Plato and The Painters

Plato and the Painters
Author(s): Nancy Demand

Source: Phoenix, Vol. 29, No. 1 (Spring, 1975), pp. 1-20
Published by: Classical Association of Canada
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1087580
Accessed: 12-12-2018 19:17 UTC
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1087580?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Classical Association of Canada is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Phoenix
This content downloaded from 146.95.253.17 on Wed, 12 Dec 2018 19:17:14 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
PLATO AND THE PAINTERS
NANCY DEMAND
R EMARKS ABOUT PAINTERS AND PAINTING are to be found throughout

Plato's dialogues, from the early Ion to the Laws, occurring as examples,
analogies, and figures of speech. They exist not in and for themselves,
but as ancillary to other ends: the painter is seen in contrast to, or as
similar to, the sophist; he is viewed as analogous to the poet; painting
provides illustrations of the deception of the senses and of the origins of
language. Moreover, in the course of his work, Plato expresses more than
one attitude toward painting, ranging from simple commendation to
strong attack. Some of his comments betray a fairly extensive knowledge
of the techniques employed by the contemporary painter and seem to
reflect the artistic controversies of his day.
A number of recent studies have considered Plato's references to
painting in their historical context; however, these studies have failed
achieve agreement on fundamental points. In 1933 Schuhl suggested t
Plato was motivated in his rejection of modern painting by his sympat
with an archaizing school of painters: Plato took sides in a battle betwe
the ancients and the moderns.' However, the existence of such an archa
ing school in the early fourth century has been called into questio
and Schuhl's thesis has not found support. Nevertheless, he restated i
with additional documentation, in a second edition in 1952.
A quite different explanation of Plato's relationship with contempora
painting also appeared in 1933, in an article by Steven.3 Steven suggest
that Plato opposed illusionistic painting and favored the Peloponnesian
(Sicyonian) school of painters, of which at least Eupompus and Pa
philus would have been active during Plato's lifetime. According to Plin
Pamphilus was "the first painter highly educated in all branches
learning, especially arithmetic and geometry, without the aid of whi
he maintained art could not attain perfection."' He introduced drawin
into the curriculum,5 and was noted for his theoretical knowledge. H
'Pierre-Maxime Schuhl, Platon et I'art de son temps (Paris 1933; second edition, revis
and augmented, 1952).
2By both T. B. L. Webster (review of Schuhl, CR 48 [1934] 239) and R. K. Hac
(review of Schuhl, CP 30 [1935] 273-275).
3R. G. Steven, "Plato and the Art of His Time," CZ 27 (1933) 149-155. A kinship
ideas between Plato and the Sicyonian school had earlier been suggested by E. Pfuh
Malerei und Zeichnung der Griechen (Munich 1923) 2.729.
4Pliny HN 35.76 (tr. Rackham).
6Ibid. 35.77; Quint. 12.10.1-10.
1
PHOENIX, Vol. 29 (1975) 1.
2 PHOENIX
work was known

been seen in the
which dates from
which was based
to have made its
century. Steven
provided him wit
Steven's thesis w
not gained univ
controversy by
Plato inveighed
that the enemy o
pletely reversed
influenced by th
of great importa
marked change f
of external influ
was triggered by
school. As we not
at least by 388, a
awareness of the
in Plato's work (P
the fact that Plat
vagueness and "im
linear perspectiv
of mathematical
tive, Schweitzer's
Two factors sugg
to painting is in
ment in existing
6Aristophanes Plutu
TSee Karl Schefold,
Zeichnung der klassi
8Webster (above, no
SymbOslo 29 (1952)
(London 1956) 150; r
gBernhard Schweitz
82-87. Hack also rej
"OWebster in partic
448-449), although i
the Philebus, Sophis
"Gnomon 26 (1954)
12A. W. Byvanck,
Kunst in den Tijd va
429-475.
PLATO AND THE PAINTERS 3
contemporary schools of painting. Th

zer's hypothesis-that Plato's attitu
clearly defined shift-has implicatio
sidered. The main purpose of the p
examine these two points; the met
remarks on painting in their most lik
the context of contemporary painting
BEFORE THE REPUBLIC
Plato's earliest reference to painting occurs in the

where painting is given as an example of a techne, and P
475-447 B.c.) is mentioned as a representative painter.13
the painter is again taken as a representative possess
contrast to the sophist. The painters mentioned are
Aristophon's brother, Polygnotus (448b), and Zeuxi
"modern" painter who was active in the last third of th
At 430c, painting is classified as a techne: it is an art w
ends by action rather than words. At 503e, the painter
same category as the builder, the shipwright, the phys
the doctor, all of whom bring harmony and order to th
which they work.
In the Protagoras, the painter again appears (312d) as a
of those who possess techne, in contrast to the sophist,
a techne, but only a knack (ipreLpla Kal 7p4li, Gorgias 4
contrast between the painter as a possessor of techne
as a non-possessor appears again at Protagoras 318b-c
again mentioned as a representative painter.
These are the only references to specific painters by n
works. In each case, the painter is viewed as a desirable
community, and as the possessor of techne. At times he i
par with the builder and the doctor. Plato's choice of a
painter lights indifferently upon the "old-fashioned" Po
13Webster, OCD2, s.v. "Polygnotus;" so also Lippold, "Polygnot

