Project Report
Project Report
Project Report
NO
1 INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE 2
2 MAJOR PLAYERS 7
4 TEXTILE EXPORT 14
6 SUPPLY CHAIN 19
PROJECT REPORT ON
SCNERIO OF TEXTILE
INDUSTRY IN INDIA WITH
SPECIAL FOCUS ON
TIRPUR
INDEX
INTRODUCTION
The textile industry, which is the single largest industry in India and
accounts for 31.1 per cent of the total value of exports, is not able to
meet its full potential because of fragmentation of the industry and
the use of obsolete and old technologies. This erosion of
competitiveness has been overcome by a few players and groups by
organising themselves along modern lines.
TEXTILE INDUSTRY
INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE
Mill Sector
There are 1850 mills in the country of which 284 are composite mills
(where the whole cycle of production from yarn manufacture, to
processing to fabric production takes place) and 1438 spinning mills.
The installed capacity is 37 million spindles, 450,000 rotors and
1,40,000 looms.
There are approximately 1200 medium and large scale textile units in
the mill sector and 20 per cent of these mills are located in
Coimbatore (Tamil Nadu).
Handloom Sector
Spinning Capacity
Currently, India has the second highest spindleage in the world, after
China, accounting for about 20 per cent of the world spindleage and 3
per cent of the world rotorage. The total capacity in the country in
terms of spindle equivalent is about 37 million as against 46 million in
China. However, in terms of quality and technology, only about 15
million spindles can be considered to be state-of-the-art, while
another 10-11 million spindles need upgradation within the next 5-7
years
Weaving Capacity
Textile Mills
Capacity Installed
Production of Fibers
Production of Yarn
Fabric Production
Imports Million US
$ 952 765 824 840 1052
Wadias: The Wadias own The Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., their
flagship company, with 5 units covering spinning, weaving and
processing, with production exceeding 300,000 meters of fabrics per
day and a turnover of approximately U.S. $ 90 million. The company
which pioneered the export of textiles in 1940 has a unique India-
wide distribution network of over 550 exclusive franchised retail
shops covering more than 300 towns. In fact, Bombay Dyeing is one
of India’s foremost brands producing sheets, towels, furnishings,
suitings, shirtings and is among the country’s foremost producers of
cotton, synthetic fabrics and readymades.
Birlas: The Aditya Birla group which is India’s third largest industrial
house has a major textiles operation, with its flagship company,
Indian Rayons Ltd. producing a range of products from viscose
filament yarn and flax yarns to worsted yarn and fire fighting
hosepipes. In fact, the Aditya Birla group is the world’s largest
producer of viscose staple fibre. It is also in the garments business
with Madura Garments in India being a leader in the branded apparel
market in India
The Aditya Birla group also has textiles mills overseas in Thailand,
the Philippines and Indonesia.
The Lalbhais: The Arvind Mills Ltd. is the flagship company of the
U.S. $ 550 million Lalbhai group. It is one of the top ten
manufacturers of denim in the world. The group companies include
Arvind Products Ltd., Arvind Worldwide (M) Inc, Mauritius, Arvind
Worldwide Inc, U.S.A., Arvind Clothing Ltd. ( which has a collaboration
with Cluett International Ltd. of the U.S.), Arvind Fashions Ltd. ( which
has a tie-up with VF Corporation of the U.S.A), and Arvind Overseas
(Mauritius) Ltd., Mauritius.
Parikhs: The Ashima Group owned by C.N. Parikh with its flagship
company, Ashima Ltd. is one of India’s leading 100 per cent cotton
fabric manufacturers. The Ashima Group turnover is U.S. $ 153
million. It has a marketing arrangement with Cone of the U.S.A. With
an annual capacity of 65 million metres of woven and circular knitted
cotton fabrics and on account of its qualitative supremacy it
commands a base of discerning customers in more than 45 countries
around the world. Its products include denim, suiting, shirtings,
interlining fabrics and circular knitted grey fabrics.
COMMODITY DEVELOPMENTS IN INDUSTRY
Today, the Indian cotton textile industry is large with over 1566
spinning units, over 284 composite mills and around 1.54 million
registered looms.The industry’s installed capacity includes over 33.93
million ring spindles and around 317 thousand OE rotors. This large
installation coupled with wide varieties of locally available cotton
enables the industry to produce yarn to match any specification and
count range.
