Living Standard in Delhi Slums Occupation, Income and Expenditure Pattern of Migrants (A Study of Delhi Slum Migrants)
Living Standard in Delhi Slums Occupation, Income and Expenditure Pattern of Migrants (A Study of Delhi Slum Migrants)
Living Standard in Delhi Slums Occupation, Income and Expenditure Pattern of Migrants (A Study of Delhi Slum Migrants)
net/publication/309012595
CITATIONS READS
0 2,167
1 author:
Jeetendra Yadav
Indian Council of Medical Research
30 PUBLICATIONS 17 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Jeetendra Yadav on 12 October 2016.
2277 - 5846
Abstract:
The primary objective of the study is to examine the occupation status of the Delhi slum migrants, and to know their
income and expenditure pattern. The study also examine, whether the vocational/ on job training/skilled training to help
getting the new job, expectation towards facilities while selecting a new job and reason behind changing the job. The
present study has been schematized into four sections. Section one encompasses abstract, introduction, review of
literature and objectives of the study while section two presents data source and methodology and coverage of the
study. Section three incorporates results and discussion and genesis of the survey of the slum migrants while section
four focuses on major findings and summary of the study. The existence of Slum is a global phenomenon. As described
by social scientist, slum is a by-product of modern era. In the rapid spread of slums, resulting not merely from shortage
of housing but also from the low earnings of the workers engaged in less productive activities has become an endemic
feature of the urbanization process in developing countries. Urban slums and urban poverty are popularly interpreted
as synonymous of each other. The outgrowth of slums in India is the fall out of poverty and deprivation. Primary data
were collected from 1060 male migrants aged 15-35 years residing in five different slums in Delhi to address the
objective. A cross-sectional survey design with multi-stage systematic sampling method was used to select the
respondents for this study. Bivariate analyses including chi square tests were performed for this study. Majority of the
slum dwellers are engaged in informal sector. The pre and post employment status of bring out a significant change in
employment pattern among migrants. Before migration majority of them are engaged in studies or they are unemployed
followed by self-employed in agriculture. However, after migration majority of them (around 3/5th) are worked as
unskilled labourer followed by service in private sector. This shows migration is mostly towards informal sector and
most of the people left their school and migrate to get a job to maintain their livelihood.
Key words: Delhi slum, Migration, Migrants, Occupation, Income, Expenditure, Substance use, Vocational training, On
job skilled/training.
“struggling for living and living in the present, investing in the future” that indicates livelihood sustainability for the future
generation [5]. There is a close correspondence among the informal sector employment, urban poverty and slum in-habitation [6].
A number of studies have explored the empirical analysis of the Engel's law by using household budget on food and non-food
items in both developed and developing economies. A study by Rao and Raddy on household consumption pattern revealed that
food and non-food articles are treated as necessities and luxuries in rural Andhra Pradesh and food articles like milk and milk
products, pulses, egg, fish, & meat, and sugar are found to be more elastic than others [7]. Gupta in his study found that the MPC's
are found to be very high for food items compared to those of non-food items and the food items were necessities while most non-
food items are luxuries and semi-luxuries [8]. In Bangladesh, Ghosh, evidenced that in both rural and urban areas, cereals,
vegetables, edible oil and clothing are treated as necessities but pulses and beverages are necessities in urban areas [9]. On the
other hand, egg, fish, meat and sugar are found to be luxuries in both urban and rural areas. Other important studies of Engel’s law
on consumption budget of the family by several scientists [10-14]. In much of Asia, the urban poor households are not only
strongly integrated into the economy, but also seek to diversify their income and pooling activities by having multiple family
members engaged in different types of activities in the economy [15]. In the urban area, the growth rate of labour force absorption
in the organized sector is generally much lower than the population growth rate, which leads to inevitable growth of informal
sector. The urban informal sector emerges by absorbing the rural migrants and serve as a ‘holding’ sector for these migrants [4].
Total expenditure has been regarded as one of the important variables in the expenditure on different food and non-food items.
