Unified OPCR 2018

RPMS - OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: ___________________ Name of Rater: SEGUNDINO A. MADJOS JR. RATEE: _______________________
Position: ____________________ Position: ASSISTANT SCHOOLS DIVISION
Review Period: JANUARY - DECEMBER 2018 SUPERINTENDENT RATER: SEGUNDINO A. MADJOS JR.
School: ______________________ Date of Review: DECEMBER 2018 Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Division TANDAG CITY School Year: 2018-2019 APPROVED: GREGORIA T. SU, Ph.D.
Schools Division Superintendent
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING/EVALUATION TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

AVE. WEIGHT
MFOs KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE T PER CATEGOR (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ED
Y RATING RATING
KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
Basic I. 1.1 Accounted for learning
Quality 100% of the total number of students achieved at least 75% GSA in all subject areas
Educati Instruction outcomes of schools viz-a-
on al viz goals/targets 100% from the total 85% from the total 75% from the total 70% from the total 69% and below from
Service Leadershi a. Quarterly number of students number of students number of students number of students the total number of
s p (30%) Assessment
shall have a GSA of shall have a GSA shall have a GSA of shall have a fairly students shall have
JAN-
10% at least (75% and (75% and up) in all at least (75% and satisfactory GSA of a fairly satisfactory
DEC
up) in all subject subject areas at the up) in all subject at least (75% and GSA (75% and up)
2018 Efficiency
areas at the close of close of the school areas at the close of up) in all subject in all subject areas
the school year. year. the school year. areas at the close of at the close of the
the school year. school year.
Timeliness Conducted quarterly examination (March- Q4, August-Q1, October-Q2, January-Q3) with submission of MPS 7 days
after the examination
result MPS submission MPS submission on 1-3 days late of 4-5 days late 6 days or more late
before due date due date (7 days after submission submission submission
the exam)
Quality decreased frustration level in reading by at least 2%


AVE. WEIGHT
Y RATING RATING
KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
1.2. By the end of 2018-2019, an decreased frustration decreased by 2-2.50% decreased 1.51%- decreased 1-1.49% decreased 0.99%
increase of 2% in the Reading level in reading by 3% 1.99% below
Level shall have been observed and up per grading
after the implementqtion of the
period both english
Reading Program through:
a. PHIL-IRI and filipino
JAN- DEC Efficiency
b. CLEAR 2018 10%
c. other reading
interventions
Timeliness
Conducted Pre-Test and Post Test as scheduled (June-Pre Test, February-Post Test) with 5 days PhilIRI
result submission after the conduct of the reading inventory
PhilIRI submission on due date 1-3 days late of 4-5 days late 6 days or more late
before due date submission submission submission
1.3 By the end of SY 2018- Quality Achieved 3% and up increase of MPS in all subject areas over the baseline
2019, MPS of all the
subject areas shall have
been increased by 2%
over the baseline JAN-
a. Regular DEC 5% Increased MPS of Increased MPS of Sustained the MPS A decrease of 1% in A decrease of more
conduct of classes 2018 Efficiency 3% and up in all 2% in any of the of all the subject all of the subject than 0.5% in all
b. Class subject areas subject areas areas areas subject areas
Remediation/
enhancement

AVE. WEIGHT
Y RATING RATING
KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
Least Learned Least Learned 1-3 days late of 4-5 days late 6 days or more late
submission to the div. submission on due submission submission submission
Timeliness
office before due date date (7 days after the
exam)
1.4 Performed instructional Performed Instructional Supervision: 57 and up for Principal, 53 and up for MT-SH and Head
supervision to achieve Quality Teachers, 36 and up for TIC/SIC) instructional observation within the rating period to achieve
learning outcomes learning outcomes
By the
Performed Performed 50-55 IS for 45-49 for Principals, 44 and below for
end of the SY 2018-2019,
instructional instructional Principals, 37-42 for 30-36 for MT-Shand Principals, 29 and
35 or more teaching-
supervision: 57 supervision: 56 for MT-SH and HTs, 29- HTs, 23-28 for below for MT-SH
learning observations shall
and up for Principals, 42 for MT- 34 for TIC/HIC TIC/SIC and HTs, 22 and
have been conducted to
Principals, 43 and up SH and HTs, 35 for below for TIC/SIC
enhance teacher's JAN- Efficiency
for MT-SH and HTs, TIC/SIC
competence using: DEC 5% 36 and up for
a. STAR Approach 2018 TIC/SIC
b. CB Past Form
3A and 3B
c.
Teacher Standard
Timeliness
Performed instructional observations per observation month Jan., Feb., July, Aug., Sept.,
Oct., Nov.
II. 2.1 Provided safe and child-