Synthetic fabrics are made in the mill sector, handloom sector and
power loom sector. The powerloom sector accounts for about 98 per
cent of synthetic fibre fabrics in the country. The handloom sector
accounts for a share of 1.9 per cent, The mill sector accounts for 0.1
per cent.
Silk Production
India produces 14,000 tonnes of raw silk and imports 3,000 tonnes of
the raw material. Present production of silk fabrics is 190 million
metres. India ranks second among the mulberry silk producing
countries, accounting for 16% of the total world raw silk production.
There are about 182,000 silk handlooms and 27,000 silk powerlooms
in India. Indian silk fabrics, mainly saree materials are produced in
places such as Kancheepuram, Kumbakonam and Arni in Tamil Nadu,
Mysore and Bangalore in Karnataka., Dharmavaram and Pochampalli
in Andhra Pradesh, Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh and Murshidabad in
West Bengal. About 80 per cent of silk powerlooms are located in
Karnataka alone.
The constant search for variety and exclusivity in the global haute
couture markets gives an edge to Indian products, with their variety
of silks.
Woollen Industry
India is the 10th largest exporter of textiles and clothing in the world
and exported U.S. $ 11.31 billion worth of these two items in 2001-
2002.
The ready to wear revolution did not usher in a retail revolution. The
multi-brand stores which sold all types of products were the prime
distribution channel for clothing. The early 90s saw the setting up of
solo shops focussed on one brand and in this context the pioneering
efforts of Madura Garments and Zodiac helped the evolution of
fashion retailing.
During the mid 70’s and mid 80’s a silent revolution was also taking
place in women’s sartorial preferences. These periods witnessed an
unprecedented growth in the ladies outer wear/inner wear markets.
The growth in what is termed as Pujabi suits, or Salwar Khameez
sector was up by leaps and bounds.
Thus the garment industry in India has been evolving over the years.
In this process, its profile has undergone considerable changes.
Technology has been gradually upgraded and there is a qualitative
improvement in the garments produced in the country. Many leading
fashion labels are now associated with Indian products.
India has also been exporting garments for a number of years and
now in the last few years has established a distinct presence in the
world clothing market. From a country traditionally known to be
producing low cost products, its is now slowly also being increasingly
looked upon as a major supplier of high quality fashion garments.
Indian garments have now reached all the leading markets in Europe,
North America, the Nordic countries, Australia and Japan.
In the domestic sector, there is also the entry of foreign brands, most
of them in tie-us with Indian textile houses. Indus Clothing and Arvind
Mills/ Arvind Fashions are outstanding examples, the former with Lee
Cooper and the latter with V.F. Corporation of U.S.A. for Lee jeans and
with Arrow of U.S.A. for shirts.
For knitted garments too, the supply chain is through merchants. The
merchants give the manufacturers the specifications and they
manufacture and hand over their products to the merchants for sale.
For many years, the textile industry has been one of India’s most
closely regulated sectors. This is because the industry provides
livelihoods for very many households. The major raw material
consumed by the industry is cotton, and almost all of this is
domestically grown. Also, most of India’s cotton crop is consumed
domestically. The whole of the cotton-growing community is
therefore heavily dependent on the country’s textile industry. In
addition, there are many small-scale producers in the handloom
sector—each hand-operated loom produces around 5-6 meters per
day—and in hand processing (dyeing and finishing) who derive their
livelihood from the textile industry. The future of industry regulation
is a highly contentious issue. On the one hand, there are pressures to
adapt to the new world dynamics. But on the other, there are calls for
social benefits to be granted to the masses that are dependent on
this sector. Seldom is a middle path found. As a result, sectors fight
among themselves rather than collaborating to promote and enhance
India’s competitive advantages. For the industry to thrive, ways and
means of coordinating efforts need to be found.
Lack of Organised Retail Sector
The final user of the bulk of the textile chain’s products is the
consumer. Each component in the textile supply chain should
therefore aim to maximize the consumer’s satisfaction. However, the
system in India is not well adapted to that end. The system is “push”
driven by the industry rather than being “pull” driven, by consumers
and retailers. A chain like this suffers from the following problems.