1630. Pliny dates him before 420 B.c. (HN 35.58). For the ancient evid
and other painters, see J. J. Pollitt, The Art of Greece 1100-31 B.C
N.J. 1965), and J. Overbeck, Die antiken Schriftquellen zur bilden
Griechen (Leipzig 1868).
"1Aristophon, brother of Polygnotus (schol. Gorg. 448b), was still liv
Alcibiades (Plut. Alc. 16), who was born ca 450.
1"Zeuxis of Heracles, a follower of Apollodorus the shadow paint
master's techniques to new heights (Pliny HN 35.62). Pliny dat
rejecting an earlier date of 424 (HN 35.61). In the Protagoras (dram
is pictured as young and a newcomer to Athens; his rose-wreathed
Aristophanes's Acharnians 991-992 (425 B.c.).
4 PHOENIX
brother Aristoph
dorus, the creato
Plato will soon co
In the Cratylus,
extended analogy
And when we have c

apply each letter acco
single thing, or man
nesses sometimes app
mix together many c
thing, each figure se
one thing, making w
nouns and verbs. And
whole, just as the pa
The analogy is ex
to the nature of
picture" (430e). F
truth:
If we can assign nam

true, and others fals
give the proper one
also be possible to do
the statements made
to pictures, it is pos
and again not to put
them all in creates a
away, although he a
These passages m
painting, yet the
about painting in
may call true pai
color and shape an
recurs in the Sop
also compares pic
the writer in the
pictures of false
Laws, this notion
its subject correc
have the arrange
proper respective
maintained in po
may occur under
and deliberate di
the Cratylus? There is no suggestion

distortion, and the calm, unemotio
painter strongly suggests that he has
inherent in skiagraphia. In fact, the
occurs in the Phaedo, and there we al
moralistic condemnation which soon
attitude toward painting:
That "virtue" which is based not on wisdom

against each other is, I suspect, only a decep
nothing sound or true in it. (Phaedo 69b)
What was this dangerous shadow p

by cross-hatching had been used oc
date early in the fifth century, but o
as metal and clothing; by the turn of
bodies of men and on animals."' Ho
cross-hatching was merely a foreshad
niques of rendering shadow and light
and called skiagraphia. The archaeolog
slight. The method did not lend itself
has survived most successfully, vase p
dependent upon literary sources, and
paintings.'8 Plutarch tells us that wh
mixture of colors and the creation of
(,0opdv Kai ar6Xppwat KLaS).19 Anot

(s.v. aKLa): "Shading, an appearance
16A. Rumpf, "Classical and Post Classical
1"Mary H. Swindler, Ancient Painting (N
examples; see for instance Furtwingler and Re
1909) 3.20 and fig. 99 (fragment of a krater, p
and 61, fig. 27 (krater by Python, British
painters shows connections with wall-pain
interest in light and highlighting on vases
diadems, and other objects, for example, the f
Attic Red-Figured Vase-Painters2 (Oxford 1
Painting (Geneva 1959) 148 ff., 161 ff.; G. M
Haven 1958, revised edition) 154-155.
"8For instance, the Odyssey landscape at the
Greek Art4 [London 1965] fig. 392) and the w
Livia at Prima Porta (ibid., fig. 394); however
Painting?" AJA 77 (1973) 216-217.
"oPlut. Moralia 346a. Elsewhere Plutarch off
XpwAd6TrwV Ol [wypd&oO Oop&s bvoCr4fo
found only here, but the related word d~rox
sense, "to take a tone from a neighboring
Laws 769a.
6 PHOENIX
color" (Kiaats, eko

replaced outlining
areas. The contra
Halicarnassus:
Ancient paintings were done with simple coloring, with no dappled mixtures (Aiylyaa
7roLKIXlav) of pigments, and with precisely drawn lines, all of which made these wo
very pleasing. Later paintings were less well drawn, but more elaborately worked
with the dappled effects of light and shade (MK^ re Kal 4wl rOLKLroXXM6/peva), and
their strength in the very preponderance of these methods. (de Isaeo iudic. 4)
Plato himself offers excellent clues to the nature of skiagraphia in t

