We are IntechOpen,

the world’s leading publisher of

Open Access books
Built by scientists, for scientists

4,200
Open access books available
116,000
International authors and editors
125M
Downloads

Our authors are among the

154
Countries delivered to
TOP 1%
most cited scientists
12.2%
Contributors from top 500 universities

Selection of our books indexed in the Book Citation Index

in Web of Science™ Core Collection (BKCI)

Interested in publishing with us?

Contact book.department@intechopen.com
Numbers displayed above are based on latest data collected.
For more information visit www.intechopen.com
Chapter

Utilization of Cotton Spinning

Mill Wastes in Yarn Production
Tuba Bedez Ute, Pinar Celik
and Memik Bunyamin Uzumcu

Abstract

Efficient use of natural resources and utilization of recoverable wastes are

getting more and more important day by day since recovering wastes have both
economic and environmental benefits. As the source material costs constitute the
majority of the yarn production costs, decreasing raw material costs provide con-
siderable advantages for spinners. From the point of textile manufacturing, various
production wastes can be reused in textile industry. In each step, from ginning (for
cotton fibers) to end product formation, recyclable/recoverable waste materials are
generated. However, mainly polyester products are recycled (r-PET) and used again
in textile industry by 100% or in blends with other man-made or natural fibers.
Compared to research on r-PET, recovered cotton fibers inspired interest recently.
The main objective of this study is to fill the gap in the literature via investigating
the properties of the yarns produced with recovered cotton wastes, generated in
different sources. For this purpose, spinning mill waste types were selected. In this
experimental study, different waste types (card waste, blowroom waste, and fabric
waste) and blending ratios were used. As a conclusion, the effect of waste type and
blend ratio on the physical and mechanical properties of the yarns and the fabrics,
produced with virgin and waste cotton fibers, were analyzed.

Keywords: waste, recovering, recycling, spinning mill, fiber, cotton

1. Introduction

Every being in this world has an expiration date, even the world itself possibly
has one. This situation is the same for man-made products too. We produce them,
use them, and try to find a way to get rid of them, when the time comes. One of the
hardest questions of today comes to mind at this point: How will we manage the
resultant waste of the products we created? Should we dump the waste to proper
waste yards and reuse or recycle them? The answers to these questions are crucial.
Scientists, governments, and local authorities work for finding answers to these
questions. Wastes can be a problem for local authorities because of their environ-
mental effects.
There are different categories of wastes. According to Australian Waste Report
2016, these categories are masonry materials (asphalt, bricks, rubble, etc.), metals
(steel, aluminum, etc.), organics (food, garden organics, etc.), paper and cardboard
(liquid paperboard, magazines, etc.), plastics (PET, HDPE, PP, etc.), glass, hazard-
ous wastes, fly ash, and other wastes (including textiles and leather) [1]. Some

1
Textile Industry and Environment

of these waste types can be recycled and utilized as raw materials in same type of
products they belong in or in different products.
Textile wastes can be divided into two main groups: production wastes and
postproduction wastes. Production wastes are basically raw materials of each
production step which cannot be put into end product due to different reasons.
For yarn spinners, these wastes can occur during cleaning of the fibers or combing
out short-staple fibers from the long ones in combing machine, etc. These clean/
unclean wastes in fiber form or not can be reused. After spinning mill, there are
wastes in yarn and fabric forms, and they need recycling to be put again in produc-
tion. Postproduction wastes are generally worn out cloths, which can be recycled
and may be used again in textiles or utilized in other products.
Textiles include different raw material (fiber) types. Fibers used in textiles are
categorized into two main groups, which are natural and man-made fibers. Most
known examples for natural fibers are cotton (seed fibers), wool, silk (animal
fibers), flax (bast fibers), sisal (leaf fibers), and asbestos (mineral fibers). On the
other hand, polyester, nylon, acrylic (which are synthetic fibers), modal, viscose
rayon, and acetate rayon (which are regenerated fibers) are some of the examples
for man-made fibers [2]. Thereby, textile wastes have a great variety of raw material
sources. These wastes can be recycled or reused in different products. In 2017, global
fiber production exceeded 100 million mt. Polyester has around 51% of total global
fiber production. The second most important fiber is cotton, and it has approxi-
mately 25% of total global fiber production [3].
Textile wastes can be recycled/reused in textiles or other products. Other
product wastes can also be utilized in textile production. One of the most known
examples for this is PET bottles. PET bottles are collected, are recycled, and can be
used in textile products as “r-PET fiber.” r-PET fibers can be used in yarn produc-
tion, as 100% or in blends, thereby in most of the textile structures. There are vari-
ous studies about this topic. These studies cover spinning of the fiber, properties
of the fiber [4], properties of yarn, and fabric produced from this fiber and all [5].
Some of the researches are focused on using textile wastes in different products.
Mishra et al. used textile wastes to produce composites and tested the properties of
these composites [6]. Briga-Sa, Binici, and El Wazna used textile wastes as insula-
tion materials, and Briga-Sa indicated that they got results similar to polystyrene
(XPS) and mineral wool [7–9]. Shukla used PET fiber wastes to synthesize new
chemicals which can be used in different fields [10]. These examples show that
textiles are generally sustainable materials. There are too many studies dedicated on
this topic.
Liquid waste and solid waste are generated during the production of textiles.
Especially agriculture of cotton fiber, which is the subject of this study, and the
evaluation of the solid wastes that occur during yarn spinning are important for
sustainability and environment. These topics are really important for the future,
considering the increasing world population and decreasing agricultural areas.
Moreover, large amounts of water are consumed; pesticides and synthetic fertil-
izers are used during cotton growing. Especially pesticides have negative effects on
human health. The recycling/reusing of wastes occurring at every stage of textile
production will be positive in terms of reducing the environmental effects putting
them again in the production chain. Consumers are also becoming more conscious
about these effects and they seek environmentally friendly “green products” [11].
This should be considered by the producers.
Due to increasing fiber production, the amount of pre-consumer and postcon-
sumer textile wastes is increasing. According to a study Pinheiro and de Francisco
conducted with Brazilian clothing manufacturers, 167,850 kg of cotton was
consumed with these manufacturers, and 19,086 kg of cotton waste occurred in