LEARNING friendly environment through JAN-
DEC 5% Quality Met all the criteria in providing safe and child friendly learning environment
ENVIRONM manifestation/observance of:
ENT (10%) 2018

AVE. WEIGHT
Y RATING RATING
KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
10 or more criteria 8-9 of the criteria 6-7 of the criteria 4-5 of the critera met 1-3 of the criteria
a. well-structured classrooms Efficiency met met met met
b. upkept school premises
c. facelifted physical facilities
d. properly installed elect. wirings
e. functional WinS
f. operational canteen
g. functional C.R.
h. proper drainage
i. proper waste segregation
j.perimeter fence
k. school gate
l. security guard/watchman
Timeliness observed/sustained in all in 3 quarters only

in less than a
m. CCTV Camera quarters
in 2 quarters only in 1 quarter only quarter only
2.2 Strengthened the
implementation of the ff. JAN-
programs for the safety and DEC. 5% Quality Accomplished 100% of the target for each indicated program
ensured environment for the 2018
learners and personnel

AVE. WEIGHT
Y RATING RATING
KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
100% of target had 90%-99% of target 80%-89% of target 70%-79% of target 70% below of target
a. CFSS Efficiency been accomplished had been had been had been had been
accomplished accomplished accomplished accomplished
b. Child Protection Policy

c. SBFP / Health Prog.
d. DRRM
e. NDEP
f. ESWM
g. Organized committees,
focal persons
g. Organized committees,
focal persons
h. drainage Timeliness Implemented the program as scheduled in the activity design for the conduct
III. HUMAN 3.1 Provided technical
RESOURCE assistance to teachers on
MANAGEME enhancement of classroom JAN-
NT AND management skills and Provided technical assistance to 75% of teacher population based on the teacher's need with
DEC. 5% Quality
DEVELOPM instructional competence as corresponding MOVs
ENT (10%) embedded in the result of:
2018

AVE. WEIGHT
Y RATING RATING
KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
a. TSNA 100% of teachers 81%-99% of 71%-80% of 51%-70% of 1%-50% of teachers
b. Accomplished provided technical teachers provided teachers provided teachers provided provided technical
Individual Devt. Plan assistance with technical assistance technical assistance technical assistance assistance
Efficiency
c. corresponding with corresponding with corresponding
Instructional Supervision evidences evidences evidences
Accomplished TSNA and IPPD - June

Timeliness
Conducted technical assistance every month
3.2 Professionally
developed SH/teachers
through:
a. seminars/
representations JAN-
Quality participated 6 or more seminars/representations in a year (teachers & SH); at least 1 INSET and
b. INSET DEC. 5% 4 SLACS in a year, and enrolled or finished post graduate studies
c. 2018
SLAC's/COPs
d. Post graduate studies
participated 6 or more participated 5 4 seminars/ 3 seminars / Conducted 1 ormore

seminars/representatio seminars/ representations, CAR representations, technical assistance,
Efficiency ns in a year (teachers representations, Full in Masteral Studies acquired 18 units and below 18 units
& SH); Ed D. or Ph. D. pledged MA Ed,CAR in above in masteral masteral studies
Holder Doctoral studies studies
conducted 1 INSET conducted 5 SLACs 3 SLACS only 2 and below SLACS

and 4 SLACS/year only

AVE. WEIGHT
Y RATING RATING
KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
Timeliness
Addressed the seminar/representation call up based on the memorandum; conducted INSET
and SLACS based on the Work Plan of the activity
IV. 3.1 Established school
PARENTS family and community
INVOLVEME partnership to improve
NT AND school performance JAN-
COMMUNIT Quality Organized and encouraged community stakeholders to support the school PAPS
DEC. 3%
Y
PARTNERS 2018
HIP
(10%)
a. Organized GPTA Organized Organized functional Organized GPTA Organized GPTA & Organized GPTA
b. Conducted at least 2 Functional GPTA GPTA &conducted 2 &Conducted 2 GPTA Conducted 1 GPTA
GPTA Meetings in a year &Conducted more meetings within a Meetings with in a Meetings with in a
than 2 meetings with school year 51-59% year with 50% below year
Efficiency in a school year with attendance attendance
60% to 100%
attendance
Organized GPTA within June to July, and conducted meeting in first and second semester
Timeliness

AVE. WEIGHT
Y RATING RATING
KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
3.2 By the end of the JAN-
school year, DEC.
linkages/network with PTA, 2018
LGU, GOs, NGOs shall 4% Quality Initiated and accomplished school worth 15,000 and up
have been strengthened
thru:
a. Initiating 1 project with Initiated and Initiated and Initiated and Initiated and Initiated and
external funding accomplished accomplished accomplished accomplished accomplished
sponsorship in a year School project worth School project worth School project worth School project worth School project worth
b. Accomplishing and Efficiency 15,000 up 11,000-14,000 5,000-10,000 3,000-4,000 2,000 and below.
utilizing Homeroom PTA
Projects
Timeliness Implemented the project within the year

