibus rivi ad pontem trans fl. Tola, 25 Jul 1987,
V. Petrovkiy, cultivated from JŠ 3147 as JK 195 (PRA, no. det. 9932, also distributed as Taraxaca Exsiccata, no
284, e.g. H, S, L, K). – China: [Shanxi] Young Mong Shan, Shansi N, 29 Jul 1914, Licent 1064 (BM, no. det.
8438). – [Heilongjiang] Mandschurei, gegend von Harbin, Auwiese, feuchter Lehmboden, 26 May 1926, Jettmar
(W, no. det. 8983). – Tibet, Kuen-lun, oasis Su-tschou, 3700', V. I. Roborowski (WU, no. det. 9599). – [W
Sichuan] Tibet, Batang, G. N. Potanin 27 p.p. (WU, no. det. 9598).
4. Taraxacum multisectum Kitagawa, Rep. Inst. Sci. Res. Manchoukuo 2(7): 310 (1938)
T y p e: [China, Jilin Province, Changchun] Prov. Chi-lin: Circa Hsin-ching, 25 May 1938, M. Kitagawa
(lectotype, designated here: TI, no. det. 15863; isotype: TI, no. det. 18713).
S p e c i m e n s s t u d i e d: China, [Jilin Province, Changchun] Prov. Chi-lin: Circa Hsin-ching, 24 May 1938,
M. Kitagawa (TI, no. det. 18714, 18715).
Fig. 5. – Taraxacum abax Kirschner et Štěpánek. Holotype (PRA, no. det. 22713).
506 Preslia 83: 491–512, 2011
A species characterized primarily by its erect, comparatively broad outer bracts, dark
stigmas and achenes with a body not so gradually narrowing into a cone as in the other
members of this section. In its outer bracts, it is similar to T. multisectum but differs in fruit
morphology (see Fig. 1), which makes it possible to distinguish the two taxa. It is a widely
distributed taxon, its range extending from the Siberian Altai to Transbaicalia in the north
and from Xinjiang through Mongolia to Hebei in the south.
S p e c i m e n s s t u d i e d: Russia: Altai, distr. Ongudai, secundum viam publicam ca 15 km situ occid. a pago
Iodro, 1 Jul 1988, J. Kirschner, cultivated as 3351 (PRA, no. det. 15738; JK 85, PRA, no. det. 15740). –
Zabaikalskaya oblasť, Chitinskiy trakt, Otokhay [?], 26 Jun 1913, G. Poplavskaya, M. Poplavskiy & E. Ditmer,
no. 1124 (LE, no. det. 18207). – Zabaikalskaya oblasť, bassein r. Barguzina. ... [illegible], 19 Jun 1911, A. Zhukova,
no. 64 (LE, no. det. 18208). – Baikal, 17 Jun 1915, V. Sukaczew & G. Poplavskaya, no. 816 (LE, no. det. 18210). –
Baikal, Kultuk, 5 Jun 1915, G. Poplavskaya & Yu. Tsenserling, no. 5 (LE, no. det. 18212); 6 Jun 1915,