Retailers, as the members of the chain who are closest to consumers,
have the greatest influence on what consumers purchase. However,
retailers in India also represent the most fragmented sector. They are
seldom aware of improvements in styling, packaging and product
features, and of worldwide developments. Even those who are aware
of such developments are too small to be able to influence their
suppliers, and to persuade them to make extensive changes or
introduce innovation. The least fragmented sector—and the one
which probably also has the most “clout”—is the spinning sector.
However, this sector is distanced from the consumer. Having always
been a commodity player, the spinning sector is production driven
and has little appreciation of innovative marketing. Because the front
(or retail) end of the chain is small and the back end comparatively
large and better organised, the result is an inefficient “push” system
with a high build-up of inventories at each stage in the chain and a
high level of mark-downs (products whose prices have been reduced
in order to clear surplus stocks).
Retailing in India
In fact, fashion is now driving the retail boom in India and brands in
clothing, textiles, are among the segments that lent the necessary
push to get the retail activities to get some organized formats. Textile
mill showrooms, Khadi Bhawans and BATA outlets across the nation
were in fact the first phase of structuring retail businesses.
Low unit values can be partly attributed to the fact that the garment
sector until recently has been undemanding as far as quality is
concerned. Since there is little perceived need for high quality
fabrics, there has been little demand for them. Also, Indian garment
makers use mainly low value fabrics produced by the power loom
sector, or stock lots sold off by the mills after the best qualities have
been exported. Even garments destined for export are, typically, low
value products.
Investment in fabric
Demand Stimulation
The spinning sector has, perhaps, the most modern equipment. But
even in this sector, around 65% of capacity is more than ten years
old. Out of a total of 33.3 mn ring spindles, it is estimated that 5 mn
have been rendered completely useless by poor maintenance and
made obsolete by changes in technology. Another 5 mn spindles are
very old and suffer from extremely low productivity.
So far the initial capital sum has been set at about US$ 6 bn for the
period April 1, 1999, to March 31, 2004-although the government is
prepared to increase this amount. However, the initial take-up of
funds has been low because of rigid conditions imposed by the banks.
This could slow down the industry’s modernisation.
The Government has also taken steps to improve the quality of raw
materials, mainly cotton by launching the Technology Mission on
Cotton in order to improve production, the productivity and quality of
cotton in an integrated manner. This covers all aspects of cotton
development from research to transfer of technology to farmers,
improvement of marketing infrastructure, and improvement of the
processing of cotton. This involves development of high yielding
varieties, technology transfer through demonstration and training,
modernization and technological Upgradation of ginning and pressing
factories and streamlining marketing infrastructure.
Human Resource Development
While at the top end of the industry there are technical institutes like
the Indian Institutes of Technology and other such institutes which
offer postgraduate, undergraduate and diploma courses in textile
technology, there are not many opportunities for training in the
decentralized sectors of weaving, knitting, processing and
manufacture of low cost garments..
Many of the key players in the organised mill sector realise this, and
some are pursuing major initiatives in order to build up supply
relationships with some of their buyers. These relationships take the
form of either joint ventures or marketing/sourcing arrangements.
In the mill sector, where most enterprises have only yarn and fabric
manufacturing operations, a number of players are looking to
increase their added value by becoming more involved in
downstream manufacturing operations. For example, many firms are
now keen to arrange for the supply of finished apparel products to
retail buyers in accordance with those buyers’ specific requirements.
Although most of these mills do not have garment making operations,
they are adding value to their own products by coordinating their
operations with those in downstream sectors. This move is evident in
the case of exports as well as domestic sales.
VISION
Endowed as the Indian Textile Industry is with multifaceted
advantages, it shall be the policy of the Government to develop a
strong and vibrant industry that can
• Produce cloth of good quality at acceptable prices to meet the
growing needs of the people;
• Technological upgradation
• Enhancement of Productivity
• Quality Consciousness
• Product Diversification
• Financing arrangements
• Re-design and revamp, during the 10th Five Year Plan, the
Schemes and Programmes initiated in the handloom,
sericulture, handicrafts and jute sector to ensure better returns
for those belonging to the disadvantaged categories, and the
North East and other backward regions of the country;
Many textile firms in India still continue to serve, profitably the lower
end of the market. As a result, these firms have not graduated to
producing and serving the higher value added market segment and
they have not made efforts to introduce better products at the same
cost to replace the low quality offerings. While there exist islands of
excellence in firms like Arvind or Coats or Bombay Dyeing, in many
plants enhancement of productivity is limited.
