Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Arbitrage Pricing Theory
The arbitrage pricing theory was developed by the economist Stephen Ross in 1976, as an
alternative to the capital asset pricing model (CAPM). Unlike the CAPM, which assume
markets are perfectly efficient, APT assumes markets sometimes misprice securities, before
the market eventually corrects and securities move back to fair value. Using APT,
arbitrageurs hope to take advantage of any deviations from fair market value. However, this
is not a risk-free operation in the classic sense of arbitrage, because investors are assuming
that the model is correct and making directional trades – rather than locking in risk-free
profits.
While APT is more flexible than the CAPM, it is more complex. The CAPM only takes into
account one factor — market risk — while the APT formula has multiple factors. And it
takes a considerable amount of research to determine how sensitive a security is to various
macroeconomic risks. Which factors, and how many of them are used, are subjective choices
– which means investors will have varying results depending on their choice. However, four
or five factors will usually explain most of a security's return. (For more on the differences
between the CAPM and APT, read CAPM vs. Arbitrage Pricing Theory: How They Differ)
APT factors are the systematic risk that cannot be reduced by the diversification of an
investment portfolio. The macroeconomic factors that have proven most reliable as price
predictors include unexpected changes in inflation, gross national product (GNP), corporate
bond spreads and shifts in the yield curve. Other commonly used factors are gross domestic
product (GDP), commodities prices, market indices and exchange rates.
Where:
rf – Risk-free rate
The beta coefficients in the APT model are estimated by using linear regression. In general,
historical securities returns are regressed on the factor to estimate its beta.
For example, the following four factors have been identified as explaining a stock's return,
and its sensitivity to each factor and the risk premium associated with each factor have been
calculated:
Gross domestic product growth: ß = 0.6, RP = 4%
Expected return = 3% + (0.6 x 4%) + (0.8 x 2%) + (-0.7 x 5%) + (1.3 x 9%) = 15.2%
The advantages and disadvantages of the arbitrage pricing theory are designed to look at the
long-term average of returns. There are a handful of systematic influences which can affect
this long-term average. By looking at the asset and the risks involved, a prediction of an
anticipated return becomes possible. It is a good option for individual securities. When a
portfolio of diverse securities is examined, however, APT may not be a suitable tool to use.