Management of Nasolabial Cysts by Transnasal Endoscopic Marsupialization
Management of Nasolabial Cysts by Transnasal Endoscopic Marsupialization
Management of Nasolabial Cysts by Transnasal Endoscopic Marsupialization
Objective: To evaluate hospitalization rates and dura- Main Outcome Measures: History, clinical presen-
tion of surgery associated with transnasal endoscopic mar- tation, preoperative condition, histopathologic find-
supialization compared with sublabial excision in treat- ings, treatment, complications, and outcomes.
ing nasolabial cysts.
Results: The mean duration of surgery was 91.3 min-
utes in the sublabial group and 29.5 minutes in the trans-
Design: Retrospective clinical series. nasal group (P =.003). The hospitalization rate was 100%
(23 of 23) in the sublabial group and 59% (20 of 34) in
Setting: Large urban community hospital. the transnasal group (P 1 .001). The medical costs were
significantly lower in the transnasal group than in the
Patients: Consecutive sample of 57 patients with na- sublabial group (P =.002). The follow-up period ranged
solabial cysts treated from January 1, 2000, to February from 6 to 85 months. Neither group of patients experi-
29, 2008. enced any major complications or recurrences during the
follow-up period.
Interventions : Sublabial excision in 23 patients Conclusion: Transnasal endoscopic marsupialization is
(sublabial group) and transnasal endoscopic marsupi- an effective treatment for nasolabial cysts, is less costly,
alization in 34 patients (transnasal group). Among 57 and has fewer complications than sublabial excision.
patients, 47 underwent preoperative computed tomog-
raphy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135(9):932-935
N
nasolabial cysts. Although the procedure has
been performed easily and safely in pa-
tients, to our knowledge, no large-scale stud-
ies of this technique have been conducted.
The objective of this study was to compare
soni n theofWestrnAfrican ancestryworld.
traditional sublabial excision with transna-
Most patients are women aged 40 to 60 sal endoscopic marsupialization in the man-
years.1 Diagnosis is made on the basis of agement of nasolabial cysts. Our study rep-
clinical features such as midfacial asym- resents the largest series of patients with
metric swelling and nasal obstruction. The nasolabial cysts among the Chinese popu-
painless cysts develop slowly, but pa- lation to date. It is also the first study to de-
tients may be seen with an acutely pain- fine the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of
Author Affiliations: Division of ful swelling if the cyst becomes infected. transnasal endoscopic marsupialization for
Rhinology, Department of In some patients, facial cellulites may de- the treatment of nasolabial cysts.
Otolaryngology, Chang Gung velop after expansion of a secondary in-
Memorial Hospital (Drs Chao,
fection. 2-5 Clinically, the cysts appear as
Huang, Chang, Y.-L. Chen, METHODS
C.-W. Chen, and Lee), and
smooth fluctuant soft-tissue masses be-
Graduate Institute of Clinical tween the upper lip and nasal aperture,
Medical Sciences (Drs Huang with obliteration of the nasolabial fold and This study was approved by the Institutional
and Chang), Chang Gung elevation of the nasal ala. Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hos-
University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. Thus far, surgical excision through a sub- pital. Sixty patients diagnosed as having naso-
labial approach has been the most popular
and well-established procedure for the man-
agement of nasolabial cysts. Although prom-
ising results with low recurrence rates have
been reported, complications include he-
(REPRINTED) ARCH OTOLARYNGOL HEAD NECK SURG/VOL 135 (NO. 9), SEP 2009 WWW.ARCHOTO.COM
932
RESULTS
(REPRINTED) ARCH OTOLARYNGOL HEAD NECK SURG/VOL 135 (NO. 9), SEP 2009 WWW.ARCHOTO.COM
933
(REPRINTED) ARCH OTOLARYNGOL HEAD NECK SURG/VOL 135 (NO. 9), SEP 2009 WWW.ARCHOTO.COM
934
©2009 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 08/30/2019
With smaller lesions, it is difficult to find the cyst in the the surgical treatment of nasolabial cysts compared with
nasal cavity using an endoscope. We further found that sublabial excision, especially for patients with large le-
the size of the cyst closely parallels that of the protrud- sions. Transnasal endoscopic marsupialization can be per-
ing part in the nasal cavity (mostly in the nasal floor). In formed in an outpatient setting, with fewer postsurgical
the present study, the mean cyst diameter was signifi- sequelae than those associated with sublabial excision.
cantly larger in the transnasal group than in the subla-
bial group (P =.001). Therefore, the size of the cyst and Submitted for Publication: December 30, 2008; final re-
the related protruding part in the nasal cavity were im- vision received March 8, 2009; accepted March 18, 2009.
portant considerations when making decisions about an Correspondence: Ta-Jen Lee, MD, Division of Rhinol-
appropriate surgical approach. Based on this, sublabial ogy, Department of Otolaryngology, Chang Gung Memo-
excision may be a better choice of operation in patients rial Hospital, Chang Gung University, 5 Fu Hsing St, Kuei
with smaller lesions. Shan, Taoyuan, Taiwan (entlee@adm.cgmh.org.tw).