Studies show that there is low investment in Indian firms and most of
the investments in the textile industry in India in recent times have
been in spinning units. However, 65 percent of the spinning
machinery is still more than 10 years old the picture in weaving and
dyeing and finishing processes in much worse. China invested in
68,000 shuttles-less looms between 1987-1996 as compared to 8,000
in India or 30,000 in Indonesia or 81,000 in Korea.
Most firms also do not follow any scientific approach to shop floor
planning and control, thereby leading to poor co-ordination between
processes. Again, most quality control problems stem from weak
quality measurement and control systems. Improving quality
practices at ginneries should be one of the most crucial items on the
agenda of the Indian textile industry.
The second issue is that decisions on product mix choice and product
markets are very local and short-term oriented which result in short-
term gain at the cost of long-term effectiveness.
There are several areas where the Indian textile industry needs
assistance from abroad. The first area is that of textile machinery,
where better machines with better specifications are needed. Better
weaving machines, knitting machines and processing machines are
needed since India does not have an indigenous manufacturing base
for textile machinery and has to be dependent on imports from
abroad.
The third area where India needs assistance is in the area of systems
or actual methods of manufacturing. The experience of
manufacturers abroad, who have a higher productivity rate, needs to
be shared with the Indian industry. This includes quality monitoring,
manufacturing methods and work practices.
Background
Till 1924 Tirupur was not known for its knitting factories. The cotton
hosiery industry first made its appearance in India in 1893 in Calcutta
and after the first world war more cotton, woollen, synthetic hosiery
units came into existence in Bengal, Ludhiana, Mumbai, Kerala and
Madras province. The first banian factory in Tirupur was started in
1925. With the advent of electricity in Tirupur in 1931 more knitting
and weaving factories came into existence. Initially, all the knitting
machines were imported from Germany, Japan and New York. By
1942, there were 34 hosiery factories in Tirupur. After the second
world war, thanks to financial assistance from the banks, availability
of relatively cheap labour, hosiery yarn and electric power, more
factories came into existence in Tirupur. Today Tirupur has become
an important and active cluster of the knitwear industry in India.
For over 30 years, until the early 60’s the hosiery industry in Tirupur
was producing mainly grey and bleached banians. It was in the late
60s that the industry slowly diversified towards manufacture of other
inner garments.
The strength of the hosiery industry in Tirupur in 1961 was 200 units.
In the 70s, export of small quantities of banians and other inner
garments were made from Tirupur. Early in the 80's export of
knitwear, mainly basic T-shirts were made in small quantities. Exports
of other knitwear items gained momentum after 1985.
In the late 80's the knitwear industry diversified very quickly and took
up manufacture and export of other outer garments, viz, cardigans,
jerseys, pullovers, ladies blouses, dresses and skirts, trousers,
nightwear, sportswear etc.
Industrial Structure
In the past few years, however, over 200 units have taken up to
modernisation of their production processes with fresh investments.
About 800 new knitting machines have been imported from abroad.
According to the UNIDO report, soft flowing dyeing machines,
compacting machines for minimising residual shrinkage, dyeing
machines, computerised colour matching systems and stenter
machines for removing deformity in knitwear are some of the many
new machines that have been bought by the industry.
Customers
Supply Chain
At the center of the Tirupur Hosiery cluster are the cotton knitwear
garment exporters who may be either manufacturer exporters or
merchant exporters. According to a UNIDO report, the non-exporting
manufacturers undertake sub-contracting tasks mainly for the
exporters of both the categories mentioned above and in addition
they market the knitwear for the domestic market. There are a
number of different types of agents and traders who facilitate the
marketing activity. These actors are selling agents, depot sales
agents, commission agents and general merchants. In Tirupur, the
marketing agents have a strong role to play. They have developed
specialization in different geographical market segments, domestic
and overseas, as also in product based segments.. Further
specialization has developed to the extent that there are agents who
market only the rejected goods and the export surplus material.