G. Poplavskaya & Yu. Tsenserling, no. 39 (LE, no. det. 18211); 12 Jun 1915, V. Sukaczew & G. Poplavskaya, no.
415 (LE, no. det. 18213). – Irkutsk, lacus Baikal, Listvyanka, pascuis ad ripam lacus Baikal, prope ostium amnis
Angara, 26 Oct 1985, J. Kirschner & J. Štěpánek, cultivated from 1574/36 as JŠ 2710 (PRA, no. det. 15727). –
Irkutsk, lacus Baikal, Listvyanka, in decl. stepposi supra portum in pago Listvyanka, 26 Oct 1985, J. Kirschner &
J. Štěpánek, cultivated as JŠ 2533 (PRA, no. det. 25200). – Mongolia: Suche-Bator, pagus Shamar, in
alluvionibus fl. Orchon, 21 Jul 1987, V. Petrovskiy, cultivated as JŠ 3144 (PRA, no. det. 15739). – Ulan-Bator, in
collibus siccis ad pedem montis Bogd-úl, Aug 1990, J. Soják, cultivated as JK 734 (PRA, no. det. 15741; JK 714,
PRA, no. det. 25196; JK 719, PRA, no. det. 25195; JK 731, PRA, no. det. 15742; JK 733, PRA, no. det. 15743; JK
737, PRA, no. det. 25197; JK 741, PRA, no. det. 25198; JK 742, PRA, no. det. 25199). – Mongolia, along the
main road ca 30 km ESE of Ulan-Bator, 47°50'N, 107°09'E, ca 1570 m, 16 Sep 2006, J. Kirschner & I. Staňa, cul-
tivated as JK 5070 (PRA, no. det. 25194; JK 5069, PRA, no. det. 25193; JK 5071, PRA, no. det. 25192). – Mongolia,
Ulan-Bator, at the foot of the Bogd-ul Mts, Tuul River, grasslands, S of the river, 47°53'N, 106°55'E, ca 1300 m,
10 Sep 2006, J. Kirschner & I. Staňa, cultivated as JK 5061 (PRA, no. det. 25191). – Mongolia, ca 40 km E of
Ulan-Bator, near the bridge S of Terelj National Park, 47°49'N, 107°20'E, ca 1550 m, 16 Sep 2006, J. Kirschner &
I. Staňa, cultivated as JK 5067 (PRA, no. det. 25190). – China: Hebei, Niang Niang Wa Gou, Ying Liu 15309
(PE, no. det. 18613, 18612). – China, prope limitem provinciarum Hebei et Beijing: situ boreo-orientali ab oppido
Miyun, ad radicem borealem montis Wuling Shan, 700 m s. m., 40°40'N, 117°27'E, 1 Aug 1995, R. Businský, cul-
tivated as JŠ 5863 (PRA, no. det. 24455). – Xinjiang, the Tian Shan, above Glacial Station II, mountain steppe
pastures at 2000 m, 43°06'00"N 87°00'59"E, 4 Oct 2003, P. Sekerka 3/8 (PRA).
lingulate lateral lobes 5–12 × 1.5–2.5 mm; outer leaves usually have shorter and denser
lobes, inner ones have long, broader and more remote lobes; interlobes narrow and usually
short, (2–) 4–7 mm long, usually up to 2 mm wide, proximal edge of lobe base and
interlobes often with acute lobules and/or dentate; terminal lobe ± lingulate, usually ca
1 cm long and ca 3 mm wide, with small lobules at the base. Scapes densely arachnoid to
arachnoid. Capitulum 2–3 cm in diameter. Involucre ± rounded at the base, usually up to
10 mm in diameter; outer bracts regularly arcuate, 18–23, glaucous dull green, distinctly
corniculate to cornute, usually suffused reddish near the apex, ± not imbricate, ± linear
lanceolate, 6.5–9.0 × (1.6–) 1.8–2.3 mm, borders whitish membranaceous, ± distinct,
0.2–0.3 mm wide; inner bracts deep green to slightly glaucous green, distinctly
corniculate, 10–13 mm long, usually up to 2 mm wide. Flowers yellow, outer ligules ± flat,
striped grey pinkish (or greenish) outside, inner ligule teeth reddish. Stigmas yellow to
greyish yellow, with sparse darker hairs (overall appearance of stigmas: dirty yellow to
greyish). Pollen present, irregular in size. Achenes grey to grey straw-brown, 3.7–4.0 mm
long, 0.8–0.9 mm wide, ± subabruptly narrowing in a 0.9–1.0 mm long, thin, ± cylindrical
cone, often with 1–2 spinules at the cone base, achene body ± densely spinulose above,
otherwise smooth, spinules short, broad-based, rostrum thin, 7–8 mm long, pappus white,
6–7 mm long. Agamosperm. (Fig. 1C, 6).
Taraxacum abalienatum is characterized by numerous, regularly arcuate outer bracts
with subapical horns. The closest species, T. abax, has fewer, broader, straight, loosely
appressed to erect outer bracts. Known from a series of steppe hills in the Bogd-úl group
near Ulan Bator, Mongolia and from Transbaicalia.
