Physical Education and Health
Physical Education and Health
Physical Education and Health
Abstract
The study aimed at evaluating the level of volunteerism among National Service Training Program
(NSTP) students before and after taking NSTP courses, and identifying specific impacts of NSTP
towards volunteerism. Four scales and two focus-group discussion guides assessed the level of
volunteerism among students. Results reveal that the level of volunteerism among student-respondents
before the start of NSTP was high. Improvements in volunteerism were observed after comparing the
levels before and after taking the NSTP courses, which implicate that areas covered by NSTP may
actually develop perspective and empathy in students. Analysis of data from the NSTP Facilitators’
Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and interviews revealed an increased: 1) level of volunteerism spirit;
2) sense of personal effectives; and 3) awareness of the social issues after the course of NSTP. These
findings suggest that the study could serve as basis for planning and implementation of the NSTP
curriculum in order to sustain volunteerism spirit toward nation-building. It is recommended that
further longitudinal study on the effect of NSTP to volunteerism be done on a national scale.
Keywords:
Author’s Notes
Correspondences regarding this paper should be directed to Zhnina U. Custodio at email custodio.zu@pnu.edu.ph.
Nation-Building
In the LTS, the first course taken by the students The assumption set forth in this study is the
is NSTP 11 (Introduction to NSTP) which centers increase in volunteerism or motivation to volunteer
on the formation of one’s self. It gives students an after the students have undergone the NSTP-LTS.
in-depth information about their personalities and The paradigm shows that NSTP facilitates the
helps them improve their skills in dealing with improvement in volunteerism among students, which
others and helping different kinds of people who plays an integral role in nation-building (see Figure1).
are in need. Emphasis is placed on the application This reflects that NSTP is a catalyst to a nation of
of volunteerism and leadership to diverse human citizens with heightened civic consciousness who
endeavours. are working towards community improvement and
nation-building.
Students who passed the NSTP 11 are allowed
to enrol the second course, NSTP 12 (Community
Immersion). Students are assigned to different partner
communities or schools where they will be allowed to Methodology
observe first to gain insights on the current situation
and later on assess the need of the environment so Research Design
that appropriate literacy services could be provided.
The first module of NSTP 12 focuses on the nature of This study is an experimental research.
community service intended for the students to find Respondents were tested on the levels of volunteerism
the true meaning and nature of community service. from different perspectives (outcomes, motivation,
The second part of their training involves the actual helping attitude, and the capacity to be charitable) on
immersion into the community and identifying variety two occasions before the taking NSTP and after they
of techniques and strategies that can be used in group took the course. The design requires that students are
activities in the community. assumed to have equal characteristics at the start of the
NSTP courses in terms of their levels of volunteerism
Nation-building is about people. People who while differences among sections and with their pre-
make effort to build institutions and practices that test scores are assumed to be evident after taking the
allow people to govern themselves in peaceful and course.
prosperous ways. Nation-builders are those who take
initiative to develop the national community, through Participants
government programs that include the mandatory
NSTP subjects for tertiary education. These students Purposive sampling was used to cover all college
who immerse in communities are the change agents students currently enrolled in NSTP1 course subject,
and the driving force in the creation of a more first term SY 2015-2016 of the university. All students
transparent and democratic society. They help build enrolled were invited to participate and consented
the nation with the will and vision to accomplish to involvement in the survey. The total size sample
greatness through the spirit of volunteerism, not for comprised 360 college students, 282 female and 75
themselves, not for their immediate families, and male students with ages ranging from 16 to 18 years
friends, but for the progress of the nation. (mean = 17.5). Table 1 shows the distribution of
students across sections and year level.
Respondents’ Characteristics f %
Year and Section
I–7 36 10.0
I–8 32 8.9
I- 1 32 8.9
I-10 38 10.6
I-2 30 8.3
I-3 39 10.8
I-4 35 9.7
I-5 37 10.3
I-6 36 10.0
I-9 28 7.8
III-14A BECED 17 4.7
Total 360 100.0
Sex
Female 283 78.6
Male 75 20.8
Total 360 100.0
Ten first year sections comprising of 343 levels of volunteerism in the areas of:
students and one junior section with 17 students
of the university were selected to be part of the 1. Volunteering Outcomes which include
study. Table 1 presents the general profile of the 18 outcomes that can result from
respondents. volunteering and ask that respondents
their agreement or disagreement with
The third year students were selected because each outcome (http://www3.uakron.edu/
their curriculum is designed to take the NSTP course witt/rmfcs/booklet.pdf). A reliability
during their third year. Majority of the respondents analysis was undertaken with 150 college
(283 or 78.6%) were females while 75 or 20.8% students resulting to a reliability of a .916
were males with ages ranging from 16 to 18 years using Cronbach alpha;
(mean = 17.5).
