Intersection Control: 8.1 General Concepts of Traffic Control 8.2 Conflict Points at Intersection
Intersection Control: 8.1 General Concepts of Traffic Control 8.2 Conflict Points at Intersection
An intersection is an area shared by two or more roads. Its main function is 3. Operation: Fulfill traffic requirements in a consistent and uniform
to allow the change of route directions. way.
Control Purpose: to assign the right of way to drivers, and thus to facilitate 8.2 CONFLICT POINTS AT INTERSECTION
highway safety by ensuring the orderly and predictable movement of all
traffic on highways Conflicts occur when traffic streams moving in different directions interfere
with each other. The three types of conflicts are merging, diverging, and
▪ Traffic signals crossing.
▪ Signs
▪ Markings
The more complex the maneuvering area, the greater the need for a
properly designed traffic control system.
If none of the safety or volume criteria (excluding that for the 30 percent
8.3 TYPES OF INTERSECTION CONTROL reduction for speeds of 40 mi/h or more) is fully met, but each satisfies
80 percent of the minimum requirement, the installation of a multiway
The methods used in controlling streams of vehicles depend on the: stop sign is justified.
type of intersection
volume of traffic Average Delay
Volume Criteria
of Vehicles Crash
(for 8 hours on an
(during the Criterion
In the US, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) is average day)
max.hour)
followed. There are guidelines for determining the suitable control type for a
particular intersection.
Major Not less than 300
● The Vienna Convention on Road Signs and Signals is the standard 𝒗𝒆𝒉 ___
Road Not less
that the traffic signs in the Philippines are based in and is very 𝒉𝒓
than 5
different from the United States. crashes
The difference: Graphic design and symbological details. Traffic signs in the Minor Not less than 200 Not less than 30
𝒖𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒔𝒆𝒄 per year
Philippines are triangular, with white backgrounds, red boarders, and Road 𝒗𝒆𝒉
𝒉𝒓
symbols that express the specific hazard
CONDITION A
satisfied when the delay during any four consecutive 15-minute
periods on one of the minor-street approaches (one direction only)
controlled by a stop sign is equal to or greater than specified levels
and the same minor-street approach (one direction only) volume and
the total intersection entering volume are equal to or greater than
the specified levels.
Specified Delay
Warrant 4: Minimum Pedestrian Volume
▪ This warrant is satisfied when the pedestrian volume crossing the
One-Lane Approach 4 veh-hrs
major street on an average day is at least 100 for each of any four
hours or 190 or higher during any one hour and there are fewer than
Two-Lane Approach 5 veh-hrs
60 gaps/hr that are acceptable by pedestrians for crossing.
• When this warrant is used, the signal should be of the traffic-actuated
Specified Volumes on
type with pushbuttons for pedestrian crossing.
the Same Minor Approach
(one direction only) Warrant 5: School Crossing
▪ This warrant is used when the main reason for installing a traffic
𝒗𝒆𝒉
One Moving Lane 100 signal control is to accommodate the crossing of the major street by
𝒉𝒓
schoolchildren.
Two Moving ▪ When the frequency of occurrence of gaps and the lengths of gaps
𝒗𝒆𝒉
150 are inadequate for safe crossing of the street by schoolchildren, this
Lanes 𝒉𝒓
warrant is applied.
▪ Main objective: to reduce the average delay of all vehicles and the
probability of crashes.
Schematic of a Dilemma Zone at an Intersection
▪ Achieved through: minimizing the possible conflict points when
assigning the right of way to different traffic streams at different 𝑋𝑐 = 𝑢𝑜 (𝜏𝑚𝑖𝑛 ) − (𝑊 + 𝐿)
times.
where:
8.4.2 SIGNAL TIMING AT ISOLATED INTERSECTIONS 𝑋𝑐 = the distance within which a vehicle traveling at the speed limit (𝑢𝑜 )
during the yellow interval (𝜏𝑚𝑖𝑛 ) cannot stop before encroaching on the
YELLOW INTERVAL intersection. Vehicles within this distance at the start of the yellow interval
▪ Main purpose: to alert motorists to the fact that the green light is will therefore have to go through the intersection.
