Development of New Hydroforming Methods
Development of New Hydroforming Methods
Abstract
Hydroforming has applied for many kinds of auto parts in Japan since 1999. In
order to expand hydroforming market, increasing of hydroforming limit and joining
technology between hydroforming component and other component are important.
Therefore authors developed following five new hydroforming technologies, (1) high
branch forming technology with moving dies, (2) forming technology of two branches
with right angle each other, (3) large expanding technology by means of expanding
method with restricted expanding direction and crossing moving dies and counter
punches each other, (4) hydro-burring and nut-inlaying technology and (5) full length
flange forming technology.
* Chief Researcher, Dr.Eng., Forming Technologies Research Lab., Steel Research Laboratories
20-1 Shintomi, Futtsu, Chiba 293-8511
- 39 -
NIPPON STEEL TECHNICAL REPORT No. 103 MAY 2013
- 40 -
NIPPON STEEL TECHNICAL REPORT No. 103 MAY 2013
Fig. 4 FEM results of strain states after forming branch by hydroforming 13)
bulging work under axial feeding, buckling occurs and pure shear
deformation is prevented from taking place, and the uniaxial tension
in the circumferential direction would be best achievable.16) Restric-
tion by dies is effective at preventing buckling, and it is desirable
that the material to be in contact with the dies from the beginning.
Fig. 5 Forming of two branches in right angles to each other 15) Therefore, it follows that pure shear deformation is likely to result
from restricting a material tube in one direction by dies and allow-
ing it to expand in another at right angles.17)
between the branches marked with “a”. The smaller the ratio K/WL According to this understanding, the authors worked out the fol-
or the smaller the stagger, the more the strain at the portion “a” lowing method. First, sectional expansion in the vertical direction is
changes from pure shear to uniaxial tension in the circumferential applied while restricting horizontal deformation; then, horizontal
direction and the larger the absolute value of the strain becomes. expansion is applied while restricting vertical deformation. This en-
When K/WL = 100% or the branches are completely staggered, on ables large sectional expansion finally in all directions. Fig. 7 18)
the other hand, the strain at the critical portion is substantially the shows an example formed by the developed method; here, the cir-
same as that at other positions. This indicates that it is possible to cumference of a JIS STKM11A steel tube with an outer diameter of
form two branches from one tube by hydroforming and minimize 60.5 mm and wall thickness of 2.5 mm was stretched to approxi-
the strain at the critical portion by adequately selecting the amount mately three times the initial size. The rate of expansion (%), which
of stagger of the branches. In other words, it is difficult to form two is defined by convention as [circumference after forming – initial
branches from the same position of a material tube at right angles to circumference] / [initial circumference] × 100, of this example is
each other, but this becomes viable when the positions of the 200%. In consideration of the fact that the expansion rate of parts
branches are adequately staggered. formed by hydroforming is mostly approximately 10%, and at the
2.3 Cross-movable dies for sectional expansion in limited largest 40%,7) the expansion rate that the developed method achieves
directions is revolutionarily large.
As stated in Subsection 2.1, pure shear deformation is desirable Furthermore, in the above multi-step forming method, the au-
for large deformation, but when a steel tube is subjected to free thors developed cross-movable dies as a new forming technology.
Fig. 6 FEM results of strain states after forming two branches in right angles to each other 15)
- 41 -
NIPPON STEEL TECHNICAL REPORT No. 103 MAY 2013
- 42 -
NIPPON STEEL TECHNICAL REPORT No. 103 MAY 2013
portion of a steel tube with an outer diameter of 63.5 mm, wall cannot be obtained because of high strength. For such cases, a tech-
thickness of 2.3 mm, and tensile strength of 460 MPa was hydro- nique to inlay a threaded nut in a hydro-formed part was developed.