2
Utilization of Cotton Spinning Mill Wastes in Yarn Production
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85127

their productions. This means 11% of the raw material was left out as waste [12].
Moreover, as the amount of textile solid waste increases, the evaluation of these
wastes becomes more important. Therefore, the terms of sustainability and circular
economy issues come to the forefront in textile industry. This chapter is focused
on spinning mill wastes of textile wastes. Information about how textile wastes
occur in spinning mills and utilization of them in textiles are given. For this reason,
informations about spinning mill and wastes occurring in spinning mill were given,
initially.

1.1 Short-staple yarn spinning

Spinning is defined by Barker as the “art of throwing a number of more or less

short fibres together in such a way that, being drawn out to form a comparatively fine
filament” [13]. In this process, one of the main defining parameter is fiber length.
According to fiber length, machinery and their adjustments that should be used are
determined. In textile yarn manufacturing, two main systems are used depending
on fiber length: short-staple and long-staple spinning systems. In principle, fibers
up to 60 mm in length are spun in short-staple spinning systems, and fibers with
lengths over 60 mm are spun in long-staple systems. Short-staple fibers are gener-
ally processed dry using mechanical means, and the spinning systems used for this
types of fibers are also known as cotton spinning system [14].
From the field, seed cotton moves to gins for separation of lint and seed. This
is the first step in which cotton wastes occurred. Cotton gin wastes consist of
sticks, leaves, burs, soil particles, mote, cotton lint, and other plant materials
[15]. These wastes can be used in different areas such as chemical industry (e.g.,
soaps), livestock industry (e.g., animal feed), or food industry (e.g., cotton seed
oil).
After harvest and ginning, cotton fibers are compressed and bales are formed.
For this reason, the first step in a cotton spinning mill is opening. This process is
needed in order to clean effectively and form slivers in which individual fibers are
oriented very closely to sliver axis [16]. Most of the opening and cleaning is carried
out in blowroom machinery. However, card has an important role in opening and
cleaning. Most of spinning mill wastes occur in these machinery.
Parallelization is carried out subsequent to opening and cleaning processes.
It is really important to force fibers to place as parallel to each other as possible in
sliver to spin a good quality yarn. Machine mainly responsible for this process is
draw frame which also takes care of attenuation and doubling of slivers. Fibrous
waste amount of these machines is lower compared to the rest of the spinning mill
machinery.
To produce some cotton end products especially in which fine yarns are used,
yarns with better properties are needed. One of the ways to do so is to remove some
fibers that are much shorter than the mean of the distribution from slivers [16]. This
process is carried out with combing machine. In Figure 1, spinning machinery line
with combing machine is given. Cotton fibers longer than 27 mm are generally used
after combing up to 13% which is sufficient for good quality yarns [16]. This means
waste ratio of this process is high.
During roving and spinning (for ring spinning), some fibers cannot enter
yarn or roving body, and fiber fly is formed. These fibers are sucked by pneumatic
systems that are placed after delivery rollers, and they are collected in the machine.
Moreover, if end breaks happen in yarn or roving, the same system collects flowing
fibers after leaving delivery rollers till operator’s intervention. In open-end rotor
spinning systems wastes can occur in opening rollers which also are responsible for
cleaning.

3
Textile Industry and Environment

Figure 1.
Opening and cleaning lines of combed ring spinning [17, 18].