about to change to red and to allow vehicles already in the 𝑊 = Width of intersection (ft)
intersection to cross it. 𝐿 = Length of vehicle (ft)
𝑢𝑜 2 2. The Highway Capacity Method
𝑋𝑜 = 𝑢𝑜 𝛿 +
2𝑎
where: WEBSTER METHOD
𝑋𝑜 = the minimum distance from the intersection for which a vehicle 1.5𝐿 + 5
𝐶𝑜 =
traveling at the speed limit(𝑢𝑜 ) during the yellow interval (𝜏𝑚𝑖𝑛 ) cannot go 1 − ∑∅𝑖=1 𝑌𝑖
through the intersection without accelerating; any vehicle at this distance or
at a distance greater than this has to stop where:
𝛿 = perception-reaction time (sec)
𝑓𝑡 𝐶𝑜 = optimum cycle length (sec)
𝑎 = constant rate of braking deceleration (𝑠𝑒𝑐 2 )
𝐿 = total lost time per cycle (sec)
𝑌𝑖 = maximum value of the ratios of approach flows to saturation flows for
𝑊 + 𝐿 𝑢𝑜
𝜏𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝛿 + + all lane groups using phase 𝑖 (i.e., 𝑞𝑖𝑗 /𝑆𝑗 )
𝑢𝑜 2𝑎
∅ = number of phases
If the effect of grade is added, use:
𝑞𝑖𝑗 = flow on lane groups having the right of way during phase 𝑖
𝑊+𝐿 𝑢𝑜
𝜏𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝛿 + + 𝑆𝑗 = saturation flow on lane group 𝑗
𝑢𝑜 2(𝑎 + 𝐺𝑔)
𝐺𝑎𝑖 = 𝐺𝑒𝑖 + ℓ𝑖 − 𝜏𝑖
▪ This difference is considered lost time, since it is not used by any
other phase for the discharge of vehicles 𝐺𝑎∅ = 𝐺𝑒∅ + ℓ∅ − 𝜏∅
ℓ𝑖 = 𝐺𝑎𝑖 + 𝜏𝑖 − 𝐺𝑒𝑖
where:
▪ It is necessary to provide a minimum green time that will allow the
ℓ𝑖 = lost time for phase 𝑖
pedestrians to safely cross the intersection.
𝐺𝑎𝑖 = actual green time for phase 𝑖 (excluding yellow time)
𝜏𝑖 = yellow time for phase 𝑖
▪ The green time allocated to the traffic moving in the north–south
𝐺𝑒𝑖 = effective green time for phase 𝑖
direction should not be less than the green time required for
∅
pedestrians to cross the east–west approaches at the intersection.
𝐿 = ∑ ℓ𝑖 + 𝑅
▪ The minimum green time can be determined by using the HCM
𝑖=1
where: expressions given:
𝐿 = total lost time 𝐿 𝑁𝑝𝑒𝑑
𝐺𝑝 = 3.2 + + [2.7 ] for 𝑊𝑒 > 10ft
𝑅 = total all-red time during the cycle 𝑆𝑝 𝑊𝑒
𝐿
ALLOCATION OF GREEN TIMES 𝐺𝑝 = 3.2 + + (0.27𝑁𝑝𝑒𝑑 ) for 𝑊𝑒 ≤ 10ft
𝑆𝑝
∅
𝐺𝑡𝑒 = 𝐶 − 𝐿 = 𝐶 − (∑ ℓ𝑖 + 𝑅) where:
𝑖=1
𝐺𝑝 = minimum green time (sec)
where:
𝐿 = crosswalk length (ft)
𝐶 = actual cycle length used (obtained by rounding off 𝐶𝑜 to the nearest five
𝑆𝑝 = average speed of pedestrians, usually taken as 4 ft/sec)
seconds)
3.2 = pedestrian start-up time
𝐺𝑡𝑒 = total effective green time per cycle 𝑊𝑒 = effective crosswalk width
𝑁𝑝𝑒𝑑 = number of pedestrians crossing during an interval
▪ To obtain minimum overall delay, the total effective green time
should be distributed among the different phases in proportion to THE HIGHWAY CAPACITY METHOD
their Y values to obtain the effective green time for each phase.
𝑌𝑖 ▪ Used to determine the cycle length based on the capacity (the
𝐺𝑒𝑖 = 𝐺𝑡𝑒 maximum flow based on the available effective green time) of a lane
𝑌1 + 𝑌2 + ⋯ 𝑌∅
group.