Republic and later dialogues. Perhaps the most revealing passage
found in the Parmenides:
It is just as in a shadow painting, in which the parts appear to be all one and the same
and alike to someone standing far away, but, to someone approaching, these same parts
appear to be many and varied, and, owing to the visual effects (0av'r&Arara) of con-
trasting colors, the colors appear changed and unlike themselves. (Prm. 165c-d)
In several other passages Plato refers to the incomprehensibility of such

paintings when viewed at close range,20 suggesting the application of
pigment in flecks and dabs. A dappling technique is also suggested by
Critias 107b-d, which describes a landscape portrayed by vague and
indistinct forms, as well as by Aristotle's remark about colors applied
xB'Vnv, confusedly or indiscriminately (Poetics 1450 b 2). Another aspect
of skiagraphia is indicated by Plato's use of the word a&roxpaivetv to
denote the intensification and alteration of colors achieved by juxta-
position ("colors taking their tone from their placement beside each
other so that each seems intense," r% TrI 7rap' &aXXp ias 0lawos a roxpawvopAvacs,
Ca)re a#obpoiVs EK~rTpaO 4pacveaOac, Resp. 586c). Still another aspect of skia-
graphia, the interest of these painters in optical phenomena, is reflected in
Republic 602c-d, where refraction and the effect of color on the perception
of shape are mentioned, and in Sophist 236a, where Plato speaks of optical
corrections.
The term "skiagraphia" itself suggests a predominant interest in th

effects of light. This is confirmed by an account of the general develo
ment of painting given by Pliny:
At last art gave variety to itself and discovered light and shade, the various jux
positions of colors enhancing each color by contrast. Next splendor was introduced, qu
another effect from light. The transition from light to shade they called "tone," w
the blending together and transition of colors was called "harmony." (HN 35.29)
Shirley Barlow has found indirect evidence of this interest in light in

literary sphere, where she has pointed out the special interest shown
Euripides in the effects of light and color, an interest which she believ
20Resp. 523b, 598b-c; Soph. 234b-c; Tht. 208e; Phlb. 41e-42a.
reflects the interests of contemporary p

century Greek attempt to depict the eff
painting of the nineteenth century.22
noted the similarity between ninetee
skiagraphic painting.23 A number of
There is a common interest in observ
light, ineliminating lines as boundar
juxtaposition and gradation of colors.24
layman, however, is the parallel in the
Plato tells us that skiagraphic paintings
range, for the "parts" of the painting
other, whereas from a distance they
comprehensible as objects.25 Such optic
teenth-century Impressionistic paint
phenomenon of lustre (the "splendor" o
says of Seurat's Un Dimanche a la Grand
If one stands one foot from the painting ... one
colors in any given small area; but upon moving
and coalesce until one reaches a point about twe
is complete and the individual colored strokes a
point is reached . . . effects of partial fusion or
The technique of skiagraphia contin

greater representation of depth and
painting. The earlier manifestations of
discovery of linear perspective,27 which
by the painter Agatharchus in the scene
Aeschylus (De Arch. 7, pr. 11). This m
the production of the Oresteia,28 or it ma
21Shirley Barlow, The Imagery of Euripides (

22Ibid., 135 n. 37.
23Schuhl2 (above, note 1) 11 and n. 3. Pfuhl
sees a possible theoretical root of Greek impre
Eva Keuls discussed the parallels in a paper rea
see AJA 77 (1973) 216-217.
24W. I. Homer, Seurat and the Science of Pain
25Euripides had noticed this as early as 423 B
26Homer (above, note 24) 143.
27But found also as early as the complex overla
(Rome, Villa Guilia, CVA 1, pls. 1-4), and gain
when there is definite acceleration of experimen
dimensional space. On the "Kavalier perspect
Reichhold (above, note 17) 676, but see also
7dI 2519-23.
(1912) (1910) 12-28; 7dl 27 (1912) 227-231; an
28T. B. L. Webster, Greek Art and Literature
8 PHOENIX
was a posthumou
clear that exper
quarter of the fi
mentation. He m
name, and yet w
had any real aw
painters experim
demonstrates a c
see in these earli
nation which he
Zeuxis the innov
respect in Plato's
Yet, by the time
painter in full sw
THE PAINTER IN THE REPUBLIC
There are a number of references to painting in th

order of their occurrence in the dialogue we find:
(1) 2.365c: "I must draw about myself a shadow pa
stage setting, a mere appearance."
(2) 2.377e: The poets should be subject to censorshi
be permitted to retell traditional stories which are d
gods, such as Hesiod's account of Uranus's treatment
revenge of Cronos (377e), and other stories of enm
deception among the gods (378c-d). Plato resorts to an
painter: when the poet tells such stories, he is "like a
something which is not a likeness of what he wish
(377e).
(3) 3.400d-401a: Painting is numbered among the craf
which foster good speech, good accord, good grace
(compare Gorgias 503e).
(4) 5.472d: Socrates argues that it is the legislator's
models or ideals, not to demonstrate the possibility o
The case is seen as analogous to that of the painter:
Do you think that he would be any the less a good painter who, p
sentation of say, the most handsome man, and rendering all
properly, should not also be able to prove that such a man can
(5) 6.484c-d: Philosophers should rule. After all, Socra