Transnasal endoscopic marsupialization can be per- Author Contributions: All authors had full access to all
formed safely in an outpatient setting. Nasal packing was the data in the study and take responsibility for the in-
not required in our patients. Minimal blood loss during tegrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
surgery was noted, and no postoperative bleeding was Study concept and design: Huang, C.-W. Chen, and Lee.
encountered. Nevertheless, as a safety precaution, we ini- Acquisition of data: Huang, Y.-L. Chen, and C.-W. Chen.
tially admitted most of our earlier patients undergoing Analysis and interpretation of data: Chao, Chang, and Y.-L.
transnasal endoscopic marsupialization into the hospi- Chen. Drafting of the manuscript: Chao and Y.-L. Chen.
tal, and only 14 patients in this group were treated in an Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellec-
outpatient surgery setting. tual content: Huang, Chang, C.-W. Chen, and Lee. Sta-
The mean duration of surgery for transnasal endo- tistical analysis: Huang, Y.-L. Chen, and C.-W.
scopic marsupialization was longer in our study than in Chen. Ad-
the study by Su et al.6 This may be because the cyst mu- ministrative, technical, and material support:Chao, Huang,
cosal lining was removed as much as possible to mini- Chang, Y.-L. Chen, and Lee. Study supervision: C.-W.
mize recurrence in our earlier patients, resulting in a Chen.
longer duration of surgery. Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Complications of sublabial excision of nasolabial cysts
reported in the literature include postsurgical hema- REFERENCES
toma, oronasal fistula, and infection.3,5 However, our pa-
tients experienced no major complications. In the sub- 1. Klestadt WD. Nasal cysts and the facial cleft cyst theory.
labial group, postsurgical sequelae included toothache, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol.
1953;62(1):84-92.
swelling, and numbness of the nasal alar area. Some symp-
2. Kuriloff DB. The nasolabial cyst–nasal hamartoma. Otolaryngol
toms are indistinct and may persist for more than 3 Head Neck Surg.
months. One patient in the transnasal group described 1987;96(3):268-272.
an air bubble–like sensation when she pressed over the 3. David VC, O’Connell JE. Nasolabial cyst. Clin Otolaryngol
Allied Sci. 1986;11(1):
previous site of the cyst, which possibly occurred be- 5-8.
cause the stoma was not large enough for sufficient drain- 4. Wesley RK, Scannell T, Nathan LE. Nasolabial cyst: presentation of
a case with a
age. Finally, the transnasal group experienced fewer post-
review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
surgical sequelae than the sublabial group. 1984;42(3):188-192.
There are several limitations to our study that re- 5. Bull TR, McNeill KA, Milner G, Murray SM.
Naso-alveolar cysts. J Laryngol Otol.
quire further investigations. First, this study is retrospec- 1967;81(1):37-44.
tive, with patient selection that is not randomized. Sec- 6. Su CY, Chien CY, Hwang CF. A new transnasal
ond, a postoperative follow-up questionnaire should be approach to endoscopic marsu-
pialization of the nasolabial cyst. Laryngoscope. 1999;109(7, pt
mandatory and may improve evaluation in our future stud- 1):1116-1118.
ies. Third, further prospective studies may be needed to 7. Allard RH. Nasolabial cyst: review of the literature and report of 7 cases. Int J
compare these different surgical approaches, especially Oral Surg. 1982;11(6):351-359.
the duration of surgery and postsurgical complications. 8. Choi JH, Cho JH, Kang HJ, et al. Nasolabial cyst: a retrospective analysis of 18
cases. Ear Nose Throat J. 2002;81(2):94-96.
In conclusion, transnasal endoscopic marsupializa- 9. Yuen HW, Julian CY, Samuel CL. Nasolabial cysts: clinical features, diagnosis,
tion is a cost-effective and less burdensome option for and treatment. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;45(4):293-297.
10. Hillman T, Galloway EB, Johnson LP. Pathology quiz
case 1: nasoalveolar cyst.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:452-454.
11. Kato H, Kanematsu M, Kusunoki Y, et al. Nasoalveolar cyst: imaging findings in
three cases. Clin Imaging. 2007;31(3):206-209.
12. Su CY, Huang HT, Liu HY, Huang CC, Chien CY.
Scanning electron microscopic
study of the nasolabial cyst: its clinical and embryological implications.
Laryngoscope. 2006;116(2):307-311.
(REPRINTED) ARCH OTOLARYNGOL HEAD NECK SURG/VOL 135 (NO. 9), SEP 2009 WWW.ARCHOTO.COM
935