In terms of employment generation, the direct employment
generated is estimated to be 100,000 skilled, semiskilled and
unskilled workers and another 100,000 persons are estimated to be
earning their livelihood due to this industry. These indirect activities
relate to the forward and backward linkages within the industry such
as cotton ginning, yarn spinning, and specialist tailoring, calendaring,
packaging and other related service activities.
Active Associations
It is perceived that among the major threats faced by the industry are
the phase out of quotas, non-tariff barriers on account of the
environment and social issues like child labour and personal safety
norms and the inability to reap benefits of economies of scale due to
fragmented holding of the manufacturing capacity.
Lack of Infrastructure
Yet, at first glance, nothing about Tirupur can make one believe that
this town earns an annual $720 million in foreign exchange. This is
because the state government and local municipal authorities have
been too slow to cope with this dynamic growth. The variance
between the town’s infrastructure and the actual requirements has
led to a sharp rise in the cost of almost every basic social input. The
present export-driven prosperity is letting Tirupur’s entrepreneurs
meet these costs, but the paucity of adequate infrastructure could
soon thwart its growth.
Water-Scarcity
Although this has been the route of participation in the export boom
for many farmers, most farmers are now getting tough. They are
badly hit by the depletion of ground water resources and because of
pollution of the water table. The entire town of 500-odd dyeing and
bleaching units dumps their effluents into the Noyyal River or throw
them on the open wasteland. The Noyyal runs all across the 27 sq km
town, virtually dividing it into two halves. According to reports from
Tirupur, about 12 lakh liters of waste water containing bleaching
powder, sulphonic dyes and inorganic catalysts and other chemicals
are discharged daily, 80 % of which are drained into Noyyal.
The processing section of the industry (dyeing, bleaching etc) has
lagged behind in modernization because of the absence of assured
water supply of acceptable quality standards. At present, there are
around 700 processing units in Tirupur which source their water
requirements from agricultural wells within a radius of about 50 kms.
Consequent to the diverse sourcing of water, there are substantial
variations in the quality of water used, leading to deficiencies in the
processing such as inability to achieve the exact shades, appearance
of spots and lack of uniformity while dyeing, resulting in frequent
rejections.
Earlier, tankers fetched water from a radius of seven kilometres
around Tirupur; now they have to go to villages located even outside
a 45-kilometre radius to get quality water. But farmers of these
villages have reportedly started physically preventing these tankers
from getting into their villages. Processors are required to go to
villages much beyond the traditional sources of water which involves
additional expenditure on petrol, and on maintenance of tankers,
resulting in a price of Rs 300-350 for every 12,000 litres of water.
However, the needs of the Tirupur industry which are for 105 million
litres of water per day are to be met by a project undertaken by the
New Tirupur Area Development Corporation Ltd., which will supply
180 million litres of water per day by the year end 2003. This will
also meet the need of residents of the area for 75 million litres of
water.
Industrial Pollution
In 1995, the Madras high court had come down heavily on Tirupur’s
dyeing units, after which the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board drew
up plans to set up a few common effluent treatment plants.