1.2 Cotton wastes in spinning mill

Klein classified cotton fibers used in short-staple spinning as virgin fiber (from
ginning mill), clean waste, comber waste, recycled fibers from dirty waste, and
fibers torn out of hard waste (roving, yarn, and twisted threads) [19]. Spinning
wastes and their sources are given in Figure 2.
Broken ends of sliver, lap, web, and filter strippings from draw frame, roving
frame, ring spinning frame, and rotor spinning frame are known as clean waste,
having more than 95% of good fiber. Comber and roving wastes’ good fiber ratio
is around 95–97%. Wastes generated in blowroom machines, and cards are dirty
wastes with 35–55% good fiber ratio. Besides, another dirty waste, flat and filter
stripping waste, has a higher amount of good fiber (65–80%). As the waste fibers
are processed in different number of machines and therefore stressed fibers, their
good fiber content is less than virgin fibers. For this reason, spinners prefer to feed
the waste fibers into normal spinning process, in a controlled manner, with a con-
stant percentage in order to avoid quality variations. Generally, wastes arising in the
mills can be returned to the same blend from which they arose; comber wastes are
mostly used in rotor spinning. In carded ring-spun yarn and fine rotor-spun yarn
production, waste fibers can be used, up to 5%, but for combed yarns, waste fiber
ratio can be lower, up to 2.5%. Higher waste fiber amounts can be used for medium
and coarser rotor yarns, about 10 and 20%, respectively.

Figure 2.
Spinning mill wastes in different sources.

4
Utilization of Cotton Spinning Mill Wastes in Yarn Production
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85127

According to Klein, waste generation in spinning mills of industrialized coun-

tries differs from machine to machine. The waste mostly occurs in comb machine,
as one of its primary functions is to remove short fibers which are called comber
wastes. Lowest waste creating machine in the spinning mill is draw frame. If the
spinner is producing carded yarns, blowroom is responsible for the most waste gen-
eration. However, in blowroom machinery and card, shorter fibers have the highest
ratio in the resultant waste despite ring spinning frame. In ring spinning frame and
comber, waste consist of longer fibers (up to 1 1/2″) in comparison with card and
blowroom machinery [20].
As the raw material costs constitute the majority of yarn production costs,
spinners prefer to use waste fibers in the blends. In addition to saving raw material
costs and the requirement for efficient use of limited raw material resources, the
possibility of using higher degree of cleaning in the blowroom machines is the other
advantage. On average, about 6–8% primary waste which is composed of 50% good
fiber can be expected. About 90% of the good fiber elimination can be recovered as
secondary raw material that is still containing 6% trash.
Many researches focused on cotton spinning wastes. Wulfhorst concluded that
these secondary raw materials can be blended with raw materials with a percentage
up to 20%, without noticeable changes in yarn quality [21].
Duru and Babaarslan have determined an optimum opening roller speed for
spinning different types of 60/40 polyester/waste blended rotor yarns. Waste fibers
were obtained from cotton noil, recycled fibers, flat waste, etc. and were blended
and processed on the traditional short-staple (carding) system. They have found
that yarn strength, unevenness, and hairiness values decreased with the increase of
the opening roller speed, and the optimum opening roller speed was 7000 rpm for
both yarn properties and cleaning effects [22].
The effect of some rotor spinning parameters, such as rotor diameter, rotor speed,
separator angle, navel type, opening roller speed, and yarn linear density on the level
of yarn hairiness of the rotor-spun yarn produced from ginning wastes in different
waste proportions, was investigated by Hasani et al. by the Taguchi method. They
have found that, for 35/65 cotton waste-spun yarns, rotor diameter was the most
effective factor, followed by yarn linear density, separator angle, opener speed, navel
type, and rotor speed factors, respectively. Yarn linear density was the strongest
effect for 50/50 cotton waste-spun yarns, and it was followed by rotor diameter, rotor
speed, opener speed, navel type, and separator angle factors. Rotor speed and opener
speed were found the least effective factors of all, for 65/35 cotton waste-spun yarns
[23]. According to their following research, the rotor diameter, yarn linear density,
and the navel type had the largest, and the opening roller speed had the lowest effect
on yarn hairiness, for all waste ratios. Furthermore, they have found that yarns
produced with higher waste proportions had higher hairiness values [24].
Khan and Rahman have focused on the effects of rotor spinning parameters
too. They have studied the effects of rotor speed, combing-roll speed, and type
of recycled waste on rotor yarn quality and end breakage, using response surface
methodology. They have collected spinning wastes from different positions of ring
spinning process (flat strips, noil, filter waste, and Pneumafil) and used after recy-
cling, except Pneumafil. They have reported that yarn strength, elongation, imper-
fections, and end breakage rate can be improved by using Pneumafil waste, mostly
in the range of 5–25%. The negative impacts of rotor speed on yarn imperfections
and end breakage can be minimized also. In their study, rotor and combing-roll
speed of 85,000 rpm gave better results in terms of yarn strength and elongation;
on the other hand, the lowest end breakage rates were found at lower speeds [25].
Khan et al. have also focused on predicting the unevenness, imperfections,
strength, and elongation properties of cotton/waste blended rotor yarn, using

