SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.798382
R Square 0.637413
Adjusted R 0.425905
Standard E 2.205607
Observatio 20

ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 7 102.6236 14.66051 3.013649 0.045034
Residual 12 58.37644 4.864704
Total 19 161

Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%
Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%
Intercept 86.49638 4.436638 19.49593 1.88E-10 76.82978 96.16298 76.82978 96.16298
Verbal Rea 0.049535 0.028804 1.719729 0.111143 -0.01322 0.112293 -0.01322 0.112293
Numerical 0.09719 0.031723 3.06371 0.009831 0.028072 0.166308 0.028072 0.166308
Abstract R -0.06411 0.042127 -1.52185 0.153952 -0.1559 0.027676 -0.1559 0.027676
Perceptual 0.050152 0.033898 1.479472 0.164781 -0.02371 0.12401 -0.02371 0.12401
Mechanical 0.0472 0.025792 1.830025 0.092184 -0.009 0.103397 -0.009 0.103397
Fear Anxie -0.29122 1.162637 -0.25048 0.806453 -2.82439 2.241949 -2.82439 2.241949
Use of Mat 0.006528 1.301468 0.005016 0.996081 -2.82913 2.842183 -2.82913 2.842183

RESIDUAL OUTPUT

Observation
Predicted Grade 10 Residuals
Grades
1 90.6492 1.350805
2 95.54709 -0.54709
3 94.39078 -0.39078
4 97.08491 1.915094
5 96.21509 0.784909
6 93.72167 -0.72167
7 91.24725 -0.24725
8 87.44991 2.55009
9 91.34116 1.658835
10 91.63669 -2.63669
11 93.17304 -2.17304
12 94.0214 -2.0214
13 93.25468 1.745316
14 91.87051 2.129492
15 90.90188 -0.90188
16 89.30595 -3.30595
17 90.9433 2.0567
18 91.52065 -1.52065
19 93.46531 0.534694
20 92.25955 -0.25955
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Verbal Reas
Regression Statistics 150
Numer

Grade 10 Grades
Multiple R 0.994417
100
R Square 0.988864 150
Adjusted R 0.906802 <<< This increased significantly. This is for the same dataset as 50

Grade 10 Grades
before but we are using a linear regression equation ythat does not 100
Standard E 12.11296 have the Y-axis intercept because we checked the zero intercept in 0 50
Observatio 20 the regression window. 10 20 30 40 50 6
0
Verbal0Rea
1
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F N
Regression 7 169378.6 24196.94 164.915 5.782019E-11
Residual 13 1907.408 146.7237 <<<This is considerably very small
Total 20 171286 compared to the previous result.

Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Verbal Rea 0.094496 0.157679 0.599293 0.559277 -0.246149405 0.435142 -0.246149 0.435142
Numerical 0.153824 0.173487 0.886659 0.39137 -0.220972261 0.52862 -0.220972 0.52862
Abstract R 0.302311 0.207057 1.460036 0.168022 -0.145008893 0.749631 -0.145009 0.749631
Perceptual 0.209173 0.180696 1.157597 0.267855 -0.181196844 0.599543 -0.181197 0.599543
Mechanical -0.0186 0.14043 -0.13244 0.896667 -0.321979377 0.284783 -0.321979 0.284783
Fear Anxie 4.841025 6.219248 0.778394 0.450273 -8.594843251 18.27689 -8.594843 18.27689
Use of Mat 6.621475 6.90035 0.959585 0.354772 -8.28582488 21.52878 -8.285825 21.52878
New Regression equation is: Grade 10 rating is equals 0.09VerbalR plus 0.15 NumericalR plus 0.30 AbstractR
plus 0.21 PerceptualR - 0.02 MechanicalR plus 4.84 FearA plus 6.62UseofMath