2. Volunteer Functions Inventory is a 30-
Sampling was done by selecting all the first year item measure of motivations to volunteer.
sections taking NSTP 1 or the introductory course, The authors of the scale (Clary & Snyder,
which included one third year class during the first 1998) used a functionalist approach to
term, SY 2015-2016. All students in all sections were volunteering, examining the functional
chosen to be the participants. Consent forms were motives individuals have for choosing to
distributed during the orientation of the students for volunteer. The scale is divided into six
their NSTP course which were later returned with separate functional motives (i.e., factors):
signatures of their parents. 1.) Protective Motives – a way of protecting
the ego from the difficulties of life; 2.)
Intruments Values – a way to express one’s altruistic
and humanitarian values; 3.) Career – a
Four scales and two focus-group discussion way to improve career prospects; 4.)
guides were used in this study. The scales measure Social – a way to develop and strengthen
helping attitude; and (4) capacity to be charitable. to lessen their feelings of being lonely or isolated
These areas were repeatedly tested over the course of (protective factors) (M = 157.57; SD = 25.69). One
three months. In addition, a focus-group discussion can deduce, though, that the scores were largely
was held to gather information on the quality of different from one another as evidenced by the large
volunteerism developed among the students. The FGD standard deviation.
was also conducted among the students’ facilitators
and class leaders who were volunteer upper year level The students’ helping attitude at the start of the
students. Conduct of the FGD primarily focused on NSTP program was at a moderate level which primarily
assessing the impact of NSTP classes on the students means that the students may need to improve how
with regard to skills and community involvement. they view volunteerism as a personally rewarding act.
Their behaviors, beliefs, and feelings associated with
Data Analysis helping present a moderate construal of themselves in
relation to helping (M= 71.5; SD = 7.5). Lastly, the
The study used descriptive statistics in describing students were seen to be efficient in being charitable
the levels of volunteerism of the students at the start of towards others, which means they are prone to seeing
their NSTP. Analysis of variance was used to determine a just world (M = 70.10; SD = 10.78).
differences in sections as well as differences in their
pre-tests and post-tests mean scores. Scheffe was According to Clary and Snyder (1998), there are
used as a post-hoc test to determine where differences six different functions served by volunteerism, and
among sections lie. these are Values function, Understanding function,
Social function, Career function, Protective function,
and Enhancement function. In this study, the six
functions comprised the volunteerism scales shown
Results and Discussion in Tables 3 and 4. Results revealed that in general the
students viewed participating in activities as positive
Level of Volunteerism Among the Students Before and valuable. This is an imperative perspective
the Start of the NSTP because it can be inferred that students do not see
the NSTP courses as obligatory courses and perceive
Table 2 reveals that at the start of the NSTP the course activities as something that is beneficial
program, the students had varied levels of seeing the to them. Student-respondents showed a certain
outcomes of their volunteerism acts (M = 90.6; SD = degree of importance in doing volunteer work. They
15.36) but in general were high in being conscious of placed high importance in engaging into activities
what their volunteer acts may result into. Additionally, that promote helping and being of assistance to other
the volunteer functions inventory revealed that at people. They see their involvement as something they
the start of the NSTP course, students in general can learn from and attribute volunteering to enhance
were inclined to initially engage in volunteering acts their social circle.
Table 4. ANOVA Results of the Pre-Testing of the Scales among the Participants (N= 360)
Helping attitude, in this study, measures groups’ mean scores in the four scales. It may be
the respondents’ feeling, beliefs, and behaviors infered that the groups were equal at the start of
concerning their interaction with others. Student the NSTP courses and that an observed differences
exhibit efficiency in providing help to those in need. may be due to chance. It also means that while the
Items in the scale include items like people giving students demonstrated relatively moderate to high
money to organizations they can identify their cause volunteerism, the levels were not enough to establish
with. differences among sections.