During the Brigada
JAN-
Quality Generated
Eskwela and BE Plus, the reources amounting to 20,000 and up for large schools,sped and science schools;
DEC. 3% 10,000 and up for medium schools, and 5,000 and up for small schools
school shall have been
2018
generated/implemented
resurces with
generated internal and
resources Generated resources generated resources generated resources generated resources generated resources
external Adopt-A-School
through stakeholders' amounting to amounting to 15,000- amounting to 10,000- amounting to 5,000- amounting to 4,000
participation thereby
Program 20,000.00 and above 19,000 14,000 9,000 and below
Efficiency (for large schools,
creating a conducive
learning environment SPED and Science)
from stakeholders
ready for the opening of
classes through: (3%)
a.
Advocacy

AVE. WEIGHT
Y RATING RATING
KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
generated resources 5,000-9,000 3,000-4,000 1,000-2,000 900 and below
amounting to 10,000
and up for medium
schools
generated resources 3,000-4,000 1,000-2,000 500-900 400 and below
amounting to 5,000
and up for small
schools
Implemented Brigada Eskwela as sheduled memorandized, sustained it through Brigada
Timeliness Eskwela Plus and through and Adopt-A-School Program wholeyear round
V. SCHOOL 5.1 Performed school
LEADERSHI leadership, management and
P, operations functions through
MANAGEME crafting/revisiting/preparing/ JAN-
NT AND the following: DEC. 5% Quality Crafted/Revisited SIP/AIP/OPCR/WFP/MDP/APP/PPMP/SUPERVISORY PLAN
OPERATION 2018
S
30%
SIP/AIP/WFP/MDP/APP/P Crafted and lacking 1 lacking 2 lacking 3 none

PMP/SUPERVISORY implemented updated
PLAN/CLASS PROGRAM SIP, AIP, APP,MDP,
and submitted on time PPMP and WFP
Efficiency
Supervisory Plan,
Class Programand
submitted on time
SIP/AIP/WFP/Supervisory Plan every January

Timeliness

AVE. WEIGHT
Y RATING RATING
KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
Timeliness MDP/APP/PPMP every October-November
Class Program every June
5.2 Shall have submitted JAN-
monthly MOOE/SBFP DEC.
liquidation reports within 2018 5% Quality 100% Utilization and submission of MOOE monthly
the target date
Submitted monthly Submitted monthly Submitted monthly Submitted monthly Submitted monthly
MOOE liquidation MOOE liquidation on MOOE liquidation 5- MOOE liquidation MOOE liquidation 16
Efficienc before 30 days (due due date 9 days after due 10-15 days after due days or more after
y date) date date due date
Timeliness Monthly as indicated in the efficiency
5.3 Accounted attendance

JAN-
to duty/work, call ups , DEC. 5% Quality Observed strictly time on task and attendance to work and call ups
school and community 2018
activities
school and community 100 % attendance 1-5 absence during 6-10 absence during 11-15 absence 16 and above
activities and meetings excluding leave rating cycle the rating cycle during the rating absence during
benefits (Forced and cycle rating cycle
Special Leave) for SH
Efficiency
100% attendance to 80-99% 75-79% 70-74% 69% and below
call ups, flag
ceremony, school and
community activities

AVE. WEIGHT
Y RATING RATING
KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
Timeliness Accounted punctuality in work viz-a -viz efficiency indicator
5.4 By the end of every
month, monthly
supervisory/instructional
management plan/report,
accomplishment report JAN-
and other usual required DEC. 3% Quality Prepared and submitted accurate report
reports shall have been 2018
submitted
Submitted monthly Submitted monthly Submited monthly Submited monthly Submited monthly
Efficiency report before due report on the dealine report 1-2 days report 3-4 days report 5 days after
date after the deadline after the deadline the deadline
Timeliness Accounted punctuality in the report submission


AVE. WEIGHT
Y RATING RATING
KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
5.5 By the end of March,
key performance indicators
shall have been incresed
or sustained in a year like:
a. Cohort-Survival Rate
b. JAN-
Completion Rate DEC. 4% Quality Increased/Sustained the target on the performance indicators
c. Promotion Rate 2018
d.
Graduation Rate
e.enrolment rate
f. drop out rate
g. Failure Rate
Increased more than Increased 0.5-0.9% Sustained A decreased of 0.5- A decreased of 1%

1% and above performance 0.9% and above
indicators
Efficiency
0% drop out /failure 0.5% drop out/failure 0.6-1% drop 1.1-1.5% drop 1.6 or more percent
rate rate out/failure rate out/failure rate drop out/failure rate
Timeliness Conducted quarterly tracking of performance indicators


