Unit I Synchronous Reluctance Motors
Unit I Synchronous Reluctance Motors
Fig 1.1 Idealized Three Phase Four Pole Synchronous Machine (Salient Pole)
The rotor of the modern reluctance machine is designed with iron laminations in the
axial direction separated by non-magnetic material. The performance of the reluctance
motor may approach that of induction machine. With high saliency ratio a power
factor oh 0.8 can be reached. The efficiency of a reluctance machine may be higher
than an induction motor, because there is no rotor copper loss. Because of inherent
simplicity, robustness of construction and low cost.
The synchronous reluctance motor has no synchronous starting torque and runs up
from stand still by induction action. There is an auxiliary starting winding. This has
increased the pull out torque, the power factor and the efficiency. Synchronous
reluctance motor is designed for high power applications. It can broadly be classified
into Axially laminated and Radially laminated.
Reluctance motors can deliver very high power density at low cost, making them
ideal for many applications. Disadvantages are high torque ripple (the difference
between maximum and minimum torque during one revolution) when operated at low
speed, and noise caused by torque ripple. Until the early twenty-first century their use
was limited by the complexity of designing and controlling them. These challenges are
being overcome by advances in the theory, by the use of sophisticated computer
design tools, and by the use of low-cost embedded systems for control, typically based
on microcontrollers using control algorithms and real-time computing to tailor drive
waveforms according to rotor position and current or voltage feedback. Before the
development of large-scale integrated circuits the control electronics would have been
prohibitively costly.
Dual-rotor layouts provide more torque at lower price per volume or per mass.
[The inductance of each phase winding in the motor will vary with position, because
the reluctance also varies with position. This presents a control systems challenge.
Applications
Some washing machine designs.
Control rod drive mechanisms of nuclear reactors.
Salient rotor design is as shown. The low Ld. /Lq ratios are largely the result of
Circulating flux in the pole faces of the rotor. However the ruggedness and simplicity
of the rotor structure has encouraged for high speed applications.
stator tooth pitch regardless of the angle of rotation of the rotor. This is done to
maximize flux variations and hence iron losses in the rotor. Special rotor laminations
make it possible to produce the same number of reluctance path as there are magnetic
poles in the stator. Synchronous speed is achieved as the poles lock in step with
magnetic poles of the rotating stator field and cause the stator to run at the same speed
as the rotating fields. The rotor is pressures with end rings similar to induction
motor.Stator winding are similar to squirrel cage induction motor.
The rotor joining technique known as explosion bonding. Explosion bonding uses
explosive energy to force two or more metal sheets together at high pressures.
Conventionally the high pressure causes several atomic layers on the surface of each
sheet to behave as a fluid. The angle of collision between the two metals forces this
fluid to jet outward. Effectively cleaning the metal surface, these ultra clean surfaces
along with the high pressure forcing the metal plates together provide the necessary
condition for solid phase welding. Experimental tests on a stainless steel/mild steel
bond indicate that the tensile and fatigue strengths of the bond are greater than those of
either of the component materials due to the shock hardening which occurs during the
process. The bond was also subjected to 10 cycles of temperature variation from 20° C
- 70°C, with no significant reduction in tensile strength.
Reluctance motors have approximately one third the HP rating they would have as
Induction motors with cylindrical rotors. Although the ratio may be increased to 9one
half by proper design of the field windings, power factor and efficiency are poorer
than for the equivalent induction motor. Reluctance motors are subject to cogging,
since the locked rotor torque varies with the rotor position, but the effect may be
minimized by skewing the rotor bars and by not having the number of poles.
V = E – j IsdXsd – j Isq…………(1.1)
Where
Xsd and Xsq are the synchronous reactance of direct and quadrature axis
Isd and Isq are the direct and Quadrature axis current
I = Isd + Isq…………….(1.2)
V = E – j IsdXsd – j IsqXsq
Where
Advantages
There is no concern with demagnetization; hence synchronous reluctance
machines are inherently more reliable than PM machines.
There need not be any exciting field as torque is zero, thus eliminating
electromagnetic spinning losses.
Synchronous reluctance machine rotors can be constructed entirely from high
strength, low cost materials.
Disadvantages
High cost than induction Motor.
Need Speed synchronization to inverter output frequency by using rotor position
sensor and sensor less control.
Compared to induction motor it is slightly heavier and has low power factor.
By increasing the saliency ratio Lds/Lqs, the power factor can be improved.