5
Textile Industry and Environment

Taguchi OA experimental design. They have used blend ratios, blending technique,
cylinder speed, and rotor speed as predictors. They have collected flat strips from
carding machines and recycled them. Besides, comber noils, untwisted roving
wastes, and Pneumafil wastes were directly used. They have produced virgin
cotton/spinning waste blended yarns with two different levels of blend proportion
(17/83 and 33/67) for both blowroom blending and draw frame blending. Their
model showed that blend ratio and rotor speed are the most influencing factors
for yarn quality. Reducing rotor speed improved the yarn evenness, imperfections,
and strength. Yarn strength was found lower with draw frame blending, but on the
other hand with this blending type, high portion waste containing yarns’ evenness,
imperfection, and elongation values are better than blowroom blending [26].
Halimi et al. investigated the effect of waste ratio (0, 12.5, 25, 37.5, 50, 62.5, 75,
and 100%) and spinning parameters (rotor type, rotor speed, and opening roller
speed) on the rotor yarn quality. Cotton wastes were collected from opening-
cleaning machines and cards processed to reduce impurities. Greek cotton was
chosen due to the suitable fiber length for blending with recovered fibers. They have
reported that yarn appearance, level of irregularity, and the yarn uniformity did not
affect up to 25% waste ratio [17, 18].
Celep et al. investigated the thermal comfort properties of the single jersey
fabrics produced from virgin/recycled cotton fiber-blended open-end rotor yarns
(100/0, 50/50, and 0/100). Recycled cotton fibers were obtained from fabric scraps
from garment industry. They have found that fabrics containing recycled cotton
fibers show higher thermal resistance and lower thermal conductivity, thermal
absorptivity, and air permeability and give a warmer feeling at first touch [27].
Recycled denim fabrics by using recycled cotton fibers (varying from 30 to 85%
blend ratio), recycled PES fibers, Tencel fibers, and virgin cotton fibers were pro-
duced. They have found that recycled fiber-blended yarns have higher unevenness,
IPI faults, and hairiness comparing to the standard yarns, resulting with noticeable
nubs in fabric surface. This case did not affect fabrics’ physical and mechanical
properties significantly but provides better abrasion resistance contrary to expecta-
tions from recycled products [28].
Yılmaz et al. have focused on the effects of different waste cotton fiber types
and the amount of waste in the blends (varying from 5 to 40%), on the quality of
conventional ring and OE-rotor yarns. They have used preparation process wastes
(blowroom and carding) and Pneumafil wastes (sucked on the draw frame, roving
frame, and conventional ring spinning machines). They have found both for con-
ventional ring-spun and OE-rotor yarns that the blends containing pneumafil wastes
resulted with better yarn properties, while the blends with blowroom and flat wastes
caused worse yarn qualities. In general, flat waste fiber blends have higher neps and
hairiness values. They have concluded that when the waste percentage was increased
from 5 to 40%, yarn irregularity values increased up to 37 and 16%, yarn hairiness
increased by about 21–22%, yarn tenacity values decreased by 22, and 52%, breaking
elongation decreased by 7 and 38%, for ring-spun and rotor yarns, respectively. As
expected, with the usage of waste fiber, the most deteriorated yarn properties were
yarn unevenness in conventional ring-spun yarns and tensile properties in rotor
yarns. Their findings showed that the effect of waste fiber usage on knitted fabrics’
pilling behavior was significant and Pneumafil fiber blends increased the pilling
resistance, while for other waste fiber blends, on the contrary [29].
Béchir et al. evaluated the effect of recycled fiber ratio and number of recycling
passages on the yarn quality and predicted the quality of the blend using a math-
ematical approach. They have concluded that recycling process of cotton waste with
four passages gave an optimal global quality of fibers. Unevenness and IPI values of
blended yarns increased with the increasing of recycled fiber ratio in the yarn [30].