RESIDUAL OUTPUT PROBABILITY OUTPUT

Observation
Predicted Grade 10 Residuals
Grades PercentileGrade 10 Grades
1 97.85804 -5.85804 2.5 86
2 82.85905 12.14095 7.5 89
3 98.11981 -4.11981 12.5 90
4 110.0411 -11.0411 17.5 90
5 99.93951 -2.93951 22.5 90
6 84.77822 8.22178 27.5 91
7 87.16479 3.835215 32.5 91
8 74.14308 15.85692 37.5 92
9 82.96729 10.03271 42.5 92
10 79.81756 9.182435 47.5 92
11 108.3511 -17.3511 52.5 93
12 92.7483 -0.7483 57.5 93
13 108.001 -13.001 62.5 93
14 98.98221 -4.98221 67.5 94
15 89.00417 0.995831 72.5 94
16 89.3235 -3.3235 77.5 94
17 77.5738 15.4262 82.5 95
18 99.6306 -9.6306 87.5 95
19 79.82519 14.17481 92.5 97
20 87.49461 4.505394 97.5 99
 Verbal Reasoning Line Fit Plot
150
Numerical Reasoning Line Fit Plot
Grade 10 Grades

100 Grade 10 Grades

150
50 Abstract Reasoning Line Fit Plot
Predicted Grade 10
Grade 10 Grades

100 Grades
Grade 10 Grades
0 50 150
Perceptual Speed and Line Fit Plot
Predicted Grade 10
Grade 10 Grades

10 20 30 40 50 60 70100
80 90100 Grades
0 Grade 10 Grades
Verbal0Reasoning
0 50 0 0150 0 0
1 3 5 7 9 11 Mechanical Engineering Line Fit Plot
Predicted Grade 10
Grade 10 Grades

0 Grades
100 Grade 10 Grades
Numerical Reasoning 150
0 0 0 0 0
2 450 6 8 10
Predicted Grade 10
Fear Anxiety Line Fit Plot
Grade 10 Grades

100 Grades
Grade 10 Grades
Abstract
0 Reasoning50 150
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
0
Predicted Grade 10
Grade 10 Grades
Grades Use of Math In Line Fit Plot
100 Grade 10 Grades
Perceptual 0 Speed and 150 0
20 50 40 60 8 10
0 Predicted Grade 10

Grade 10 Grades
Grades
100 Grade 10 Grades
Mechanical
0 Engineering Predicted Grade 10
2 2.5 50 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 Grades
Fear
0 Anxiety
2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5
Use of Math In

plus 0.30 AbstractR

 Normal Probability Plot
110

Grade 10 Grades
100
90
80
70
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Sample Percentile

Fit Plot
ability plot is the same as the previous normal probability plot but with the plot or graph beginning at the origin (0,0) of the 2-dimensiona

Grade 10 Grades
Predicted Grade 10
Grades
 Grade 10 Grades
Verbal Reasoning
Numerical Reasoning
Abstract Reasoning
Perceptual
Mechanical
Speed andEngineering
Fear
UseAnxiety
of Math In Everyday Life
Grade 10 1
Verbal Rea 0.449593 1
Numerical 0.548586 0.374315511 1
Abstract R 0.166972 0.565209012 0.572616 1
Perceptual -0.11795 -0.455578269 -0.54105 -0.59838 1
Mechanical0.464395 0.469320958 0.385199 0.450769 -0.51486 1
Fear Anxie 0.169328 -0.007328976 0.294995 0.178788 -0.09124 0.328067 1
Use of Mat0.189276 1.282259E-17 0.088989 0.016619 0.310502 0.102466 0.6502 1
These are highly correlated.
These are moderately highly correlated.
These are weakly or very weakly correlated. B13 D15

he correlation matrix for the Grade 10 Rating by identifying which variables can be dropped from the regression equation using all the inde
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Numerical Reaso
Regression Statistics 150
Perceptual

Grade 10 Grades
Multiple R 0.992528 100
R Square 0.985112 150
50
Adjusted R 0.924537

Grade 10 Grades
0 100
Standard E 12.24762
10 3 50 50
0 70
Observatio 20
Numerical
0 Reason
ANOVA 0 20 4
df SS MS F Significance F Percep
Regression 3 168735.9 56245.31 374.9581 4.96E-15
Residual 17 2550.072 150.0042
Total 20 171286

Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%
Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Numerical 0.314459 0.156601 2.008026 0.060803 -0.01594 0.644858 -0.01594 0.644858
Perceptual 0.050207 0.149689 0.335407 0.741422 -0.26561 0.366022 -0.26561 0.366022
Use of Mat 15.96914 3.192308 5.002381 0.000109 9.23396 22.70432 9.23396 22.70432