𝐶
𝑋𝑐 = ∑(𝑣/𝑠)𝑐𝑖
▪ Since the saturation flow rate is the maximum flow rate on a lane 𝐶−𝐿
𝑖
group when 100 percent effective green time is available, the
capacity of a lane group depends on the percentage of the cycle where:
length that is given to that lane group. 𝑋𝑐 = critical 𝑣/𝑐 ratio for the intersection
∑𝑖(𝑣/𝑠)𝑐𝑖 = summation of the ratios of actual flows to saturation flow for all
𝑐𝑖 = 𝑠𝑖 (𝑔𝑖 ⁄𝐶 ) critical lanes, groups, or approaches
𝐶 = cycle length (sec)
where: 𝐿 = total lost time per cycle computed as the sum of the lost time, (𝑙𝑖 ) for
𝑣𝑒ℎ
𝑐𝑖 = capacity of lane group 𝑖 ( ℎ
) each critical signal phase, 𝐿 = ∑ 𝑙𝑖
𝑠𝑖 = saturation flow on lane group
𝑣𝑒ℎ 𝐶
( of green or veh/h/g) 𝑋𝑐 = ∑(𝑣/𝑠)𝑐𝑖
ℎ 𝐶−𝐿
(𝑔𝑖 ⁄𝐶 ) = green ratio for lane group 𝑖
𝑔𝑖 = effective green for lane group 𝑖 ▪ Used to estimate the signal timing for the intersection if this is
𝐶 = cycle length unknown and a critical (v/c) ratio is specified for the intersection.
𝐵 100 − 𝑃
𝑑𝑗 = (𝐶𝐴 + )
𝑉𝑗 100
where:
𝑑𝑗 = average delay per vehicle on 𝑗 𝑡ℎ approach during 𝑖 𝑡ℎ phase
(1−𝜆𝑖 )2 𝑥𝑗 2
𝐴= 2 (1−𝜆𝑖 𝑥𝑗 )
(see Table 8.5) 𝐵= 2 (1−𝑥𝑗 )
(see Table 8.6)
𝐶 = cycle length (sec)
𝑉𝑗 = actual volume on 𝑗 𝑡ℎ approach (veh/lane/sec)
𝜆𝑖 = proportion of cycle length that is effectively green
(that is, 𝐺𝑒𝑖 /C, where 𝐺𝑒𝑖 is effective green time for phase 𝑖)
𝑥𝑗 = degree of saturation for the 𝑗 𝑡ℎ approach = 𝑉𝑗 /𝜆𝑖 𝑠𝑗
𝑠𝑗 = saturation flow for the 𝑗 𝑡ℎ approach (veh/lane/sec)
𝑃 = percentage correction, ranging from 5 percent to 15 percent
▪ When such a signal is used, vehicles arriving at the intersection are
registered by detectors which transmit this information to a
controller.
▪ The major factor, however, is that a semiactuated signal works as a ℎ = average headway (sec)
pretimed signal during peak periods. 𝑛 = number of vehicles waiting bet. the detectors and stop line
▪ It is therefore important that the time set for the maximum green in 𝐾1 = starting delay (sec)
the minor stream be adequate to meet the demand during the peak
period. Suitable values for ℎ and 𝐾1 are 2 sec and 3.5 sec, respectively.
▪ This is the sum of the initial portion and the unit extension.
UNIT EXTENSION
▪ Note that alternative extensions for computing these green times
▪ depends on the average speed of the approaching vehicles and the are also given in the HCM.
distance between the detectors and the stop line.
FULLY ACTUATED SIGNALS ▪ When given the right of way, vehicles move at the same time along
the arterial and stop at the nearest signalized intersection when the
▪ Fully Actuated Signals
right of way is given to the side streets.
▪ are suitable for intersections at which large fluctuations of traffic
▪ A simple approximate mathematical relationship for this
volumes occur on all approaches during the day
system is:
▪ Maximum and minimum green times are set for each approach.
𝑋
▪ Procedures described for semiactuated signals may be used to 𝑢=
1.47𝐶
determine the lengths of the different set times.
where:
𝑋 = average spacing for signals (ft)
8.4.5 SIGNAL TIMING OF ARTERIAL ROUTES 𝑢 = progression speed (mi/h)
𝐶 = cycle length (sec)
▪ In urban areas where two or more intersections are adjacent to
each other, the signals should be timed so that when a queue of
vehicles is released by receiving the right of way at an intersection, ALTERNATE SYSTEM
these vehicles also will have the right of way at the adjacent
intersections. ▪ Intersections on the arterial are formed into groups of one or
more adjacent intersections.
▪ This coordination will reduce the delay experienced by vehicles on
the arterial. ▪ The signals are then set such that successive groups of signals
are given the right of way alternately.
