Near Field Region
Near Field Region
1
& will be the least dominant
kr
κI ol sin θ − jκr
Eθ ≈ jη 4πr e
Er = Eφ = H r = H θ = 0 (16) TEM wave
H ϕ ≈ j κI ol sin θ e − jκr
4πr
η I ol sin θ j
2 2
W = Wav = ar 1 − (κr ) 3
8 λ r 2
In the far field we can rewrite this eqn as:
η κI ol sin θ
2 2
Wav = ar
2 4π r 2 (17)
Recall Radiation Intensity is:
η κI ol sin θ
2 2
U = r Wav = r
2 2
or
2 4π r 2
2
r ηκ I 2
l sin θ r 2
⇒U = =
o 2
Eθ
2η 4πr 2η
Umax occurs at θ = π 2 ⇒
η κI ol 2 π η κI ol
2 2
U max = sin ( ) =
2 4π 2 2 4π
We know that directivity Do is given by:
η κI ol
2
U max 2 4π 3
Do = 4π = =
π I ol
2
Prad 2
η
3 λ
λ 2
3λ 2
Ae = Do =
4π 8π
Small Dipole
λ / 50 ≤ l ≤ λ / 10
In this case, the current distribution along the small dipole is:
2 l
a z I o (1 − l z ' ) 0 ≤ z ' ≤ 2
I ( x' , y ' , z ' ) =
2 l
a z I o (1 + z ' ) − ≤ z ' ≤ 0
l 2
µ 0
2 e − j κR
l
2
2 e − jκR
I o (1 + z ' )
4π −∫l ∫0
A= dz '+ I (1 − z ' ) dz '
o
l R l R
2
(18)
− jκr
Which leads to: 1 µI o le
Az = a z
(19)
2 4πr
Note: Az for the small dipole is ½ that of the infinitesimal dipole
In the far field we get:
κI ol sin θ − jκr
Eθ ≈ jη e (20)
8πr
Er = Eφ = H r = Hθ = 0 (21)
κI ol sin θ − jκr
Hϕ ≈ j e (22)
8πr
2
l
The radiation resistance is: Rr = 20π 2
λ
Separation of Regions
2D 2
Let us see why we choose: R ≥ as the far field region.
λ
Let us start with:
µ e − jκR
A( x ', y ', z ') = ∫
4π c
I ( x' , y ' , z ' )
R
dl ' (23)
r 2 r 2
Best approximation is: R ≈ r − z ' cos θ
This means that the next largest term that is neglected is the 3rd term
1 z '2 z ' 2
i.e. sin 2 θ = for θ = 90o
r 2 max 2r
z '2
This means that if we neglect this term we can have an error of
2r
z '2
• for an infinitesimal dipole z′ is very small so the term is
2r
really small & hence R ≈ r .
− jkR − jk ( r − z 'cosθ )
e e
≈ (29)
R r
The far field distance rff is
that value of r for which
the path length deviation
due to neglecting the 3rd
term in eqn (28) is not
more than λ/16.
2π λ π
That corresponds to phase error of: kR = = = 22.5o
λ 16 8
If we choose l as the length of the line source then z' = l
2
l ) 2
z' 2π 2
2 ( π
⇒k = ≤
2r λ 2r 8
2π l 2 π 2l 2
or ≤ ⇒r≥
λ 8r 8 λ
2D 2
or in general r≥
λ
A similar analysis can be used to find the Fresnel (near field)
region as:
D3 2D 2
0.62 ≤r≤
λ λ
& the reactive near field as
D3
r ≤ 0.62
λ
Finite Length Dipole
l l
a z I o sin[ k ( 2 − z ' )] 0 ≤ z ' ≤ 2
I ( x ', y ', z ') = (30)
l l
a z I o sin[ k ( + z ' )] − ≤ z ' ≤ 0
2 2
for l = λ
2
Previously, we found for the infinitesimal dipole of length l that in
the far field:
κI ( x' , y ' , z ) sin θ − jκR (31)
Eθ ≈ jη e l
4πR
κI ( x' , y ' , z ) sin θ − jκR
Hϕ ≈ j e l (32)
4πR
If we let l = dz ' then eqn (31) & (32) become:
κl κl
cos( cosθ ) − cos( )
I o e − jκr
Eθ ≈ jη
2 2
(39)
2πr sin θ
Similarly,
κl κl
− jκr cos(
cosθ ) − cos( )
Eθ I oe 2 2
Hφ = ≈ j (40)
η 2πr sin θ
Power density
κl κl
* 2
cos( cosθ ) − cos( )
1 I
Wav = Re[ E × H ] = arη o 2 2 2
(40)
2 8πr sin θ
Radiation Intensity
κl κl
2
η Io cos( 2 cosθ ) − cos( 2 )
2
U = r Wav =
2
(41)
8π 2 sin θ
[3-D and 2-D amplitude pattern for a thin dipole of l = 1.25λ]
Power
κl κl
2
2 π
cos( cos θ ) − cos( )
= ∫∫Wav dS = η
Io 2 2
Prad
s
4π 0 ∫ sin θ
dθ (42)
or
2
Io
{C + ln(κl ) − Ci (κl ) + sin(κl )[Si (2κl ) − 2 Si (κl )]
1
Prad =η
4π 2
1 κl
+ cos(κl ) C + ln( ) + Ci (2κl ) − 2Ci (κl )} (43)
2 2
x x
sin y
Ci ( x ) = ∫
cos y
dy Si ( x ) = ∫ dy
where C = 0.5772 y y
∞
∞
Cosine Integral Sine Integral
Similarly:
η
{C + ln(κl ) − Ci (κl ) + sin(κl )[Si (2κl ) − 2 Si (κl )]
2 Prad 1
Rr = =
Io
2
2π 2
1 κl
+ cos(κl ) C + ln( ) + Ci (2κl ) − 2Ci (κl )} (44)
2 2
Directivity
Input Resistance
Rr
Rin = (45)
2 kl
sin
2
Half Wavelength Dipole
By placing l = λ/2, in all previous eqns. for the finite length
dipole yields:
π
− jκ r cos cos θ
Eθ ≈ jη
Ioe
2 (46)
2π r sin θ
π
− jκ r cos cos θ
H=
Eθ
≈ j
Ioe
2
φ
η 2π r sin θ
(47)
Do=1.643
λ 2
Aem = Do = 0.13λ2 (48)
4π
Finally:
2 Prad η
Rr = = Cin ( 2π ) ≈ 73Ω
Io
2
4π
1 − cos y
x
Where Cin ( x ) =∫ dy
0
y