RESIDUAL OUTPUT PROBABILITY OUTPUT

Observation
Predicted Grade 10 Residuals
Grades Percentile
Grade 10 Grades
1 93.6142 -1.6142 2.5 86
2 94.2522 0.747796 7.5 89
3 92.76711 1.232894 12.5 90
4 111.1779 -12.1779 17.5 90
5 102.4138 -5.41383 22.5 90
6 81.34993 11.65007 27.5 91
7 90.85284 0.147162 32.5 91
8 77.22123 12.77877 37.5 92
9 85.33748 7.662524 42.5 92
10 79.31256 9.687445 47.5 92
11 107.9937 -16.9937 52.5 93
12 89.48512 2.514882 57.5 93
13 110.1711 -15.1711 62.5 93
14 98.26244 -4.26244 67.5 94
15 81.29705 8.702948 72.5 94
16 85.46532 0.534683 77.5 94
17 60.90064 32.09936 82.5 95
18 102.9518 -12.9518 87.5 95
19 84.07116 9.928841 92.5 97
20 92.04872 -0.04872 97.5 99
 Numerical Reasoning Line Fit Plot
150
Perceptual Speed and Line Fit Plot
Grade 10 Grades

100
Grade 10 Grades
50 150
Use of Math In Line Fit Plot
Predicted Grade 10
Grade 10 Grades

0 Grades
100 Grade 10 Grades
150
10 0
3 50 5 0 7 0 9 0
11
0
Normal Probability Plot
Predicted Grade 10
Grade 10 Grades

100 Grades
Grade 10 Grades
Numerical
0 Reasoning
50 110 Predicted Grade 10
Grade 10 Grades

0 20 40 60 80 100 100 120 Grades

0
Perceptual Speed90and
0 20 40 60 80 1 0 0
80
Use
70 of Math In
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Sample Percentile
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Numerical Rea
Regression Statistics 150
Verba

Grade 10 Grades
Multiple R 0.969892 100
R Square 0.940691 150
50
Adjusted R 0.87489

Grade 10 Grades
0 100
Standard E 24.44535
10 3 50 50
0 7
Observatio 20 0.637006 0.035582
Numerical
0 Re
ANOVA 10 20
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 3 161127.2 53709.07 89.87833 3.154451E-10
Residual 17 10158.78 597.5753
Total 20 171286

Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Numerical 0.951056 0.197169 4.823563 0.000159 0.535066168 1.367046 0.535066 1.367046
Verbal Rea 0.342347 0.267421 1.280181 0.217675 -0.221861421 0.906556 -0.22186 0.906556
Mechanical -0.03654 0.253691 -0.14403 0.887169 -0.57178149 0.498702 -0.57178 0.498702

RESIDUAL OUTPUT PROBABILITY OUTPUT

Observation
Predicted Grade 10 Residuals
Grades PercentileGrade 10 Grades
1 63.04871 28.95129 2.5 86
2 98.51492 -3.51492 7.5 89
3 110.9356 -16.9356 12.5 90
4 122.2388 -23.2388 17.5 90
5 113.307 -16.307 22.5 90
6 95.97152 -2.97152 27.5 91
7 68.83601 22.16399 32.5 91
8 45.67103 44.32897 37.5 92
9 95.08939 -2.08939 42.5 92
10 84.27214 4.727861 47.5 92
11 102.2625 -11.2625 52.5 93
12 101.5722 -9.57218 57.5 93
13 109.1603 -14.1603 62.5 93
14 100.6921 -6.69213 67.5 94
15 80.82937 9.170635 72.5 94
16 71.41036 14.58964 77.5 94
17 63.37132 29.62868 82.5 95
18 79.08419 10.91581 87.5 95
19 97.97267 -3.97267 92.5 97
20 29.15014 62.84986 97.5 99
 Numerical Reasoning Line Fit Plot
150
Verbal Reasoning Line Fit Plot
Grade 10 Grades

100
Grade 10 Grades
50 150
Mechanical Engineering Line Fit Plot
Predicted Grade 10
Grade 10 Grades

0 Grades
100 Grade 10 Grades
150
10 0
3 50 5 0 7 0 9 0
11
0
Normal Probability Plot
Predicted Grade 10
Grade 10 Grades

100 Grades
Grade 10 Grades
Numerical
0 Reasoning
50 110 Predicted Grade 10
Grade 10 Grades

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90100
100 Grades
0
Verbal Reasoning
90 0
0 20 4 60 80 1 0 0
80
Mechanical
70 Engineering
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Sample Percentile
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Numerical Reaso
Regression Statistics 150
Norm