Explanation regarding share of expenditure can be made para-metrically by estimating a functional equation relating to the
expenditure on food and non-food items with respect to total expenditure and other demographic characteristics like family size.
Same finding revels some others studies also [16-19]. There are some equally important determinants in the expenditure pattern of
the households like age, education and family size. So far as consumption pattern of the squatters is concerned, it is very important
to analyze the income-expenditure pattern of migrants and their aspiration to stay in Delhi slum. The present paper analyses the
occupation, income and expenditure pattern of migrants and also explore the burden of migrants due to different type of
expenditures, for example burden of substances use and other life-style activities as well as health status etc.
throughout their working and social life. The formal sector job opportunities for the unskilled and less educated workers continue
to shrink, and the employment created during the period of economic reform remains entirely informal. At the national level, the
unorganized sector constitutes 93 percent of the workforce [25-26]. When migrants were migrating to somewhere from their
native place they were doing some work also before migrating and well as after migration. The study also brought out the fact that
they were doing any work before migration, first time engaged in employment and type of occupation after the migration and also
current employment status and type of occupation. The information about mean working time, work in night shift, frequency of
night shift, risk at working place, aspiration towards facilities while join the new job, benefit from the current employer, on job
skilled training, main transport facility to commute work place and total travel time from residence to working place etc, were also
collected during the survey time.
Work Status n %
Type of work done before migrating to Delhi
Study 401 37.8
Unemployment 314 29.6
Employed 78 7.4
Agricultural labour 105 9.9
Self employed in agricultural land 150 14.2
Helping family business 8 0.8
Others 4 0.4
Work profile first time in Delhi
Government service 6 0.6
Private service 249 23.5
Skilled labour 108 10.2
Unskilled labour 629 59.3
Business/self employee/ 29 2.7
Student 35 3.3
Others 4 0.4
Total 1060 100.0
Table 1: Percent distribution of respondents by pre and post migration work Status
However, almost one forth (23.5%) were engaged private work whereas about (2.7%), started their own business/ self-employed
first time after migration. Only few (3.3%) were reported that they were started education first after migration to Delhi.
Variables n %
Current work status
Government employee 7 0.7
Private employee 295 27.8
Skilled labour 260 24.5
Unskilled labour 418 39.4
Business/self employee 33 3.1
Unemployment 7 0.7
Student 34 3.2
Others 6 0.6
Total 1060 100.0
Mean working time
Mean working month in a year 11.2
Mean working days in a month 26.9
Mean working hour in a days 9.1
Work in Night sift
Yes 214 21.0
No 805 79.0
Total 1019 100.0
Night sift frequency
Daily 71 33.2
Weekly 67 31.3
Monthly 14 6.5
Occasionally 62 29.0
Total 214 100.0
Risk at work place
No risk 690 65.1
Ventilation 39 3.7
Any hazard by product 228 21.5
Social image risk 47 4.4
Others 94 8.9
Total 1060 100.0
Table 2: Percent distribution of respondents by current employment status and working condition
Mean working days in a month, 26.9 days while mean working hours in a day, 9.1 hours were reported by migrants. Almost more
than one fifth (21.0%), of the migrants were doing night shift, among them, one third (33.3%), of the migrants were doing night
shift daily. The results clearly shows that around (65.1%) of the migrants were not have any type of risk at work place where as
more than one fifth (21.5%) were reported that there is a hazard risk by product.