Mumbai office-
Churchgate Chambers
5, New Marine Lines
Mumbai – 400 020
Tel: 0091.22.262 4680/ 262 4651
INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONS
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
ANNEXURE II
List of Exhibitions
Event Name - Tex-Styles India 2002
Venue - Pragati Maidan-New Delhi-India
Display Range - Home Textiles,
Contact Details - Senior General Manager (TDMD)
India Trade Promotion Organisation
Pragati Maidan, New Delhi-110 001
I. Textile sector
1. Cotton/Man-made Fibre/Yarn Textile/Mill Sector 1.07 1.10 0.03
(including SSI spinning & exclusive weaving
units)
2. Man-made Fibre/Filament Yarn Industry 0.11 0.20 0.09
(including texturising industry)
(P) Provisional
Source: Foreign Trade Statistics of India (Principal Commodities & Countries) DGCIS,
Kolkata
Textile Imports from 1996-97 to April-Jan.'2003
April- Jan. 01- April-Jan.' 02-
1999-2000 2000-01 Item % variation
02 03(P)
Woollen Yarn & Fabrics 102.88 139.97 172.43 149.61 881.58 489.24
Cotton Yarn & Fabrics 1074.77 1395.68 2278.23 1815.55 3481.48 91.76
Man made filament/
9669.06 9843.74 13871.97 11852.99 16068.14 35.56
spun yarn (inc. waste)
Madeup Textiles Articles1144.52 1910.46 1717.35 1485.36 1598.31 7.60
Other Textile Yarn,
Fabrics & Madeup 10022.03 12084.64 14059.48 11754.72 13754.96 17.02
Articles
Readymade Garments
699.38 978.30 1724.89 1539.23 899.24 -41.58
(Wovn & Knit)
Raw Jute 1393.09 795.01 956.78 760.49 888.17 16.79
Raw Silk 4127.44 4732.61 6207.81 4778.37 5552.74 16.21
Raw Wool 4919.27 4578.13 6190.84 5177.94 6846.73 32.23
Synthetic &
1842.99 2711.92 2721.35 2371.74 3105.80 30.95
Regenerated Fibres
Silk yarn & fabrics 619.75 910.21 1711.62 1300.99 2391.65 83.83
Woollen and Cotton
1016.78 1440.93 1070.85 949.08 750.51 -20.92
Rags etc.
Cotton Raw & Waste 12539.28 11847.27 20515.79 18146.36 9324.24 -48.62
Textile Yarn, Fabrics &
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Madeup Articles
Total Textiles imports 49171.229 53368.864 73199.39 62082.44 65543.54 5.58
Ovarall Imports 2155285.31 2283066.42 2436448.42 2028576.98 2420068.48 19.30
Source Foreign Trade Statistics of India (Principal Commodities & Countries) DGCIS,
Calcutta.
Production of Cloth
(In Mn. Sq.Mtrs)
100%
Khadi,
Blended Non Grand
Year Cotton Total Wool
yarn Cotton Total
& Silk
Yarn
1997-98 19992 5751 11153 36896 545 37441
1998-99 17948 5700 11895 35543 584 36127
1999-00 18989 5913 13725 38627 581 39207
2000-01 19718 6351 13606 39675 558 40233
2001-02 19769 6287 15334 41390 644 42034
2002-03 (P)
Apr 1675 504 1322 3501 48 3549
May 1609 519 1388 3516 48 3564
June 1658 470 1090 3218 55 3273
July 1744 488 1270 3502 55 3557
August 1623 520 1586 3729 54 3783
September 1588 498 1365 3451 54 3505
October 1628 528 1501 3657 54 3711
November 1530 526 1393 3449 54 3503
December 1663 561 1329 3553 54 3607
January 1631 537 1512 3680 54 3734
February 1462 502 1228 3192 54 3246
March 1635 523 1123 3282 54 3336
Apr - March
2002-03 (P) 19496 6020 16381 41897 644 42541
2001-02 19769 6287 15334 16381 644 42034
Item Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
Filament
(MKT) Avg.
2002-2003 9.34 9.59 10.05
Nil Nil 2 -3 1 Nil 13 Nil -1 Nil 2 3
-23 -23 -36 -18 -3 2 17 15 15 13 5 4
2001-2002 NA 8.81 8.81 8.38 8.14 7.85 7.88 8.19 8.22 8.59 8.71 8.78
Nil Nil 2 -3 1 Nil 13 Nil -1 Nil 2 3
-23 -23 -36 -18 -3 2 17 15 15 13 5 4
2000-2001 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 9.01 9.03 8.91
Nil Nil 2 -3 1 Nil 13 Nil -1 Nil 2 3
-23 -23 -36 -18 -3 2 17 15 15 13 5 4
1999-2000 7.46 7.46 7.61 7.41 7.46 7.46 8.41 8.44 8.38 8.38 8.53 8.78
PV(M) Nil Nil 2 -3 1 Nil 13 Nil -1 Nil 2 3
PV(Y) -23 -23 -36 -18 -3 2 17 15 15 13 5 4
1998-1999 9.66 9.66 11.97 9.02 7.68 7.29 7.16 7.32 7.28 7.44 8.1 7.49
PV(M) : % Variation w.r.t. previous month.
