Habit Misconduct Punctuality Attendance: Tardiness Is The
Habit Misconduct Punctuality Attendance: Tardiness Is The
Habit Misconduct Punctuality Attendance: Tardiness Is The
INTRODUCTION
According to school policy, tardy students may be warned the first two
times they arrive late. After that they may be given detentions and parents
can be consulted. They can also be sent to the principal’s office if the
problem persists. Teachers can help to solve the problem by starting all
classes punctually and giving short quizzes at the start of the lesson. The
cumulative marks for these quizzes will count for a percentage of the total
class assessment. This would encourage more students to be
punctual. Recognizing and rewarding students for punctuality would also
be useful.
It is also the reason why the most essential lessons and subject
matters are deliberated during this time. When students are late or are
absent during this time of the day, they, in effect, miss out most of the
essential lessons to be remembered, understood and it is a lot significant to
value time and practice being on time while punctual attendance is of
paramount importance in ensuring that all students have full access to the
curriculum. Valuable learning time is lost when students are absent or late.
Disadvantage of Cutting classes
In Partial Fulfillment of
BY:
JAZZLYNE BERDAN
GENALYN CRUZ
English Teacher
S.Y 2018-2019
Chapter 3
DISCUSSION
Arriving late to school can also mean that students miss out on
activities designed to build connections with their peers,
potentially impacting their social interactions and creating a
greater sense of alienation from their classmates.
So, how can teachers tackle the issue? The report suggests it is
generally not helpful for teachers to punish late students once
they get to class, because it could potentially aggravate the
situation.
A schoolwide plan
CONCLUSION
The most common reason on why UP students are tardy is that they wake
up late every morning. When UP students are tardy and they find the
subject as an influence, it is more likely that the subject is a major subject
and/or a subject inclined to science and technology. Additionally, when UP
students are tardy and they find the teacher as the influence, it is more
likely that the teacher is boring. Also, when UP students are tardy because
of works and activities, more often that these works are related to school
and academics. Lastly, there is no correlation between the course of the
UP students and their tardiness. Likewise, there is no correlation between
the year level of UP students and their tardiness. The course and year level
of a UP student are not enough basis to predict whether that student will be
more or less likely to be tardy.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The sample respondents were relatively small compared to the whole population of
UP Cebu. Stronger data and conclusions can be derived if a larger sample will be
studied and the margin of error will be at minimum.
2. It will also be helpful if more reasons are served to the respondents. This will expose
more areas of concern and even reveal more interesting correlations.
3. The effects of the subject, teacher and untimely works were related only to the whole
sample of respondents. More correlations and findings can arise if we study these
factors per course or year level.