would appoint a blind watchman:
29Rumpf (above, note 16) 10-21. Pfuhl also dates the discovery t
fifth century, although he would give credit for the discovery to
3) 676, but see also Pfuhl and Sch6ne (above, note 27).
Do those who are truly deprived of the kno

the blind--those who have no clear patter
look to the truest things, and always go
exactly as possible, so that they can esta
and good, when it is necessary to estab
established?
(6) 6.488a: Socrates says, of his own use of imagery, "it is necessary to
combine many things... as painters do when they paint goat-stags and
such creatures."
(7) 6.500e-501c: The legislator's work is likened to the work of the
painter:
No city could ever prosper unless painters using a divine pattern drew its lines ....
Taking the city and the habits of men like a tablet, first they will wipe it clean .... And
then, after this, wouldn't they sketch out (Owroyp&daOae0a) the outline (aXija) of the
constitution? ... And then, in completing their work they would look frequently in both
directions, towards the just and noble and wise in nature (4ait), and again towards
what they were creating in men, mixing and blending the image of man (7"b -rVpeLKfXov)
from customs and usages .... And they would wipe away portions, and paint them
again, until they had rendered human ways as pleasing to the gods as possible ....
And that would be the noblest painting.
(8) 7.523b: A remark about perceptions which "call the mind to reflection
because the perception makes nothing clear," draws the response, "It's
clear that you mean things seen from a distance, and shadow painting."
(9) 7.529b: It is absurd to expect to find truth in diagrams drawn by a
Daedalus or by some other painter.
(10) 9.583b: "The pleasure of things other than intelligence is not com-
pletely real or pure, but is a kind of shadow painting."
(11) 9.586b: Such pleasures (those other than intelligence) are "phantoms
of true pleasure and shadow paintings, their colors taking their tone
(&roxpalvetv) from their placement beside each other so that each seems
intense."
(12) 10.596e-602d: The painter is a deliberate deceiver, a wizard (602d).

He only imitates what the craftsmen create: the carpenter's bed is a copy
of the true bed, but the painter's bed is a copy of a copy, an imitation of a
phantasm, and thus three steps removed from reality. Unlike the painter
of the Ion, Gorgias, and Protagoras, the painter of Republic 10 has no
useful knowledge, but by his mimetic abilities he is able to deceive others
into believing that he has. The painter's work is described with a flourish
which might have been borrowed from the hated sophist: "worthless,
cohabiting with worthless things, producing worthless offspring (4abA,

Apa ,ablX avyLYrvop~vfl 4,aDXa 'yevve , 603b).
Some of these passages contain clear and unambiguous references to
skiagraphia or skiagraphic techniques: 1, 8, 10, 11, 12. Negative attitudes
10 PHOENIX
toward painting ar
Plato's strongest an
in 4, 5, and 7 we fin
painter, for he is
painting as a craf
compares the fanta
imagery. One can
toward painting i
demn the painter
skiagraphia while o
pre-Phaedo dialog
or conventional (Po
morally acceptable
Two other points
between the poet/
of these passages d
poet to the painter
ate than that in Bo
poets are to be ba
the gods), and the
the painter who fa
on the other hand,
painter per se, rat
in Book 10 it is th
condemns him: it
Although the treat
necessary supplem
at the time when
two passages as ear
30Paul Friedlander, P
(New York 1967) 14-31
31R. E. Nettleship, Le
F. M. Cornford, The R
differed in Books 3 and
tion and in Book 10 h
or he may be operati
([above, note 30] 132-1
analogies with paintin
topic shows a degree o
judgment arbitrarily as
painter as vicious impo
he was expressing his
not carefully revise his
clear not only from his
I am convinced that co
intentioned scholarly e
The second point to be remarked is the