Table 3 presents the correlations between and Assessment of Levels of Volunteerism after NSTP 11
among the selected scales. Results showed that all the
scales are correlated at .01 level of significance. Data from the post-tests of the participants
revealed that they had a high perception of the
Table 4 presents the comparisons of outcomes of their volunteering to different school
performances in the four (4) scales before the start of and community activities (M = 84.81; SD = 16.06)
the NSTP courses. The data show that no significant (see Table 5). The students perceived that they are
differences were observed between the different contributing to a greater cause by volunteering and that
their self-esteem increases as they volunteer in various students reported having positive feelings and attitude
academic and non-academic activities. With regards towards helping which may be influenced by the types
the Volunteer Functions Inventory data, initially, the of activities they experienced when they were taking
students were inclined to engage in volunteer acts the course.
because they would want to be with other people
and experience working in groups. However, in the Lastly, significant differences were observed
post-testing of the scale, the responses were inclined in the attitudes towards charitable giving, with a
to express students’ altruistic and humanitarian relatively higher efficiency to be charitable (t= 3.48; p
motivations (M = 148.83; SD = 27.42). Their helping <.05). This means that the students generally believed
attitude is still in the moderate classification. Lastly, that there is a just world and that people need to be
consistent with the pre-test results, the students helped because they deserve to be helped. The results
considered themselves efficient in charity giving (M = also revealed that there is a high level of interpersonal
68.84; SD = 7.01). trust among the students which may have been
cultivated in the atmosphere and environment provided
Comparing the levels prior to and after taking by the University.
the NSTP course reveal that improvements were seen
in volunteerism. Significant differences were observed Apparently, an evident difference was seen in the
in volunteering outcomes (t = 4.852, p < .01) which Volunteerism Functions Inventory (F = 3.107; df 10,
may be interpreted as students being less conscious 28, p>.01), which shows that priorities between classes
of the tangible benefits of volunteering and seeing the were somewhat different. As shown in Tables 6 and 7,
volunteering as a personal goal without thinking about the classes were inclined to become humanitarian and
the actual outcome. In addition, the students perceived altruistic; however, levels may be obviously varied in
that differences also existed in how volunteerism relation to the levels of their volunteerism functions.
functions. The shift from putting primary importance All the other tests did not show that differences existed
on gaining friends as a function of volunteerism to between classes after taking their NSTP courses.
perceiving it as a form of being more humane and Scheffe test revealed that differences in the sections
altruistic may implicate that the areas covered by the were primarily due to higher humanitarian scores of
NSTP course may actually develop perspective and two sections.
empathy (t =5.05; p < .01) (see Table 6).
The aforementioned data provides information
Interestingly, the students’ scores on helping on the NSTP classes in the university, that first, there
attitude was not significantly different (t = 1.35, is a high possibility that outcomes are high in relation
p <.01). This may be primarily due to the scope of to the development of the self. This means that through
what the scale is supposed to measure, specifically “volunteering” for different activities, students may
the interdependent construal which may be relatively have varied reasons in mind. However, the common
consistent and permanent over time. What is interesting reason is believing in the context of what helping is,
in the results from the helping attitude scale is that the self-enhancement, and seeing a just world.
Table 7. Differences Between Classes in the Four Scales Before and After the NSTP
Sum of df Mean Square F Sig.
Squares
Volunteerism Outcomes (Post) Between Groups 3439.739 10 343.974 1.354 .204
Within Groups 53106.243 209 254.097
Total 56545.982 219
Volunteerism Scale Functions
Between Groups 21021.639 10 2102.164 3.107 .001
Inventory (Post)
Within Groups 140749.767 208 676.682
Total 161771.406 218
Helping Attitude Scale (Post) Between Groups 547.560 10 54.756 1.515 .136
Within Groups 7446.109 206 36.146
Total 7993.668 216
Attitude towards Charitable
Between Groups 728.911 10 72.891 1.521 .134
Giving (Post)
Within Groups 9775.712 204 47.920
Total 10504.623 214
*significant @ .01
The results of the testing within a three-month to be involved in which were pointed out by the NSTP
period revealed noteworthy implications to the levels facilitators and volunteer students.
