AFP
AFP
AFP
AFP
AFP α1-fetoprotein
REF 04481798 190 100 tests • 2nd incubation: After addition of streptavidin-coated microparticles,
the complex becomes bound to the solid phase via interaction
• Indicates analyzers on which the kit can be used
of biotin and streptavidin.
MODULAR • The reaction mixture is aspirated into the measuring cell where the
Elecsys 2010 cobas e 411 cobas e 601 microparticles are magnetically captured onto the surface of the
ANALYTICS E170
electrode. Unbound substances are then removed with ProCell/ProCell M.
• • • • Application of a voltage to the electrode then induces chemiluminescent
emission which is measured by a photomultiplier.
• Results are determined via a calibration curve which is
English
instrument-specifically generated by 2-point calibration and a
Please note master curve provided via the reagent barcode.
The measured AFP value of a patient’s sample can vary depending on the a) Tris(2,2’-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II)-complex (Ru(bpy)2+
3 )
testing procedure used. The laboratory finding must therefore always contain a
statement on the AFP assay method used. AFP values determined on patient Reagents - working solutions
samples by different testing procedures cannot be directly compared with one M Streptavidin-coated microparticles (transparent cap), 1 bottle, 6.5 mL:
another and could be the cause of erroneous medical interpretations. Streptavidin-coated microparticles 0.72 mg/mL; preservative.
If there is a change in the AFP assay procedure used while monitoring therapy, R1 Anti-AFP-Ab~biotin (gray cap), 1 bottle, 10 mL:
then the AFP values obtained upon changing over to the new procedure Biotinylated monoclonal anti-AFP antibodies (mouse) 4.5 mg/L;
must be confirmed by parallel measurements with both methods. phosphate buffer 100 mmol/L, pH 6.0; preservative.
R2 Anti-AFP-Ab~Ru(bpy)2+ 3 (black cap), 1 bottle, 10 mL:
Intended use Monoclonal anti-AFP antibodies (mouse) labeled with
Immunoassay for the in vitro quantitative determination of α1-fetoprotein ruthenium complex 12.0 mg/L; phosphate buffer 100 mmol/L,
in human serum and plasma. pH 6.0; preservative.
The Elecsys AFP test is intended for the use as:
• An aid in the management of patients with non-seminomatous Precautions and warnings
germ cell tumors. For in vitro diagnostic use.
• As one component in combination with other parameters to evaluate Exercise the normal precautions required for handling all laboratory reagents.
the risk of trisomy 21 (Down syndrome). Further testing is required Disposal of all waste material should be in accordance with local guidelines.
for diagnosis of chromosomal aberrations. Safety data sheet available for professional user on request.
The electrochemiluminescence immunoassay “ECLIA” is intended for Avoid foam formation in all reagents and sample types (specimens,
use on Elecsys and cobas e immunoassay analyzers. calibrators, and controls).
AFP
AFP α1-fetoprotein
Expected values MODULAR ANALYTICS E170 and cobas e 601 analyzers
Results of following studies using the Elecsys AFP assay see below: Repeatability Intermediate precision
a) Multicenter study “Elecsys 2010 analyzer” status September Sample Mean SD CV Mean SD CV
1997 and reference range study in Germany and France, data IU/mL ng/mL IU/mL ng/mL % IU/mL ng/mL IU/mL ng/mL %
evaluated in September 1998. HS 1 14.8 17.8 0.27 0.33 1.8 14.1 17.0 0.53 0.64 3.8
Following AFP values were found in serum samples from HS 2 46.7 56.5 0.65 0.79 1.4 44.6 53.9 1.14 1.38 2.6
646 healthy test subjects: HS 3 745 901 11.7 14.2 1.6 711 860 23.4 28.3 3.3
≤ 5.8 IU/mL or ≤ 7.0 ng/mL for 95 % of the results.
PC TM1 9.35 11.3 0.21 0.25 2.2 9.1 11.0 0.26 0.31 2.8
AFP median values for completed weeks of pregnancy (defined as completed
weeks of pregnancy beginning with the start of the last menstruation phase): PC TM2 104 126 2.49 3.01 2.4 103 125 2.54 3.07 2.5
b) Multicenter study to determine reference values for evaluating the risk of Passing/Bablok20 Linear regression
trisomy 21 in maternal serum (study No. BO1P019, status March 2003). y = 0.92x - 1.51 y = 0.90x + 0.35
Values from serum samples of 1753 pregnant women in total (relevant τ = 0.975 r = 0.998
gestational weeks 14 to 18) were evaluated. The sample concentrations were between approx. 2 and
Measurements with the Elecsys HCG+β assay and the Elecsys AFP assay 500 IU/mL (2.4 and 600 ng/mL).
were conducted in 5 clinical centers in Belgium, France, and Germany.
The gestational age in days determined by ultrasound was given for each References
sample. From a log-linear regression analysis of all 1753 AFP values 1. Taketa K. Alpha-Fetoprotein in the 1990s. In: Sell SS. Serological cancer
versus gestational age the following median values were calculated for markers. Humana Press 1992;31-46, ISBN: 0-89603-209-4.
the middle of the respective weeks (e.g. week 14 + 3 days): 2. Ruoslathi E, Engvall E, Kessler MJ. Chemical Properties
Weeks 14 15 16 17 18 of Alpha-Fetoprotein. In: Herberman RB, McIntire KR (eds).