Grade 10 Grades
Multiple R 0.966695 100
R Square 0.934499 110
50
Adjusted R 0.881867

Grade 10 Grades
0 100
Standard E 24.30015 90 0
10 30 5 70
Observatio 20 80
Numerical
70 Reason
ANOVA 0 20
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 160066.6 160066.6 271.0708 2.69E-12
Residual 19 11219.45 590.4973
Total 20 171286

Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%
Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Numerical 1.17083 0.071114 16.46423 1.06E-12 1.021988 1.319673 1.021988 1.319673

RESIDUAL OUTPUT PROBABILITY OUTPUT

Observation
Predicted Grade 10 Residuals
Grades Percentile
Grade 10 Grades
1 67.90816 24.09184 2.5 86
2 111.2289 -16.2289 7.5 89
3 104.2039 -10.2039 12.5 90
4 115.9122 -16.9122 17.5 90
5 113.5705 -16.5705 22.5 90
6 93.66642 -0.66642 27.5 91
7 67.90816 23.09184 32.5 91
8 48.00404 41.99596 37.5 92
9 108.8872 -15.8872 42.5 92
10 86.64144 2.358558 47.5 92
11 100.6914 -9.69141 52.5 93
12 93.66642 -1.66642 57.5 93
13 111.2289 -16.2289 62.5 93
14 97.17891 -3.17891 67.5 94
15 88.9831 1.016897 72.5 94
16 64.39567 21.60433 77.5 94
17 48.00404 44.99596 82.5 95
18 85.47061 4.529388 87.5 95
19 87.81227 6.187727 92.5 97
20 26.9291 65.0709 97.5 99
 Numerical Reasoning Line Fit Plot
150
Normal Probability Plot
Grade 10 Grades

100
Grade 10 Grades
50 110 Predicted Grade 10
Grade 10 Grades

0 100 Grades
90 0
10 30 5 70 90 11
0
80
Numerical
70 Reasoning
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Sample Percentile
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Numerical Reaso
Regression Statistics 150
Verbal R

Grade 10 Grades
Multiple R 0.969892 100
R Square 0.940691 150
50
Adjusted R 0.87489

Grade 10 Grades
0 100
Standard E 24.44535
10 3 50 50
0 70
Observatio 20
Numerical
0 Reason
ANOVA 10 20 30 4
df SS MS F Significance F Verb
Regression 3 161127.2 53709.07 89.87833 3.15E-10
Residual 17 10158.78 597.5753
Total 20 171286

Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%
Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Numerical 0.951056 0.197169 4.823563 0.000159 0.535066 1.367046 0.535066 1.367046
Verbal Rea 0.342347 0.267421 1.280181 0.217675 -0.22186 0.906556 -0.22186 0.906556
Mechanical -0.03654 0.253691 -0.14403 0.887169 -0.57178 0.498702 -0.57178 0.498702

RESIDUAL OUTPUT PROBABILITY OUTPUT

Observation
Predicted Grade 10 Residuals
Grades Percentile
Grade 10 Grades
1 63.04871 28.95129 2.5 86
2 98.51492 -3.51492 7.5 89
3 110.9356 -16.9356 12.5 90
4 122.2388 -23.2388 17.5 90
5 113.307 -16.307 22.5 90
6 95.97152 -2.97152 27.5 91
7 68.83601 22.16399 32.5 91
8 45.67103 44.32897 37.5 92
9 95.08939 -2.08939 42.5 92
10 84.27214 4.727861 47.5 92
11 102.2625 -11.2625 52.5 93
12 101.5722 -9.57218 57.5 93
13 109.1603 -14.1603 62.5 93
14 100.6921 -6.69213 67.5 94
15 80.82937 9.170635 72.5 94
16 71.41036 14.58964 77.5 94
17 63.37132 29.62868 82.5 95
18 79.08419 10.91581 87.5 95
19 97.97267 -3.97267 92.5 97
20 29.15014 62.84986 97.5 99
 Numerical Reasoning Line Fit Plot
150
Verbal Reasoning Line Fit Plot
Grade 10 Grades