of volunteerism between and among students. When
it comes to certain factors concerning volunteerism, The three variables that increased after the
change was observed in seeing the outcomes of NSTP classes were areas highlighted and enhanced in
helping, motivation, and charitable giving while the course syllabus. These were also areas the students
students demonstrated the same perceptions when it have been encouraged to pay more attention to. A
comes to helping attitude. This increase have been review of the course syllabus of the NSTP classes
observed in various activities that the students chose provided information on the foci of the courses which
NSTP Outcomes f
Spirit of volunteerism 3
Nationalism 3
Socialization skills 2
Increase awareness in societal issues 2
Knowing one selves 1
Leadership 1
Teamwork 1
are to increase the tendency to provide assistance Specific Impact of the NSTP Component Towards
and the knowledge of sustainable development Volunteerism
and the importance of community-building. The
results further reveal that the increased scores after One of the highlighted questions in the FGD
the exposure to the various NSTP activities had is about the knowledge and skills gained by NSTP
a significant effect on how students perceive the students after attending the NSTP subjects.
outcomes of their volunteerism.
In the FGD conducted, the spirit of volunteerism
Analysis of the correlations between the pre- and nationalism among NSTP students are two
and post-test scores that there is an average 10% important themes mentioned by the NSTP Facilitators.
determination between the scores of the students According to them, they had observed that most of
when enrolled in NSTP classes. This may provide their NSTP students had increased motivation or spirit
insights as to how the delivery of NSTP classes can to do volunteer work.
further be improved to increase the likelihood that
volunteerism behaviors may increase. “As I read their reflections in their
journal, the spirit of volunteerism has
In measuring the impact of the NSTP to the been the biggest learning they got in the
students, the volunteer process model (Penner & NSTP.” (F, 17)
Finkelstein, 1998) was used. From this perspective,
antecedents and consequences of volunteering is “NSTP strengthens the perception of the
examined over time. The students’ prior experiences students on volunteerism. NSTP gives them
of involvement e.g. high school experiences may the idea on how to serve the nation.” (M,18)
have contributed to an increased and value-specific
perception of volunteerism. However, because of According to other NSTP facilitators, their
the changing circumstances due to the adjustment in students’ involvement in volunteerism work was more
college and their current experiences with the NSTP evident when they became involved in the projects
facilitators and student volunteers, their motivation of the community where they live. Moreover, they
to volunteer becomes higher which is evident in the mentioned that NSTP helps the students realize their
motivation, attitude and charitable giving scales. role in the society.
Further analysis showed that volunteerism may “As what I have observed, aside from being
have served different functions for students taking more nationalistic, their socialization skills
NSTP, while others saw it as value-laden, some also improved.” (M,17)
students perceived serving a protective function. In
general, positive feelings are enhanced by participating “There are many things that the students
in activities prompting volunteer-actions. learned from NSTP. Aside from gaining
knowledge during the sessions, students
learned the value of volunteerism, working
O’Bannon, F. (1999). Service-Learning Benefits Our Piliavin, J. A., & Callero, P. (1991). Giving blood:
Schools. State Education Leader, 17, 3. The development of an altruistic identity.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Omoto, A. M., & Snyder, M. (1990). Basic research in
action: Volunteerism and society’s response Rehberg, W. (2005). Altruistic individualists: Motiva-
to AIDS. Personality and Social Psychology tions for international volunteering among
Bulletin, 16, 152-166. young adults in Switzerland. Voluntas: Inter-
national Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit
Omoto, A., & Snyder, M. (1995). Sustained helping Organizations, 16(2), 109- 122.
without obligation: Motivation, longevity
of service, and perceived attitude change Scales, P., & Dale, B. (1997). Effects of service-
among AIDS volunteers. Journal of learning on youth: What we know and what
Personality and Social Psychology, 68, we need to know, Generator, Winter, 6-9.
671-687.
Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (1992). Who helps and
Omoto, A. M., Snyder, M., & Berghuis, J. P. why? The psychology of AIDS volunteerism.
(1993). The psychology of volunteerism: In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Helping
A conceptual analysis and a program and being helped: Naturalistic studies (pp.
of action research. In J. B. Pryor & G. 213-239). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Reeder (Eds.), The social psychology of
HIV infection (pp. 333-356). Hillsdale, NJ: Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism. Menlo
Erlbaum. Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
Penner, L. A., & Finkelstein, M. A. (1998, February). United Nations Volunteers. (2012) Volunteering
Disposition and structural determinants of in India: Contexts, Perspectives and
volunteerism. Journal of Personality and Discourses.
Social Psychology, 74(2), 525, 537.