▪ To obtain this coordination, all intersections in the system must
have the same cycle length. ▪ Single alternate - when the groups are made up of individual
▪ In rare instances, however, some intersections in the system may signals
have cycle lengths equal to half or twice the common cycle length. ▪ Double-alternate - system when the groups are made up of
▪ The methods used to achieve the required coordination are the: two adjacent signals
1. Simultaneous System ▪ An alternate system is most effective when the intersections
2. Alternate System are at equal distances from each other.
3. Progressive System
▪ The speed of progression in an alternate system is given as:
𝑛𝑋
SIMULTANEOUS SYSTEM 𝑢=
1.47𝐶
▪ All signals along a given arterial have the same cycle length and
have the green phase showing at the same time.
where: ▪ Computer programs have been developed to cope with several
𝑋 = average spacing for signals (ft) problems associated with progressive signal timing.
𝑛 = 2 for the simple-alternate system ▪ The use of computers to reduce the computational effort and
= 4 for the double-alternate system increase analysis flexibility has made the design of signalized arterial
= 6 for the triple-alternate system systems less taxing.
𝑢 = progression speed (mi/h) ▪ One program is a version of TRANSYT-7F that uses a generic
𝐶 = cycle length (sec) algorithm to optimize cycle length, phasing, and offsets.
It is essential that the control of freeway entrance ramps be undertaken only Permanent ramp closures
when certain conditions are satisfied. ▪ do not provide any future opportunity for use of the ramp and
therefore are the most restrictive of the three types of ramp closures
Installation of entrance-ramp control signals may be justified when at least ▪ should be used only when absolutely necessary
one of the following conditions exists:
Temporary closures
1. There is recurring congestion on the freeway due to traffic demand in ▪ used during maintenance or construction activities at the ramp in
excess of the capacity, or there is recurring congestion or a severe accident order to eliminate the potential conflict between ramp and
hazard at the freeway entrance because of an inadequate ramp merging area. construction vehicles, and between construction workers and ramp
An indication of recurring freeway congestion is when an operating speed less vehicles
than 50 mi/h occurs regularly for at least a half-hour period. ▪ used to assist in the management of traffic on a freeway near the
location of a special event
2. The signals are needed to accomplish transportation system management ▪ Bad weather conditions may also necessitate the temporary closure
objectives identified locally for freeway traffic flow. This includes maintaining of a ramp.
the level of service of a freeway at a specific level, providing priority
treatment for mass transit and carpools, and redistribution of access demand
from a ramp to other ramps.
Time-of-day or scheduled closure PRETIMED METERING
▪ used during the morning and peak hours at locations when recurring ▪ the metering rate is based on historical conditions and there is no
traffic congestion may lead to a severe safety problem requirement for communication with a Traffic Management Center
▪ recommended that adequate signing be provided to avoid any
confusion by motorists unfamiliar with the area. ▪ form of metering consists of setting up a pretimed signal with
extremely short cycles at the ramp entrance
Manual Barricades
▪ can be either portable or fixed
▪ Portable barricades - can be moved from place to place and include
gates and cones; used for temporary closures.
▪ Fixed barricades - usually permanently installed and provide the
flexibility of opening and closing of the ramp; include vertical and
horizontal swing gates that are installed alongside the ramp.
Closure
▪ The use of enforcement personnel is another method of ramp
closure.
▪ This is normally used on a temporary basis when automated systems
are either not installed or when maintenance personnel are
The figure above shows the layout of a typical simple metering system for an
unavailable to install temporary barricades.
entrance ramp, including some optional features that can be added to the
basic system.
LOCAL OR ISOLATED METERING CONTROL
▪ uses conditions at a specific ramp to determine the metering rate
PRETIMED METERING
▪ appropriate only for ramps with isolated problems and when no
▪ The calculation of the metering rate depends on the primary
effort is made to consider conditions at adjacent ramps
objective of the control.
▪ Primary Objective: to improve safety or alleviate congestion at the
ramp
▪ When this objective is to reduce congestion on the highway, the
difference between the upstream volume and the downstream
SYSTEM-WIDE OR COORDINATED METERING CONTROL
capacity (maximum flow that can occur) is used as the metering rate.
▪ used for ramps along a freeway segment, an entire corridor, or
several corridors where problems at one ramp may affect the other
adjacent ramps
▪ more effective than local control in dealing with capacity reduction