S p e c i m e n s s t u d i e d: Mongolia centr.-boreal., urbs Ulan-Bator, in collibus siccis ad pedem montis Bogd-
úl, Aug 1990, J. Soják, cultivated as JK 721 (PRA, no. det. 15734; JK 736B, PRA, no. det. 15735; JK 715, no. det.
15736; JK 729, PRA, no. det. 15720). – Russia, Transbaicalia, mezhdu Nerchei i Kuengoi, okr. s. Nov. Olova, 13
Jul 1911, V. Sukaczew & G. Poplavskaya, no. 1095 (LE).
usually up to 2 cm long and 2–4 mm wide. Scapes arachnoid (densely so below the
capitulum), later sparsely arachnoid. Capitulum ca 2 cm in diameter. Involucre rounded to
slightly subconical at the base, 7–8 mm in diameter; outer bracts loosely appressed, ± gla-
brous (very sparsely ciliate near the apex), slightly imbricate, cornute to corniculate,
16–20, lanceolate to broadly lanceolate, 5.5–7.0 × 1.7–2.4 mm, mid-green to deep green,
± glaucous, darker and suffused pinkish at the apex, with indistinct whitish-greenish bor-
ders ca 0.3–0.4 mm wide; inner bracts mid-green, darker and suffused pinkish at the apex,
corniculate, usually 12–14 × 1–2 mm. Flowers numerous, yellow, outer ligules flat, striped
dark grey with pinkish tinge, inner ligules ± flat, apical teeth pinkish-reddish. Pollen pres-
ent, irregular, stigmas greyish, dark hairy. Achenes greyish straw-brown, 3.8–4.0 mm
long, ca 0.8 mm wide, gradually narrowing into a ± thin cylindrical cone 0.9–1.1 mm long,
achene body ± densely spinulose, spinules thin, acute, erect, straight, rostrum ca 6–7 mm
long, pappus white, ca 6 mm long. Agamosperm. (Fig. 1F, 7).
Taraxacum odibile is known from the vicinity of Ulan-Bator, Mongolia, where it occurs
on steppe or substeppe slopes. The other specimens less safely belonging to this species
come from southern Siberia and another region of Mongolia (see list of specimens below).
Its position in the sect. Stenoloba is based on the thin, sparsely spinulose achene body with
thin erect spinules, gradually narrowing into a thin long cone, and the deeply dissected
leaves with linear lobes. Outer bracts of T. odibile are slightly imbricate, usually appressed,
and in some specimens have an appearance similar to that of T. sinicum (more greenish,
tightly appressed, subimbricate). The latter, however, has substantially different achenes.
S p e c i m e n s s t u d i e d: Mongolia centr.-boreal., urbs Ulan-Bator, in collibus siccis ad pedem montis Bogd-
úl, Aug. 1990, J. Soják, cultivated as JK 720 (PRA, no. det. 15730; JK 739, PRA, no. det. 15731; JK 738, PRA,
no. det. 15732; JK 716, PRA, no. det. 15733). – Less safe identifications: Russia, Siberia: “Divisionnaja”, J. S.
Enander (S, no. det. 9234). – Mongolia: Töv-Aimak, Chutzutu-gol [R. Doll (1975, plate 24b, under the name
T. cuspidatum)].
Nomina excludenda
Taraxacum yinshanicum Z. Xu et H. C. Fu in Y.-C. Ma, Fl. Intramongol. 6: 330 (1982).
H o l o t y p e: [China, Inner Mongolia] Daqinshan, Baichazigou, 16 Jul 1973, Ma Yu-chuan 103 (NMU, photo
vidimus).
There is a discrepancy between the figure of T. yinshanicum (Plate 113, figs. 1, 2 in Y.-C.
Ma, op. cit.) and the type specimen. While the picture shows a plant with characters that do
not exclude sect. Stenoloba, the type specimen undoubtedly is a rather late collected mem-
ber of the sect. Ruderalia.