AVE. WEIGHT
Y RATING RATING
KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
5.6 Decreased by 2% the
Drop-out Rate
Through the conduct of the
ff.: * JAN-
Early Registration DEC. 4% Quality Conducted technical assistance to teachers as scheduled
* Community Mapping 2018
* Home Visitation
Decreased more Decreased by 2% Decreased by 1.5%- decreased by 0.1- No decrease at all

than 2% or 1.9% 1.4%
sustained if already
Efficiency attained 0% drop-out
rate
Timeliness Regularly tracked the activities to decrease the drop out rate within the SY
5.7 By the end of February
2018, underweight
learners shall have been JAN-
decreased by 2% through DEC. 4% Quality Implemented the required schedule for the School-Based Feeding Program in the School Year
the School Based Feeding 2018
Program

AVE. WEIGHT
Y RATING RATING
KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
Decreased more Decreased by 2% Decreased by 1.5% Decreased by 1% Decreased by 0.5%
Efficiency than 2%
Timeliness Implemented strictly the feeding program based on the memorandized schedule
VI. Add On For Coordinatorship-

Tasks 10% Conducted
seminar/training/activities JAN-
relative to the given task DEC Quality Conducted 5 4 3 2 1
2018
Conducted at least Conducted 4 Conducted 3 Conducted 2 Conducted 1

5
seminar/training seminar/training seminar/training seminar/training seminar/training
including activities including
Efficiency activities including activities including activities including activities
relative to the relative to the relative to the relative to the
relative to the given task given task given task given task
given task
Timeliness Conducted the seminar/training/activity as rfelected in the training or activity design


AVE. WEIGHT
Y RATING RATING
KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
Member to any committee 100% attendance
Quality and and involvement 90-99% 80-89% 70-79% 69% and below
Efficiency to call up to do the
related task
Recipient of Awards Recipient of Recipient of Recipient of Fourth and up No participation in

International and Regional Awards, Division Awards, awards, and any competitions
national awards, Second and Third Fourth and Fifth participants in the
First to Third Placers in the Placers in the cluster and
Placer in the Regional Level Regional division level
national, Competition and competitions, First competitions
First Placers in the to third Placers in
First Placer in the Division Level Cluster
Regional Level competitions,
Quality and
Efficiency Competitions Second and Third
Placers in the
division level
100% OVER-ALL ACCOMPLISHMENT (WEIGHTED RATING WITH ADJECTIVAL EQUIVALENT RATING)
Ratee: Rater: APPROVED:


AVE. WEIGHT
Y RATING RATING
KRA
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T
_______________ SEGUNDINO A. MADJOS, JR. GREGORIA T. SU, Ph.D.

School Head Assistant Schools Division Superintendent Schools Division Superintendent

Unified OPCR 2018

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Unified OPCR 2018

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Unified OPCR 2018

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the purpose of the RPMS - Office Performance Commitment Review Form?

What is the purpose of the RPMS - Office Performance Commitment Review Form?

What are the different categories evaluated in the form?

What are the different categories evaluated in the form?

RPMS - OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

Quality decreased frustration level in reading by at least 2%

WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

II. 2.1 Provided safe and child-

WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

Timeliness observed/sustained in all in 3 quarters only

WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

b. Child Protection Policy

WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

Accomplished TSNA and IPPD - June

participated 6 or more participated 5 4 seminars/ 3 seminars / Conducted 1 ormore

conducted 1 INSET conducted 5 SLACs 3 SLACS only 2 and below SLACS

WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

Timeliness Implemented the project within the year

WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

SIP/AIP/WFP/MDP/APP/P Crafted and lacking 1 lacking 2 lacking 3 none

SIP/AIP/WFP/Supervisory Plan every January

WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

Timeliness Monthly as indicated in the efficiency

5.3 Accounted attendance

WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

Timeliness Accounted punctuality in the report submission

WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

Increased more than Increased 0.5-0.9% Sustained A decreased of 0.5- A decreased of 1%

Timeliness Conducted quarterly tracking of performance indicators

WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

Decreased more Decreased by 2% Decreased by 1.5%- decreased by 0.1- No decrease at all

WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

VI. Add On For Coordinatorship-

Conducted at least Conducted 4 Conducted 3 Conducted 2 Conducted 1

Timeliness Conducted the seminar/training/activity as rfelected in the training or activity design

WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

Recipient of Awards Recipient of Recipient of Recipient of Fourth and up No participation in

100% OVER-ALL ACCOMPLISHMENT (WEIGHTED RATING WITH ADJECTIVAL EQUIVALENT RATING)

Ratee: Rater: APPROVED:

WEIGH PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ACTUAL RESULTS

_______________ SEGUNDINO A. MADJOS, JR. GREGORIA T. SU, Ph.D.

You might also like