formed into a rectangular section at a rate of expansion of 50%, a Fig. 13 22) schematically illustrates the process. The method is basi-
hole was made using a piercing punch with a diameter of 10 mm, cally the same as the hydro-burring process shown in Fig. 10 except
and then hydro-burring was done using a burring punch with a d di- that a threaded nut is used instead of the burring punch and the nut
ameter of 20 mm. The part shown in Fig. 12 20) was obtained by ap- is left inlayed in the formed part. Fig. 14.22) shows an example of
plying M22 tapping to the hole of the part shown in Fig. 11. The nut inlaying in a part similar to that shown in Fig. 11; the material
tapped thread enables joining of the hydro-formed part to another tube is a little thinner here with an outer diameter of 63.5 mm, wall
piece with a bolt. thickness of 2.0 mm, and tensile strength of 440 MPa. This method
However, the above method cannot be easily applied when the makes it possible to join a formed piece of a thinner wall thickness
wall thickness of the material tube is too small for tapping or the to another with a bolt. Nuts of various shapes were tested, and in
hole expandability of the tube is poor and a sufficient burring height consideration of characteristics such as sealing with the base materi-
al, the resistance to falling in or out after inlaying, drawing load at
bolt tightening, and tightening torque, the nut shape shown in Fig.
15 22) was selected as the most suitable.
- 43 -
NIPPON STEEL TECHNICAL REPORT No. 103 MAY 2013
Fig. 15 Detailed sizes of the best nut for inlaying into hydroformed
components (dimensions in mm) 22)
- 44 -
NIPPON STEEL TECHNICAL REPORT No. 103 MAY 2013
ing limits and facilitating joining of formed pieces to others, the au-
thors developed the following forming methods.
1) The height of branching was extended to 2.2 times the diame-
ter of material tube because of developed movable dies to fa-
cilitate the influx of material to the branch.
2) Forming of two branches extending at right angles to each oth-
er was possible by staggering their positions in the axial direc-
tion.
3) The rate of expansion was increased by restricting the direction
of expansion in a forming step, repeating such steps, and
changing the direction of expansion. Forming of axle housings,
the circumference of the center portion of which is expanded
approximately three times that of the material tube, was possi-
ble by the use of a set of dies consisting of movable dies and
counter punches moving in directions perpendicular to each
other.
4) A method of hydro-burring was developed, wherein a hole
Fig. 18 Hydroforming samples with full length flange 24)
made by hydro-piercing was expanded while the internal pres-
sure was maintained. It became possible to join formed parts to
others with bolts by tapping screw threads to the hole or inlay-
ing a nut there.
5) Flat seal method was developed, wherein sealing is maintained
at the tube ends against the internal pressure while allowing the
deformation of the ends, and applying the developed method,
it became possible to form parts having flanges along the
whole length.
The developed forming methods will certainly promote wider
application of hydroforming in the automotive and other industries.
Acknowledgements
The method of forming a high branch using movable dies de-
scribed in Subsection 2.1 was developed jointly with Toyota Motor
Corporation, and that of forming the cross-movable dies with re-
stricted expansion direction presented in Subsection 2.3 was devel-
oped jointly with Suzuki Motor Corporation. The authors would like
to express their deepest thanks for the cooperation of the two com-
panies in the development activities.
- 45 -
NIPPON STEEL TECHNICAL REPORT No. 103 MAY 2013
20) Mizumura, M. et al.: Proc. 56th Jpn. Joint Conf. Tech. Plasticity. 2005,
p. 189
21) Mizumura, M. et al.: Proc. 58th Jpn. Joint Conf. Tech. Plasticity. 2007,
p. 403
22) Mizumura, M. et al.: Proc. 2008 Jpn. Spring Conf. Tech. Plasticity. 2008,
p. 231
23) Uchida, M. et al.: Proc. 2010 Jpn. Spring Conf. Tech. Plasticity. 2010,
p. 181
24) Mizumura, M. et al.: Proc. 2009 Jpn. Spring Conf. Tech. Plasticity. 2009,
p. 421
- 46 -