6
Utilization of Cotton Spinning Mill Wastes in Yarn Production
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85127

Demiroz Gun et al. studied the dimensional and physical properties of the socks
made from the blend of reclaimed fiber and polyester fiber. As a result of the study,
they reported that reclaimed fiber can be used for production of socks, when the
blend of virgin polyester fiber and reclaimed fiber are used, and thus acceptable
quality can be obtained [31].
Yuksekkaya et al. used “yarn quality index” value, which was defined by Yunus
and Rahman (as Yarn Quality Index = (Strength × Elongation)/ Evenness), for
evaluating yarn quality in their study [32, 33]. It can be said that the most important
parameter in order to evaluate yarn spinnability is the yarn tensile strength. They
reported that generally, yarns produced from recycled fibers displayed better prop-
erties in terms of unevenness, yarn imperfections, and yarn quality index value. On
the other hand, they found that yarn tensile strength and fabric burst strength were
lower for recycled yarns and fabrics when compared to virgin ones [32].

2. Material and methods

The main objective of this study is filling the gap in the literature via investigat-
ing the properties of the yarns produced with cotton wastes, generated in different
sources. For this purpose, different waste types (card waste, blowroom waste, sliver
waste, and recycled cotton fiber from ecru fabric waste) and waste ratios (10/90,
30/70, and 50/50) were used in rotor spinning. As a pre-treatment and recycling
process, all waste types were processes in Micro Dust and Trash Analyzer (MDTA) in
two passages. Simultaneously, trash and fiber content of these wastes were analyzed,
and the fiber length specifications of wastes after recycling process were evaluated by
length control tester (Textechno). Length control tester is a mobile device for use in the
spinning mill, developed for the measurement of fiber length parameters on slivers or
cotton in tuft form. The test results of length control tester give information about the
mechanical stresses which the fibers undergo in the manufacturing process and opti-
mum settings of card, draw frame, or combing machines [34]. Besides, fiber contents
of the wastes were analyzed with MDTA, and test results are given in Table 1. Trash
analysis of the virgin cotton was performed from sliver form, resulting with high ratio
of fiber content. Subsequently, wastes were blended with virgin cotton fibers (in sliver
form) with the same machine. Then, Ne 20/1 open-end yarns were spun by using these
slivers on Rieter open-end machine (R40). Single jersey fabrics were knitted by using
Mesdan Lab Knitter with the same tightness factors under constant machine settings.

Waste type Fiber 2,5% SL* 50% SL ML* Fiber SFL* SFA* SFC* (AFIS Staple
content (HVI) (mm) (AFIS) hooks (mm) (%) short fiber gradient
(%) (upper (LCT (%) amount) (HVI
length) length) (%) uniformity
(mm) (mm) ratio)

Blowroom 45.74 25.27 9.24 15.62 5.3 7.26 56.4 38.0 38.4

Card 82.44 21.69 6.71 7.79 1.2 2.81 78.0 76.6 33.0
Sliver 82.11 27.63 11.62 11.04 0.4 11.04 44.5 15.0 42.0

Fabric 80.89 22.64 8.46 13.36 8.4 6.07 57.2 47.6 39.6

Virgin 99.41 27.67 12.50 20.59 4.8 10.38 42.5 17.4 42.5
cotton
*is corresponding to the test result given in brackets.

Table 1.
Fiber specifications.

7
Textile Industry and Environment

The standards of yarn and fabric tests applied were given below:

• Bursting strength (EC 37 hydraulic bursting strength tester) TS 393

EN ISO 13938-1

• Air permeability (Textest FX 3300) TS 391 EN-ISO 9237, ASTM D737

• Pilling test (ICI Pilling Box-7000 tours) TS EN ISO 12945-1

• Fabric thickness (SDL Digital Thickness Gauge) TS 7128 EN ISO 5084

• Yarn strength test (Lloyd yarn strength tester) TS 245 EN ISO 262,
ASTM D 2256

• Yarn evenness test (Uster Tester 5) ISO 16549

The effect of waste type and blend ratio on the physical and mechanical proper-
ties of the yarns and the fabrics, produced with virgin/waste cotton fibers, were
statistically analyzed by using SPSS.

3. Results and discussions

According to the results given in Table 1, the sliver waste and virgin cotton
fibers have similar fiber specifications, because of being a clean waste as mentioned
previously.
Physical and mechanical properties of the yarns were tested, and the test results
were given in Table 2. In addition, the fabric thickness, bursting strength, air
permeability, and pilling values of the fabrics were tested, and the test results were

Waste type Waste/virgin Uster Thin Thick Nep Yarn

cotton (CV%) places places values hairiness
(−50%) (+50%) (+280%) (H)
Blowroom 10/90 16.88 9.17 106.67 105.00 5.53

30/70 17.95 361.67 245.83 412.50 5.76

50/50 19.47 18.33 385.00 383.33 6.15

Card 10/90 16.53 5.83 50.00 23.33 5.84

30/70 16.64 10.00 75.00 59.17 6.37

50/50 15.48 4.17 78.33 62.50 6.82

Sliver 10/90 15.81 16.67 22.50 8.33 5.24

30/70 15.68 28.33 27.50 11.67 5.14

50/50 16.94 29.17 26.67 6.67 5.05

Fabric 10/90 16.30 5.00 75.83 40.00 5.58

30/70 16.27 1828.33 186.67 1077.50 5.86

50/50 16.26 52.50 209.17 125.00 6.04

Virgin 0/100 15.26 8.00 26.00 6.00 5.32

cotton

Table 2.
Yarn test results.