of the skiagraphic and non-skiagraphic
to Books 7-10 and the early part of Boo
Books 2.377e-6. Since the early part of
by some to be a later linking section be
dialogue,32 it is tempting to see these p
ness of the dangers of skiagraphic pain
sages which do not demonstrate such aw
pare them with the references to paint
as we shall see below.33 A major difficu
reference to skiagraphia in the Phaedo
Plato's attitude and awareness occurred
of the Republic, we shall be forced to d
to a point during the composition of th
just such an hypothesis has been propos
In 1961, Alberto Diaz Tejera analysed
the frequency of their use of terms whic
koine (Ionic and Ionic-poetic),34 basing
Plato's vocabulary would reflect the cha
he lived.35 Diaz found that this indeed
logues fell into definite groups in accor
such words. The chronological order of
from his evidence was basically the ort
an important exception being the R
statistical difference between Books 2-6.502 and Books 6.505-10. The
section 502-504, with its many cross references, he saw as an attempt to
connect the two parts.
Between the two segments, Books 2-6 and 7-10, Diaz placed another
32Nettleship (above, note 31) 47-66; Max Pohlenz, Aus Platos Werdezeit (Berlin
1913) 209; H. von Arnim, Platos 7ugenddialoge (Leipzig 1914) 73 ff.
33It has been suggested that the variety in attitude reflects the art scene current at the
dramatic date of the dialogue, rather than the situation current at the time of com-
position (Webster, "Greek Theories of Art and Literature Down to 400 B.C.," C 33
[1939] 166). However, the dialogue with the earliest dramatic date (the Parmenides)
clearly (and anachronistically) mentions skiagraphia, which seems to refute this sug-
gestion.
34Alberto Diaz Tejera, "Ensayo de un metodo lingiiistico para la cronologia de
Plat6n," Emerita 29 (1961) 241-286; "Die Chronologie der Dialoge Platons," Altertum
11 (1965) 79-83.
35The same method was used by U. Fleischer, Untersuchungen zu den pseudo-hippo-
kratischen Schriften (Berlin 1939) and by R. Andrados Francisco, Estudios sobre el
lixico de lasfdbulas es6picas (Salamanca 1948).
36Diaz's ordering of the dialogues is as follows (each group is also arranged in chrono-
logical order): Group 1: Meno, Protagoras, Gorgias, Republic 1; Group 2: Republic 2-6,
Cratylus, Symposium, Phaedo, Republic 7-10, Phaedrus, Theaetetus, Parmenides;
Group 3: Philebus, Sophist, Politicus, Timaeus, Critias, Laws.
12 PHOENIX
group of dialogue
consists of the Cr
suggests that Pla
(Book 1 being eve
interrupting his w
around 384, and re
sequence agrees wi
which deal with pa
The results of othe
this point. Lutosla
the Phaedo next be
than Books 2-10.38
that some work pr
time of writing th
Phaedo.39 Similarly
Republic 2-10, find
also many peculiar
there is great simi
of two editions.41
for the earlier par
that linguistic diff
as the Lysis and th
span. On the other
period after the Si
experience which c
ences between it an
THE PAINTER AFTER THE REPUBLIC
Both the Parmenides and the Theaetetus contain a si

painting. However, as we have seen, these passages are
for the information which they offer us about the nat
In the Theaetetus, Socrates says:
371t is interesting to note the often-suggested reference to the P
(6 Ppr X6'yos which proves that the soul is immortal), which mi

of support to the suggestion that the Phaedo had been written shor
interval between Books 2-6 and 7-10.
38W. Lutoslawski, Origin and Growth of Plato's Logic (London 1905) 264, 323-325.
38Ibid. 270.
4oVon Arnim, "Sprachliche Forschungen zur Chronologie der platonischen Dialoge,"
SBWien 169 (1911) 232.
4'Pohlenz (above, note 32) chapter 9; the theory was restated and defended more
recently by L. A. Post, "An Attempt to Reconstruct the First Edition of Plato's
Republic," CW 21 (1927) 41-44, but it is not generally accepted; see Auguste Dibs,
La Ripublique I-III (Paris 1932) cxxiv ff.; Paul Shorey, The Republic (London 1930) 2.
xvi, xxv; W. C. Greene, "The Paradoxes of the Republic," HSCP 63 (1958) 199-216.
Now really, Theaetetus, when I am near the st

painting, I can't understand it at all, although w
seemed to make some sense to me. (Tht. 208e)
The passage in the Parmenides is simil

It is just as in a shadow painting, in which th
and alike to someone standing far away, but,
appear to be many and varied, and, owing to th
colors appear changed and unlike themselves.
Painting appears in the Phaedrus in the

the written word, calling it an expedien
for reminder; a semblance (b6ta) of wis
the conceit of wisdom (Bo660o4os) r
creating only an image (sElwXov, 276a
in that both are mute (275d), and while
skiagraphia, the context is clearly the
and deception.
In the Sophist, Plato returns to the r
the sophist; however, the difference
earlier treatment of the subject is str
Gorgias the painter stood in contrast t
to be a person who possessed techne, h
the impostor and stands with the soph
Well, we know this about the man who claims
techne, that by producing imitations (tA.zjIptzar
by the painter's art, and by showing them from
able to persuade them that he is able to creat
expect that there will be another techne, invo
able to bewitch the ears of the young, who ar
things, displaying verbal phantoms (ElbwXa)
the truth and everything he says seems to be
In the sequel to this passage, Plato

