Proiect Antene
Proiect Antene
PROJECT
HARABAGIU IOANA
RADESCU SIMINA
441G
Requirement
Voltage distribution:
Explanation: the phase is changed so the distribution angle (the orientation in plan) is changed.
b) represent in polar coordinates (in the far field zone) the radiated field for one element in two
perpendicular planes; compare with the case when for the same dipole the current is kept at the
same magnitude and β 0i =0deg; explain.
First dipole, for β = 45°:
Z0 1 1 l
Rin C ln kl Ci kl sin kl Si 2kl 2Si kl cos(kl ) C ln k Ci 2kl 2Ci kl
2 2 2 2
kd 2
i i i
Z0
X in i
2 S kl cos i i
kl 2 S kl S 2 kl sin kl 2C kl C 2kl C
2
2l
lambda=3e8/100e6
d=lambda/2
h=dipole('Length',d)
figure(1)
impedance (h,0.9*100e6:1e6:1.1*100e6)
figure(2)
vswr(h,0.9*100e6:1e6:1.1*100e6)
Using NEC, the diagrams look like the following:
- Standing wave ratio:
- Impedance:
Using the formulas for the reflection coefficient and the formula for the voltage stand wave
ration one can find the variation in frequency of the second.
𝑍𝑖𝑛 − 𝑍0
Γ=
𝑍𝑖𝑛 + 𝑍0
1 + | Γ|
𝑉𝑆𝑊𝑅 =
1 − | Γ|
Z0=377Ω
Zin=78.2994 +j45.0801 Ω (at 100 MHz) => VSWR=4.8868
Zin=58.599 -j116.78Ω (at 90 MHz) => VSWR=7.0648
Zin=104 +j204.2Ω (at 110 MHz) => VSWR=4.7540
d) determine analytically the array factor
Our system is formed by N=3 elements positioned along z axis, parallel to x axis.
In order to find the total field of the array, we have to multiply the field generated by one
antenna by the array factor. This factor can be computed using the following formula:
AF = ∑𝑁
𝑛=1 𝑒
𝑗(𝑛−1)𝛹
where Ψ = kdcosγ + β
AF = ∑𝑁
𝑛=1 𝑒
𝑗(𝑛−1)Ψ
𝐴𝐹 = 1 + 𝑒 −jΨ2 + 𝑒 −2𝑗Ψ3
𝐴𝐹 = 2.997 − 0.061𝑗
|𝐴𝐹| = 2.998
e) determine and represent the directivity of the array and the gain; explain
We know that the directivity of an antenna is the ratio of the radiation intensity in a given
direction from the antenna to the radiation intensity averaged over all directions.
The radiation intensity in a certain direction is the power radiated from an antenna per unit solid
angle and it can be computed with the formula:
𝑍 𝑘𝐼 𝑙
U = r2 * Wrad= 20 ( 4𝜋0 ) 𝑠𝑖𝑛2 θ
The averaged radiation intensity can be computed by dividing the total power radiated by the
antenna by 4 π.
4𝜋𝑈𝑚𝑎𝑥
D= 𝑃𝑟𝑎𝑑
In our case, θ = 0° , so one can notice that Wrad goes to infinity, therefore, the radiation intensity
will no longer depend on the observation point.
The directivity can be also expressed in the following way:
𝑘𝑙 𝑘𝑙 2
𝑐𝑜𝑠 ( 2 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃) − 𝑐𝑜𝑠 ( 2 )
2[ ] |
𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜃
𝑚𝑎𝑥
𝐷0 =
𝑄
Where:
1
𝑄 = 𝐶 + 𝑙𝑛(𝑘𝑙) − 𝐶𝑖 (𝑘𝑙) + 𝑠𝑖𝑛(𝑘𝑙)[𝑆𝑖 (2𝑘𝑙) − 2𝑆𝑖 (𝑘𝑙)]
2
1 𝑘𝑙
+ 𝑐𝑜𝑠(𝑘𝑙) [𝐶 + 𝑙𝑛 ( ) + 𝐶𝑖 (2𝑘𝑙) − 2𝐶𝑖 (𝑘𝑙)]
2 2
The half-power beamwidth is the angle between the two directions in which the radiation
intensity is one-half the maximum value of the beam. It can be measured on the main lobe as the
difference between the angles at which the maximum power decreases by 3dB.
In the case of one dipole, the maximum gain is 2.15 dB. Using markers, one can find that the
half-power beamwidth is approximately 50°, measuring around 0.91 dB, on both directions, 25°
and respectively -25°.
In the case of the array, the maximum gain is 7.15 dB. The half-power beamwidth is
approximately 35° , measuring around 3.68 dB on direction 80° and 4.25 dB on direction 115°.
g) Include in the simulation a perfect ground. Represent ON THE SAME graph the radiation
patterns of the array with and without ground (in any of the 2 planes); explain; other additional
tools may be required to plot on the same graph.
The diagrams without the ground are the following ones:
After adding a perfect ground, the diagrams look like the following ones:
Explanation: In the case of adding a perfect ground, the number of lobes increases and there will
be no radiation in the z plane, that is the reason why it appears only in the upper half of the
diagram.