8
Utilization of Cotton Spinning Mill Wastes in Yarn Production
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85127

Waste type Waste/virgin cotton Fabric thickness (mm) Air permeability (l/m2/s) *Pilling (1–5)

Blowroom 10/90 0.78 1440 2–3

30/70 0.75 1274.8 3–4
50/50 0.78 1282 3
Card 10/90 0.78 1444 5
30/70 0.76 1412 5
50/50 0.79 1256 5
Sliver 10/90 0.76 1758 4
30/70 0.75 1830 4–5
50/50 0.73 2052 4
Fabric 10/90 0.76 1552 4
30/70 0.82 1410 3–4
50/50 0.78 1534 3
Virgin 0/100 0.67 2786 4–5
cotton
*1, worst–5, best.

Table 3.
Fabric test results.

given in Table 3. For better understanding and evaluation, yarn tenacity and burst-
ing strength values of different samples are given in Figure 3, respectively.
The effects of waste amount and waste type on yarn and fabric properties were
statistically analyzed (Table 4). The effects of waste amount on yarn and fabric
properties were found statistically significant, except yarn unevenness values.
According to the Student-Newman-Keuls test, the number of thick places and nep
values of the yarns produced with blowroom wastes were statistically significantly
highest, of all. In terms of yarn hairiness, the highest values belong to the yarns
produced with card waste, for all blend ratios. Card waste has the highest short fiber
amount, resulting with the yarns’ hairiness. For higher waste ratios (50/50), clean
sliver waste containing yarns show better yarn tenacity, close to 100% virgin cotton.
One of the main factors affecting measured fabric properties is yarn hairiness.
Yarn hairiness increases, and bursting strength decrease with the increase of waste
ratio, except when the waste type is sliver. Sliver waste/virgin cotton-blended yarns
have the lowest yarn hairiness values and highest bursting strength, even better
than virgin cotton, because of better fiber specifications.

Figure 3.
Yarn tenacity and bursting strength values of different samples.

9
Textile Industry and Environment

Significance (p) Significance (p)

Waste/virgin cotton ratio Cotton waste type

10/90 30/70 50/50 Blowroom Card Sliver Fabric

Yarn evenness (CV%) 0.541 0.541 0.541 0.160 0.478 0.806 0.998
Thin (−50%) 0.008* 0.008* 0.008* 0.117 0.460 0.838 0.086

Thick places (+50%) 0.000* 0.000* 0.000* 0.001* 0.087 0.700 0.005*

Nep values (+280%) 0.000* 0.000* 0.000* 0.034* 0.011* 0.780 0.120

Yarn hairiness (H) 0.000* 0.000* 0.000* 0.000* 0.000* 0.001* 0.001*
Yarn tenacity (cN/tex) 0.874 0.020* 0.002* 0.028* 0.000* 0.788 0.009*

Elongation at break (%) 0.013* 0.001* 0.321 0.026* 0.225 0.331 0.042*

Fabric thickness (mm) 0.000* 0.000* 0.000* 0.063 0.383 0.488 0.039*
Bursting strength (kPa) 0.014* 0.237 0.030* 0.035* 0.021* 0.194 0.029*

Air permeability (l/m2/s) 0.000* 0.000* 0.000* 0.014* 0.200 0.001* 0.472
*
Significant for α = 0.05.

Table 4.
The results of variance analysis of the effects of different waste types and waste ratio on yarn and fabric
properties.

Fabric pilling values show that blowroom and fabric wastes containing fabrics
have more pilling. Fabrics produced with card waste have a lower pilling degree and
higher short fiber content but lower short fiber length. Probably, short fibers are too
short to compose a pill in card waste.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the waste of yarn spinning mill and recycled cotton fiber from
fabric waste were blended different blending ratios (10, 30, and 50%) with virgin
cotton fiber. Ne 20/1 cotton open-end yarns were produced from these blends. The
yarn physical properties of these yarns were tested. The effects of waste ratio and
waste type on yarn properties were investigated. According to the test results, the
dirty waste (blowroom waste and card waste) used in this study showed a different
tendency from the clean waste (sliver waste and fabric waste fiber). The blowroom
and card waste occurred during the cleaning of the fibers. They contain too much
short fibers and vegetable matters. Especially, card waste contains the shortest
fibers used in this study. For this reason, the yarn hairiness values are greater than
the others. Besides, the yarn tenacity containing 50% card waste was lower than the
others. However, in case of the use of blowroom waste, the number of thick places
and the number of nep were found greater than the others. On the other hand, the
content of the blowroom waste in the yarns has not influenced the yarn properties
except for thick places and nep values up to ratio of 30%. When fibers recycled
from the fabric have been used, it has been seen that the results are similar to those
obtained when using the blowroom waste.
Fabric thickness, bursting strength, air permeability, and pilling values of
fabrics were tested. When the results are examined, the use of blowroom waste
up to 30% in the fabric has not affected the bursting strength adversely. However,
when the ratio increased to 50%, the bursting strength decreased. When card waste
was used, the values of bursting strength decreased as the waste rate increased. For
the bursting strength values, it can be said that it is possible to blend up to 50% of