mimesis. This is not his first analysis
another analysis in Republic 10 which
the two passages are interesting to com
divided into that which produces copie
copies at three removes from reality. C
the products of craftsmen such as the
at three removes are the works of the
the craftsmen. The former category ha
2Webster sees a commendation of the painte
imitation is the most skilled and pleasing of a
however, when these words are taken in contex
mendatory: such imitation deceives the innoce
14 PHOENIX
closer relationship
two parts: one pa

proportions of the
color to each part; t
the real proportio
This is the type of
works of colossal size:
For if they reproduced the true proportions of beautiful figures, you know that the upper
parts would look smaller than they should, and the lower parts larger, because the one is
seen from a distance and the other at close range. And so artists, abandoning the truth,
incorporate into their works not the true proportions but those which appear beautiful.
(Sophist 235e-236a)
The first type of mimesis is the art of creating likenesses (ELKIs), the
second type can create only appearances (4avrrcduara).43
Later in the Sophist, as the division is completed, the relationship
between the analyses of the Republic and the Sophist is made clear. The
Sophist makes a further division of the copies at three removes from
reality-some of these are true copies (likenesses) while others are in-
correct copies (appearances). The analysis in the Sophist is thus a further
refinement upon the analysis of the Republic. The emphasis in the
Sophist is on the right side of the division (appearances), and for the time
being no real interest is taken in the possibilities latent on the left side,
the category "likenesses." Nevertheless, the way seems to be opened to a
return of at least certain painters to favor, as a concept implicit in the
Cratylus (true painting) begins to be developed.
The Statesman contains two references to painting. The first is an
incidental analogy which nonetheless clearly expresses Plato's opinion
of painting. It is obvious that he does not subscribe to the saying that a
picture is worth a thousand words:
Our definition is rudimentary, like an outline sketch of a figure, which is sufficient to be
a likeness but has not yet received its full brilliance through the application of pigments
and the blending together of colors (77 a crvKprtcr T(WV XPWA'rwV). But a description of
a figure in words and discussion is more suitable, for those able to follow it, than a com-
pleted painting--although for those unable to follow such discussions, a drawing will
suffice. (Statesman 277c-d)
The second reference to painting in the Statesman occurs as part of a
4'Quintilian (Inst. 12.10.6) reports that Theon of Samos was noted for his depiction
of imaginary scenes, known as aavratfal. Pollitt interprets 4avra'ia here as "a very
lifelike appearance" ([above, note 13] 220 n. 2). Theon cannot be dated closely; Pollitt
considers him early Hellenistic, and he is associated by Quintilian with Pamphilus, who
may have influenced Plato as Steven suggests (above, note 3). Thus there is a possibility
that Plato's term kavr7arLK~i was borrowed from actual usage (as against G. S6rbom,
Mimesis and Art [Stockholm 1966] 158-159).
complex, sevenfold classification of th

painter is seen as a producer of obje
pleasure:
And then we would put in fifth place decoration and painting and whatever things are
used by them, and imitations produced by music, things created only for our pleasure
and rightly called by one name--playthings (raL'-yLov). This one name will suit them
all, for nothing serious can be attributed to them, but everything they involve is done
for the sake of play (raut&). (Statesman 288c-d)
In Republic 3 there is a similar classification of painting as one of the