Monthly Income n %
Average monthly income from salary
Up to 3000 12 1.2
3001- 6000 418 41.0
6001 to 9000 531 52.1
9001 and above 58 5.7
Average (mean) monthly income from salary 6660.7
Average monthly income from over time
No overtime 770 75.6
Up to 1000 136 13.3
1001 to 2000 111 10.9
2001 and above 2 0.2
Average (mean) monthly income from over time 304.5
Average monthly income from others sources
Up to 1000 998 97.9
1001 to 2000 12 1.2
2001 and above 9 0.9
Average (mean) monthly income from others sources 82.8
Total 1019 100
Tobacco Alcohol
Background Characteristics
Mean SD Mean SD
Age group
15-20 232.8 167.7 354.2 233.1
21-25 268.3 165.2 337.0 185.6
26-30 316.4 195.7 407.9 292.1
31-35 287.4 219.8 454.8 386.2
Marital Status
Never Married 253.9 172.8 390.5 282.5
Currently Married 293.9 190.2 377.2 266.9
Others 462.9 268.7 500.0 154.9
Level of Education
Below Primary 346.9 264.2 401.5 306.3
Primary Completed 312.2 189.1 409.7 352.9
Middle Completed 278.0 185.9 380.8 292.0
Secondary 273.1 175.7 401.8 233.4
Higher Secondary and above 272.1 172.6 334.5 168.0
Wealth quintile
Poorest 284.3 159.3 381.9 214.6
Poorer 302.3 197.2 426.9 220.0
Middle 299.2 188.7 351.7 298.0
Richer 268.3 193.4 346.0 300.9
Richest 268.2 205.2 407.7 312.9
Duration of staying in Delhi
At least one year (ref) 175.7 114.0 542.5 586.9
2-4 270.1 163.3 360.8 216.3
5-8 303.7 198.2 375.8 239.7
9-10 304.7 230.3 428.5 357.9
Number of moved
1 287.8 189.1 382.7 282.0
2 275.6 176.7 397.0 264.6
3 279.1 206.1 356.8 156.0
Staying with whom
Alone 268.6 189.8 423.1 228.9
Family member 283.7 195.2 392.2 307.3
Relatives 246.9 213.1 339.6 243.4
Friends 298.7 170.9 377.3 256.4
Total 285.1 188.1 383.0 270.7
Table 5: Percent distribution of respondents mean expenditure on substance use by background characteristics
7 Vol 4 Issue 3 ( JULY, 2015) www.theijm.com
The International Journal Of Management
As regards the monthly expenditure on alcohol the trend were same. In other words migrants belongs age group 31-35 were
spending more (454.8 ± 386.2), as compared to migrants age group 15-20 (354.2 ± 233.1). As can be seen from the table that
migrants belongs others marital categories (separated, divorced etc) were spending more on tobacco (462.9 ± 268.7) as well as on
alcohol (500.0 ± 154.9) than who were belongs currently married on tobacco (293.9 ± 190.2) and on alcohol (377.2 ± 266.9) and
never married on tobacco (253.9 ± 172.8) and on alcohol (390.5 ± 282.5), respectively.
Level of education of migrants emerged significant determinants of expenditure on substance use. Migrants who have completed
secondary level education were less spent on tobacco (272.1 ± 172.6) and on alcohol (334.5 ± 168.0), as compared to bellow
primary level education on tobacco (346.9 ± 262.2) and on alcohol (401.5 ± 306.3). Migrants belong to richest wealth quintile
were spending less on tobacco (268.2 ± 205.2) with compared to poorest wealth quintile (284.3 ± 159.3). The trends were found
reverse in case of expenditure on alcohol. In other word migrants belong to richest wealth quintile were spending more (407.7 ±
312.9) on alcohol use with compared to poorest wealth quintile (381.9 ± 214.6).
Analysis indicates that alcohol consumption constitutes the highest share of the of total substance expenditure. More than one
forth (26.3%), of the migrants expends for alcohol followed by ganja/bhag (18.6%), gutka (17.7%), bidi (14.6%), cigarette
(12.5%) and khaini (10.4%).
Cohabitation of migrants emerged significant determinants of expenditure on Health. In other words the expenditure on health was
found more (1071.3 ± 2178.0) among who have been staying alone in Delhi slum as compared to migrants staying with friends
(577.4 ± 778.8).