IU/mL 20.9 24.0 27.6 31.7 36.4 Immunodiagnosis of Cancer. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc 1979:101-117.
ng/mL 25.3 29.0 33.3 38.3 44.0 3. Ramsey WH, Wu GY. Hepatocellular carcinoma: update on diagnosis
and treatment. Dig-Dis 1995;13,2:81-91.
Note: For prenatal testing it is recommended that the median values be 4. Sato Y, Nakata K, Kato Y, et al. Early recognition of hepatocellular
re-evaluated periodically (1 to 3 years) and whenever methodology changes. carcinoma based on altered profiles of alpha-fetoprotein. New
The transferability of the reference values to plasma samples Engl J Med 1993;328,25:1802-1806.
has not been verified. 5. Klepp O. Serum tumor markers in testicular and extragonadal germ cell
Each laboratory should investigate the transferability of the expected values to malignancies. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 1991;206:28-41.
its own patient population and if necessary determine its own reference ranges. 6. Sturgeon C. Practice Guidelines for Tumor Marker Use in the
Clinic. Clin Chem 2002;48(8):1151-1159.
Specific performance data 7. Stuart KE, Anand AJ, Jenkins RL. Hepatocellular Carcinoma in
Representative performance data on the analyzers are given below. the United States. Cancer 1996;77,11:2217-2222.
Results obtained in individual laboratories may differ. 8. Brewer JA, Tank ES. Yolk sac tumors and alpha-fetoprotein in
first year of life. Urology 1993;42,1:79-80.
Precision
9. Wald NJ, Kennard A, Densem JW, et al. Antenatal maternal
Precision was determined using Elecsys reagents, pooled human
serum screening for Down’s syndrome: results of a demonstration
sera, and controls in accordance with a modified protocol (EP5-A) of
project. BMJ 1992;305:391-394.
the CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute): 6 times daily
10. Canick JA, Saller DN Jr. Maternal serum screening for aneuploidy and
for 10 days (n = 60); repeatability on MODULAR ANALYTICS E170
open fetal defects. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1993;20,3:443-454.
analyzer, n = 21. The following results were obtained:
11. Bendon RW. The anatomic basis of maternal serum screening.
Elecsys 2010 and cobas e 411 analyzers Ann Clin Lab Sci 1991;(21)1:36-39.
Repeatabilityb Intermediate precision 12. Schlebusch H. Prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome. In: Thomas L
Sample Median SD CV SD CV (ed.). Clinical Laboratory Diagnosis, TH-Books, Frankfurt, 1st English
IU/mL ng/mL IU/mL ng/mL % IU/mL ng/mL % edition 1998:1124-1125, deutsche Auflage 1998:1149-1150.
13. Cuckle HS, Wald NJ, Thompson SG. Estimating a woman’s risk of having
HSc 1 12.8 15.5 0.26 0.31 2.0 0.39 0.47 3.1
a pregnancy associated with Down’s syndrome using her age and serum
HS 2 42.6 51.5 0.63 0.76 1.5 1.02 1.24 2.4 alpha-fetoprotein level. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987;94:387-402.
HS 3 566 685 11.2 13.5 2.0 15.6 18.9 2.8 14. Reynolds TM, Penney MD. The mathematical basis of multivariate risk
PC TMd1 8.01 9.69 0.22 0.27 2.8 0.28 0.33 3.4 screening: with special reference to screening for Down’s syndrome
PC TM2 86.8 105 1.92 2.33 2.2 2.33 2.82 2.7 associated pregnancy. Ann Clin Biochem 1989;26:452-458.
b) Repeatability = within-run precision 15. Cuckle HS, Wald NJ, Nanchahal K, et al. Repeat maternal serum
c) HS = human serum alpha-fetoprotein testing in antenatal screening programmes for Down’s
d) PC TM = PreciControl Tumor Marker
syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96:52-60.
16. Dunstan FDJ, Gray JC, Nix ABJ, et al. Detection rates and false
positive rates for Down’s Syndrome screening: How precisely
can they be Estimated and what factors influence their value?
Statistics Medicine 1997;16:1481-1495.
17. Lamson SH, Hook B. Comparison of Mathematical Models for
the Maternal Age Dependence of Down’s Syndrome Rates.
Hum Genet Vol 1981;59:232-234.
18. Cuckle HS. Improved parameters for risk estimation in Down’s
syndrome screening. Prenat Diagn 1995;15:1057-1065.
COBAS, COBAS E, ELECSYS, ENZYMUN-TEST and MODULAR are trademarks of Roche. INTRALIPID is a
trademark of Fresenius Kabi AB. Other brand or product names are trademarks of their respective holders.
Significant additions or changes are indicated by a change bar in the margin. Changes to reagent barcode
test parameters which have already been read in should be edited manually.
© 2011, Roche Diagnostics
0123
Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Sandhofer Strasse 116, D-68305 Mannheim
www.roche.com