The name Taraxacum heterolepis Nakai et Koidzumi ex Kitagawa, Bot. Mag., Tokyo,
47: 829 (1933), is based on the holotype specimen (TI) that lacks important characters and
cannot be safely classified, not even to this section. It is accepted in Ge et al. (1999) as
a correct name for T. multisectum (see below) but differs from the latter in the shape and
posture of the outer phyllaries and in important achene features.
Type material of the name T. falcilobum Kitagawa, also referred to this group by Ge et
al. (1999), was not traced and the protologue does not give relevant information on its tax-
Kirschner & Štěpánek: Taraxacum section Stenoloba in Central Asia 511
onomic position. The description does not point to the sect. Stenoloba and its sectional
position is uncertain; further study is needed.
Acknowledgements
The study was funded by the following grants: National Grant Agency grant no. GA206/07/1555, Ministry of
Education grant (Czech-Chinese Collaboration Scheme KONTAKT), no. ME10143, and the Research Plan
Grant of the Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences, no. AV0Z 60050516. We are grateful to the collectors
listed in the text who provided plant material and/or achenes. Thanks are due to the curators of the following her-
baria: TI, KYO, G, GAT, K, BM, LE, PE, PRC, S, UPS, LD, W, WU etc., for loans of herbarium material and/or
help and assistance during studies at their institutions. The authors are grateful for valuable remarks of reviewers.
Souhrn
Na základě studia rozsáhlého materiálu z Centrální Asie, zejména z jižní Sibiře, včetně Altaje a Zabajkalí, Mon-
golska a severní až severovýchodní Číny, byla taxonomicky revidována nedávno popsaná sekce Taraxacum sect.
Stenoloba Kirschner et Štěpánek. Kromě herbářů leží těžiště materiálu v kultivovaných rostlinách z vlastních ex-
pedic a ze vzorků dalších cestovatelů. Pozornost byla věnována přesné interpretaci a náležité typifikaci použitých
jmen. Pro nejrozšířenější druh sekce bylo nalezeno jméno Leontodon scariosus Tausch, nově kombinováno do
rodu Taraxacum, aby nahradilo značně různorodě a nepřesně interpretovaná jména T. stenolobum a zvl. T. asia-
ticum (pro které byl vybrán lektotyp). Typifikováno bylo i jméno T. sinomongolicum Kitagawa a omezeno tak na
rostliny ze severovýchodní Číny. Rozšířený mongolsko-jihosibiřský druh T. mongoliforme Doll byl nově inter-
pretován; typ jména měl být uložen v soukromém herbáři, nyní s neznámou lokalizací a tedy zcela nedostupný.
Proto je pro jméno vybrán lektotyp (fotografie holotypu) a tento interpretován epitypem. Druh T. multisectum Ki-
tagawa byl poprvé srovnán s ostatními příslušníky sekce a náležitě charakterizován; je nejspíš omezen svým vý-
skytem na severovýchodní Čínu. Nově jsou popsány tři agamospermní druhy: Taraxacum abax, široce rozšířený
od Altaje po Zabajkalí a na jih přes Mongolsko až do severní Číny; je blízký druhu T. multisectum, ale liší se pod-
statně svými plody (Fig. 1). Taraxacum abalienatum je známé z hojného materiálu z pahorků Bogd-úl u Ulan-Ba-
toru v Mongolsku a z jednoho vzorku ze Zabajkalí; je to druh s nápadně rohatými a obloukem zahnutými vnějšími
zákrovními listeny. Poslední popsaný druh, T. odibile, je svými listy a plody charakteristickým členem sekce Ste-
noloba, avšak svými zákrovy se poněkud blíží skupině T. sinicum ze sekce Leucantha.
References
Dahlstedt H. (1926): Plantae sinenses a Dre. H. Smith annis 1921–22 lectae. XIV. Die Gattung Taraxacum. –
Meddel. Göteb. Bot. Trädgård. 2: 143–184.
Doll R. (1975): Zur Taraxacum-Flora der Mongolischen Volksrepublik. – Feddes Repert. 86: 511–519.