4.12. Expectation towards Facilities While Selecting a New Job and Change Job
Job aspiration while selecting the new job is being presented in given below in the table 9. Results shows that majority (82.5%), of
the migrants said that salary is a main choice at the time of new job, while only (10.3%), of the migrants want to see also distance
from the residence to work place. Results show that only (9.4%) migrants changed job in the past six months and among them
majority (42.0%) changed the job for better income, followed by contracted ended (29.0%).
Variables n %
Aspiration towards facilities while selecting a new job (multiple answer)
Distance from your residence 868 81.9
Transportation facility 356 33.6
Holidays 403 38.0
Shift in a job (day and night) 421 39.7
Salary 953 89.9
Promotion Charges 334 31.5
In service training 212 20.0
Health insurance/medical benefit 140 13.2
Reimbursement for life risk 101 9.5
Others 48 4.5
Changed job in last six months
Yes 100 9.4
No 960 90.6
Total 1060 100.0
Reason for living the job
Better opportunity 8 8.0
Better income 42 42.0
Contracted ended 29 29.0
Employer indicted 21 21.0
Total 100 100.0
Table 9: Percent distribution of respondents by aspiration towards facilities while selecting a new job and change job in last sixth
month.
Variables n %
Vocational training
Yes 67 6.3
No 993 93.7
Total 1060 100
Name of the vocational training
ITI 47 70.1
Computer course 18 26.9
Others 2 3.0
Total 67 100
On job training/skilled from employer
Yes 133 12.5
No 927 87.5
Total 1060 100
Name of the On job training/skilled
Electrician 92 69.2
Computer training 8 6.0
Painting 5 3.8
Belding 6 4.5
Machine operator 13 9.8
Others 9 6.8
Total 133 100
Table 10: Percent distribution of respondents by vocational training /on job training
Results show that one of every eight (12.5%) of the migrants have any types of on job training/skilled from employers. Among
those who have any type of on job training/skilled, majority (69.2%) of the migrants have electrician while (9.8%) of the migrants
have machine operator training. Only (4.5%) have Belding whereas (3.8%) of the migrants have painting training and (6.8%) of
the migrants have others type of on job training/skilled training.
Variables n %
Vocational/skilled training help to getting job
Yes 832 78.5
No 228 21.5
Total 1060 100
Extent Vocational/skilled training help to getting job
Very little 52 6.3
Somewhat 358 43.0
Very much 422 50.7
Total 832 100
Table 11: Percent distribution of respondent by Vocational/ on job raining/skilled training to help getting the job
7. References
i. Stiglitz, J. E (1973): “Alternative Theories of Wage Determination and Unemployment in LCDs Nairobi, IDS, Discussion
Paper No. 125, International Labour Office, Geneva, UN Development Programme, New York.
ii. ILO, (1977): “Poverty and Landlessness in Rural Asia, Geneva, ILO, www.ilo.org , Accessed on 07.5.2010.
iii. Mitchell J.C.(1959): “The Causes of Labour Migration”, Bulletin of the Inter-African Labour Institute, Vol.6
iv. Aziz, A. (1984): “Urban Poor and Urban Informal Sector”, Ashish Publishing House, New Delhi.
v. Timalsina, K. P. (2007): “Rural-Urban Migration and Livelihood in the Informal Sector: A Study of Street Vendors of
Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal”, Master of Philosophy Thesis in Development Studies, Norwegian University of
Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
vi. Bryant, J. J. (1992): “Poverty in Fiji: Who are the urban poor”, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, Vol.13, No.2.
vii. Rao and Reddy (1995): “Analysis of Consumption Patterns in Rural Andhra Pradesh”, Indian Journal of Economics
76(301), 165-175.
viii. Gupta. A (1986): “Consumption Behavior in India”,- A Study of All India Consumption Estimates", Anmol Publications,
Delhi, P.12.
ix. Ghosh B. K. (2010): “Rural-Urban Consumption Patterns In Bangladesh” International Review of Business Research
Papers, Vol. 6. No.4. PP. 30 – 47.
x. Johar, R.S, Sandhu, (1982): “Consumption Pattern in Panjab”, Indian Economic Journal, Vol.29, No.4, PP.69-85.
