Course Outline - IP
Course Outline - IP
Course Outline - IP
B. OBJECTIVES:
C. OUTLINE
I. Introduction
a. General Concept of IP
b. Historical Background
c. Overview of the IP system
a. State Policies
1
b. Trademark and Service Marks
1. Definition
2. Nature and Function of Trademark
3. Registrability of Trademark
4. Dominancy Test vs. Holistic Test
5. Identical or Related Goods and Confusion of Business
6. Registration Process
7. Inter Partes Cases
8. Infringement
9. Unfair Competition
10. Remedies
References:
Registrability of Trademark
Victorio P. Diaz vs. People of the Philippines and Levi Strauss [Phils.] Inc.
G.R. No. 180677, 18 February 2013
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. v. Inter Pacific Industrial Trading Corp. G.R. No.
164321, 28 March 2011
Berris Agricultural Co., Inc. vs. Norvy Abyadang , G.R. No. 183404,
13 October 2010
Coffee Partners, Inc. vs. San Francisco Coffee & Roastery, Inc.,
G.R. No. 169504, 03 March 2010
2
Mcdonald’s Corp. vs. Macjoy Fastfood Corporation, G.R. No. 166115,
02 February 2007
Mcdonald’s Corp. vs. L.C. Big Mak Burger, Inc., G.R. No. 143993,
18 August 2004
Societe Des Produits Nestle vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 112012,
04 April 2001
Fruit Of The Loom, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-32747,
29 November 1984
Hickok Manufacturing Co., Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-44707,
31 August 1982
Esso Standard Eastern, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals and United Cigarette
Corporation, G.R. No. L-29971, 31 August 1982
246 Corporation, doing business under the name and style of Rolex
Music Lounge vs. Hon. Reynaldo B. Daway, in his capacity as Presiding
Judge of RTC Branch 90, Quezon City, GR No. 157216, November 20,
2003
Remedies
3
Sehwani, Incorporated vs. In-N-Out Burger, Inc., G.R. No. 171053,
15 October 2007
E.Y. Industrial Sales, Inc. v. Shen Dar Electricity and Machinery Co., Ltd.
(G.R. No. 184850, 20 Oct. 2010)
Levi Strauss & Co., v. Clinton Apparelle, Inc., G.R. No. 138900, 20
September 2005
Tanduay Distillers, Inc. vs. Ginebra San Miguel, Inc. , G.R. No. 164324,
14 August 2009
Levi Strauss & Co. vs. Clinton Apparelle, Inc., G.R. No. 138900,
20 September 2005
Societe Des Produits Nestle, S.A. vs. Martin T. Dy, Jr., G.R. No. 172276,
08 August 2010
4
c. Copyright and Related Rights
1. Definition
2. Nature and Purpose of Copyright Protection
3. Scope of Copyright
4. Derivative Works
5. Works Not Protected
6. Copyright on Economic Rights
7. Ownership of Copyright
8. Transfer or Ownership of Copyright
9. Limitations on Copyright
10. Deposit and Notice
11. Moral Rights
12. Rights to Proceeds in Subsequent Transfers
13. Rights of Performers, Producers of Sounds Recordings and
Broadcasting Organizations
14. Producers of Sound Recordings
15. Broadcasting Organizations
16. Limitations on Protection
17. Term of Protection
18. Infringement
19. Remedies
References:
Section 171 to 229, Republic Act No. 8293, as amended by R.A. No. 10372
Lipton vs. The Nature Company, USCA, 2nd District, November 28, 1995
David Woods, et al. vs. Bourne Co., USCA, 2 nd Circuit, July 25, 1995
Pearl and Dean vs. Shoemart, G.R. No. 148222, 15 August 2003
Francisco G. Joaquin vs. Franklin Drilon, G.R. No. 108946, 28 January 1999
Filipino Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Inc. vs. Tan, 148
SCRA 461
Williams and Wilkins Co. vs. The United States Court of Claims,
487 F. 2d 1345, 1973
5
In the matter of the charges of plagiarism against Associate Justice Mariano
C. Del Castillo, A.M. No. 10-7-17-SC, 12 October 2010
NBI-Microsoft Corp. vs. Judy Hwang, et al., G.R. No. 147043, 21 June 2005
d. Patents
1. Definition
2. Nature and Purpose of Patent Protection
3. Patentability
3.1. Patentable Invention
3.2. Non-Patentable Invention
3.3. Novelty
3.4. Prior Art
3.5. Non Prejudicial Disclosure
3.6. Inventive Step
3.7. Industrial Applicability
4. Right to a Patent
5. Patent Registration Process
5.1 . Patent Application
5.2 . Procedure for Grant of Patent
6. Cancellation of Patents
7. Remedies of a Person with a Right to a Patent
8. Rights of Patentees and Infringement of Patents
8.1. Rights Conferred
8.2. Limitations
8.3. Infringements
9. Voluntary Licensing
10. Compulsory Licensing
11. Utility Models
12. Industrial Designs
References:
Pearl and Dean vs. Shoemart, G.R. No. 148222, 15 August 2003
Smith Kline Beckman Corporation vs. Tryco Pharma, G.R. No. 126627,
14 August 2003
6
Maguan vs. Court of Appeals, 146 SCRA 107
United States vs. Adams, et al., US Supreme Court, February 21, 1966
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. Inc., et al. vs. Ray-O-Vac Co. US Supreme
Court, February 28, 1944
e. Other IPRs
1. Geographic Indications
2. Layout-Designs (Topographies) of Integrated Circuits
3. Protection of Undisclosed Information
a. Organization
b. Functions
c. Office of the Director General
d. Bureau of Legal Affairs
e. Bureau of Trademarks
f. Bureau of Patents
g. Documentation, Information and Technology Transfer Bureau
h. National Committee on Intellectual Property Rights (NCIPR)
References:
7
g. Madrid Protocol, 2012