10
Utilization of Cotton Spinning Mill Wastes in Yarn Production
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85127

the cotton fibers recycled from fabrics. Depending on the yarn hairiness values, the
air permeability values of fabrics decreased as the ratio of waste fibers increased,
except for the sliver waste.
Today, the recovery of waste and its use in specific proportions within the yarn
blend is increasing day by day. According to the results of this study, it can be said
that the blowroom waste and the fiber recycled from the fabric gave similar results
and that the use of the wastes up to 50% did not affect the yarn and fabric proper-
ties adversely. It caused greater results in terms of only thick places and nep values
than the other ones. On the other hand, card waste can be used in yarn blends up to
30%, depending on the high short fiber content they contain. Sliver wastes showed
similar results compared to 100% virgin cotton fibers, as they are already clean
wastes.
According to test results of the pilling values of fabrics, the best values were
obtained when the card waste is used. On the other hand, the card waste has the
highest short fibers content. It is thought that the short fibers are easily removed
from the fabric surface after forming the pills in the fabric by itself and thus do not
cause deterioration in appearance.

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by a project (Project no: 15-TKAUM-002) from Ege

University Textile and Apparel Research and Application Center.
Photos of wastes and machines in Figure 2 were taken by the authors in a
Turkish spinning mill.

Author details

Tuba Bedez Ute1, Pınar Celik1* and Memik Bunyamin Uzumcu2

1 Department of Textile Engineering, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey

2 Department of Textile Engineering, Bartın University, Bartin, Turkey

*Address all correspondence to: pinar.celik@ege.edu.tr

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms
of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.

11
Textile Industry and Environment

References

[1] Pickin J, Randell P. Australian [9] El Wazna M, El Fatihi M, El

National Waste Report 2016. Bouari A, et al. Thermo physical
Victoria, Australia: Department of characterization of sustainable
the Environment and Energy & Blue insulation materials made from textile
Environment Pty Ltd.; 2017 waste. Journal of Building Engineering.
2017;12:196-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.
[2] Murthy HVS. Introduction to Textile jobe.2017.06.008
Fibers. New Delhi, India: Woodhead
Publishing India Pvt. Ltd; 2016. 238 p [10] Shukla SR, Harad AM, Jawale LS.
Recycling of waste PET into useful
[3] Preferred Fiber; Materials Market textile auxiliaries. Waste Management.
Report 2018. 2018. Available from: 2008;28:51-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.
http://textileexchange.org/wp-content/ wasman.2006.11.002
uploads/2018/11/2018-Preferred-Fiber-
Materials-Market-Report.pdf [Accessed: [11] Karthik T, Gopalakrishnan D.
June 30, 2019] Environmental analysis of textile
value chain: An overview. In: Muthu
[4] Gurudatt K, De P, Rakshit AK, et al. SS, editor. Roadmap to Sustainable
Spinning fibers from poly(ethylene Textiles and Clothing. Singapore:
terephthalate) bottle-grade waste. Springer; 2014. pp. 153-188. DOI:
Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 10.1007/978-981-287-110-7_6
2003;90:3536-3545. DOI: 10.1002/
app.12969 [12] Pinheiro E, de Francisco A.
Management and characterization of
[5] Telli A, Babaarslan O. Usage of textile solid waste in a local productive
recycled cotton and polyester fibers arrangement. Fibres & Textiles in
for sustainable staple yarn technology. Eastern Europe. 2016;24:8-13. DOI:
Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon. 2017;27:224-233. 10.5604/12303666.1201128
WOS: 000419066000003
[13] Barker AF. Handbook of Textiles.
[6] Mishra R, Behera BK, Militky Delhi: Abhishek Publications;
J. 3D woven green composites 2009. 369 p
from textile waste: Mechanical
performance. Journal of the Textile [14] Lord PR. Handbook of Yarn
Institute. 2014;105:460-466. DOI: Production. Cambridge, England:
10.1080/00405000.2013.820865 Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2003.
493 p
[7] Briga-Sá A, Nascimento D, Teixeira
N, et al. Textile waste as an alternative [15] Agblevor FA, Cundiff JS, Mingle C,
thermal insulation building material et al. Storage and characterization of
solution. Construction and Building cotton gin waste for ethanol production.
Materials. 2013;38:155-160. DOI: Resources, Conservation and Recycling.
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.037 2006;46:198-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.
resconrec.2005.07.002
[8] Binici H, Eken M, Dolaz M, et al.
An environmentally friendly thermal [16] Lawrence CA. Fundamentals of
insulation material from sunflower Spun Yarn Tehnology. Vol. 509. CRC
stalk, textile waste and stubble fibres. Press; 2003
Construction and Building Materials.
2014;51:24-33. DOI: 10.1016/j. [17] Halimi MT, Ben HM, Azzouz
conbuildmat.2013.10.038 B, et al. Effect of cotton waste

