Design and Analysis of Electro Hydraulic Thruster Brake For Lifting Machine
Design and Analysis of Electro Hydraulic Thruster Brake For Lifting Machine
Design and Analysis of Electro Hydraulic Thruster Brake For Lifting Machine
ABSTRACT
Brakes are very important part of most important part of the crane. Failure of brakes is often
associated with the sudden and massive failure. In the recent era disc brakes for a crane has
become very important. And incorporating disc often asks greater efficiency and exact position
stop when we apply disc brake. The power of disc brake is very higher than of conventional
drum brakes. If the liner wear and tear is less and if auto adjustment is provided to disc brakes, it
gives an advantage of less maintenance as well greater safety to machine and operator.
INTRODUCTION
Electro-hydraulic thruster brakes actuation always offers very smooth brake operation, without
giving any jerks or vibration. Production of electric voltage transient on spring return produces
stress on electrical components of DC solenoid actuator system. This has many advantages e.g.
high maintenance and power reliability issues as compared to electro-hydraulic thruster disc
brake. In recent this has become more popular technique, as this is viable, safe and economic to
use. Thruster brake is a device type, retardation of speed of moving object and slowly stopping to
accurate position is also possible at desired position. In this case brake is applied by pressing a
brake shoe which is pre-stressed by usage of compressing spring. The brake shoe is designed in
such a way that it applies pressure on rotating drum and slow deceleration occurs and at one
point, it will finally come to halt.
1|Page
NOVATEUR PUBLICATIONS
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIONS IN ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY [IJIERT]
ISSN: 2394-3696
VOLUME 2, ISSUE 12, DEC.-2015
SALIENT FEATURES:
• This is a spring loaded normally ON Failsafe Brake
• Works on 415 V AC, 3 Phase, 50 Hz supply.
• Readily available oil to be filled in thruster cylinder.
• Function is to bring to stop, moving / rotating machinery like motor / gearbox.
• Holds / stops the load in desired place.
• Prevents jerk
• Maintenance free, robust design.
• Torque Spring and Liner riveted to Brake Shoes
• Consists of Electro mechanical Thruster
APPLICATIONS:
• All Material Handling and Lifting Equipment’s
• Hoisting
• Conveyors
• Elevators.
Existing system: The conventional thrust brakes employ either an electro mechanical thruster or
passive hydraulic thruster. The electromechanical thruster utilizes an electro-mechanical solenoid
to apply the braking force whereas the hydraulic thruster brake applies the force via a thruster
that is operated by hydraulic force. The value of the hydraulic force is fixed irrespective of the
load that the system carries hence this lead to under braking force or over braking force leading
to slip of load i.e., improper load positioning or over braking leading to excessive and un-
necessary brake wear.
2|Page
NOVATEUR PUBLICATIONS
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIONS IN ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY [IJIERT]
ISSN: 2394-3696
VOLUME 2, ISSUE 12, DEC.-2015
The active electro - hydraulic thruster will have a construction as shown in fig.3., here the motor
used is a 12 volt dc motor with voltage based speed control mechanism in built , made suitably
to vary the force for three operating conditions. The pump system is proposed to be piston pump
type depending upon the force requirements of the system. The braking spring functions merely
to bring the hydraulic piston back to original position once the braking load is released. Pressure
lug connects the hydraulic thruster to the brake application lever of the brake caliper whereas the
mounting end is used to mount the hydraulic thruster onto the frame.
3|Page
NOVATEUR PUBLICATIONS
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIONS IN ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY [IJIERT]
ISSN: 2394-3696
VOLUME 2, ISSUE 12, DEC.-2015
1. Maximum stress by theoretical method and Von-mises stress are well below the
allowable limit; hence the input shaft is safe.
2. Input shaft shows negligible deformation under the action of system of forces.
1. Maximum stress by theoretical method and Von-mises stress are well below the
allowable limit; hence the DRUM shaft is safe.
2. DRUM shaft shows negligible deformation under the action of system of forces
4|Page
NOVATEUR PUBLICATIONS
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIONS IN ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY [IJIERT]
ISSN: 2394-3696
VOLUME 2, ISSUE 12, DEC.-2015
1. Maximum stress by theoretical method and Von-mises stress are well below the
allowable limit, hence the DRUM is safe.
2. DRUM shows negligible deformation under the action of system of forces
Observation table: Table No.6. Gives reading of brake load vs braking distance reading and
graph. Taking standard load on dyno brake pulley = 1.5kg
2 0.4 121
3 0.6 104
4 0.8 87
5 1 74
6 1.2 61
7 1.4 48
8 1.6 28
9 1.8 11
The graph indicates that the braking distance reduces with increase in brake load , ie the reaction
time of the brake drops with increase in bra
brake load.
6|Page
NOVATEUR PUBLICATIONS
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIONS IN ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY [IJIERT]
ISSN: 2394-3696
VOLUME 2, ISSUE 12, DEC.-2015
CONCLUSION
1. It is observed that the theoretical output speed reduces with the increase in brake force as
the power is absorbed in friction.
2. It is observed that the experimental output speed reduces with the increase in brake force
as the power is absorbed in friction.
3. It is observed that both the theoretical as well as experimental output speed decreases
with the increase in brake load , slight variation is seen in both loads indicating marginal
slip in brake
4. It is observed that the %slip increases with the increase in brake load but is limited to
below 4%
5. It is observed that the braking distance reduces with increase in brake load , i.e. the
reaction time of the brake drops with increase in brake load.
REFERENCES
[1] Mr. Peter M Darley and Mr. Jimmy Liang, Crane Modernization, presented at TOCASIA,
1998.
[2] Dr. Eng. Romer, Difference between dynamic and static coefficient of friction, Container
handling.
[6] James M. Apple, ‘Material Handling System Design’, John-Wiley and Sons
[7] Spivakovsy, A.O. and Dyachkov, V.K., ‘Conveying Machines’, Volumes I and II, MIR
Publishers,
[9] Kulwiac R. A., ‘Material Handling Hand Book’, John Wiley Publication
[11] Andrew K. Costain and J Michael Robichaud, Practical Methods for Vibration Control of
Industrial Equipment, Bretech Engineering, NB Canada,2003, pp-1-8.
[12] D. Taylor, “Fluid dampers for applications of seismic energy dissipation and seismic
isolation” Elsevier science ltd. ISBN-0080428223, Nov-1995.
7|Page