luxurious arts (those which go beyond the needs of mere survival); yet
there Plato saw a useful purpose in painting: it imbues the soul with the
grace and harmony necessary for a good disposition (400e-401a). In the
Statesman, in contrast, painting is said to accomplish nothing useful.
Oddly, the classification of painting put into the mouths of Plato's
enemies, the materialists, at Laws 889d is almost the same as the classifi-
cation of the Statesman:
And finally art, last born of these, mortal offspring of mortal parents, bears certain
pastimes possessing little of truth, phantoms resembling the arts themselves, such as
those which painting produces, and music and all the arts which are fellow-workers with
these. Those of the arts which create something serious are those which join their power
with that of nature, such as medicine, and farming, and gymnastic. (Laws 889d)
In the Philebus there is a return to the hint given in the Sophist that
there may be a respectable form of painting. There is said to be a painter
in the soul who paints true pictures of true opinions and false pictures of
false opinions about pleasures and pains (39b-e). The powers of pleasure
to deceive are explained through a continuation of the analogy with
painting:
In the case of sight, looking at magnitudes from a distance or at very close range obscures
the truth and falsifies their appearance; wouldn't, then, the same thing happen in the
case of pains and pleasures? (Phlb. 41e-42a)
This recalls the earlier passages in the Republic in which Plato likened the
pleasures of the senses to shadow paintings (Resp. 583b, 586b), but there
is a difference between the two dialogues in this respect, for the Philebus
calls some pictures in the soul true pictures, allowing for the possibility
that some of the pictures painted by human painters might also be
"true" pictures, while this possibility is not mentioned in the Republic.
The Critias contains an interesting reference to skiagraphia which
suggests possible areas in which its use was especially marked:
We observe that in the case of earth, mountains, rivers, and woods, the whole sky and the
bodies revolving in it, we would be pleased if anyone were able to copy them with some
slight likeness; and, moreover, since we know nothing definite about such things, we
neither question nor find fault with the painting, but accept a vague and deceptive shadow
16 PHOENIX
painting (aKLaypaqLq
attempts to make a co
missing, because of co
anyone who does not
This description ca
bine realistically
impressionistic bac
story that Alcibia
coverer of skenogr
such techniques m
of the more elabor
used in wall painti
There are several
are introduced in o
passage, it is almo
the legislator's une
painter. It is only
of familiarity with
Athenian: You know th
involved in each figur
adroxpaiv rv), or what
embellishments, or to
becoming clearer or mo
Clinias: I've heard some
I'm not really acquain
Athenian: You're just as
clarify a point. Suppos
picture possible, and,
its excellence for all tim
to leave behind him some successor to restore his work when it suffered from the effects
of time-and a successor who was able to correct his own shortcomings in the work as
well? (Laws 769a-d)
In another passage, the painter, rather than being compared with the
44See note 17 above.
45A. M. G. Little, Roman Perspective Painting and the Ancient Stage (Kennebu
Maine 1971) 1-2. Steven also suggests that a connection may exist between the use
the term oKtraypa4la in Republic 356c and wall paintings, resting his conjecture up
the words 7rp6Ovpa Kat 7aX^ja which he thinks suggest illusionistic architecture (abov
note 3) 150. See also note 17 above.
46I have not discussed the color theory of the Timaeus (67c-68d), because its links
with earlier color theories, going back to Empedocles, rather than with the act
activities of painters, as Plato makes clear when he warns that anyone who tries to
his statements by putting them into practice is forgetting the difference between hum
and divine nature: God alone has the power to combine different things into one.
color theory, see Walter Kranz, "Die iltesten Farbenlehren der Griechen," Hermes
(1912) 126-140.
legislator, even in details, provides

which the legislator must correct:
For most of us, distant prospects confuse ou

the legislator fails to establish an opinion opp
that pleasure and justice are unrelated], and
somehow, by institutions and addresses and
are like shadow paintings: to the unjust man,
of his own injustice and iniquity, while the jus
just man, because of his own justice, the o
and the unjust unpleasant. (Laws 663b-c).
Both of these passages display an awar

niques which is absent from the passag
painter and legislator in Books 5 and
the Republic who sought to copy an
legislator, while the shadow painter
uneasy analogy, at worst, an enemy w
deceive them.
One reference to painting remains in the Laws (668b-669c). As one of
Plato's last statements upon the subject, it is appropriate that this
passage seems to offer a set of criteria which makes explicit what Plato
has hinted at a number of times in the later dialogues: that there is a
sort of painting which is morally acceptable, and which stands in opposi-
tion to the techniques of the shadow painter. These criteria apply to all
types of mimesis, but they are defined in terms of painting. They cover
only the first step in judgment, the stage in which the correctness of the
representation is to be evaluated. (This stage is to be followed by a purely
aesthetic judgment, but Plato does not go on to offer criteria for this
later judgment.) The criteria of correctness require that "all the members
of the body in their true and natural numbers and real situations" be
represented, "so disposed relatively to one another as to reproduce the
natural grouping." The same accuracy in representation must be main-
tained in portraying color and shape. All confusion is to be avoided
(Laws 668d-e). These criteria are framed in terms of Plato's rejection of
skiagraphia. When we look back, we see that they were implicit in
previous allusions to good or true pictures: the ELKCWV Of the Sophist is a
copy which conforms to the proportions of the original in all three dimen-
sions and gives the proper color to each part; the true painting in the soul
in the Philebus gives a correct representation of pleasure and pain, as
opposed to a distorted and deceptive picture.
CONCLUSIONS
Plato's references to painting do seem to fall into distinct gr

a major split between the pre-skiagraphic and the skiagraphic
18 PHOENIX
as Schweitzer sugg
Plato looked upon
respectable memb
techne (Ion, Gorg
passages reflect bot
illusionistic paintin
painter (Phaedo, R
a period in which
persists, but in wh
true painting whic
However, if one rec
to skiagraphic refe
seems that one is le
Despite the strong
exist, this does no
no one would mai
instant, and it seem
which the composi
have had experien
reflected in his wo
in his composition
Can anything be
influence which m
and attitude? In o
Schuhl, Steven, an
tion, two aspects o
the negative aspec
(Plato's allusions to
that this attack wa
case, how are we t
existed peacefully w
such vehemence? T
would be some grea
voice raised in oppo
istic painting, a vo
ous nature of ski
candidates: Schweit
introduction of Sic
suggests that the S
painting and as po
us the archaizing p
As far as Schuhl's
the actual existenc
simple reason that Plato himself does