100
Grade 10 Grades
50 150
Mechanical Engineering Line Fit Plot
Predicted Grade 10
Grade 10 Grades

0 Grades
100 Grade 10 Grades
150
10 0
3 50 5 0 7 0 9 0
11
0
Normal Probability Plot
Predicted Grade 10
Grade 10 Grades

100 Grades
Grade 10 Grades
Numerical
0 Reasoning
50 110 Predicted Grade 10
Grade 10 Grades

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90100
100 Grades
0
Verbal Reasoning
90 0
0 20 4 60 80 1 0 0
80
Mechanical
70 Engineering
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Sample Percentile
Grade 10 Grades Numerical Reasoning Verbal Reasoning
92 58 24
95 95 31
94 89 80
99 99 91
97 97 71
93 80 63
91 58 44
90 41 21
93 93 21
89 74 44
91 86 63
92 80 80
95 95 59
94 83 66
90 76 27
86 55 59
93 41 79
90 73 36
94 75 79
92 23 22
Mechanical Engineering Use of Math In
9 4.5
67 4
30 4
84 5
89 4.5
46 3.5
38 4.5
14 4
15 3.5
32 3.5
30 5
52 4
38 5
23 4.5
19 3.5
30 4.25
73 3
73 5
11 3.75
7 5

7
 Perceptual Speed and Fear Anxiety Abstract Reasoning
70 3.2 89
10 3.6 68
18 4 92
4 5 98
1 4.2 98
6 4 78
15 4.4 68
9 3.8 64
4 4 78
3 3.8 75
22 5 92
9 3.4 96
9 5 97
6 4.2 96
30 4 87
6 3.6 96
2 3.4 94
3 5 94
12 2.4 73
99 4.2 26

. The higher the corrrelation (either positively or negatively) the more each of the two are complimentary variables. This means, only one o
 Post Test Results
47
43
43
47
47
45
41
42
44
41
44
42
46
47
37
46
39
38
36
44

les. This means, only one of the pair can be used as a factor because using both will "relatively"duplicate the effect oof each of the variable
Grade 10 Grades Verbal Reasoning Numerical Reasoning Abstract Reasoning
92 24 58 89
95 31 95 68
94 80 89 92
99 91 99 98
97 71 97 98
93 63 80 78
91 44 58 68
90 21 41 64
93 21 93 78
89 44 74 75
91 63 86 92
92 80 80 96
95 59 95 97
94 66 83 96
90 27 76 87
86 59 55 96
93 79 41 94
90 36 73 94
94 79 75 73
92 22 23 26

This is a bette rmodel or regression equation using only three independen

 Perceptual Speed and Mechanical Engineering Fear Anxiety
70 9 3.2
10 67 3.6
18 30 4
4 84 5
1 89 4.2
6 46 4
15 38 4.4
9 14 3.8
4 15 4
3 32 3.8
22 30 5
9 52 3.4
9 38 5
6 23 4.2
30 19 4
6 30 3.6
2 73 3.4
3 73 5
12 11 2.4
99 7 4.2

on equation using only three independent variables instead of 4 variables.

 Use of Math In Mechanical Engineering Fear Anxiety Abstract Reasoning
4.5 9 3.2 89
4 67 3.6 68
4 30 4 92
5 84 5 98
4.5 89 4.2 98
3.5 46 4 78
4.5 38 4.4 68
4 14 3.8 64
3.5 15 4 78
3.5 32 3.8 75
5 30 5 92
4 52 3.4 96
5 38 5 97
4.5 23 4.2 96
3.5 19 4 87
4.25 30 3.6 96
3 73 3.4 94
5 73 5 94
3.75 11 2.4 73
5 4.2 26

. The higher the corrrelation (either positively or negatively) the more each of the two are complimentary variables. This means, only one o
 Verbal Reasoning Post Test Results
24 47
31 43
80 43
91 47
71 47
63 45
44 41
21 42
21 44
44 41
63 44
80 42
59 46
66 47
27 37
59 46
79 39
36 38
79 36
22 44

les. This means, only one of the pair can be used as a factor because using both will "relatively"duplicate the effect oof each of the variable