PV(Y) : % Variation w.r.t. same month of previous year.
N.A : Not Available, n.a : Not Applicable
100%
Financial Cotton Blended Non Total Growth
. . . . . .
Year Yarn Yarn Cotton Qty. rate
Yarn
Growth % Growth % Growth %
. Qty. Qty. Qty. . .
rate Share rate Share rate Share
1995-
1788 13% 75% 395 14% 17% 195 23% 8% 2378 14%
1996
1996-
2148 20% 77% 484 22% 17% 162 -17% 6% 2794 17%
1997
1997-
2213 3% 74% 583 20% 20% 178 10% 6% 2973 6%
1998
1998- 2022 -9% 72% 595 2% 21% 191 7% 7% 2808 -6%
1999
1999-
2204 9% 72% 621 4% 20% 221 16% 7% 3046 8%
2000
2000-
2268 3% 72% 644 4% 20% 246 11% 8% 3158 4%
2001
2001-
2212 -2% 71% 609 -5% 20% 280 14% 9% 3101 -2%
2002
2001-
2002 2029 -2% 71% 560 -5% 20% 254 13% 9% 2843 -2%
(Apr-Feb)
2002-
2003 1987 -2% 71% 535 -4% 19% 289 14% 10% 2811 -1%
(Apr-Feb)
MILL SECTOR
1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 99-2000 2000-2001 2001- 2002-03 (P)
(Revised) 2002
Cotton 1262 1159 1222 1238 1111 1105 1106 1036 1023
Blended 746 602 488 466 444 379 332 296 262
100% Non 263 258 247 244 230 230 232 214 214
Cotton
Total 2271 2019 1957 1948 1785 1714 1670 1546 1499
HANDLOOM SECTOR
Cotton 5429 6239 6441 6699 5861 6376 6577 6698 5160
Blended 13 18 52 69 111 119 111 95 122)
100% Non 738 945 963 835 820 857 818 792 791
Cotton
Total 6180 7202 7456 7603 6792 7352 7506 7585 6073
ALL SECTORS
Cotton 17019 18900 19841 19992 17948 18989 19718 19769 19496
Blended 3661 4025 4888 5751 5700 5913 6351 6287 6020
100% Non 7495 8535 9569 11153 11895 13725 13606 15334 16381
Cotton
Total 28175 31460 34298 36896 35543 38627 39675 41390 41897
Khadi, 431 498 540 545 584 581 558 644 644
Wool & Silk
Grand 28606 31958 34838 37441 36127 39208 40233 42034 42541
Total
Figures in bracket indicates the corresponding period of the previous year
O/o the Textile Commissioner
China 19.6 22.5 19.2 22.5 22.2 24.2 23.5 25.5 24.3 26.2 24.5 26.2
India 12.7 14.5 12.6 14.8 13.5 14.7 13.6 14.8 13.2 14.2 13.2 14.1
United States 11.3 12.9 10.4 12.2 10.2 11.1 8.9 9.7 7.5 8.1 7.6 8.1
Pakistan 7.2 8.2 7 8.2 7.6 8.3 8.1 8.8 8.5 9.2 8.5 9.1
Turkey 5 5.7 4.6 5.4 5.6 6.1 5.1 5.5 5.9 6.4 6 6.4
Brazil 3.4 3.9 3.9 4.6 4.1 4.5 4.3 4.7 4.2 4.5 4.3 4.6
European Union 5.3 6.1 4.8 5.6 4.8 5.2 4.7 5.1 4.7 5.1 4.7 5.0
Indonesia 1.8 2.1 2.2 2.6 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.6
Mexico 2 2.3 2.2 2.6 2.4 2.6 2.1 2.3 2 2.2 2.1 2.2
Thailand 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.9
Russia 1.2 1.4 0.9 1.1 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.9
South Korea 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.7
Taiwan 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.6 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.3
Japan 1.4 1.6 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2
Uzbekistan 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.3
Other 11.6 13.3 11.2 13.1 11.2 12.2 11.5 12.5 11.5 12.4 11.6 12.4
World Total 87.3 85.3 91.8 92.1 92.7 93.5