xi. Ndanshau M O. A (1998-2001): “An Econometric Analysis of Engel's Curve:The Case of Peasant Households in Northern
Tanzania”, UTAFITI [New Series] Special Issue, Vol. 4, 57-70.
xii. Dissanayake Mallika and Files (1988): “Household Expenditure in Srilanka an Engel Curve Analysis", Journal of
Quantitative Economics, Vol. IV, No.1, PP.117-155.
xiii. Ahmad et al (2012): “Analysis of Income and Economies of Scale Effect on Household Demand in Pakistan Using PSLM
Data” Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, Vol.3, No.12.
xiv. Amir, H (2012): “Consumption Pattern of Different Commodities in Pakistan” International Journal of Academic Research
in Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 8.
xv. Douglass, M (1998): “World City Information the Asia Pacific Rim: Poverty, ‘Everyday’ Forms of Civil Society and
Environmental Management” in Douglass. M & Friedman, J “Cities for Citizens”. Wiley, cited in Meikle et al.
(2001):“Sustainable Urban Livelihoods: Concepts and Implications for Policy”, Working Paper No. 112, Development
Planning Unit, London.
xvi. Engel, E. (1857): “Die Produktions- und Consumptions Verh¨ altnisse des K¨onigreichs Sachsen”, Zeitschrift des
Statistischen Bureaus des K¨oniglich S¨achsischen Ministeriums des Inneren, 8 and 9. Reprinted in the Appendix of Engel
(1895) cited in Houthakker, H. S (1957).
xvii. Houthakker, H. S (1957): “An International Comparison of Household Expenditure Patterns Cmmemorating the Centenary
of Engel’s law”, Econometrica, Vol. 25 (1957), 532-5.
xviii. Parpiev and Yusupov (2011): “An Economic Analysis of Food Consumption Pattern in Karnataka with Special Reference
to Mysore District”. A Thesis submitted to the University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agricultural Economics,
Dharwad (Institute), Dharwad, Karnataka India.
xix. Safder, S; Ahmad, N and Sher, F (2012): “Estimation of Urban-Rural Expenditure and Size Elasticities of Food items in
Pakistan: Evidence from PSLM Data”, Academic Research International, Vol.3, No.23.
xx. Marimuthu P, Meitei M H, Sharma B (2009): “General morbidity prevalence in the Delhi slums”, Indian Journal of
Community Medicine.
xxi. Census of India (2001): “Cities, Towns, and Urban Agglomerations”.
xxii. Census of India (2011): “Provisional Population Total”, Rural Urban Distribution Paper 2, Vol. 1 of 2011.
xxiii. Bhagat, R.B. (2011): “Emerging Patterns of Urbanization in India”, Economic and Political Weekly, 46, 10-12.
xxiv. Kundu, A. (2011): “Method in Madness: Urban Data from 2011 Census” Economic and Political Weekly, 46, 13-16.
xxv. National Sample Survey Organization (2002): “Housing Condition in Indian Household Amentias and others
Characteristics”, NSS 58th Round Jul-Dec 2002, Department of Statistics, Government of India.
xxvi. National Sample Survey Organisation (2006): “Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India
(2006)”, Employment and Unemployment Situation in India 2004-2005 (Part 1); NSS Round 61, Report No. 515-I and II
(61/10/1 & 2), Delhi.
xxvii. Banarjee, N. and Nihila, M. (1999): “Business Organization in Leather Industries of Calcutta and Chennai”. In: Bagchi,
A.K., Ed., Economy and Organisation: Indian Industries under the Neoliberal Regime, Sage Publications, New Delhi.
xxviii. Nihila (2002): “Growing Industries, Sick Workers”,- A Study of Leather Tanning Industry of Dindigul from an
Occupational Health Perspective. Review of Development and Change, 7, 134-166.
xxix. National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector (2007): Report on Conditions of Work and Promotion of
Livelihoods in the Unorganised Sector.