He did look with favor on the stabi
but the art for which he hoped to att
not the art of the Greek past (or of
new art of his own definition (similar
poetry of the archaic age-Homer and
laws which enabled the rulers to mai
over millennia, rather than the con
itself. And Laws 656d-657b certainly d
way aware that Egyptian painting had
efforts at archaizing.
This leaves us with the diametrica
Schweitzer, and the choice is reduced
of the Sicyonian school. Were the
painters, as Schweitzer maintains, de
orientation of the school as reporte
of anti-illusionists who stressed line
his conclusion on the Sicyonians' repo
account? I suggest that the answer to
not in the direction in which Steven a
tent of Pliny's account cannot determ
look to Pliny's source in his accounts
has been identified by Sellars, in his
the history of art, as Xenocrates, a p
himself a partisan of the skiagraph
criteria for artistic achievement in t
skiagraphic painters, and it was he wh
the school of critics which valued p
painting (and this includes Plato) is p
Stories told about individual Sicyonia
in the problems of light and shado
carefully calculated to modulate the e
picture was viewed at a distance (Pl
duced other skiagraphic innovation
between light and shade by variations
white for highlights (Pliny, HN 35
probable that the Sicyonians were no
that they utilized the full range of i
are to look to them as providing th
illusionism, as Schweitzer does, it m
47In K. Jex-Blake and E. Sellars, The Elder

(London 1896) xxxi-xxxv, and commentary o
20 PHOENIX
new and extreme f

simply because they
What, then, of Pl
these too to some in
less likely. Plato's
dialogues, at least
nearly submerged b
In essence, what Pl
was a philosophical,
and not an aesthet
because the demand
mological rather th
reflected the ideas
that any existent s
In summary, I be
determined prima
position, rather th
tive response, his a
external influence,
the illusionist extr
light" when confro
critic, with his ow
dangers of "moder
the Platonic polemi
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS
481 should like to express my appreciation to Philip Ambrose, Jean Davison, Robin
Schlunk, and George Bryan for helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of
this paper.

Plato and The Painters

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Plato and The Painters

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Plato and The Painters

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Plato and the Painters

Author(s): Nancy Demand

R EMARKS ABOUT PAINTERS AND PAINTING are to be found throughout

PHOENIX, Vol. 29 (1975) 1.

work was known

contemporary schools of painting. Th

BEFORE THE REPUBLIC

Plato's earliest reference to painting occurs in the

13Webster, OCD2, s.v. "Polygnotus;" so also Lippold, "Polygnot

And when we have c

If we can assign nam

the Cratylus? There is no suggestion

That "virtue" which is based not on wisdom

What was this dangerous shadow p

(,0opdv Kai ar6Xppwat KLaS).19 Anot

color" (Kiaats, eko

Plato himself offers excellent clues to the nature of skiagraphia in t

In several other passages Plato refers to the incomprehensibility of such

The term "skiagraphia" itself suggests a predominant interest in th

Shirley Barlow has found indirect evidence of this interest in light in

reflects the interests of contemporary p

The technique of skiagraphia contin

21Shirley Barlow, The Imagery of Euripides (

THE PAINTER IN THE REPUBLIC

There are a number of references to painting in th

(5) 6.484c-d: Philosophers should rule. After all, Socra

Do those who are truly deprived of the kno

(12) 10.596e-602d: The painter is a deliberate deceiver, a wizard (602d).

cohabiting with worthless things, producing worthless offspring (4abA,

The second point to be remarked is the

THE PAINTER AFTER THE REPUBLIC

Both the Parmenides and the Theaetetus contain a si

(6 Ppr X6'yos which proves that the soul is immortal), which mi

Now really, Theaetetus, when I am near the st

The passage in the Parmenides is simil

Painting appears in the Phaedrus in the

In the sequel to this passage, Plato

two parts: one pa

The second reference to painting in the Statesman occurs as part of a

complex, sevenfold classification of th

In Republic 3 there is a similar classification of painting as one of the

legislator, even in details, provides

For most of us, distant prospects confuse ou

Both of these passages display an awar

Plato's references to painting do seem to fall into distinct gr

simple reason that Plato himself does

47In K. Jex-Blake and E. Sellars, The Elder

new and extreme f

You might also like