12
Utilization of Cotton Spinning Mill Wastes in Yarn Production
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85127

and spinning parameters on rotor surface methodology. IOSR Journal

yarn quality. Journal of the Textile of Polymer and Textile Engineering.
Institute. 2007;98:437-442. DOI: 2015;2:2348-2181
10.1080/00405000701547649
[26] Khan KR, Hossain MM, Sarker RC.
[18] Halimi MT, Azzouz B, Ben Statistical analyses and predicting the
Hassen M, et al. Influence of spinning properties of cotton / waste blended
parameters and recovered fibers open-end rotor yarn using Taguchi OA
from cotton waste on the uniformity design. International Journal of Textile
and hairiness of rotor spun yarn. Research. 2015;4:27-35. DOI: 10.5923/j.
Journal of Engineered Fibers textile.20150402.01
and Fabrics. 2009;4:36-44. DOI:
10.1177/155892500900400304 [27] Celep G, Doğan G, Yüksekkaya
ME, et al. Geri Dönüşümlü Lifler
[19] Klein W, Stalder H. A Practical İçeren Süprem Kumaşların Isıl Konfor
Guide to Opening and Carding. Textile Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi. Düzce
Institute; 1987. 60 p Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi.
2016;4:104-112
[20] Klein W. Blowroom and Carding,
The Rieter Manual of Spinning. Vol. 2. [28] Telli A, Babaarslan O.
Rieter Machine Works Ltd; 2014. 87 p Commercialized denim fabric
production with post-industrial
[21] Wulfhorst B. Technological
and post-consumer wastes. Tekstil
and Economic-Aspects for The ve Konfeksiyon. 2016;26:213-220.
Waste Processing in Modern WOS:000386121800013
Cotton Spinning Plants. Melliand
Textilberichte International Textile [29] Yilmaz D, Yelkovan S, Tirak Y.
Reports. 1984;65:730. WOS: Comparison of the effects of different
A1984TR92800013 cotton fibre wastes on different
yarn types. Fibres & Textiles in
[22] Duru PN, Babaarslan O.
Eastern Europe. 2017;25:19-30. DOI:
Determining an optimum opening
10.5604/01.3001.0010.2340
roller speed for spinning polyester/
waste blend rotor yarns. Textile
[30] Béchir W, Béchir A, Mohamed
Research Journal. 2003;73:907-911. DOI:
BH. Industrial cotton waste: Recycling,
10.1177/004051750307301010
reclaimed fiber behavior and quality
[23] Hasani H, Semnani D, Tabatabaei prediction of its blend. Tekstil
S. Determining the optimum spinning ve Konfeksiyon. 2018;28:14-20.
conditions to produce the rotor yarns WOS:000440377600002
from cotton wastes. Industria Textilă.
2010;61(6):259-264 [31] Gun AD, Akturk HN, Macit AS,
et al. Dimensional and physical
[24] Hasani H, Tabatabaei SA. properties of socks made from
Optimizing spinning variables to reduce reclaimed fibre. Journal of the Textile
the hairiness of rotor yarns produced Institute; 2014;105:1108-1117. DOI:
from waste fibres collected from the 10.1080/00405000.2013.876152
ginning process. Fibres & Textiles in
Eastern Europe. 2011;86:21-25 [32] Yuksekkaya ME, Celep G, Dogan
G, et al. A comparative study of
[25] Khan MKR, Rahman H. Study of physical properties of yarns and fabrics
effect of rotor speed, combing-roll produced from virgin and recycled
speed and type of recycled waste on fibers. Journal of Engineered Fibers and
rotor yarn quality using response Fabrics. 2016;68:68-76

13
Textile Industry and Environment

[33] Yunus M, Rahman F. Micronaire

effects. Textile Asia. 1990;13:58-61

[34] LENGTHCONTROL Fibre Length

Tester. 2019. Available from: https://
www.inteszt.hu/products/attachments/
lengthcontrolpdf_qTHSvBouDR.pdf
[Accessed: February 05, 2019]

14