Ge X.-J., Ling Y. & Zhai D. (1999): Taraxacum. – In: Ling Y. & Ge X.-J. (eds), Flora Reipublicae popularis
sinicae, Vol. 80 (2) Angiospermae, Dicotyledoneae, Compositae (11), Cichorieae, p. 1–94, Science Press,
Beijing.
Kirschner J. (1988): A preliminary report on the plants collected by F. W. Schmidt. – Preslia 60: 85–88.
Kirschner J. (2009): Typification of Zaluzianskya villosa F. W. Schmidt (Scrophulariaceae–Manuleae). – S. Afr.
J. Bot. 75: 588–590.
Kirschner J. & Štěpánek J. (1992): Notes on the series of Taraxaca Exsiccata, Fasc. I–IV. – Preslia 64: 17–33.
Kirschner J. & Štěpánek J. (1993): The genus Taraxacum in the Caucasus. 1, Introduction. 2, The section
Porphyrantha. – Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 28: 295–320.
Kirschner J. & Štěpánek J. (1996a): Modes of speciation and evolution of sections in Taraxacum. – Folia Geobot.
Phytotax. 31: 415–426.
Kirschner J. & Štěpánek J. (1996b): Interpretation of some older Taraxacum names from Asia. – Edinb. J. Bot.
53: 215–221.
Kirschner J. & Štěpánek J. (1997a): A nomenclatural checklist of supraspecific names in Taraxacum. – Taxon 46:
87–98.
Kirschner J. & Štěpánek J. (1997b): Notes on the series of Taraxaca Exsiccata, Fasc. I–IV. – Preslia 69: 35–38.
Kirschner J. & Štěpánek J. (2004): New sections in Taraxacum. – Folia Geobot. 39: 259–274.
Kirschner J. & Štěpánek J. (2005): Dandelions in Central Asia: Taraxacum sect. Suavia. – Preslia 77: 263–276.
512 Preslia 83: 491–512, 2011
Kirschner J. & Štěpánek J. (2008): The most common dandelions in Middle Asia: the problem of Taraxacum sect.
Macrocornuta, T. sect. Ceratoidea sect. nova, and the identity of T. halophilum. – Phyton 48: 61–78.
Kirschner J., Štěpánek J. & Klimeš L. (2006): Dandelions in Central Asia: a taxonomic revision of Taraxacum
section Leucantha. – Preslia 78: 27–65.
Kirschner J., Štěpánek J., Mes T. H. M., Nijs J. C. M. den, Oosterveld P., Štorchová H. & Kuperus P. (2003): Prin-
cipal features of the cpDNA evolution in Taraxacum (Asteraceae, Lactuceae): a conflict with taxonomy. – Pl.
Syst. Evol. 239: 231–255.
Nijs J. C. M. den, Kirschner J., Štěpánek J. & Van der Hulst A. (1990): Distribution of diploid sexual plants of
Taraxacum sect. Ruderalia in east-central Europe, with special reference to Czechoslovakia. – Pl. Syst. Evol.
170: 71–84.
Orazova A. O. (1975): Oduvančiki Kazachstana i Srednei Azii (Rod. Taraxacum Wigg.) [Dandelions of
Kazakhstan and Middle Asia]. – Nauka, Alma-Ata.
Richards A. J. (1973): The origin of Taraxacum agamospecies. – Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 66: 189–211.
Schischkin B. K. [& Tzvelev N. N., ed.] (1964): Rod 1667. Oduvančik – Taraxacum Wigg. – In: Komarov V. L.
(ed.), Flora SSSR 29: 405–560, 728–754, Moskva & Leningrad.
Tausch J. F. (1829): Descriptiones plantarum minus cognitarum. – Flora, 12/1, p. 33–51, Ergänzungsbl.,
Regensburg,
Tzvelev N. N. (1987): Rod Taraxacum Wigg. (Asteraceae) v Central’noj Azii [Taraxacum in Central Asia]. –
Nov. Sist. Vyssh. Rast. 24: 205–222.
Vajnberg T. I. (1991): Rod 977 (127). Oduvančik, Kokuch, Koku (tadzh.) – Taraxacum Wigg. – In: Flora
Tadzhikskoi SSR 10: 353–413, 462–469, Nauka, Leningrad.